Added: 3 years ago
From: legolasminaur
Views: 90,982
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (198)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Un film si o melodie care ma fac sa plang de fiecare data! Sontu, Maracineanu sunt eroii mei din copilarie! TRAIASCA ROMANIA MARE IN VECHILE HOTARE!

  • apare emblema regala daca te uiti pe steagurile soldatilor

  • maior gheorghe sontu.capitan walter maracineanu....adevarati eroi ai Romaniei...dar din pacate prea putin amintiti in cartile de istorie!!!

  • Very powerful scene.

    I do wonder, those flags around 1:26, are those captured ottomans banners?

  • @ViccardXViccc Yes. They have the symbolic Ottoman half-moon, and they are held horizontally, a sign of defeat.

  • @ViccardXViccc maybe....or the unity's flags!

  • au murit pt ROMANIA MARE

  • Cei din 1877 au fost eroi adevarati...poate singurii..

  • Traiasca eroii armatei romane: maior George Sontzu, capitan Walter Maracinescu, maior Constantin Ene, maior Dimitrie Giurescu, locotenent Bordeanu, locotenent Pavel Bordeianu, maior Mateescu, capitan Constantin Merisescu, locotenent Radovici, sanitar Maria Cerchez, gornist Ioana Ciuca, sergent Ion Ciuca..si miile de eroi care necunoscuti care si au dat viatza ca Romania sa existe!!

  • Doar intre 1978 si 1989 Romania nu a fist o tara libera.Pe vremea aia toti se dadeau in gat unii pe altii pentru nimic.

  • România was always a free country! PROUND TO BE ROMANIAN(Vlach)!

  • 6 dislikes=6 cretini,6 idioti.

  • Traiasca Romania!

  • cum se numeste filmul ?

  • @romania901 Se numeste "Pentru Patrie". A nu se confunda cu "Razboiul de independenta" care e facut tot in 1977 si este in mai multe episoade; in plus are si cateva mici schimbari ale actorilor ce interpreteaza personajele.

  • e foarte frumos filmul , daca nu la-ti vazut vi-l recomand

  • filmul e frumos dar e facut in stilul comunist de a falsifica istoria ,adica regele Carol nu apare desi a avut o contributie majora in acest razboi, de pe toate steagurile tricolore lipseste emblema regala etc.

  • @georgedumitru1

    da, dar rolul regelui Carol I a fost interpretat de Sergiu Nicolaescu asa ca se compenseaza :)

  • @georgedumitru1 Ba apare, jucat de Sergiu Nicolaescu, dar nu in multe scene.

  • @georgedumitru1 macar atunci se faceau..acum sincer n-am mai vazut vreun film cu sau fara stema regala..

  • bah englezoilor ce va trebuie voua plecati la naiba in anglia ce va mananca in cur nu mai aveti ce distruge pe acolo si veniti aici boratilor.

  • VIctorie Fratilor, sunteti eroi!!!

  • De ce oare in fiecare video romanesc, ca asta de exemplu apar cativa dobitoci cu grave probleme mentale care spun tot felul de prostii si isi bat joc de noi si de toata istoria noastra cu afirmatii nefondate.

  • @BloodyBaron90 Apar pentru că imaginea României în lume e slabă. Nu mai suntem percepuţi nici măcar ca arbitrii în Balcani, cum eram odată.

    Practic îşi bat joc de noi, România la ora actuală nu valorează nimic pentru cei din jurul ei. Îşi bat joc de noi pentru că le place şi pentru că le-am permis. Ungurii îşi bat joc de noi, Ucrainenii îşi bat joc de noi, Sârbii, Bulgarii. Ce-am fost şi ce-am ajuns....

  • What s name of the march?

  • @VolodyaBaybakov The march is called "Drum bun" in translation means "good way". Do you want to listen the verses? See "Drum bun-1877".

  • Muie la bozgori si la bulgari

  • Sa nu uitam ca alaturi de armata rusa nr-am castigat independenta.Si tot alaturi de ei am reintregit teritoriul in 1918.Initial,in 1940-1945 am luptat alaturi de nemnti.Si apoi am intors armele.Si se vede ce a iesit.

  • @manealiviu77 da sa nu uitam ca armata rusa prima oara a refuzat intrarea in razboi a Romaniei si pe urma dupa ce i-au caftit turcii bine au cerut ajutorul regelui Carol 1 si sa nu uitam ca au cam uitat sa plece de pe teritoriul nostru dupa razboi pana cand au intervenit marile puteri,ca era sa iasa razboi intre noi si ei,sa nu uitam ca in 1917 din cauza revolutiei bolsevice armata rosie se retragea in dezordine din transee lasand armata romana descoperita ...

  • @manealiviu77 ...sa nu uitam ca s-au descoperit documente care aratau ca dupa 23 august 1945 timp de 2 saptamani armata rosie a primit in continuare ordin sa trateze armata romana ca inamica,luand prizonieri zeci daca nu sute de mii de soldati romani,dar cel mai important sa nu uitam ca dupa 45 au urmat zeci de ani de ocupatie bolsevica si comunista.

  • Emotionant. Parca devii mai bun si mai intelept cand vezi asemenea evocari. Unii oameni ar trebui sa traiasca doua vieti ca sa dea tot ce au mai bun in ei. Asa este Sergiu Nicolaescu, unul dintre cei mai buni regizori. Pacat ca imbatraneste. Multumesc pentru postare!

  • nu trebuie sa facem nimic decat sa avem un gram de BUN SIMT sa nu mai violam babe, sa nu ne mai uitam la bianca dragusan,sau cum o chemao, si chiar sa nu ne mai intereseze ce face monica lu` columbeanu,LUATI ATITUDINE PRIN NEVIZIONARE PLS ! ! ! !

  • @sHobY0911 -- Frumos! Dar pacat, ca in toate lanurile de grau si porumb, se gasesc si buruieni. NU VOR DISPAREA niciodata buruienile si spinii societatii. Dar la noi parca sunt mai multe!

  • fegeaba a fost romania ce fost daca nu stim sa o pastram.....

    nici macar actorii nu stiu sa joace ei zambesc can citesc "scenarii"... pacat,mare pacat......

  • cum s-o numi melodia de la final?

  • Eroii nu mor!

  • Frumos film , frumoasa tema , pacat de frumoasa asta tara ...."Tara sa infloreasca ,Tara, pentru ea murim !"

  • we are Russia friends and ally with Amerika xD ROMANIA GO GO !!!!

    We Help RussiaVSGermany andVery good friends with Russia and Amerika

    i HATE TÜrkey Turkeys

  • povestea faptelor marete ale trecutului voi a-ti imbogati-o cu povestea faptelor numai ..... (dupa "numai" ce urmeaza) ?

  • proud romanians fighting for freedom!

  • In this war, Russia won

  • @87Vitalka 3 Romanian armies came and conquered Moscow meter by meter in the first lines ... and in 1941 Moldova has been released by the Romanian army without the help of German ... whith germans we grupat at Odesa

  • @87Vitalka And why the great duke Nicholas asked king Carol I to help him? Is a letter which shows this.Because Russian army wasn't able to defeat Turkish army. You know nothing! Go in Bulgaria at Grivitza and you'll see there a church fouded by king Carol I of Romania where are burried many Romanian soldiers.

  • Russia won the war thanks to the strength and courage of their soldiers, and the Romanians were our allies

  • Cel care vorbeste la inceput nu e Bratianu cumva?

  • @Legyonaru90 E Mihail Kogalniceanu nestiutorule

  • Nu stiu cum sunt locuitorii ungariei, insa conducatorii celor de etnie maghiara din tara noastra au reusit sa fure mai mult decat romanii. Le mai arunca cate un os cu autonomia ca sa mai tot prinda mandate dar fura tot codrul si-l dau peste hotare.

    Cum sa se dezvolte tara daca toata lumea fura, de la mic la mare

  • lasa-ti armata ce este...e tot ce a ramas din tara asta...

  • Si nu ungurii va vand,ci compatriotii Vostri.Ungurii sunt in aceeasi situatie.Noi traim in Ardeal de generatii impreuna,asa ca se vede,ca traiti in Sud,si nu ne cunoasteti.Omul conteaza,nu originea lui,si sincer,nu pot sa raspund de faptele generatiilor trecute,asa cum nici voi.LAsa-ti ura la o parte!

  • @misi1979 Si totusi...tu esti unul dintre ungurii "baietasi" care vorbesc si scriu in romana...dar in priviinta celor care nu stiu decat maghiara si sa tipe dupa autonomie nu avem urari de bine ! :)

  • Imi puteti spune va rog cum se numeste melodia de la sfarsitul filmului ?

  • Onoare Soldatilor Romani !

    Onoare Eroilor ROMANI !

  • pacat de toti acesti EROI care au murit in zadar pt independenta dc ne lasam acum umiliti si vanduti ungurilor de catre toata sleatca de hoti care ne conduc

  • Glorie soldatilor Romani care si au dat viatza ptr tara!!

  • Timpuri marete bre !!! Nu ca acum candstam toti cu morcovu' in fund .

  • Imi pare sincer rau ca nu am trait atunci; tare as fi vrut sa impusc curvele alea turcesti!

  • i am very upset with turkey because they did not help germany in world war 2. they suppose to join the axis powers.

  • Were the actors mentioned at the end of this clip actual soilders during the Communist era?

    If so, that's actually pretty cool.

  • The soldiers from the clip that pass under the Arc de Triomphe were really soldiers in real life, but the other ones who were briefly shown were only actors.

  • Glorie eterna ostasilor armatei romane care si-au jertfit viata pentru eliberarea patriei

  • how long were they a member of the austro hungarian empire?

  • fight and destroy the turks and russians.

  • you belive whatever you said??? destroy turks?

    its impossible my friend

    whole world try that once

    its impossible to destroy turks with fire-arms!!

  • @MosIonTaranul Si e vina alora care au murit acum 50, 100, 150, 200 sau 400 de ani ca noi acum ne vindem pe 2 parale? Atunci ei au realizat foarte multe pentru ca noi sa ne batem joc de toate acum...E vina noastra, nu a lor.

  • ce frumoasa e melodia asta Drum Bun! suuper suuuper ...asta ar trebui sa cante cand i executam pe politicieni

  • gheorghe zamfir-doina de jale

  • cum se numeste melodia de la

    4:12 ?

  • Comment removed

  • you fucked a romanian because our women are beautiful...when can you spit a turkish woman in the face?when her mustache is on fire.

  • Comment removed

  • @dexskin88 I don't no but I've been told/ Turkish pussy's mighty cold! Good comm, dude!

  • I am Albanian.I was listening to words said in Romanian and sounds like a mixture of latin and ilirian . I was listening to the ton of the words spoken and is not diferent from Albanian ton. it sure does not sound Slavik at all .

  • Obviously. Romanian is one of the 5 latin languages in the world: Italian, french romanian, spanish and portuguese. Thank you for your observation.

  • @nshkreli1 I can tell you the translation in English if you want

  • @nshkreli1 The Romanian language has also a small number of slavic words, but I don't believe that you can undestand Romanian without learning it.

  • @nshkreli1 The Dacians, an Indo-European people, were the ancient inhabitants of Romanian territory. They were defeated by the Romans in 106, and part of Dacia (Oltenia, Banat, and Transylvania) became a Roman province. This province, which was rich in ores, especially silver and gold, was colonized by the Romans who brought with them Vulgar Latin as the language of administration and commerce, and who started a period of intense romanization, which gave birth to the proto-Romanian language.

  • @nsihkreli1

    iliriens,tracians and dacian were the same or closely related people,only diferent names

  • Ba prostule noi am cucerit Insula serpilor d nu stiu cate ori, si in caz k nu stii ii singura insula din Marea Neagra care de-abia k are un hectar!

  • suntem din romania noastra si ne pisam pe ungaria voastra

  • nu e asa,

    Aici e Romania, este tara noastra si ne pisam pe ungaria voastra

  • @oceanic815crash  Multumesc la fel.

  • sorry but that is romanian film

  • Russians brothers ?? :))

    Fuck Russia !! :)))

    When Dacia was a strong civilization , germans were running in forests , and on the land where today is Russia were only barbaric people .

    You are living in a fiction world . The biggest nations always try to turn the history in their favor . The truth is that romanians are one of the oldest civilizations in europe . And the power of our ascenstors wasn't contested even by hungarian chronicles which recognized the might Dacia .

  • Who are you now?

  • @Volumep What are you talking about? Romanians You scream about the "Great Romania" but why did the Romanian state 120 years, and Russia in 1200? Even your brothers Moldovans and they do not consider you for the people, the great Stefan 2 times took Bucharest, and you Turks raped so what Greater Romania?

  • @87Vitalka Can you write correctly, so i would understand what you're saying ?

  • @Volumep Sorry, I do not speak English

  • @87Vitalka go away in your siberia from this site....

  • @gicalosDo not you point me to where I go

  • @87Vitalka Because all great powers of Europe did not like another state so great from old times.

    If you have known Romanian, you shoulds see that in all three regions Wallachia, Moldova (also the Moldova between Prut and Dnestr , north of Bukovina) Transylvania is spoken the same language and are not big differences to understand it. Also Russia did not agree the unification of Romania (see the Organical Rules period, 1821-1859)

  • @87Vitalka Because the great powers did not agreed another big power in Europe. When in 1600 Michael the Brave unified all three Romanian provinces (Moldova, Wallachia and Transilvania), the empereur Rudolf of Habsburg sent the general Basta to kill him for this. Also Russia don't agree this now; see the 14th Russian army kept in Transnistria for threat Rep. of Moldova to not be unified with Romania (and in this republic is spoken Romanian; I understand it very well without dictionary)

  • @Volumep when bulgaria is emperie romania is not since!Wath is this name Rom-enia

  • @obedinenie Bulgaria is a combination of romanians, turks and slavic people. Just like Ucraine. It is a nation that formed itself by gathering people from other nations. In so many years of turkish ocupation, lost a lot of the initial identity.

    And learn some english if you wish conversation. Romania = people that came from Rome - this is the meaning of the word.

  • @Volumep Well, thank you for your good English. However, the history/mytology you studied at school is just wrong. Many things are omitted: The poeple North of the Danube took orthodoxy from the Bulgarians as the lands were in or vasal to the Bulgarian empire. I know you will oppose it, but explain me the pure 'rumanian' words used in the liturgy as : slujba, mucenici and the funiest one pogdaproste(created from 3 Bulgarian words).

  • @honterus1218 It is normal that a country sustians it's own version... You should know that the dacians had long before the romans came a monotheistic religion. They belived in Zamolxe. It's true that a lot of orthodox words in Romania, have slavic origin. But that's not because of Bulgaria, but because of the Bizantine Empire which controlled the danubian states through intermediates ( which were not always the same). The biggest proof of who created whom, is in the prezent.

  • @Volumep I fail to see the logic. The liturgy was done for couple of centuries in the lands North of the Danubae- Walachia and Moldova(back then such kind of thing as romanian did not exist) in CHurch Slavonic i.e. Bulgarian. I know that history in Romania is a creative science, but the above fact is achnoledged also by the Romanians knowing the history of orthodox. So, the greatest part of what the romanians represent now is credited to vasality of their lands to the Bulgarian empire

  • @honterus1218 Bulgarian was never used in Romania. The alphabet used to write romanian text was kirilic (slav), just like you people write english words with your alphabet today (e.g. hotel = xotel). If you read one of those slavonic text outloud you will not understand anything, but romanians would. A sound can be written in bulgarian or greek or any other alphabet, but that doesn't make it greek or bulgarian. I know it's hard to find out that you've been lied to, but you'll get over it...

  • @unomnacajit11 Totally wrong. As I said go in the Patriarshy and see the texts e.g. МАЙКА ГОСПОДУ БОГУ(mother of god) It is pure Bulgarian. I know you do not study this in school. It is understandable that a young state and nation like Romania should find and keep its identity, but this is the truth. About Voronet - it is a fact written in Bulgarian. I leave you to read, search a bit and find the reason why. I knoow it.

  • @honterus1218 I can'r read those texts but I have listened to them and trust me they sound like old romanian. I'm sure you've never even seen them... and this may be a young state, but the nation was here thousands of years before the bulgars started moving out of Asia... and it stretched up to the Stara Planina....

  • @unomnacajit11 Believe me I've seen all the monasteries around Suceava- Starting with DRAGOMIRNA(another name made up of two Slavic words), Putna, Voronet etc. and they are depicted in Old Bulgarian. As I said before, I will not teach you history. If you are reasonable enoughg then add up 2+2. If not, its for your sake. As for the Romanian nation. The word started appearing end of middle ages. Everything else are fairy tales. Name me 'another ancient nation' whith no state, but long existence.

  • @honterus1218 "the Romanian nation. The word started appearing end of middle ages" Wrong. Even today there are illiterate people that call themselves "ruman" even though they have never heard of Romania, Rome, etc. Ancient nation : Romanians (Vlachs) in balgaria !!! And read some impartial books man. Bulgars were powerful only when they first came, in the Dark ages (the first empire). that's when the spread of slav alphabet started in all places where people did not have a writing system

  • @unomnacajit11 I am very glad you mentioned the Vlachs. They are romanized people during the Bizantium and are a living proof of a much more viable theory for the formation of the Romanians or Rumanians. Formed much later than the Ceausescu official doctrine, having much more Slavic genes than for examples(see iGENEA) research. I suuggest you to try to read sth different than the school text books. Ask yourself why the so called 'romanian history' starts with the fiction in the II A.C.

  • @honterus1218 1. igenea is a business. it will say whatever its services buyers wants to say.

    2. if you pick just what you want from history you'll be able to demonstrate anything you want. if you include EVERYTHING, you'll find out that the 'vlachs' north and south of the danube are indigenous to these lands.

    3. what fiction in the 2nd century??

  • @unomnacajit11 the fiction was the official Romanian theory for the creation of the nation: you know the Roman garnizon mixing with the Dacians la la, la la..... and nation

  • @honterus1218 any evidence that it's a fiction? 

  • @unomnacajit11 Here is an answer in your stile" if we take EVERYTHING in history then yes it is a fiction". I would say it is a theory much more unlike than the one stating the romanization of Slavs, Bulgarians Cumans etc. during the Biziantine period.

  • @honterus1218 ooohh so that's where you're gettin at? that the Romanians are in fact latinized bulgarians??? haaaaahahaa ... goodbye

  • @unomnacajit11 typical puberty behavour. No surprize. As I said before a young nation should defend the identity. At least you agreed with me that the Bulgarian language was official north of the Danube till 17th century. It is a step forward. @honterus1218 That's widely aknowledged man who sais it wasn't? But those were not "the romanians", they were priests in churches. Romanians DID NOT HAVE A WRITING SYSTEM. Very nice of you

  • @honterus1218 Bulgarian language wasn't official even in Bulgaria, let alone Romania. Don't know who the hell taught you that Bulgarian was oficial in Romania because this is false. Romanian language was official, written in the slavonic alphabet.

    Now go and kiss a Romanian foot, because the Romanians liberated bulgaria.

    Bye!

  • @AlexanderSSI Your ignorance does not surprize me. It is typical. However, If you are from Bucharest, visit the patriarshy and you will see the signs are in Slavonic i.e. Bulgarian. Then, if you have time visit Voronet monastery and you will see the same thing - Slavonic. Do not expect to ring a bell in your head, but it may be a good start.

  • @honterus1218 How stupid can you be. I already told you, it was written either in slavonic, which was the cult language either in Romanian with slavonic letters. Go back and study, it might help your brain!

    Go and take a look at "Palia de le Orăştie" from 1582, written in the slavonic alphabet and romanian language. You will find that all the words in that document are romanian thus latin words, you ignorant!

  • @unomnacajit11 ... and then 'history' continues more than 1000years later. Hello,....these are 1000years missing from the picture. During these years you were formed to sth as a nation. During these years the 'orthodoxy' came to Romania. It is not said how, neither why the hell the rumanized population did the liturgy in Church Slavonic i.e. Bulgarian.

  • @unomnacajit11 If you are interested google 'Influenta nefasta a Bisericii' from highimage blogspot

    It is in Romanian. Of course, there also some nationalistic POV here, but the main idea is there.

  • @honterus1218

    4. the dark ages are not so dark. The hungarians started this theory so before we continue the debate about the "missing 1000 years" i suggest you get in touch with them because everything they say has been proven to be a product of their rich imagination over and over again by non-romanian scholars.

    5. again, Xotel is not a bulgarian word, it's an english word.

    6. Thank you very much for your suggestions but I will choose NO TO GOOGLE HISTORY and stick to academic databases.

  • @unomnacajit11 @point 2. : for example, we know that bulgarians came from asia, we don't exactly where they originated from, we know that strange deep holes in the ground have been found in russia. If I pick just this info and forget the other evidence like you do, i can conclude that BULGARIANS CAME FROM HELL

  • @unomnacajit11 try this : watch?v=NvSDR6oYXAQ

  • @unomnacajit11 Sorry, but there is nothing academic in your debate. Just the usual. I will put a quote.t:Dimitrie Onciul: „în asemenea legături cu Bulgarii, Românii din Dacia, ca şi cei din dreapta Dunării din cuprinsul imperiului bulgar, au împărţit cu ei soarta în stat şi biserică. ........

  • @honterus1218 well if you want specific answers ask specific questions....

  • @unomnacajit11 quote continues:....Prin Bulgari şi odată cu dânşii, noi am fost despărţiţi de biserica romană; dela dânşii am primit limba slavonă în biserică şi stat, care domină apoi vieaţa noastră intelectuală până în secolul XVII. Aşa ne-a fost fatalul destin al istoriei". (Originile principatelor romane,pag.140, Bucuresti, 1899)

    As I said there is no doubte the Romanians used Bulgarian till 17th century. 

  • Comment removed

  • @Volumep Then go to Voronet monastery and ask yourself why it is depicted in Cyrillic in Old church Slavonic(Old Bulgarian). Then, if you are in Bucuresti, go to the Patriarshy(close to casa poporului) and see that the signs are also in Bulgarian. After all this if there is a sense in your head, not just Ceausescu BS, you can made up your mind who mixed with who and who is searching its identity.

  • @honterus1218 Due to the stronger roots, in time Romania rezisted to Ottomans, kept it's own administration, and united in 1918, resulting a big country which, at that time, was watching over the enitire Balkans. Also study the case of Germany, whith which i think that we have a lot of historical events in common.

    OF course, we can debate uninterrupted about this. Of course that i miss a lot of knowledge, of course that we can talk about the MANY theories there are related to thesourceofCyrillic

  • @Volumep Everyone wants to be compared to the Germans. Just for the record - the Bulgarians were known as the Prussians of the Balkans, while Biskarck said that Romanian is not a nation but a profession

  • @honterus1218 Why don't you go to Voronet and try reading the texts? What the hell do they teach you tjere? that Romania was bulgarian land or what ????

  • @obedinenie oops! when bulgaria was empire?????

  • @caracasromanul86 Oh boy,don't even try... It is well documented that Bulgarian Empire existed before unicellurar creatures like amaeba,not to mention Homo Sapiens ,the most famous Bulgarian.. why do you think they are all homos ?

  • @090148komaska50:)))))))))....­nice joke!

  • @caracasromanul86 ooops when romania is not here

  • @obedinenie ok smart guy then tell me when romania was "here"

  • @caracasromanul86 24.12.1861

  • Respond to this video... see in internet

  • @obedinenie These soldiers died to give Bulgarians an identity and a country.Shame on you !

  • @090148komaska50 i now,bulgarians soldiers too died for free romania

  • @Volumep Du-te cumpara-ti un creier, idiotule!

  • @Volumep well said! good job brother!

  • @Volumep If dacia was so strong why call yourselves romanians lol

  • @de1337ing Very good question. As it concerns me, I claim to be Dacian.

  • @radurambo might as well consider yourself thracian then... or go all the way and claim to be Indo-European. Everyone knows modern greeks are closer to dacians than romanians.

  • @de1337ing OK, I love greeks too

  • @de1337ing Every empire falls... as the Roman Empire did, the bizantines, the ottoman, the french, the british, etc. Dacia was defeated by the Roman Emp, just as, for example, the macedonian empire beat the persians.

    In 106, began the "romanization process" of the occupied dacian territories( there were free dacians too). The "romanians" are a synthesis between dacians and romans. Our language has more latin words than dacians one, that's one of the reasons we call ourselves romanians.

  • @de1337ing The second reason is that due to the dispute between Romania and Hungary which wanted Transilvania, it was crucial for us to prove our continuation on that territories. So we just said: after Dacia was conquered, the romans and the dacians lived together, forming the modern romanian people. This oppinion was sustained by romanians, mostly because the hungarians said that the dacians were totally destroyed.

  • @de1337ing So the country name of Romania, was also a prove of the continuation of our people on this lands. A result of a conceited war between these two countries(Ro and Hun), a result of an ideological war. Still there is a lot to be said concerned to your question. This is just a laconic answer. Sorry for the large stretch of it.

  • @rausch34 I'm sorry, but this comment of yours makes you a low-life.

  • Comment removed

  • TRAIASACA ROMANIA

    mi-as fi dorit sa exist yo prin acele vremuri si sa mor pt independenta.

    Sanatate tuturor romanilor

  • yes,plenty, fucking niemcy bastards at Grunwald together with the poles would be one :<

  • not that you are a german,you're just a pathetic immigrant turk in Germany most probably :<

  • @rausch34 We've beaten the turks so many times... Smth that the western powers very rarely managed. So...RESPECT.

  • @rausch34 If you don't know history, shut up you analphabet!!! See Bulgarian documents and the letter of great duke Nicholas of Russia who asked for help at king Carol I of Romania because his army wasn't able to defeat Turks.

  • @turnus2 Yep, it's true. Russian Empire wasn't able to win that war alone. We shall face it.

  • 1:28 steagurile capturate de la turci !

  • suntem un popor de eroi.

    TRAIASCA ROMANIA.