Added: 3 years ago
From: tonlitt
Views: 11,712
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (129)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • "Je suis un mensonge qui dit la vérité."

    Jean Cocteau.

  • Good info but the host seems like a dumbass.

  • Can they not test one of the Apollo space suits, to see if they can actually protect a person from all of the radiation and stuff that would be present on the lunar surface?

    If the suits don't pass, then it was faked...simple as that.

  • Looks like the presenter was a bit spaced out.

  • onepagenews d com has the true story about this.

  • cosmic radiation isn't lethal it gives you + yr family superpowers according to your personalities.

  • @taffysaur Right, it gives us fantastic 4 but only in the movie

  • They should never have introduced James Bond, Independence Day, ET,, World Government, etc. It made them look cranky and detracted from the evidence-based analysis of the alleged manned moon landings.

  • Percy for President classic they actually thought over there at Nasa that we would believe they flew there tin can to the moon. So Buzz Neil and the other guy are all Liars

  • 3:50, great question, its a really spooky thought

  • listen to the comments from about 8.00 onwards - it is this psychological understanding that explains everything. and if you're not intelligent enough to understand what i mean, well, that just proves my point - most people can't cope with the 'paradigm shift' - the knowledge that the official narrative, what they have been told, and always believed in, (e.g. 9/11 was just 19 hijackers) was a lie. and the fact that people like you can VOTE?!!! god help us all.

  • Why didn't the supposed 'host' Student Grant there not ask 'em a single challenging question? Mr bit-off-the-top-please Magician was the only voice of dissent..

  • Check out 7.38 and you will see above this guys eyes turn into some kind of strange black horns!

    We got ourselves a shapeshifter! lol

  • youtube videos are just HINTS for a research, I always end-up googling a lot after I watch some video and I make my own mind about things I do not accept any information without heavy criticism

  • @fresniak I see no problem there at all.

  • it's not my fault if the world is ruled by a psycopathic elite that adores ancient pagan gods and believes in the power of numerology and occultism.

  • @fresniak How about proving your claims with something concrete? So far you talk a lot, but say very little. It is the quality and not the quantity of your posts that matters in the end.

  • @CusterApollo The funny is that you want everything explained in 2 seconds lol you don't know anything about how the things work in the world, still you want that I can give you all the evidences here in these tiny text boxes..GO STUDY YOURSELF..Start from my channel if you want..

  • @fresniak I actually know a lot. And I have a firm grip on reality. I don't look at this as a competition, nor any type of challenge.

  • @CusterApollo So for example you do not belive apollo missions to the moon were faked? Even after seeing all the photographic evidences and after evaluating the scientific facts given here such as the radiation issue? Do you have a scientific background?

  • @fresniak I know Apollo missions were real. Photographic evidence? I have not seen any that reveals a hoax. Radiation? I have not seen any evidence that shows it was impossible to shield against it or survive in it for the short time Apollo missions lasted.

  • @CusterApollo it's amazing - they showed a picture with evident light fall-off and you say it's not evidence. You see you're just not a scientific type of person. I just checked your channel, you spent 23 years of your life !! upon just 2 historical researches (I guess the research consisted in hearing the experts and collecting items), sorry man but in 23 years I did much much more than that

  • @CusterApollo "I know Apollo missions were real" because they told you so LOL

  • @CusterApollo "I have not seen any evidence that shows it was impossible to shield against it or survive in it for the short time Apollo missions lasted. "

    did you see any evidence of the contrary??

  • @CusterApollo am going sleep, feel free to keep in touch..if you really want to but I doubt..still bye bye

  • @fresniak I will stop by every once in a while. If you want to discuss the supposed photographic or radiation evidence that proves Apollo was a hoax I am all for it.

  • And plese stop calling someone "conspiracy people" I am an individual with my head and I do not follow any group or feel part of any association.

  • "Since when is a youtube masonic video credible or even valid information? "

    This tells everything about your DEEP research. You just do not go to check those videos because of your prejudice that you'll find just bullshit. Well the reality you're living in, the same you want I take a pill for, is the bullshit

  • @fresniak Not prejudiced at all. Once again your interpretation is way off base. Having a brain and undertsanding which credible information to research is the key here. Youtube vids filled with hoaxers and conspiracy people like yourself is hardly credible. Maybe the reason you feel the way you do is because you believe the third-rate information on youtube rather than study anything of merit.

  • @CusterApollo I am an engineer, a well educated person, and you're assuming that I believe in bullshits and that since internet is filled with dubious information, you must discard it all a priori in order to protect your fragile vision of life in every way.

  • @fresniak I never claimed you were stupid in any way. I also have not suggested you discount all information found on the internet. I merely stated Youtube videos. You seem to have an inferiority issue here. Maybe instead of watching conspiracy videos you should work on building up your own self-esteem. And possibly lessen your own self-importance.

  • is the host stoned out of his mind? hahaha

  • Yes, but remember why the push to get to the moon: to beat the USSR! And the reason: to hold the high ground of space as a MILITARY POST for launching nuke missles at the enemy. That's what WE WERE TOLD, that was the PREACHED THREAT ! Yet by the mid 60's our nuke tipped missles could reach the other guy in just 34 minutes vs. 3 DAYS from the moon! We were led to BELIEVE that the USSR would CONQURE us if they got there 1st ! We've been conned and SCIENCE prooves shows us how it was done !

  • It could be possible that the manned moon landing is staged. Think about it , why is it that NASA never attempted another manned moon landing since 1969??!!! If NASA had the technology you would think that they would have landed a few more times by now.

  • @danny3571 Moon landings also occurred in 1971 and 1972

  • Apollo 13 was staged in order to get NASA more funding?

    Since when does an organization fake a near disaster in order to get the government to fund more money to NASA? Wouldn't a near disaster shake the confidence of the government and thus cause them to restrict funding even more?

  • @CusterApollo Nasa missions are full pf masonic symbls and numerology. This video does not draw the complete picture. 11 is the number to open the mind to a deception (Apollo 11, 9/11, etc..) , 13 is the masonic unlucky number.

  • @fresniak Wow, go and take a reality pill buddy. You see conspiracy all over the place. Especially when there is none. 11 and 13 would not have veen been significant if the Apollo 1 fire had not taken place. The actual missions would have been 5 and 7 without the fire.

  • @CusterApollo I see conspiracies all over because THERE ARE conspiracies all over, you fool. I don't care if you wanna continue being a sheep do so, one day you'll find out you had been a stupid fool

  • @fresniak Name calling again? That is a common trait of hoaxers and conspiracy theorists. You go on emotion rather than solid facts backed on research.

  • @CusterApollo I can show any solid fact you want, if only you take out the head from the ground.

    Since when saying "Fool" is name calling? It's just what I think of your way of answering to my invite to research the truth by yourself

  • @fresniak You would answer that way to any reasonable response that went against your opinions. Open your mind to knowledge then come back. Until then your opinions do nothing for me.

  • @CusterApollo you're the one who refused A PRIORI to watch a video I suggested to watch, not me. I am open to any discussion based just on YOUR MIND not based on what the society thinks it's NORMAL to think.

  • @CusterApollo Search videos on youtube for "Nasa Masonic" you'll find out that Aldrin is a 33rd degree mason, and many other information on nasa masonic agenda

  • @fresniak Since when is a youtube masonic video credible or even valid information? It is just like the host of silly moon hoax videos. They prove nothing while revealing an agenda, bias, and baseless opinion. Nice try though sport...

  • @CusterApollo so you think masonry doesn't exist or what? Are you scared to research it? Are you not interested in the symbology of nasa? You have the world financial crisis in front of your eyes, that was generated by the world financial elite, and still you do not believe that a masonic network has infiltrated the world? You're such a fool

  • @fresniak I never said it doesn't exist. But you conspiracy people see more than is there. This is about the Apollo program and not any nwo. And name calling gets you nowhere. Act like an adult and not like a child when it comes to people that disagree with your opinions.

  • @CusterApollo "Act like an adult and not like a child when it comes to people that disagree with your opinions. "

    you do not disagree you just like to put your head under the ground like an ostrich. If you would disagree you would go into a debate, not into negation

  • @fresniak Disagreement is not putting your head in the sand. Once again your interpretations and opinions are not even close to the end-all-be-all of anything. The old addage of my way or the highway does not work in the real world. Grow up.

  • @CusterApollo You do not disagree, you just refuse to watch some piece of evidence that I suggested, because you have a prejudice against it.

  • @fresniak What you consider evidence is actually propaganda and biased agenda driven videos that are not bounded on anything creidble. That is why I refuse to waste my time and watch them.

  • @CusterApollo since when you haven't used your mind and dared to do some research, without listening everything they tell you at school on in the tv?

  • @fresniak I actually do my own research. You are jumping to conclusions while having no evidence to support your opinions.

  • All the comments have me laughing so much I am afraid I will die laughing. If you guys remember it was the Russians with there Fake sputnik spy satellite that got the USA to hoax the moon landings. Later they faked the satellites that supposedly send information across the world. Yeah no satellite would last long in earths orbit as the spaghetti monster resides in the heavens and eats satellites for breakfast. GIVE ME A RIGIN BREAK.

  • dont you get it? The photos are obviously faked. Why did NASA fake the photos in a studio? And why dont they tell us where the studios were and why they faked them?

  • @ Focoist911 I was being sarcastic or don't you know the meaning of the word. Conspiracy theorist believers are a waste of space and time. Always trying to drag other people to there low level of ignorance. If the USA had faked the moon landing the Russians would have been the 1st to shout about it. You probably weren't even born.

  • "Conspiracy theorist believers are a waste of space and time. "

    Are you saying that we can do without the FBI?

    BTW, can you ask the FBI when they are going to make public to the world the evidence they have that 19 hijackers were on those planes on 9/11? Or do we just take their word for it? You realise no evidence has ever been presented in court? Just the FBI's word and the media telling you over and over and over again it was 19 muslim hijackers - until it becomes urban myth.

  • I am saying the world can do without people like you that make up stuff as they go along. I live in the UK and we have many radical Muslims that are happy to have idiots like you cry foul every time they get caught planing to kill innocent people. I know people that lost family in the London bombings. Try using your own mind to judge the situation on 911 and not Alex fucking fat cunt Jones. Nuff said

  • Have you seen the documentary 7/7 Ripple Effect? Once again there is 100% proof IN YOUR FACE that the bombings were a false-flag operation. And yet on you go blinding yourself with ignorance. You need to do more research.

  • @Focoist911 So do you, John Hill is a nutter.

  • You my friend are a total dysfunctional. We were talking about the Moon landings and I presented to you the fact that the USSR were in on the race and would have cried foul if the knew US was faking the Moon landings. But like a typical religious fanatic you changed the

    subject when presented with evidence that contradicts your bizarre thinking. Stick to the topic or shut your fucking mouth boy.

  • The fact that the evidence of doctoring of the images of Apollo proves that NASA staged moon shoots and yet till this day havn't fessed up to it should tell you, Sir, that the space-race was a multinational enterprise - not a Russia VS the US enterprise.

  • Can you please tell me how old you are and where you were when Apollo landed on the moon. Oh and the no stars seen on the moon thing. Well do you see stars in the daytime. Should they have landed on the unlit side just to take pictures of the stars. The you would have found something else to complain about like why no moon rock or moon dust samples.

  • "Well do you see stars in the daytime"

    You dont see stars in the day-time because the atmosphere disperses the light making the stars imperceptible.

    You keep drawing flawed analogies.

  • You didn't present any evidence that the proofs of faked evidence of Apollo missions are not fake.

    You used something which is called Simple Inductive Generalisation to ignore the argument prima facie. SIG is not a proof, its a hypothesis - and given that we have proof of faked evidences your hypothesis must be wrong because it ignores evidence of faked Apollo.

  • Man you have some serious issues. Why not say there are no stateliest up in the earths orbit and your getting my comments via under ground and sea cable. It's all fake huh. are the Mars landings fake too and Hubble? Who is educating you Ray Comfort?

    "Simple Inductive Generalisation" WTF quit talking like a bitch.

  • Why would satallites, Mars probes, moon probes, Hubble be fake? None of them involved manned space-travel. Thats the problem you're not getting. We dont have the technology to man space missions. No other space-mission has been more than 400km above the ground since Apollo. The second record after Apollo forced a quick decent because they had hit the van-allen radiation belt and were seeing radiation flashing in their brains.

  • @Focoist911 Which mission is this then?

  • @Focoist911 very interesting thread...I declare you the winner for your use of logic and big words. Peace

  • Soooo, they made Apollo 12 boring to get people to stop watching. So that they could make Apollo 13 spectacular and boost "ratings." All to get more money...for more missions...that are really just fake.

    These people need to get a grip on reality.

  • The reason why the camera failed to work was that Al Bean had pointed it at the sun by accident which burnt the videocon tube out after he had climbed down the ladder. There is film footage and pics of the mission. You guys need to do your research!!

  • Footprints are made by feet printed upon a surface, not by air and not by moisture. If there were moisture, then virtually no dust would get kicked up by the astronauts. If there were dry sand in an air-filled enviroment, then

    1) there would have to be dust clouds

    2) the footprints would NOT preserve their shape

    PS: Again, the dust settles immediately after the engines are shut off, because there is NO air.

  • "So is there moisture on the moon? there would have to be."

    No, there would not. Sand grains on earth don't stick o one another, as they have been rounded off through thousands of years of erosion. However, since there is no air or water on the moon, this has never happened to the lunar dust. Thus, the grains on the moon do stick together and retain footprints, BECAUSE their is no moisture or atmosphere on the moon!

  • "Dry sand will not leave a defined footprint on planet earth! "

    Who tells you it has been faked on sand?

  • Take talcum powder for instance. It looks dry - yet if you were to make a pile on the ground and step into it with your runners on for example, then you would leave a footprint because the talcum powder has moisture in it. The moon is not supposed to have any moisture or water so how would a footprint be left in the sand or dust.

  • Alien life isn't implausable. It's highly possible. It's arrogant to think otherwise, regardless of not having the data to prove their existence.

    Just because something is unknown doesn't mean that it's unknowable.

  • The scary thing isn't that there's a secret committee controlling the world. The scary thing is that NOBODY is in control, that inhuman(e) systems of governance & industry run of their own accord. It's not 1 dude sitting behind a desk. It's hundreds of thousands of interests, everyone in his own sphere. Use yr passion for the truth to educate yourself & throw yr critical thinking into making the world a better place.

    Conspiracy theories keep you stupid & focused on minutia that don't matter.

  • Thats they want you to think that you are not in control. BUT you are always in control.

  • neo171171,

    I'm saying that you CAN take control of yr own destiny when y realize that conspiracy theories are projections of yr own subconscious anxieties: a way of telling yrself that there are easy explanations for the injustices in the world, that there are a few "bad apples" gaming the system.

    That's why conspiracy theories SERVE the status quo, b/c they distract people from educating themselves about how the system works, by providing them w/ mythologies.

    It's an opiate, like religion.

  • The truth is out there but its hard to find.

  • You are full of shit! is JFK's murder a projection of my subconscience?

  • " is JFK's murder a projection of my subconscience?"

    No. But when someone devotes obsessive energy to examining and re-examining the minutia of the circumstances behind JFK's murder, it tells you much more about that person's subconscious anxieties than it does about history or political corruption or government secrets.

    I think it makes more sense to call for political action based on all the stuff we DO know about.

    Why bother with theories? So much corruption/dishonesty is out in the open!

  • Fair enough point. Please excuse me.

    However I think that what you say applies to anything.

    For example: the way Thomas Edison obsessed over finding a means of producing light from electricity tells us more about Edison than it does about light bulbs.

  • @idealtypical I thought that was the government, lol,

  • Many of the impulses that animate the views of conspiracy theorists are actually good: skepticism, unwillingness to accept propositions as valid solely on the basis of consensus.

    But the trouble with conspiracy theorists is like the trouble with born-again Christians: having confronted the deficiencies of one orthodoxy, they are seduced by a different "opposing" orthodoxy.

    It's a form of self-centeredness: belief that life can be explained through an overarching system that holds the answers..

  • Here's a question that can be posed to conspiracy theorists fruitfully: Why does it matter so much to you? How would the person's life be changed if it turned out he was right? They will claim that they want to expose the gov't for lying & screwing people somehow. But if this is really the concern, why concentrate on obscure questions that can't be proved? Gov'ts lie & screw people all the time! Poverty, genocide, the arms industry, skyrocketing health insurance, lying a/b WMD to justify a war?

  • I completely agree with all your points.

    My take on why is it important to know? Perhapse curiosity. But mostly because people want the truth and facts. Not cons. All their money going into a lunar research, which was ultimately squandered on special effects.

    Facts matter to people, because that's where progress lies.

    That's why Xtians won't get very far unless they shed their religions. But I digress.

  • The landings were faked. We have many people who are so brainwashed they would believe the government if it told them the sun isn't hot, or water isn't wet.

  • like the chap says at the end of this part look at the evidence carefully dont always believe what you are told by the Media. The moon Hoax was done mostly for political reasons.

    Like what is mentioned in this program if mankind is going to reach the Moon and beyond the technology will have to be far more advanced then a Tin Can.

  • THIS GUY IS ABSOLUTELY RIGHT, THEY ARE NOT PASSIONATE (a natural emotion in such a case)... THEY SHOW THEY ARE HIDING IN FEAR OF BEING CAUGHT... feel so sorry for them and for all of us about this sad things.

  • monitoryou - I want you to see undeniable proof that these moon missions could not be faked.

    See this video -

    watch?v=khDI2MsWSYc&feature=fv­w

    It shows that the footprints must have been made in very fine grain dust to be so sharp and well defined - BUT - this fine dust will get suspended in air if here in atmosphere on Earth.

    Film of the moon shows that EVERY time when dust is kicked up, even the finest particles fall quickly back to the surface - this could only happen in vacuum.

  • There is no reasoning with conspiracy fools. They have their minds made up. Even now that the LRO is sending back images of the Apollo landing sites where you can actually see in the case of the Apollo 14 landing site, foot paths between the lander and scientific equipment experiments.

  • If you walk in dry sand you will not leave a defined footprint..only a hole. You would need moisture to leave a defined footprint. The moon footprint shows the tracks of the underside of the atronauts boot. How do you explain this when the moon has no atmosphere much less water.

  • ilove - "if you walk in dry sand..."

    So are you saying it's mud? Really? How does it magically convert to dry grains and fly up when they shuffle their feet? Can you explain this?

    The lunar surface was described by the astronauts to be very fine, like powder - if you've ever worked with dry cement mix or flour - this sort would leave the well-defined footprints we see everywhere they went on the moon.

  • I don't really get your point here. You are actually correct. Dry sand will not leave a defined footprint on planet earth! This actually proves the footprints must have been made on the moon. In fact, you're giving the answer to your question yourself. The reason why footprints on the moon retain their precise shapes is exactly this: because there is no atmosphere or water on the moon!

  • im simply sayingdry sand will not leave a defined footprint abd there has to be some kind of moisture there in order for the sand to collapse into itself to form a footprint. So is there moisture on the moon? there would have to be.

  • why fake it? stupid question. all the money that was pumped in to this program had to be justified.

  • 7 MISSIONS to the moon. Not just 1.

    LMFAO!

    Why no return for so many years?

  • Obviously, failed attempt to moon allowed technology to progress to today's level- even orbitting beyond satellite distance is advancement back in 1969/70s.

    Richard Hoagland believes NASA has secondary secret space mission w/ way more advance tech'y to go beyond moon.

  • "We came in peace for all mankind"

    That's a crock of shit for a start! Burning little kids in SE Asia etc etc etc etc

  • Astronomers in Britain used a satellite disk aimed at the moon and independently tracked the descent of the LEM on Apollo 11. Did NASA fake that by having a fake LEM land on the moon? What about the Australians? They aimed a dish at the moon and were the ones to receive the video of Armstrong stepping on the moon. Did NASA land a prove and have it stream video signals back down to the Earth? Come on, we did land on the moon. Even the Soviets tracked the landings using their dishes and radar.

  • I want to be a fake lunar astronaut when I grow up!

  • Comment removed

  • who pays for this? the ppl. they lie to.

  • This is a perfect example of what capitalism and a money system create.

  • the moon doesen´t exist. it is an artificial camera for aliens see us all the time. it is good for them to hide.

  • Now the clowns at NASA have turned to the pseudo-science of "Mythbusters" as a method of attempting to quell real research into the Apollo program.

    Actually, Mythbusters has done a dis-service to NASA and its believers by turning the whole charade into a circus.

    We deserve proper scientific investigation into Apollo, and attempts by their hired guns to suppress information will eventually boomerang against them by getting more people to actually ask questions... And rightfully so!

  • @northerntruthseeker Right Mythbusters who r special effects hoaxers for movies & tv fakery.Tricksters. Nasa bows down to Mythbusters and allowsthem to use any & all equipment that they have at any time for any purpose.Both fucking hoaxsters.

  • N.A.S.A. = NAZI

  • The problem is the pride of those who want to believe so strongly in Apollo, EGMAG, that it blinds and cripples their ability to sit down and look at the evidence more closely. Pride makes believers fearful of being wrong. It forces them to defend the lie so adamantly that they resort to insults, slurs, threats, etc against those who have lifted the veil of pride and can see the truth!

    Eventually even those prideful propagandists will come around and ask hard questions, and stop being afraid!

  • One must look at things, esp. govt.-borne projects, pessimistically. In all fields of human endeavor there lies deception. We love mystery & intrigue. Hoaxes survive. Someone should do a story on Clearasil. It's as ineffectual in 2008 as it was in 1975 when I used it.

  • How moronic? Amazing...

    I will not discuss politics, or the zionist/ashkenazi control of our media, government, or money here.. That is important, yes.. But it should be discussed elsewhere.

    These discussions should stay concentrated on the Apollo hoax... Other material can be covered elsewhere.

  • EGMAG... Thanks for your fine comment.

    It is great to see people such as yourself opening your eyes to the deception that these fools have cast upon America and the world for almost 40 years.

    Maybe you could step forward and make your comments available in other moon hoax videos. The propagandists have been trying to smother the truth movement by smearing us in our comments elsewhere. Your input would be refreshing and reinforce our push for the truth!

  • northerntruthseeker for almost 40 years.<<

    I appreciate the reply. Doesn't it seem beyond ridiculous that the moonwalk claimers are so adamant about something? While most of the world can see right through, both logically and intelligently, I mean after 40 years what is it their trying to prove, other than a very expensive farce against the working class has been perpetrated and continues to be so, in claims of future outer space miracles [hrrummph]!

  • What is wrong with the planet is that those that want us in perpetual slavery (YES it is slavery!) know how to use these acts of euphoria, or of fear, as a means of mind control.

    We need to accept the truth about our lives, and fight these monsters head on. Our future is not our own if we do not!

  • 95% of the world knows this and Nasa still thinks it can hide behind lies and what everyone knows already!

    Reason: more government grants for stupid outer orbit projects that are useless and probably fake too' Meanwhile Nasa ceo's collect the billions, and the good government and working people get fooled again.

    Use the money for America not for sick greedy individuals that hoard the peoples money and let them squirm in poverty, and terrorism fears!

  • WHY is it that people do not see the truth?

    Human PRIDE blinds people to not fully understand the implication that Apollo is a massive fake!

    I have stated many times... We have not matured yet as a species to accept the rationalization that most of our history is a bunch of lies. The controllers of us know this, and continue to exploit those that will stick to the lie of Apollo, rather than see the dark truth! I actually feel sorry for the Apollo Believers in this regard.

  • Thanks for uploading it.

  • Marcus Allen rules!!

  • "What else is wrong"?

    Reasons for worlds wars, slavery, the alledge jewish genocide, USS Liberty, 9/11, the Armenian genocide etc, etc. And we find Jews or Ashkenazis behind it all.

  • AzraelEngel2

    IDIOT --Haven't you heard? Jews have been persecuted harshly for centuries.

  • you believe everything you're told I guess...

    Unless you were being sarcastic?

  • AzraelEngel2 (Jews or Ashkenazis behind it all.<<

    Allah is Jewish, you idiot.

  • Thanks for proving again how moronic you are.

  • Adam Buxton did the credits?, didn't he do well... anyways good old Mr Allen there talking about being conned... I wonder how he felt after Scientology?, spiritual racism at it's best!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more