Ron Paul, and Barack Obama are textbooks examples of how we live in a celbrity obsessed culture. Obama is a fucking rockstar becuase hes black, young, articulate, and well....black. Go to any packed arena he talks in and everyone mentions "JFK". Everyone wants to vost for their own JFK even when the civil rights movement is long over. theres nothing to fight for idiots. Paul is a just a liar and a fucking lunatic if he thinks a 18th century foreign policy of isolationistm is going to work.
THIS IS A PENDING APPROVAL. I BET YOU REJECT A LOT OF COMMENTS YOU IGNORANT COCKSUCKER
you dont know what is at stake here. He is defending YOUR rights! dont be crying when the IRS start inflating your expenses and leave you on the streets.
ron paul. typical libertarian. wants government out of his hair...but if the government gets involved by giving subsidies, ron paul thinks government is great. ron paul ain't a libertarian, he's an opportunist, typical politician. and plus, libertarianism is unrealistic anyway, if you study history, psychology and sociology enough, you'll know it won't work in reality
The only thing Paul supporters have to look forward to is that in 9 months, re-don their tin foil hats and return to the safe seclusion of the basement in their parents' house and get back to work on figuring out who really shot JFK.
i thought he spell just fine u r just like tim russert nit picking shit and then u cut it rite off at the in just like fox new edit u guy r about to have ur head on stake
Is'nt it interesting that the poster of this video is an ultra pro-Israeli Jew. Oh yeah, Ron paul does'nt think American boys should die for Israel while Israelis sit around drinking tea. STOP THE WAR FOR THE ISRAELI EMPIRE NOW!! NO MORE MONEY OR TROOPS FOR ISRAEL!! NIce try you Zionist PIG.
"I put them in because I represent people who are asking for some of their money back!"
He treats it like a tax credit and can back up exactly what he's doing and why. If his constituents said no more earmarks, I'll bet it wouldn't happen. He's transparent and representative of those who vote for him.
despite all the trash you might be talking about ron paul. just name one candidate who might be a better choice. you can't. they're all the worst scumbags on earth, much worse than paul. plus you call him a hypocrite, let's just say for the sake of argument he is, which i don't think he is. which politician isn't? so let's say we're picking the lesser evil of the bunch. ron paul wins hands down you ignoramus. Ron paul is where it's at, baby.
Hi there, please note I'm posting on this video on strictly neutral ground. I'm not here to start anything from either side, I just wanted to ask if you could send some of these articles that tie Ron Paul to neo-nazis to my inbox. I see a couple of people that are always writing that Ron Paul is a nazi and Im curious to see when they get it from. Thanks in advance.
Regardless of what you believe, though most of us respectfully disagree with you, the fact of the matter is that Ron Paul wants to dismantle the entire earmark system. Name another candidate who has that kind of determination.
GO SPEND IT WHERE IT SHOULD BE SPENT!!!!?? Like at the pentagon where more than 5 trillion has gone missing over the past five years!? You are a giant asshole.
The budget gets approved and includes an amount for earmarks. This money is going to get spent even if Paul puts in ZERO earmarks. If Paul does not put in any earmarks he will not get reelected, plain and simple. He doesn't want earmarks but he can't fight for liberty if he's not in Congress.
No....when your in the Matrix, you still have to play by the programmers rules. But you fight againts those rules by rising to a position to inable yourself to rewrite the program....not by breaking the rules of the program.
It would be hypocrisy if he voted for the earmarks when he has said he would never vote for an earmark.
Until the Federal government stops taking money from his district, he has the *obligation* to try to recover as much of that money as possible before it is headed elsewhere - and it DOES head elsewhere.
he put in the earmarks and he funneled tons of pork to his district doing so
he has no problem with corporate welfare for his district, he puts in corporate welfare to his district and then tries to hide behind "I didn't vote for it" just like Kerry
Way to go busting Ron Paul skfreespeech...Hillary for President!!! Woo Hoo. What a freaking tool. You put anyone other than Ron Paul on the Republican ticket - you are giving the keys back to the Clintons, you dumbass.
If Hitllary gets in, you can say goodbye to our borders and say hello to the North American Union, Trans Texas Corridor, more out of control immigration, endless wars, bankruptcy of this nation, currency devaluation, the Amero etc. Wake UP!
How do you come to that conclusion? I bet you heard that somewhere....somewhere like FOX, MSNBC,CNN,NBC,CBS,ABC...cause if you studied the numbers yourself, instead of listening to what someones pushing...you'd think different. Please...don't believe me, get involved and find out all about the election ON YOUR OWN! Let it be your MISSION to proove me wrong....PLEASE get personally involved.
You obviously don't understand Paul's answer. He never voted FOR the earmarks. As a congressman, he puts them in because he represents the people. He wishes there werent earmarks at all. The money for earmarks is already collected though, so he's got to get some of tax money back for his constituency.
Well, he goes on to say why he puts earmarks in if you would have gone another min or so. The money will be spent ANYWAY by the executive branch so his job as a REPRESENTATIVE is to get some of it back for his district. He does not like the system, but just like income tax-even though he hates that system- he takes all of his credits.
If Ron Paul feels his job as a representative is to funnel billions in federal spending to his district, that's his corrupt prerogative. But he can stop being a hypocrite about it and pretending he's any different than all the other politicians.
why is freespeech the only one of his kind commenting very combative you are....you should watch the whole video tim wont even let him answer the question because he is scared to argue with someone smarter..and he has to put earmarks in or he would never be elected...think about what an earmark is..its for the people not for ron paul hes trying to give something back to the people..that such a bad thing?
So if he has to put in earmarks to get elected, why not just vote for them? Instead Ron Paul is hypocritically playing both sides, funneling pork and then making a sham of voting against it
He puts them into bills that he plans to vote against anyway (which is most of them). Voting against bills is all or nothing; you can't just vote against the earmark.
He voted against the bill that budgeted the pork in the first place. But once it's in the budget, it's his JOB to bring as much of it back to his own district as possible.
It's like if your office makes everyone chip in for a party and you don't like the menu choices. You still get to eat.
That's like asking someone who is opposed to social security to not collect it even after paying into it for 45 years. The money has been taken from the people and budgeted specifically for the representatives' earmarks. To not bring the money home would be negligent.
Blame the people who wrote and voted for the budget in the first place. Paul is not one of them.
My (maxxed out) SS contributions are specifically set aside for me? I FREAKIN WISH! I'll have to live to be 100 to collect back all the money I'm putting in. Of course, I'll die sooner, so lots of my SS money is going to someone else. But it's in my best interests to live as long as I can to collect back as much of my SS money as I can.
you pay into social security specifically to get back money
you do not pay into the federal government, you pay to fund the federal government which is instead bloated because of congressional pork projects, which includes ron paul's earmarks
"you pay into social security specifically to get back money"
No, I pay into Social Security and I won't get it back at the same rate at which I could get it back if I had invested that money into a MMA, IRA, or, heck, even a CD. Not to mention the fraud of SSA.
he voted against all the earmarks even the ones he added, by which he was saying 'if the pork must fly (which i oppose) then at least bring some back to my district'. he is not a hypocrite, and you're probably an employee of morris/huckleberry. everyone knows rp is the only one with passionate unpaid defenders.
That's not a hypocrite. That's a pragmatist. Did he vote against it or not? You are insinuating that RP voted against his own pork ONLY because he knew it would pass anyway. Evidence please...
You are way off, Ron Paul has to work with the system but will not support the system, so when there is a chance to get money away from the Exucutive Branch and redirect it to The People he takes that chance. He doesn't support the system and wants to change it, in order to really do that he must run for President.
oh please, he's not redirecting money to "The People", he's redirecting money to HIS OWN DISTRICT. That's called pork. Stop trying to put a pretty face on it.
Everyone has to work within the system but Ron Paul has promoted himself as a guy who rejects the system, as Dr. No, except that turns out to be that he's happy to raid the kitty for his own district
Pork is different from Earmarks. Pork is adding more spending 'stealing'. Earmarks is just dividing up what has already been agreed to spend, what was already stolen.
i don't completely disagree, but getting owned is a little harsh. no one has a flawless record, not even ron paul. But he is still the best candidate.
Between his ties to the far right and the far left, his blatant hypocrisy, putting family members on the payroll, an unworkable economic policy and dodging questions,
Ron Paul, and Barack Obama are textbooks examples of how we live in a celbrity obsessed culture. Obama is a fucking rockstar becuase hes black, young, articulate, and well....black. Go to any packed arena he talks in and everyone mentions "JFK". Everyone wants to vost for their own JFK even when the civil rights movement is long over. theres nothing to fight for idiots. Paul is a just a liar and a fucking lunatic if he thinks a 18th century foreign policy of isolationistm is going to work.
curtmastor 3 years ago
THIS IS A PENDING APPROVAL. I BET YOU REJECT A LOT OF COMMENTS YOU IGNORANT COCKSUCKER
you dont know what is at stake here. He is defending YOUR rights! dont be crying when the IRS start inflating your expenses and leave you on the streets.
EnoDude 3 years ago 1472
It was there fault for living on the coastline????? I hope he gets a big texas tornado up his ass tonight.
catbuffalo 3 years ago
I love how from 0:58 to 1:06 you see Ron Paul squirming like the weasel he is.
Excellent clip.
LoonyRonPaul 3 years ago
this fuck voluntarily left a lucrative, successful business a doctor!
multi millionaire!
why would you or i leave a million dollars a year job to make 400,000 thousand????
because he will sell his own soul and all peoples lives to make even more money!
he has stated that in denials of funds for small farmers.
if this demon is elected president - gw will look like jesus compared to this rich fuck wanting and willing to work for more
listen up farmers and anyone who eats food
he's a scroog
boilingmadatpolitici 4 years ago
Ron Paul is truly a uniter - he unites liberals and conservatives in fighting his incredibly ridiculous candidacy.
The Bipartisan War on Paultards marches on!
LoonyRonPaul 4 years ago
oh ronnie pooh.
19770326 4 years ago
ron paul. typical libertarian. wants government out of his hair...but if the government gets involved by giving subsidies, ron paul thinks government is great. ron paul ain't a libertarian, he's an opportunist, typical politician. and plus, libertarianism is unrealistic anyway, if you study history, psychology and sociology enough, you'll know it won't work in reality
chrispollock 4 years ago
The only thing Paul supporters have to look forward to is that in 9 months, re-don their tin foil hats and return to the safe seclusion of the basement in their parents' house and get back to work on figuring out who really shot JFK.
mts1583 4 years ago
liessssssssss
Strikeaction7 4 years ago
no YOU are a slimey Hypocrit.
I hope those blinders fit you well.
Why do you not just create a forum where only your thoughts count?
OH nevermind
.. you just did.
Ron Paul cured my apathy!
RooFx 4 years ago 29
too bad Ron Paul couldn't cure your spelling
skfreespeech 4 years ago
i thought he spell just fine u r just like tim russert nit picking shit and then u cut it rite off at the in just like fox new edit u guy r about to have ur head on stake
bubbi316 4 years ago 22
Ron Paul is right & Russert is wrong!
As Ron Paul said and I quote:
"The whole system is corrupt"
Not only is the system corrupt but the media is bias.
Russert you're an embarrassment but then again you never claimed to be fair or balanced.
PAtravler57 4 years ago 50
so you're saying that Ron Paul is corrupt too?
skfreespeech 4 years ago
Is'nt it interesting that the poster of this video is an ultra pro-Israeli Jew. Oh yeah, Ron paul does'nt think American boys should die for Israel while Israelis sit around drinking tea. STOP THE WAR FOR THE ISRAELI EMPIRE NOW!! NO MORE MONEY OR TROOPS FOR ISRAEL!! NIce try you Zionist PIG.
PopsMcKracken 4 years ago 15
what do your ravings about Jews have to do with Ron Paul stealing from the taxpayers?
BTW it's not news to anyone that the Ron Paul campaign base is Neo-nazis
skfreespeech 4 years ago
PopsMcKracken: You should have stopped when you said, "Ron paul does'nt think"
captainrojahz 4 years ago 8
Ron Paul supporters post this interview yet it doesn't make him look good. No true Rep would vote for him
ListenForTruth 4 years ago
Watch Ron Paul polls numbers fall.
ListenForTruth 4 years ago
"I put them in because I represent people who are asking for some of their money back!"
He treats it like a tax credit and can back up exactly what he's doing and why. If his constituents said no more earmarks, I'll bet it wouldn't happen. He's transparent and representative of those who vote for him.
schausm 4 years ago 23
it's not a tax credit, that's a dishonest comparison... it's like claiming welfare is just like a tax credit
Ron Paul is not getting tax credits for his district, he's adding pork for his district and then making a show of not voting for it
the pork he is adding has no connection to the tax money from his district
skfreespeech 4 years ago
despite all the trash you might be talking about ron paul. just name one candidate who might be a better choice. you can't. they're all the worst scumbags on earth, much worse than paul. plus you call him a hypocrite, let's just say for the sake of argument he is, which i don't think he is. which politician isn't? so let's say we're picking the lesser evil of the bunch. ron paul wins hands down you ignoramus. Ron paul is where it's at, baby.
yuhoo7 4 years ago 24
so your campaign slogan is Vote Ron Paul - the Lesser Evil
how about not voting for a candidate with ties to neo-nazis?
skfreespeech 4 years ago
Hi there, please note I'm posting on this video on strictly neutral ground. I'm not here to start anything from either side, I just wanted to ask if you could send some of these articles that tie Ron Paul to neo-nazis to my inbox. I see a couple of people that are always writing that Ron Paul is a nazi and Im curious to see when they get it from. Thanks in advance.
-Juan
MononofuBlood 4 years ago
Watch Paul supporters do their customary page-long equivocation. Watch his ranking plunge further once more see this interview.
ListenForTruth 4 years ago
You are suggesting that Dr. Paul should let the government to keep his district's money and use it for political reasons?
TullFanFTW 4 years ago 19
it's not his "district's money", stop peddling that lie
it's the taxpayer's money and instead of being spent where it should be, it's being spent on shrimp fishing
skfreespeech 4 years ago
Regardless of what you believe, though most of us respectfully disagree with you, the fact of the matter is that Ron Paul wants to dismantle the entire earmark system. Name another candidate who has that kind of determination.
TullFanFTW 4 years ago 15
if Ron Paul honestly wanted to dismantle earmarks, he wouldn't be exploiting it to funnel pork back to his district
skfreespeech 4 years ago
GO SPEND IT WHERE IT SHOULD BE SPENT!!!!?? Like at the pentagon where more than 5 trillion has gone missing over the past five years!? You are a giant asshole.
PopsMcKracken 4 years ago
like spending it to help the victims of Katrina instead of on pork for Ron Paul's buddies
skfreespeech 4 years ago
The budget gets approved and includes an amount for earmarks. This money is going to get spent even if Paul puts in ZERO earmarks. If Paul does not put in any earmarks he will not get reelected, plain and simple. He doesn't want earmarks but he can't fight for liberty if he's not in Congress.
alexpasch 4 years ago 19
so basically you're saying Ron Paul has to violate his "principles" and add on pork in order to get elected
like I said he's a slimy hypocrite
skfreespeech 4 years ago
No....when your in the Matrix, you still have to play by the programmers rules. But you fight againts those rules by rising to a position to inable yourself to rewrite the program....not by breaking the rules of the program.
TonyPensacotti 4 years ago 4
the Matrix? This is real life not another Wachowski brothers movie
I can't wait to see what revelations you people mine from Speed Racer
skfreespeech 4 years ago
If he doesn't take the money, IT GETS SPENT ANYWAY. This is the best the MSM can do.
musak6969 4 years ago 7
so if it gets spent anyway, it's okay for Ron Paul to toss aside the principles he never had and grab some
skfreespeech 4 years ago
It would be hypocrisy if he voted for the earmarks when he has said he would never vote for an earmark.
Until the Federal government stops taking money from his district, he has the *obligation* to try to recover as much of that money as possible before it is headed elsewhere - and it DOES head elsewhere.
audib13 4 years ago 9
he put in the earmarks and he funneled tons of pork to his district doing so
he has no problem with corporate welfare for his district, he puts in corporate welfare to his district and then tries to hide behind "I didn't vote for it" just like Kerry
Hypocrite!
skfreespeech 4 years ago
Way to go busting Ron Paul skfreespeech...Hillary for President!!! Woo Hoo. What a freaking tool. You put anyone other than Ron Paul on the Republican ticket - you are giving the keys back to the Clintons, you dumbass.
babaprad 4 years ago
Ron Paul = Hillary for President
He's a spoiler candidate meant to get the Clintons to power
skfreespeech 4 years ago
You people are way off base.
If Hitllary gets in, you can say goodbye to our borders and say hello to the North American Union, Trans Texas Corridor, more out of control immigration, endless wars, bankruptcy of this nation, currency devaluation, the Amero etc. Wake UP!
Ron Paul or bust!
BASSGUY01 4 years ago 10
Ron Paul is the best hope Hillary has of winning the election by splitting the Republican base
skfreespeech 4 years ago
if paul didnt run 4 prez, what would be differnet now? would romney still be in the running? rudy?
i liked ur comment comparing paul to nader btw. interesting.
jjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjo 4 years ago
How do you come to that conclusion? I bet you heard that somewhere....somewhere like FOX, MSNBC,CNN,NBC,CBS,ABC...cause if you studied the numbers yourself, instead of listening to what someones pushing...you'd think different. Please...don't believe me, get involved and find out all about the election ON YOUR OWN! Let it be your MISSION to proove me wrong....PLEASE get personally involved.
TonyPensacotti 4 years ago
use your common sense, Ron Paul is a fringe candidate being pushed up with positions meant to split Republicans
Ron Paul is the Ralph Nader of 2008 only aimed at the Republican party
why do you think the media is really giving him all this air time?
skfreespeech 4 years ago
You obviously don't understand Paul's answer. He never voted FOR the earmarks. As a congressman, he puts them in because he represents the people. He wishes there werent earmarks at all. The money for earmarks is already collected though, so he's got to get some of tax money back for his constituency.
chiznaddy 4 years ago 12
He put in pork for his district. And then he has the nerve to attack aid to the victims of Hurricane Katrina.
He didn't need to vote for them because HE PUT THEM IN THERE IN THE FIRST PLACE
skfreespeech 4 years ago
Well, he goes on to say why he puts earmarks in if you would have gone another min or so. The money will be spent ANYWAY by the executive branch so his job as a REPRESENTATIVE is to get some of it back for his district. He does not like the system, but just like income tax-even though he hates that system- he takes all of his credits.
roflwofl89 4 years ago 7
If Ron Paul feels his job as a representative is to funnel billions in federal spending to his district, that's his corrupt prerogative. But he can stop being a hypocrite about it and pretending he's any different than all the other politicians.
skfreespeech 4 years ago
why is freespeech the only one of his kind commenting very combative you are....you should watch the whole video tim wont even let him answer the question because he is scared to argue with someone smarter..and he has to put earmarks in or he would never be elected...think about what an earmark is..its for the people not for ron paul hes trying to give something back to the people..that such a bad thing?
Greedy37 4 years ago 6
So if he has to put in earmarks to get elected, why not just vote for them? Instead Ron Paul is hypocritically playing both sides, funneling pork and then making a sham of voting against it
Russet is dead on, IT'S KERRY ALL OVER AGAIN
skfreespeech 4 years ago
He puts them into bills that he plans to vote against anyway (which is most of them). Voting against bills is all or nothing; you can't just vote against the earmark.
He voted against the bill that budgeted the pork in the first place. But once it's in the budget, it's his JOB to bring as much of it back to his own district as possible.
It's like if your office makes everyone chip in for a party and you don't like the menu choices. You still get to eat.
relhak 4 years ago 9
it doesn't matter if he votes against it since the bills pass anyway AND HE PUT IN THE EARMARKS
it's a phony charade to put in the earmarks and then collect the dough while claiming to be "opposed to them"
skfreespeech 4 years ago
That's like asking someone who is opposed to social security to not collect it even after paying into it for 45 years. The money has been taken from the people and budgeted specifically for the representatives' earmarks. To not bring the money home would be negligent.
Blame the people who wrote and voted for the budget in the first place. Paul is not one of them.
relhak 4 years ago 32
when you pay into social security, you're taking the money that is specifically put away for you
Ron Paul is denying money for the victims of Hurricane Katrina but directing pork to his district
skfreespeech 4 years ago
My (maxxed out) SS contributions are specifically set aside for me? I FREAKIN WISH! I'll have to live to be 100 to collect back all the money I'm putting in. Of course, I'll die sooner, so lots of my SS money is going to someone else. But it's in my best interests to live as long as I can to collect back as much of my SS money as I can.
relhak 4 years ago 4
you pay into social security specifically to get back money
you do not pay into the federal government, you pay to fund the federal government which is instead bloated because of congressional pork projects, which includes ron paul's earmarks
skfreespeech 4 years ago
I fully agree with you skfreespeech
rosettastonedagain 4 years ago
"you pay into social security specifically to get back money"
No, I pay into Social Security and I won't get it back at the same rate at which I could get it back if I had invested that money into a MMA, IRA, or, heck, even a CD. Not to mention the fraud of SSA.
msgibbons 4 years ago 617
he voted against all the earmarks even the ones he added, by which he was saying 'if the pork must fly (which i oppose) then at least bring some back to my district'. he is not a hypocrite, and you're probably an employee of morris/huckleberry. everyone knows rp is the only one with passionate unpaid defenders.
RL36D 4 years ago 60
"by which he was saying 'if the pork must fly (which i oppose) then at least bring some back to my district'. he is not a hypocrite,"
This is the EXACT definition of a hypocrite
skfreespeech 4 years ago
That's not a hypocrite. That's a pragmatist. Did he vote against it or not? You are insinuating that RP voted against his own pork ONLY because he knew it would pass anyway. Evidence please...
CribNotes 4 years ago 34
You are way off, Ron Paul has to work with the system but will not support the system, so when there is a chance to get money away from the Exucutive Branch and redirect it to The People he takes that chance. He doesn't support the system and wants to change it, in order to really do that he must run for President.
Carlitos1010 4 years ago 6
oh please, he's not redirecting money to "The People", he's redirecting money to HIS OWN DISTRICT. That's called pork. Stop trying to put a pretty face on it.
Everyone has to work within the system but Ron Paul has promoted himself as a guy who rejects the system, as Dr. No, except that turns out to be that he's happy to raid the kitty for his own district
skfreespeech 4 years ago
'His own district' is made up of THE PEOPLE he represents!
audib13 4 years ago 17
every single congressman who spends taxpayer money on pork for his own district can say that... and does
skfreespeech 4 years ago
Pork is different from Earmarks. Pork is adding more spending 'stealing'. Earmarks is just dividing up what has already been agreed to spend, what was already stolen.
RonPauladvocate 4 years ago 7
so you're saying that it's okay because Ron Paul is just dividing up part of the loot that was already stolen?
lame
skfreespeech 4 years ago
i don't completely disagree, but getting owned is a little harsh. no one has a flawless record, not even ron paul. But he is still the best candidate.
bo0jah 4 years ago 5
Between his ties to the far right and the far left, his blatant hypocrisy, putting family members on the payroll, an unworkable economic policy and dodging questions,
he's a terrible candidate
skfreespeech 4 years ago
watched this show live myself,and that's not the way i heard it...dr paul explained himself sufficiently,i thought
eenkmouse2311 4 years ago 11
people can see for themselves
skfreespeech 4 years ago
tim is a skull and cross bones whore ron paul for president
sm21663 4 years ago 8
paranoia! paranoia! it's the bread and butter of ron paul supporters
skfreespeech 4 years ago