Added: 2 years ago
From: AlJazeeraEnglish
Views: 7,403
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Send this guy (Zalmay Khalilzad) back to afghanistan he'll have people running to the taliban he'll be a great advertisement for the taliban what a joke!!! he even looks like a slimey, lying peice of turd!

  • the usual afghan men returning to loot or betray afghanistan the usual betrayal of afghanistan afghans who ran from the country have done nothing but loot the country here is another sell out who loots tortures and robs afghans what a shame how sad khouroson is a land of honest brave men yet these sell outs have killed many of them or they have been locked up.

  • this dirty slave of pig-jews-american dirty-pigs do not have any rights in AFGHANISTAN.......WE AFGHANS WANT THE REAL AGHANS NOT SLAVE JEW-PIGS-AMERICAN PIGS!!!!!!!!!!

  • I like it, they are all Afghans, and they get involved in their countries affairs, its all good, even though they may be millionairs and alcoholics, but they are Afghans and I support them.

  • This guy is an american citizen and american diplomat, does he have any right to get involved in the Afghan politics and decide what is right or wrong for us or by us Afghans? This all tells me alot about about who we Afghans have become. Shall any dog and a puppet have the right to rule us? lets wake up and get united. We Afghans belong to great civilization, we were a great people before humans lived in these countries that are trying to turn us to their fighting dogs. Lets wake up.

  • this guy was away from afghanistan for 40 years he has no say or rights about afghanistan

    shame on you watanfroosh kailzad is a trader and an american puppet

  • i think if we bring a yahud he may do something better than these motherfucker watan foroshes all of them .

  • They were very happy and they are saying they are in discuss with their people to be candidated, but now the left the political scene and the one who can resist as he done in three decades is DR. Abdullah Abdullah.

  • salam bar hame ham watanen afghan

    i thing he is not good for persiden in afghanistan we are needen somone who working not for pashtun not for tajik not for hazare not for huzback . someone who working for alle afghan peopel in plz dont tering to fight echander we are sind alle moslim we have only one book only quran dont sag iam tajik iam pashun in iam azare we are alle sind only afghan in muslaman

  • all watan forosh.they have eaten the bloodshed and the raw human meats.all hatrates.fuk you all.

  • This means the US has selcted Jalali to be the next president of Afghanistan

  • Khalilzad is responsible for the bloodshed , increasing of terrorism , he is the man who brought the mafia drug dealrs to the country. he himself is a bigg mafia who indirectly do opium business.

  • one thing i would like to say vatandar if god bring profit Mohamed back to be our president we will say he is bad so i do not know who is good????

  • no no you are wrong if Prophit muhammad (pbuh) comes it will be our lucky day , anyway Afghanistan is destroyed by people like Khalilzad , they have already given their test.

  • THE FUTURE BELONG TO AFGHANS.

    They run over the Indian subcontinent long before the Brits, endured decades of warfare and won. Afghans are starting to shine as a nation of intelectuals that are starting to change the politics of this region.

    Historicaly Afghans are seen as supperiors of south central Asia, there will always be people who will work against them.

    For the Afghans though it time not to fall in the foolish traps, but to concentrate & develop to their full potencial, tik tak

  • Absolutely true.

  • Poor country my ass, there are more poor people in India, other Middle Eastern countries and even Europe then in Afghanistan. Afghanistan is full of rich, some millionaire or mini millionairs, but the life style they loive just doesnt reflect that. Khalilzad and Jalali are 2 of 10's and thousands of such people of Afghanistan. The good thing is they are doing something for their Country for change.

  • @dilsozak:

    we shouldn't take the issues so easy, I am sure you would have or have said the same thing about the russian too. But the ground reality is that they were defeated. I am not sure why can't you see the other puppets in the vedio: I donot think Helal, Abdullah Abdullah, Rabani, Qanoni... are pashtoon, not naming them implies on your racist attitude.

    Be always logical rather than emotional.

  • West does not want to elimnate Taliban. Taliban is the only justification for the west to Stay in Afghanistan, so how can they eliminate them. It is just a part of the game, and the so called self declared leaders, mostly pashtun racists, such as khalilzad, Ahadi, Jalali, Ashraf Ghani, they are a very low lever puppet of U.S, trying to make money out of the poor people's blood. And whoever implies the U.S policies in Afghanistan in a better way, will be the next president of the country.

  • *Applies?

    but I agree, imagine a Western Nation having their leader chosen in a foreign country!

    These double standards about "democracy" make US commitments to self-determination.

    "We will support you, but you have to sell out your own people and permit foreign troops to occupy and kill your people"

    Yay for "Democracy". If the majority of people in a given nation want invading troops to leave, then they should leave.

    US troops come home! Stop the wars!!

  • It's not the 'West' it's the United States, the goal has always been Iraq; they justified that through Afghanistan, to stay in Iraq they need to remain in Afghanistan. All these faux intellectuals are, quite correctly, 'lower lever(l?) puppets'

  • Taliban are terrorist s

  • US soldiers are terrorists

  • NAAAH! Wrong.

  • The "terrorists" of which you speak were former CIA-funded "freedom-fighters"

    If these people are so evil, WHY did the US fund them barely 20 years ago??

    In my life-time I saw these people go from Freedom-Fighters to Terrorists.

    US involvement in the Middle-East, Latin America etc. since the 1980's is by every definition terrorism.

    Violence to achieve political objectives is a tactic, you can't win a war against it. Violence leads to more violence = endless war...

  • Thats because USA is superior to all the other countries in the middle east

  • So when is AlJazeera going to ask the taliban hard straight foward questions about their future plans to improve Afganistan?

  • Neither the Taliban NOR the US/NATO occupation want to improve Afghanistan.

    Then again the US created the Taliban's infrastructure, gave them weapons, training and money.

  • Ya right buddy try the ISI. They created the taliban so its poetic justice that pakistan is suffering so much for it now. The talibans plan for Afganistan is to live like its the dark ages.

  • CIA -> ISI -> Taliban

    CIA funded the Taliban by way of the ISI so the US could claim no responsibility.

    The US/NATO-supported Warlords are even worse than the Taliban!

  • Haha...my friend im loving this! So the ISI gets its hands on US funds and it becomes our fault for them inventing the taliban? Like I said before its great to see pakistan itself suffering the same violence and instability it wanted to inflict on other people when PAKISTAN created the taliban. Keep blaming America as truck bombs made and driven by pakis keep blowing up and killing other pakis. I swear you people are the dumbest most backward people in the world.

  • Thanks Mr.e-intellecto-thug.

  • Ya its big fuckin super conspiracy feindishly designed to eliminate the meal known as dinner!...your so clever and saw through the lies..........how did you do it?

  • With or without dinner, you're still a fucking idiot

  • if any one has read my comment on previews vedio about afghanistan which I said ( this is America who votes not afghan people ) so this vedio is the of proves that

  • If those troops go to enforcing security and stopping the bombings, then they'll be useful.

  • What business does the U.S. have in "choosing" Afghanistan's president? Maybe we'd be doing better if they had chosen ours.

  • Agreed. Only the Afghan public can choose the president in August.

  • LOL, could have took at better interest year ago. Oh yeah I forgot about Iraq. Whats gonna happen is half victories in Iraq and Afghanistan. You could say peace with honor.

  • iraq yeah but afghanistan? lol US general said we r getting defeated here just some days ago.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more