I'd like to see someone do this with a really emotional book, whether its a tragedy, horror, love or whatever just to see their reactions go by in a second
SUCKER... I fuckin bought that self-study course, and WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED? NOTHING. I tried to "PhotoRead" some books, What happened? Fuckin nothing. IT'S ALL SKIMMING. Basically, all of the system consists of pure skimming and nothing more.
Before Buying it, please check more information about it online, or, better still, Download it as a torrent, if it works, yohoo! go and buy it, If it does not, then don't waste your time and money!
Hey I can read the entire Bible in about 15 minutes by turning every page. Just... I don't have enough hard drive space or RAM in my brain to record the information. Too bad I read a 1800 page book and didn't remember it all at the same time. Oh well.
The Rainman, (may he rest in peace) could not even read that fast, and the majority of his brain was wired to do just that, from birth. So your telling me someone who does'nt have half the brain power of the Rainman could out do him. YEA RIGHT! Go on Oprah an prove it.
I would recommend checking the other more down-to-earth videos on PhotoReading. That's what I did before signing up for a Photoreading course and I've been benefiting from it... even though I am no where close to 693k wpm. I can post links in this comment but do a YouTube search for "Paul Scheele" and "Photo Reading". Hope this helps you :)
A claim like 693,000 wpm could be a scam. But as regular human beings, any improvement we can harness from Photoreading is definitely a plus. I've been through a 2 day Photoreading course & I can share that it's no scam. It does take a lot of practice 2 increase one's effective comprehension rate. I'd recommend not being distracted by a wild 693k claim as this (even if it's true...) & go check out a Photoreading course.
The "10% of our brains" theory is a myth based on a misquote from Einstein.
Also, this is so obviously a scam. I could easily make a video like this. There is NO indication other than the reporter's word that suggests that this guy didn't already read the book. Those two answers could be done by any Charles Dicken's fan I'm sure.
It's a scam. I saw a reporter do this and he "Photoread" the material once and couldn't remember anything. But they said he had to read it again just a bit slower. And then again a bit slower. And again a bit slower. By the end of the 5th reading he remembered bits and pieces.
If this was real, don't you think every student in America (and the world) would be taught this method of reading? Of course! That is your proof right there that this is a scam.
"OH YOU ANSWERED 2 QUESTIONS ABOUT A BOOK OMFG OMFG!"... Definitely an infomercial, definitely as much a scam as all the random weight-loss products. It wouldn't be that hard to memorize 2 questions. And was that even a book? It was only 10 paragraphs with double spacing...
So his live testimonials of people saying they have seen him do this many times are also fake? Why don't you take it to court since it is illegal to make false testimonials?
Now my biggest question is i have studied in institutions for talented kids because of my abilities in the subjects learned in school.
Now the acedemy that i attend is pretty small, and i know of no one at this acedemy that are reading at this speed. So why is this place not crowded. Which such an ability you could become an expert in most fields in no time at all.
that is if the brain actually takes a photo and all information is stored, which i highly doubt.
Can you explain to me how the attainment of knowledge makes one an expert? In business, for instance, you have an entire group of people exposed to the same information yet 20% of them will make 80% of the sales.
my brother who had tryd this for a week is starting to work for him!
at the start when i 1st heard about this , i was thinking .. what da f*k ? , this got to be a joke, how could you read 693,000 words per minute without realising?
Alright people, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to tell this is fake. These are two very, very basic questions about the book that Peter could have easily memorized prior to appearing in this infomercial.
@Malicension First of all yes your abseloutly right the test shown here is structered in a horrible fashion. If this was to be proven he should NOT chose a popular book, and the test should be done with as many diffrent "rare" books as possible to test if then could answer a LIST of very precise questions. To fully test it you should have a range of how precise the information was.
Now do YOU provide any proof that its a scam, no. You don't show that the brain is not capable of doing this.
@Malicension So you saying that this is scam and untrue right off the bat, is the same thing they are doing but in reverse.
Now does this mean that its true just because you don´t have the knowledge to prove it, ofcourse not, then god would be true aswell just because we can't prove it wrong.
All i am saying is: your frist observation is great, but the second statement makes you the same as the people who promote this method. Study the brain and the claims then decide :)
@SadegoGG I have no idea what that sentence is supposed to mean? please explain if you desire too. But i would see my method to be fair. But if you got something better please do explain friend.
Well apparently you haven't studied anything in the basis of working as a team or actually achieving something on the magnitude of developing the faculties of your mind. It would take far too long for me to teach the entire Mastermind concept to you through youtube, especially with the character limitations.
Also, your point is not in any way valid since the brain is not what thinks. The mind thinks. The brain is an electronic switching station that creates emotions.
Basically I gave you a strategy that is typically used by top executives/hopefully any employees to work with other people at specifically dated times to share goals, experiences, and as a way to stay committed to working at something everyday. Then to actually perform the training to determine whether or not it works rather than your limited belief system that is full of paradigms that object with this idea. You can't tell if something is possible until you change your paradigm.
@SadegoGG Ehmm once more all i heard was alot of nonsense that boiled down too: Have a number of people do this experiment so that we can collect more data from diffrent people.
So all your saying is: use more people.
i don't see why it is nessecary to be so rude, all i am saying is that your earlier sentence made no sense, and i would like to have an explanation. and thank you for giving me one. Still my example would be usuable. The only change you offer is more people.
Nope, not at all. I was saying get a group of people together that meet regularly which indeed will give a larger sample size, but it will also improve each individuals chances of success significantly. Just working with one other people would make one 11 times as likely to succeed. And yes, my sentence made perfect sense...its your ignorance that is making you not understand it. Why don't you go pick up a good book on Master Minding before saying the things you say about it.
@SadegoGG I am sorry the sentence you made did not make any sense at all. That depends on ofcourse what criteria we set for what is acceptable or not. But enough about that.
We are not really interested in having this succeed by any means possible in the first test. In the first test they should be no evaluations because that is not in the program. First we need to test it following it point to point. And if that won´t work we need to use extended knowledge to try and make it work.
I've bought 2 books about photoreading,,,,,,,,,,, I've read both and tried really hard,,,,,,,,doesn't work at all,,,,,,and even it does,,,,it's pointless, u cant enjoy the book!
Photoreading does work because i took the course and know how it works, i was taught by Mykal Pinder in london. If you have any questions i will answer them.
@yuoooo4, the home study course is about 200 pound, but i don't recommend it because there is lots of questions it doesn't answer. I was taught by a photoreading instructor in london and he was able to answer all my questions, the course was 375 pound and was taught over 2 days.
somehow I imagine that if you gave him a book of your choice, you would quickly come up with a new excuse not to believe it instead of looking into the subject and doing some research.
For example: you would simply say. "Damnit, I chose a book you must have already read".
HOW DO YOU EVER KNOW IF THE PERSON HAS ALREADY READ THE BOOK. You can always be pessimistic without being realistic.
The "10% of our brains" theory is a myth based on a misquote from Einstein.
Also, this is so obviously a scam. I could easily make a video like this. There is NO indication other than the reporter's word that suggests that this guy didn't already read the book. Those two answers could be done by any Charles Dicken's fan I'm sure.
The "10% of our brains" theory is a myth based on a misquote from Einstein.
Also, this is so obviously a scam. I could easily make a video like this. There is NO indication other than the reporter's word that suggests that this guy didn't already read the book. Those two answers could be done by any Charles Dicken's fan I'm sure.
The "10% of our brains" theory is a myth based on a misquote from Einstein.
Also, this is so obviously a scam. I could easily make a video like this. There is NO indication other than the reporter's word that suggests that this guy didn't already read the book. Those two answers could be done by any Charles Dicken's fan I'm sure.
U guys didnt do much 4 research. U looked up the 1st sceptic scientific journal and case closed cause it sounded smart.
The truth of the matter is that our brains work under the forces of electric and electro-magnetic energies. These energies can increase and decrease greatly. This is where we get into Kundalini. Or, as u would like 2 call them, subtle electrical + electromagnetic pulses.
We know thats what "brain activity" means. So, differnece between clarity + stress.
I don't quite understand the knee-jerk skepticism about photo reading.
If you're familiar with the extraordinary abilities of ' savants ' , you may recall people who can see a photo once, then proceed to draw, in total detail, the entire picture, be it of a cityscape, or whatever. Is that to be dismissed as impossible too, simply because we don't yet understand the process..?
The human mind is capable of extraordinary things, without too much tweaking. We only use a fraction of it.
< It's a matter of learning techniques & practise. Though I'm almost too lazy to scratch my ass, I'm damn sure I could grasp this procedure and increase my reading skills multiple times if I underwent relevant training. As could most everyone commenting on this video.
P.s. The guy doing the reading is not a scammer. He is closely involved with Learning Strategies ( a US company ) that uses NLP & other mind-tools for self-development. Google the name for more info if you remain unconvinced :)
Win Wenger ( Google him and check out his site), one of the world's experts on education, trained with Peter Bisonette, the reader in this video. He swears to me that he has seen this man do this many times with any book presented to him.
He also told me that going to the seminar gives abetter chance to learn it than on your own. I am going .. I have no connection with these people and remain open and skeptical. Will report back to you later.
fake ... seems to me that photo reading is in fact scanning the book. In Teach yourself speed reading passive reading looks a lot like what that guy just did , but it is used to highlight the words that stand out , decide if the language is technical, and to make note of where are the key arguments.
they just make it look like you can read a book in 15 seconds
PhRing is literally a technique among the rest of techniques in the Whole Mind System. The concept of phring a book is no different then knowing by second nature where every one of your own possessions in your home is. you see a gorgeous girl once and you won't forget what she wore and her contours regardless that the first thing youd probably do is picture her naked. another big thing of phring is your intuition. when you do want something from your room you find is w/o looking at it directly
i think a better starting point would be to prove that it actually works. Based on your theory i could say that i can fly and if no one is able to disprove this then it is the truth!!!
Actually it's the other way around. Despite the fact that thousands of individuals have developed this ability (Of course some of them think they have developed it, when they indeed have not but this is a rather advanced subject for someone of your intelligence.) Moving on, isn't it impressive MLB players know JUST When and how to release the ball to move at the speed, movement, accuracy they command the ball to move with? How's that more impressive than this?
Furthermore, you're absolutely retarded if you don't know gravity completely disproves your claim, thus you can't fly. Also, what you said about the two ended proof system is a fallacy, like I discussed in my initial comment. How in any way did I say it surely existed because you can't disprove it?
How do figures such as Derren Brown manipulate people's minds to steal televisions, or freeze in place? Subliminal triggering can do amazing things, and photo reading can possibly exist, this guydidit
@SadegoGG Use of the word "retard" in an otherwise, somewhat-intelligent argument makes you look dumb. Throwing a Ball and a Magician have nothing to do with your silly photo-reading system. Further more, you seem that you're unsure as to what you think in the matter because thousands of people out of 6 billion people have a mysterious "ability".
How many people have actually applied the program and failed? Can you give me any documentation that this has even happened before saying a majority of students fail? Also, it is obvious that rich people develop multiple sources of income...yet the average individual only has one source of income. The masses in no way represent human potential, as most of them are too lazy to even achieve financial abundance. People are programmed to be lazy and to be ignorant through paradigms.
@SadegoGG Rich people.. you're kidding me right? People in power disregard people's lives for a profit, that's why terrible things like Bhopal and the BP oil spill happened. You're telling me that a "majority of the students fail"? Where do you get your data? Regardless of what you think, laziness has never applied to amount of income just like people failing to learn something does not apply to the thing they've learned actually working. 6 billion people cannot all be rich.
What gave you the idea that 6 billion people can't all achieve financial abundance? Have you actually studied the attainment of wealth? There used to be entire cultures and/or countries with a small enough number of financially abundant individuals the one could count them all on their hands. In todays industrial societies, there are hundreds of thousands of millionaires.
Can you explain how if everyone provides more service than they are payed for not everyone can be 'rich'.
Also, can you explain to me how Anthony Robbins disregards people's lives for profit? Just because there are a few people at the top who use their money for power doesn't mean all rich people, or even a majority of rich people, do also.
@SadegoGG First Anthony Robbins.. I googled that name and the first thing that came up was "SELFHELP" Which is a scam in itself. Also, if 6 billion people gained finacial abundance (Which a majority DO NOT have a chance) They would no longer be rich. Rich would be the new poor if you haven't connected the dots. See "Inflation". Also in the example you give the rich people are even hurting each other. (see Tony Robbins on Wikipedia under "Lawsuits"). Now stop spamming your nonsense on this page.
How did you deduce self help is a scam? Are Anthony Robbin's testimonials from high corporate executives, professional athletes, and individuals who have achieved their goals all fake? Do you honestly believe you are performing at your peak when people like Bill Gates have billions of dollars? Are you also saying Bob Proctor's testimonials and the individuals who have talked with him discussing their results also fake and made up?
And who gave you the idea not 6 billion people can be rich? If people earn less money through service than they are providing others then spend that money on something of more value than they are paying, an infinite number of individuals can become rich. If you want to discuss this issue further, I recommend you actually study it first since this issue has absolutely nothing to do with inflation. Also, the first lawsuit is not applicable to the material Robbins teaches.
@SadegoGG You. You "gave me the idea". You specifically said "Who said 6 billion people can't reach financial abundance?" Abundance being "the property of a more than adequate quantity or supply" and rich being "Wealth is the abundance of valuable resources or material possessions or the control of such assets". Now I'm assuming you meant "can" and not "can't" in the first statement. Rich becomes poor as inflation happens, there is more money printed thus products get more expensive.
Its unfortunate that you in no way understand money. First of all, you don't get money from the business you work for, it comes through the business. You get your money from an infinite supply. The quantity of money you earn is determined by the amount of service you render. And as one attains money, that money is either put in a bank or spent so someone else can now spend it. Inflation has absolutely nothing to do with this concept, since anyone can make as much $ as they want.
@SadegoGG You obviously have no understanding of money, based on Supply and Demand as you gain more supply to meet the demand it becomes worth less, 1 dollar now will NOT be worth the money it is currently in 10 years. Stop trollin' you should know this from Highschool, or even elementary. Regardless of how much money comes "through" the buisiness its just going to be worth less the more is printed since now a days you can't exchange it for gold (due to the 1930s and the government)
Let me teach you the basics of this principle at a first grade level.
If you have one dollar and you trade it and who you trade it to trades it instantly and this goes on forever that one dollar can serve everybody. If there are one hundred dollars in circulation, all individual's wealth will add up to more than 100 dollars.
The top money experts in human history such as Napoleon Hill advocate that there is an infinite supply of money. Who gave you the limitation idea?
@SadegoGG I never said it was limited you brainless idiot. I said as it becomes more plentiful it becomes of LESS VALUE, a Dollar during The Great Depression is worth much more than it is now. Stop responding to my comments because I know you're a troll already.
You denied the truth that there is an infinite supply of money. It might be hard for an individual full of limitation like you to understand...but inflation has absolutely nothing to do with the principle I am discussing...nor does it require any changes in the money supply.
Actually, it did spread quite a bit. The reason it isn't as wide spread as it could be, is simply because of the nature of our educational systems. And because of the nature of the product. It's kind of sad, really. All the people that call it bull$#!^, either didn't try it, or when they bought it, they either tried to rush through it, or were so intent on proving it wrong that it didn't work for them. Honestly, if you believe in it with an open mind, wanting to progress mentally, it will work.
I'd also like to point out this guy isn't around anymore, advertising at least, so I assume his system didn't work. Shouldn't base all these systems on this guy.
Speed reading does work, but it's not what people think. It's not about reading data as fast as you can once and ascertaining everything from it. It's a collection of techniques that can greatly decrease the time it takes you to get what you want from your reading. Check out Breakthrough Rapid Reading it's what I learned with and I can testify to it's validity. In fact I guarantee within your first sitting after doing the first drill you'll notice an increase in your speed alone.
If this would've worked, it would spread like cancer around the globe. I don't think Edison would need to promote his product, good product selss itself. Don't believe this crap!
is there any way of reaching Peter? or someone that already is able to photoread. i started photoreading course and im kinda lost. i would like to ask few question if someone can help me
hey cm on im serious. im talkin bout email. and telekinisis is to move things. not teleporting. except ofcoarse if you can make telekinisis on the planet
lol i've already read your other posts. No matter what you say you got no proof things as big as this have been properly documented and guess what nothing about photoreading but then i saw a video on derren brown called photoreading in one of his videos and didnt know what to think read tricks of the mind as someone previously stated and what does he say its complete rubbish
its not possible looks amazing though hey i will be very careful though of the scammers promoting this stuff they appear very genuine. Dont you think for a second if this were possible there would be lots of reliable truth but there isnt accept for those promoting it. Although there is a memory technique people use to memories say multiple decks of cards in order so on dominic o'brien.
this is dumb, The actual photo reading program requires you to go back to the book a day or so later in order to "fill in the gaps" meaning you just read normally part of the book that you "feel" you need to gather more info from based on the fast preread. On average, time spent with the book is the same or more than a normal fast reader. As for how he answers the questions? It's just a commercial, I wouldn't doubt he himself wrote the questions. (doesn't the other guys re"act"ion seem so real!)
why do I say that? Because when I came across this concept I was hoping it was real. Though, Nasa has released a study of it between a photo reader and a fast reader. Photo reading was proven to take the same amount of time or longer. Also, I say this guy is probably cheating (knowns the answer) because in the program at no point are you supposed to be able to retain and recall information on the first "glance through". So this guy in the movie isn't following the program that he is selling.
Ok. So because NASA says it isnt real that means it isnt? All the other things they have lied about why should this be true? Have you completed the whole mind system and not been able to use this technique? And would also appreciate a link or something to this study. Thanks!
well if you do some research you will see they did just that you ignorant programmed robot. They have done a lot worse then that,thats just the tip of the iceberg. And you didnt answer my question^^And I bet you are on of thoose idiots that watch tv and play meaningless videogames all day. Stick you head head in the sand and stay in denial. Go play some guitar or something. Prooving you own stupidity with a statement like dat.. And am I a looser for wanting the truth? Wastin my time MF
Look I'm not going to sit here and debate about the moon landing. Every questionable doubt has been proven to be null and void, even by much less educated researchers such as MythBusters. Name me please one other part of this conspiracy "iceberg". And no I have not participated in the program, but I was interested so I did some research on it. Which if you had bothered to do you would've recognized the plethora of articles and data against it's claims. ps. "Prooving you own stupidity" lol...
ok. 9/11. The war on terror. Vaccines. Aspartame. The educational system. The collapsing of the us dollar and euro. The patriot act. wars.Genocide and much more.. If you cannot see that things is wrong then god help you mate. And if we have not been on the moon what about the pictures,videos,mineral mining,bases ? And all the people working in the launching room and what about the millions and millions of dollars they spend every year?
I'm sorry dude, I'm just not going to believe you since your focal point is the moon landing. You can watch people go into these spacecraft and then watch them take off... it's not a magic trick or sleight of hand... Have you happened to watch the mythbusters episode on the moon landing? Probably will debunk your entire life...
youre right i tried this too lots of times and it doesnt work you cant force your mind do what its not able to do maybe there are other practices you can do to be able to do such a thing but i prefer to stay with my regular way of reading and i advice you to do so too cause its a scam i think
You honestly must be joking. It's no question that the brain processes EVERYthing the eye takes in. It performs actions through electricity. The connections it makes when you see one word or read the same word are the same, the only difference being that it's being processed auditorially as well. These neural connections are the same whether you're consciously aware of it or not.
If you're truly becoming a doctor, I'd never want you as my doctor, as you're way to closed-minded.
For one its not just through electricity its a little more complicated then that and another thing the study conducted and displayed on wikipedia is acutally credible. While everything might be processed via the brain the vast majority is not stored in our memory. Its so funny how you can believe such rubbish
The study on wikipedia is not credible. The study was conducted by the experimenter, who did not know the method. That in itself makes it not credible. Another thing, Learning Strategies was never even notified of this study, which was published using their name and method.
The conductee recorded a wpm of, if I remember correctly, just over 100 wpm? If he were using the method, this itself would be completely impossible.
Go to the forums to read more about it from the forum admin, Alex K.
Yes, I can actually photoread, I've been doing it for about a year and a half, and I'm very pleased with my results. Otherwise, why would I fight so hard to get across that it actually does work?
The wpm is not something that can be worked on. It was on a screen and so therefore, can go up to millions of words per minute depending on the amount of words on the screen.
No one can record all that was written perfectly, if you know anything about the system you know that's not what it's about. I can answer questions, though. After activation I can have a discussion about it as well.
lol you talk such rubbish. Are you some photoreading salesman. Even derren brown say all this stuff is just pure garbage comming from someone who knows a great deal about the brain and specifically memory
Actually, I just read what he said last night. No, he didn't say it was rubbish, he said you can take the course and get something out of it but it won't be what he's doing, as he integrates methods of his own.
I'm not a salesman at all, I'm a 15 year old kid, and I don't receive money from Learning Strategies (though now that I think about it, maybe I should :D).
I'm only trying to get people to do something that worked for me, and can work for them too. Honestly, I don't care what you think.
Lmao you lier i've read it and no derren brown makes it clear the technique is complete rubbish i ask anyone else to read tricks of the mind and i quote
"Everybody seemed happy with this process, and presumably with the idea of paying the £300 the trainer normally charged for this horseshit" Know its quite clear your just plain lieing probably trying to get ppl to waste their money on this rubbish
Wait, you actually just said that? Derren Brown is entertainment. TV is entertainment. What kind of argument is that?
Why are you still here if you're not even making an effort in finding out if this is actually real? You're convinced that it doesn't exist, so what's the point in asking anyway?
you dont have to pay anything, the system is simple, you have to use NLP techniques. if you think you cannot do this, then doesnt means this doesnt work for everybody. if you think so, well you must to have a little brain
oh my good!!!!!i was so happy when seeing this i actually started to laugh hehe. Just downloaded paul scheels photoreading course. cant wait to start. this is truly amazing
To accomplish this go through the photoreading whole mind system, and follow the manual activation techniques. After several days of doing it the technique will surface itself.
An entrepreneur had difficulty understanding the advice of his legal consultants. He went to a bookstore and PhotoRead several books on the subject. As he was leaving, a flash of insight streaked through his mind, drawing him back to the books. He returned to the shelf of books, intuitively grabbed one, and opened the book automatically to the page that offered a clear explanation of the advice.
If a computer can download or save a document in a split second, and if the mind is a much much much more advance machine then even today's super computers, then it must be logical that the mind can do extraordinary things. I would like to learn how to do this; imagine how it would change your life!
This ability is very possible but it takes practice. If you photoread lots and lots of books this ability will surface itself. I am currently working towards this ability
you can also speed view this video by pressing pause, then dragging the button quickly across the screen. oh, and I just read all your comments in 2 seconds
that's so not true. I don't think that our mind is that quick, it's just too much information!!! Com'on people. It's like: you have a whole life of hearing experience, do you think that u'll manage to UNDERSTAND a very fast dialog (like a recorded one and with a computer you make it fast)?
FAKE! Sales pitch!! FUCK YOU
ktof678 2 months ago
I'd like to see someone do this with a really emotional book, whether its a tragedy, horror, love or whatever just to see their reactions go by in a second
TheDilligan 5 months ago
SUCKER... I fuckin bought that self-study course, and WHAT THE FUCK HAPPENED? NOTHING. I tried to "PhotoRead" some books, What happened? Fuckin nothing. IT'S ALL SKIMMING. Basically, all of the system consists of pure skimming and nothing more.
Before Buying it, please check more information about it online, or, better still, Download it as a torrent, if it works, yohoo! go and buy it, If it does not, then don't waste your time and money!
AhmedOnMoment 6 months ago 2
Hey I can read the entire Bible in about 15 minutes by turning every page. Just... I don't have enough hard drive space or RAM in my brain to record the information. Too bad I read a 1800 page book and didn't remember it all at the same time. Oh well.
67xn 6 months ago
If you don't believe see this
watch?v=zvwEWIg4RS4&feature=related
stefy1995 6 months ago
@eabr89 It does... I’m learning photoreading and now after about 4 hours i can read up to 9.000 WPM
stefy1995 6 months ago
@stefy1995 9 words per minute? hmm..
hawaiihypnosis 1 month ago
Comment removed
stevo6280 7 months ago
This guy is an asshole, Nuff said
jscrewed 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i know this vid is old but i hope you answer this.. i heard that there are a 24 hour activate periode but in this video you answer direct ? paul
did you mind map in your head ?
this is no scam
luftisbollen 8 months ago
Comment removed
luftisbollen 8 months ago
Jonny 5 is Alive!!!
philipjterry 8 months ago
The Rainman, (may he rest in peace) could not even read that fast, and the majority of his brain was wired to do just that, from birth. So your telling me someone who does'nt have half the brain power of the Rainman could out do him. YEA RIGHT! Go on Oprah an prove it.
Otteto 9 months ago
@Otteto
Daniel Tammet can do things Rainman couldn't do.
SadegoGG 9 months ago
This guy was selling ties at my local Marshalls.
Greenvegan828 9 months ago 4
couldnt stop laughing at :55
priceless face
mathjone1 10 months ago
I would recommend checking the other more down-to-earth videos on PhotoReading. That's what I did before signing up for a Photoreading course and I've been benefiting from it... even though I am no where close to 693k wpm. I can post links in this comment but do a YouTube search for "Paul Scheele" and "Photo Reading". Hope this helps you :)
burgerpower 11 months ago
A claim like 693,000 wpm could be a scam. But as regular human beings, any improvement we can harness from Photoreading is definitely a plus. I've been through a 2 day Photoreading course & I can share that it's no scam. It does take a lot of practice 2 increase one's effective comprehension rate. I'd recommend not being distracted by a wild 693k claim as this (even if it's true...) & go check out a Photoreading course.
burgerpower 11 months ago
apparently he is seeing 462 words per eye frame and memorising it (every 0.04 of a second/4 milliseconds).
Glennoboyo 11 months ago
this is fantastic... if only if this were real.
entaroduai 1 year ago 12
693,000 words per minute soon internet will not be big enough for these people
ABBoynonamecrew 1 year ago
short circuit eat your heart out
philipjterry 1 year ago
@socratiz
The "10% of our brains" theory is a myth based on a misquote from Einstein.
Also, this is so obviously a scam. I could easily make a video like this. There is NO indication other than the reporter's word that suggests that this guy didn't already read the book. Those two answers could be done by any Charles Dicken's fan I'm sure.
ColdFusionGames 1 year ago
It's a scam. I saw a reporter do this and he "Photoread" the material once and couldn't remember anything. But they said he had to read it again just a bit slower. And then again a bit slower. And again a bit slower. By the end of the 5th reading he remembered bits and pieces.
Ian7570 1 year ago
i have tried this but no luck
yes i read fast but also have no idea what the book was talking about
wfw2001 1 year ago
If this was real, don't you think every student in America (and the world) would be taught this method of reading? Of course! That is your proof right there that this is a scam.
jgizzy 1 year ago
LMAO.... he answered two one word questions to justified his scam.
damthatriver09 1 year ago
fake, this is a scam. I tried it a couple months ago. IT DOESN"T WORK. It is a con!
DigitalR4pist 1 year ago
"OH YOU ANSWERED 2 QUESTIONS ABOUT A BOOK OMFG OMFG!"... Definitely an infomercial, definitely as much a scam as all the random weight-loss products. It wouldn't be that hard to memorize 2 questions. And was that even a book? It was only 10 paragraphs with double spacing...
JaccaKnoff 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
So his live testimonials of people saying they have seen him do this many times are also fake? Why don't you take it to court since it is illegal to make false testimonials?
SadegoGG 1 year ago
I dont believe that crap,thats magic !
izaak791 1 year ago
Now my biggest question is i have studied in institutions for talented kids because of my abilities in the subjects learned in school.
Now the acedemy that i attend is pretty small, and i know of no one at this acedemy that are reading at this speed. So why is this place not crowded. Which such an ability you could become an expert in most fields in no time at all.
that is if the brain actually takes a photo and all information is stored, which i highly doubt.
But why are we not all geniouses?
Dimajo 1 year ago
@Dimajo
Can you explain to me how the attainment of knowledge makes one an expert? In business, for instance, you have an entire group of people exposed to the same information yet 20% of them will make 80% of the sales.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
i got the book of this.
and im training myself how to photoread.
my brother who had tryd this for a week is starting to work for him!
at the start when i 1st heard about this , i was thinking .. what da f*k ? , this got to be a joke, how could you read 693,000 words per minute without realising?
ahahah . blehhhhh
eatmycookieface 1 year ago
Alright people, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to tell this is fake. These are two very, very basic questions about the book that Peter could have easily memorized prior to appearing in this infomercial.
Malicension 1 year ago
@Malicension First of all yes your abseloutly right the test shown here is structered in a horrible fashion. If this was to be proven he should NOT chose a popular book, and the test should be done with as many diffrent "rare" books as possible to test if then could answer a LIST of very precise questions. To fully test it you should have a range of how precise the information was.
Now do YOU provide any proof that its a scam, no. You don't show that the brain is not capable of doing this.
Dimajo 1 year ago
@Malicension So you saying that this is scam and untrue right off the bat, is the same thing they are doing but in reverse.
Now does this mean that its true just because you don´t have the knowledge to prove it, ofcourse not, then god would be true aswell just because we can't prove it wrong.
All i am saying is: your frist observation is great, but the second statement makes you the same as the people who promote this method. Study the brain and the claims then decide :)
Dimajo 1 year ago
@Dimajo
Why not actually put everything into the program with a Master Mind group and then decide if it doesn't work in 2 years or so?
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@SadegoGG I have no idea what that sentence is supposed to mean? please explain if you desire too. But i would see my method to be fair. But if you got something better please do explain friend.
Dimajo 1 year ago
@Dimajo
Well apparently you haven't studied anything in the basis of working as a team or actually achieving something on the magnitude of developing the faculties of your mind. It would take far too long for me to teach the entire Mastermind concept to you through youtube, especially with the character limitations.
Also, your point is not in any way valid since the brain is not what thinks. The mind thinks. The brain is an electronic switching station that creates emotions.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@Dimajo
Basically I gave you a strategy that is typically used by top executives/hopefully any employees to work with other people at specifically dated times to share goals, experiences, and as a way to stay committed to working at something everyday. Then to actually perform the training to determine whether or not it works rather than your limited belief system that is full of paradigms that object with this idea. You can't tell if something is possible until you change your paradigm.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@SadegoGG Ehmm once more all i heard was alot of nonsense that boiled down too: Have a number of people do this experiment so that we can collect more data from diffrent people.
So all your saying is: use more people.
i don't see why it is nessecary to be so rude, all i am saying is that your earlier sentence made no sense, and i would like to have an explanation. and thank you for giving me one. Still my example would be usuable. The only change you offer is more people.
Dimajo 1 year ago
@Dimajo
Nope, not at all. I was saying get a group of people together that meet regularly which indeed will give a larger sample size, but it will also improve each individuals chances of success significantly. Just working with one other people would make one 11 times as likely to succeed. And yes, my sentence made perfect sense...its your ignorance that is making you not understand it. Why don't you go pick up a good book on Master Minding before saying the things you say about it.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@SadegoGG I am sorry the sentence you made did not make any sense at all. That depends on ofcourse what criteria we set for what is acceptable or not. But enough about that.
We are not really interested in having this succeed by any means possible in the first test. In the first test they should be no evaluations because that is not in the program. First we need to test it following it point to point. And if that won´t work we need to use extended knowledge to try and make it work.
Dimajo 1 year ago
@Malicension
The problem is, people give him testimonials and they say they've seen him do this multiple times.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
lol, wat a load of crap
ShyamShiva 1 year ago
I've bought 2 books about photoreading,,,,,,,,,,, I've read both and tried really hard,,,,,,,,doesn't work at all,,,,,,and even it does,,,,it's pointless, u cant enjoy the book!
chihuahuabebi 1 year ago
ads,,,,,,,,fake,,,,
chihuahuabebi 1 year ago
Photoreading does work because i took the course and know how it works, i was taught by Mykal Pinder in london. If you have any questions i will answer them.
147ard 1 year ago
@147ard , I am a student. I regret all the time my super slow reading capasity, i will love to try this. is it spensive to try that?
yuoooo4 1 year ago
@yuoooo4, the home study course is about 200 pound, but i don't recommend it because there is lots of questions it doesn't answer. I was taught by a photoreading instructor in london and he was able to answer all my questions, the course was 375 pound and was taught over 2 days.
147ard 1 year ago
@147ard
Are you shure it's working? I wanna go to the course next week. I'm not so confident. Can you tell me more about it? Thank you.
mircea3006 7 hours ago
I'm a normal photoreader.. 1 page per second.. but i'm training to do like this guy!! xD that was like 10 pages per second or more !
madzane94 1 year ago
@madzane94 , Really, where did you learn? here in the US?
yuoooo4 1 year ago
@madzane94 so... this is actually possible? if i could read a page per second, i'd be more than satisfied! it's just that it seems so unrealistic...?
thrashizam 1 year ago
@madzane94 how do you do it? please help me im a 17 year old. and text books are what kids call these days"gay".
JmillMoreno 11 months ago
I dont believe this.
csayumi8 1 year ago
I do not believe this shit
he was prepared for questions
I wont believe it unless I meet him and give him a book of my choose, then ask him to start reading and then see what happen
azzam657 1 year ago
@azzam657
somehow I imagine that if you gave him a book of your choice, you would quickly come up with a new excuse not to believe it instead of looking into the subject and doing some research.
For example: you would simply say. "Damnit, I chose a book you must have already read".
HOW DO YOU EVER KNOW IF THE PERSON HAS ALREADY READ THE BOOK. You can always be pessimistic without being realistic.
socratiz 1 year ago
This is obviously a joke.
chrypton1 1 year ago
too good to believe...
hoshangkeswani 1 year ago
693,000 WPM
HelmerandRawlins 1 year ago 2
@hoshangkeswani I have been doing this for a while good stuff
AlexRaykin 10 months ago
guys this is a scam
ratzhushk 2 years ago
is this real???
PaulRietvoorn 2 years ago
i have tryed what they say
its a scam
ratzhushk 2 years ago
Comment removed
OfficialScience 1 year ago
Well...humans use only 10% of our brains.This might be 15-20% at work....
zoidbetag 2 years ago
Comment removed
OfficialScience 1 year ago
@zoidbetag Zoidberg, no. Just no. We don't "use only 10% of our brains", thats a horrible myth.
JaccaKnoff 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff Yeah, i did some reaserch, but AFTER I wrote the comment.
This is just another scam, making you spend time and money trying to learn nothing.
zoidbetag 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
Actually, its not. its about 15-20. And its the same story with DNA. only a limited amount is even active. And the rest they say is "junk". hahahha
socratiz 1 year ago
@socratiz
The "10% of our brains" theory is a myth based on a misquote from Einstein.
Also, this is so obviously a scam. I could easily make a video like this. There is NO indication other than the reporter's word that suggests that this guy didn't already read the book. Those two answers could be done by any Charles Dicken's fan I'm sure.
ColdFusionGames 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@socratiz
The "10% of our brains" theory is a myth based on a misquote from Einstein.
Also, this is so obviously a scam. I could easily make a video like this. There is NO indication other than the reporter's word that suggests that this guy didn't already read the book. Those two answers could be done by any Charles Dicken's fan I'm sure.
ColdFusionGames 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@socratiz
The "10% of our brains" theory is a myth based on a misquote from Einstein.
Also, this is so obviously a scam. I could easily make a video like this. There is NO indication other than the reporter's word that suggests that this guy didn't already read the book. Those two answers could be done by any Charles Dicken's fan I'm sure.
ColdFusionGames 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
U guys didnt do much 4 research. U looked up the 1st sceptic scientific journal and case closed cause it sounded smart.
The truth of the matter is that our brains work under the forces of electric and electro-magnetic energies. These energies can increase and decrease greatly. This is where we get into Kundalini. Or, as u would like 2 call them, subtle electrical + electromagnetic pulses.
We know thats what "brain activity" means. So, differnece between clarity + stress.
socratiz 1 year ago
LOL wow i wanna do that :D
madzane94 2 years ago
I don't quite understand the knee-jerk skepticism about photo reading.
If you're familiar with the extraordinary abilities of ' savants ' , you may recall people who can see a photo once, then proceed to draw, in total detail, the entire picture, be it of a cityscape, or whatever. Is that to be dismissed as impossible too, simply because we don't yet understand the process..?
The human mind is capable of extraordinary things, without too much tweaking. We only use a fraction of it.
tenminutesgone 2 years ago
< It's a matter of learning techniques & practise. Though I'm almost too lazy to scratch my ass, I'm damn sure I could grasp this procedure and increase my reading skills multiple times if I underwent relevant training. As could most everyone commenting on this video.
P.s. The guy doing the reading is not a scammer. He is closely involved with Learning Strategies ( a US company ) that uses NLP & other mind-tools for self-development. Google the name for more info if you remain unconvinced :)
tenminutesgone 2 years ago
Win Wenger ( Google him and check out his site), one of the world's experts on education, trained with Peter Bisonette, the reader in this video. He swears to me that he has seen this man do this many times with any book presented to him.
He also told me that going to the seminar gives abetter chance to learn it than on your own. I am going .. I have no connection with these people and remain open and skeptical. Will report back to you later.
volapuk49 2 years ago
@volapuk49 Did you go to the course?
mircea3006 7 hours ago
it's a joke?
miglioramento 2 years ago
Comment removed
OfficialScience 1 year ago
fake ... seems to me that photo reading is in fact scanning the book. In Teach yourself speed reading passive reading looks a lot like what that guy just did , but it is used to highlight the words that stand out , decide if the language is technical, and to make note of where are the key arguments.
they just make it look like you can read a book in 15 seconds
jbichotte 2 years ago
PhRing is literally a technique among the rest of techniques in the Whole Mind System. The concept of phring a book is no different then knowing by second nature where every one of your own possessions in your home is. you see a gorgeous girl once and you won't forget what she wore and her contours regardless that the first thing youd probably do is picture her naked. another big thing of phring is your intuition. when you do want something from your room you find is w/o looking at it directly
Latinomafioso85 2 years ago
this is a scam, i would like to see some independent scientific research which backs this up!!!!!
vanderpant2116 2 years ago 12
How about some scientific research that disproves it? Don't generate fallacies to make a point in future arguments, it makes you look stupid.
SadegoGG 2 years ago
i think a better starting point would be to prove that it actually works. Based on your theory i could say that i can fly and if no one is able to disprove this then it is the truth!!!
vanderpant2116 2 years ago 13
Actually it's the other way around. Despite the fact that thousands of individuals have developed this ability (Of course some of them think they have developed it, when they indeed have not but this is a rather advanced subject for someone of your intelligence.) Moving on, isn't it impressive MLB players know JUST When and how to release the ball to move at the speed, movement, accuracy they command the ball to move with? How's that more impressive than this?
SadegoGG 2 years ago
Furthermore, you're absolutely retarded if you don't know gravity completely disproves your claim, thus you can't fly. Also, what you said about the two ended proof system is a fallacy, like I discussed in my initial comment. How in any way did I say it surely existed because you can't disprove it?
How do figures such as Derren Brown manipulate people's minds to steal televisions, or freeze in place? Subliminal triggering can do amazing things, and photo reading can possibly exist, this guydidit
SadegoGG 2 years ago
@SadegoGG Use of the word "retard" in an otherwise, somewhat-intelligent argument makes you look dumb. Throwing a Ball and a Magician have nothing to do with your silly photo-reading system. Further more, you seem that you're unsure as to what you think in the matter because thousands of people out of 6 billion people have a mysterious "ability".
JaccaKnoff 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
How many people have actually applied the program and failed? Can you give me any documentation that this has even happened before saying a majority of students fail? Also, it is obvious that rich people develop multiple sources of income...yet the average individual only has one source of income. The masses in no way represent human potential, as most of them are too lazy to even achieve financial abundance. People are programmed to be lazy and to be ignorant through paradigms.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@SadegoGG Rich people.. you're kidding me right? People in power disregard people's lives for a profit, that's why terrible things like Bhopal and the BP oil spill happened. You're telling me that a "majority of the students fail"? Where do you get your data? Regardless of what you think, laziness has never applied to amount of income just like people failing to learn something does not apply to the thing they've learned actually working. 6 billion people cannot all be rich.
JaccaKnoff 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
What gave you the idea that 6 billion people can't all achieve financial abundance? Have you actually studied the attainment of wealth? There used to be entire cultures and/or countries with a small enough number of financially abundant individuals the one could count them all on their hands. In todays industrial societies, there are hundreds of thousands of millionaires.
Can you explain how if everyone provides more service than they are payed for not everyone can be 'rich'.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
Also, can you explain to me how Anthony Robbins disregards people's lives for profit? Just because there are a few people at the top who use their money for power doesn't mean all rich people, or even a majority of rich people, do also.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@SadegoGG First Anthony Robbins.. I googled that name and the first thing that came up was "SELFHELP" Which is a scam in itself. Also, if 6 billion people gained finacial abundance (Which a majority DO NOT have a chance) They would no longer be rich. Rich would be the new poor if you haven't connected the dots. See "Inflation". Also in the example you give the rich people are even hurting each other. (see Tony Robbins on Wikipedia under "Lawsuits"). Now stop spamming your nonsense on this page.
JaccaKnoff 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
How did you deduce self help is a scam? Are Anthony Robbin's testimonials from high corporate executives, professional athletes, and individuals who have achieved their goals all fake? Do you honestly believe you are performing at your peak when people like Bill Gates have billions of dollars? Are you also saying Bob Proctor's testimonials and the individuals who have talked with him discussing their results also fake and made up?
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
And who gave you the idea not 6 billion people can be rich? If people earn less money through service than they are providing others then spend that money on something of more value than they are paying, an infinite number of individuals can become rich. If you want to discuss this issue further, I recommend you actually study it first since this issue has absolutely nothing to do with inflation. Also, the first lawsuit is not applicable to the material Robbins teaches.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@SadegoGG You. You "gave me the idea". You specifically said "Who said 6 billion people can't reach financial abundance?" Abundance being "the property of a more than adequate quantity or supply" and rich being "Wealth is the abundance of valuable resources or material possessions or the control of such assets". Now I'm assuming you meant "can" and not "can't" in the first statement. Rich becomes poor as inflation happens, there is more money printed thus products get more expensive.
JaccaKnoff 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
Its unfortunate that you in no way understand money. First of all, you don't get money from the business you work for, it comes through the business. You get your money from an infinite supply. The quantity of money you earn is determined by the amount of service you render. And as one attains money, that money is either put in a bank or spent so someone else can now spend it. Inflation has absolutely nothing to do with this concept, since anyone can make as much $ as they want.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@SadegoGG You obviously have no understanding of money, based on Supply and Demand as you gain more supply to meet the demand it becomes worth less, 1 dollar now will NOT be worth the money it is currently in 10 years. Stop trollin' you should know this from Highschool, or even elementary. Regardless of how much money comes "through" the buisiness its just going to be worth less the more is printed since now a days you can't exchange it for gold (due to the 1930s and the government)
JaccaKnoff 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
Let me teach you the basics of this principle at a first grade level.
If you have one dollar and you trade it and who you trade it to trades it instantly and this goes on forever that one dollar can serve everybody. If there are one hundred dollars in circulation, all individual's wealth will add up to more than 100 dollars.
The top money experts in human history such as Napoleon Hill advocate that there is an infinite supply of money. Who gave you the limitation idea?
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@SadegoGG I never said it was limited you brainless idiot. I said as it becomes more plentiful it becomes of LESS VALUE, a Dollar during The Great Depression is worth much more than it is now. Stop responding to my comments because I know you're a troll already.
JaccaKnoff 1 year ago
@JaccaKnoff
You denied the truth that there is an infinite supply of money. It might be hard for an individual full of limitation like you to understand...but inflation has absolutely nothing to do with the principle I am discussing...nor does it require any changes in the money supply.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@vanderpant2116
great point...This system is a fraud... u took the words out of my mouth
SadegoGG is on the payroll so he is just going to say anything!! No Shame
OfficialScience 1 year ago
@OfficialScience
Can you find one affiliate link I have ever posted for this program or any other form of evidence backing up your claims?
SadegoGG 1 year ago
Comment removed
ScienceReporter 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SadegoGG
type this in google its a NASA finding PAGE 14
ntrs.nasa gov archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20000011599_2000009345
[PDF] file called
"View PDF File - .4...9 PRELIMINARY ANALYSIS OF PHOTOREADING By"
or this
20000011599_2000009345.pdf
ScienceReporter 1 year ago
@ScienceReporter
NASA is a government agency that studies space, sorry bro.
I couldn't find either of your second sources.
SadegoGG 1 year ago
@SadegoGG
You sound like Glen Beck
Patrickn210 2 years ago
actually it isn't fake. it is the photoreading system developed by paul scheele.
it does work but in our society it isn't used because a lot of people think it is impossible, and we wouldn't want to change the system
unimatrix192 2 years ago
This douche needs to team up with the micro-machines guy and become a millionaire.
musiclover1209 2 years ago 4
Actually, it did spread quite a bit. The reason it isn't as wide spread as it could be, is simply because of the nature of our educational systems. And because of the nature of the product. It's kind of sad, really. All the people that call it bull$#!^, either didn't try it, or when they bought it, they either tried to rush through it, or were so intent on proving it wrong that it didn't work for them. Honestly, if you believe in it with an open mind, wanting to progress mentally, it will work.
BrokenVai 2 years ago 2
Just did a look up on his company and it definitely seems like a scam.
HGeneAnthony 2 years ago
Comment removed
OfficialScience 2 years ago
I'd also like to point out this guy isn't around anymore, advertising at least, so I assume his system didn't work. Shouldn't base all these systems on this guy.
HGeneAnthony 2 years ago
Speed reading does work, but it's not what people think. It's not about reading data as fast as you can once and ascertaining everything from it. It's a collection of techniques that can greatly decrease the time it takes you to get what you want from your reading. Check out Breakthrough Rapid Reading it's what I learned with and I can testify to it's validity. In fact I guarantee within your first sitting after doing the first drill you'll notice an increase in your speed alone.
HGeneAnthony 2 years ago
If this would've worked, it would spread like cancer around the globe. I don't think Edison would need to promote his product, good product selss itself. Don't believe this crap!
vittumuista 2 years ago 2
is there any way of reaching Peter? or someone that already is able to photoread. i started photoreading course and im kinda lost. i would like to ask few question if someone can help me
metalbreathe 2 years ago
He lives off the grid and can only be reached by telekinesis.
HelmerandRawlins 2 years ago 3
hey cm on im serious. im talkin bout email. and telekinisis is to move things. not teleporting. except ofcoarse if you can make telekinisis on the planet
metalbreathe 2 years ago
call and ask if he's in. i did that once and i was able to ask him questions.
they're really nice people there.
ebpm4life 2 years ago
lol i've already read your other posts. No matter what you say you got no proof things as big as this have been properly documented and guess what nothing about photoreading but then i saw a video on derren brown called photoreading in one of his videos and didnt know what to think read tricks of the mind as someone previously stated and what does he say its complete rubbish
brucie4456 2 years ago
Comment removed
OfficialScience 2 years ago
can someone teach me how to do that ??
tayzkrunkwayz 3 years ago
its not possible looks amazing though hey i will be very careful though of the scammers promoting this stuff they appear very genuine. Dont you think for a second if this were possible there would be lots of reliable truth but there isnt accept for those promoting it. Although there is a memory technique people use to memories say multiple decks of cards in order so on dominic o'brien.
brucie4456 3 years ago
That's why they give you a 90 day (which could be extended as long as you want) money back guarantee?
It's very possible.
ebpm4life 2 years ago
Teach me too please!
CeCe950 2 years ago
Yes, the chinese guy from "karate kind"
alouminotavros 2 years ago
learningstrategies (dot1) com can teach you
akaCharlieG 2 years ago
their is more too it its very possible
FerretDude41 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I did photoreading. It is very real. What is not stated however is how photoreading is associated with the occult and released demons in my life.
spreadthegospel 3 years ago
This is officially fake go to wikipedia this has never been proven to work
johnshore22 3 years ago
Wikipedia has gotten a lot of things wrong.
Go to people who have done it, they're the only credible source.
Try it for yourself, get your money back if it doesn't work.
ebpm4life 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
absolutely fake, anyone who thinks otherwise is a complete idiot.
nigger didn't even maximize the window...
gauchebag 3 years ago
Window does not need to be maximized. Do you know anything about computers at all?
dietrichian 3 years ago 2
this has been used all over the world.
danndan6 3 years ago
this is dumb, The actual photo reading program requires you to go back to the book a day or so later in order to "fill in the gaps" meaning you just read normally part of the book that you "feel" you need to gather more info from based on the fast preread. On average, time spent with the book is the same or more than a normal fast reader. As for how he answers the questions? It's just a commercial, I wouldn't doubt he himself wrote the questions. (doesn't the other guys re"act"ion seem so real!)
guitarfreaktx 3 years ago
why do say that? soo not true
da9el1 3 years ago
why do I say that? Because when I came across this concept I was hoping it was real. Though, Nasa has released a study of it between a photo reader and a fast reader. Photo reading was proven to take the same amount of time or longer. Also, I say this guy is probably cheating (knowns the answer) because in the program at no point are you supposed to be able to retain and recall information on the first "glance through". So this guy in the movie isn't following the program that he is selling.
guitarfreaktx 3 years ago
Ok. So because NASA says it isnt real that means it isnt? All the other things they have lied about why should this be true? Have you completed the whole mind system and not been able to use this technique? And would also appreciate a link or something to this study. Thanks!
da9el1 3 years ago
haha, I bet you're one of those losers who thinks NASA faked the moon landing XD. No response necessary, you have lost all credibility as a human...
guitarfreaktx 3 years ago
well if you do some research you will see they did just that you ignorant programmed robot. They have done a lot worse then that,thats just the tip of the iceberg. And you didnt answer my question^^And I bet you are on of thoose idiots that watch tv and play meaningless videogames all day. Stick you head head in the sand and stay in denial. Go play some guitar or something. Prooving you own stupidity with a statement like dat.. And am I a looser for wanting the truth? Wastin my time MF
da9el1 3 years ago
Look I'm not going to sit here and debate about the moon landing. Every questionable doubt has been proven to be null and void, even by much less educated researchers such as MythBusters. Name me please one other part of this conspiracy "iceberg". And no I have not participated in the program, but I was interested so I did some research on it. Which if you had bothered to do you would've recognized the plethora of articles and data against it's claims. ps. "Prooving you own stupidity" lol...
guitarfreaktx 3 years ago
ok. 9/11. The war on terror. Vaccines. Aspartame. The educational system. The collapsing of the us dollar and euro. The patriot act. wars.Genocide and much more.. If you cannot see that things is wrong then god help you mate. And if we have not been on the moon what about the pictures,videos,mineral mining,bases ? And all the people working in the launching room and what about the millions and millions of dollars they spend every year?
da9el1 3 years ago
I'm sorry dude, I'm just not going to believe you since your focal point is the moon landing. You can watch people go into these spacecraft and then watch them take off... it's not a magic trick or sleight of hand... Have you happened to watch the mythbusters episode on the moon landing? Probably will debunk your entire life...
guitarfreaktx 3 years ago
Stay ignorant i dont bother.. its your freedom and health so care
da9el1 3 years ago
youre right i tried this too lots of times and it doesnt work you cant force your mind do what its not able to do maybe there are other practices you can do to be able to do such a thing but i prefer to stay with my regular way of reading and i advice you to do so too cause its a scam i think
kitonot 3 years ago
I can assure you it's not a scam.
The brain is capable of doing this, and it's not a matter of forcing it. It's a natural ability.
ebpm4life 3 years ago
stop talking rubbish i'm studying to become a doctor and i can tell you ppl the brain is not able to do this it is a scam.
johnshore22 3 years ago
You honestly must be joking. It's no question that the brain processes EVERYthing the eye takes in. It performs actions through electricity. The connections it makes when you see one word or read the same word are the same, the only difference being that it's being processed auditorially as well. These neural connections are the same whether you're consciously aware of it or not.
If you're truly becoming a doctor, I'd never want you as my doctor, as you're way to closed-minded.
ebpm4life 3 years ago
For one its not just through electricity its a little more complicated then that and another thing the study conducted and displayed on wikipedia is acutally credible. While everything might be processed via the brain the vast majority is not stored in our memory. Its so funny how you can believe such rubbish
johnshore22 3 years ago
The study on wikipedia is not credible. The study was conducted by the experimenter, who did not know the method. That in itself makes it not credible. Another thing, Learning Strategies was never even notified of this study, which was published using their name and method.
The conductee recorded a wpm of, if I remember correctly, just over 100 wpm? If he were using the method, this itself would be completely impossible.
Go to the forums to read more about it from the forum admin, Alex K.
ebpm4life 3 years ago
And if you're a doctor using wikipedia as a source, you really should reconsider what you're going to do with your life.
ebpm4life 3 years ago
let me ask you something can you actually photoread
johnshore22 3 years ago
Yes, I can actually photoread, I've been doing it for about a year and a half, and I'm very pleased with my results. Otherwise, why would I fight so hard to get across that it actually does work?
ebpm4life 3 years ago
so you can read 693,000 words per minute and be able to record all that was written perfectly
johnshore22 3 years ago
The wpm is not something that can be worked on. It was on a screen and so therefore, can go up to millions of words per minute depending on the amount of words on the screen.
No one can record all that was written perfectly, if you know anything about the system you know that's not what it's about. I can answer questions, though. After activation I can have a discussion about it as well.
ebpm4life 3 years ago
lol you talk such rubbish. Are you some photoreading salesman. Even derren brown say all this stuff is just pure garbage comming from someone who knows a great deal about the brain and specifically memory
johnshore22 3 years ago
Actually, I just read what he said last night. No, he didn't say it was rubbish, he said you can take the course and get something out of it but it won't be what he's doing, as he integrates methods of his own.
I'm not a salesman at all, I'm a 15 year old kid, and I don't receive money from Learning Strategies (though now that I think about it, maybe I should :D).
I'm only trying to get people to do something that worked for me, and can work for them too. Honestly, I don't care what you think.
ebpm4life 3 years ago 3
Lmao you lier i've read it and no derren brown makes it clear the technique is complete rubbish i ask anyone else to read tricks of the mind and i quote
"Everybody seemed happy with this process, and presumably with the idea of paying the £300 the trainer normally charged for this horseshit" Know its quite clear your just plain lieing probably trying to get ppl to waste their money on this rubbish
johnshore22 3 years ago
"Derren Brown makes it clear that..."
Wait, you actually just said that? Derren Brown is entertainment. TV is entertainment. What kind of argument is that?
Why are you still here if you're not even making an effort in finding out if this is actually real? You're convinced that it doesn't exist, so what's the point in asking anyway?
Demoras 3 years ago
you dont have to pay anything, the system is simple, you have to use NLP techniques. if you think you cannot do this, then doesnt means this doesnt work for everybody. if you think so, well you must to have a little brain
carlosms83 3 years ago
oh my good!!!!!i was so happy when seeing this i actually started to laugh hehe. Just downloaded paul scheels photoreading course. cant wait to start. this is truly amazing
da9el1 3 years ago
i know about 2 people that have that abbility
ur born with it.
CRAKIZGOOD 3 years ago
To accomplish this go through the photoreading whole mind system, and follow the manual activation techniques. After several days of doing it the technique will surface itself.
FerretDude41 3 years ago
An entrepreneur had difficulty understanding the advice of his legal consultants. He went to a bookstore and PhotoRead several books on the subject. As he was leaving, a flash of insight streaked through his mind, drawing him back to the books. He returned to the shelf of books, intuitively grabbed one, and opened the book automatically to the page that offered a clear explanation of the advice.
HelmerandRawlins 3 years ago
oh my god
comemon 3 years ago
If a computer can download or save a document in a split second, and if the mind is a much much much more advance machine then even today's super computers, then it must be logical that the mind can do extraordinary things. I would like to learn how to do this; imagine how it would change your life!
ImOnTheTube 3 years ago
This ability is very possible but it takes practice. If you photoread lots and lots of books this ability will surface itself. I am currently working towards this ability
FerretDude41 3 years ago
you can also speed view this video by pressing pause, then dragging the button quickly across the screen. oh, and I just read all your comments in 2 seconds
flmbstn 3 years ago 4
Hahah very nice comment.
HelmerandRawlins 3 years ago
you can register for a f-r-e-e introductory seminar on photoreading at:
learnphotoreading(dot)com
the seminar is conducted in singapore. you can go check it out for yourself and see if it works for you! :D
uymg2007 3 years ago
that's so not true. I don't think that our mind is that quick, it's just too much information!!! Com'on people. It's like: you have a whole life of hearing experience, do you think that u'll manage to UNDERSTAND a very fast dialog (like a recorded one and with a computer you make it fast)?
gsscalet 3 years ago