The only reason one should perform an "adjustment" is if stiffness is present. You shouldn't adjust a scoliosis for example (unless you want to increase the instability of already lengthened ligaments) or to "cure" any type of disease to "improve nerve flow energy" as chiropractors have done for years, and the only ones who do not are not practicing the way that the profession has since it's inception in the early 20th century in America.
@Frisbinator There are many reasons why a person needs an adjustment and stiffness is not the only symptom. there are many condition that can be treated by upper cervical chiropractic, blood pressure, otitis media, ADD and ADHD, Autism, are all using chiropractic as a treatment method and having amazing results.
Your opinion is wrong about scoliosis. You need to check out what the Clear Institute is doing for the treatment of scoliosis.
@brazilianspiritzz No, these are one before care and one after care x-ray and the computer fills in how the vertebra may have moved that results in the after x-ray. Many times the x-rays are taken within minutes of the other. So of these are days or weeks later.
It doesn't matter the upper cervical specific technique as long as the alignment component of the subluxation is correted or reduced. Most of these were from the Orthospinology procedure but some were from other upper cervical procedures.
Blair is a good procedure! It is based on the "articular model" of determining upper cervical alignment. Orthospinology, Grostic, Atlas Orthogonal and Advanced Orthogonal are based on the "Orthogonal Model" of determing upper cervical alignment. Most of the changes seen in this video are changes that occured following the use of the Orthospinology procedure and other "Orthogonal Model" procedures.
I'll admit, I drooled a bit watching your video. I'd like to trade places with one of them. Though, I agree with the Orthogonal method a bit more simply based on reason. I found an AO practitioner who charges an arm and a leg BUT she claims that most of her patients are healed after the second session which I find a bit hard to believe. The Blair practitioner quoted "around 6 months or longer." Which would you choose as I'm having a difficult time deciding.
The only reason one should perform an "adjustment" is if stiffness is present. You shouldn't adjust a scoliosis for example (unless you want to increase the instability of already lengthened ligaments) or to "cure" any type of disease to "improve nerve flow energy" as chiropractors have done for years, and the only ones who do not are not practicing the way that the profession has since it's inception in the early 20th century in America.
Frisbinator 1 year ago
Comment removed
jamesgrammer 1 year ago
@Frisbinator There are many reasons why a person needs an adjustment and stiffness is not the only symptom. there are many condition that can be treated by upper cervical chiropractic, blood pressure, otitis media, ADD and ADHD, Autism, are all using chiropractic as a treatment method and having amazing results.
Your opinion is wrong about scoliosis. You need to check out what the Clear Institute is doing for the treatment of scoliosis.
jamesgrammer 1 year ago
is this continous collection of x-rays?
brazilianspiritzz 1 year ago
@brazilianspiritzz No, these are one before care and one after care x-ray and the computer fills in how the vertebra may have moved that results in the after x-ray. Many times the x-rays are taken within minutes of the other. So of these are days or weeks later.
drbo33 1 year ago
@drbo33, please check your personal message I sent in your youtube account and let me know what you think. Thanks.
brazilianspiritzz 1 year ago
is it really truth ?
Chebotar 2 years ago
How long does it take for the neck to get that well?
bluliite 2 years ago
Amazing! Atlas Orthogonal is not practised in New Zealand...can Toggle Recoil adjustments achieve the same results and changes in the cervical spine?
mandykathryntong 3 years ago
It doesn't matter the upper cervical specific technique as long as the alignment component of the subluxation is correted or reduced. Most of these were from the Orthospinology procedure but some were from other upper cervical procedures.
drbo33 3 years ago
What do you think of Blair upper cervical technique. I like Atlas orthogonal but there aren't too many AO practitioners surprisingly in SoCal.
cmmnsense 2 years ago
Blair is a good procedure! It is based on the "articular model" of determining upper cervical alignment. Orthospinology, Grostic, Atlas Orthogonal and Advanced Orthogonal are based on the "Orthogonal Model" of determing upper cervical alignment. Most of the changes seen in this video are changes that occured following the use of the Orthospinology procedure and other "Orthogonal Model" procedures.
drbo33 2 years ago
I'll admit, I drooled a bit watching your video. I'd like to trade places with one of them. Though, I agree with the Orthogonal method a bit more simply based on reason. I found an AO practitioner who charges an arm and a leg BUT she claims that most of her patients are healed after the second session which I find a bit hard to believe. The Blair practitioner quoted "around 6 months or longer." Which would you choose as I'm having a difficult time deciding.
cmmnsense 2 years ago
Great video! Could you please refer me to other upper cervical videos/websites/articles?
Future UC DC
oamolina 3 years ago