This is exaclty how building 7 collapsed??? So you heard loud explosions and flashes set in time like this??? Only you and other fucking idiot truthers seem to see and hear that no one else does. And if you think that implosion using explosives is the only way a building can collpase then you need to look up verinage demo it is proof that the top of a building can collpase the remaining bottom without explosives.
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monekys are smarter than Truthers
@MrJeggus no there were no controlled demo explosions. People heard loud noises and in the confusion associated what they heard to something they understand like 'explosions" There were many items that may have "exploded" or caused loud noises (electrical panels, fuel tanks, columns breaking etc) that sounded like "explosions" There were no demo explosions you moron. And "explosions" is a failed argument (continued)
@MrJeggus yeah that is the typical bullshit response I knew I would get from a typical bullshit lying idiot of a truther. I clearly explained how you fail to explain and prove your bullshit using facts so you have to resort to crying out your bullshit opinion. I could give a shit what you think is "suspect" I was waiting for you to provide one proven fact. Seems like you cannot and I have put you in your place. You sad pathetic loser.
@12weasel100 BTW, I did watch the video on your channel. I am amused that somehow you have come to the conclusion in your feeble idiotic mind that the building in the video somehow resembles WTC 7. You really are a clown. Grow up youngster. Also being from Canada this is absolutely none of your business!
@MrJeggus fuck off you deluded sack of shit helping to prevent the spread of ignorant bullshit is everyone's business. And as per a typical truther you fail to watch all videos and put basic concepts together. Verinage demo is to prove that the top portion of a building can cause the collapse of the bottom portion without using explosives. Had you watched other videos you would also have seen that fire can and has caused other steel framed structures to collapse. Shit you are a moron.
@MrJeggus Well first I am sure you do not respond to idiot Canadian Truthers that support your bullshit with the same response. I am sure you are happy they believe your bullshit. And second as I continue to write preventing the spread of ignorance and bullshit is everyone's responsiblity. It is everyone's responsibility to prevent idiots like you from trying to dumb down the world with your bullshit lies and ignorance. Run along and kiss your own ass you retard.
@12weasel100 Don't you worry your stupid ass off because the people who pulled off 911 and those who let it happen were counting on the stupid morons like you to believe their lies! SO YOU ARE SERVING A PURPOSE! Keep up the propaganda!
@MrJeggus thanks for the bullshit response that was based on your bullshit opinion. We are all still waiting to hear you provide even one single proven fact that clearly proves controlled demo. Seems like you are not able to do so which makes you nothing more then an angry little ranting crying idiot. boo hoo baby you keep crying.
@12weasel100 Sorry, I gave up trying to hold an intelligent conversation with crazy ans stupid people a long time ago! BTW, This is still none of your business you moronic Canuck!
@MrJeggus you cannot have an intelligent conversation you are too fucking stupid for that and have no supporting facts. And preventing the spread of ignorance is everyone's business.
@12weasel100 Yeah, Like i said, all buildings fall like that. As the total moron you are I am surprised that you must have mastered basic physics. Because for the first time in history many basic laws of physics were proven wrong! Good for you and your team of total idiots!
@MrJeggus (continued) "explosions" is a failed argument because the "explosions" heard were by people in the towers or near the base. Explosions would indicate the initiation of the collapse. Truthers claim 9.2 sec (really approx 17 sec) to collapse. Using longer time of 17 secs you are suggesting the people heard explosions (the start of the collapse) then in under 17 secs made it down several floors and far enough away (several yards) from the towers (continued)
@MrJeggus (continued) so you are basically suggesting the people ran faster than Olyimpic and World Record Sprinters (including firefighters with all their gear on) or you are suggesting the "explosions" started the collapse the building magically stood long enough in suspended air for the people to get out and away then somehow knew that the people were out and collapsed. Because in this video the explosions occur and the building comes down within seconds of them. You fail you retard.
This is complete bullshit!! This building falls NOTHING like the WTC. The WTC is total and complete chaos. If you bother to notice how this building falls, it falls cleanly to its footprint because lower columns are being taken out. The falling mass is not encountering resistance. Notice how most of the building is all falling together.
Not at the WTC. All the lower floors are intact until the upper portion lands on it. A great deal of resistance is happening shoving material out blocks
One time, I was playing Jenga, and the tower fell when I dropped pieces of metal on it from around twice the tower's height. The only logical reason I could think of was that the USA planted explosives at the bottom because it didn't fall the moment the metal hit! It took so long, and during this time the tower moved and settled and swayed. There's no universal force on Earth that brings all matter relatively downward at 9.8 m/s^2. When I contacted the government, they ignored me. Coincidence?
the only difference is with the wtc, if you look at the video, they just reversed the first big boom, instead on the bottom it was on top, they needed the fog of pulverized cement to mask, the obvious demo job, they created their own cover by blowing top first, its just a big curtain to hide what was really going on
@kixxclub Or, but here's a crazy idea, the cement actually did cause a fog when it fell, because that's what it always does. And the top really did fall because debris hit..the top. Nah, that doesn't make sense, nvm.
@Redstick27 there are 2 types of ways of brining down highrise buildings 1 is from the bottom as you just sore (like wts 7) but taller buildings are brought down from the top down, these are noticable from the outward ejection of debri like seen in wtc 1 and 2. Also there are video's showing the same flash's from the 3 buildings that fell on 9/11 but ofc the flash's are more spread out not to be so noticable, research demolition and look for the flash video's my freind :)
@galaxything no you always have to bring them down from the bottom 1st. no matter how big or small the building is. you need to target the foundation and its support columns.
@pat442389 no m8 there are demolitions called "top down" i dont know the technicle name but i know in the demolition industry they call it a top down, you may even find videos of some on here m8
1) charges used to bring down large building are extremely powerful, displace a lot of air, are very loud, and can be heard from miles away. no explosions were heard like this were heard on 911
2) as you notice, controlled demolitions work bottom-up; they start at the the 1st floor or basement and then the building collapses on its-self while explosives break it up along the way. WTC was top-bottom; it collapsed on its-self, breaking up as it fell
@cofoidh you can control the noise of demolition charges. experts have said they can control which way the building falls, where DEBRIS falls, how loud it is, how far you can hear it, the shock wave patters, and vibrations from it. Take a look: /watch?v=-cwO8loSeaA . How does a plane that was nearly at its destination (so it had to be low on fuel) turn ALL THE WAY AROUND (probably empty by now) and still have enough fuel to destroy the only steel framed buildings to ever fall due to fire? Think.
@Redstick27 no the flashes were going off all over the building in more subtle was, they could not make it that obvious, duh, remember it was not supposd to look like a demo job, duh
What happened happened, the same lives were lost no matter if they died from a controlled demolition, a plane filled with overreligious nutters, or if a ufo / *paste a random retarded conspiracy theory here* did it.
What are these people trying to prove?
They obviously doesn't care about the lives of those who died in 9/11, but are using the disaster to prove their own avis that their government is evil.
Dear stupid " dinmammatre" when you try to find out the truth about how a person died , in your retarded mind it means that you don't care about that person?
for ex : if you are trying to catch the killer of your friend , it means that you don't care for him?
"dinmammatre " the conclusion from your comment was that people should stop asking who murdered the victims of 911, and all they must do is to accept they are dead. So fuck off.
911 was an inside job . fuck bush , fuck obama and fuck the nwo
We know for sure that it was terrorists hiding in Afghanistan. What are you trying to prove? And if it was, how do you know that? You don't, but you think you do.
@result321 Yeah, everyone except you got BRAINWASHED. He can't possibly know anything, cause he's just a kid! da oldrr smartz of u guyzs maeks me hav a hole so lot muhc of da respeckt 4 u. u gotz to b smarzer cuz errybudy noes dat smarterest peepz be old3r an inkreese smartnos.
This is supposed to prove that the destruction of the WTC was a controlled demolition? I'd say it proves 100% that it wasn't, there were no explosions anything like that when the WTC came down. LOL
This guy is an enemy of free speech, do not block anyone who uses YouTube, let people express their views and if you disagree, then submit a rational argument to support your views instead of attempting to censor them.
Trying to deny the facts, are we? By the time the 2:nd tower was hit by a plane, there were news cameras all around, and also lots of people. Someone would have heard all these explosions.
So which is it, thermite or explosives? You can't have it both ways I'm afraid. There were no explosions anything like what is seen in this video. Also note that, in this video the whole building collapses all at the same time, whereas the world trade centre towers collapsed starting from the top and working down, which is consistent with the official explanation.
The explosions heard at lower levels were most likely caused by the energy transferred when the steel supports failed.
from all accounts ive researched.. explosions were at different times to planes hitting and collapse..
To tell you the truth.. Im over this whole topic.. its Obvious whats happened.. and theres no convincing people who believe the media.. these people really have to realize for themselves.. youve obviously got your hands in some pie.
I was using poor grammar because I was typing in a hurry. I meant to say that thermate doesn't detonate, so it won't leave a plume of debris shooting out in the manner that high explosives will. You could cut the support beams of a skyscraper with thermate and only blow the top, allowing it to crash down through the building easily. This seems likely in buildings 1 and 2. Building 7 however seems as if more conventional explosives were used throughout the structure.
Have you ever actually spoken with any skeptics? Obviously, people who think that al-Qaeda was responsible don't think people are incapable of that sort of thing. The reason we don't think they were controlled collapses is that they «weren't» controlled collapses. Look at this video. The building fell straight down, into its own footprint. Watch the WTC collapse. It fell out, destroying everything nearby.
I have spoken with skeptics that refuse to acknowledge the free fall speed collapse, the molten pools of steel, the thermate residue, the fact that it did NOT destroy everything nearby, only a small area around the footprint, the fact that Norad stood down for 2 hours, the fact that Bush and Cheney refuse to answer public questions, the fact that at least 7 high jackers are still alive, the fact that Larry silverstien leased all three bulidings..and hundreds more things skeptics ignore. sorry
A person cannot convince another to realize Truth.
Convincing implies that one person is attempting to sway the opinion of another without necessarily providing factual information; on the other hand, Realization can only come from within and through personal experience with facts.
Many people have realized that 9-11 was an inside job... but there are those still convinced otherwise.
And those "many people" are typically younger, poorly educated, and in a lower social class; without much to work for, and easily convinced of something that could possibly prove their government wrong.
WTC buildings 1,2, and 7 all collapsed at freefall speed, symmetrically. Only explosives can account for the instantaneous failure of all the floors below the points of impact on buildings 1 and 2 (which were undamaged), and the otherwise inexplicable implosion of building 7.
Towers 1 and 2 collapsed *faster* than at freefall. Furthermore, far from disproving the NIST account of the collapse, it's IMPLIED by the official report.
People crying "freefall! it's a conspiracy!" aren't considering the mechanics of collapse, nor the structure of the towers. The towers had steel columns around the outside. When the upper, falling, floors landed on the top of a column the column transferred the force far down the building practically instantly.
Obviously they couldn't START the demolition at the bottom of the WTC. Besides it's not even HALF the hight!
All they needed were planes to make holes and just enough stuff to get the building moving, and the top uses gravity to cause most of the demolition. Besides, the eyewitnesses who were there, almost unanimously attested to high explosive sounds prior to "collapse". Just because the few videos were are allowed to see don't have "giant booms" means nothing
WTC1&2 collapsed at the point of impact an hour after the planes hit. i suppose you can tell us the manufacturer of explosives than can survive a 767 crash only to be triggered an hour later? they don't exist. any explosives planted on those floors would have detonated on impact of the planes.
Go to New York and talk to some of the guys who were there when the buildings came down. If you think global elites, who built those Masonic symbols to begin with, could not manage to use them "Create a catastrophe, offer a solution" you are fooling yourself. They don't use old fashioned anything to produce these events. Rummy announced 2.3 trillion that "could not be tracked" from the Pentagon on 9/10/2001. Certainly that could pay for a very well engineered event.
You fucks better wake up or you will be fried in the middle of these streets! Ray guns fema camps the amero. Area 51 feed our children to other being inside the planet. All you fucking punks deserve to die if you think people who can't even get a descent drink of water came over here with no help took a plane a flew it and knocked down one of the heaviest building in the world!!!! Die and die slowly cowards.
Type in ray gun in search engine. Then type in Alex collier and look at all of them and you tell me if I'm serious or not. You probably too busy watching guy people dance and sing on evening television to notice these things.
No they do not. They show compressed air escaping. Try claping your hands and you will see what I mean. You truthers have nothing. For example, thermite is about the worst type of demolitions possiable to use.
So you have proof of that? Were the "security systems" planted directly onto the supporting structure of the building behind the walls? because thats where the explosives would have to be. And how do you explain how every other controled demoltion required the buildings to be hollowed out? Just some guy saying it is this way is not proof. You still have nothing.
an explsive does not have to be behind a wall. and what about building 7? you just want to beleive the U.S is good and wholesome you'll find out when your family is being taken into femas camps. You'd better wake b4 its too late. Type in ray gunn and NAU while its not to late.
down elevator shafts, severed power cables, high voltage generators attempting to kick in automatically igniting fumes in the elevator shaft, maybe some explosives, Thermate detonations and planted Thermate drums, Definitely military grade Thermate which is why the area was like hot lava for 3 Months or more.
Actually it only happened twice. The CIA Building only caught on fire, there was nothing wrong with the structure and they admittedly announced they had to blow it up. All pre-planned, definitely a cover-up destroying the CIA building destroyed private files that would have been evidence probably for other crimes as well
wtc 7 contained offices of the IRS, Secret Service, and SEC and I stand corrected, I remember silverstein stating to give the go ahead to pull and somehow thought it was made public that the building was in such bad condition that they had to bring it down.
You are fighting with someone who agrees with you. You know wtc7 was blown up, Silverstein said it had to be pulled so the major planting of devices had to done as you say weeks in advance.
Also go into my account, click on the website link in my profile, go into conspiracy, it is not as orginized as I would like, it will take a year or so to get it perfect but I was amazed at what I found out. You will learn a lot there.
In addition, Eventually I will go back through everything, re-analyze and make sure that my perception of the information is correct. This site has helped a lot like when you get someone who is media brianwashed leading them to your website makes it easy for them to learn.
You somehow mis-understand, I am a truth seeker. It seems obvious that Thermate detonations were used in wtc's They are quiet but create similar to molton lava. I did not know wtc7 pull was not made public I already told you that I stand corrected.
i really hope the truth will come out some day! can i add u so we can talk about all this and send videos with evidence!! i would do all i can in my life to get the truth out to everyone!!
occasional explosions were heard at WTC but not in series. Plumes of white smoke in WTC might have been windows blowing out from the collapse above forcing cement dust through elevator doors to floors below.
Ummm, did anyone notice the gaping hole at the side of WTC 7 facing the Twin towers? It got raped, horribly raped by the debris from the Twin Towers. Let's see any other building survive such an onslaught of tons and tons of concrete and steel collapse on it. lol
Similar, except for the multiple explosions before it fell. Similar, except for the giant explosion at the bottom. Similar except for all the side explosions before it began to collapse.
This isn't similar. This is nothing like how the towers fell. Get a life, there is no conspiracy.
Wow, being that some people here are on the 'inside', knowing this vast conspiracy- you would think that the force of 100,000+ persons involved with pulling off the phony 9/11 attacks would of tracked these geniuses down already before they had a chance to awaken we, the ignorant public, to the 'truth'.
Considering that little building would fit inside the elevator corridors in WTC 1 or 2, imagine how obvious any kind of controlled demolitions would be for a building exponentially larger. Three of them no less. This makes it more obvious then anything how impossible a CD would be, not that anyone with an iota of common sense wouldn't know it already.
LOL! Yeah, and lizards rule the world! Wait you believe that too don't you (Reptilian)! "Truthers" are the biggest morons on the planet. Some of them know history like CIA coups, how the US lied to get into Vietnam, and how there are errors with the 9/11 commission report but must are idiots. This is nothing like WTC 7. There we no loud noises or bright lights. Most "truther" claims turn out to be lies like Flight 93 landing in Ohio or Cheney issuing a stand down order.
thurmanthomas1990 is an idiot... looks exactly like the wtc. shows how a building collapsing on itself cant be an accident... im guessing he is actually mentally handicaped...
kingstevesmith: Steve Smith is no King. Smith is common. Why don't you take your tongue out of George Bush's ass. Or rather you whole head. Clearly you are a Republican. You could see him shoot someone in person and are the type that would say it's a trick. Loser!
What this video very clearly shows is that a controlled demolition is NOTHING LIKE the WTC collapse. There were no multiple loud bangs immediately prior to the WTC collapse for one thing.
there actually was, if you listen to the people who were ACTUALLY there, they heard multiple explosions prior to the collapse, and sequential ones as the building was just about to come down.
Show me one controlled demolition of a building that collapses from top to bottom...you can't because they all collapse at the bottom like this one. WTC 1 and 2 started collapsing at the TOP!!!
youtube : "top down demolition", and you will know the technic used for the WTC 1&2 demolitions. Time to wake-up, the tower have been brought down, that's just a fact of physics.
I noticed they didn't have to have a missile hit it in the shape of a jet on two floors, a big ball of flames, then burning from the top floors to cause collapse. Is this some type of conspiracy controlled demolition your showing us. Wherz Charlie Sheen and Rosie?
Did you hear the sounds that were made all right after another...show me a video where you hear all those explosions one right after another...you can't. OOn top of that, for 110 story building, that's 110 x 4 = at least 440 explosions per building. Listen to this video and get a clue you dumbass.
Thats exactly what the firemen described, a series of explosions boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! You don't think that sound you heard on this video was recorded on that chopper do you?
It was recorded at street level and had the volume turned up real loud on here.
This is exaclty how building 7 collapsed??? So you heard loud explosions and flashes set in time like this??? Only you and other fucking idiot truthers seem to see and hear that no one else does. And if you think that implosion using explosives is the only way a building can collpase then you need to look up verinage demo it is proof that the top of a building can collpase the remaining bottom without explosives.
Truthers are fucking idiots. Retarded monekys are smarter than Truthers
12weasel100 6 months ago
@12weasel100 Yes there were explosions stupid! Do the research. You might be amazed!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus no there were no controlled demo explosions. People heard loud noises and in the confusion associated what they heard to something they understand like 'explosions" There were many items that may have "exploded" or caused loud noises (electrical panels, fuel tanks, columns breaking etc) that sounded like "explosions" There were no demo explosions you moron. And "explosions" is a failed argument (continued)
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 Yeah, all buildings fall like that! And three in one day is not suspect at all! WO@W, keep drinking that koolaid!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus yeah that is the typical bullshit response I knew I would get from a typical bullshit lying idiot of a truther. I clearly explained how you fail to explain and prove your bullshit using facts so you have to resort to crying out your bullshit opinion. I could give a shit what you think is "suspect" I was waiting for you to provide one proven fact. Seems like you cannot and I have put you in your place. You sad pathetic loser.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 BTW, I did watch the video on your channel. I am amused that somehow you have come to the conclusion in your feeble idiotic mind that the building in the video somehow resembles WTC 7. You really are a clown. Grow up youngster. Also being from Canada this is absolutely none of your business!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus fuck off you deluded sack of shit helping to prevent the spread of ignorant bullshit is everyone's business. And as per a typical truther you fail to watch all videos and put basic concepts together. Verinage demo is to prove that the top portion of a building can cause the collapse of the bottom portion without using explosives. Had you watched other videos you would also have seen that fire can and has caused other steel framed structures to collapse. Shit you are a moron.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 Like I said you stupid Canuck its none of your business!STFU!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus Like I said preventing the spread of bullshit lies and ignorance is everyone's business. You stupid asshole
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 And like I said. Its not your business you stupid Canuck! Don't you have a queens ass you need to kiss?
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus Well first I am sure you do not respond to idiot Canadian Truthers that support your bullshit with the same response. I am sure you are happy they believe your bullshit. And second as I continue to write preventing the spread of ignorance and bullshit is everyone's responsiblity. It is everyone's responsibility to prevent idiots like you from trying to dumb down the world with your bullshit lies and ignorance. Run along and kiss your own ass you retard.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 NUNYA!!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus Preventing the spread of ignorance and bullshit- everyone's business.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 NUNYA Business stupid!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus Preventing the spread of ignorance and bullshit- everyone's business. You stupid pile of pig shit.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 NUNYA you stupid Canuck!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus Preventing the spread of ignorance and bullshit- everyone's business. You stupid pile of pig shit.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 YOU REALLY ARE ONE IGNORANT MOTHERFUCKING CANUCK! GO KISS THE QUEENS ASS WILL YOU?
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus And you are a lying asshole that spreads ignorance like a fucking cancer. Go suck another dick you faggot
12weasel100 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@12weasel100 FISH ON! You must be the stupidest person on the planet!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@12weasel100 Don't you worry your stupid ass off because the people who pulled off 911 and those who let it happen were counting on the stupid morons like you to believe their lies! SO YOU ARE SERVING A PURPOSE! Keep up the propaganda!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus thanks for the bullshit response that was based on your bullshit opinion. We are all still waiting to hear you provide even one single proven fact that clearly proves controlled demo. Seems like you are not able to do so which makes you nothing more then an angry little ranting crying idiot. boo hoo baby you keep crying.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 you truly are a useful idiot!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus you truly are a stupid pathetic asshole. We are all still waiting to hear your facts asshole.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 The facts are out there. Just not on your page. You are a useful idiot aren't you. Go kiss the Queens ass for me will you?
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus you have no facts if you did you would be able to list them. All you have is a pile of bullshit lies. Go suck another dick.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 Sorry, I gave up trying to hold an intelligent conversation with crazy ans stupid people a long time ago! BTW, This is still none of your business you moronic Canuck!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@MrJeggus you cannot have an intelligent conversation you are too fucking stupid for that and have no supporting facts. And preventing the spread of ignorance is everyone's business.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@12weasel100 As a useful idiot you are sure entertaining! Fish On!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrJeggus and you are an uneducated piece of dog shit you stupid asshole.
12weasel100 5 months ago
@MrJeggus I like you WEASEL because you make me laugh!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
@12weasel100 Yeah, Like i said, all buildings fall like that. As the total moron you are I am surprised that you must have mastered basic physics. Because for the first time in history many basic laws of physics were proven wrong! Good for you and your team of total idiots!
MrJeggus 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@MrJeggus (continued) "explosions" is a failed argument because the "explosions" heard were by people in the towers or near the base. Explosions would indicate the initiation of the collapse. Truthers claim 9.2 sec (really approx 17 sec) to collapse. Using longer time of 17 secs you are suggesting the people heard explosions (the start of the collapse) then in under 17 secs made it down several floors and far enough away (several yards) from the towers (continued)
12weasel100 5 months ago
@MrJeggus (continued) so you are basically suggesting the people ran faster than Olyimpic and World Record Sprinters (including firefighters with all their gear on) or you are suggesting the "explosions" started the collapse the building magically stood long enough in suspended air for the people to get out and away then somehow knew that the people were out and collapsed. Because in this video the explosions occur and the building comes down within seconds of them. You fail you retard.
12weasel100 5 months ago
Comment removed
12weasel100 6 months ago
This is complete bullshit!! This building falls NOTHING like the WTC. The WTC is total and complete chaos. If you bother to notice how this building falls, it falls cleanly to its footprint because lower columns are being taken out. The falling mass is not encountering resistance. Notice how most of the building is all falling together.
Not at the WTC. All the lower floors are intact until the upper portion lands on it. A great deal of resistance is happening shoving material out blocks
roquefortfiles 8 months ago 2
WATCH THE ARIVALS
parts 43-45
pinball281 8 months ago
@ 0.12 you start seeing light flashes going upward, those are exact identical to the ones seen in the WTC!!!
batt4u 8 months ago
One time, I was playing Jenga, and the tower fell when I dropped pieces of metal on it from around twice the tower's height. The only logical reason I could think of was that the USA planted explosives at the bottom because it didn't fall the moment the metal hit! It took so long, and during this time the tower moved and settled and swayed. There's no universal force on Earth that brings all matter relatively downward at 9.8 m/s^2. When I contacted the government, they ignored me. Coincidence?
MrOntopofit123 9 months ago
911 revisited.
koolbossjock 11 months ago
Comment removed
MrOntopofit123 9 months ago
Hmm, I've seen this before...
Grunwald55 1 year ago
the only difference is with the wtc, if you look at the video, they just reversed the first big boom, instead on the bottom it was on top, they needed the fog of pulverized cement to mask, the obvious demo job, they created their own cover by blowing top first, its just a big curtain to hide what was really going on
kixxclub 1 year ago
@kixxclub Or, but here's a crazy idea, the cement actually did cause a fog when it fell, because that's what it always does. And the top really did fall because debris hit..the top. Nah, that doesn't make sense, nvm.
MrOntopofit123 9 months ago
@Redstick27 there are 2 types of ways of brining down highrise buildings 1 is from the bottom as you just sore (like wts 7) but taller buildings are brought down from the top down, these are noticable from the outward ejection of debri like seen in wtc 1 and 2. Also there are video's showing the same flash's from the 3 buildings that fell on 9/11 but ofc the flash's are more spread out not to be so noticable, research demolition and look for the flash video's my freind :)
galaxything 1 year ago
@galaxything no you always have to bring them down from the bottom 1st. no matter how big or small the building is. you need to target the foundation and its support columns.
pat442389 1 year ago
@pat442389 no m8 there are demolitions called "top down" i dont know the technicle name but i know in the demolition industry they call it a top down, you may even find videos of some on here m8
galaxything 1 year ago
This proves it was'nt a controlled demolition.
1) charges used to bring down large building are extremely powerful, displace a lot of air, are very loud, and can be heard from miles away. no explosions were heard like this were heard on 911
2) as you notice, controlled demolitions work bottom-up; they start at the the 1st floor or basement and then the building collapses on its-self while explosives break it up along the way. WTC was top-bottom; it collapsed on its-self, breaking up as it fell
cofoidh 1 year ago
@cofoidh you can control the noise of demolition charges. experts have said they can control which way the building falls, where DEBRIS falls, how loud it is, how far you can hear it, the shock wave patters, and vibrations from it. Take a look: /watch?v=-cwO8loSeaA . How does a plane that was nearly at its destination (so it had to be low on fuel) turn ALL THE WAY AROUND (probably empty by now) and still have enough fuel to destroy the only steel framed buildings to ever fall due to fire? Think.
DoesntEveryoneDoIt 1 year ago
Comment removed
cofoidh 1 year ago
LOL, this video actually proves the WTC toofers wrong.
Notice FIRST explosions, flashes, THEN collapse from the bottom.
The toofers tell you the explosions were going off after the collapse began FROM WHERE THE PLANE HIT.
hahaha, toofers , no logic needed to be part of that group.
Redstick27 1 year ago
@Redstick27 no the flashes were going off all over the building in more subtle was, they could not make it that obvious, duh, remember it was not supposd to look like a demo job, duh
kixxclub 1 year ago
no planes?
no taliban?
no osama?
no terror?
no larry silverstein?
no fire from copy paper and carpets?
no BS stories?
no "war on whatever"?
sh.t, what went wrong?
result321 2 years ago
yes, i agress with this video.
and recommend the film september clues by simon shack, to fill in some of the gaps.
ttimothymurphy 2 years ago
What happened happened, the same lives were lost no matter if they died from a controlled demolition, a plane filled with overreligious nutters, or if a ufo / *paste a random retarded conspiracy theory here* did it.
What are these people trying to prove?
They obviously doesn't care about the lives of those who died in 9/11, but are using the disaster to prove their own avis that their government is evil.
dinmammatre 2 years ago
Dear stupid " dinmammatre" when you try to find out the truth about how a person died , in your retarded mind it means that you don't care about that person?
for ex : if you are trying to catch the killer of your friend , it means that you don't care for him?
FUCK YOU!
ag01web 2 years ago
I find it amusing and rather ironic that you call others retarded and stupid while youself have obviously nothing to say.
I said I did care about the person, ( This would be a good place to put the word Retard. )
and that's why people who doesn't care about the person but rather care about their own theory should die.
You might want to read the comment before posting, hyper-intelligent person.
dinmammatre 2 years ago
"dinmammatre " the conclusion from your comment was that people should stop asking who murdered the victims of 911, and all they must do is to accept they are dead. So fuck off.
911 was an inside job . fuck bush , fuck obama and fuck the nwo
ag01web 2 years ago
We know for sure that it was terrorists hiding in Afghanistan. What are you trying to prove? And if it was, how do you know that? You don't, but you think you do.
dinmammatre 2 years ago
You know BS, kid!
You are completely BRAINWASHED.
Get lost. :-(
We are fed up with the PROPAGANDA of zionist Messmedia!
result321 2 years ago
@result321 Yeah, everyone except you got BRAINWASHED. He can't possibly know anything, cause he's just a kid! da oldrr smartz of u guyzs maeks me hav a hole so lot muhc of da respeckt 4 u. u gotz to b smarzer cuz errybudy noes dat smarterest peepz be old3r an inkreese smartnos.
MrOntopofit123 9 months ago
Shut up, kid.
Brainwashed as....es of your age need proper EDUCATION.
Go and play the rest of your little brain off with "knights of honour".
result321 2 years ago
You're embarrassing yourself.
If you're indeed 59 years old, that is.
Otherwise you're probably 12, which seems more likely, looking the way you argue.
dinmammatre 2 years ago
Kid, go playing with your computer games.
And dont disturb grown up men.
result321 2 years ago
Grown up men like you? XD You amuse me.
dinmammatre 2 years ago
What an idiot xD
aSASa45454 2 years ago
@ dinmaamatre
Stupid kid!
Get lost you retarted TJIDF-troll! :-(
Zionist Silverstein made a fortune by having the Mossad blowing the buildings.
Go and see a doctor.
Or continue playing your CHILDISH knights of honor , kid.
result321 2 years ago
This is supposed to prove that the destruction of the WTC was a controlled demolition? I'd say it proves 100% that it wasn't, there were no explosions anything like that when the WTC came down. LOL
mrgav88 3 years ago
This guy is a disinfo troll block him.
Great post by the way.
ozobezleeb 3 years ago
This guy is an enemy of free speech, do not block anyone who uses YouTube, let people express their views and if you disagree, then submit a rational argument to support your views instead of attempting to censor them.
mrgav88 3 years ago
Trying to deny the facts, are we? By the time the 2:nd tower was hit by a plane, there were news cameras all around, and also lots of people. Someone would have heard all these explosions.
dinmammatre 3 years ago
Yes, that is my point.
mrgav88 3 years ago
there were loads of accounts of explosions on lower levels... also Thermite doesnt explode.. it quietly burns the fuck out of anything
tOOballs 3 years ago
So which is it, thermite or explosives? You can't have it both ways I'm afraid. There were no explosions anything like what is seen in this video. Also note that, in this video the whole building collapses all at the same time, whereas the world trade centre towers collapsed starting from the top and working down, which is consistent with the official explanation.
The explosions heard at lower levels were most likely caused by the energy transferred when the steel supports failed.
mrgav88 3 years ago
why cant i have it both ways?
why couldnt both have been used? hmm?
from all accounts ive researched.. explosions were at different times to planes hitting and collapse..
To tell you the truth.. Im over this whole topic.. its Obvious whats happened.. and theres no convincing people who believe the media.. these people really have to realize for themselves.. youve obviously got your hands in some pie.
peace
tOOballs 3 years ago
Strange man.
mrgav88 3 years ago
What makes this even more entertaining is that you are actually serious. 29 years old, and 7 years later. Man, do yourself a favor and grow up.
philritter21 2 years ago
what ever ok
tOOballs 2 years ago
Thermate doesn't explode in the same manner.
undeadpresident 2 years ago
Thermate doesn't explode. Thermate burns.
dinmammatre 2 years ago
Exactly.
undeadpresident 2 years ago
So why do you say it *exolodes* in the same manner, and what manner would that be?
dinmammatre 2 years ago
I was using poor grammar because I was typing in a hurry. I meant to say that thermate doesn't detonate, so it won't leave a plume of debris shooting out in the manner that high explosives will. You could cut the support beams of a skyscraper with thermate and only blow the top, allowing it to crash down through the building easily. This seems likely in buildings 1 and 2. Building 7 however seems as if more conventional explosives were used throughout the structure.
undeadpresident 2 years ago
Yes, that sounds reasonable.
dinmammatre 2 years ago
Possibly because all of those things are either false or irrelevant.
If you haven't seen it already, I strongly recommend "Screw Loose Change".
nevermore1000 3 years ago
A key issue why skeptics say 9-11 can't be an inside job is because it's believed that man doesn't have the ability to be that evil.
People would accept the evidence (Truth) of 9-11 much easier if they realized man's potential of evil.
The same skeptics that call any dissent traitorous are the same people that refuse to read the other side's arguments.
I wouldn't be surprised if they were reincarnations of those who refused to acknowledge the world as round way back when.
History does repeat.
TheRealVerbz 3 years ago
Have you ever actually spoken with any skeptics? Obviously, people who think that al-Qaeda was responsible don't think people are incapable of that sort of thing. The reason we don't think they were controlled collapses is that they «weren't» controlled collapses. Look at this video. The building fell straight down, into its own footprint. Watch the WTC collapse. It fell out, destroying everything nearby.
nevermore1000 3 years ago
I have spoken with skeptics that refuse to acknowledge the free fall speed collapse, the molten pools of steel, the thermate residue, the fact that it did NOT destroy everything nearby, only a small area around the footprint, the fact that Norad stood down for 2 hours, the fact that Bush and Cheney refuse to answer public questions, the fact that at least 7 high jackers are still alive, the fact that Larry silverstien leased all three bulidings..and hundreds more things skeptics ignore. sorry
TheRealVerbz 3 years ago
So because some skeptics you've spoken to can't account for the things you think matter, ALL skeptics must be wrong?
WrongZak 3 years ago
I think that all skeptics that utilize arguments with no scientific backing must be wrong.
If other skeptics have the same mentality regarding the above list, then yes, they are incorrect.
TheRealVerbz 3 years ago
A person cannot convince another to realize Truth.
Convincing implies that one person is attempting to sway the opinion of another without necessarily providing factual information; on the other hand, Realization can only come from within and through personal experience with facts.
Many people have realized that 9-11 was an inside job... but there are those still convinced otherwise.
TheRealVerbz 3 years ago
And those "many people" are typically younger, poorly educated, and in a lower social class; without much to work for, and easily convinced of something that could possibly prove their government wrong.
philritter21 2 years ago
That about sums you up then, judging by your comment.
dinmammatre 2 years ago
WTC buildings 1,2, and 7 all collapsed at freefall speed, symmetrically. Only explosives can account for the instantaneous failure of all the floors below the points of impact on buildings 1 and 2 (which were undamaged), and the otherwise inexplicable implosion of building 7.
undeadpresident 3 years ago
Towers 1 and 2 collapsed *faster* than at freefall. Furthermore, far from disproving the NIST account of the collapse, it's IMPLIED by the official report.
People crying "freefall! it's a conspiracy!" aren't considering the mechanics of collapse, nor the structure of the towers. The towers had steel columns around the outside. When the upper, falling, floors landed on the top of a column the column transferred the force far down the building practically instantly.
WrongZak 3 years ago
Highrises don't collapse symmetrically, at freefall speed, without explosives.
undeadpresident 3 years ago
"similar to WTC"?
Bullshit.
Obviously they couldn't START the demolition at the bottom of the WTC. Besides it's not even HALF the hight!
All they needed were planes to make holes and just enough stuff to get the building moving, and the top uses gravity to cause most of the demolition. Besides, the eyewitnesses who were there, almost unanimously attested to high explosive sounds prior to "collapse". Just because the few videos were are allowed to see don't have "giant booms" means nothing
DarthKazi 3 years ago
WTC1&2 collapsed at the point of impact an hour after the planes hit. i suppose you can tell us the manufacturer of explosives than can survive a 767 crash only to be triggered an hour later? they don't exist. any explosives planted on those floors would have detonated on impact of the planes.
fastfingersfunk 3 years ago
Go to New York and talk to some of the guys who were there when the buildings came down. If you think global elites, who built those Masonic symbols to begin with, could not manage to use them "Create a catastrophe, offer a solution" you are fooling yourself. They don't use old fashioned anything to produce these events. Rummy announced 2.3 trillion that "could not be tracked" from the Pentagon on 9/10/2001. Certainly that could pay for a very well engineered event.
DarthKazi 3 years ago
Wow, doesn't that dust look familiar.
Meckanix 3 years ago 3
You fucks better wake up or you will be fried in the middle of these streets! Ray guns fema camps the amero. Area 51 feed our children to other being inside the planet. All you fucking punks deserve to die if you think people who can't even get a descent drink of water came over here with no help took a plane a flew it and knocked down one of the heaviest building in the world!!!! Die and die slowly cowards.
scizahands 3 years ago
Okay I am not sure if you are serious here or just being sarcastic. If you are serious, you missed a medication some where.
sonofdy 3 years ago 2
Type in ray gun in search engine. Then type in Alex collier and look at all of them and you tell me if I'm serious or not. You probably too busy watching guy people dance and sing on evening television to notice these things.
scizahands 3 years ago
Thermate would not burn for 3 months dumbass. In fact in usualy burns out in less than a minute. Have you actualy ever seen it used?
sonofdy 4 years ago 2
looked nothing like the WTC collapse, most notably the flashes and bangs weren't present in the collapse of the WTC. I'm sorry but this is pathetic.
fungasuta 4 years ago
I'm rather amazed to see someone say "...flashes and bangs weren't present in the collapse of the WTC..."
Even the "pretend truther" video "Loose Change" clearly shows explosive squibs.
????
nameofthepen 4 years ago
No they do not. They show compressed air escaping. Try claping your hands and you will see what I mean. You truthers have nothing. For example, thermite is about the worst type of demolitions possiable to use.
sonofdy 4 years ago
so tell me what happened on 9/11?
Charlietheleet 3 years ago
4 planes were hijacked and used in suicide attacks.
sonofdy 3 years ago
yeah man those terrorist new we were running drills the same day! off course.
Charlietheleet 3 years ago 2
One has nothing to do with the other. God you truthers love to invent concetions.
sonofdy 3 years ago
sonofdy, why don't you believe the truth? is it hard to think your government doesn't love you?
Charlietheleet 3 years ago
The U.S. government demolished the world trade center and blamed it on al-queida.
bigtaterman 3 years ago
They certainly were
Kryptozoic 4 years ago
wow looks just like something that happened on 9/11...
manurulz5 4 years ago
Yeah except the WTC "bombs" didn't make that kind of sound for some reason...
CHF2 3 years ago
This video proves 9/11 was not an inside job. Note the explosions are from the bottom up then compare to the wtc falling.
sonofdy 4 years ago
I must be blind? I clearly see simultaneous flashes around the middle of the building at the beginning...
And WTC witnesses reported explosions in the basement...
nameofthepen 4 years ago
The "witness" you refer to has been well documented in changing his story. BTW where are the eye witnesses to planting these explosives?
sonofdy 4 years ago 2
The explosives were in the ne security systems that they installed do your home work.
scizahands 3 years ago
So you have proof of that? Were the "security systems" planted directly onto the supporting structure of the building behind the walls? because thats where the explosives would have to be. And how do you explain how every other controled demoltion required the buildings to be hollowed out? Just some guy saying it is this way is not proof. You still have nothing.
sonofdy 3 years ago
an explsive does not have to be behind a wall. and what about building 7? you just want to beleive the U.S is good and wholesome you'll find out when your family is being taken into femas camps. You'd better wake b4 its too late. Type in ray gunn and NAU while its not to late.
scizahands 3 years ago
That just shows you know nothing about explosives.
sonofdy 3 years ago
Part 2
explosions could have been from fuel pouring
down elevator shafts, severed power cables, high voltage generators attempting to kick in automatically igniting fumes in the elevator shaft, maybe some explosives, Thermate detonations and planted Thermate drums, Definitely military grade Thermate which is why the area was like hot lava for 3 Months or more.
WorldAwareness 4 years ago
No steel framed structures have NEVER collapsed due to fire!!! but that happend 3 times that day!!!!
charlivoo 4 years ago
Actually it only happened twice. The CIA Building only caught on fire, there was nothing wrong with the structure and they admittedly announced they had to blow it up. All pre-planned, definitely a cover-up destroying the CIA building destroyed private files that would have been evidence probably for other crimes as well
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
no there has been atleast three wtc1 wtc2 and wtc7
charlivoo 4 years ago
wtc 7 contained offices of the IRS, Secret Service, and SEC and I stand corrected, I remember silverstein stating to give the go ahead to pull and somehow thought it was made public that the building was in such bad condition that they had to bring it down.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
so they put in demolition in 6 hours wich normally take months to plan!! or what is it ur saying!!
charlivoo 4 years ago
Right here, Silverstein makes the statement to a camera
put this in the search
WTC 7 - Pull It By Larry Silverstein
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
lol u are so stupid!!! no one in the world could never plant so much explosive in 6 hours!! and why would they need to "pull" it down!!?!?!?
charlivoo 4 years ago
so they planned in under 6 hours a demolition that was perfect!!! with no mistakes!!!!
what normally takes weeks of planning!!!
u are truely dumb!!!
charlivoo 4 years ago
You are fighting with someone who agrees with you. You know wtc7 was blown up, Silverstein said it had to be pulled so the major planting of devices had to done as you say weeks in advance.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
no man im ur freind thats why i wanna add u
charlivoo 4 years ago
Also go into my account, click on the website link in my profile, go into conspiracy, it is not as orginized as I would like, it will take a year or so to get it perfect but I was amazed at what I found out. You will learn a lot there.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
In addition, Eventually I will go back through everything, re-analyze and make sure that my perception of the information is correct. This site has helped a lot like when you get someone who is media brianwashed leading them to your website makes it easy for them to learn.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
who said it had to be "in under 6 hours"? There were many "powerdowns" and ordered moves of the tenants in the weeks leading up to the event.
nameofthepen 4 years ago
then search this if u wanna play that game!!
world trade center building 5 why no collapse
charlivoo 4 years ago
You somehow mis-understand, I am a truth seeker. It seems obvious that Thermate detonations were used in wtc's They are quiet but create similar to molton lava. I did not know wtc7 pull was not made public I already told you that I stand corrected.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
stand correct lol!!! no one stands correct about the wtc7 collapse!!!!
charlivoo 4 years ago
There is a language barrier- When I say I stand corrected that means I was wrong and you are right.
FreeGlobalEnergy 4 years ago
Okay sorry i dont understand english so well!
i really hope the truth will come out some day! can i add u so we can talk about all this and send videos with evidence!! i would do all i can in my life to get the truth out to everyone!!
charlivoo 4 years ago
Part 1
occasional explosions were heard at WTC but not in series. Plumes of white smoke in WTC might have been windows blowing out from the collapse above forcing cement dust through elevator doors to floors below.
WorldAwareness 4 years ago
Ummm, did anyone notice the gaping hole at the side of WTC 7 facing the Twin towers? It got raped, horribly raped by the debris from the Twin Towers. Let's see any other building survive such an onslaught of tons and tons of concrete and steel collapse on it. lol
TripleZ89 4 years ago
This looks nothing like the wtc 7 collapses. I mean ANY BUILDING falling looks similar but there were no multi bangs or anything like that at all!
jaykia 4 years ago
Similar, except for the multiple explosions before it fell. Similar, except for the giant explosion at the bottom. Similar except for all the side explosions before it began to collapse.
This isn't similar. This is nothing like how the towers fell. Get a life, there is no conspiracy.
SSky06 4 years ago
This demolition crew wasn't concerned with hiding the explosives or the flashes, you doofus!
crazy650c 4 years ago 2
And this Demolition crew exists, unlike the one you're talking about, doofus.
SSky06 4 years ago
ssky06 U are BIG TIME BRAINWASHED!
sorry but no one can help u here with ur problem!!
charlivoo 4 years ago
It's good to know people can trust their eyes to realize this looks nothing like the WTC collapses.
ArmchairRevolution 4 years ago
Wow, being that some people here are on the 'inside', knowing this vast conspiracy- you would think that the force of 100,000+ persons involved with pulling off the phony 9/11 attacks would of tracked these geniuses down already before they had a chance to awaken we, the ignorant public, to the 'truth'.
handjob10 4 years ago
Considering that little building would fit inside the elevator corridors in WTC 1 or 2, imagine how obvious any kind of controlled demolitions would be for a building exponentially larger. Three of them no less. This makes it more obvious then anything how impossible a CD would be, not that anyone with an iota of common sense wouldn't know it already.
handjob10 4 years ago
This looks nothing like the WTC. In all of the videos of WTC 1 2 and 7 there is no loud bang or bright fire works which are in this video.
overmind25 4 years ago
Your fucking stupid. 911 was controlled demo'ed and our government did it. Wake fuck up you stupid brainwashed moron of a bastard.
zZReptilianZz 4 years ago
LOL! Yeah, and lizards rule the world! Wait you believe that too don't you (Reptilian)! "Truthers" are the biggest morons on the planet. Some of them know history like CIA coups, how the US lied to get into Vietnam, and how there are errors with the 9/11 commission report but must are idiots. This is nothing like WTC 7. There we no loud noises or bright lights. Most "truther" claims turn out to be lies like Flight 93 landing in Ohio or Cheney issuing a stand down order.
overmind25 4 years ago
Btw, WTC 7 didn't collapse at free fall speed.
overmind25 4 years ago
You're a moron Reptillian. Get a brain. This looks ABSOLUTELY NOTHING LIKE the WTC COLLAPSES.
SSky06 4 years ago
This doesn't look like WTC 1 or 2, they were explosions not implosions. It does look similar to WTC 7.
louie100 4 years ago
This collapse looks nothing like the WTC collapse. In fact, this video proves to me even more that the WTC collapse was NOT a controlled explosion.
thurmanthomas1990 4 years ago
Shutup, Go look at the wtc explosions again...Your full of shit, And you know it.
SevenFiveSevenCrazy 4 years ago
You're just a idiot, it looks nothing like the WTC collapses.
SSky06 4 years ago
thurmanthomas1990 is an idiot... looks exactly like the wtc. shows how a building collapsing on itself cant be an accident... im guessing he is actually mentally handicaped...
mordred655321 4 years ago
thurmanthomas are u like mentally handicapped? explain to me the differnce in looks, pls.
bodmondude 4 years ago
kingstevesmith: Steve Smith is no King. Smith is common. Why don't you take your tongue out of George Bush's ass. Or rather you whole head. Clearly you are a Republican. You could see him shoot someone in person and are the type that would say it's a trick. Loser!
greenplaidshirt 4 years ago
144 i agree when you collapse a building its from the bottom not the top.
ebrolady113 4 years ago 2
What this video very clearly shows is that a controlled demolition is NOTHING LIKE the WTC collapse. There were no multiple loud bangs immediately prior to the WTC collapse for one thing.
Crusader148 4 years ago
there actually was, if you listen to the people who were ACTUALLY there, they heard multiple explosions prior to the collapse, and sequential ones as the building was just about to come down.
bodmondude 4 years ago
Just look at the videos on my site for all the explanations you're looking for.
dfwtexxaas 4 years ago
Show me one controlled demolition of a building that collapses from top to bottom...you can't because they all collapse at the bottom like this one. WTC 1 and 2 started collapsing at the TOP!!!
kingstevesmith 4 years ago
youtube : "top down demolition", and you will know the technic used for the WTC 1&2 demolitions. Time to wake-up, the tower have been brought down, that's just a fact of physics.
onegus 4 years ago
I noticed they didn't have to have a missile hit it in the shape of a jet on two floors, a big ball of flames, then burning from the top floors to cause collapse. Is this some type of conspiracy controlled demolition your showing us. Wherz Charlie Sheen and Rosie?
mykol13v 4 years ago
In this case they weren't trying to make it look like an accident...In the case of WTC they were.
saw3deer 4 years ago
You noticed that it started collapsing at the bottom instead of the top. I hope all you conspiracy theorists eat your words now.
dfwtexxaas 4 years ago
there are implosions like this one and WTC7, and there are explosions like the WTC. It's conspiracy reality.
werebear1 4 years ago 2
Did you hear the sounds that were made all right after another...show me a video where you hear all those explosions one right after another...you can't. OOn top of that, for 110 story building, that's 110 x 4 = at least 440 explosions per building. Listen to this video and get a clue you dumbass.
dfwtexxaas 4 years ago
Thats exactly what the firemen described, a series of explosions boom! boom! boom! boom! boom! You don't think that sound you heard on this video was recorded on that chopper do you?
It was recorded at street level and had the volume turned up real loud on here.
saw3deer 4 years ago