Added: 2 years ago
From: garydumbill
Views: 29,590
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (321)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Why on earth would people vote for the party that got us into the current economic downturn? Help keep our government unified and strong this election. Throwing a wrench into the gears is NOT a good fix. Be patient and support our government.

  • @194db? "why on earth would people vote for the party that got us into the current economic downturn??" because they didn't .they may not have done enough to ensure we where in a better position to deal with a downturn, but neither would the Tories given the exact same circumstances and lets not forget who turned us into a service industry, as we all know SI `s are fragile and feel the smallest ripples of any down turn .to hell with your govement .

  • @194db NEVER vote labour. I am 19 and that lesson will stay with me for the rest of my life.

  • surprised that ain't got more views

  • what is this song?

  • Gordon Brown, texture like sun :D awesome reference! love it :D

  • Oh, wow! The Old Politics. The pre-2010 Britain! Is it true that at one point, people didn't actually Believe in Nick Clegg!?

  • Oh, wow! The Old Politics. The pre-2010 Britain! Is it true that at one point, people didn't actually Believe in Nick Clegg!?

  • They should make a porno of the General Election and call it the General Erection!! Mate mwahahahha, just had to check that I had sweaty boxers and I didn't just PMSL!! ;)

  • Excellent video! Very funny.

  • Bloody fantastic! You might like my humorous view on the outcome of the election on my YouTube site.

  • I agreed with nick but

    /watch?v=MqlTJ8OLE9A

  • Anyone serious about UK Politics SHOULD come to my channel and check out my latest video!

  • Yeh Gordon!! Form a government man.

  • massive tune

  • Comment removed

  • Like it - good one on eatsleepsportcom

  • @boombip25 ;___;

  • Brown is right--Cameron is a slimy puppet of Goldman Sachs and the big companies, as he virtually says!

  • Johnathan Leftwinger MP's special message:

    "VOTE LABOUR and at least redeem something of your tattered and twisted reputations Public! DON'T give us a hung Parliament - you'll only force us to cling to power in alliance with the Lib Dems! (And we want power all on our own as it should be!)"

    Click my username for: NEW LABOUR'S TOTALITARIAN ANTI-CHRIST DRUG DEALERS DESERVE AT LEAST POLL DEATH!

  • At the "Blur" "Oasis" bit, I was like, "Yeah, I knew I preferred Labour."

  • @ChemicalWorldGreen haha. although i'd put cameron as more of a blur fan

  • Who are you not voting for? Check my profile out to make the final decision :)

  • Discuss these points..

    -Cameron will take away the Cancer Guarantee

    -He will cut the economy when it has only grown by 0.2% (with gov input)???

    -Cameron will cut Education

    -Cameron will cut the Police

    ????WHY VOTE TORY AT THIS ELECTION WHEN SOMEONE WITH EXPERIENCE AND SUBSTANCE IS NEEDED?????

    VOTE LABOUR

    VOTE GORDON BROWN

  • @NewLabour1 I agree that the Conservatives are a bad choice but so is Labour. Have u seen the Political Compass website. The Greens and Respect are easily the best positioned parties on the right/left paradigm.

  • @NewLabour1 Did you notice the huge recession? Personally if you are in a huge amount of debt what do you do to get out of it? Get more loans out to pay off you existing ones? Or cut your spending?

  • @NewLabour1 Gordon Brown and his gang gave us the largest debt, political correctness, record voting fraud, sell-out to the EU without permission (despite the Lisbon promise), too much immigration, billions for Third World dictatorships and nations with space programmes, Parliamentary sleaze worse than the Tories with plotting to seize the balance of power with the Lib Dems, plus much besides.

    Britain's had enough. We're not bigots for wanting change.

  • Nick Clegg is no "who" any more

  • @DearAaron Nope, he now holds the future of the country in his hands. the man who said 'no backroom deals', has now become a horse trader, desperate for power!

  • 2:29 Hunk Nick was ACTUALly born in SouthBucks/ChalfontSt.Giles ,_a cote_ from D.G.'s (NOt D.C.'s ) ToryShack, but I didN't know that when I had found him the only RealSEXi "ENGLISHman"Brit, as early as last year. I'd Not give (gay) PAEDOlook_ing dave1 like the SHITenglish"BLONDe". Unlike DC, Nick has EUROpean Charm,GOes SKIing, isMULTI...lingual, NOt IMpotent, etc so he's _NUMERO UNO_! but after 1AMERICAn & 2-3ARGENTINE...MEN

  • @KGBfbiSECUpolitia , I belive your Caps Lock is rebelling.

  • Comment removed

  • videosteward,R U aBlackMan?Rock on then! 0:25 white middle/Upper Class"LADieS"=WCs&their(pre)TE­EN "DAUGHTERs"=TOILETs,Beg/Pay 2swallow yr: Cum,Pee+even!SHIT& they'll swallow daveCam just ifU GENTsR Not interested in english,BLONDeBOGs.princessDia­na wasKEENon Pakistani DOCs&EgyptianMen Too coZ the PoloCad=harry'd dad was a Bit Gay,Ginger& limp/Small like daveCam Too+typically English=UNdiscreet! ("FOREIGN"=GENT Nick would Not doThat2his Ladies). videosteward,U'll RuleUK despiteBNP,coZ of "GIRLs"

  • Comment removed

  • @DearAaron

    He's gone from "who" to "whore". Congrats to him.

  • nick clegg aka who? lolololololol

  • If you like this video, you may also enjoy this: a lament for our crap electoral system using the power of dodgy rhymes, sarcasm, stupid jokes, and a faintly daft hat. Search Youtube for "Alternative Election Message"

  • @dannychiversify Labour's contempt even for their own voters runs right the way through.

    Do you think Labour peoples' communist pasts, paedo tendencies or treason were bad enough? You take a look at the Reds' bashing of Christianity, cashing in on still-legal drugs and plotting with the Libs to stay in power even if the Tories win!

    Even other Lefties hate them !

    Click my username to view NEW LABOUR'S TOTALITARIAN ANTI-CHRIST DRUG DEALERS DESERVE AT LEAST POLL DEATH!

  • @TheDustpile

    bashing of Christianity? is this a bad thing? if it wasn't for people like you and your damn religious views the world would be a better place.

  • @supresophie I'm no Bible basher but our basic national culture is based on Christian principles. Our Very Englishness. And churchmen and citizens alike notice the denigration.

    Further to this, Labour Government ministers have claimed that flying the flag is 'racist' and that the 'Rise of Englishness' has coincided with a perceived rise of neo-fascism!

    Charming! And these treasonous slugs are the same ones telling us to feel 'patriotic' for the unwanted European Union!

  • @TheDustpile What rubbish! Christianity is homophobic- is being homophobic english? Christianity is sexist - is being sexist english? Christianity has slowed scientific development - is being obstructive to development english? Christianity believes the world is 6000 years old- you get the point. Oh and Christianity is largely based on paganism.....stonge henge, thats actually is english!

  • @boombip25 You're talking of some totally different church to the ones on teh high street, whatever the denomination.

    It's been centuries since the Church has oppressed on the level of Labour. And what's more, modern Christianity is far more spiritual and serene than those self-confessed college druggies in the Cabinet could ever have dreamed of being themselves.

  • @TheDustpile Spiritual and serene? Have you ever read the old testament?

  • @boombip25 I'm talking New Testament, the replacement.

    ...Where's Islam's New Testament?

  • @TheDustpile actually islam stole the bible from christians and all it had, but changed the words 'jesus' and 'god' to 'allah' and 'mohhamed'

    So, the bible has the true two testaments

  • Don't expect anything to change after the election whoever you vote for. All the main parties are loyal to organizations like Common Purpose, the Bilderberg group, the EU and the globalist banking cartel. All are aiding the subversion of the UK on behalf of the EU. All support the growing police state, the aggressive wars, the banker bailouts and the destruction of British freedom and sovereignty. The voting system is there to give the illusion of choice. Research the new world order.

  • Well done on not taking the half hour or so it would take to flick through the manifestos. I for one like my satire puerile and ill-informed.

  • @Faboba I think your missing the point!

  • ELECTION MELTDOWN

    GATHER 1ST MAY 2PM

    PARLIAMENT GREEN

    On International Workers Day 2010, the assembled multitude will drag effigies of Brown, Cameron, Clegg and Griffin to Parliament for crimes against democracy. We shall then establish a peoples assembly on Parliament Green.

    VIVA DEMOCRACY! POWER TO THE PEOPLE!

  • LOL Excellent vid. Especially the stuff about Clegg hits the nail on the head!

  • Go see Little Dylan (WorldOfDylan) view of the election

  • You should visit my channel and watch my video on nick clegg : )....its important that you watch it : )

  • The Libs are benefiting from the 'protest vote' mentality. This is insane - the issue of greatest concern to the people of Britain today is immigration yet their objection manifests itself as suppport for a party that would massively amplify the problem we already have. A party that will grant amnesty to every sponger that wants to creep into this country and live of our taxes.

    The BNP will not win this election but a protest vote for the BNP will send a very sobering message.

  • @herringfly You are so, so right. A lot of people who hate immigration and multiculturalism will vote Liberal Democrat because they don't realise how insane the Lib Dem policies on immigration are. I'd rather stick with Labour. People don't seem to realise that some Liberal Democrats don't even want any border controls AT ALL !!! That is how irresponsible they are on immigration. When are these wretched politicians going to wake up- THERE ISN'T ENOUGH ROOM

  • @BRIGSTOCK What a load of rubbish, what kind of moron will get the Lib Dem's mixed up with the BNP! For starters I'm guessing that if they are voting they can read the name Liberal and Democrat and realise they are the complete opposite of right wing holocaust denying extremists!

  • @pswanny1ify I don't think you understood what I wrote. My worry is that people will vote Lib Dem without realising how soft they are on immigration. Most of them want an amnesty for illegal immigrants and some of them don't want ANY controls on immigration at all!!!

  • @BRIGSTOCK honestly you dont know what you are talking about. did you even watch the first debate or read the lib dem manifesto yet? hell do you even know what a manifesto is?! lib dems want a controlled, points based and locality based system for immigration like australia has, which would be a damn sight better than the current system.

  • i hate conservative

  • I quite like that!! "I agree with Nick!!"

  • @garydumbill Its clear the Tories and Labour now see the Lib Dems as a threat, as they have started to directly target their policies for criticism. Wouldnt it be nice to hear someone just talking about their policies rather then putting energy into slandering each other!

  • I'm voting Libdem!

  • this video is genius!

  • This video is amazing i've linked it on my facebook. I feel sorry for Clegg's lack of fame, but i'm glad he's getting recognised a bit more. Now that Gordon Brown and David Cameron have decided to make total arses of themselves :D

  • the house of commons looks like fucking bantertown

  • Frekin amazing who the hell r u guys. Lol I want more. Peace n blessings. Emkwan. Fellow youtuber.

  • Why did the holier than though, sqeaky clean Mr Clegg not answer Mr Camerons question as to whether or not the Lib Dems would hand back the donation of 2.5 million pounds they received from the wealthy alleged fraudster who is Apparently still on the run from the police?

  • @patriot17120able I like arguments which use 'apparent' facts, very convincing

  • this video is SO pro-tory. but its still pretty fuckin funny :L

    although david cameron is the human representation of the devil

  • hehe:) Lyric please!!

  • Braintax! Big Tune.

  • The world is not dangerous because of those who do harm but because of those who look at it without doing anything. Albert Einstein.

    The slogans of Newspeak are, War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength. George Orwell.

    Google: IndieGoGo Can Bush Be Prosecuted?, Kymatica (2009) & Zeitgeist - Addendum

    It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society.

    Jiddu Krishnamurti.

    Wiki Sheeple. FCUK Obamageddon. FCUK Obamastan.

  • featuring Braintax

  • Up until tonight the " Nick Clegg - Who? " joke worked, but I think this evening's election debate has really shaken it up. Clegg is now a strong contender.

  • @interrobanging I was going to just spoil my ballot...

    But I'm voting for Nick now :)

  • @edwardtarr1 - ban Sharia too eh? George Galloway on TalkSport used to defend Sharia, saying it was acceptable for it to function in 'Muslim communities' if people wanted it. And the mention of Sharia is noticeable by it's absence on Respect's manifeesto. The candidate taking over Galloway's constituency supports it.

    So what about the disgustingly barbaric Halal slaughter method? The Solidarity Manifesto claims it's against animal cruelty, yet it makes no mention of Halal!

  • @edwardtarr1 - you say that because you support a Stalinist Party that has its tongue up Islam, a barbaric backward religion that worships the prophet Mohammed, a disgusting paedophile who had sex with a 9 year old girl. That says a lot about you - defender of the anti-democratic misogynistic paedophile religion.

  • Wicked Rapping!

  • @edwardtarr1 - No they are the truth. You should have listened to Galloway when he was on TalkSport - he said there is plenty of room for anyone to live in Britain if we concrete over the countryside to build houses there. He welcomes Islam, praises it! Respect is no friend of political diversity either - it wants to ban parties it doesn't like, such as the BNP. So our political system only has parties approved by Galloway and Iqbal. What a joke.

  • @edwardtarr1 - Yeah, vote Respect to open up the borders to anyone who wants to come in. Vote Respect to bring on the great Islamic takeover. Vote Respect to see the end of what democracy we have left in Britain. Vote Respect out of respect for everyone but ourselves.

  • hey this is good please check Public Speech expenses

  • @PublicSpeechMusic Good job

  • Your an odd one! I asked if you had an positive advice rather than saying don't vote for these guys, dont let these people into the country. Things dont change for the better with negative views you know.

    And hell yes...the pope is known to have not handed over sexual offenders, just moved them to new churches.

  • @boombip25 - no, it's you who has the odd mental processes. Why would you expect me to say positive things that I am against? Are you on drugs?

    The pope and his cover-ups are not the issue here. The video is about the 2010 General Election, therefore the degenerate activities of the British political elite in paedophilia is relevent here. The pope is not a candidate, neither is he British. Your attempts at excusing Gordon Brown & co from their nasty little pastimes makes you look the odd one.

  • @CrankCase08 I was commenting directly to you not about the video. You have a lot of negativity and bile but don't seem to offer many positive thoughts or solutions. When have I tried to excuse Gordon Brown of anything... I haven't even mentioned him!!!!!

  • @boombip25 - I've already made my solutions clear all over Youtube.

  • @CrankCase08 Cool, I'll spend the next few hours of my life searching for comments made by you all over Youtube, in order to see what solutions and alternative views to the main parties you have. Or you could just tell me rather than saying everything is bad, politicians are bad, the U.K is bad.....blah blah blah

  • @boombip25 - There's not enough space in these comment to justify my solutions in a single box, and I'm not going to enter a fully blown essay that would necessitate using multiple boxes - that would be vain and selfish. I may be a little vain, but I'm not selfish. It wouldn't be fair to others to blast their comments off the page.

  • @CrankCase08 Oh you big carrot dangling tease you! To be fair, its only really people chatting with you anyway, so wouldn't make a difference.....I'm curious!?

  • @boombip25 - In short, I support th renationalisation of the Utilities and public transport, to leave the EU (and save £60 billion per year) and NATO, withdraw from Afghanistan, a halt to immigration, the expulsion of illegal immigrants, no more bogus asylum seekers, stop foreign aid, an increase in incentives for science education, a return to traditional education methods, removing religion from schools, a ban on halal and kosher slaughter, support small business, and i now run out of space.

  • @CrankCase08 How come you support the BNP, they are forever talking about Christianity, but sounds like your quite reasoned when it comes to the church and state. Did you know if the government removed its funding to the Church of England it would collapse...600m! And yet the church is one of the greatest land owners in the U.K. Why does it bother you how someone want to kill their meat?

  • @boombip25 - I stated my ideal policies. I don't agree with the BNP on everything, but if I wanted a perfect match to my requirements I'dd likely be dead before that appeared, if ever. So it's just a matter of judging what comes close. I have no interest in the Church of England, and it wouldn't bother me if their land was nationalised.

    I'm opposed to Halal & Kosher slaughter because the animal is required to be fully consious when it's throat is ripped open, and that's cruel and barbaric.

  • @CrankCase08 Seems strange to club with an extreme right party, because they offer some of your ideal policies. Surely you can see how that gives support to hatred and bigotry!

  • @boombip25 - Actually, the BNP are not "extreme right". Their economic policies are more left-wing than Labour's, and similar to old Labour, while their social policies are in line with traditional (pre-Cameron) Conservative Party. That's why the BNP's policies are appealing to traditional Labour voters and former members like myself.

    You really need to move on. and stop judging the BNP by how it was when John Tyndall was the chairman. Nick Griffin kicked him out and changed it for the better.

  • @CrankCase08 The same Nick Griffin who has shared a platform with a KKK leader? And who also said this ''I am well aware that the orthodox opinion is that six million Jews were gassed and cremated and turned into lampshades. Orthodox opinion also once held that the world is flat'' Not extreme in the slightest!

  • Comment removed

  • @CrankCase08 Which of the BNP policies are you for then?

  • @boombip25 - Renationalisation of the Utilities and public transport, immediate withdrawal from Afghanistan, withdrawal from EU and NATO, expulsion of illegal immigrants, ending the asylum system, voluntary repatriation, ending political correctness, harsher sentances for criminals, reintroduction of corporal punishment in schools, reintroduction of traditional teaching methods, workers' shareholdings, promotion of organic food, ending foreign aid, no more foreign wars. Now I run out of space.

  • Britain today: Labour's lax morality has helped standards crash through the floor. Just look around you.

    But people are truly waking up, not with just a little help from the Web.

    Click my username or paste title into bar: THINGS CAN ONLY GET LABOUR - WHY THE 'PC' QUISLINGS WILL LOSE THE NEXT ELECTION (SPEECH)

  • @CrankCase08 We base judgments on facts and evidence. Do you have any facts or evidence to show that any of the politicians who you say are paedo's actually are? If they have acted illegally why havent they been prosecuted?

    Being a working class male myself it really frustrates me when people blame 'the man' for every problem. If you want better wages, educate yourself and get a better job. Were probably the most privileged generation to have ever walked the planet!

  • @sorilelly - The only evidence available is made by journalists and former policemen who were involved in the Operation Ore investigations, angered by the cover-up.

    Under the investigation, Pete Townsend and Chris Langham, among others were prosecuted. Then, when top politicians appeared on the list, Blair stopped the investigation and issued a D-Notice to suppress reporting, just before the Iraq invasion.

    Why not blame Brown when we see the folly of his appalling policies in action?

  • @CrankCase08 Operation Ore was stopped because it was flawed and innocent people were accused. It is accepted that the website owners were using card fraud. The Crown Prosecution Service and Police have said this, they are non-partisan and there to enforce the law. Pete Townsend was given a caution, not prosecuted. If an operation is wrong and arresting innocent people would you continue it?

  • @sorilelly - wrong again. Pro-government hacks have claimed it was flawed LONG AFTER the D-notice was imposed in order to counter the rumours. If it was flawed then those already prosecuted would have been pardoned, but they never were. Pete Townend's caution was not withrawn and Langham stayed in prison.

    The CPS and police are not impartial - they are subject to government policy, and are hired and fired by the Home Office.

    Funny how you are keen to excuse Brown, but accuse BNP with no proof.

  • @CrankCase08 A caution is not a prosecution. So the CPS and Police are there to enforce what the government say and not the law? Your brainwashed to be on the defensive- I did not mention the BNP, did not accuse the BNP of anything, did not know you support the BNP (if you do?) they are a legitimate political party and have the right to their views, the same as every other party. I was commenting on your posts nothing else.

  • @sorilelly - Langham was imprisoned, and Townsend received the caution, and both are still required to sign the sex offenders register. The CPS and police are subject to the law, regulations and hiring and firing dictated by the Home Office, a government department headed by the Home Secretary, who is answerable to the Cabinet.

    Okay so I confused you with someone else who was accusing the BNP. I'm getting so many people arguing it's easy to confuse. On that account I apologise.

  • @CrankCase08 Pete Townsend isn't still required to sign the register.

  • Comment removed

  • @sorilelly - That's because his five year requirement term expired. If there was any flaw in Operation Ore he would have received an official pardon and compensation. That never happened.

  • @CrankCase08 Blimey. Well, BNP are def party. It dosent matter if the BNP are Far Right or not! That is a lot more dodgy. Their emphasis on the rights of "indigenious" people is worrying. Esp as I know that many in the BNP (incl Mr Griffin) do not see non-whites BORN in the UK as British! What qualifies as British? Many (myself included ) have ancestry going back to Vikings, Roman(Italian) & French as well as the "indigenous" roots. I think the subtext really is an anti-non-white racist vibe.

  • @Homecutmusic - You are just tailoring your analysis to suit your pre-conceived conclusion. 'Indigenous' does refer to white Britons, and why not? They have been marginalised and forced to accept immigration and multiculturalism without even being consulted by the political elite who are conducting their own agenda. Do you not think that the rights of the indigenous Japanese are impotant to Japan, or the rights of the indigenous natives to North America? So what are you getting at?

  • @CrankCase08 3 questions: How far back does your ancestry to be British? In Roman times York was run by an African centurion dude (Romans weren't that racist eh? AND they invented pizza). Indigenous rights are important, yep. But we indigenous are the powerful majority. Its poor areas where ALL races have it hard. The start of last century we had signs saying 'No Jews & no Irish'. If the being non-indigenous is in terms of race, its racism no? Is legendary author Rudyard Kipling indigenous?

  • @Homecutmusic - I'm not going to go into what ancestry is required to be British - I don't care, it's subjective. However, I will not subscribe to the ethnic cleansing of the white British, which appears to be the agenda for the Marxists.

    As for that 'African' that ran York - he wasn't black. He was Lucius Septimius Severus, a white Italian from a wealthy family settled in Lybia.

    The fact is that Britain has always been white north European, like it or not.

    Kipling was British.

  • @CrankCase08 Ethic cleansing of white British? Do you not feel ashamed using that phrase, ethnic cleansing? Define ethnic cleaning then rethink what you've just said.

  • @freedomnow25 why should I feel ashamed? I don't need to define anything just to placate your fake self-righteous patronising tone.

  • @CrankCase08 You small minded idiot! Indigenous natives of North America are a minority who have been almost wiped out by emigrating europeans and brits! How can you compare a minority group in their own land to whatever your defintion is of 'indigenous' brits.

  • @freedomnow25 - Oh dear, more self-righteous indignation.

    Native Americans were forced to suffer ethnic cleansing and be labelled racial inferiors at the hand of the European invaders. The fact is, they are the indigenous natives, and now they are almost extinct. The fact is, that they are a definition of indigenous that is just as valid as the Japanese in Japan, the blacks in South Africa, the Arabs of the Middle East, and the whites of Britain.

  • @CrankCase08 The whites? Why not the British of Britain? What relevance does skin colour have?

  • @freedomnow25 - What difference does skin colour have? You have just made an argument in favour of continuing the white minority rule in South Africa. Well done.

  • @CrankCase08 You referred to british the 'ethnic cleansing of the white British'!!!!!!!! How have i denied anything about native Americans? i Was asking if you feel ashamed saying - ''ethnic cleansing of the white British'' Do you not know what ethnic cleansing is? clearly not

  • @freedomnow25 - Stil patronising. I can read what you said.

    Ethnic cleansing of the white British is going on in many parts of London, Slough, Birmingham, etc. The white flight is occurring thoughout the large conurbations of the country. In London, English speaking white kids are now in the minority, and ethnic immigrants tend to reproduce much more than whites, and within another generation, ethics will be the majority there. London is no longer British, it's been colonised.

  • @CrankCase08 What about non-white British? You use throw away facts based on your own opinion ''ethnic immigrants tend to reproduce much more than whites'', rather than fact. What does it mean to be British anyway? Are we not anglo-saxon, norman, viking, etc etc etc- who happen to liv within the administrative borders considered to be the U.K.

  • @freedomnow25 - You've answered your own question. Anglo-Saxon, Norman, Viking, Celt. The indigenous British are made up of descendants of these white people.

  • @CrankCase08 But with your reasoning they should never have been allowed to come to this country! Therefore you desend from something you dont agree with! How does that feel? Do you hate the look of your soiled dna in the mirror?

  • @freedomnow25 - That response is worthy of a silly schoolboy or an immature student. Those were as a result of conquests that stabilised after the Norman invasion.

  • @CrankCase08 So can you see how immature you reasoning is? So it's ok take a land by force if you happen to be white?

  • @freedomnow25 - Your reasoning is immature, full of ignorance. It just happened to be that those invasions happened 944+ years ago and it's that history that has brought Britain about. The (white) Germans tried to invade Britain but they were rightly repulsed. The desirability of invasions by the Normans and earlier is irrelevant. If Arabs had invaded Britain hundreds of years ago then Britain would be different, but it didn't happen.

  • @CrankCase08 So how can anybody be 'indigenous' if were all clearly a happy (in most cases) mix of races who wandered out of africa 100,000 years ago!

  • @freedomnow25 - the indiginous British is the mix that developed after the Norman invasion. That's not difficult to understand. As far as the Africa thing is concerned, that's just an unproven theory promoted by self-hating white liberals.

  • @CrankCase08 the Indiginous British are determined by the Germanic Anglo Saxon Invasion not a mix after the Norman invasion the difference was that the Anglo Saxons had a dark age Genocide removing the Romans & Celts from England but the Normans didnt the Normans were actually an army & set of Royals which ruled the Anglo Saxon's they didnt have the numbers to populate England.

  • @FrollyNeptune - wrong. The Romans removed the Celts from England, as explained by Tacitus. The Normans became a new ruling class. However, that was the last invasion until William I was invited to overthrow James II, which was merely a change of King. I never claimed that the Normans wiped out the Saxons. So I don't know what you are trying to prove.

  • @CrankCase08 - Seriously the Romans didnt perform a genocide on the Celts it was Honnestly the Anglo Saxons who also killed off the British Romani yeah the Romans would have been cruel with the Celts because the Celtic people were constantly revolting but they were populating England a lot of them had joined the Roman Ranks by the time the Anglo Saxons arrived. " indiginous British is the mix that developed after the Norman invasion" < no it was before with the Saxons.

  • @FrollyNeptune What you are referring to is the origins of the modern Britons - the anglo Saxons. However, the last assimilation was the Normans, who also introduduced the Latin content to the modern English language.

    It was the Romans who liquidated the druids and then suppressed the Celts, driving them to the edges on the British Isles.

    I'm not going to respond to your other comments because I always try to keep it to one block; using more swamps the page and is unfair to others.

  • @CrankCase08 yeah the Normans did contribute to the Culture & form the Language because the Saxons at the time were using what people call Old English which they use in Friesland today But Ethnically the Anglo saxon English people didnt change because like i said the Normans were just a bunch of Military Regiments & a set of Nobels that just ruled the Anglo Saxons. which basically means the native English today in a large majority are simply Anglo Saxons.

  • @CrankCase08 at the time the Anglo Saxons invaded England it was a Roman state & yeah the Romans did suppress the Celtic people but they did not however perform the genocide on the celts after time many of the Celtic people assimilated with the Romans just like how many of the Gauls & Germanic people did Romans used them in there Ranks, im talking about late age Roman Empire i mean look up the Holy Roman Empire (Germany) gives you a good idea how they assimilated.

  • @CrankCase08 and when the Anglo Saxons arrived to England they found Celtic people living as Romans & part of the Roman army remeber im talking about late age Rome not early & the Anglo Saxons did honnestly have a dark age genocide on the whole population in England they simply raided everything and pushed the remaining Celts into Wales.

  • @FrollyNeptune classic case of TLTR there, google it if you dunno what it means.

  • @TheSpamFilter Teaching and Learning Technology Roundtable it comes up as? with all educational programs that can be taken in America??

  • @CrankCase08 - The Normans simply didnt have the numbers to make a big change in the population they were basically a couple of Regimental armies & set of Nobels as time went by England would have recived more migration through different means from areas such as France,Norway,Denmark,Sweden ect but the numbers wouldnt have made much of a different compared to the Anglo Saxon population were talking about very little amounts of migration so the indiginous British had devoloped before the Normans

  • @CrankCase08 in the USA for we call the British decendant population Anglo Saxons as time went by in Britain the English eventually bred out the majority of the native welsh & scotish & Irish the racial groups Celtic & Gaelic today when people say there welsh or Irish or scottish there most likely mixed bred with Anglo Blood because the English did to these people the same as they did to the New Zealanders,Australlians,Indian­s,Native Americans officers would breed with local native women ect.

  • @CrankCase08 its why theres so many neo Nazis because Germanic Blood is everywhere when you look into the History of Germania at the fall of the Roman Empire & people tend to judge others by there ethnic groups History so they lable Nationalists as German Nazi sympathizers in Britain & yeah ive got to admit the British system is certainly trying to brainwash you lot with your History about how you all have African Blood from African Romans ect.

  • @FrollyNeptune - Unfortunately, we have a ruling elite heavily populated by Marxists and former Communists who are trying to destroy the traditional fabric of British society, to impose a cosmopolitan multicultural experiment onto us. We were never asked or consulted. Ever since the fall of the Soviet Bloc, they have been imposing this tactic as espoused by Italian Communist Antonio Gramsci.

  • @CrankCase08 Yeah i know it seems like most European Countrys now are trying to become "Multicultured" way i see it there trying to make Europe similar to the states which i dont agree with because multiculturism simply doesnt work here in the states it causes to much rivalry & racial hatred for various reasons you have your Black, White, Hispanic & Asian populated areas which are extremely segregated reality is the USA is not United at all.

  • @CrankCase08 im biracial myself my mother is Maori & my father is originally from Ireland and being biracial in america really does make you see how much racism & pure hatred there is on all sides im planning on moving to New zealand simply because of how bad America has become i wouldnt wish the American type system onto any nation. it would be really bad for Europe dont you have problems with middle eastern Islamics there already?

  • @CrankCase08 Ruling elite? We voted them in....every few years we have these things called elections- i think there may be one pretty soon you know

  • @freedomnow25 - Do you think elections actually change anything? If they did, they'd be abolished. Why do you think Labour governments always behave like Tory governments? When Tory MPs defects to Labour they become ministers! The LibDems would be no different -note that many LibDems, like Vince Cable, are former Labourites. Why do you think the media only focusses on these three? Same policies! Labour, Tory, LibDem and the media - they serve the interests of the Establishment, not ours.

  • @CrankCase08 So Thatcher didn't effect the country at all?

    Also your point about the media is rubbish. The media are ratings driven so they produce what people want to see, if people don't like something they will turn off/not visit the website/not buy the paper. Considering the bnp polled only 0.74% of votes in the last election they have received a hugely disproportionate amount of media time- the media is drawn to the sensational or different....thats why its news worthy in the first place

  • Comment removed

  • @freedomnow25 - not at all. she behaved like a Tory, she just didn't have to rely on the trade union paymasters. Do you actually consider the Callaghan government 'socialist'? If the media was ratings driven, then the likes of the Guardian, Mirror, etc. would have supported the Tories in the 80's, but they didn't, although they did attack the miners' strike - an example of how they serve the Establishment while paying lip service to the supposed 'Leftist Labour'.

  • @CrankCase08 I can't comment on callaghan- before my time. But youve just said thatcher didnt change the country at all? she didnt break any miner strikes, fight a war, try in introduce poll tax? i suppose tony blair didnt change the country at all? what with illegal wars, removal of our civil liberties.  If the media are not rating driven how do you explain the huge amount of coverage the bnp get compared to their support. never heard the phrase- 'if it bleeds it leads?'

  • @freedomnow25 - Unlike you, I've learned the history. What I stated was, no matter what government we get, they are always effectively Tory governments. The only difference is that Labour is forced to be somewhat restrained in it's dealings with Trade Unions due to they beingLabour's backers. Individual taxes are irrelevant to overall state management. All main parties subscribe to global corporate capitalism and the EU. Whatever coverage the BNP get, it's always biased against them.

  • @CrankCase08 Bias for or against isnt important...its the exposure that is. Look at question time- the BNP's popularity went up.

    Also don't presume I do not know history- Ive no interest in waxing lyrical about things i haven't lived through based on what ive read.

    All parties need to subscribe to this- how would we eat if it wasnt for the global market? Fruit and veg will potentially be running low this week if airspace doesnt open soon

  • @freedomnow25 - the exposure, followed by continual lies. If you knew about history you'd mknow about the Callaghan governemt. Britain used to be more self sufficient in food than now, until the EU put paid to that.. However, global capitalism is not only about food, it's about shifting capital to highest profit target, and obtaining cheapest sources of labour, and this leads to reduced living standards with low quality goods.

  • @CrankCase08 Doesnt matter, exposure makes people interested and seek out more information. I know about Callaghan, but wouldnt comment on something wasnt old enough to know anything about or experience at the time.

    The Uk does not have enough land to produce enough food for its own citizens, without costs soaring. fact

  • @freedomnow25 - Apart from the fact that you don't have the data to show that we cannot be self sufficient in food, you appear completely determined not to get my point. Whether you agree with issues or not, the fact is that all three main parties are virtually identical on everything, and this state is promoted by the media. therefore there is in reality no choice other than faces; we do effectively have a one-party state.

  • @CrankCase08 Don't vote for the 3 main parties then. If things are so bad why don't you emigrate?

  • @freedomnow25 - I'm not going to let those bastards push me out. That's what they would like.

  • @CrankCase08 Yep, a country with no residents sure punches a lot of weight on the international stage!

  • @freedomnow25 Scientists beleive that Africa was the Home of the hominid ape Humans evolved from, humanity started in Africa but once the Hominid apes evolved into what are todays Native African people a lot of them migrated away from Africa & in doing so carried on Evolving into the Different breeds of humans we have today.Which explains a lot because theres always been this mystery on why Native Africans -

  • @freedomnow25 - it explains why Native Africans have Stronger Bone density,different skeletal build,longer limbs,different skulls,& the ape like facial features people always rant on about, when you look at the images that have been generated of these early Hominid apes they have more incommon with todays Africans than the other breeds of humans. as for the coulor of skins skin coulor is only determined by the climate notice africans palms there white.

  • @freedomnow25 I am not talking about BI-Racial mixed race people with part African decent but rather the full on native Black Africans here in America anyone with slight African Blood in them gets tagged as Black African ( take Obama for example) but the reality is most black africans in america are not due to the slave trade the majority are bi-racial mixed breed. look at Africa for Mans evolutionary Links.

  • @freedomnow25 - You are are the idiot. You deny that the natives of North America are indigenous because they have been almost wiped out, and then suggest that White north Europeans of British descent are also not indigenous. Yet you don't deny that the Japanese are indigenous. So the Maoris are a minority in New Zealand, but I imagine you don't consider them indigenous either.