Moon is not continuously falling on earth nor it is losing it momentum. To moon, it appears that it is traveling on a straight line even though it is going around the earth in a circle.
Why? Because the space itself is curved around the earth. Moon just follows it path in space.
No loss of momentum due to circular motion and no continuously falling.
So far earth went around the sun for about 5 billion times (5x10^9) without losing any momentum and the moon went around earth for about 60 billion times (12x5x10^9) without losing a inch because of zero loss of circular momentum. Both earth and the moon are traveling on a straight line (proof).
Very interesting- Olbers' Paradox. Huh. As a "Casual Armchair Cosmology Enthusiast", (I watch a lot of Science Channel & read Hawking, Kaku, Smoot & the like). I have never heard of this before. Einstein missed this? I'll have to drop his "genius" status down a notch for that one! He's still awesome though. And who needs CMBR confirmation from W.M.A.P when you have this? Just kidding of course- I like CMBR :)
@RabidApe I was under the impression Olber's Parodox failed. His assumptions were based on a static Universe, he obviously was unaware of Red Shift or expansion in the early 19th Century, and thus wrong. See Isaac Asimov's essay "The Black of Night, 'Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction', Nov '64; reprinted in 'Asimov on Astronomy',Doubleday, 1974.
rabidape, you may be greater than two, but to me, you're always <3 :) also, i saw that hovind video where he uses your old clip about gravity. thats wicked old :)
i sift through videos all day because i have no life. a hovind video clip cuts to you saying "evolution is just a theory, like gravity" and you drop a pen. he goes "gravity is not a theory" then continues to be a fucking tool. i saw it actually in someone's video i am currently subscribed to in the past few days (maybe the person i am sub'd to inserted your clip in but it looks as though hovind's video actually used it). but i have quite a few subs and am not the most mentally organized so ???:)
some more organized nerd can probably tell you. i am sifting through my list but navigating the recent posts is sketchy due to some that have been seen not showing up unless you look at the persons channel :)
i'm so sad that i have hovind's older videos (the complete collection) and i have bittorrent downloading his 14 hour later series of videos. It's a good laugh to watch and if he brings up a point you dont know about, it's good fun to go and research as to exactly why he is talking such shite lol
dude he is a SCIENTIST and "knows" things...like what a molecule, base pair, genome, dna, etc are (not). :) what a fucking douche. i am more educated than he is. which is sad :)
i know, but it's sooooo funny my friend that it's irresistable.
If you watch those videos, you can see the ENTIRE contents of venomfangx's mind lolololol.
Amazing how venomfang claims to be an interllectual but couldnt be arsed to check out kent's claims independantly. I suppose that to do that would go against his cheap money making agenda, just a theory lol
The law and force of the Planets are explained in the VEDAS.
We are only understanding what the ancients already knew.
ANDROID697 2 years ago
Moon is not continuously falling on earth nor it is losing it momentum. To moon, it appears that it is traveling on a straight line even though it is going around the earth in a circle.
Why? Because the space itself is curved around the earth. Moon just follows it path in space.
No loss of momentum due to circular motion and no continuously falling.
MeX2004 2 years ago
Consider this:
So far earth went around the sun for about 5 billion times (5x10^9) without losing any momentum and the moon went around earth for about 60 billion times (12x5x10^9) without losing a inch because of zero loss of circular momentum. Both earth and the moon are traveling on a straight line (proof).
MeX2004 2 years ago
Very interesting- Olbers' Paradox. Huh. As a "Casual Armchair Cosmology Enthusiast", (I watch a lot of Science Channel & read Hawking, Kaku, Smoot & the like). I have never heard of this before. Einstein missed this? I'll have to drop his "genius" status down a notch for that one! He's still awesome though. And who needs CMBR confirmation from W.M.A.P when you have this? Just kidding of course- I like CMBR :)
Objectivist2112 2 years ago
cool lecture
CarnifexAaron 2 years ago
thanks for sticking this up rabid, really enjoy these!
WindRunnerVX 2 years ago
Newton didn't sit under an Apple Tree, it was a Fig Tree, ergo, Fig Newton's.
ubuibiok 2 years ago
uhh please tell me that's a joke. it's named for a city named newton.
adrenacrumb 2 years ago
Fire+Water = Tequila. Priceless.
petehjr1 2 years ago
wow. Kuhn was right!!!!
unscdoom 2 years ago
I saw that Hovind video. Kent never used it himself, it was a creationist user who spliced the two clips together.
lordcodicus 2 years ago
I thoroughly enjoyed that, thanks.
Sp00lDonkey 2 years ago
oh yea... more money for nasa! and all other fields for that matter.
Sp00lDonkey 2 years ago
Good stuff keep in coming.
LuciousVBogeymanProd 2 years ago
lol, no prob!
Did you hear the reference to Alan Guth?
He's uploading right now...
;D
RabidApe 2 years ago
@RabidApe I was under the impression Olber's Parodox failed. His assumptions were based on a static Universe, he obviously was unaware of Red Shift or expansion in the early 19th Century, and thus wrong. See Isaac Asimov's essay "The Black of Night, 'Magazine of Fantasy and Science Fiction', Nov '64; reprinted in 'Asimov on Astronomy',Doubleday, 1974.
washmlakid 1 year ago
rabidape, you may be greater than two, but to me, you're always <3 :) also, i saw that hovind video where he uses your old clip about gravity. thats wicked old :)
Neeboopsh 2 years ago
lol, thanks!
"also, i saw that hovind video where he uses your old clip about gravity. thats wicked old :) "
I'm not sure what you're talking about and I am VERY intrigued.
TELL ME MORE!
RabidApe 2 years ago
i sift through videos all day because i have no life. a hovind video clip cuts to you saying "evolution is just a theory, like gravity" and you drop a pen. he goes "gravity is not a theory" then continues to be a fucking tool. i saw it actually in someone's video i am currently subscribed to in the past few days (maybe the person i am sub'd to inserted your clip in but it looks as though hovind's video actually used it). but i have quite a few subs and am not the most mentally organized so ???:)
Neeboopsh 2 years ago
some more organized nerd can probably tell you. i am sifting through my list but navigating the recent posts is sketchy due to some that have been seen not showing up unless you look at the persons channel :)
Neeboopsh 2 years ago
i'm so sad that i have hovind's older videos (the complete collection) and i have bittorrent downloading his 14 hour later series of videos. It's a good laugh to watch and if he brings up a point you dont know about, it's good fun to go and research as to exactly why he is talking such shite lol
WindRunnerVX 2 years ago
dude he is a SCIENTIST and "knows" things...like what a molecule, base pair, genome, dna, etc are (not). :) what a fucking douche. i am more educated than he is. which is sad :)
Neeboopsh 2 years ago
i know, but it's sooooo funny my friend that it's irresistable.
If you watch those videos, you can see the ENTIRE contents of venomfangx's mind lolololol.
Amazing how venomfang claims to be an interllectual but couldnt be arsed to check out kent's claims independantly. I suppose that to do that would go against his cheap money making agenda, just a theory lol
WindRunnerVX 2 years ago
I finally watched and it was well worth it!!
paulusmagirl 2 years ago
Ten out of five.
I've seen this guy before but I can't think where, but not this lecture.
GWR3440 2 years ago
Thank you for uploadin' this. :)
Y0urHumbleNarrat0r 2 years ago