Funny Shia sheikh fails to lie about Bukhari and Muslim - English subtitles

[MIZTA187]

LOLOLOLOLZZZ THE LAST PART KILLED IT LOLOLOLOLZZZZ

[Broadcaster17]

@PEACETVBANGLASYLHETY True indeed, you quoted the right verse at the right time. May the Quran lead the way and clarify all confusions.

[SuperiorRationalism]

This is clearly edited, and intended to serve the sunni side and divide Islam. The ending was really immature -_-

[MrMuaviakhan]

hanafi.shafi,malki,hanbli or salfi all believe in sahaba r.a.

[MrMuaviakhan]

beware my all ahl al sunnah brothers.....shia is biggest enemy of islam and they use term wahabi for those ahl al sunnah who know reality of shiaism.

[MrMuaviakhan]

shia belief taqiah

They all agree that Taqi'ah is a prescribed duty and a pillar of their faith. Their schools of thought could not stand without it. They learn its principles and methods and they practice it,especially if they are in dire circumstances. They exaggeratedly praise and flatter those whom they consider disbelievers, whom they consider deserving of slaughter and destruction. The verdict of Kufr is passed on anyone who is not of their sectarian school,

[MrMuaviakhan]

I believe in the Oneness of ALLAH [S.W.T], Muhammad [S.A.W] is the last Prophet of ALLAH [S.W.T], Quran bestowed upon Muhammad [S.A.W] is doubtless from Al-Hamd till Wannas, all the Sahabah [R.A] were Mo'min, ALLAH [S.W.T] agreed with them and they with ALLAH [S.W.T], Ummahat-ul-Momineen [R.A] are the wives of Prophet Muhammad [S.A.W] and are the Noble Mothers of Muslims.

[SuperiorRationalism]

Poor editing skills

[totalhassan]

I hve a question

If some1 died and his parents and friends say he doesn't lie

K

But his parents say he prayed fajr very morning but his friends say he didn't always pray fajr in the morning

Who would u believe?????

If his family then who died is prophet mohammad (pbuhahf) and his family is hall batt and u r Shia

If his friends then u r Sunni and the person who died is prophet mohammad (pbuhahf) and his friends r sahaba

Dont try to trick urself

And since wen can we elect people to ru

[Broadcaster17]

@totalhassan Do you have a doubt when God himself stated clearly in the Quran that the prophet's companions are pure and they are not to be ridiculed because Allah knows the true intentions of everyone and that his companions (Sahaba) were the great of men. Do you doubt the knowledge and statements of Allah? Of course, a person can have bad friends but if Allah said in Quran that prophet Muhammad (PBUH)'s companions were amongst the righteous than who are we to make 2nd judgments.

[raza2nice]

@Broadcaster17 HAVE U READ SURE MUNAFIQUN READ AND SEE WHAT ALLAH SAYS ABOUT COMPANIONS

[Broadcaster17]

@raza2nice I have read many translations of the Quran and your assumption that Sur-e-Munafiqun talks about the Prophet (PBUH)'s companions is a faulty one because Quran clearly verifies the truthfulness of these companions and the good news of Heaven to them in Sur-e-Tauba. Surely the Quran does not contradict itself so my request to you is to stop living on assumptions when you can find clear sentences in the Quran. Salam.

[flurto666]

Being a sunni mean you can try to Insult prophet Mohammad sawas if you see all Non Muslim who try to insult Prophet Mohammad sawa always take Sunni books like Bukhari , Muslim becase if you read Bukhari you will become like that where fake hadiths are made to show prophet Mohammad sawas as an common man who do same kind of things as those arab use to do Just read Baab e Haaiz of Bukhari book 1 its a shame for sunnis to talk about prophet and his wivies like that

[SuperiorRationalism]

Fails to lie? More like you fail in editing, spreading lies and fabrications against the Shias. If you were a true Muslim you wouldn't be representing your sect in this disrespectful manner.

[Islam1491]

The truth is that there is no such thing as Imamah, and the Doors of Prophethood have forever been closed with the Prophet Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم). There is nobody after him, and anyone who claims this is a Dajjal. The last Prophet was Muhammad (صلّى الله عليه وآله وسلّم) and his name was mentioned in the Quran. Where are these other so-called Infallible Imams in the Quran? Why did Allah not include them?

[TheShingami]

May Allah guide the Sunnis (Sunnah of Umar) to the right path. You believe you are a true Muslim yet you insult the Shia people. You call them 'Shit' and you Kill them. Is this the religion of Peace? Is this the religion Muhammad (saws) left for us? Since the time of Umar your faith has turned into anger and hatred towards others.

Asalamu Aleykum - From a Kafir

'The Truth is present but we can't see it'..

[SunniPureIslam]

@TheShingami The reason Shias hate Umar specifically more than anyone else (although he was the 2nd Khaleefa, not the 1st) is because he ended the Persian Empire. So the purpose of creating the new esoteric religion called Shiasm, was to maintain a different identity as much as possible. Now it is used to make money and collect khums money, and money from shrines, in the billions. Thats why they dont care about details of creed, as long as one is politically loyal to gangs of Wilayat Al Faqih.

[AmigoZKaKa]

@SunniPureIslam why do you say that Shia hate Umar? i'm a shia, and i'm learned to love everything Allah has created. But in your sunni books, it stands that the one who kill Umar, is a hypocrite and allah will punish him hard etc. But the one who kill Ali is a practicing muslim and nothing is wrong about that.

But prophet Mohammed (saws) clearly said that: ''If you love Ali, you love me. And if you hate Ali, you hate me.''

So why are you changing these words and call Shia's shit?

[Islam1491]

@AmigoZKaKa , WHICH SUNNI BOOK SAYS THAT KILLER OF ALI IS A MUSLIM' KILLER OF ALI WAS A KHARJI AND KHARJIS WERE ORIGINALLY SHIAS. THIS IS REASON THAT SHIAS NEVER CREATE FUSS OF 10 DAYS ON DEATH OF ALI NEITHER SHIAS CURSE KILLER OF ALI ROUND THE YEAR AS THEY DO IN CASE OF HUSSEIN BECAUSE KILLER OF ALI IS FROM THEIR OWN PARTY.

[AmigoZKaKa]

@Islam1491 HAHAH, you are so ignorant! No wonder you hate shias. You dont even know the story of husseins death. ALIs party were going to the sunnis to try to get peace and that they would be mercyfull to the shias. So he took hes horse to the sunniland with hes newborn baby, to show that he came in peace. What did the sunnis do? they shot an arrow in the babys throat, and cut Husseins head and celebrated.

May Allah fics your ignorant brain, brother

[Ali221539]

@AmigoZKaKa -------------- If necessary , I will shoot an arrow in your mom's vagina to stop her giving births to sons like you. Shias are not real muslims. If I had a sword in my hand, I would have cut down the necks of all shias living on this planet. Go to hell , you bloody Shias.

[shafimek83]

@AmigoZKaKa haha.. nice story man.. may b this story they tel in iran 2nursery school children.. SHIAN E ALI OF KUFA... WANTD SOME1 TO BCUM THEIR LEADER, THEY SENT 100'S OF LETTERS 2 IMAM HUSSAIN 2COME 2IRAQ ND BCUM THEIR LEADER. BUT WEN HUSSAIN CAME THOSE 30,000 SHIAS OF KUFA BCAME INVISIBLE..(MAGICAL POWERS OF SHIA 2BETRAY) 1ST THEY BETRAYED ALI, THEN HASAN & safeer e hussain MUSLIM BIN AQEEL.. FINALLY HUSSAIN.. 30,000 SHIAS CANT FIGHT JUS 3000 SOLDIERS OF YAZEED.. VERY BRAVE SHIAS HAHA...

[Broadcaster17]

@AmigoZKaKa Do you even know the history of Karbala? Do you remember the Shi'a of Kufa and their treachory to Hussayn? Don't argue to someone else about history when you yourself don't know history. Look closer, the people who you call Sunnis were actually the Shi'a of Kufa. They claimed partisanship to the Ahlal-Bayt, does that sound Sunni to you? They gave word to the Sayyiduna Husayn to fight Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad and then disgressed. Sahaba were in Mecca, not Kufa. Open your eyes.

[cfcyusuf11]

@TheShingami The rest of the question is done made by @SunniPureIslam . ..

But Never in you're life, I say NEVER say that Sunnis kill Shias. What happens to the sunnis in Iran? What happens to the sunnis in Iraq? Truth is hidden.

[MrMuaviakhan]

@TheShingami may Allah guide u product of jews.aamin

[sarni786]

@TheShingami Yep! You Shiites are evil filthy people. May Allaah inflict cancer upon you dirty Rafidah!

[12hamida]

LOOK HOW STUPID THIS RAFIDI SHIA IS NOW ALL SHIA GO DO RESEARCH ON AL KAFI AND NAHAL BALAGA SAME THING LOL SAME THING AND WAY HE IS SAYING ABOUT BUKHARI AND MUSLIM SHIA ARE SO IGNORANT AND TRAP IN LIES

[786sheerali]

loll bravooo another try ;) u need to propagate shia islam a bit more better my brother come on u can dooooooo it lol :) mashallah xxx x

[ScopedOUT2]

Did anyone know that the shia take their hadith from donkeys?

[dreamerr17]

Wrong Translation

Before making laugh and lie on shia ,, learn the Arabic rules first ..

He said ( bukhari & muslim ) DEPEND ON other men ,, just like how ibn hajar , ahmad ibn hanbal , abd al-thahabi ,, DEPEND ON other men ,,

Or tell me!!! did Jebrail came to the head of al-bukhari and told him this peson is loyal, this man is lier , this man is from kufa ??????? of course they depend on other men ,,, learn Arabic first then came to neigtiate your fools with shia ,, bless you

[SunniPureIslam]

@dreamerr17 Arabic is my mother tongue so lie to someone else. He didnt say its like Al Dhahabi etc took from others, he said they took their authentication from others such as Ibn Hajar Al Dhahabi etc. The video is posted in Arabic, 100,000 + views and not a single person made this absurd lie/claim of yours. No matter how you twist it, it cant possibly mean what you said. Dont ask people to learn Arabic when your TOP silent "scholar" Sistani is unable to speak in Arabic in public.

[dreamerr17]

@SunniPureIslam

Excuse me mister! you can take a quote of this sentence and say it to anyone know Arabic in depth, if your mother know Arabic, I am Arabian Kuwaiti and from Saudia Arabia Al-Qasim origins (Arab ansestors from both father and mother) and was a perfect student in Arabic subject.

excuse me about Sistani because I am new to being shia and he is not my scholar if though its not a shame since he has all that knowledge and all others testifed him

[SunniPureIslam]

@dreamerr17 Without telling you my roots, you are lying about your accusation. Theres no way on earth can it mean that. If you are truthful, write in Arabic, EXACTLY what this man said, and do "Iraab" of Arabic grammer. How can "He took from others, such as Ibn Hajar, Al Dhahabi etc" mean "He took from others just like Ibn Hajar took from others? What would the point be even!? Promoting Sunni scholars!? His whole point was to discredit Bukhari, so your lie is absurd.

[dreamerr17]

@SunniPureIslam

Don't forget that your both Sunnis & Wahhabi scholars were alot of them Persians & foreigns ! like Abu Hanifah, al-Hakim Nishapuri, al-Bukhari, Ibn Majah, Tirmidhi, etc... don't forget that Salman the Persian (RA) was better than 1000 or more of the Arabic companions of the prophet(Pbuh&HH) , don't forget the Sahih hadeeths that shows that Persians are one of the best nations besides Arabs.. Im pretty sure you know all these facts but im just remembering you.

[dreamerr17]

@SunniPureIslam

He is saying that al-Bukhari & Muslim depend on others to authenticate the hadeeth, they are just like ibn Hanbal, Ibn Hajar, and Al-Dhahabi also those depend on others to authenticate the hadeeth.

Sayyed Moneer used the "Kaaf" letter is an preposition that do the meaning of Simile. Simile the previous with the past. Now you've left all the beauty science he says in all life aspects and just being ridicule and not to show respect? thats strange enough.

[SunniPureIslam]

@dreamerr17 Thats impossible. What would the point be? promoting Sunni scholars? The context proves the point even further! Heres the full video Sp-P_NvdHWA see from minute 8. His point was to discredit Al Bukhari. This is why he said Bukhari and Muslim depending on scholars before them such as Ibn Hajar erc. Then he proceeds to try to discredit Ibn Hajar etc. Accept the truth with no ego/pride. How much Shias lie to justify other lies is unbelievable!.

[arabmuslimpower]

@SunniPureIslam woow. i thumbed up your comment, but i completly regretted it when you said "TOP silent "scholar" sistani is unable to speak arabic in public." first of all why do u have t add the disrespect and hate? second, the uploader ur talking to IS sunni. :) peace be with you brother <3

[SunniPureIslam]

@arabmuslimpower Im not sure what you're talking about brother. I I was talking to a Shia, and there was a point about the Sistani comment, which is that hes a top scholar who cant speak in Arabic. How can he be a scholar, interpret Qur'aan and Sunnah on such a high level, if he doesnt know Arabic? Its all about money and political influence to people like Al Sistani who work for Wilayat Al Faqih people in Iran. This isnt "hate" its something factual and very connected to the topic.

[arabmuslimpower]

@SunniPureIslam yeah i brought that on my self... :/ u ARE the uploader?? so i made no sence in that comment exept when i read ur comment, it sounded very much like you were insulting shia'in and sistani. i know many people who follow him, and i dnt thing just cuz hes not arab he's not a trust worthy muslim scholar.

[GeVdZh]

Poor editing. He's obviously pointing out that the compilers of the books (Bukhari, Ibn Hanbal, etc...) were not present during the time of the Prophet (pbuh). Of course, you won't link the original lecture ;) Nice try.

[SunniPureIslam]

@GeVdZh obviously? How in the world did you get to this genius conclusion? Whats obvious is your pride and ego, my friend.

[SunniPureIslam]

@GeVdZh The original lectures proves our point even further. Why didnt YOU bring it forward? Its everywhere. I will do it for you, heres the full lecture Sp-P_NvdHWA

[ManhajSalafi]

@SunniPureIslam Salamu alaikum! I just tried the link and it doesn't work. Do u mind posting the whole link please?? Jazaakallah Khayr.... and LOL at the ending!!

[ManhajSalafi]

@SunniPureIslam Actually don't worry about the link!! It does work, i just typed it in the search thing!!

[Iranshit]

Well done a good vid and good answers to the shittite irooni cos he comes spreads fitna and lies and tgen disappears lol this is the way of taqiyyah the way of the devil cos the devils main trait is lying falsehood destruction darkness completely opposite to light truth rightfulness hence sunni are the light trying to disinguish the fire of the devil in islam!

[helpoj]

hehehe im still trying to figure out if this man knows what his on about

did he just say that bukhari and muslim "took" these narations from ahmad ibn hanbal?

[SunniPureIslam]

@helpoj and Al Dhahabi and Ibn Hajar LOL

[helpoj]

@SunniPureIslam i wonder if his seen this video lol

[SunniPureIslam]

This is their level of knowledge in hadeeth watch?v=5NbGpm_PzHI

[SunniPureIslam]

irooni, stop it with the foul language. As for Shia belief in corruption of the Quraan, we don't need to even quote shia sources (as you'd practice shia taqiyyah and say oh its weak or fabricated etc, as your Imam al khoui promotes it when debating Sunni), your scholars say it all the time on Shia TV, watch the second half of this video. watch?v=OvRuzP4jM0c . Your top scholars write books about it for Gods sake. So please respect peoples intelligence and cut the taqiyyah.

[SunniPureIslam]

A reason why below the Shia mentions Umar raa specifically instead of Abu Bakr raa who was the first leader is because he ended the Persian Empire and brought Islam to Iran. Umar raa was hesitant to do so as Islam was spreading faster than scholars could teach. So empire sympathizers started to spread lies and thrived on turmoil. See "Iran, Empire of the mind" by Michael Axworthy in which Iranian professors admit Shiasm is only to keep their pre-islamic identity & not melt into the Islamic world

[SunniPureIslam]

@ irooni and the reason for this low level "messy" arguments is clear. Historically shiasm could never exist except when theres turmoil. It thrives on rumors and messiness when theres turmoil. Its also why today, an organized proper discussion can't be held because they'd face solid organized thoughts in a logical pattern, as throwing random ideas right and left, false narrations, with some flawed logic on top, can't find a place in a decent discussion. This has been proved on televised debates

[SunniPureIslam]

@ irooni and yes tahreef al Quraan is a Shia belief. The prominent Shia figure Altubrusi wrote a book titled "The final verdict on confirming the alteration of the book of the Lord of Lords" Not one Shia spoke up to say he's not Muslim or even condemn him because he's too big of a figure and they'd destroy their religion by doing that. So instead, they reply as you did "You say Allah moves up and down! and that the prophet urinated standing up!" Its a low level of arguing.

[SunniPureIslam]

@ irooni I left a few of your posts only so that people can see your real beliefs without taqiyyah, which according to AlKhoui is permissible even in debates with Sunnis. This is why historically Shiasm is based on lies. & is why Khums money is collected by scholars on behalf of a hidden Imam based on lies. Al Tijani and other Shia "scholars" would even LIE and say this is in Bukhari while it doesn't exist. You in a post I left even accuse Al Hasan of Taqiyah! The NEED to lie is self explanatory

[SunniPureIslam]

@ irooni , usually people upon truth, don't use foul language because they can get their ideas across without insults and flooding pages with lies and unverified info + flawed logic. If you think you are able to discuss narrations and knowledge of authenticity of hadeeths you copy and paste. But since your scholars are like the one in the video, I don't think you will do anything other than insult and copy and paste. Because only in "messes", political or academic, does Shia thought find a place

[SunniPureIslam]

@ artis barak Allah feek, I mixed between names in previous replies so my apology :)

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 Al Tabari documented each and everything he got his hands at, and the reason was to preserve the knowledge that was present there. This point of 6 years old is already refuted, with clear evidence, as per knowledge of ilmul Hadith. Each and everyone has their own Emaan, and answerable for their own actions and beliefs! Such and more severe attacks had been happening even in the lifetime of Nabi(saw)! Allah is Hayye!

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 Yes, She(ra) is the mother of believers only! Allah(swt) has decided the matter already!

[33:6] The prophet is closer to the believers than they are to each other, and his wives are like mothers to them. The relatives ought to take care of one another in accordance with GOD's scripture. Thus, the believers shall take care of their relatives who immigrate to them, provided they have taken care of their own families first. These are commandments of this scripture.

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 Read the story of the wives of Ibrahim(as), and you'd find something of great extreme among the wives(as)! So, Allah(swt) is wrong according to the shia theology?

[irooni100]

@artis

Q 64;1- (3) If ye two turn in repentance to Him, your hearts are indeed so inclined; but if ye back up each other against him, truly Allah is his Protector, and Gabriel, and (every) righteous one among those who believe― and furthermore, the angels will back (him) up.

WHO IS ALLAH TALKING ABOUT ?

AYISHA & HAFSA,YOUR MONAFIQ MOTHERS ! 

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 There must be a shia narrator in the chain of the narrators of this quotations, since the context is known by Sheikh ul Hadiths, but I'm 1000% sure of it!

So, Allah is wrong, thats what you are trying to say? :) Abdullah bin Ubai and his brothers like u are the true muslims, if I agree with you! Nabi(saw) lived with her(ra) to his last, another proof!

The first wife(as) of Ibrahim(as) was jealous of the second! W8 for the grave!

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 [33:6] The prophet is closer to the believers than they are to each other, and his wives are like mothers to them. The relatives ought to take care of one another in accordance with GOD's scripture. Thus, the believers shall take care of their relatives who immigrate to them, provided they have taken care of their own families first. These are commandments of this scripture.

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 1) The Imams of Hadith said that any Hadith comes after Qur'an in status. 2) Every Hadith is authentic as long as something based on ilm ul Hadith comes against it. 3) Sahih doesn't mean that its 1000% authentic but that its chain of narrators is authentic ie Narrators did narrate it. 4) When Allah decides a matter and someone else comes to give his/her verdict on it, is his own business, and those who follow it are murtadeen, who believe that they are better judges than Allah(swt).

[SunniPureIslam]

@artistdigital If he wanted detailed discussion about every single chain, person, and narration, theres plenty of forums to discuss. I can invite him to a few, as things he mentioned were discussed many times, and they all suddenly disappear because their knowledge of hadeeth is like the one in the video. (cont)

[SunniPureIslam]

@artistdigital So he will dare to enter such a discussion because as said earlier they want to just copy and paste 10 different things/lies + some false logic, and not discuss anything. Its ironic their scholars on live TV say Quran is corrupt but they ignore them and attack Sunnis This is due to the hatred built up in their Hussaniyyat, making emotion control everything, blocking any logic or common sense. Otherwise they'd have to consider their scholars non Muslim for what they say on TV.

[artistdigital]

@SunniPureIslam I too can discuss each and every point he raised, and I have been doing it, but I have found that they know it yet they deny/hide it. I have discoursed with this guy before in great detail. This time I have made it much simple. Its a clear verse of Qur'an against which they bring their own logic based on their own hatred. I believe that the cursing which is a part of their is emaan from their scholars who have been trying to deviate attention from shia involvement in fitnas.

[SunniPureIslam]

@artistdigital Barak Allah feek. Its amazing how emotions of hatred spread in Husaniyyat can block some peoples logic. They accuse the closest companions of the prophet, his wives, and even Salah Aldeen who historians from all religions respect, yet when their scholars on TV say the Quran is corrupt, give us chums money that belongs to the "hidden" Imam who entered a cave 1000 years ago until he returns, and that Imams control the universe, including the Bermida triangle, they don't accuse them!

[artistdigital]

@SunniPureIslam Lets ask him a simple question, "Whether Nabi(saw) was Ummi or not?" See what he answers! :) We can also discuss "Al-Tawabun" with him, their origin and their traditions, but its just wastage of time, instead we should work on our own zuhd, zikr and taqwaa, because thats what matters!

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 1) You aren't Allah that you would know who repents and who don't. Worry about your own self. You are Abdullah bin Ubai, and there is something that Allah(swt) said to you in the Quran that you should read. Conversation is over from my side. You reject the Qur'an by going against clear verdict of Allah(swt), and use logical fallacies to prove your point, the trait of classical munafiqeen.

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 [33:6] The prophet is closer to the believers than they are to each other, and his wives are like mothers to them. The relatives ought to take care of one another in accordance with GOD's scripture. Thus, the believers shall take care of their relatives who immigrate to them, provided they have taken care of their own families first. >>>>These are commandments of this scripture.<<<<

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 Tahreef of Quran is a Shia ideology, and if you check the chain of narrators, there must be a shia sitting in there, just as you'd find shia in the core of each and every fitna in the Islamic history. Now who believed and who disbelieved is not you to decide. The words of Allah are very clear and explicit in deciding the matter. The verdict is "Mother of the believers".

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 Why should anyone try to explain a thing to you? You need to learn to respect the mother of believers first, and then speak of anything else. Even Abdullah bin Ubai would have used to obey his mother? Did he? If he did, you should learn something good from him as well! :)

[irooni100]

@arti

PLEASE TRY TO TEACH ME ,IF YOU KNOW SOME THING HERE !

THE QURAN 113

1. Say: "I seek refuge with (Allah) the Lord of the daybreak,

2. "From the evil of what He has created;

3. "And from the evil of the darkening (night) as it comes with its darkness;(or the moon as it sets or goes away).

4. "And from the evil of the witchcrafts when they blow in the knots,

5. "And from the evil of the envier when he envies."( THIS IS WHAT THE JEALOUS IS ,MY FRIEND )

AND ALLAH SAYS IT IS EVIL! AYISHA WAS ONE

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 The Prophet is closer to the believers than their ownselves, and his wives are their (believers') mothers. Quran 6:66

Above is decree of Allah(swt), whereas, the application of your quoted verse is your own thinking, belief and mentality. Now, the verse is very clear, it says "mother of believers", not Murtadeen o Munafiqeen! :)

You have a lot more to say Naozobillah on! :)

[artistdigital]

- Amir Al-Mumineen Ali (RA) said: “If I examined my supporters I would not find any who are sincere. If I were to test them I would find them that they are nothing but apostates, and if I were to check them I would find that one in a thousand is sincere” [Al-Kaafi, Al-Rawdah, 8/338]

More stuff will come back, if you reply to my comment! :)

[SunniPureIslam]

@artistdigital First of all, we dont recognize Al Kafi. But yes, those who claimed to be Alis Shias werent sincere. Same with Al Hussain whos killers were : 1- Ubaidullah Bin Ziyad, he was in Alis army in Siffeen battle, so he was a Shia. His father also was made ruler of Al Basrah, by Ali raa.2- Shamr Bin Dhi Al Jawshan, also in Alis army in Siffeen. They are both in Shia source "Rijaal Al Shia" (Shia men). 3- Sinan Ibn Anas Al Nakh'i, his father was also a Shia in Alis army in Siffeen.

[SunniPureIslam]

@artistdigital Also please see the video ( in the channel) "Who killed Al Hussain", it shows how they viewed their supporters, and what they did to them.

[artistdigital]

@SunniPureIslam Shmr was also in jamal! I have dig deep into shiaism. Who accused Umul Momineen(ra)? He was a declared munafiq, and who accuse her(ra) today? What does it make them? :)

[haditqura]

@artistdigital what can you say, shia will always do wrong thing, they are fake! its all baseless theology and wrong! Shias have to get their brain excamined! they betrayed ali, and they wont admit it!

If this is what the teach, then no wonder they make all their mistakes!

Allah will judge them on judgement day!

[12hamida]

once again sunni sheiks makes shia scholors look bad they use baseless theology and info they try to luse sunni books against them but it always backfires on them cause of there stupidity Shia keep up your good work and keep embarrising yourself more and more of you become sunni by the day

[hanysal]

What a A Stupid Shia this is, If the scholars are dumb then what do you expect from the Shi'ite laymen?

Shi'ite=Shit

[TheStudentOfAllah]

@hanysal please do not go around calling names. It does not suit you as a muslim. Probably, having had the same life experience as a shia, you would be a shia. If you dont believe in their system, to you is your system, to them is their system. Islam teaches us tolerance. Not slandering each other. With that said, may Allah guide you to success. PEACE

[shukhayeh]

@hanysal

did you know that the word shia is also used in the quran?

[SunniPureIslam]

@shukhayeh So what? the word Satan (Iblees) is also used in the Qur'aan. Besides, the word Shia in the Quran is the linguistic meaning and has nothing to do with the invented sect that revolves around emotions, Khums money, Mut'ah, and Taqiyyah.

[shukhayeh]

@SunniPureIslam

ino it doesnt have nothing to do with it , but im just saying its used in the quran and he made a foul comment . if he wanted to do a foul comment about the sect right the full name of the sect.

and i love how your username is SunniPureIslam but youve been useing foul language .

just to show sunni islam are very respectful.

[SunniPureIslam]

@shukhayeh Im not sure which comment you're referring to as I replied to yours as a general statement, since its always brought up. Also,maybe you mixed between me and someone else because I dont use foul language as a matter of principle, and here it was used against me, not the other way around. I wasnt been raised in environments of cursing like the ones in Hussainiyat of Shias. To see foul language of Shia scholars and not just some people on the net please see PiV3yGwiVek

[datvsbling]

@hanysal The biggest threat to Islam is Wahhabi Murderers that kill women and children, The biggest threat to Islam is Wahhabi Kufar of Saudi Arabia that ally Israel to kill other Muslim. The biggest threat to Islam is the Wahhabi kufar murderers that are allies of Israel the apartheid state ethnically cleansing your Muslim Palestinian brothers, Your prince Bandar Saud went to Israel and afford to pay Israel 500 million to attack the resistance of Lebanon Wahhabi are the Kuffar.

[hanysal]

LMAO!

Some scholars they have!

[irooni100]

@hanysal

Certainly the MOST STUPID SHIA is far smarter than the BEST Of the Sunni Scholars,Because That Stupid Shia At least made THE RIGHT CHOICE When he became a Shia ! yet that Sunni high scholar remind loyal to those CRIMINALS Who took the Islam in opposite direction to what was assigned by ALLAH & HIS RASUL(SAWA) !

[SunniPureIslam]

@irooni100 Killers of Al Hussain are : 1- Ubaidullah Bin Ziyad, he was in Alis army in Siffeen battle, so he was a Shia. His father also was made ruler of Al Basrah, by Ali raa. 2- Shamr Bin Dhi Al Jawshan, also in Alis army in Siffeen. They are both in Shia source "Rijaal Al Shia" (Shia men). 3- Sinan Ibn Anas Al Nakh'i, his father was also a Shia in Alis army in Siffeen. That said, Al Hasan pledged alliegence to Muawiyah raa. And according to you hes infallible. No way out of it my friend.

[irooni100]

@Su

I Know how your teachers have LIED to u about these men,But Let us say what you wrote to be true.Well Abu Baker & umar according to you they were the best of the Sahabah of Rasulallah (SAWA).yet after his death they went on their own way,disobeying Allah &Rasulallah(sawa).So you just shot yourself in the leg with your own arrow my friend. & as your Umol mouminin Ayisha said;MOST Arabs became KAFIR After the death of rasulallah(SAWA).

but those who killed Imam Husain were YAZIDIS not SHIA !

[SunniPureIslam]

@irooni100 Its in your books "Shia men" , and your scholars like Murdadha Al Mutahiri and many, many others say so. If dont know what your Shia scholars say about Shias killing Al Hussain. Here, watch a few of them talk about it. youtube.com/watch?v=6zWx6lID2M­Q . The killers were in Alis army, and their fathers were appointed by Ali raa. But they betrayed in the most awful ways.

[haditqura]

@irooni100 yazdis, they where shia if i remember...

[irooni100]

@iPurekafir

IMAM HASAN(AS) HAD TO DO TAQIYAH TO AVOID GETTING HIS SMALL MUSLIM UMMAH LEFT FROM GETTING KILLED, JUST AS HIS FATHER DID & HIS GRAND FATHER DID WHEN HE FOUND OUT THAT THE ENEMY WAS MUCH STRONGER THAN HE WAS.

BUT STUPID IDIOTS LIKE YOU WILL NEVER LEARN THE TRUTH ,EVEN IF THEY SHOVE IT IN YOUR REAR END WITH A NUCLEAR MISSILE ! 

[SunniPureIslam]

@irooni100 So you accuse me of being a kafir, and accuse Imam Al Hasan who you believe to be infallible, of practicing deception, and being a coward and pledging alliegence to one of the worst enemies of Islam (in your belief) instead of speaking the truth even if it costed his life. Nice respect you have there for Ahl Al bait. Despite your foul language, ill leave this post so that people can read it.

[irooni100]

@SunniPureIslam

YOU MORON DO NOT EVEN KNOW WHAT TAQIYYAH IS ! I LET YOU LIVE WITH YOUR IGNORANCE !

[SunniPureIslam]

@irooni100 Taqiyyah is to be done with those you feel safe with, so that it becomes a trait of yours when you meet those you beware. Thats what your top scholars say. Like Amaal Al Toosi 1/199 , Wasaail Al Shia 11/466, and Bihar Al Anwar 395/75. Also "Al Khoui" ON HIS WEBSITE says its permissible to use taqiyyah when debating. Finally, yes, I removed your posts, so let it be known. The reason is that every single one of them contains insults, curses, calling who you discuss with kafir etc

[irooni100]

@SunniPureIslam

AS I SAID YOU ARE IGNORANT WAHABI & YOU WILL GO TO JAHANNAM WITH ABU MAKKAR & UMAR & UTHMAN .INSHA ALLAH .

LET IT BE KNOW I TOLD YOU SO,THIS DAY NOV.2,2011 !

[artistdigital]

@irooni100 Who will go to jahanam and who to Jannah isn't for you to decide. You can't give your verdict in this matter as well. So, its like you said nothing except earning for your own grave! Such verdict is coming from a person who is the rejector of a clear Ayah from Allah(swt)! :)

[LeftShia4good]

@irooni100

POORsian boy, take your persian cult (rafidi shiism) to your country of nosejobs. And if u wanna know what taqiyyah is, visit my channel.

[AlJelmoodAlshi3i]

@SunniPureIslam ok lesson u stupid bakri ur the alst one who talk about cowardness imam hassan was a million times braver then any of the sissy caliphate spicially omar who fled from uhud imam hassan had no choice evryone btrayed him at that time and he was to brave to take that choice if u talk about imam hassan giving allegience to muiwya LA prophet mohammad pbuh paied allegince in hudybya because he had no other choice but that imam hassan was the one who saved islam by this decesion

[AlJelmoodAlshi3i]

@SunniPureIslam if he didnt pay allegince to muiwya then all the shia and imam hassan and imam hussein would have gotten killed and no one was lift to save islam and the quran you bakris never understand that u are always ignorents and nasibis to understand that i called nasibi because u called imam hassan coward with no proof lets see how will u answer the prophet about what u called his son

[salahudin720]

@irooni100

And we meet again! Did Imam Hassan (ra) give bayah to Muawiyah due to his infallibility, ismah, or out of free-will? Infallibility or free-will, which caused Imam Hassan (ra) to give bayah to Muawiyah? Answer that and your madhab will be shredded to pieces. You have the floor!

[SunniPureIslam]

@salahudin720 He answered that (in this video or another one in the channel) and actually said that Al Hasan was practicing Taqiyyah! That answer in itself destroys the basis of their religion altogether because Al Hasan is supposed to be infallible and ordered by God to establish imammate, yet pledged alliegence to an enemy of Islam instead! Saying it was Taqiyyah only makes it worse and is accusing Al Hasan of being a coward and a liar. These guys need to put emotions aside and start reading.

[salahudin720]

@SunniPureIslam

He did? hahahaha, this Irooni100 is a clown. All he does is copy-paste the same material under videos and use caps-lock as though that makes his lies more believable. His scholars are so pathetic that after being exposed for lying upon mainstream Muslims, they don't even have the audacity and decency to apologize citing their lack of knowledge as the reason for their slip.

[ahmad3043]

@salahudin720 you didn't brink anything new brother , everybody know shia are big liar

[sillyshiite]

Lmaoo every single shia i ever argued with has the same way of debating, they base everything on false information but the main reason for that is that its a relgion thats not based on following prophet muhammad and the quran like us muslims, rather so called schollars that where falsly educated by lies and they believed it, and thats why their faith is weak LOOOL hilariouse thought their monafiqs

[irooni100]

@sillyshiite

You have not MET a real Shia ,my friend .

So Now you say you follow the QURAN & THE PROPHET(SAWA) Unlike Shias ?

Can you prove this ??

[zelem92]

lol@the end part

[SaifYazeed]

LOL! pathetic. :D