Wikipedia??LOL That's your source. Please go to the references at the bottom and send me the link of your source.
The CDC, TIMES, 60 minutes, etc all confirm Gaëtan Dugas as patient zero a flaming homo, with interviews of his flings before they died and doctor reports, and hospital records recording all the early homosexuals, ALL THIS EVIDENCE, but you say its been debunked. Wiki is right to a point, you failed to realize the early AIDS patients were all HOMOSEXUALS. They started the spread
WHO GIVES A FUCK YOU RETARD! you're just emphasizing the point that you hate gay people. You haven't argued ANYTHING. you're caveman brain still hasn't taken ANYTHING in about how HIV actually works has it?
@DarkKnightBob1o1 LoL! i didn't say how it works. I said its documented the homosexuals were the first recorded to ever have AIDS in North America. They were warn numerous times to stop spreading it but because they felt like they weren't getting the political funding for a cure they purposely spread it. They have documentation and video of this. I know how AIDS is spread, but the gays were the first to have it and spread. So don't say "WHO GIVES A FUCK" After calling it a conspiracy.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 "hate gay people?" Thats what homosexuals do. When you point out facts they call you a homophobe, bigot, or I hate gays. I never once said I hate gays. Go back to all my post. I never said anything of the sort. Nice try though. You fail to see your "Gay equal rights" issue isn't as cut and dry as you want everybody to believe. We still don't know what causes it, how some can change to straight, or long term effect of mass gay life styles? Theres still so much we need to know.
you're a bigoted fuck and you're too dumb to even realise it.
" They were warn numerous times to stop spreading it but because they felt like they weren't getting the political funding for a cure they purposely spread it."
Are you fucking kidding me? Take your gorilla brain back to school fool.
Your obvious homophobia is as transparent as glass and frankly it's kinda irrelevant at this point how you try to rationalise your way out of it.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Dude theres video of them confirming it out of there own mouths. Patient zero spread it on purpose. Its a fact. A number of them were told what it was and they still continued to have gay sex. What proof do you want me to send you? If you unlock your PM I can send you anything you want. Is that why you lock it? To hide from the truth and brush off anything you don't like as bigotry or homophobia?
@DarkKnightBob1o1 What causes heterosexuality is biological and natural order of our species.Like all living things.The will to reproduce and survive.
Woman have the biological need to barre children and men have the biological need to release there seed.This is done on purpose to continue the species from dieing out.The problem is gays for some reason are wired different and don't follow the laws of simple nature and survival. Its really selfish when you think about it.
@Jahkillian what's most embarrasing is that you genuinely come across as someone who thinks they're right and wants to engage in a serious debate about this.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 I wasn't answering your question on evolution or marriage,it was a simple question on what makes people hetro.In the word space I have, i made it as simple as possible for you to understand.If you don't know the whole sperm and egg, reproduce, survival thing,thats not my problem. If you notice, all you do is call names, lock your account in the dark, and say how wrong I 'am but never once said WHY IT WAS WRONG.
Do you really think the purpose of sperm was to go in a asshole?
@Jahkillian hopefully we can come round and fuck your arse when you realise you've been gay all along.
Keep trying to 'fight the good fight' intrying to convince people there's some kind of difference in principle between gay rights and black rights.
I'm sure when someones stomping all over yours and they say "yeah well you're not REALLY justified in complaining I mean it's not really the same as black issues" lol
Seriously. You're an ignorant human being incapable of being educated.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 The difference is blacks were fighting for what every body else had to be able to marry any woman. Gays want what nobody has, to marry the same gender. I don't have that right, nobody has that right. So what you're fighting for is special rights for gays. Its like saying blacks should get paid more then everybody else because they were slaves and have high unemployment rate.
IT WOULD DISCRIMINATION IF THE LAW SAID YOU CAN'T MARRY A WOMAN LIKE THE REST OF US MALES.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Theres no such thing as gay marriage. THIS WAS MADE UP! Its not as if gays were getting married for the last 50 years and the government just took it away.
We don't have black , jew, or even interracial marriage, but now gays made up GAY MARRIAGE. Theres no such thing. So you as a gay were never GIVEN those rights for them to be taken away.
And you can try to spin the facts by saying "You hate gays" even though I have never once stated that.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 No its not labeled "interracial marriage" Its just "marriage" The definition never changed when blacks could marry whites. See when you use "water fountains" as a example it shows how good gays have it today. Gays have never been put in that situation. They were always allowed to ride and the back of the bus, use any washroom, fountain, work anywhere they want, etc. All the things black civil rights were, gays already have. So you made my point for me.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 The only way to no if some one is gay is if they tell you. To bad, blacks and others can't play the Jekyll and Hyde game.
So what if they're called Fag. Theres a negative word for everybody.
They did spread aids in North America, what evidence do you need? I'll give it to you. Its documented, recorded fact. We even have the first AID victims in NA. They were all Homosexuals. Later the majority was homos.
Being beaten... Thats never happened to anybody else? Only Gays?LOL
we do have interracial marriage. We just don't see the difference.
your bigotry is showing yet again.
You don't need to say you hate gay people just like a womaniser doesn't need to say he hates women or that when a KKK has to beat a balck dude to tell us hes racist.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 do I really need to explain the difference from a sexual act or feeling to the color of some ones skin? LOL You really can't see the difference?
Compare race to other races, and sexual acts and feelings to other sexual acts and feelings. How in any way can you compare black and gay?
um I just did dude. what is the difference, you tell me. I would LOVE to hear how the arguments FOR racism are in ANY way different from the ones for homophobia. or even womens rights.
I mean let's be honest dude blacks are just genetically inferior and it's clear that they have less of a right to the refined rights that us white people do.
chances are you're completely missing the point by conflating the wrong arguements.
Again i would love to see the difference in logical structure.
@Jahkillian hint the arguments AGAINST racism are constructed to involve the idea that the colour of ones skin makes NO difference to the rights and capabilities of the person.
By all means try to justify your position, you won't be able to do it.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 I don't understand how that has anything to do with blacks fighting for "BASIC" civil rights,(the same rights gays already have) To gays wanting to remove gender. You can't even compare the two, and it pisses a lot of blacks off.
mabye the black people you're talking about are like the one in the video. i.e. bigoted. And as hard as it may be for your mind to grasp, no i'm not racist. talking about the issue objectively does not equate to racism.
No-ones removing gender They are removing the block on equal rights as human beings
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Your throwing out the word "Equal Rights" way to easy with out fully understanding it. Its not equal rights because you say so. Gays have the right to vote, work, live anywhere they want, etc All the basic rights as every one else. You can't say "my house is smaller then yours, I want a bigger house" Equal Rights. Or we should all get paid the same. Equal rights. We already have equal rights. You literally want to ad "extra rights" for gays. Do you know what bigot means?
That's like the classic utilitarian argument for if there's ever a justifiable cause for rape.
2 brothers having sex is not morally wrong though it is perhaps viewed by society as something not recommended a: that's not strictly about them being gay and b: them having sex is irrelevant to the argument as to whether they wanted to get married.
lol would you be against a brother an sister being being married? woo yeah flip and reverse it!
@DarkKnightBob1o1 I wasn't making a argument, never said anything about morals, or rape. I was just asking a simple yes or no question. Which im not sure you even did? So you'd support them and be for them getting married? A simple yes or no is ok.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 No i wouldn't support brother and sister or any family members getting married. I'm apposed to even cousins getting married. My point is this, you yell EQUAL RIGHTS, but really don't know what it means, just use it for your cause. Equal rights to me would mean, 2 sisters, 2 brothers, Uncle and niece, man with multiple wives, wife with multiple husbands, etc and anything else were 2 or more adults would want to get married.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Well answer it and educate me. You want people to understand gays but when we ask questions, you get offended and use your safe word , bigot or homophobe.
If you're for EQUAL RIGHTS why aren't you for 2 brothers getting married? You sound like a bigot, that you would be happy with your rights but not somebody else s. Whats the difference? You're now starting to sound like a bigot. :)
umm no I don't want YOU to understand gays because the simple fact is it requires THOUGHT on your part, stop trying to rationalise your idiocy.
Why would I want to educate you dude you don't even realise you lost the argument about 5 comments down. Now sit down and stfu.
I said I wouldn't support them I never said it wasn't there legal right not to other than I provisionally issued a caveat on the grounds that inter family marriage might not be classed as legally justifiable
@DarkKnightBob1o1 i am thinking for my self. Nature doesn't even recognize 2 of the same sex. It rejects it with no reward. They can't reproduce. The fact that homosexuals haven't died out, proves its not genetic or natural. THEY CANT REPRODUCE! Nature says "SCIENTIFICALLY" you want to do that, I'm not helping or condoning it!. You wont get any help from me. NOTHING! If anything from history, nature tried everything to stop it. hiv, AIDs, buts that another argument.
some women can't reproduce, does that mean it's wrong to allow them to adopt, have fertility treatments or for another woman to grow their baby inside her womb?
Come back to class when you're over the age of 15 dude.
What's interesting is that HIV neither targets gay or straight people. If it did there would be a genetic precursor precluding one genetic pool form the other.
Given that both gay and straight people contract the disease you don't have a leg to stand on for your argument.
Both gay and straight people engage in anal sex so you have no argument.
The simple fact is it selects people via blood transfusion. A straight man can give a gay man hiv by injecting him by mistake.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 You said you wouldn't support 2 brothers that wanted to get married, the same way some people wouldn't support gay marriage. You call them bigots, but your doing the same thing.
I can tell you know the truth by the way you answer and name calling. PATIENT ZERO WAS A HOMO! He s been interviewed many times, he purposely spread AIDs even after knowing he had it. Other homos new they had it and continued to spreed it. 1000s of gays had Aids before any hetros.But you know this.
there is no evidence for patient zero being homo or even existing as you stated. and even if it was like I SAID (see what I mean about you not telling to truth when talking about learning?) it wouldn't MATTER if he was gay or not. AIDs is not spread by people because they're gay.
you're taking urban legends and spouting them as fact.
Go to africa. there are plenty of heterosexual males spreading HV
Your complete ignorance of the disease demonstrates why you're so easily swayed by homophobia.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 I can't debate with you any further. To deny patient zero is the stupidest thing i've heard. This is why you should unlock your account , so you can get all the information. Heres a a random Youtube video of patient zero and homos spreading the AIDS virus. watch?v=EsUMFPvZ6w0
Is well documented who patient zero is and that he was a homosexual. The first record of AIDS/HIV in North America was from gay males. This is well documented information, which would take you 1 sec.
"" The occurrence of pneumocystosis in these 5 previously healthy individuals without a clinically apparent underlying immunodeficiency is unusual. The fact that these patients were all HOMOSEXUAL suggests an association between some aspect of a homosexual lifestyle or disease acquired through sexual contact and Pneumocystis pneumonia in this population. """""
The first recorded AID patients in North America were homosexual.
fuck the 2 brothers situation I happily retract that statement and since state that as marriage is LEGALLY defined as
"the legal or religious ceremony that formalizes the decision of two people to live as a married couple, including the accompanying social festivities"
Thus you can happily swivel. Any 2 people can get married if they want to.
Like I said I have no issue with the morality AT ALL (but you're too deaf/blind to understand basic english) I wa just unsure about the legal defin.
@DarkKnightBob1o1 you should unlock your account so your not just feeding information you want to hear, but get all sides and opinions. Thats how you learn.
You're doing what extreme religious do. You're saying "My way and only MY way, I don't care if its right or wrong" The most intelligent accounts keep the info pipe line wide open. They're collecting information. Like I was trying to do with you.
@Jahkillian umm no. common sense says that doing so just invies spam and hatemail. No thanks if you want to say something you can do so on the channel where freedom of speech is not a right because it's my site.
You were trying to do nothing of the sort, you know perfectly well that's a lie and I ain't falling for it.
umm I find it strange you're trying to accuse me of bigotry when it's you who are categorically denying an entire gender set in order to prove your point
Again you openly state you think blacks can have equal rights but gay people can't get married. Yet you don't even give a reason..
Let's be honest you just don't like the idea.
and as for the brothers thing considering i'm pretty much al for almost everything here it's hardly what I would qualitatively call a bigot.
Bigotry is so sad. What's even sadder is people that don't realize they're bigots. This minister is an example! Gay marriage is a civil rights issue, period. If you don't agree with it, too bad. You don't get to decide whether I deserve to have the same rights as everyone else.
the fact that this is even a question is SOOOO PATHETIC!!! it tears our CONSTITUTION in half, thats all that matters...debate ended, nothing else to talk about...basically it comes down to the smart few vs the stupid many...im glad im not gay cause i would be getting furious
How can a black man, after all the years of persecution and quite recent civil rights revolution, turn around and strip gay people of equal rights? Hypocrite much?
Our government is not a democracy and for good reason. Pure democracy fails because it squashes minorities. It doesn't matter what you (or 99.99% of the country) think, everyone it supposed to have equal rights under our republic government.
@rafaravioli Black persecution and suposed gay discrimination are very different. Don't make such a stupid, ignorant statement as to claim just b/c he is black he should be for gay rights.
Our courts are there to give equal and impartial justice. Why are you going to punish people for doing what is legally right. They are there to uphold our constitution not your bible. If churches start getting involved in polictics and start meddling in court matters maybe courts should start meddling in chuch affairs. Seperation of chuch and state. I have freedom of religion and your violating my rights by imposing your beliefs on me!!! Our government CANNOT BEND TO THE WILL OF ANY RELIGION.
I'm a black lesbian. The black guy is a BIGOT!!!!
phoenixbrew 10 months ago
Bishop Jackson represents the worst of religious bigotry. It is apparent to me that
a good portion of heterosexuals draw their sense of personal power by diminsihing
the lives of homosexual people. So much so that some of them consider it to be
fun because it makes them feel powerful . This is at least one reason why (the
unstated reason) why the are so obstinate.
Pilgrim812 1 year ago
Wikipedia??LOL That's your source. Please go to the references at the bottom and send me the link of your source.
The CDC, TIMES, 60 minutes, etc all confirm Gaëtan Dugas as patient zero a flaming homo, with interviews of his flings before they died and doctor reports, and hospital records recording all the early homosexuals, ALL THIS EVIDENCE, but you say its been debunked. Wiki is right to a point, you failed to realize the early AIDS patients were all HOMOSEXUALS. They started the spread
Jahkillian 1 year ago
@Jahkillian woo 60 minutes.
WHO GIVES A FUCK YOU RETARD! you're just emphasizing the point that you hate gay people. You haven't argued ANYTHING. you're caveman brain still hasn't taken ANYTHING in about how HIV actually works has it?
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 LoL! i didn't say how it works. I said its documented the homosexuals were the first recorded to ever have AIDS in North America. They were warn numerous times to stop spreading it but because they felt like they weren't getting the political funding for a cure they purposely spread it. They have documentation and video of this. I know how AIDS is spread, but the gays were the first to have it and spread. So don't say "WHO GIVES A FUCK" After calling it a conspiracy.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
No I said you don't know how it works.
retard
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 "hate gay people?" Thats what homosexuals do. When you point out facts they call you a homophobe, bigot, or I hate gays. I never once said I hate gays. Go back to all my post. I never said anything of the sort. Nice try though. You fail to see your "Gay equal rights" issue isn't as cut and dry as you want everybody to believe. We still don't know what causes it, how some can change to straight, or long term effect of mass gay life styles? Theres still so much we need to know.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
Umm so tell me what 'causes' heterosexuality?
you're a bigoted fuck and you're too dumb to even realise it.
" They were warn numerous times to stop spreading it but because they felt like they weren't getting the political funding for a cure they purposely spread it."
Are you fucking kidding me? Take your gorilla brain back to school fool.
Your obvious homophobia is as transparent as glass and frankly it's kinda irrelevant at this point how you try to rationalise your way out of it.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Dude theres video of them confirming it out of there own mouths. Patient zero spread it on purpose. Its a fact. A number of them were told what it was and they still continued to have gay sex. What proof do you want me to send you? If you unlock your PM I can send you anything you want. Is that why you lock it? To hide from the truth and brush off anything you don't like as bigotry or homophobia?
Jahkillian 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 What causes heterosexuality is biological and natural order of our species.Like all living things.The will to reproduce and survive.
Woman have the biological need to barre children and men have the biological need to release there seed.This is done on purpose to continue the species from dieing out.The problem is gays for some reason are wired different and don't follow the laws of simple nature and survival. Its really selfish when you think about it.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
and yet this has nothing to do with the right to marry.
The definition of marriage has nothing to do with the conjugal role of the partner
And your knowledge of evolution is fucking pathetic.
You certainly no dawkins or david attenbourgh thats for sure.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@Jahkillian what's most embarrasing is that you genuinely come across as someone who thinks they're right and wants to engage in a serious debate about this.
And yet you're demonstrating complete fail.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 I wasn't answering your question on evolution or marriage,it was a simple question on what makes people hetro.In the word space I have, i made it as simple as possible for you to understand.If you don't know the whole sperm and egg, reproduce, survival thing,thats not my problem. If you notice, all you do is call names, lock your account in the dark, and say how wrong I 'am but never once said WHY IT WAS WRONG.
Do you really think the purpose of sperm was to go in a asshole?
Jahkillian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"I wasn't answering your question on evolution or marriage"
Yeheah. Thanks for stating my obvious point.
do you really think the purpose was to go in the mouth?
Naturalistic fallacy dumbass.
I have no intention of unlocking my account.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
Comment removed
Jahkillian 1 year ago
@Jahkillian hopefully we can come round and fuck your arse when you realise you've been gay all along.
Keep trying to 'fight the good fight' intrying to convince people there's some kind of difference in principle between gay rights and black rights.
I'm sure when someones stomping all over yours and they say "yeah well you're not REALLY justified in complaining I mean it's not really the same as black issues" lol
Seriously. You're an ignorant human being incapable of being educated.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 The difference is blacks were fighting for what every body else had to be able to marry any woman. Gays want what nobody has, to marry the same gender. I don't have that right, nobody has that right. So what you're fighting for is special rights for gays. Its like saying blacks should get paid more then everybody else because they were slaves and have high unemployment rate.
IT WOULD DISCRIMINATION IF THE LAW SAID YOU CAN'T MARRY A WOMAN LIKE THE REST OF US MALES.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
" I don't have that right"
Because you're not gay dumbass. Lesbians CAN'T marry women you fuckwit! What you're saying IS ALREADY TRUE.
Jesus caveman brain at 9 o'clock.
Again you just hate gay people and are unfortunately my freind a complete idiot who cannot even see it.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@Jahkillian it's nothing like blacks should be paid more.
It is only your prejudice that makes you think that gay marriage is any different from straight marriage.
The more you talk the more embarrassing you make your own position.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Theres no such thing as gay marriage. THIS WAS MADE UP! Its not as if gays were getting married for the last 50 years and the government just took it away.
We don't have black , jew, or even interracial marriage, but now gays made up GAY MARRIAGE. Theres no such thing. So you as a gay were never GIVEN those rights for them to be taken away.
And you can try to spin the facts by saying "You hate gays" even though I have never once stated that.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
There's no such thing as straight marriage. It was made up.
It's not as if black people were using the same water fountains for the last 50 years and the government just took it away.
"We don't have interracial marriage"
WTF I knew you were fucking pig ignorant but do you live under a caveman rock or something?
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 No its not labeled "interracial marriage" Its just "marriage" The definition never changed when blacks could marry whites. See when you use "water fountains" as a example it shows how good gays have it today. Gays have never been put in that situation. They were always allowed to ride and the back of the bus, use any washroom, fountain, work anywhere they want, etc. All the things black civil rights were, gays already have. So you made my point for me.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
uh yeah cos that's how histrioy worked out wasnt it.
They only had to put up with people treating them like shit calling themfag acussing them of spreading AIDs
Being beaten to death by vigilante mobs.They sure have it great dont they
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 The only way to no if some one is gay is if they tell you. To bad, blacks and others can't play the Jekyll and Hyde game.
So what if they're called Fag. Theres a negative word for everybody.
They did spread aids in North America, what evidence do you need? I'll give it to you. Its documented, recorded fact. We even have the first AID victims in NA. They were all Homosexuals. Later the majority was homos.
Being beaten... Thats never happened to anybody else? Only Gays?LOL
Jahkillian 1 year ago
I think having a guy fuck you in the arse is a good sign moron.
Yeah cos everyone deserves to be beaten equally.
Fcukwit
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
we do have interracial marriage. We just don't see the difference.
your bigotry is showing yet again.
You don't need to say you hate gay people just like a womaniser doesn't need to say he hates women or that when a KKK has to beat a balck dude to tell us hes racist.
Hint i'mnot even gay lol.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
"Gays want what nobody has, to marry the same gender. "
We call this a double standard.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
blacks should get EQUAL pay. just like women should get equal pay you fuckwit.
How many times do you need it explained before you mcjob training kicks in
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 help me to understand. Why all of a sudden do gays feel the need to get married or even want to?
Jahkillian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
see I told you you were ignorant
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@Jahkillian I actually pity people like you
"why do the bad men come in the night daddy"
Go look up westboro baptist. They don't understand either.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
look up a video by theoreticalbullshit on proposition 8.
Enjoy being schooled on your ignorance.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
for your glorious master plan from on high no doubt.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
take Rev. Lynns arguement and replace gay people with black people.
See how quickly he changes his mind
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 do I really need to explain the difference from a sexual act or feeling to the color of some ones skin? LOL You really can't see the difference?
Compare race to other races, and sexual acts and feelings to other sexual acts and feelings. How in any way can you compare black and gay?
Jahkillian 1 year ago
um I just did dude. what is the difference, you tell me. I would LOVE to hear how the arguments FOR racism are in ANY way different from the ones for homophobia. or even womens rights.
I mean let's be honest dude blacks are just genetically inferior and it's clear that they have less of a right to the refined rights that us white people do.
chances are you're completely missing the point by conflating the wrong arguements.
Again i would love to see the difference in logical structure.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@Jahkillian hint the arguments AGAINST racism are constructed to involve the idea that the colour of ones skin makes NO difference to the rights and capabilities of the person.
By all means try to justify your position, you won't be able to do it.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 I don't understand how that has anything to do with blacks fighting for "BASIC" civil rights,(the same rights gays already have) To gays wanting to remove gender. You can't even compare the two, and it pisses a lot of blacks off.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
really? what about black gay people?
mabye the black people you're talking about are like the one in the video. i.e. bigoted. And as hard as it may be for your mind to grasp, no i'm not racist. talking about the issue objectively does not equate to racism.
No-ones removing gender They are removing the block on equal rights as human beings
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
you're underlying argument I suspect is that you don't view gays as equal.
If not it's irrelevant your point is logically invalid, the argument is the same structure
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Your throwing out the word "Equal Rights" way to easy with out fully understanding it. Its not equal rights because you say so. Gays have the right to vote, work, live anywhere they want, etc All the basic rights as every one else. You can't say "my house is smaller then yours, I want a bigger house" Equal Rights. Or we should all get paid the same. Equal rights. We already have equal rights. You literally want to ad "extra rights" for gays. Do you know what bigot means?
Jahkillian 1 year ago
is being allowed to enter into civil partnership based on gender not an invasion of rights.
you cannot argue this because you haven't got a fucking leg to stand on.
gays do NOT have the same rights because prop 8 explicitly denies this right.
What fucking planet are you on dude?
You still haven't argued for your side. you're use of the phrase "because you say so" is pitiful dude.
I don't say so the FUCKING constitution says so.
I still think
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@Jahkillian tell me the fundamental difference between straight and gay people dude?
You're just emphasising the point that you're defending bigotry here.
"You literally want to ad "extra rights" for gays." tell me. What EXACTLY are these extra rights?
How the fuck is legal partnership the same as how much you earn.
Again you're just someone who views gay people as non-equals
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
you're an idiot if you honestly aren't aware of what's been going on lately with gay rights.
you have WATCHED the video right. you do KNOW what we're talking about here. Or were you just planning on pushing some black racism bullshit on me.
A black male can get married to his partner
A black GAY male cannot get to his partner
Spoon Feed™ central
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
just curious, if you new 2 brothers that wanted to have sex and get married would you support them and be for them getting married?
Jahkillian 1 year ago
@Jahkillian lol are we THAT bored?
That's like the classic utilitarian argument for if there's ever a justifiable cause for rape.
2 brothers having sex is not morally wrong though it is perhaps viewed by society as something not recommended a: that's not strictly about them being gay and b: them having sex is irrelevant to the argument as to whether they wanted to get married.
lol would you be against a brother an sister being being married? woo yeah flip and reverse it!
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 I wasn't making a argument, never said anything about morals, or rape. I was just asking a simple yes or no question. Which im not sure you even did? So you'd support them and be for them getting married? A simple yes or no is ok.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
duh, clearly you don't know what i'm talking about. The question doesn't warrant a simplistic yes, no justification dimwit.
your question wasn't a simple yes no.
Again if it is why don't you answer the counter question
"is it alright for a brother and sister to get married and if not WHY not"
people who tend to ask those kinds of question very rarely actually want a straight yes no answer.
did you remember to beat your wife last night? a simple yes no will suffice.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 No i wouldn't support brother and sister or any family members getting married. I'm apposed to even cousins getting married. My point is this, you yell EQUAL RIGHTS, but really don't know what it means, just use it for your cause. Equal rights to me would mean, 2 sisters, 2 brothers, Uncle and niece, man with multiple wives, wife with multiple husbands, etc and anything else were 2 or more adults would want to get married.
Why are you against 2 brothers getting married?
Jahkillian 1 year ago
umm I think you've been watching too many of those bullshit brainwashing channels on your channel by that mormon dude.
The fact you have to ask that question of course is evidence you dont know how to think for yourself.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 Well answer it and educate me. You want people to understand gays but when we ask questions, you get offended and use your safe word , bigot or homophobe.
If you're for EQUAL RIGHTS why aren't you for 2 brothers getting married? You sound like a bigot, that you would be happy with your rights but not somebody else s. Whats the difference? You're now starting to sound like a bigot. :)
Jahkillian 1 year ago
umm no I don't want YOU to understand gays because the simple fact is it requires THOUGHT on your part, stop trying to rationalise your idiocy.
Why would I want to educate you dude you don't even realise you lost the argument about 5 comments down. Now sit down and stfu.
I said I wouldn't support them I never said it wasn't there legal right not to other than I provisionally issued a caveat on the grounds that inter family marriage might not be classed as legally justifiable
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 i am thinking for my self. Nature doesn't even recognize 2 of the same sex. It rejects it with no reward. They can't reproduce. The fact that homosexuals haven't died out, proves its not genetic or natural. THEY CANT REPRODUCE! Nature says "SCIENTIFICALLY" you want to do that, I'm not helping or condoning it!. You wont get any help from me. NOTHING! If anything from history, nature tried everything to stop it. hiv, AIDs, buts that another argument.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
naturalistic fallacy.
enjoy trying to justify your bigotry.
The fact that homosexual HAVEN'T died out demonstrates that they is no inherent negative for them being here.
Umm heterosexuals get AIDS too ya dumbass. try checking your facts
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
some women can't reproduce, does that mean it's wrong to allow them to adopt, have fertility treatments or for another woman to grow their baby inside her womb?
Come back to class when you're over the age of 15 dude.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
What's interesting is that HIV neither targets gay or straight people. If it did there would be a genetic precursor precluding one genetic pool form the other.
Given that both gay and straight people contract the disease you don't have a leg to stand on for your argument.
Both gay and straight people engage in anal sex so you have no argument.
The simple fact is it selects people via blood transfusion. A straight man can give a gay man hiv by injecting him by mistake.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 the fact you can send me messages but i can't send you because you've locked your account from the real world says it all.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
@Jahkillian pretty much.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
no iu've just locked my account from bog brained psychos like you who believe any bullshit they come across.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@Jahkillian lol care to explain why I should unlock my account to accept non friend messages?
Great going moron.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 You said you wouldn't support 2 brothers that wanted to get married, the same way some people wouldn't support gay marriage. You call them bigots, but your doing the same thing.
I can tell you know the truth by the way you answer and name calling. PATIENT ZERO WAS A HOMO! He s been interviewed many times, he purposely spread AIDs even after knowing he had it. Other homos new they had it and continued to spreed it. 1000s of gays had Aids before any hetros.But you know this.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
there is no evidence for patient zero being homo or even existing as you stated. and even if it was like I SAID (see what I mean about you not telling to truth when talking about learning?) it wouldn't MATTER if he was gay or not. AIDs is not spread by people because they're gay.
you're taking urban legends and spouting them as fact.
Go to africa. there are plenty of heterosexual males spreading HV
Your complete ignorance of the disease demonstrates why you're so easily swayed by homophobia.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 I can't debate with you any further. To deny patient zero is the stupidest thing i've heard. This is why you should unlock your account , so you can get all the information. Heres a a random Youtube video of patient zero and homos spreading the AIDS virus. watch?v=EsUMFPvZ6w0
Is well documented who patient zero is and that he was a homosexual. The first record of AIDS/HIV in North America was from gay males. This is well documented information, which would take you 1 sec.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
@Jahkillian you were never debating me to begin with mate.
You didn't even understand the most basic of concepts.
Patient zero was debunked. Or mabye you shouldn't get all your info off of random videos on youtube. Like I said you miss my point entirely.
Again you're an idiot for not even understanding what HIV is about and how this is even supposed to relate to civil rights.
HIV was started by sexually promiscuous people not practicing safe sex.
Wikipedia backs me up on this.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1
cdc.gov
"" The occurrence of pneumocystosis in these 5 previously healthy individuals without a clinically apparent underlying immunodeficiency is unusual. The fact that these patients were all HOMOSEXUAL suggests an association between some aspect of a homosexual lifestyle or disease acquired through sexual contact and Pneumocystis pneumonia in this population. """""
The first recorded AID patients in North America were homosexual.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
fuck the 2 brothers situation I happily retract that statement and since state that as marriage is LEGALLY defined as
"the legal or religious ceremony that formalizes the decision of two people to live as a married couple, including the accompanying social festivities"
Thus you can happily swivel. Any 2 people can get married if they want to.
Like I said I have no issue with the morality AT ALL (but you're too deaf/blind to understand basic english) I wa just unsure about the legal defin.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@DarkKnightBob1o1 you should unlock your account so your not just feeding information you want to hear, but get all sides and opinions. Thats how you learn.
You're doing what extreme religious do. You're saying "My way and only MY way, I don't care if its right or wrong" The most intelligent accounts keep the info pipe line wide open. They're collecting information. Like I was trying to do with you.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
@Jahkillian umm no. common sense says that doing so just invies spam and hatemail. No thanks if you want to say something you can do so on the channel where freedom of speech is not a right because it's my site.
You were trying to do nothing of the sort, you know perfectly well that's a lie and I ain't falling for it.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
I feed myself with information that is rational and reliable. you are neither. feel free to place yourself in the category of conspiracy troll.
I don't want to know about your ignorance thanks
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@Jahkillian my account is there for people who are not total cunts to contact me.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
umm I find it strange you're trying to accuse me of bigotry when it's you who are categorically denying an entire gender set in order to prove your point
Again you openly state you think blacks can have equal rights but gay people can't get married. Yet you don't even give a reason..
Let's be honest you just don't like the idea.
and as for the brothers thing considering i'm pretty much al for almost everything here it's hardly what I would qualitatively call a bigot.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
I would answer no PROVISIONALLY on the grounds that marriage is required between two separate family lines.
PROVISIONALLY.
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
@Jahkillian and would I support them? no.
would it be their right to do it? again as below I think perhaps not legally but hey saying that a dude married his female shaped pillow right?
DarkKnightBob1o1 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DarkKnightBob1o1 "A black male can get married to his partner
A black GAY male cannot get to his partner"
All you did was removed the word "WIFE" and replaced it with "PARTNER" to make it fit.
The truth is , a black male can marry only ONE WOMAN.
Any male can marry ONE WOMAN!
Thats pretty equal.
Jahkillian 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DarkKnightBob1o1
just curious, if you new 2 brothers that wanted to have sex and get married would you support them and be for them getting married?
Jahkillian 1 year ago
Bigotry is so sad. What's even sadder is people that don't realize they're bigots. This minister is an example! Gay marriage is a civil rights issue, period. If you don't agree with it, too bad. You don't get to decide whether I deserve to have the same rights as everyone else.
chickenbuttguesswhat 1 year ago
the fact that this is even a question is SOOOO PATHETIC!!! it tears our CONSTITUTION in half, thats all that matters...debate ended, nothing else to talk about...basically it comes down to the smart few vs the stupid many...im glad im not gay cause i would be getting furious
pawndominance1 1 year ago
How can a black man, after all the years of persecution and quite recent civil rights revolution, turn around and strip gay people of equal rights? Hypocrite much?
Our government is not a democracy and for good reason. Pure democracy fails because it squashes minorities. It doesn't matter what you (or 99.99% of the country) think, everyone it supposed to have equal rights under our republic government.
rafaravioli 2 years ago 8
@rafaravioli Black persecution and suposed gay discrimination are very different. Don't make such a stupid, ignorant statement as to claim just b/c he is black he should be for gay rights.
mytuber81 1 year ago
oh and thank you for uploading =D
wickedalwayz82 2 years ago
Our courts are there to give equal and impartial justice. Why are you going to punish people for doing what is legally right. They are there to uphold our constitution not your bible. If churches start getting involved in polictics and start meddling in court matters maybe courts should start meddling in chuch affairs. Seperation of chuch and state. I have freedom of religion and your violating my rights by imposing your beliefs on me!!! Our government CANNOT BEND TO THE WILL OF ANY RELIGION.
wickedalwayz82 2 years ago 3
Cool! another one! :) keep-um-coming
cjezach 2 years ago