Marijuana should be legalized, regulated and taxed.
Having said that, the 'harm' that the government has decided upon are the intoxicating effects- which do not wear off as clearly or as quickly as alcohol, the psychoactive effects and the long range deleterious brain deficits. This is their basis to 'harm to the community'. To state their is no legal harm is incorrect- whether there is actual harm is up for debate.
Mr. Stevens' of logic is what gets the uninformed and stupid locked up.
@darthcom1 I am not the dumbass I looked it up here and so they are the dumb asses,Corpus Delicti - Criminal Law Lawyer Source
criminal-law-lawyer-sourceDOTcom Terms
Corpus delicti is the legal term, which refers to the body of the offense or the ... Corpus delicti—from the Latin meaning “body of evidence”—is the proof that a ...
"Code," "statute," "ordinance," they are all laws. Just to clarify, I'm a huge Ron Paul supporter, believe in freedom and the minimum amount of laws possible to protect people from personal injury or property crimes.
Anyone who has even been within 100 feet of a law school, or who a basic knowledge of law, will disagree with the title of this video. I would LOVE to see this clown explain this theory to a judge. The judge would SHIT all over him. He completely makes up every word of what he says in this video.
Some counties don't even require you to sign their tickets. In fact, after receiving a seat belt violation, there was NO WHERE on the ticket to even sign. The cop handed me the ticket, and told me I was free to go. I felt like asking him at the time where's the consideration for the contract..
Law is contract, contract makes the law, and consent makes the contract.
'There's two elements to a valid cause of action. 1) the violation of a legal right (life, liberty, property, etc) and 2) injury.' WRONG.
So too is the guy in this video. The elements of crimes are clearly defined in the Crimes Acts or similar or your country. In no way need there be 'injury' and that is far from what Corpus delicti means fyi.
Don't listen to clowns like this I am a law student with no bias; this is not how it works.
Common law from what I can understand it was a bunch of judge that created that law. By deciding what was going to be law. So what is to stop the judges from changing parts of the common law tort law, criminal law on traffic law, tax law, to say you don’t need to give your name? It seems to me they have done just that over the years.
The government written laws (statues)(acts) and the judges have adopted them and over the years turned them into common law and adjusted older laws to allow the newer laws to prevail.
@samten10a The government written laws (statues)(acts) and the judges have adopted them and over the years turned them into common law and adjusted older laws to allow the newer laws to prevail. SPAM?
Crime is an act or omission that the law makes punishable. It can also be the breach of a legal duty, which is treated as the subject matter of a criminal proceeding. There are serious and less serious crimes. However common law recognizes only two classes of crimes- serious crimes or felonies and minor crimes or misdemeanors.
i recently was stopped given a ticket . i then wrote to sectary of state priminister and local mp and police service statin i give and gave no consent im will not pay the fine no consent given...i several times said no consent in all emails sent. 60 days later the officer WHO IS A TRAFFIC COP (CONFLICT OF INTEREST??)TELLS ME HE CANT DEERMINE BETWEEN ME AND THE OFFICER WHOS RIGHT SO WE HAVE TO GO TO COURT ..BUT I GAVE NO FUCKIN CONSENT HOW THE FUCK CAN THIS STILL STAND ??
@giroyagetme did you sign the tcket?and make sure you dont get tricked into the court case being lible on you make sure they are taking you to court and its them starting the prosess...if you signed the ticket then there isnt really much you can do now ,unless you where made to sign it under duress ,like you feared for your safety in anyway ...no victim no crime so remenber dont sign
@reksub10 'No victim no crime'? Well that is completely wrong. There need be no 'injury' or 'victim'. I would argue that society in general is victimized by a speeding driver who could at any moment crash his car and ruin a person's life. Regardless, LexisNexis Legal Dictionary: "Crime: a wrong punishable by the state usually involving an actus reus and mens rea." At no point need there be an injury or victim. As a law student I can say these people are wrong and have misled you all.
@michaeltbear were not saying theyre right were saying your system is pish and corrput to the bone theres no denying that and we want the republic back we have been holding in law society cant be hurt as its a fiction ,so who is the side thats misleading ,the side that takes us to court at the barrel of a gun or the ones who have the people interest instead of profit scince the advocates rotted it all to the core and your learning to make a living from telling lies all day ,,good luck with that
@michaeltbear So what about if I get Summons to appear in "Criminal Court" for an "Open Container"? I've eaten up dozen's of those cases with this guy's information. Hell, I got another Open Container case in January which I only ask 2 questions:
1) Is the cop who made the complaint claiming personal injury or harm from me drinking a 24 oz of budweiser?
2) Are the "PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK" claiming personal injury or harm from me drinking a 24 oz of budweiser?
@michaeltbear As a law student I think you might not want to drink all the B.A.R. Kool-Aid. It might taste good and be wrapped in a nice package, but it's still just coloring, water, and sugar. All I'm saying is what this guy saying is right I've used it and haven't paid a fine for speeding in a car or drinking in public aka Open Container in about 8 years.
DUI's you're right there need not to be a victim or injury. Everything else no injury "Criminal" or damages "civil" NO crime.
@michaeltbear no you are dead wrong, no victim no crime, you system is the other group of terrorists, police commit more than 50% of the burglarliesand or conduct through street criminals, judges police and insurance industry are frauding poolsof billions, we need to bring all of you to justice all assets you hold belong to those of us you have frauded and stolen from. it is time for a legitimate system where the victicms are reimbursed from loses and we prosecute for injuries
@chris532008 Not to mention sanitizing crimes for the worst criminals:PEDOPHILES and other child abusers; they've been repeated connected to DRUG DEALERS as well!
The DEA is a TURF protection/ SLAVE racket with police and fire providing cover.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Please don't listen to this guy! He will absolutely get you put in jail if you think for a minute his info is accurate. Nowhere in criminal law will you find that a harm must be done. I think he is confused with civil law where a plaintiff is suing a defendant for damages.
The courts can only hear cases and controversies. A valid cause of action is mandatory for a court to hear a case. There's two elements to a valid cause of action. 1) the violation of a legal right (life, liberty, property, etc) and 2) injury.
Also, every time the State is the plaintiff there can be no fair trial because the judge is paid by the plaintiff/State. There's a conflict of interest. Imagine a contested divorce wherein your mother in law was the judge -- a conflict of interest.
@UnoRaza The judge is the legal expert so he's not going to allow a novice to show him up. It's most important to know how to question the cop/witness at trail and question the judge. You may ask your question at the forum at marcstevens(DOT)net -- where there's ample room for a dialog.
Nobody is ever tried in court for a "crime," they are tried for "felonies" and "misdemeanors." Some call those "crimes" but the court system does not officially define them that way. That is why this blowhard is wrong, why he never wins any cases, and why this video is just the propagation of a scam.
SADLY... everybody I know who has tried Marc's method has LOST. If you "win" there will be no record, but I would like to hear testimony of "success" with his approach.
Government is men and women providing services at the barrel of a gun. There is no principle-agent relationship. Taxes are compulsory. Pay up or go to jail. They don't represent you. They own you. Government has no voluntary support.
@Time2RebelNOW First, it's not my government. Second, you admit to paying for government-criminals to rob the populace. Thus, you tacitly admit to being complicit in their plunder of hundreds of millions of people. You even go so far as to say you own them -- own the liars, thieves and killers.
So, the only way, under trust law, for them to be able to charge the trust is to get the authorization from the beneficiary us, and the only way for them to benefit from their charge is to get us to switch roles from beneficiary to trustee and for them to switch their role from trustee to beneficiary because no party can be both, at the same time. They must somehow trick us into accepting the role of trustee. Why would we do so when the trust is for our benefit?
If you don't like the law, vote to change it and lobby your legislature. It is a crime because it is what the people have voted it to be. This "corpus delecti" stuff is fun for academia but is pretty much worthless in real life. Attorneys wouldn't argue this b/c they would be laughed out of court.
Is said property registered with the state proporty offical, and if so does that alone give them the right (under their system) to have control of your property and the usage there of? So what of other charges or other violations they will come up with. Let's not forget ordinances, and some of the other 2.5 million laws and regs. Not avocating the gov but we really need an order for sovereignty of representation. An organization for a new society perhaps.
He makes a huge mistake. First off, I think he's right, but only because I know that marijuana is harmless. But let's just pretend the DEA is right and weed is harmful. Then there is indeed no victim. Yet. But as soon as that pot is harvested and smoked, there will be one. Something is a crime if there is a victim, or if there WILL be one. Otherwise, you could use his arguments for growing coke too, or even building a nuclear warhead.
you are right,but until he does harvest and sells or smokes it ,there is no victim nor a crime,therefore he can not be prosecuted and no even the fact that there might be a victim down the road is not a crime,simple because this isnt the minory report,future victims do NOT count,at least not yet
sure i dont have no problem with it at all,as long as it doesnt harm no one,like with the radioactive crap in there,you can have 1000's of them,but if something goes wrong with them your on the hook ;)
1. an action or an instance of negligence that is deemed injurious to the public welfare or morals or to the interests of the state and that is legally prohibited.
2. criminal activity and those engaged in it: to fight crime.
3. the habitual or frequent commission of crimes: a life of crime.
@paulagloria, No I don't know marc personally nor do I know his sucess rate? How he wins is simple really , a court of inferior jurisdiction, ie not a supreme court, has to have four elements to give it jurisdiction. A plaintiff or complaintant, a defendant, subject matter jurisdiction and a competent fact witness. In almost all instances, it lacks one or more of these elements
Go look up a man named Richard Cornforth, he explains it best!!
Well, folks, this looks like it. I mean, fuck "law school" and "college". All those "professionals" don't know anything. Clearly, only this uneducated man on YouTube knows the law.
@gorgeousdzastr I can't say whether or not he is educated, but I know for certain he is not educated in the law based on the fact that he misunderstands what the Corpus Delicti is. He also says it's nonsense that a legal right could belong to an entire community, but it's actually very sensible. A park, for example, is public property. That means it belongs to the community. If someone damages the park, they have violated the rights of the community that holds it, as opposed to one individual.
@thegreatfish ...im thinking he says it is non-sense that a legal right could belong to an entire community....because legal rights are INDIVIDUALLY ESTABLISHED ON SOVEREIGHNTY.......and if they were 'community/govt' based.....then each individuals interpretation would be different and thus incapable of being upheld...and then a selective few probably ends up claiming what 'majority rules' mean...and good chance that is something that can pay its way to making the 'laws/rules'.not representative
@EntouchNetwork Actually it's just the opposite. When every individual gets to define their own rights, then you have too many interpretations to be upheld. When the community agrees on rights held by that community, then it becomes manageable. Also, the sovereignty of communities has been well established in history, whether it be nations, states, or cities. Communities have a long history of claiming sovereignty. Just look at the U.S.A. when the Colonies declared independence from England.
@EntouchNetwork That's not relevant. The point is that communities have been claiming sovereignty AS communities for hundreds of years, so for Marc to claim community rights are nonsense shows his lack of understanding about law. Also the fact that he is incorrectly defining the Corpus Delicti.
@thegreatfish my take on it is he seems VERY INTELLIGENT...i'd ask him if i were you...as he seems to make EXTREMELY VALID points overall and has won a number of cases...and in terms of incorrectly definining??...doesnt law boil down to INTERPRETATION and PERCEPTION...they have MADE UP fraud consistently along the way.....i have an lawyer as an attorney and remember him emphatically saying..."they make it up along the way ...as they go!" SO WELL SAID.
@EntouchNetwork I have spoken with him, and he has not won any cases as far as I can tell. I went on his message board and pointed out that the only cases people ever post are cases where he lost, and no one had yet posted a single case where he won. I asked him to provide at least one example of him winning and he deleted my posts from the board instead. Marc is just a shyster who feeds people this fantasy that he can win any case so he can get your money.
@thegreatfish and from my INTERPRETATION of Corpus Delicti....he is NOT defining it incorrectly. THERE IS NO CRIME......just as he says....look it up!!! "The prosecution in a criminal case has the burden of proving EACH ELEMENT of a crime in order to secure a conviction. " ....there IS NO CRIME!
@EntouchNetwork He believes the corpus delicti is used to determine if a law is valid. That is improper. The test of corpus delicti is used to determine if the crime being accused has actually been committed. In otherwords, corpus delicti would not be used to determine if growing marijuana is a crime, it would be used to determine if someone has been growing marijuana. The determination of whether growing marijuana can be a crime is done under a due process test, not corpus delicti.
@thegreatfish you rights are infinite. You've signed applications with a corp pretending to be the gov. The applications are contracts wherein you assign (lol didn't know huh) the state to be your attorney in fact and becaome a ward and incompentent. They then multiply the power by transmitting it to various agencies through reciprocal agreements theat bind you.
That all the statutes rare: CONTRACTS activated by YOUR ACTION which allows them to claim JURISDICTION through CONSENT.
@thegreatfish ...not representative of INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY.....which of course would make it non-sense....this is how we got our current state...of fraudulent gov't....thus he consistently states "govt's are established to protect and maintain..INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS"
@MidnightWins2 Sounds like you would leave your fate and rights in the hands of those who purport to be the "real" experts. (i.e. lawyers, judges, law professors, etc.) I'm certainly not saying law education and practice is "wrong" or worthless. But the point here is that we all must wake up and deal with the fact that the legal system is taking our rights and freedoms a little more every day, mostly because of our ignorance, and the selfish motivations of our opponents.
@darnoc698 And under common law, it is NOT unlawful as long as there is consent. Under common law, there must be a victim, and the state can not be a victim.
my understanding is much more simple....proof of a crime is malice aforethought or malicious intent. No malice, no crime. As many people say, no harm no foul.
my understanding is much for simple....proof of a crime is malice aforethought or malicious intent. No malice, no crime. As many people say, no harm no foul.
It is really this simple. Fact of injury, loss, or harm? Not giving identification to a police officer is not a crime. People making up their own rules and causing violence to you even, if they are public employees, is a crime. Sue them!
Just to let the youtube world know. I went to my court hearing demanded My inalienable rights, common law jurisdiction, and voided a divorce deree all in one notice. The hearing was then backed out of the court docket. Three weeks later a get an "Order" in the mail saying the case is dissmissed. Funny thing is they State refered to me as an attorney of which I never said I was nor claimed to be. what goof balls.
Also he says that Prohibition was repealed because people wouldn't convict. Not true. Or at least only partly true. If people failed to convict bar owners and liquor suppliers, it was, in most cases, because they valued their lives and knew that guys like Al Capone would be pissed. Prohibition was repealed because it was a failure. People like to drink. People were sick of the corruption and violence that it created. .
I'm not a lawyer, so won't argue his views of crime vs tort. I will argue his opinion that the jury system is flawed because people are forced to serve. A criminal has a right to be judged by his peers. People often do things only if a) the consequence is good or b) the consequence of NOT doing it is bad. No government has the $ to pay people their salaries while they are on jury duty. So the alternative is a threat.
@MrRiceowlex You can say "I object" but you better off saying "I do not consent" I object might lead to other liable dialogue. Just say I do not consent" to any sentencing, and you'll avoid the trap.
This man is smart I no thi has nothin to do with. This but what can I do abt this ok so all the time I go walking at like 9:00pm and the cops stop me and say tht I can not walk past 9:00pm I'm not Doin nothing wrong and they still tell me tht they will take me in if I keep doing it what is the crime for walking u tell me thts like me telling u tht u cant eat
@DeathDude72 : Read Rousseau through Rawls and get the hell away from these jokes. They don't have a community college understanding of natural philosophy, much less an authoritative grasp.
To the rest of you: disregard anyone's comments but bigyellowism. I am a lawyer, and these other crackpot theories and ignorance will screw you should you rely on them.
@babycanaryyellin : Just because the cops let one nut off instead of dealing with his bullshit does not make the position legal.
@jahastings3 Funny you use "theory" with "crackpot" but not "crackpot" with "law", because they BOTH are theories. However.. you must be talking about someone who "understands" those colorful "statutes and codes" that has the "force of law" but are NOT Law. The words "Color of law", is how you are memorizing everyone to think it is actual Law. Are you saying there is no such thing as LAW or color of law? Or are you saying there is NO difference?
What I wanna know is who are these people that made the state? Who was "Og"'s grandfather that said "work or die"? WHY do we have to work in order to live a comfortable life? The question I've asked over and over again is who are these people that control us and everything we do?
here's another and more potent arguement.. Genesis 1:29.. what God gave to man, man cannot take away.. "Congress shall make no Law respecting the establishment of Religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.." in a nutshell..
This guy is an agent. He is not telling that if you are a 14th and 15th amendment citizen, the judge still has jurisdiction over you. Unless you declare a Sovereign.
A crime is a misdemanor or a felony. Can you explain civil infraction? What is the rule to that? I heard cause of action but I believe that is more of a tort in civil cases where the state isn't the plaintiff.
This is my definition of LAW Something that was created once and can never be changed. Examples: If you jump off a cliff your gonna fall (gravity), When your born your gonna die no gettin around it (death), If you touch fire your gonna get burned (hot)
My point is: Learn the law before you go into the courtroom- and fight smart- If you want to change the law, go to the legislature. Or you can use this crap and end up doing more time...If this worked, then everyone would do it. A little knowledge is dangerous, especially when your own liberty is at stake. I'm not defending the system, and sometimes you can win, but not with this. Good Luck!
@bigyelowism a tort is a civil wrong , having an accident, unintentionally harming someone, and yes there can be a criminal charge with torts. What Marc is trying to explain is that the state is a fiction and can no more be harmed than Willy Coyote in a cartoon. When the state tries, to call something a crime, it is infact the breaking of a statue or code, there is no real injured party The state simple wants to steal and control someone else, and they do cause harm to real people.
@unclefixer There doesn't have to be an injured party for conduct to amount to a crime. Tort requires loss/harm, and I think that's where he gets his wires crossed. Saying that a crime is a wrong against the state is just another way of saying that a crime is conduct that the legislature (who are elected representatives of the people) think is injurious to society in general. We can't just go making up our own definitions of 'crime'. Fiction or not, the state's in a better position to define it
@unclefixer I hate cops, and love the idea of loopholes.... show me an example of this subject matter working for a marijuana grower and I may listen...
@unclefixer Don't jump to those conclusions too quickly. A fiction can still be harmed. The most common example is a corporation. While not a living being or a concrete object, a corporation is still an entity that may be harmed in the form of monetary loss. If you rob a bank, you would not be stealing from any person individually, but you would still be stealing from a corporation, which represents many individual's interests. A state is essentially the same, representing an entire community.
@thegreatfish I think the rebuttal to this notion would be the fact that the corporation is a legal fiction in itself. In a stateless society the corporation would not exist. Responsibility would fall on the owner. This means any harm to come to the bank would be harm to the owner or his property not the collective group or corporation. At least this is my understanding of it currently. ;)
@neue01 I'm not so sure this would be true. A corporation is really nothing more than a group of people who have decided to invest in a common business. While it's true that a corporation probably wouldn't be afforded the same legal breaks in a stateless society, I can't see why a group of people couldn't pool their money and start their own business. I think identifying the fiction as a party, like a state or corporation, is just easier than trying to individually identify each member.
Mr./Ms. black, He may have a few good points, but at the same time I can disagree. I dont have to like all of his logics, thats with anyone. If you blindly follow someone just because its what people,media tells you to, and bashing people who dont follow, you are being "contolled"
Never said it didn't, but just cuz it's done bad doesn't mean it's not great. Our Republic benefits everyone. Just giving an ex. of marc Stevens logic, which you seem to like.
Of course not. and no one is "controlling me" cuz i don't break the law. If you don't like the laws we live by then you are free to leave America (i.e the greatest nation on earth). but as long as you do you must obey the rules that have been established. No society can function with no law, what you get without gov and laws/rules is chaos/anarchy..now if thats what you want then ok, but I will fight against you everytime.
@boots13100 It's actually spelled "American" Another prob is anarchy can lead to a totalitarian or communist society. I don't want that nor anarchy. I love our Republic. If I ever see Marc Stevens, you or any of his "followers" getting robbed, attacked, etc, I'll be sure to not call the cops or help, I'll "volunteer" to not help.
@black9897 You say Amerikkka is the best nation on earth like it never did any harm to anyone,but if it benifits you and your agenda its ok. And what does being attacked have to do with the comment??? If that was the case Ill fight back like any normal person would (if threatened) everyones not as cowardly as most people, and some of us do think for our selves.
@black9897 Total Government leads to communism, fascism, totalitarianism and any other form of statism. The biggest crimes against humanity have occured under government NOT anarchy. The cops by law are not there to protect you they are simply law enforcement. If you want protection hire someone who depends on you staying alive, private security.
@DemiosOctavo Yes I know. but having none can also pave the way to that by having someone step in..kinda like hitler. so? anarchy is still bad. I know that, but if it requires to protect you then they will.
Just cuz you think it's not a crime or it only is if someone gets hurt n what not, doesn't mean you're right. The law says different. Plenty of things can be crimes without someone getting hurt.
@Ctupper1990 well it's what we go by, we have to have law. don't like it move. Spitting on the sidewalk is a public health code violation (class 4 misdemeanor in my state) a bit silly but it's still part of the law.
It's not your property, so they can do whatever they want. You're just renting the property, you're just a tenant on the land, look at your colorable deed. They do and will make any law they want and if you break it you can go to jail because you have a contract agreeing to all this and don't even know it.
When you say Constitution which one are you referring to? There are three you know?
@maverick10241 ...... Sounds like you believe you already lost. I dont care what they do. I care about what I do. I show they are breaking the law and taking up to the court. If the court does the same, I add them as defendants as well. Just cuz no one is doing it, doesnt mean it cant be done. Besides, its more money for you since nobody is doing it. One man can change a states laws if he chooses to.It just takes time. Something that most dont have.
you is forgetting the crimes against you as a innocent law-abiding citizen until these uniform arrived, smashed my property and stole my property so who's the victim in this?? you are!!!
who's innocent and who's guilty of treason, war crimes, and crimes against you and the rest of mankind?? It aint you for growing plants but them for trashing your freedoms and unlawfully attacking you and your property!!!
Corpus delicti (plural: corpora delicti) (Latin: "body of crime") is a term from Western jurisprudence which refers to the principle that it must be proven that a crime has occurred before a person can be convicted of committing the crime. For example, a person cannot be tried for larceny unless it can be proven that property has been stolen.
I have free information on fighting tickets of all kinds.Did you know you can charge an officer with assult with a deadly weapon. contact me at davesevaw@gmail.com. I have paid over a grand getting this information but I will share it for free. We need to expose this scam. Unless you are in the act of commerce traffic violation dont pertain to you.
I don't see why the idea of a community of people having rights is nonsense, as Marc states at the beginning of his video. If a community of people want to reserve specific rights for themselves, like the right to freedom of speech, or even the right to live, then I believe they should be able to, and I also believe they should be allowed to instate a judicial system to make sure those rights are preserved for the people of the community. Why does Marc hate having rights so much?
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny The rights you refer to are individual rights, not community rights. Besides that, governments are instituted to insure protections of the rights of the individual. A group or community should not be afforded rights superior to those of the individual due to the risks of abuse that would guarantee.
@OverTaxed42Long A right that belongs to every member of the community would be a community right. A right that belongs to one person is an individual right. The right to step on my property is individual because only I have that right. Right to live is a community right, because everyone in the community has it. Generally, they are in balance with each other. Marc doesn't believe we should afford equal rights to all members of the community. He prefers a voluntary system.
All so called laws are contract laws.
myjuicemike 6 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This vid went viral on Turkmenistan
francissanfo717 1 week ago
Jews need to be regulated and taxed by humans and not the other way around any more.
oveid 1 week ago
Comment removed
FreakAlert2008 2 weeks ago
Marijuana should be legalized, regulated and taxed.
Having said that, the 'harm' that the government has decided upon are the intoxicating effects- which do not wear off as clearly or as quickly as alcohol, the psychoactive effects and the long range deleterious brain deficits. This is their basis to 'harm to the community'. To state their is no legal harm is incorrect- whether there is actual harm is up for debate.
Mr. Stevens' of logic is what gets the uninformed and stupid locked up.
mjkmojofool 3 weeks ago
@mjkmojofool NOTHING should be TAXED; if an entity needs money to 'run their commerce"....then provide a SERVICE and EARN it!!
EntouchNetwork 1 week ago
Your video is a favorite on San Salvador
erryfleming11k 1 month ago
Wait. I'm confused now . Are you really growing marijuana in your backyard?
TheSherrykelly 1 month ago
Corpus Delecti simply means body of evidence,i think he may have this confused with something else!
2wheels88 1 month ago
@2wheels88 body of CRIME dumbass
he didnt get anything mixed up
but nice try
darthcom1 1 month ago
@darthcom1 I am not the dumbass I looked it up here and so they are the dumb asses,Corpus Delicti - Criminal Law Lawyer Source
criminal-law-lawyer-sourceDOTcom Terms
Corpus delicti is the legal term, which refers to the body of the offense or the ... Corpus delicti—from the Latin meaning “body of evidence”—is the proof that a ...
2wheels88 1 month ago
@2wheels88 then chose your source better next time
darthcom1 1 month ago
@darthcom1 Thanks for your apology have a nice day!
2wheels88 1 month ago
"Code," "statute," "ordinance," they are all laws. Just to clarify, I'm a huge Ron Paul supporter, believe in freedom and the minimum amount of laws possible to protect people from personal injury or property crimes.
FoxeoVideos 1 month ago
it makes sense no victim no crime right? well i looked up corpus delicti and it doesnt have anything to do with this. so idk
Time2RebelNOW 1 month ago
Anyone who has even been within 100 feet of a law school, or who a basic knowledge of law, will disagree with the title of this video. I would LOVE to see this clown explain this theory to a judge. The judge would SHIT all over him. He completely makes up every word of what he says in this video.
navid500 1 month ago
Is circumcision a crime?
stickysound 1 month ago
no victim no crime
MirageScience 2 months ago
Some counties don't even require you to sign their tickets. In fact, after receiving a seat belt violation, there was NO WHERE on the ticket to even sign. The cop handed me the ticket, and told me I was free to go. I felt like asking him at the time where's the consideration for the contract..
Law is contract, contract makes the law, and consent makes the contract.
gorgeousdzastr 2 months ago
I was looking for people vs lopez case - found one but Im not sure its the same one .. do you have a link to that case.
goodfellow67216 2 months ago
'There's two elements to a valid cause of action. 1) the violation of a legal right (life, liberty, property, etc) and 2) injury.' WRONG.
So too is the guy in this video. The elements of crimes are clearly defined in the Crimes Acts or similar or your country. In no way need there be 'injury' and that is far from what Corpus delicti means fyi.
Don't listen to clowns like this I am a law student with no bias; this is not how it works.
michaeltbear 3 months ago
@michaeltbear is an act a law?
1allstarman 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Common law from what I can understand it was a bunch of judge that created that law. By deciding what was going to be law. So what is to stop the judges from changing parts of the common law tort law, criminal law on traffic law, tax law, to say you don’t need to give your name? It seems to me they have done just that over the years.
samten10a 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The government written laws (statues)(acts) and the judges have adopted them and over the years turned them into common law and adjusted older laws to allow the newer laws to prevail.
samten10a 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@samten10a The government written laws (statues)(acts) and the judges have adopted them and over the years turned them into common law and adjusted older laws to allow the newer laws to prevail. SPAM?
MUST B TRUE.
UnoRaza 1 month ago
Crime is an act or omission that the law makes punishable. It can also be the breach of a legal duty, which is treated as the subject matter of a criminal proceeding. There are serious and less serious crimes. However common law recognizes only two classes of crimes- serious crimes or felonies and minor crimes or misdemeanors.
samten10a 3 months ago
i recently was stopped given a ticket . i then wrote to sectary of state priminister and local mp and police service statin i give and gave no consent im will not pay the fine no consent given...i several times said no consent in all emails sent. 60 days later the officer WHO IS A TRAFFIC COP (CONFLICT OF INTEREST??)TELLS ME HE CANT DEERMINE BETWEEN ME AND THE OFFICER WHOS RIGHT SO WE HAVE TO GO TO COURT ..BUT I GAVE NO FUCKIN CONSENT HOW THE FUCK CAN THIS STILL STAND ??
giroyagetme 3 months ago
@giroyagetme did you sign the tcket?and make sure you dont get tricked into the court case being lible on you make sure they are taking you to court and its them starting the prosess...if you signed the ticket then there isnt really much you can do now ,unless you where made to sign it under duress ,like you feared for your safety in anyway ...no victim no crime so remenber dont sign
reksub10 2 months ago
@reksub10 'No victim no crime'? Well that is completely wrong. There need be no 'injury' or 'victim'. I would argue that society in general is victimized by a speeding driver who could at any moment crash his car and ruin a person's life. Regardless, LexisNexis Legal Dictionary: "Crime: a wrong punishable by the state usually involving an actus reus and mens rea." At no point need there be an injury or victim. As a law student I can say these people are wrong and have misled you all.
michaeltbear 2 months ago
@michaeltbear were not saying theyre right were saying your system is pish and corrput to the bone theres no denying that and we want the republic back we have been holding in law society cant be hurt as its a fiction ,so who is the side thats misleading ,the side that takes us to court at the barrel of a gun or the ones who have the people interest instead of profit scince the advocates rotted it all to the core and your learning to make a living from telling lies all day ,,good luck with that
reksub10 2 months ago
@michaeltbear So what about if I get Summons to appear in "Criminal Court" for an "Open Container"? I've eaten up dozen's of those cases with this guy's information. Hell, I got another Open Container case in January which I only ask 2 questions:
1) Is the cop who made the complaint claiming personal injury or harm from me drinking a 24 oz of budweiser?
2) Are the "PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK" claiming personal injury or harm from me drinking a 24 oz of budweiser?
TheProverbialHater 2 months ago
@michaeltbear As a law student I think you might not want to drink all the B.A.R. Kool-Aid. It might taste good and be wrapped in a nice package, but it's still just coloring, water, and sugar. All I'm saying is what this guy saying is right I've used it and haven't paid a fine for speeding in a car or drinking in public aka Open Container in about 8 years.
DUI's you're right there need not to be a victim or injury. Everything else no injury "Criminal" or damages "civil" NO crime.
TheProverbialHater 2 months ago
@michaeltbear no you are dead wrong, no victim no crime, you system is the other group of terrorists, police commit more than 50% of the burglarliesand or conduct through street criminals, judges police and insurance industry are frauding poolsof billions, we need to bring all of you to justice all assets you hold belong to those of us you have frauded and stolen from. it is time for a legitimate system where the victicms are reimbursed from loses and we prosecute for injuries
chris532008 2 months ago
@chris532008 Not to mention sanitizing crimes for the worst criminals:PEDOPHILES and other child abusers; they've been repeated connected to DRUG DEALERS as well!
The DEA is a TURF protection/ SLAVE racket with police and fire providing cover.
(Senator Schaefer RIP!)
UnoRaza 1 month ago
Marc have you ever taken your arguments to appeals and higher ?
automan1223 3 months ago
adventuresinlegalland is now a Japanese language financial page.
jimpeel 4 months ago
FUCK OUR GOVERNMENT!!!!
Joshuahasbrouck 4 months ago in playlist More videos from Tactikalguy1 2
@Joshuahasbrouck then move to china bitch
hawaiiankillahulua 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Please don't listen to this guy! He will absolutely get you put in jail if you think for a minute his info is accurate. Nowhere in criminal law will you find that a harm must be done. I think he is confused with civil law where a plaintiff is suing a defendant for damages.
mikeinwtby 4 months ago
The courts can only hear cases and controversies. A valid cause of action is mandatory for a court to hear a case. There's two elements to a valid cause of action. 1) the violation of a legal right (life, liberty, property, etc) and 2) injury.
Also, every time the State is the plaintiff there can be no fair trial because the judge is paid by the plaintiff/State. There's a conflict of interest. Imagine a contested divorce wherein your mother in law was the judge -- a conflict of interest.
zonsb 4 months ago 30
@zonsb Has anyone used this argument and won over drugs like pot?
I'd think one of those tickets would be a good candidate for this tactic.
UnoRaza 1 month ago
@UnoRaza The judge is the legal expert so he's not going to allow a novice to show him up. It's most important to know how to question the cop/witness at trail and question the judge. You may ask your question at the forum at marcstevens(DOT)net -- where there's ample room for a dialog.
zonsb 1 month ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Law is not philosophy. Law is what actually happens in court, not what random people like this guy think ought to happen.
MidnightWins2 4 months ago
Our system works OJ and Casey Anthony are free! No crime was committed! Hire her attorney.
SuperKahones 4 months ago
It's a crime to be living! Our government is a joke!
SuperKahones 4 months ago
@GoodGodManGrowAPair your mom would be breaking the law and she could go to jail. she cant even have a bullet in her home. Pellet guns ok bows ok .
Was your mom trying to over throw the Goverment.
I am like your mom a felon over WEED. FIVE YEARS PROBATION. felon for the rest of my life. WEED.
Whent to a lawer to see if some thing could be done about never being able to own a weopen again.
The lawyer said. NO
I wasnt trying to over throw the Goverment. Caused no harm. victimless
roar5952 4 months ago
Nobody is ever tried in court for a "crime," they are tried for "felonies" and "misdemeanors." Some call those "crimes" but the court system does not officially define them that way. That is why this blowhard is wrong, why he never wins any cases, and why this video is just the propagation of a scam.
galathonredd 4 months ago
SADLY... everybody I know who has tried Marc's method has LOST. If you "win" there will be no record, but I would like to hear testimony of "success" with his approach.
SuperPucker 4 months ago
Government is men and women providing services at the barrel of a gun. There is no principle-agent relationship. Taxes are compulsory. Pay up or go to jail. They don't represent you. They own you. Government has no voluntary support.
zonsb 5 months ago 46
@zonsb may I quote you?
CzarThePlezer 3 months ago
@CzarThePlezer For the top comment, Marc gets credit. The comment beneath that you can quote me on.
zonsb 3 months ago
@zonsb Well put
SocietyIncollapse 1 month ago
@zonsb maybe ur government owns u. but im free and i pay them so, i own them.
Time2RebelNOW 1 month ago
@Time2RebelNOW First, it's not my government. Second, you admit to paying for government-criminals to rob the populace. Thus, you tacitly admit to being complicit in their plunder of hundreds of millions of people. You even go so far as to say you own them -- own the liars, thieves and killers.
zonsb 1 month ago
@zonsb ok let me take that back i did pay them, before i knew. and not me personally owning them but the people owning them. they work for us.
Time2RebelNOW 1 month ago
fake law for morons.
MmmmYeahSure 5 months ago
Corpus Delicti - the body of evidence that constitute the offence; the objective proof that a crime has been committed.
Princeton University
Notice nothing in the definition about any 'harm'.
RetSquid 5 months ago
This guy is a philosphy major, not a criminology major. Good luck taking his advice.
mitchellphillips23 5 months ago
So, the only way, under trust law, for them to be able to charge the trust is to get the authorization from the beneficiary us, and the only way for them to benefit from their charge is to get us to switch roles from beneficiary to trustee and for them to switch their role from trustee to beneficiary because no party can be both, at the same time. They must somehow trick us into accepting the role of trustee. Why would we do so when the trust is for our benefit?
TheMarcusMark 5 months ago
If you don't like the law, vote to change it and lobby your legislature. It is a crime because it is what the people have voted it to be. This "corpus delecti" stuff is fun for academia but is pretty much worthless in real life. Attorneys wouldn't argue this b/c they would be laughed out of court.
mikeknight4u 5 months ago
Is said property registered with the state proporty offical, and if so does that alone give them the right (under their system) to have control of your property and the usage there of? So what of other charges or other violations they will come up with. Let's not forget ordinances, and some of the other 2.5 million laws and regs. Not avocating the gov but we really need an order for sovereignty of representation. An organization for a new society perhaps.
flbech12 6 months ago
He makes a huge mistake. First off, I think he's right, but only because I know that marijuana is harmless. But let's just pretend the DEA is right and weed is harmful. Then there is indeed no victim. Yet. But as soon as that pot is harvested and smoked, there will be one. Something is a crime if there is a victim, or if there WILL be one. Otherwise, you could use his arguments for growing coke too, or even building a nuclear warhead.
nade486 6 months ago
@nade486
you are right,but until he does harvest and sells or smokes it ,there is no victim nor a crime,therefore he can not be prosecuted and no even the fact that there might be a victim down the road is not a crime,simple because this isnt the minory report,future victims do NOT count,at least not yet
Hoschi0913 6 months ago
@Hoschi0913 So it's cool with you if I build a nuke as long as I don't blow anything up with it?
kmmeerts 6 months ago
@kmmeerts
sure i dont have no problem with it at all,as long as it doesnt harm no one,like with the radioactive crap in there,you can have 1000's of them,but if something goes wrong with them your on the hook ;)
Hoschi0913 6 months ago
its on your property ,therefore none of my business whatsoever
Hoschi0913 6 months ago
I don't think he knows what corpus dilicti is.
TheEodtch 6 months ago
I had a pubic defender tell me that constitutional law does not uphold in a county court.
hornywhitehottie 7 months ago
crime /kraɪm/ [krahym]
–noun
1. an action or an instance of negligence that is deemed injurious to the public welfare or morals or to the interests of the state and that is legally prohibited.
2. criminal activity and those engaged in it: to fight crime.
3. the habitual or frequent commission of crimes: a life of crime.
DavidtheMarine 7 months ago
AND THE TRUTH SHALL SET US FREE
LoveVanillaRose 8 months ago
@LoveVanillaRose and education, knowledge, info... most valuable commodity is information ©Gekko
MrEurgbp 8 months ago
@paulagloria, No I don't know marc personally nor do I know his sucess rate? How he wins is simple really , a court of inferior jurisdiction, ie not a supreme court, has to have four elements to give it jurisdiction. A plaintiff or complaintant, a defendant, subject matter jurisdiction and a competent fact witness. In almost all instances, it lacks one or more of these elements
Go look up a man named Richard Cornforth, he explains it best!!
unclefixer 8 months ago
Well, folks, this looks like it. I mean, fuck "law school" and "college". All those "professionals" don't know anything. Clearly, only this uneducated man on YouTube knows the law.
MidnightWins2 8 months ago
@MidnightWins2 You make accusations that this man is uneducated. Now show proof.
Study the law, start with maxims, and wake up.
gorgeousdzastr 7 months ago
@gorgeousdzastr I can't say whether or not he is educated, but I know for certain he is not educated in the law based on the fact that he misunderstands what the Corpus Delicti is. He also says it's nonsense that a legal right could belong to an entire community, but it's actually very sensible. A park, for example, is public property. That means it belongs to the community. If someone damages the park, they have violated the rights of the community that holds it, as opposed to one individual.
thegreatfish 5 months ago
@thegreatfish ...im thinking he says it is non-sense that a legal right could belong to an entire community....because legal rights are INDIVIDUALLY ESTABLISHED ON SOVEREIGHNTY.......and if they were 'community/govt' based.....then each individuals interpretation would be different and thus incapable of being upheld...and then a selective few probably ends up claiming what 'majority rules' mean...and good chance that is something that can pay its way to making the 'laws/rules'.not representative
EntouchNetwork 5 months ago
@EntouchNetwork Actually it's just the opposite. When every individual gets to define their own rights, then you have too many interpretations to be upheld. When the community agrees on rights held by that community, then it becomes manageable. Also, the sovereignty of communities has been well established in history, whether it be nations, states, or cities. Communities have a long history of claiming sovereignty. Just look at the U.S.A. when the Colonies declared independence from England.
thegreatfish 5 months ago
@thegreatfish ...we never achieved independence from England.....it was a lie.....
EntouchNetwork 5 months ago
@EntouchNetwork That's not relevant. The point is that communities have been claiming sovereignty AS communities for hundreds of years, so for Marc to claim community rights are nonsense shows his lack of understanding about law. Also the fact that he is incorrectly defining the Corpus Delicti.
thegreatfish 5 months ago
@thegreatfish my take on it is he seems VERY INTELLIGENT...i'd ask him if i were you...as he seems to make EXTREMELY VALID points overall and has won a number of cases...and in terms of incorrectly definining??...doesnt law boil down to INTERPRETATION and PERCEPTION...they have MADE UP fraud consistently along the way.....i have an lawyer as an attorney and remember him emphatically saying..."they make it up along the way ...as they go!" SO WELL SAID.
EntouchNetwork 5 months ago
@EntouchNetwork I have spoken with him, and he has not won any cases as far as I can tell. I went on his message board and pointed out that the only cases people ever post are cases where he lost, and no one had yet posted a single case where he won. I asked him to provide at least one example of him winning and he deleted my posts from the board instead. Marc is just a shyster who feeds people this fantasy that he can win any case so he can get your money.
thegreatfish 5 months ago
@thegreatfish and from my INTERPRETATION of Corpus Delicti....he is NOT defining it incorrectly. THERE IS NO CRIME......just as he says....look it up!!! "The prosecution in a criminal case has the burden of proving EACH ELEMENT of a crime in order to secure a conviction. " ....there IS NO CRIME!
EntouchNetwork 5 months ago
@EntouchNetwork He believes the corpus delicti is used to determine if a law is valid. That is improper. The test of corpus delicti is used to determine if the crime being accused has actually been committed. In otherwords, corpus delicti would not be used to determine if growing marijuana is a crime, it would be used to determine if someone has been growing marijuana. The determination of whether growing marijuana can be a crime is done under a due process test, not corpus delicti.
thegreatfish 5 months ago
@thegreatfish you rights are infinite. You've signed applications with a corp pretending to be the gov. The applications are contracts wherein you assign (lol didn't know huh) the state to be your attorney in fact and becaome a ward and incompentent. They then multiply the power by transmitting it to various agencies through reciprocal agreements theat bind you.
That all the statutes rare: CONTRACTS activated by YOUR ACTION which allows them to claim JURISDICTION through CONSENT.
Simple.
VerifiedNews 4 months ago
@thegreatfish ...not representative of INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY.....which of course would make it non-sense....this is how we got our current state...of fraudulent gov't....thus he consistently states "govt's are established to protect and maintain..INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS"
EntouchNetwork 5 months ago
@MidnightWins2 Sounds like you would leave your fate and rights in the hands of those who purport to be the "real" experts. (i.e. lawyers, judges, law professors, etc.) I'm certainly not saying law education and practice is "wrong" or worthless. But the point here is that we all must wake up and deal with the fact that the legal system is taking our rights and freedoms a little more every day, mostly because of our ignorance, and the selfish motivations of our opponents.
gintherlover 7 months ago
YOU STONER
xoxlolgamegodlolxox 8 months ago
It's a victimless crime. the victim is society itself. much like prostitution and such.
darnoc698 8 months ago
@darnoc698 And under common law, it is NOT unlawful as long as there is consent. Under common law, there must be a victim, and the state can not be a victim.
gorgeousdzastr 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
my understanding is much more simple....proof of a crime is malice aforethought or malicious intent. No malice, no crime. As many people say, no harm no foul.
adfox1nf 8 months ago
my understanding is much for simple....proof of a crime is malice aforethought or malicious intent. No malice, no crime. As many people say, no harm no foul.
adfox1nf 8 months ago
What countries does corpus delicti apply to, is it just the US under the constitution?
Of is it alot more countries.
ratsallik 8 months ago
It is really this simple. Fact of injury, loss, or harm? Not giving identification to a police officer is not a crime. People making up their own rules and causing violence to you even, if they are public employees, is a crime. Sue them!
Michaelwiseguy 8 months ago
so should i grow skunk or indica? lol good info.
2skullscrushing 8 months ago
Who thinks he looks like Sean Hannity?
ArizonaPublic 9 months ago
what a retard.
ridexit69 9 months ago
go to jail for not doing jury duty? lol untrue. i throw those things away every time and not even so much as a phone call about it.
cyberpsygen7 9 months ago
@cyberpsygen7 I believe he said they "threaten" you, which they do. Whether or not they carry it out is another matter all its own.
BahamutElDiablo 7 months ago
why do my posts not show up?
txflyguy40 9 months ago
Just to let the youtube world know. I went to my court hearing demanded My inalienable rights, common law jurisdiction, and voided a divorce deree all in one notice. The hearing was then backed out of the court docket. Three weeks later a get an "Order" in the mail saying the case is dissmissed. Funny thing is they State refered to me as an attorney of which I never said I was nor claimed to be. what goof balls.
txflyguy40 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@txflyguy40 I would like to know more about this!
delquattro 9 months ago
@txflyguy40 inalienable rights? I think you mean unalienable rights?
rofl
inalienable is privileges that can be revoked.
But I got your point here..
gorgeousdzastr 7 months ago
@gorgeousdzastr Not that funny. So they made a mistake? Help them by correcting them and be on your way...
BahamutElDiablo 7 months ago
@BahamutElDiablo Did I not correct the mistake all in good humor? Did I criticize anyone?
gorgeousdzastr 7 months ago
@gorgeousdzastr I guess in my perspective, you came off asinine. If that wasn't your intent then I apologize.
BahamutElDiablo 7 months ago
@BahamutElDiablo Apology accepted, cheers
we're good...
gorgeousdzastr 7 months ago
Also he says that Prohibition was repealed because people wouldn't convict. Not true. Or at least only partly true. If people failed to convict bar owners and liquor suppliers, it was, in most cases, because they valued their lives and knew that guys like Al Capone would be pissed. Prohibition was repealed because it was a failure. People like to drink. People were sick of the corruption and violence that it created. .
mapache11 9 months ago
I'm not a lawyer, so won't argue his views of crime vs tort. I will argue his opinion that the jury system is flawed because people are forced to serve. A criminal has a right to be judged by his peers. People often do things only if a) the consequence is good or b) the consequence of NOT doing it is bad. No government has the $ to pay people their salaries while they are on jury duty. So the alternative is a threat.
mapache11 9 months ago
EXCELLENT.....YOUR ONLY GUILTY IF YOU AGREE TO BE THE GUILTY PARTY.
YOU CAN CONTRACT ALLTHE WAY UP TO SENTENCING AND SIMPLY SAY
"I DO NOT CONSENT" continue to say this and not contrct to a sentence and your out of there. No contract no crime.
MrRiceowlex 10 months ago
@MrRiceowlex You can say "I object" but you better off saying "I do not consent" I object might lead to other liable dialogue. Just say I do not consent" to any sentencing, and you'll avoid the trap.
MrRiceowlex 10 months ago
@MrRiceowlex no,no, not like that, a bit more complex.
Also pending what the "charge" is or if you are compelled to perform.
GnosticNinja 10 months ago
This man is smart I no thi has nothin to do with. This but what can I do abt this ok so all the time I go walking at like 9:00pm and the cops stop me and say tht I can not walk past 9:00pm I'm not Doin nothing wrong and they still tell me tht they will take me in if I keep doing it what is the crime for walking u tell me thts like me telling u tht u cant eat
kodye414 10 months ago
Marc Stevens is an idiot.
missdasiycook 10 months ago
@missdasiycook How is he an idiot ?
MrRiceowlex 10 months ago
Did you actually try this excuse in court.. and if so did it work.. ( and how much marijuana did you actually have)
badpanda84 10 months ago
LOL that still doesn't stop the cops for arresting you though.. that excuse would never hold it caught..
badpanda84 10 months ago
@DeathDude72 : Read Rousseau through Rawls and get the hell away from these jokes. They don't have a community college understanding of natural philosophy, much less an authoritative grasp.
To the rest of you: disregard anyone's comments but bigyellowism. I am a lawyer, and these other crackpot theories and ignorance will screw you should you rely on them.
@babycanaryyellin : Just because the cops let one nut off instead of dealing with his bullshit does not make the position legal.
jahastings3 10 months ago
@jahastings3 Funny you use "theory" with "crackpot" but not "crackpot" with "law", because they BOTH are theories. However.. you must be talking about someone who "understands" those colorful "statutes and codes" that has the "force of law" but are NOT Law. The words "Color of law", is how you are memorizing everyone to think it is actual Law. Are you saying there is no such thing as LAW or color of law? Or are you saying there is NO difference?
What say you Mr. Lawyer?
gorgeousdzastr 7 months ago
What I wanna know is who are these people that made the state? Who was "Og"'s grandfather that said "work or die"? WHY do we have to work in order to live a comfortable life? The question I've asked over and over again is who are these people that control us and everything we do?
DeathDude72 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
here's another and more potent arguement.. Genesis 1:29.. what God gave to man, man cannot take away.. "Congress shall make no Law respecting the establishment of Religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.." in a nutshell..
Dewdaahman 10 months ago
This guy is an agent. He is not telling that if you are a 14th and 15th amendment citizen, the judge still has jurisdiction over you. Unless you declare a Sovereign.
polylingue 11 months ago
A crime is a misdemanor or a felony. Can you explain civil infraction? What is the rule to that? I heard cause of action but I believe that is more of a tort in civil cases where the state isn't the plaintiff.
VietBoi503 11 months ago
ok, have fun in jail...
alfacrase 11 months ago
This is my definition of LAW Something that was created once and can never be changed. Examples: If you jump off a cliff your gonna fall (gravity), When your born your gonna die no gettin around it (death), If you touch fire your gonna get burned (hot)
tza420 11 months ago
My point is: Learn the law before you go into the courtroom- and fight smart- If you want to change the law, go to the legislature. Or you can use this crap and end up doing more time...If this worked, then everyone would do it. A little knowledge is dangerous, especially when your own liberty is at stake. I'm not defending the system, and sometimes you can win, but not with this. Good Luck!
alfacrase 1 year ago
@alfacrase YES you can WIN -- I direct you to video 'RIGHT to TRAVEL not DRIVE, FREEMAN" to see winning against 'law' in action.
You are just wrong & appear to find it easier to embrace your brainwashed ficticious cage, than do the work to be FREE.
Worse, you perpetuate your own brainwashed dangerous fictition by actually spreading your disease to others. It'd be more honest and wiser to STFU
BabyCanaryYelllin 11 months ago
@BabyCanaryYelllin couldn't say it better myself....
EasyEbookMan 11 months ago
doug flutie grows marijuana?? wtf
TWOhits6 1 year ago
@bigyelowism a tort is a civil wrong , having an accident, unintentionally harming someone, and yes there can be a criminal charge with torts. What Marc is trying to explain is that the state is a fiction and can no more be harmed than Willy Coyote in a cartoon. When the state tries, to call something a crime, it is infact the breaking of a statue or code, there is no real injured party The state simple wants to steal and control someone else, and they do cause harm to real people.
unclefixer 1 year ago 16
@unclefixer There doesn't have to be an injured party for conduct to amount to a crime. Tort requires loss/harm, and I think that's where he gets his wires crossed. Saying that a crime is a wrong against the state is just another way of saying that a crime is conduct that the legislature (who are elected representatives of the people) think is injurious to society in general. We can't just go making up our own definitions of 'crime'. Fiction or not, the state's in a better position to define it
bigyellowism 11 months ago
@unclefixer I hate cops, and love the idea of loopholes.... show me an example of this subject matter working for a marijuana grower and I may listen...
soberindothan 10 months ago
@unclefixer do you know Marc and what is his success rate?
paulagloria 8 months ago
@unclefixer Don't jump to those conclusions too quickly. A fiction can still be harmed. The most common example is a corporation. While not a living being or a concrete object, a corporation is still an entity that may be harmed in the form of monetary loss. If you rob a bank, you would not be stealing from any person individually, but you would still be stealing from a corporation, which represents many individual's interests. A state is essentially the same, representing an entire community.
thegreatfish 5 months ago
@thegreatfish I think the rebuttal to this notion would be the fact that the corporation is a legal fiction in itself. In a stateless society the corporation would not exist. Responsibility would fall on the owner. This means any harm to come to the bank would be harm to the owner or his property not the collective group or corporation. At least this is my understanding of it currently. ;)
neue01 4 months ago
@neue01 I'm not so sure this would be true. A corporation is really nothing more than a group of people who have decided to invest in a common business. While it's true that a corporation probably wouldn't be afforded the same legal breaks in a stateless society, I can't see why a group of people couldn't pool their money and start their own business. I think identifying the fiction as a party, like a state or corporation, is just easier than trying to individually identify each member.
thegreatfish 4 months ago
Well said =)
DamionTheReal666 1 year ago
The jails are full of guys like this...
alfacrase 1 year ago
@alfacrase Your point is to: stop fighting? or fight even harder?
seraphimra 1 year ago
here is better advice: don't talk to the police. and legislature can define crime.
clydewmorgan 1 year ago
Mr./Ms. black, He may have a few good points, but at the same time I can disagree. I dont have to like all of his logics, thats with anyone. If you blindly follow someone just because its what people,media tells you to, and bashing people who dont follow, you are being "contolled"
boots13100 1 year ago
@boots13100 Mr. ..thank you. Ture you dont have to , never said you did.
black9897 1 year ago
@boots13100 cant stay away ha?
boots13100 1 year ago
Never said it didn't, but just cuz it's done bad doesn't mean it's not great. Our Republic benefits everyone. Just giving an ex. of marc Stevens logic, which you seem to like.
black9897 1 year ago
Of course not. and no one is "controlling me" cuz i don't break the law. If you don't like the laws we live by then you are free to leave America (i.e the greatest nation on earth). but as long as you do you must obey the rules that have been established. No society can function with no law, what you get without gov and laws/rules is chaos/anarchy..now if thats what you want then ok, but I will fight against you everytime.
black9897 1 year ago
@black9897 spoken like A true Amerikkkan.
boots13100 1 year ago
@boots13100 It's actually spelled "American" Another prob is anarchy can lead to a totalitarian or communist society. I don't want that nor anarchy. I love our Republic. If I ever see Marc Stevens, you or any of his "followers" getting robbed, attacked, etc, I'll be sure to not call the cops or help, I'll "volunteer" to not help.
black9897 1 year ago
@black9897 You say Amerikkka is the best nation on earth like it never did any harm to anyone,but if it benifits you and your agenda its ok. And what does being attacked have to do with the comment??? If that was the case Ill fight back like any normal person would (if threatened) everyones not as cowardly as most people, and some of us do think for our selves.
boots13100 1 year ago
@black9897 Total Government leads to communism, fascism, totalitarianism and any other form of statism. The biggest crimes against humanity have occured under government NOT anarchy. The cops by law are not there to protect you they are simply law enforcement. If you want protection hire someone who depends on you staying alive, private security.
DemiosOctavo 1 year ago
@DemiosOctavo Yes I know. but having none can also pave the way to that by having someone step in..kinda like hitler. so? anarchy is still bad. I know that, but if it requires to protect you then they will.
black9897 1 year ago
I LOVE YOU MAN!!!......WWWAAAAAY LOVE YOU !!ROCK ON...PLEEEEASE KEEP SPREADING THIS TRUTH !!
6613261604
IF I CAN HELP IN ANYWAY !
bakersfieldmusicnow 1 year ago
the government causes you harm, injury and loss!!!
a41dog 1 year ago
Just cuz you think it's not a crime or it only is if someone gets hurt n what not, doesn't mean you're right. The law says different. Plenty of things can be crimes without someone getting hurt.
No one listen to this anarchist.
black9897 1 year ago
@black9897 can you explain? and remember that "the law" is only a bunch of opinions written on paper.
Ctupper1990 1 year ago
@Ctupper1990 well it's what we go by, we have to have law. don't like it move. Spitting on the sidewalk is a public health code violation (class 4 misdemeanor in my state) a bit silly but it's still part of the law.
black9897 1 year ago
@black9897 "what we go by" are you telling me that if you did not have cops controlling you then you would be running a muck and harming others?
"don't like it move" other than the use of violence how can you justify such a condescending statement? is this your earth?
Ctupper1990 1 year ago
hello my name is tina i had a ticket for 15 over the speeding limit its it possible to get out of this ticket if i try to fight it?
tina5712 1 year ago
It's not your property, so they can do whatever they want. You're just renting the property, you're just a tenant on the land, look at your colorable deed. They do and will make any law they want and if you break it you can go to jail because you have a contract agreeing to all this and don't even know it.
When you say Constitution which one are you referring to? There are three you know?
Peace
Curiosity63 1 year ago
Comment removed
maverick10241 1 year ago
@maverick10241 ...... Sounds like you believe you already lost. I dont care what they do. I care about what I do. I show they are breaking the law and taking up to the court. If the court does the same, I add them as defendants as well. Just cuz no one is doing it, doesnt mean it cant be done. Besides, its more money for you since nobody is doing it. One man can change a states laws if he chooses to.It just takes time. Something that most dont have.
Tactikalguy1 1 year ago
you is forgetting the crimes against you as a innocent law-abiding citizen until these uniform arrived, smashed my property and stole my property so who's the victim in this?? you are!!!
who's innocent and who's guilty of treason, war crimes, and crimes against you and the rest of mankind?? It aint you for growing plants but them for trashing your freedoms and unlawfully attacking you and your property!!!
a41dog 1 year ago
@a41dog WRONG LOSER.... IT IS YOU FOR ILLEGALLY GROWING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES. HOPE YOU ENJOY THE GANG RAPE IN THE PRISON SHOWER.
Snakeeater436 1 year ago
Corpus delicti (plural: corpora delicti) (Latin: "body of crime") is a term from Western jurisprudence which refers to the principle that it must be proven that a crime has occurred before a person can be convicted of committing the crime. For example, a person cannot be tried for larceny unless it can be proven that property has been stolen.
GarySherborne 1 year ago
what is corporate electi//th
weapons33 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I have free information on fighting tickets of all kinds.Did you know you can charge an officer with assult with a deadly weapon. contact me at davesevaw@gmail.com. I have paid over a grand getting this information but I will share it for free. We need to expose this scam. Unless you are in the act of commerce traffic violation dont pertain to you.
davesevaw 1 year ago
bullshit...if they say its a crime, they will bang u up.....simple........
HOMEnHIGH 1 year ago
absolute truth
Janet6961 1 year ago
Crime is anything, what it's illegal by a law.
metal87power 1 year ago
I don't see why the idea of a community of people having rights is nonsense, as Marc states at the beginning of his video. If a community of people want to reserve specific rights for themselves, like the right to freedom of speech, or even the right to live, then I believe they should be able to, and I also believe they should be allowed to instate a judicial system to make sure those rights are preserved for the people of the community. Why does Marc hate having rights so much?
ThisIsTheRealSkinny 1 year ago
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny He believes in rights he just doesn't think the emphasis should be on "communal rights".
DaveDoggOwns 1 year ago
@ThisIsTheRealSkinny The rights you refer to are individual rights, not community rights. Besides that, governments are instituted to insure protections of the rights of the individual. A group or community should not be afforded rights superior to those of the individual due to the risks of abuse that would guarantee.
OverTaxed42Long 1 year ago
@OverTaxed42Long A right that belongs to every member of the community would be a community right. A right that belongs to one person is an individual right. The right to step on my property is individual because only I have that right. Right to live is a community right, because everyone in the community has it. Generally, they are in balance with each other. Marc doesn't believe we should afford equal rights to all members of the community. He prefers a voluntary system.
ThisIsTheRealSkinny 1 year ago
another howard stern
tweeners88 1 year ago
I hope you're licensed to provide legal advice. They'll getcha!
websslinger 1 year ago