Nassim Haramein 4/45

[Nameless1324]

well i suppose its your opinion, and i cant change so ,you know believe what you want to

[justincgs]

KOOK!

[ikemkrueger]

0:40 For all the fractal fans, there is the nice program called XaoS. Google for it!

[ebmstudios]

I am just curious , if bobathon ET AL are correct , why are they trolling videos on you tube instead of taking their arguments to Nassim himself ? After all it is not like he is not accessible . I've e-mailed and gotten prompt responses myself and I am the epitome of no one . It just seems strange.....

[FOLlove]

Thank you Nassim

[Piticli0969]

3:55 "If there is an infinite amount of particles in it that can be divided, that means it has infinite mass". What a stupid affirmation. why can't you divide the mass as well?

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 Why would you? well infinite particles multiplied by the mass of any particle gives us infinite mass.

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 A proton has finite mass. That is proven. If you divide it to the infinity, the mass of the resulting particles will have zero mass. That is my point, why doesn't he divide the mass?

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 what he's saying is that protons don't have finite mass, that within everything that we perceive to be finite lies infinity, therefore nothing has a definite mass or size everything is infinitely large and infinitely small

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 Proton does have a mass of 1.672621777×10−27 kg [wikipedia]. That is a fact.

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 Okay there's a few things id like to point out here, 1 is that people seem to blindly believe that when a ''proper'' scientist tells them a proton has a mass, that it does, however this man says it doesn't and everyone calls them mental, 2 your completely missing what he's saying, so I'll reiterate, HE IS NOT DIVIDING THE MASS OF ANYTHING BE IT PROTONS, ELECTRONS OR CHEESE NIBLETS. HE IS MULTIPLYING, You must imagine that every one of those triangles has the same mass, 3 wikipedia?

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 Regarding point 1: At some point you have to start believing what the majority of people says, expecially if it can be proved. Otherwise you get crazy. I've never been to South Africa but I do believe that place exist because I know people who have been there. I haven't measured the proton mass by myself but there are countless scientific teams in the world who did. So I do believe them. Oh wait, may be they are part of a scientific conspiracy, but then you become schizophrenic.

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 I'm not saying you shouldn't believe what's proven ,what I'm saying is you shouldn't immediately disregard all that is not, and to respond to the scientific conspiracy stuff, I find alot of ''mainstream'' science to be stupid ''we cant prove what's holding our universe together, and if we don't our theories are bullshit and we lose our funding'' ''oh its dark matter, cant see measure or prove it, but its dark matter'' maybe they're corrupt maybe not, doesn't matter its bullshit

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 Yeah, I agree with you in this one. There are a lot of unconfirmed theories for unexplained things in the Universe (including dark matter). However, any theory is immediately rejected when it contradicts observational evidence. That is my issue on the proton mass. But anyway, assuming he's got a point, why he doesn’t get any credit in the scientific community? Don't tell me all the scientists are narrow-minded.

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 I think its probably because if he did get any credit then the ''mainstream'' (hate that word) scientists would have rewrite a-lot of their own literature something they don't like doing,

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 I disagree. Scientific community is extremely diverse. They love to have their theories/laws challenged with anything that can better explain nature. I'm not a physicist but I believe this guy doesn't get credit simply because is just talking shit. The fact that he runs that "resonance project" money-making machine with "emissary programs" at $3200 tuition fee just reaffirms my opinion.

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 Regarding point 2: Okay he is multiplying whatever triangles, so what? Does that mean that the proton has infinite mass again?

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 yes, if you call that outer boundary a proton, and inside that boundary there is an infinite amount of these triangle particles, these particles all have the same mass, then no matter how large or small this mass is, the amount of mass contained inside the boundary is infinite, like he said in his first video there is a certain amount of re-wiring that needs to be done, and at first it seems counter intuitive but eventually you see its just logical

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 Something that seems logical doesn't mean is true. Kepler was convinced that the orbits of the planets followed the five Pythagorean solids boundaries. That seemed logical too, however didn't match observations. He eventually rejected his theory and came up with a new one in agreement with reality. That's how science progresses.

[Nameless1324]

@Piticli0969 you see you always have to ask exactly WHOS logic these things are based on, i mean we observe something to be finite logical then to assume it has a definite mass, by this guys logic not the case. science also progresses by rejecting old established ideas, if you rely on the knowledge of your forecomers,call them laws, unbrekable laws, and then only apply those laws to make deductions about everything no progress will be made.

[Piticli0969]

@Nameless1324 You were the one who said "he says logical things" not me. Laws can't be broken precisely because they are supported by evidence. They can be extended or replaced by another law that comprises smaller ones. When Einstein came up with relativity he didn't break Newton's law, he just extended for special cases. That is call SCIENCE, a heritage of proven laws. This guy comes with a theory that is opposing reality. Sorry, I can't buy that.

[xmenprince]

Is not infinite amount of mass is that 1 has inifinite mathematical parts, but in the end is just 1

[10100003]

Why the hate? He's essentially discussing chaos theory. The scale of it all depends on your current perspective. Check out videos on this site. To say his discussion is meaningless is  ridiculous. Steven Hawkins recent BBC series essentially says the same thing, which is the heart of the problem, this guy has gone at it in a now conventional route so he's a 'mystic' etc, If you gave the exact same presentation to Hawkins the comments section would be full of praise. LOL retarded IMO.

[TheBobathon]

@10100003 He's not discussing chaos theory at all. This has zero in common with anything Stephen Hawking has said.

Also: to say 'to say his discussion is meaningless is ridiculous' is silly :)

[10100003]

@TheBobathon  on what grounds? just because you say so? GL with that. O_o

[TheBobathon]

@10100003 ooh, a teenager! Hello.

[10100003]

@TheBobathon Thats the best you can do? Nonsensical gibberish? GL with that too. btw hows life in the circus?

[TheBobathon]

@10100003 I don't live in a circus. You're saying he's discussing chaos theory, and that Stephen Hawking says the same things as him? Tell me more. Give me quotes or times in the video and explain the connections.

[JEKAZOL]

Infinity within a confined area is not the whole universe - it's one infinite point. Extrapolating this on a concept doesn't prove anything. Scientists don't find fractals inside atoms do they? I like the connectedness principal, but there is no proof or high logic here behyond colourful opinions - well meaning as they are.

[monteithbarraxoets]

richtig !!!!!!



[deepin2itnah]

Any picture of the brain clearly shows the 2 lobes, and theres ton upon tons of findings on right and left brain function. Who's kidding who. You think the so called federal agencies (federal means absolutely nothing) who've approached NLP masters along w/ Dianetics whiz kids and others to work for them are fooling around? They know exactly what they're looking for from these disciplines______ Mind control tools. Check out Sigmund Freud's nephew---Eddie Bernay on you tube"Happiness Machines"

[Truthiracy1]

I have watched almost 40 minutes so far and only two things, dots, and geometry that is already known. All life comes from the EGG, the CIRCLE of the CELL, the circle hole of the female, the cave hole of all life that comes from the black chaos of the abyss. So draw a circle and then surround that circle with more circles so they all fit together side by side. You have created the very essence of all life that comes from the ONE circle. Kabbalah, Flower of Life, Geometry, Tree of life etc.

[deepin2itnah]

It's all about right brain, left brain synergy or the merging of the two lobes for the purpose of asension. At 5:40 in this segment he explains that quite succinctly. Meditation is the process by which that synergy can be obtained. He's telling you in no uncertain terms that he's using a right brain modality to balance his left brain leanings(analitical thinking). Anyone who does'nt understand this is at the wrong watering hole.

[steeltable218]

@deepin2itnah Sorry, but the 'split-brain' hypothesis you cite is an old myth, disproven by MRI scans and neurologicaal research over the past 20 years. Look it up. The brain's hemispheres work far more integrally than that. There's no need for conscious merging because this happens anyway. But we can look at things differently - rationally and analytically or metaphorically and abstractly. Each has a different motivation. The latter is unfit for objective science because it's subjective.

[deepin2itnah]

Here's what everyone has to remember: Once the atom was discovered everything changed. The very fact that it can be proven that atoms have no real discernable matter either, leads us to an absurdity-i.o.w." than what are we?"- Here's the payoff: The only other experience known where absurdities occur is in our DREAMS. Were dreaming we are here. By the way what is we????!!!!What do you think every prophet, holyman, seer, guru, shaman, medicine man, on and on has been trying to tell you. :540

[steeltable218]

up to 01:10 - this is simply the Koch Snowflake that Helge von Koch came up with in 1904, one of the earliest fractal curves, and it needn't be bounded by a circle to show infinite recursion.

[hammergio20]

infinite connectivity...WTF? People buy into this because it postulates that a universal "oneness" exists through pseudoscientific jibberjabber. Big ups to Nassim being able to sell this stuff to the masses, shame for misleading ppl.

[aaugoaa]

i think physics is beginning to realize this concept. scientists within this field know that the more they look into the something the more they find. they call this the expansion of the universe, from the big bang...but more enlightened physicist. such as David Bohm.and John Hagelin etc etc do realize what this really is.

[anitclothing]

WOW, too bad 90% of the people who posted didn't pay attention and let their left brain convince them to believe some regurgitated BS from textbooks. Its a shame so many people are like Cypher in the Matrix and would rather stay plugged in.

[TheBobathon]

@anitclothing so, that "left brain" cliche you just quoted... is that from a textbook? from some guy quoting a textbook? Or from personal experience - have you been dissecting the brains of the commenters? :)

[steeltable218]

@anitclothing Why do you think that people who embrace logic, reason, evidence and experience are in some way trapped? In cliched terms, are the left brain and poetic, abstract thinking of the right brain mutually exclusive? I don't think so, and yes, we may possibly much of what we find in modern textbooks may be mistaken, and we'll find it through more rigorous science, not the ravings of more dotty delusionals.

[Rimber6]

Considering you have an infinitely large puzzle.

You turn the centre piece around.

What happens.

[ggabe005]

we don't live forever or forever to vision infinity!!!

[stonedrenched]

Here he is equating infinity with the Buddhist notion of emptiness and he is correct that all sages insist that out of emptiness come all things...naturally our senses are limited in perception. He is explaining legitimate physics in a philosophical way for a specific audience. Sasaki Roshi Zen master teaches this same expansion-contraction today. His approach is intuitive - exactly as was Einstein's and any other creative scientist.

[gspradoneto]

"We fill the rocket with lots of fuel lots lots of fuel, then we put some people on top of it, then we lit the bottom and pray they will survive the explosion. that's our way" I LOOOLLLLEDDD

[aquarianrican]

BIGGEST & smallest simultaneously

[Zee96969696]

revelation, is it the appropriate word? this guy might be a real life genius, hope he make good contribution

[MrLamzo17]

This guy just ignore the basic rules of differential calculus. Curiously, he is able to see that an infinite sum of smaller and smaller volume (or area) finally fit in a finite volume (or area) but he is not able to see that an infinite sum of smaller and smaller mass finally fit in a finite mass. 2500 years before him Zenon make the same mistake, this is why this theory is not interesting. Anyway myself I believe that everything contain the whole...but he miss the point. This is not the way.

[Zee96969696]

@MrLamzo17 so you all say that ,e.g. 2 kilogram is not infinately massive, but it is only 2 kg, and it will stay 2kg? is that it? well, i guess that is true, or is it? probably is. this is too confusing for me, i admit

[aleimmicio]

fucking astonishiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiing yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa man you fukin blowed my mind thats was what i was looking for for yearssssssssssssssssssssss yeaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa­aaaaa

thank you thank you thank you thank you for shariiiiiiiiiiiiiiing that.

thats paradise!

[onefeather2]

Nassim is right and if people really listened to what he is saying they would start to get it. Life and the make up of this Univerise is a LOT more than the material part, it all works together but most people are so brainwashed by schools and media they cant even think for themselves much less reason about things.

[FRIENDLEYGUY]

what is wrong with u guys,,and gls ,, just cause u cant meditate,,,, channel and stuff,, u want 2 put him dwn ,,,ur acting like kids ,,,,,,dont u want 2 travel the universe??? well i do!!! hes just teaching something that hes reserched on,, and it s interesting ,,,, grow up and stop acting like the media,,,,pls

[carolnikkiperry]

I am skeptic about reaching a singularity within an infinite fractal. But following his logic, it's like turning around the dynamic of contaction/expansion. The inherent dynamic of such a thing would contain this fractal nature blue print. And furthermore, we can't overstepped the fundamental structure the vacuum. I think we must listen to him more than once to have a better idea of what he is saying. It's not as trivial as we could thought even it's not science.

[carolnikkiperry]

The dynamic particle generation is an interesting view that he exposes here. for those who know about the "Ummite's letters" they talk about IBOZOO UU. That is a similar concept but much more elaborated.

[Tempestni]

check out The Resonance Project

[Karma01010]

His paper was NOT PEER REVIEWED BY OTHER PHYSICISTS.

His paper is regarded as a pre-undergraduate level pile of nonsense.

Stop pretending.

[TZMSocialEvolution]

Those who place so much emphasis on official degrees as a means to justify mental expansion are simply programmed sheep obeying the mantra that you must PAY in order to learn. If you need a degree to justify your mental ability, then you're not worth the paper its printed on.

Self education is the pinnacle of human achievement, because no one is TELLING you to do it.

Lastly...once your paper wins an award based on peer review from other physicists, having a degree doesn't matter.

[indie3]

@syncro16se. Scientific theories have been spectacularly successful, making incredible progress in an incredibly short period - the last 150 years has been phenomenal, and it's speeding up all the time, the next 150 years will be even more spectacular for science (real science that is, not nassims puerile bullcrap)

Creationists? lmao!! Just plain dumb, nothing more needs to be said about them.

[BecauseItRocks]

This is not creationism.

[Karma01010]

i know. I was replying to syncro16e, who spoke of creationists.

[syncro16se]

The scientific theories must be inadequate if they can't explain the universe within ourselves, as he mentions, and those of us who have experienced it, anxciously await some "out of the box" thinking that we need to move forward.

The darwinists will call the others creationists.

I'd rather be a creationist than a darwinist, since, as all previous knowledge, it is proven to be wrong, and always overtaken by a new and better theory.

It's the scientific process.

[TheJellymeat]

Does this guy know about the planck length?

Or super string theory?

He sounds like he's on drugs and just making stuff up on the spot.

[BecauseItRocks]

Take the time to watch through the entire thing.

He explains much more than just this.

After all, it's 45 vids. :P

[indie3]

TinyCoconut's comparison of Haramein with Kent Hovind is very relevant. Both of them rely upon the ignorance of their intended audience, in Hovind's case ignorance of Biology and Genetics, in Harameins case, ignorance of Physics and Cosmology. And I agree that both should be in jail.

[syncro16se]

@indie3

There is free speech, and thus, jail is perhaps

a bit over the top ?

[kilikadork]

People like TinyCoconut should say something supporting their argument, BLAH.

[TheBobathon]

Haramein makes outrageous claims for himself and his theories with nothing to support his arguments, so expressing objection without bothering to set out a detailed argument seems like a fairly reasonable response.

[TinyCoconut]

People who lie about science should be put in jail.

This guy is a fraud on par with Kent Hovind.

[BecauseItRocks]

Care to explain?

[BecauseItRocks]

@TinyCoconut

"This guy is a fraud on par with Kent Hovind."

Please elaborate won't you?

Kent Hovind doesn't even have a degree in any form of science.

[TinyCoconut]

@BecauseItRocks

And this Mr. Harmein does? I've been looking for what educational qualifications he has, and from what institutions. I still can't determine what level of degree he has obtained, in what field, and from which accredited institution.

It seems he doesn't make that information very easy to find, even on his cult's own webpage.

My guess is he graduated from the university of Hemp with a bachelor's degree in shrooms.

No disrespect to shrooms, mind you. Fungi don't lie to people.

[BecauseItRocks]

@TinyCoconut

Very good point.

I'll check that out.

Hahahaha, I agree, Fungi don't lie, they inspire truth.

[Nameless1324]

@TinyCoconut prove he's lying

[ufoforreal2009]

When that is said, im allways open for new theorys and this guy has some very interessting points, i like the way he thinks out of the box. Thats a good thing ;)

[ufoforreal2009]

ok watched part 1,2,3,4, im not convinced my brain is just not thinking infinity. It has to be a start and an end, the alpha and omega.

I belive that there are many universes, not just our own and at the same time there has to be that first "seed" planted in nothing, grown into everything? the very first big bang if you like. many scientists also belives its like this. There is allways a beginning and therefor allways an end. Infinity works in math but not in physics.

[Karma01010]

You mean Collective Consciousness, not conscience, and no such thing exists.

[Tel750]

The point is, imagine and it will be, with the consultation of the collective conscience.

[bartalome]

I completely understand what he's trying to explain. . " Human beings are perceiver, but the world that they perceive is an illusion: an illusion created by the description that was told to them from the moment they were born. So in essence, the world that their reason wants to sustain is the world created by a description and its dogmatic and inviolable rules, which their reason learns to accept and defend. Don Juan

[octohorse]

the radiating part is what? I can't understand him. the contracting part is generating, did he say the radiating part is alienating? what?

[daisyroots]

yes indeed ...this concept is.... in essence so very simple...and it makes perfect sense. The kudos go to Nassim for making this material accessible to the lay person....but I am afraid that the camerman makes it quite clear that he has no grasp of the subject matter.

[FreeSoulz444]

People that try to debunk this guy are zombies that can't stand the light and will try anything from letting other zombies to be revived...now you can tell if your a zombie or not from your reaction to my comment...

[TheBobathon]

@FreeSoulz444 I'm a zombie! I'm a zombie! You made a little straw man, very good.

Sometimes people need to be debunked because they're talking sparkly sparkly nonsense that lures in those who don't know the first thing about the subject.

Truth is more precious than this. We should take ideas and investigate them, test them, think them through. It doesn't take much investigation to see that he's making this stuff up, manipulating people, and they're paying him to do it.

[BEERIOUS]

how is he doing these things? why are you so personally offended by this?

[TheBobathon]

I'm not personally offended at all. But I have very good reasons to believe that he has very little understanding of physics. He claims he is researching at the forefront of physics, and this research is the basis of his ideas. It's a lie.

A lot of people believe that his ideas are radical new truths emerging from real cutting-edge research, and he sells a lot of things on this basis, and he cultivates this image. This is blatantly manipulative.

I think it's good if people are aware of this.

[aritos67]

i think that that the current economic situation in south korea has nothing to do with the devaluation of the atomic structure within the caniferous valves found inside your arse

[dasgroover]

1.616252(81)×10−35 meters

what is the 'something' that is relative to ratioπ

at that level

?

[indie3]

In abstract mathematical terms we can infinitely divide a boundary, or an object. But in the real world, however, we know that when we get down to Quantum or Planck scales it starts to become indeterminate and fuzzy i.e. NOT SELF_SIMILAR to larger scales, thus not fractal.

Infinite fractals make for beautiful math, thanks to Benoit Mandelbrot and other brilliant mathematicians. What nassim ignores is the fact that infinitely dividing fractals physically fail when they hit the quantum scale.

[dasgroover]

Einstein couldn't accept the idea of (two) entangled particles communicating at a distance

Bohm observed it was not two individual particles but one nucleus - which has two protons separated from each other and flying off in 'opposite' directions

Nassim's math paper has the same effect of lifting us off our held concepts

[indie3]

The boundary of a fractal can be infinite, but the boundary is not a real thing, it's just .... a boundary. The area (or volume) of a fractal, the object itself, as in the Koch example, gets nowhere near infinite.

[indie3]

Regarding the Koch fractal, its area is the sum of infinitely many ever-smaller equilateral triangles. This Geometric Series can be shown to equal (2.s^2.sqrt(3))/5, where s is the length of the original triangle's side. The original triangle has area (s^2.sqrt(3))/4). So the sum total area of the fractal (with an infinite number of ever-smaller triangles) is equal to 8/5 the area of the original triangle. That's just 1 and 3/5ths times. NOT INFINITY. Not even x2.

[321lawc]

I think he was talking about length, which is indeed infinite

[ConsciousCosmic]

He's not talking about the total area of the hypothetical fractal drawn on paper. He already knows that value won't exceed its enclosure.

What Haramein seems to be describing is the continuous evolution itself, of the koch fractal to infinity within the "finite" boundary. As he said, he could allow his software to continue evolving the koch fractal and it would never leave the circumferential boundary.

[ConsciousCosmic]

This is significant as it implies an infinite scalar re-patterning throughout nature that also maintains an appearance of finite boundary form.

[trademark1989est]

@indie3 infinatly small . 1.9999999999999999999999999999 in goes on for infinity

[d1mw1t666]

@indie3 It's an example.

[indie3]

More importantly, "mathematical infinity" and "physically infinitely small" do not map onto each other. In reality at one goes downwards in scale, towards the Planck Lenth, the very idea of size and distance become broken down, when quantum indeterminacy dominates.

[xmenprince]

@indie3 have you check it out in your experiments? No? Then you don't kwon, you believe it, someone teach you that. My point, you can't belive in this guy as much that you can't believe in the textbook. Of course the textbook can teach you how to probe it, and how to applied it then you know but again you can't probe everything by yourself.

[indie3]

Quinctius; you are absolutely correct.

Nassim takes standard fractal theory and (as usual) gets it all wrong. One can erect an infinite series of smaller shapes on an outer shape (such as the Koch Curve fractal), BUT each successive iteration gets smaller, and as you pointed out, the sum of this infinite series does NOT equal infinity, in fact it doesn't even get past 2!

Time and again, Nassim relies on the ignorance of his audience, in this case ignorance of fractal geometry and math.

[ConsciousCosmic]

Using calculus and the definition of a limit, you're right, the area of the fractal will not come very close to the area of the enclosing circle. Nassim even pointed this out: "Although I can place an infinite number of triangles I will never exceed the first boundary I made for myself."

He's not talking about the sum of an infinite series. He's referring to the property of perpetual evolution within the enclosed boundary space.

"because you can divide to infinity within the circumference.."

[indie3]

An intriguing idea, bebop, and very relevant, since nassim does NOT believe in the Strong and Weak Nuclear forces essential for radioactive decay! So he should be quite confident that the hydrogen cyanide will never be released inside the box. If he's wrong however, we would obtain a quantum superposition of dead/live nassims. When we open the box, collapse of the wavefunction would produce a live or dead classical nassim. Which one would make more sense? Try to think outside the box. :)

[14bebop14]

Ladies and gentlemen, I believe we found our schrodinger's cat. Live experimentation anyone?

[Karma01010]

standard crackpottery. will sell like hotcakes to the paramoron / pyramidiot crowd.

[SubliminalAttraction]

What is also important here is the bravery of a thinker determined to go somewhere without limiting himself.

It is important to dream...

[determinedone]

Explain your reasoning on that, techinically every number in our system of math is an infinite number because there are an infinite number of zeros after the decimal place to define that number, if you don't read beyond the decimal to the infinite degree you will never know what number you are really looking at. So start looking outside of the box that has been given to you.

[Quinctius]

the whole rabble about infinite is not about how many number are behind the comma, but before. An infinite number has an infinite amount of digits BEFORE the comma. EXAMPLE: 2.000000000... is not an infinite number because you can exceed it with another number, namely 3. Therefore you have missed entirely the meaning of (mathematical) infinity. Do your research.

[Quinctius]

the statement about the mass is a lie.

An infinite sum of finite things can produce a finite sum. example: 1 + 1/2 + 1/4 + 1/8 + 1/16 +... will NEVER exceed the amount of 2.

[wisemanandfool]

He doesn't believe in Mathematics!

[carolnikkiperry]

@Quinctius that is what it is implied by its geometric model

[carolnikkiperry]

@Quinctius but he clearly seems unable to match his example with what he explains. but relative to the supposed fractal nature of universe you will find infinite amout of particules inside an atom...but clearly not an infinite mass.

[giddygiddy85]

@Quinctius yeah it wil never ever ever ever no matter far u go... wait u cud even say 1+1/2+1/4....will never reach 2 INFINITY

[ThePowerofReason]

@Quinctius but it will always get infinitely close to 2... there will be an infinitely small number between the answer and 2.

[hatzinwondering]

@Quinctius thing is dude is hes talking about cells in your body. when they divide they dont divide smaller. they divide in equal size. thats how you grow. or you would never have grown as a child. so really they do have infinite potential for mass.

[trademark1989est]

@Quinctius It Is Infinate. Infanitly Small. eg 1.9999999999999999999999999999­99999999999999999999999999 it never makes a finate sum as it goes on forever. do you agree?

[woodwhips]

@Quinctius

You just proved the point of never creating an finite sum..

What exactly is the finite sum of the calculation you gave?

[pattah]

@Quinctius that isnt finite. it just has a limit, but it will never be quantified. limit =starting point. and if u think of it like this.. there is only one circle.. and its starting point is 1. and 1 in your sequence as well... you can get to another circle (what you want to call 2 in your sequence) because infinity in the circle has no place for another circle to get to, it will never exceed or get beyond the circle. there is no 2 to get to, because the nature of inifinity is not dualist

[d1mw1t666]

@Quinctius It's an example.

[SrRulao]

This is not science and should not be mistaken as such. Nothing about this follows the scientific method.

[synergysymphony]

@SrRulao you obviously haven't looked very far into Nassims' research and publications

[EleanorHandcart]

@synergysymphony why is that 'obvious'? Have you looked into them?

[crunkerdrunk]

@SrRulao I'm not trying to bring you back to a year old comment, although my understanding of science is asking questions then trying to figure it out to solid proof. The scientific method is just a standardized way to produce science in our paradigm, but is not science itself. I'd like to be corrected, if I'm wrong.

[SrRulao]

@crunkerdrunk Hi.

If you produce knowledge with method X, you produce X knowledge, if you produce knowledge with method Y, you produce Y knowledge.

If you use a reformed method to acquire knowledge you will not acquire scientific knowledge, because the method is what defines it.

A debate can be had over the failures and benefits of any one method, but, if you do not follow the scientific method you will not produce science. It might very well be true, but, it won't be scientific.

[joethepro3]

Ahh!! im so happy now! i realized why i see the symbol of infinaty during meditations!!! this is awesome!!!!!!!!!! : )

[littledropofcum]

this guy is a fucking genius.

[mikisheadmaster]

Sometimes I believe many scientists really know nothing.

[dumbnetworks]

nothing that this guy says is new, absolutely nothing

[Ghis1964b]

Have YOU even began trying really really seriously hard to find a theory that could explain to all the other sheople around as to WHY DID you choose that user name?

Tell the truth! You are a mole.

You are payed to do what you do. And I don't care, ant which way, you have lost the game a long time ago. The worst is, you don't know a shit about that game, you are so low lost man...

Please, accept the peace. Life will never end anyway. Might as well understand this fact once and for all.

Peace

[dumbnetworks]

you speak like those scientologists, you are sure you are not one? TELL THE TRUTH MYFRIEND! tell the truth!, you are a fat scumbag, trying to be cool behind a computer, this is coming to be a NASSIM cult more than science, I admit some of his ideeas are interesting but he is waaaaaaaaaay off in others, so much in fact that he looks realy stupid making some of his statements

[charronfamilyconnect]

This has got to be the Howie Mandel of Physicists if you get my drift!! haHa!!!!

[cykcykcykcykbum]

Balance between expansion and contraction of the universe also applies to the way our knowledge is develop.

Compare the common knowledge of our Solar System and an atom with its particles to a new approaching "rumors" about the Wormholes theory and... Ganesh particle.

See the simultaneity?

[271975hctruth]

fractal universe does that sound better

[hightmz30]

infinity is a mathamatical construct............in reality it does not exist

[Ghis1964b]

You are right,but you're wrong in the same mouth full.

Infinity has no pass nor future.All time is there at once.e.g.;if you were to die today,you would be able to see and be with all of the other person that are with you"here"today. Think of it first, it is all more simpler than what you might think of this at first.

Also,since you come from the all knowing (the God),you are not here to learn,you are here to try to remember how to get all the knowing you left up-there before coming here...

[Ghis1964b]

you can't figure this out right now maybe, I understand. It took me longer than any dumb people. Now that I see it, I can't understand why have I seen this before.

Now, you can see how hard this can be to make that understandable to people when you finaly wake them at least a bit.

That is why you have to find all the info you can so that you can understand this all on your own. That is the only way.

You will realize it along the way that it is sad to see everyone else are still blind.

Peace

[hightmz30]

think about it bud can there be an infinite number of past events.

[Ghis1964b]

Does numbers in math goes both ways, or only ahead (0,1,2,3... or ...-3,-2,-1,0,1,2,3...). And this is only 1 dimension. Put that to any dimension you want, the result will show you that infinity goes both ways. Everyone believes that infinity has no end, I just can't understand why they cannot see that it has no beginning either. It has always been there.... this is infinity.

Do a search on quantum, it describes that present action can affect past event. Hard to believe yeah.

Peace

[hightmz30]

than whats infinity minus infinity? infinity

whats half of infinity? infinity

whats quarter of infinity?infinity

this is rediculius, it is undefinable in real life.

in real life their are some universal truths one of which is part of something is less than whole of that thing.

[Ghis1964b]

U said it yourself,think about it now.The problem is that you see it with a fixed view point.Nothing will ever prove to anyone that the way we see thing,a view point, is fixed.The universe is expanding"based"on our view point.Our"real life"point of view might not be at all a well fixed thing.When everything around in this universe is forever changing, what is the proof that our"view point"is not in fact"diminishing"?

There are lots of dimensions,or"view"is only one of them.(A box).

Peace

[Ghis1964b]

I would suggest to you to find all you can about "energy from the vacuum" and Tom Bearden". There are works done proving we can tap energy from anywhere in the surrounding air and space we are or no matter where we are. In order for these works to be fact, as they are, Nassim's theories have to be true.

The earth is not flat you know. The universe is more than what religions and rulers wants us to believe. Rulers are always trying to find a way to remain rulers.

They are "parasites".

Peace

[Ghis1964b]

Do a search on youtube for "Dr Quantum", there is a video showing that particules and waves react depending on the observer view point.

It shows in fact that if a tree falls in a forest, and nobody is there to hear it, there is no sound.

In order for anything to happen, it need an observer. Check-out the two clips on my page about "The Secret Beyond Matter". This is the way I see the universe since I was 7 or 8 years old.

Peace

[hightmz30]

i dont have a problem with these theories, i have a problem with science telling me that god doesnt exist because none of these theories demonstrate that.

i love this quote "WE ARE THE UNIVERSE LOOKING BACK AT IT SELF SAYING WOW HOW DID THIS HAPPEN"

[Ghis1964b]

thx bro, because this is the way I have been imagining the universe since I was a kid (7-8 years old)

But Nassim went open with it. He dared to ask question instead of accepting what we are all though to be factual truth. Naturally, he destroys the fairytale view of every religious books, this had to be sooner or later anyway. Religious books are archives, but they are breath to people in a fairytale doctrine, hiding the real knowledge they contain.

Knowledge is power, rulers don't share it.

[hightmz30]

religion is a small word for what i accept as truth, we dont have a book but we have been commanded to recite.

Knowledge is important because it allows us to fullfill the purpose of our existance.

[HigherPlanes]

I know but he pointed out that you're looking at it wrong because, your thinking is erroneous and that's why it seems flimsy to you. Gotta think outside the box man.

[OBeymydreamz]

i never heard that universe is contracting?? ive learned that it is expanding ,..but not contracting as well? is it just metaphore or is he 4 real?

[eneaenea9]

To every action, there's an equal but opposite reaction.

If something is expanding, for example a ballon, then obviously something else is contracting, your lungs...

[nasherboy112]

its doing both at the same time kinda if you get that

[RobertaPeck]

Thankyou so much for posting !!!!!!,These first several videos on his Unified Field Theory are so enlightening and inspiring.

[pfvloveme]

Good for you, frogleshmee !! X

[markarianman]

subtitles in spanish please !!!

[ScientiaVir]

I think like you Nassim.

[400oakley20]

If you like this presentation you will love his DVD "Crossing the Event Horizon"

I love this guy.

Namaste

[JezusFlowers]

Absolutely fascinating. Thank you very much for posting this whole series.

[mrtoomy]

Yep this is probably one of the most important lecture to humanity, that's not even an exaggeration in my view, so important for everyone to see this. It would change alot of people for the better.

[scomberscombrus]

yeah yeah someone uploads something irrelevant like pimple cream and gets 1000's of views...something informativecomes up and very few watch it

[Rollinestilo]

I completely agree with what sonny said

[SonnyWyatt]

I am amazed at the fact that amazing lectures such as this are totally free and all over YouTube and still the masses are moronic.....thank you for posting.

Five Stars every time.

[v0jk3c]

Because the motto of the masses is ''dont fix it if aint broken'' they like to go to work, pay taxes and bills to infinity and other stuff, but people whit questions are we who would like to know what are we doing here learn stuff and our history...

[frogleshmee]

i get slaughtered by my mates for not watching soaps or shity reality tv celebrity crap. they think im wierd for watching things like this and not big brother. whats the world coming to, im not the brightest but i want and love to learn stuff like this.

[trashmail8]

I can only say: hold the line! :-D

And much respect for being someone who does not let the group/others decide what is interesting and what is not.

Wish there were more like you around! :-)

[jackigurl31]

Awesomeness.