ATHEISM'S TENET IS [TO SEE GOD DIRECTLY IS TO BELIEVE ]. HOW ON EARTH CAN ATHEISTS WITHOUT USING MRI BRAIN SCANS AS BIBLE & WITHOUT RESORTING TO A GOD DESIGNED UNIFORMITY IN NATURE THAT EVERY ONE HAS A BRAIN, EVER BE ABLE TO PROVE THEY HAVE A BRAIN. THIS [TSGDITB] RULE OF THUMB, IS D MOST MORONIC KIND OF RULE I HAVE KNOWN. IF THERE IS NO DESIGNER GOD, D SWEAT DEFLECTING EYEBROWS SHOULD BE SOMETIMES UNDER SOMEONE' S EYES. IF NO ONE CAN ANSWER ME, SO AS THEY SAY IN FENCING"TOUCHE" U R LOGIC DEAD!
I'm a Christian and I find this very amusing. More power to you. BTW, you have a youtube account to post on (like a a prophet?) and you write comments on it (like scripture?) but, how do I know you're real and somebody didn't make you up? :)
It is astounding you choose to pounce on spelling errors versus the message. This is a sign you have no argument and bask in the ability to point out errors in spelling. The coherent argument still stands you just choose not to address it due to spelling…lol It is the easy way out don’t address the argument attack the spelling as it means so much more.
@Shop4poop Atheists do that ALL the time, being a wise ass & suddenly becoming a Harvard english professor every time they see a simple typo is one of the many ways they fuel their pathetic egos.
as an Orthodox christian, and having proof that our theology is absolutely sound, (Thats as far as christianity goes, not breaching the subject of existence vs. non-existence) because well,lets face it, its never changed and we are the original church, i can say number 54 makes ME mad. because it discredits Christianity as a whole, i know. its annoying. but honestly, we as christians are not supposed to argue theism vs atheism, only to spread the loving message. overall,these are actually funny.
This is all well and good, but in all seriousness. Religion isn't bad, people who can't stand being disagreed with are. These religious nuts claim that you can't understand God, if that is the case, then how does anyone know what he (or she, cuz we can't be sure) wants from us? Maybe we should just be good to each other instead of trying to cause so much pain, treating each other with kindness might be all we need to do to be happy, and if that doesn't get you into heaven, you can blame it on me
How to piss off Christians. 1) Tell them they are 99% atheist since they don't believe in any other religions. 2) Bring up evolution. 3) state any fact, it goes against their religion trust me. 4) Say that God doesn't believe in a higher entity than he so therefore God is an Atheist. I have more.
@Curassus 1)Atheism is not believe there is a god or gods, or not Believing in God Himself 2)Evolution is a lie, not one scientific TRUE FACT proves it, and it'd full of contraindications by the millions 3)Find me one TRUE FACT that goes against my FAITH (not religion) and\or the Bible 4)God does believe in Himself, therefore He's not an Atheist. Also God believes in Christ, so that makes Him a Christian.
@ruzzdugg Lol i listed a whole bunch of logical fallacies to piss you off, and it worked, although there are mountains of evidence for evolution you just close your eyes and spout bible verses till it goes away Yahweh fanboi
@Curassus LOL, LOL, LOL, you're funny. Question first of all did you piss me off? hmm... think about it, umm, think some more, well not one droplet. All you did was say some lies and i pointed out what's really true. If you tell a petrolhead, who's into cars that a Bugatti has only a W12 engine, well guess what? He'll tell you that it's got a W16 because it does. As for that capitals, it's just to emphasis some points and you can't use italics or bold here. But thanks for the laugh either way.
@Th3Apparition It has been proven, you just blind yourself. Gravity is a theory too, be skeptical about that as well and misconstrue the real meaning of theory so you can float away.
@Curassus well if evolution has been proven, where did the matter that caused the big bang come from? And if a mutation that adds to DNA is required to go from one kind to another, how come we have never found any that do that?
@Th3Apparition The Big Bang has nothing to do with Evolution, they're two different fields of science. as for the second question, rephrase unless you are using the "give examples of new information to the genome via mutation or evolutionary process" i can give you a link to the answer.
want proof? transitional fossils, genetic parallels, how every plant and animal is where it is expected to be if evolution was correct. all you did was spew creationist straw men.
@Curassus: Whether the Big Bang has to do with evolution or not depends whether you define "evolution" as a universal or a terrestric matter. Yet, astronomers are actually talking of the "evolution of the universe". - They obviously do not refer to the evolutionary process of life on earth, but they compare the universe's development with an evolutionary process.
@GGGNVideos Yeah I know but the evolution i describe is the biological sense, although cosmic or stellar evolution is up for debate, I admit i haven't looked into either field because I am majoring in Biology. astrophysics, astrology, and cosmology are not my strong suit.
funny the other guy has nothing to say after this though.
@Curassus: No offense, I just snapped in. - In case you have a minute: Try to get the rough picture, it's certainly time well-spent and you'll immediately see why they call it "evolution" as well. Try to get some documentation - I'd love to give you stg to refer to, but I'm German, so mostof the stuff I could mention here were in German anyway...
but me easiset way to piss you christian guy ? open your bible pull my dick off and pee on it or make jesus picture as my toilet paper UMADBRO ? too easy
Actually, Atheism IS a belief(yeah yeah yeah, I know, it's a negative belief blah blah blah). It is the belief that I know better and my logic and reason are to be trusted more than some book of fairy tales that was written by war mongering bigots who were sexist, racist, and Schizophrenic! This is the funniest shit I have heard all fucking day.
cosmological argument: Every finite and contingent being has a cause. A causal loop cannot exist. A causal chain cannot be of infinite length. Therefore, a First Cause (or something that is not an effect) must exist.
@chyeabench A causal chain can't be of infinite length. Then a first cause/creator hasn't always existed. Please explain WHAT created the first cause.
I am trying to see why atheists don't believe in god but there is NO REASON WHATSOEVER that you have to disbelieve in god, and besides the quran, the bible, and the torah all guarantee a good afterlife, what if god doesnt exist and heaven or hell dont exist we will experience nothingness right? but what if god exists and you people will regret what you have done in this world and go to hell, only an idiot would take a big risk like that, if i were you I would accept islam to be on the safe side.
maybe because some people stopped believed in fairytales? it's really simple.. it's 21th century, we have no reason whatsoever to belive in condtraciting itself bible.
@walid334 What if it's not islam? What if it's christianity? or Judaism? Or Hinduism? Or Scientology? Then you would go to hell anyways. Eternity in hell. That's a great way for God to show he loves all his people right?
@walid334 what if the Egyptian gods are true.. are you planning to mummify yourself after you die or face eternity in the underworld? what if the matrix is true.. are you planning to escape before the program is reset?.. no? then why do you focus on god when the possibility of his existence is just the same as any other unproven stories out there which promises eternal suffering if you dont accept them?
The only real way to piss off an Atheist is to call them an extremist or a fundamentalist.
Which they are, along with theists.
Atheists think they're something special, they're not, they're thicker than theists in my opinion. They've been radicalised and they follow the strictest doctrine ever known, and many bow down to their deity, Richard Dawkins.
@RichyBMelodies There isn't a doctrine Atheism & Atheism has no tenets. It's nothing more than the rejection of theism. Rejection of theism has existed long before Richard Dawkins came into existence. Many People who reject theism never heard of Richard Dawkins. Many theists have been indoctrinated into believing religious dogma without question.
@RichyBMelodies I disagree with Your ASSessment. I'm not a fundamentalist / extremist. Just what type of fundamentalist/ extremist do You think I am ? Whatever gave You the impression that I'm a fundamentalist/ extremist ? You sound like an Individual who rushes to judgement before gathering information or asking questions.
@tranquility4all You seem so defensive in the favour or Atheism and so I assumed you were one. If this is not the case then fine but, all Atheists are extremists and thats inarguable.
@RichyBMelodies You ASSert it's fine if someone defends atheism as long as they're not an atheist. Your ASSumption that all atheists are extremists is nothing more than an unsupported opinion & reflects Your bigotry against all people who question or reject the existence of a god. Your rush to judgement is OBVIOUS ! You're an irrational extremist because You're casting a blanket indictment by labeling all People extremists who either question or reject theist claims.
@tranquility4all Ok for some reason you removed your latest comment. But in response to your statement: Surely somebody who fundamentally believes something they don't know for sure has been radicalised an amount?
The FUNDAMENTAL belief of an atheist is that there is no God, they're fundamentalists.
Agnosticism admits it doesnt know, and that's everyone, nobody knows. If you say you do (Which atheists do by claiming there is no God), they're extremists.
@RichyBMelodies Atheism is the rejection of theist claims. It isn't a belief. It's a rejection of what theists believe. Theists believe a god exists but don't have evidence too support their belief. Are all theists fundamentalists/ extremists ? Not all atheists claim to know a god doesn't exist. They question or reject the claim because it's not supported with evidence. If You claim all Atheists are extreme fundamentalist, Then You should claim all theists are extreme fundamentalists.
@RichyBMelodies My pt. is Atheism isn't a belief. It's a rejection of what theists believe. Atheism doesn't make claims. It has no tenets. Theism is a belief in a god. Atheism is a rejection of that belief. The only thing that's simple is Your inability to understand the meaning of Atheism. A previous comment was removed because of 2 typos which may have misrepresented my comment. Agnosticism is the belief that nothing can be known to prove or refute a claim
@RichyBMelodies Here's an example which may explain Atheism. If You make a claim that a god exists & I say don't believe Your claim even though I can't refute Your claim, Am I an extreme fundamentalist atheist ? A person is an Atheist who rejects theist claims. A person isn't an extreme fundamentalist Atheist because they can't prove all gods don't exist. Extreme fundamentalism is accepting a claim without evidence NOT questioning or rejecting the claim because it isn't supported with evidence.
@RichyBMelodies Atheists are extremists ? Invalid ASSertion. You can choose to reject evidence. However Evidence can confirm claims, Faith doesn't. Theists don't present evidence to support their claims. They accept claims based on blind faith & willful ignorance. Theists are Extremists & many are Irrational Extremists.
@RichyBMelodies Evidence is subjective ? What do You classify faith as ? Are You so naive to suggest it's more extreme to reject claims which are based on faith than to accept them ? You can choose to reject evidence. You shouldn't posit faith is more relevant than evidence.
@RichyBMelodies You see that the reverse of your logic is true right? "Agnosticism admits it doesnt know, and that's everyone, nobody knows." Plenty of Christians have told me they 100% know they'll go to heaven and I'll go to hell, ideologies are tricky.
@RichyBMelodies you're an extremist because you believe with faith, you don't need proof you have a reporters gut instinct. that and a $1.75 will get you a hot cup of coffee.
@dancthegr You're right, atheism is a faith. They have faith in what they believe, their doctrine, therefor it is a faith. If he disagrees with you tell him he's radicalised and you don't speak to extremists.
@XperiencesOfXistence Right........... so the fact that there is the periods B.C. and A.D. suggest that everyone is a dumbass and all history teachers are impotent freaks with nothing better to do, not to mention the centuries ofLEADERS and SIGNIFICANT people who still stand by this. Youre going to tell ME that i am WRONG? Well sorry to spoil your party ad burst your BUBBLE but it is the FACT! GOD IS REAL.
@andrewasle many use B.C.E. now, pal. not just b.c. 'BEFORE CHRISTIAN ERA'. and there are no gods existing outside the human mind. i just bursted your ego's bubble. trust me, this atheist will crush your ego's hymen faster than a jew picking up a penny off the sidewalk.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
And you're pulling shit out of your ass trying to be funny for a big group of people that you don't even know. Congrats on progressing in your life bro.
#3: The universe physically exists, as all that we know, lies within it. God is not a physical person or thing, and only physically exists through people and actions. If God only exists in the hearts and minds of people around the world, who's to say that's nonexistent?...oh...an ignorant, hard-headed Athiest such as yourself. Open your eyes.
@kernalbanders When you say "hearts" you mean mind I assume since the heart has the purpose of pumping blood. From what you're saying that God only exists in the minds of some people,that is completely correct. The brain is very complex and very complicated, it can make things that are untrue and incorrect seem 100% true and valid. There are those who believe many nonsensical things, and those that are what we consider retarded because of chemical changes and differences in the brain from norm.
@kernalbanders If batman lives in my heart it does not make him real, your belief in god is not proof of any kind. I would say we have as much proof he's non existent as you have that he is. Your "proof" that he exists in the hearts of people is funny and it makes me laugh.
@daNDayati You don't believe cause you choose not to believe. You refuse to believe cause you don't wanna admit that their's consequences for your actions.
@daNDayati I'm talking about the one true God. The God who was and is and is to come. He who calls himself I Am. Yahweh. Jehovah. Lord of Heaven and Earth. The one true God. You can call me a nut all you want but I'm just speaking the truth. I'm not passing judgement on you as to where your soul will God. Only God can decide that. I'm just trying to deliever a message of hope to you so that you will get saved. I believe because I know God exists.
@daNDayati When you get to Judgement and God pronounces judgement on you, just try to say "But your supposed to be imaginary". To know God all you have to do is search for him, accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and follow God's commands. What's sad and pathetic is someone who blatantly denies the existance of God when they know deep down inside that God does exist.
oh and i would also like to commend you on your ability to approach this video through the perspective of a pious person... i doubt a christian would ever consider considering our point of view. thank you for not being ignorant.
I don't believe in god, and I have had a lot of people actually use some of these on me, and their shear ignorance to use some of the stupid arguments really pissed me off, cause I don't find it funny in some instances to be reminded that the people that use some of the stupid arguments live in the same country as me. I am fine with smart Christians, but where I live, they are few and far between.
Hahaha! Love this video! The only people that are matched in fervor with hard core christians is hard core atheists. I dont understand atheists, heck i dont understand some christians.
#32 makes perfect sense if you think like a lot of people, who don't understand assumptions don't work mathematically, because they never properly learned Boolean algebra.
@daNDayati That's right. Go ahead and show how just 2 responses have made you mad. I won't lose any sleep cause I know that God is real. Maybe you should try seaching for God. It might do you some good.
You heard people say- "it will never be found", "it ain't true", "it just can't be".
I'm here to tell you these People are wrong- I found it. Using Google Earth -
I found God's Watermarks of the REAL Garden of Eden. Look at my Channel and see the Video I made of it. I didn't point all of it out either- there are many things still hid for you to find. I even have 3 picture's of God Himself. Come see what He looks like - EPIC !
@daNDayati Well I can sleep at night. Cause I know if I live I have God to see me through the day. If I die, then I get to go to heaven to be with God.
I liked number 43 the best and how God does not believe in atheist....Praise the Lord! Although you forgot when "us" Christians give you that look and say....Bless your heart:)
In the name of Satan, ruler of Earth, the King of the world, the Chief of the Serfs, I command the forces of darkness to bestow their infernal power upon us. Save us, Lord Satan, from the treacherous and the violent. Oh Satan, Spirit of the Earth, God of Liberty, open wide the gates of Hell and come forth from the abyss by these names: Satan! Ba'al Zəbûb! Leviathan! Asmodeus! Abaddon!
You know here's my take on it. If God and Christ are great, good caring beings, they would be understanding of people. I honestly cannot in my heart honestly say that I believe God exists, or that Christ was his son. On judgement day, when Christ comes back to earth he will see lots of good people, who do the right thing for others with a smile on their faces, but oh, they pursue the truth instead of allowing themselves to be bullied into what others tell them to think, so, hell for them!
there are some atheists, not all, who think that believing in a higher power is only for ignorant people. these same people claim that science is their "religion." but yet the foundation for "modern day" science was laid down by people like isaac newton and robert boyle, both of whom believed in a higher power. i highly doubt these same atheists would call newton and boyle ignorant or stupid. i am not arguing for or against a higher power. im just merely making a statement that was on my mind.
Oh, sorry, I can't really answer that anymore. I'm an agnostic pantheist. Whats the point in believing in a creator that does nothing? There's no difference between no god, and a sedentary god. LOL So yea, now I'm basically just a polite atheist in disguise.
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
@Mogley52 ive been trying to explain that idea to atheists for so long.....they believe in impossible adaptation. they dont understand adaptation constitutes your actions and not your genetics.
@DLeeMusik Keep on "explaining" that buddy, cause no one is gonna listen. Evolution is a scientifically verifiable fact whether you like it or not. However, you don't need to be an atheist to accept it. In fact, the Catholic church embraces the theory.
@ApatheticOmniscience adaptation is a fact. growing new appendages and changing your entire skeletal structure, respiratory system, circulatory by means of genetic mutations is the opposite of a fact. the catholic church embraces evolution? u mean the same catholic church that says Jesus is the way and then also says the pope is Jesus himself and should be worshiped as God? the same church that places divine characteristics on Mary, promotes idol worship and continues Jesus' sacrifice over and
@DLeeMusik I care not for the religious practices of the Catholic church. Your time spent belittling them is meaningless to me. However, adaptation is evolution. Microevolution is only macroevolution on a larger timescale. To argue otherwise would be self-contradictory. Self-contradictory claims belong to the same group you so contemptuously place Catholicism in. So please, don't insult yourself.
@ApatheticOmniscience haha u dont care for them but u seem to use them as examples to prove evolution haha how stupid are you. adaptation isnt evolution adaptation is ACTIONS not PHYSICAL CHANGES. microevolution hmmm ok so has any of these bacterial organisms turned into anything other than bacteria? has any micro organism started to turn into anything with a brain cell? to argue otherwise would be self contradictory? contradictory to what? ur the guy in class with no friends whos considered a
@DLeeMusik *sigh* You're such a typical creationist. Lacking the basic understanding for the things you so desperately try to disprove.
And now you've resorted to name calling? A "guy in class with no friend"? Are you serious? Is that really your best argument? Can you at least try to act like a human being? Why do all you creationists act the same way? It's getting old dude. Trolling doesn't work on me. I'm sorry, but I have better things rather to waste time educating kids like you
@DLeeMusik As I expected... You refuse to learn. Continue to live as you wish, but blatant idiocy does not fair well in society my friend.
Ehh, at least I can say that I tried, it makes me feel somewhat accomplished. I hope one day you'll seek a proper education and finally be a beneficial member to society. Until then, you're just a troll. A troll that deserves not a second more of my time.. So, I think I'm done here, g'day.
@ApatheticOmniscience keep on believing trillions and trillions of mutations can happen and all be beneficial even though the only mutations around today are retardation and negative effects. keep believing a bacteria cell can create the entire diversity of the earth you idiot. keep being spoon fed. im also receiving a higher education than you with a higher gpa smug little poser.
@ApatheticOmniscience "nerd" yet you have no intellect and make irrelevant claims to accusations that havent even been addressed or even implied. its sad. i really feel bad for the "nerds" that arent smart. nothing going for them.
@ApatheticOmniscience over again even though its condemned? the same church that contradicts everything it says? the same catholic church that accepts other religions such as taoism, buddhism, even gypsies and fortune tellers as equals? wow evolution must be true then. ha.
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
HUMAN-CHIMP DNA MYTH: The actual similarity is between 70-87% not 99.8% as commonly believed. The original research stating 99.8% similarity was based on ignoring contradicting evidence. Read the article, "Evaluating the Human-Chimp DNA Myth--New Research Data" at the Institute for Creation Research Site. The similarities are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes, rather than chance. Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC is similar to seeing an earthquake churn-up a few well-formed rocks and concluding from this that earthquakes, if given enough time, can construct a building. Macro-evolutionists take the little things here and there produced by chance and extrapolate it into something extraordinary and then call it science. Notice, all evolutionists begin with a complete species. They don't begin their theory with partially-evolved species, with partially-evolved tissues and organs.
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. For every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
This has been flagged as spam show
ATHEISM'S TENET IS [TO SEE GOD DIRECTLY IS TO BELIEVE ]. HOW ON EARTH CAN ATHEISTS WITHOUT USING MRI BRAIN SCANS AS BIBLE & WITHOUT RESORTING TO A GOD DESIGNED UNIFORMITY IN NATURE THAT EVERY ONE HAS A BRAIN, EVER BE ABLE TO PROVE THEY HAVE A BRAIN. THIS [TSGDITB] RULE OF THUMB, IS D MOST MORONIC KIND OF RULE I HAVE KNOWN. IF THERE IS NO DESIGNER GOD, D SWEAT DEFLECTING EYEBROWS SHOULD BE SOMETIMES UNDER SOMEONE' S EYES. IF NO ONE CAN ANSWER ME, SO AS THEY SAY IN FENCING"TOUCHE" U R LOGIC DEAD!
CONDUIT99PERCENT 1 day ago
I'm a Christian and I find this very amusing. More power to you. BTW, you have a youtube account to post on (like a a prophet?) and you write comments on it (like scripture?) but, how do I know you're real and somebody didn't make you up? :)
Redskin1040 4 days ago
i do not know why atheist think they have a right to live
staywithaces1984 5 days ago
It is astounding you choose to pounce on spelling errors versus the message. This is a sign you have no argument and bask in the ability to point out errors in spelling. The coherent argument still stands you just choose not to address it due to spelling…lol It is the easy way out don’t address the argument attack the spelling as it means so much more.
Shop4poop 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Shop4poop Atheists do that ALL the time, being a wise ass & suddenly becoming a Harvard english professor every time they see a simple typo is one of the many ways they fuel their pathetic egos.
MrPeacekeeper100 2 weeks ago
your dumb and bias dude
dieselexplsion 3 weeks ago
@dieselexplsion The word you're looking for is "biased" not bias. Bias is a noun, a thing. Biased is an adjective, a word that describes.
Stay in school, buddy.
GloomCookie613 3 weeks ago
@GloomCookie613
dieselexplsion 2 weeks ago
@GloomCookie613 thanks i guess
dieselexplsion 2 weeks ago
@dieselexplsion Also, it's "you're" not your. Your is possessive, it denotes ownership. You're is a contraction, it stands for you are.
The sentence you were *trying* to write would look like this if it were done correctly:
"You're dumb and biased, dude."
GloomCookie613 3 weeks ago
(in the background the crowed whispers: burnnnnned) lol I think I invented #55
Shop4poop 1 month ago
as an Orthodox christian, and having proof that our theology is absolutely sound, (Thats as far as christianity goes, not breaching the subject of existence vs. non-existence) because well,lets face it, its never changed and we are the original church, i can say number 54 makes ME mad. because it discredits Christianity as a whole, i know. its annoying. but honestly, we as christians are not supposed to argue theism vs atheism, only to spread the loving message. overall,these are actually funny.
baseballgreekz 1 month ago
@Excelion333 Hey Chris, Are you real, because I have no proof of your existence. we have never seen you before. lol
Shop4poop 1 month ago 2
@Shop4poop I have a youtube account, therefore I am.
Excelion333 1 month ago
@Excelion333 So does God. lol
Shop4poop 1 month ago 2
This is all well and good, but in all seriousness. Religion isn't bad, people who can't stand being disagreed with are. These religious nuts claim that you can't understand God, if that is the case, then how does anyone know what he (or she, cuz we can't be sure) wants from us? Maybe we should just be good to each other instead of trying to cause so much pain, treating each other with kindness might be all we need to do to be happy, and if that doesn't get you into heaven, you can blame it on me
parker2324 1 month ago
The amazing atheist created 1,430 acounts.
Decimate92 1 month ago
@skylerrb I am a non believer yes, these won't piss us off they will just make us laugh, kind of a joke.
Excelion333 1 month ago
In other words be a Christian creationist.
HobbsO 2 months ago in playlist More videos from Excelion333
How to piss off Christians. 1) Tell them they are 99% atheist since they don't believe in any other religions. 2) Bring up evolution. 3) state any fact, it goes against their religion trust me. 4) Say that God doesn't believe in a higher entity than he so therefore God is an Atheist. I have more.
Curassus 2 months ago 5
@Curassus I need about 10 more, can I use your name in the video or would you prefer to be anonymous.
Excelion333 2 months ago
@Excelion333 i sent you a message with more, and yes you can use my name if you wish to do so.
Curassus 2 months ago
@Curassus 1)Atheism is not believe there is a god or gods, or not Believing in God Himself 2)Evolution is a lie, not one scientific TRUE FACT proves it, and it'd full of contraindications by the millions 3)Find me one TRUE FACT that goes against my FAITH (not religion) and\or the Bible 4)God does believe in Himself, therefore He's not an Atheist. Also God believes in Christ, so that makes Him a Christian.
ruzzdugg 2 months ago
@ruzzdugg Lol i listed a whole bunch of logical fallacies to piss you off, and it worked, although there are mountains of evidence for evolution you just close your eyes and spout bible verses till it goes away Yahweh fanboi
Curassus 2 months ago
@Curassus LOL, LOL, LOL, you're funny. Question first of all did you piss me off? hmm... think about it, umm, think some more, well not one droplet. All you did was say some lies and i pointed out what's really true. If you tell a petrolhead, who's into cars that a Bugatti has only a W12 engine, well guess what? He'll tell you that it's got a W16 because it does. As for that capitals, it's just to emphasis some points and you can't use italics or bold here. But thanks for the laugh either way.
ruzzdugg 2 months ago
@Curassus Yep that'll piss me off except for #3. If it was a fact, I would acknowledge it as true. Otherwise I'd show you where it is not a fact
Th3Apparition 1 month ago
@Th3Apparition How about Evolution
Curassus 1 month ago
@Curassus its a theory. its impossible to prove as a fact
Th3Apparition 1 month ago
Comment removed
Curassus 1 month ago
@Th3Apparition It has been proven, you just blind yourself. Gravity is a theory too, be skeptical about that as well and misconstrue the real meaning of theory so you can float away.
Curassus 1 month ago
@Curassus well if evolution has been proven, where did the matter that caused the big bang come from? And if a mutation that adds to DNA is required to go from one kind to another, how come we have never found any that do that?
Th3Apparition 1 month ago
@Th3Apparition The Big Bang has nothing to do with Evolution, they're two different fields of science. as for the second question, rephrase unless you are using the "give examples of new information to the genome via mutation or evolutionary process" i can give you a link to the answer.
want proof? transitional fossils, genetic parallels, how every plant and animal is where it is expected to be if evolution was correct. all you did was spew creationist straw men.
Curassus 1 month ago
@Curassus: Whether the Big Bang has to do with evolution or not depends whether you define "evolution" as a universal or a terrestric matter. Yet, astronomers are actually talking of the "evolution of the universe". - They obviously do not refer to the evolutionary process of life on earth, but they compare the universe's development with an evolutionary process.
GGGNVideos 1 month ago
@GGGNVideos Yeah I know but the evolution i describe is the biological sense, although cosmic or stellar evolution is up for debate, I admit i haven't looked into either field because I am majoring in Biology. astrophysics, astrology, and cosmology are not my strong suit.
funny the other guy has nothing to say after this though.
Curassus 1 month ago
@Curassus: No offense, I just snapped in. - In case you have a minute: Try to get the rough picture, it's certainly time well-spent and you'll immediately see why they call it "evolution" as well. Try to get some documentation - I'd love to give you stg to refer to, but I'm German, so mostof the stuff I could mention here were in German anyway...
GGGNVideos 1 month ago
@GGGNVideos I definitely will look into it, I am sure if i google search it I can find an unbiased website explaining it all, thanks :)
Curassus 1 month ago
@Th3Apparition: We have found plenty of examples in which mutation changed the length of chromosomes. Where do you get your information from?
GGGNVideos 1 month ago
but me easiset way to piss you christian guy ? open your bible pull my dick off and pee on it or make jesus picture as my toilet paper UMADBRO ? too easy
PrimarchZabius 2 months ago
Actually, Atheism IS a belief(yeah yeah yeah, I know, it's a negative belief blah blah blah). It is the belief that I know better and my logic and reason are to be trusted more than some book of fairy tales that was written by war mongering bigots who were sexist, racist, and Schizophrenic! This is the funniest shit I have heard all fucking day.
FriendofDaishonin 2 months ago
51 made me laugh
andrexw13 2 months ago
cosmological argument: Every finite and contingent being has a cause. A causal loop cannot exist. A causal chain cannot be of infinite length. Therefore, a First Cause (or something that is not an effect) must exist.
chyeabench 3 months ago
@chyeabench A causal chain can't be of infinite length. Then a first cause/creator hasn't always existed. Please explain WHAT created the first cause.
tranquility4all 3 months ago
@DracoBlack2 Disciple by Slayer :3
randomizer666 3 months ago
I am trying to see why atheists don't believe in god but there is NO REASON WHATSOEVER that you have to disbelieve in god, and besides the quran, the bible, and the torah all guarantee a good afterlife, what if god doesnt exist and heaven or hell dont exist we will experience nothingness right? but what if god exists and you people will regret what you have done in this world and go to hell, only an idiot would take a big risk like that, if i were you I would accept islam to be on the safe side.
walid334 3 months ago
@walid334 What you are talking about is (Pascals wager) look it up, it is a fallacy.
Excelion333 3 months ago
@walid334 Read about Pascal's wager.
What will happen to Muslims if christianity is real ?
Instead of worrying about the possibility of an after life, Wake Up & start living in the Real World !
tranquility4all 3 months ago
@walid334
maybe because some people stopped believed in fairytales? it's really simple.. it's 21th century, we have no reason whatsoever to belive in condtraciting itself bible.
Dihyyy 2 months ago
@walid334 if i were you, i would fuck off
freddiebarry93 2 months ago
@walid334 What if it's not islam? What if it's christianity? or Judaism? Or Hinduism? Or Scientology? Then you would go to hell anyways. Eternity in hell. That's a great way for God to show he loves all his people right?
Artifex9989 2 months ago
@walid334 what if the Egyptian gods are true.. are you planning to mummify yourself after you die or face eternity in the underworld? what if the matrix is true.. are you planning to escape before the program is reset?.. no? then why do you focus on god when the possibility of his existence is just the same as any other unproven stories out there which promises eternal suffering if you dont accept them?
priyochatterjee1 1 month ago
The only real way to piss off an Atheist is to call them an extremist or a fundamentalist.
Which they are, along with theists.
Atheists think they're something special, they're not, they're thicker than theists in my opinion. They've been radicalised and they follow the strictest doctrine ever known, and many bow down to their deity, Richard Dawkins.
Aren't they ironic?
=]
Agnosticism..the only sane, rational way forward.
RichyBMelodies 3 months ago
@RichyBMelodies There isn't a doctrine Atheism & Atheism has no tenets. It's nothing more than the rejection of theism. Rejection of theism has existed long before Richard Dawkins came into existence. Many People who reject theism never heard of Richard Dawkins. Many theists have been indoctrinated into believing religious dogma without question.
tranquility4all 3 months ago
@tranquility4all At least you don't disagree that you're an fundamentalist/extremist.
RichyBMelodies 3 months ago
@RichyBMelodies I disagree with Your ASSessment. I'm not a fundamentalist / extremist. Just what type of fundamentalist/ extremist do You think I am ? Whatever gave You the impression that I'm a fundamentalist/ extremist ? You sound like an Individual who rushes to judgement before gathering information or asking questions.
tranquility4all 3 months ago
@tranquility4all You seem so defensive in the favour or Atheism and so I assumed you were one. If this is not the case then fine but, all Atheists are extremists and thats inarguable.
RichyBMelodies 3 months ago
Comment removed
tranquility4all 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@RichyBMelodies You ASSert it's fine if someone defends atheism as long as they're not an atheist. Your ASSumption that all atheists are extremists is nothing more than an unsupported opinion & reflects Your bigotry against all people who question or reject the existence of a god. Your rush to judgement is OBVIOUS ! You're an irrational extremist because You're casting a blanket indictment by labeling all People extremists who either question or reject theist claims.
tranquility4all 2 months ago
@tranquility4all Ok for some reason you removed your latest comment. But in response to your statement: Surely somebody who fundamentally believes something they don't know for sure has been radicalised an amount?
The FUNDAMENTAL belief of an atheist is that there is no God, they're fundamentalists.
Agnosticism admits it doesnt know, and that's everyone, nobody knows. If you say you do (Which atheists do by claiming there is no God), they're extremists.
It's so simple
RichyBMelodies 2 months ago
@RichyBMelodies Atheism is the rejection of theist claims. It isn't a belief. It's a rejection of what theists believe. Theists believe a god exists but don't have evidence too support their belief. Are all theists fundamentalists/ extremists ? Not all atheists claim to know a god doesn't exist. They question or reject the claim because it's not supported with evidence. If You claim all Atheists are extreme fundamentalist, Then You should claim all theists are extreme fundamentalists.
tranquility4all 2 months ago
@RichyBMelodies My pt. is Atheism isn't a belief. It's a rejection of what theists believe. Atheism doesn't make claims. It has no tenets. Theism is a belief in a god. Atheism is a rejection of that belief. The only thing that's simple is Your inability to understand the meaning of Atheism. A previous comment was removed because of 2 typos which may have misrepresented my comment. Agnosticism is the belief that nothing can be known to prove or refute a claim
tranquility4all 2 months ago
@RichyBMelodies Here's an example which may explain Atheism. If You make a claim that a god exists & I say don't believe Your claim even though I can't refute Your claim, Am I an extreme fundamentalist atheist ? A person is an Atheist who rejects theist claims. A person isn't an extreme fundamentalist Atheist because they can't prove all gods don't exist. Extreme fundamentalism is accepting a claim without evidence NOT questioning or rejecting the claim because it isn't supported with evidence.
tranquility4all 2 months ago
@tranquility4all Invalid argument because evidence is subjective. What somebody considers evidence, you might not. Atheists are extremists.
RichyBMelodies 2 months ago
@RichyBMelodies Atheists are extremists ? Invalid ASSertion. You can choose to reject evidence. However Evidence can confirm claims, Faith doesn't. Theists don't present evidence to support their claims. They accept claims based on blind faith & willful ignorance. Theists are Extremists & many are Irrational Extremists.
tranquility4all 2 months ago
@RichyBMelodies Evidence is subjective ? What do You classify faith as ? Are You so naive to suggest it's more extreme to reject claims which are based on faith than to accept them ? You can choose to reject evidence. You shouldn't posit faith is more relevant than evidence.
tranquility4all 2 months ago
@RichyBMelodies You see that the reverse of your logic is true right? "Agnosticism admits it doesnt know, and that's everyone, nobody knows." Plenty of Christians have told me they 100% know they'll go to heaven and I'll go to hell, ideologies are tricky.
Gexx420 2 months ago
@RichyBMelodies you're an extremist because you believe with faith, you don't need proof you have a reporters gut instinct. that and a $1.75 will get you a hot cup of coffee.
Gexx420 2 months ago
say that atheism is a faith= that really annoys them
dancthegr 3 months ago
@dancthegr You're right, atheism is a faith. They have faith in what they believe, their doctrine, therefor it is a faith. If he disagrees with you tell him he's radicalised and you don't speak to extremists.
RichyBMelodies 3 months ago
How to piss off a THEIST:... "Your 'god' watches you when you masturbate".
AntiFeminaziMale 3 months ago
@XperiencesOfXistence Right........... so the fact that there is the periods B.C. and A.D. suggest that everyone is a dumbass and all history teachers are impotent freaks with nothing better to do, not to mention the centuries ofLEADERS and SIGNIFICANT people who still stand by this. Youre going to tell ME that i am WRONG? Well sorry to spoil your party ad burst your BUBBLE but it is the FACT! GOD IS REAL.
andrewasle 3 months ago
@andrewasle many use B.C.E. now, pal. not just b.c. 'BEFORE CHRISTIAN ERA'. and there are no gods existing outside the human mind. i just bursted your ego's bubble. trust me, this atheist will crush your ego's hymen faster than a jew picking up a penny off the sidewalk.
AntiFeminaziMale 3 months ago
@andrewasle No, it's not a fact. Please look up the definition of the word.
Ok I'll help you out. Here it is. Please read it.
noun
1.
something that actually exists; reality; truth: Your fears have no basis in fact.
thinkboutit 3 months ago
i love this cuz i know alot of atheists
eternalblits 3 months ago
xDxDxDxDxD Genius...
oODoritoO 3 months ago
you are a retard
2010zombiez 3 months ago
1:44 ALL OF MY RAGE
barrius1234 3 months ago
alright, i'll admit the god doesnt believe in athiest thing was kinda funny...
AhhNick 4 months ago
umadbro?
gotsum2say 4 months ago 9
Funny video and I love Beethoven.
KennyReddwooddforest 4 months ago
#10 - Drink the last beer in the fridge!!??!!??
are you crazy? that could cause a world war in Wisconsin
ufowisconsin 4 months ago
@ufowisconsin "a world war in wisconsin" lol
houndoomdude2 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
And you're pulling shit out of your ass trying to be funny for a big group of people that you don't even know. Congrats on progressing in your life bro.
#3: The universe physically exists, as all that we know, lies within it. God is not a physical person or thing, and only physically exists through people and actions. If God only exists in the hearts and minds of people around the world, who's to say that's nonexistent?...oh...an ignorant, hard-headed Athiest such as yourself. Open your eyes.
kernalbanders 4 months ago
@kernalbanders If the flying spaghetti only exists in the hearts and minds of people around the world, who's to say that's nonexistent?
Excelion333 4 months ago 22
Comment removed
runnekarill 4 months ago
@kernalbanders When you say "hearts" you mean mind I assume since the heart has the purpose of pumping blood. From what you're saying that God only exists in the minds of some people,that is completely correct. The brain is very complex and very complicated, it can make things that are untrue and incorrect seem 100% true and valid. There are those who believe many nonsensical things, and those that are what we consider retarded because of chemical changes and differences in the brain from norm.
ThatFreeThinker 3 months ago
@kernalbanders
STOP preaching & START presenting EVIDENCE to support Your ASSertion.
Belief in the existence of a god is the universal panacea for People who can't cope with reality.
tranquility4all 3 months ago
@kernalbanders If batman lives in my heart it does not make him real, your belief in god is not proof of any kind. I would say we have as much proof he's non existent as you have that he is. Your "proof" that he exists in the hearts of people is funny and it makes me laugh.
Gexx420 2 months ago
@kernalbanders the leading cause of murder is the belief in god. it goes like this
"do you believe in god?" "no" BAM! *dead*
"do you believe in god?" "yes" "do you believe in my god?" "no" BAM! *dead* "MY GOD HAS A BIGGER DICK THAN YOUR GOD!"
yeah you know thats right and completely accurate
freddiebarry93 2 months ago
lmfao this is the first good "joke" video I've seen on youtube
amaira515 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@daNDayati You don't believe cause you choose not to believe. You refuse to believe cause you don't wanna admit that their's consequences for your actions.
VoiceInTheWildern322 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@daNDayati I'm talking about the one true God. The God who was and is and is to come. He who calls himself I Am. Yahweh. Jehovah. Lord of Heaven and Earth. The one true God. You can call me a nut all you want but I'm just speaking the truth. I'm not passing judgement on you as to where your soul will God. Only God can decide that. I'm just trying to deliever a message of hope to you so that you will get saved. I believe because I know God exists.
VoiceInTheWildern322 4 months ago
Who made an complex god that extorts his worshippers
abnormalmeow 4 months ago
This makes me love Jesus even more than I do now.
jones6119 4 months ago
funny but the music is pretty terrible
TheJohnVandivier 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@daNDayati When you get to Judgement and God pronounces judgement on you, just try to say "But your supposed to be imaginary". To know God all you have to do is search for him, accept Jesus Christ as your Lord and Savior and follow God's commands. What's sad and pathetic is someone who blatantly denies the existance of God when they know deep down inside that God does exist.
VoiceInTheWildern322 4 months ago
To funny! I've heard nearly every one of them..
JackFucington 4 months ago
you're a genius. thank you.
oh and i would also like to commend you on your ability to approach this video through the perspective of a pious person... i doubt a christian would ever consider considering our point of view. thank you for not being ignorant.
gypsydeathx 4 months ago
I don't believe in god, and I have had a lot of people actually use some of these on me, and their shear ignorance to use some of the stupid arguments really pissed me off, cause I don't find it funny in some instances to be reminded that the people that use some of the stupid arguments live in the same country as me. I am fine with smart Christians, but where I live, they are few and far between.
TimothyRayMuncy 4 months ago
Hahaha! Love this video! The only people that are matched in fervor with hard core christians is hard core atheists. I dont understand atheists, heck i dont understand some christians.
youfool8181 4 months ago
#32 makes perfect sense if you think like a lot of people, who don't understand assumptions don't work mathematically, because they never properly learned Boolean algebra.
TimothyRayMuncy 4 months ago
@daNDayati That's right. Go ahead and show how just 2 responses have made you mad. I won't lose any sleep cause I know that God is real. Maybe you should try seaching for God. It might do you some good.
VoiceInTheWildern322 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You heard people say- "it will never be found", "it ain't true", "it just can't be".
I'm here to tell you these People are wrong- I found it. Using Google Earth -
I found God's Watermarks of the REAL Garden of Eden. Look at my Channel and see the Video I made of it. I didn't point all of it out either- there are many things still hid for you to find. I even have 3 picture's of God Himself. Come see what He looks like - EPIC !
downyourtube 4 months ago
@daNDayati Well I can sleep at night. Cause I know if I live I have God to see me through the day. If I die, then I get to go to heaven to be with God.
VoiceInTheWildern322 4 months ago
No. This is a video to make atheist laugh until they tinkle in their pants.
Atheists only need one step to pissing off creationist...
1. Show the creationist the evidence.
SuperDuperAtheist 4 months ago
@SuperDuperAtheist Go ahead. Show me the evidence.
VoiceInTheWildern322 4 months ago
I thought this was really funny. Most people don't laugh because it's true though. :)
hiikisono 4 months ago
This guy would Win at ANY athiest,
Thanx bro, it really helped lol :D
xCruzSageZ 4 months ago
how to piss off a christian :)
/watch?v=urlTBBKTO68&list=FL_p7fZ2GdF3rnBIqDIWxvbQ&feature=mh_lolz
jeremythellama1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A better way to make atheists mad is to just flat prove them wrong on everything they say.
VoiceInTheWildern322 4 months ago
I liked number 43 the best and how God does not believe in atheist....Praise the Lord! Although you forgot when "us" Christians give you that look and say....Bless your heart:)
hanzoftexas88 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In the name of Satan, ruler of Earth, the King of the world, the Chief of the Serfs, I command the forces of darkness to bestow their infernal power upon us. Save us, Lord Satan, from the treacherous and the violent. Oh Satan, Spirit of the Earth, God of Liberty, open wide the gates of Hell and come forth from the abyss by these names: Satan! Ba'al Zəbûb! Leviathan! Asmodeus! Abaddon!
JMoMo17101 4 months ago
55. Post a poorly made video using the same sampled song EVERYONE else uses when they don't know how to make a "video"
kicoyfaced91 4 months ago
Comment removed
poundtho 4 months ago
You know here's my take on it. If God and Christ are great, good caring beings, they would be understanding of people. I honestly cannot in my heart honestly say that I believe God exists, or that Christ was his son. On judgement day, when Christ comes back to earth he will see lots of good people, who do the right thing for others with a smile on their faces, but oh, they pursue the truth instead of allowing themselves to be bullied into what others tell them to think, so, hell for them!
cheddercheese99 4 months ago
Christians don't troll, there just stupid and believe everything
Sonyphilia 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
there are some atheists, not all, who think that believing in a higher power is only for ignorant people. these same people claim that science is their "religion." but yet the foundation for "modern day" science was laid down by people like isaac newton and robert boyle, both of whom believed in a higher power. i highly doubt these same atheists would call newton and boyle ignorant or stupid. i am not arguing for or against a higher power. im just merely making a statement that was on my mind.
airt21 4 months ago
@NemonicLee
Oh, sorry, I can't really answer that anymore. I'm an agnostic pantheist. Whats the point in believing in a creator that does nothing? There's no difference between no god, and a sedentary god. LOL So yea, now I'm basically just a polite atheist in disguise.
GuitarMannnnnn 4 months ago
GODIDIT!!!
ApatheticOmniscience 4 months ago
god is man made. deal with it.
dkthg 4 months ago
34) God can not reveal himself with any real proof because that removes the need of faith!
cluengas2k 4 months ago
HAHAHA Acid sarcasm 100% :P good one!
cluengas2k 4 months ago
HAAA, ITS FUNNY BECAUSE ITS TRUE
thealltedrygt 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions of tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 4 months ago
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital structures, organs, reproductive system were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.
Mogley52 4 months ago
@Mogley52 ive been trying to explain that idea to atheists for so long.....they believe in impossible adaptation. they dont understand adaptation constitutes your actions and not your genetics.
DLeeMusik 4 months ago
@DLeeMusik Keep on "explaining" that buddy, cause no one is gonna listen. Evolution is a scientifically verifiable fact whether you like it or not. However, you don't need to be an atheist to accept it. In fact, the Catholic church embraces the theory.
ApatheticOmniscience 4 months ago
@ApatheticOmniscience adaptation is a fact. growing new appendages and changing your entire skeletal structure, respiratory system, circulatory by means of genetic mutations is the opposite of a fact. the catholic church embraces evolution? u mean the same catholic church that says Jesus is the way and then also says the pope is Jesus himself and should be worshiped as God? the same church that places divine characteristics on Mary, promotes idol worship and continues Jesus' sacrifice over and
DLeeMusik 4 months ago
@DLeeMusik I care not for the religious practices of the Catholic church. Your time spent belittling them is meaningless to me. However, adaptation is evolution. Microevolution is only macroevolution on a larger timescale. To argue otherwise would be self-contradictory. Self-contradictory claims belong to the same group you so contemptuously place Catholicism in. So please, don't insult yourself.
ApatheticOmniscience 4 months ago
@ApatheticOmniscience haha u dont care for them but u seem to use them as examples to prove evolution haha how stupid are you. adaptation isnt evolution adaptation is ACTIONS not PHYSICAL CHANGES. microevolution hmmm ok so has any of these bacterial organisms turned into anything other than bacteria? has any micro organism started to turn into anything with a brain cell? to argue otherwise would be self contradictory? contradictory to what? ur the guy in class with no friends whos considered a
DLeeMusik 4 months ago
@DLeeMusik *sigh* You're such a typical creationist. Lacking the basic understanding for the things you so desperately try to disprove.
And now you've resorted to name calling? A "guy in class with no friend"? Are you serious? Is that really your best argument? Can you at least try to act like a human being? Why do all you creationists act the same way? It's getting old dude. Trolling doesn't work on me. I'm sorry, but I have better things rather to waste time educating kids like you
ApatheticOmniscience 4 months ago
@DLeeMusik
You obviously don't understand evolution, however, I pity uneducated members of society, so I'll be courteous enough to help yah out.
Step 1: Go to wikipedia
Step 2: Look up "evolution"
Step 3: Read and enjoy
Hope that helps.
ApatheticOmniscience 4 months ago
@ApatheticOmniscience wikepedia....HAHAHA. i dont talk to idiots like you hahaha you just beat yourself
DLeeMusik 4 months ago
@DLeeMusik As I expected... You refuse to learn. Continue to live as you wish, but blatant idiocy does not fair well in society my friend.
Ehh, at least I can say that I tried, it makes me feel somewhat accomplished. I hope one day you'll seek a proper education and finally be a beneficial member to society. Until then, you're just a troll. A troll that deserves not a second more of my time.. So, I think I'm done here, g'day.
-AO
ApatheticOmniscience 4 months ago
@ApatheticOmniscience keep on believing trillions and trillions of mutations can happen and all be beneficial even though the only mutations around today are retardation and negative effects. keep believing a bacteria cell can create the entire diversity of the earth you idiot. keep being spoon fed. im also receiving a higher education than you with a higher gpa smug little poser.
DLeeMusik 4 months ago
@DLeeMusik it's obviously not "high" enough...
kicoyfaced91 4 months ago
@kicoyfaced91 totally forgot about this was out partying all weekend its halloween go get a life u losers
DLeeMusik 4 months ago
@ApatheticOmniscience "nerd" yet you have no intellect and make irrelevant claims to accusations that havent even been addressed or even implied. its sad. i really feel bad for the "nerds" that arent smart. nothing going for them.
DLeeMusik 4 months ago
@ApatheticOmniscience over again even though its condemned? the same church that contradicts everything it says? the same catholic church that accepts other religions such as taoism, buddhism, even gypsies and fortune tellers as equals? wow evolution must be true then. ha.
DLeeMusik 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life and the universe work don’t mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete and living cell, the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when no directing code or mechanisms existed in nature?
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith science supports. Natural laws explain how an airplane or a cell works, but undirected natural laws cannot bring about either. Once there's a complete cell, the code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell originate when there was no directing code.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENTISTS HAVE NEVER CREATED LIFE. And, even if they do it won't be by chance but by intelligent design. By genetically engineering already existing forms of life, scientists have produced new forms of life, but they did not produce these new life forms from non-living matter. Even in synthetic life, scientists design and build DNA from scratch, through intelligent design, and then insert their man-made DNA into an already living cell. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 4 months ago
HUMAN-CHIMP DNA MYTH: The actual similarity is between 70-87% not 99.8% as commonly believed. The original research stating 99.8% similarity was based on ignoring contradicting evidence. Read the article, "Evaluating the Human-Chimp DNA Myth--New Research Data" at the Institute for Creation Research Site. The similarities are better explained due to a common Designer Who designed similar functions for similar purposes, rather than chance. Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
SURVIVAL OF THE FITTEST prevents macro-evolution. Natural selection wouldn't preserve the evolution of new traits because they wouldn't have any survival value. A partially-evolved hand evolving from a previous trait, partially-evolved tissues, organs, biological structures would make a species unfit for survival. There are no fossils of partially-evolved species. All species of plants and animals in the fossil record are complete and fully-formed. They came into existence as complete!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
MACRO-EVOLUTIONARY LOGIC is similar to seeing an earthquake churn-up a few well-formed rocks and concluding from this that earthquakes, if given enough time, can construct a building. Macro-evolutionists take the little things here and there produced by chance and extrapolate it into something extraordinary and then call it science. Notice, all evolutionists begin with a complete species. They don't begin their theory with partially-evolved species, with partially-evolved tissues and organs.
Mogley52 4 months ago
NEW SPECIES: Although new species have come into existence, they don't carry any new genes. They've become new species only because they can't be crossed back with the original parent stock for various biological reasons. A biological "kind" allows for new species but not new genes. Nature has no ability to invent new genes for new traits. Only limited variations and adaptations are possible in nature, and all strictly within a biological "kind" (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.).
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"JUNK DNA" ISN'T JUNK: Recent research shows that these segments of DNA are vital in regulating gene expression (when, where, and how genes are expressed). There's no room for random mutations to operate safely. Random mutations, from radiation, are destructive. For every good one there would be hundreds of harmful ones with the net effect, over time, causing extinction, not upward evolution. Most variations are from new combinations of already existing genes, not mutations.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HOW DOES DNA MAKE A BODY? When you divide a cake the parts are smaller than the original cake and the cake never gets bigger. When we were a cell and that cell divided, the new cells were the same size as the original cell and we got bigger. New material had to come from somewhere. That new material came from food. The sequence in our DNA directed our mother's food we received in the womb to become new cells forming all the tissues and organs of our body. Read my article: HOW DID MY DNA MAKE ME?
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
HUMAN EMBRYO doesn't have true gills or tail. These and other arguments have long been discarded by most evolutionists and not supported by any modern embryologist. Then, what are these structures? Read "Does The Human Embryo Go Through Animal Stages" at the Institute for Creation Research site. Briefly, what look like gills are early formation of facial and throat regions. What looks like a tail is the coccyx which grows faster than the rest of the body. The coccyx supports the pelvic muscles.
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DISORDER IN THE UNIVERSE is no argument against God's existence. The disorder is because of chance and entropy, but the order can only be rationally explained due to design. If I discovered a broken watch on the ground, the disorder is no evidence that there wasn't a designer behind the watch. Please read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
BURDEN OF PROOF: Anyone who claims the level of complexity and order in life and the universe happened by chance has the burden of proof. Many atheists think they have no burden of proof because they’re not claiming the existence of something. That is not true. Atheists are claiming something. They are claiming that we are here by chance and atheists expect for everyone to accept that claim on faith because they certainly can’t prove it. Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 4 months ago