Somebody should ask her what kind of idiotic designer would install a human eye, "in all its complexity", backwards and upside down or why one third of humans require corrective lenses at some point in their life to make up for failing vision.
Elizabeth Hasselbeck has absolutely NO place talking about anything philosophical, religious, or political, especially after I just heard this.
I thought it was bad enough that she thinks the Earth is 6000-8000 years old, but apparently she had to go all-out in proving her stupidity... She had to use an analogy about fucking DESIGNER BAGS in order to explain her stance against evolution. After watching this video, I am now even more of an atheist than before, and my IQ just decreased 5 points.
God was a Pedophile, Mary was 12 or 13 when she became pregnant. One of Muhammads wives was 6 at marriage and 9 at consummation. Why does the world tolerate religions that are obviously just tools of Child Abusers?
Yes, children and eyes are "perfect," which is why there's no such thing as birth defects, glaucoma, cataracts, etc. Hell, has this idiot never seen a person wearing glasses?
And, since she thinks evolution could apply to fashionwear... has she ever seen a Gucci handbag try to fuck a Prada shoe (or both... TWINS!) to produce Pragucci offspring?
This is why scientists hate creationists. They're being forced to deal with criticisms from people who don't even know what Evolution is (and isn't).
Absolute bull. Wonder how the Americans are ok with such a rampantly stupid character on their television promoting such steaming pile of crap.
systemsbiologist 1 year ago
LOL at you, America. LOL.
bigbowlowrong 1 year ago
Wow..... creationists 1 evolutionists 0
MasterShakeMajor 1 year ago
fick
kinglbkiv 1 year ago
Hmm....I was gonna say something, but I will just leave it at....LAME
M31orNGC224 1 year ago
Somebody should ask her what kind of idiotic designer would install a human eye, "in all its complexity", backwards and upside down or why one third of humans require corrective lenses at some point in their life to make up for failing vision.
BlueThunderFlik 2 years ago
oh dear she watched ray comfort... and actually believed him.
sootandstars 2 years ago
This Chick is a moron.
elvgero15 2 years ago
Elizabeth Hasselbeck has absolutely NO place talking about anything philosophical, religious, or political, especially after I just heard this.
I thought it was bad enough that she thinks the Earth is 6000-8000 years old, but apparently she had to go all-out in proving her stupidity... She had to use an analogy about fucking DESIGNER BAGS in order to explain her stance against evolution. After watching this video, I am now even more of an atheist than before, and my IQ just decreased 5 points.
TheUnpromisedOne 2 years ago
evolution is for dumb ppl.
Narmedor 2 years ago
Yeah Creationizm is for geniuses...okay, yeah rite!
elvgero15 2 years ago
Then why does Hasselback believe in intelligent design?
vidmsc 2 years ago
i believe tim hasselback is the worst qb ever why dont she pray that god gives him a job on an nfl team
acwaiter 2 years ago
God DID design the world and it's creatures. He just took billions of years and used evolution as his tool! OHYEAH!
OhZoneFan 2 years ago 3
NOT!!!
elvgero15 2 years ago
Oh my god, what a ridiculous, simplistic, not to mention tired argument against evolution. Elizabeth is a total moron.
pulvinosophist 3 years ago 12
God was a Pedophile, Mary was 12 or 13 when she became pregnant. One of Muhammads wives was 6 at marriage and 9 at consummation. Why does the world tolerate religions that are obviously just tools of Child Abusers?
jedus1 3 years ago 2
If God is so elegant, complex, and perfect, who designed him?
DigitalVG 3 years ago 7
so who designed god bimbo?
kungfuwookie 3 years ago 3
I think she's a walking testament to the notion that Darwin's theory of only the smart and strong surviving is utterly wrong.
samisyosam 3 years ago 6
Science is the same thing as handbags!
D14BL0 3 years ago 8
Yes, children and eyes are "perfect," which is why there's no such thing as birth defects, glaucoma, cataracts, etc. Hell, has this idiot never seen a person wearing glasses?
And, since she thinks evolution could apply to fashionwear... has she ever seen a Gucci handbag try to fuck a Prada shoe (or both... TWINS!) to produce Pragucci offspring?
This is why scientists hate creationists. They're being forced to deal with criticisms from people who don't even know what Evolution is (and isn't).
ajc06 3 years ago 19
Is this twit really this stupid?
MysteriousTraveler 3 years ago 17
Short answer: Yes.
Long answer: FUCK yes.
TheUnpromisedOne 2 years ago