A part of me wants a real atheist choir, it would be fairly awesome, I could start one but I can't sing for shit. Sure atheism is no more a religion than theism (sure most religions are theistic, but there's even atheistic religion like atheistic Buddhism), but hey, if we couldn't laugh at ourselves then what kind of world would we live in? :P
Okay this is incredibly strange. I'm on the "Atheist Choir" video with all the correct comments, description, like/dislike, uploader etc. However, the video is something I watched earlier despite several refreshes?
it's not that all atheists don't believe in a life after death, only that some believe that what we are told happens after death is not correct. Personally I have mixed ideas of what happens after death, but I find the prospect of a "perfect world" such as heaven is more of a torture than a great place. Well anyway, I don't really believe in any higher plain of existence, but I do have my own ideas of what death really is and where it leads to...but it would take too long to explain.
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
@Mogley52 I think it unlikely that ANY atheists went to read that article, just because you made a glaring error in the title alone. (aside from screaming in all caps like a true christian☺) You have equated not believing in a deity with abiogenisis.
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
Atheism is not the rejection of the possibility of a Deity it is the rejection of all the modern (or not so modern) theorys of god for one very good reason. They're all a load of shite.
Damn that is funny! I will be honest, if I was as grotesquely ugly as all the atheists in your choir, I wouldn't believe in God either!!!!! Thank you God I am not!!! ha, ha, ha!!!!!
As an atheist i have to say this is...fucking hilarious! If this were a joke on the religous, the poster would have been threatened with death. several times.
When you are lying on your death bed waiting for annihilation your last thoughts will be hope of the existence of a God. All religions are flawed. But be assured there is a God. Your life is not nearly as harsh as others in this world.
@brucebu base critical life decisions on the fear of the unknown. Well I guess that's made many billions of the poor's dollars. Really, according to the bible, if you decide to believe in God on your death bed it's already too late anyways. In my experience those who wish to control us by fear are not on our side.
I do not believe in the the Bible. Nor do I believe in the Koran, or any other written form of religion. I refer to the feelings you conjure when you are at the beach and let the sand flow between your fingers and wonder how many grains there are on this beach, on all the beaches. and not even the grains of sand but the atoms that comprise it. The bible is a joke written by men consumed with pride and arrogance. Jesus, the man, did live but he only taught compassion and love.
See, the problem with this new wave of "evangelical atheists" is that they're so grounded in their precious reality that their point defeats itself. If death is really the end, then I see more utility in believing in something. So what if it's not real. We play video games, right?
"But religion causes war."
"So?"
"War ends lives."
"So? Death is a void, they don't feel anything."
Essentially, you'll get them down to: "But I am RIGHT! Why do they get to believe?! I don't!"
@AquaAnalogue An argument over truth has nothing to do with utility. Just because people find believing helps them does not mean it is accurate. War causes suffering in the living. You will also note that most people do not want to die. Atheists argue against religion caused war because it is an unnecessary extension of human suffering and an unnecessary deprivation of people of their right to live.
Theists can be accused of exactly the same thing of asserting, ""But I am RIGHT!"
@1aundulxaldin only the ones that are powerful (the big three, Christianity, Islam, Judaism) because they slaughtered all the ones who didn't believe that.
I can understand the powerful part at that, but I'm asking if specifically all three, in their designated books, command its followers to slaughter people who don't believe them.
This doesn't have to be interpreted as being pro-atheism. It as saying that while atheists claim to be independent and free of religion, they proselytize and act in many ways not so different then the most fundamental of Christians. Besides, the whole thing was just a set up for the Church of England joke.
I am a Christian and I find this video absolutely hilarious cause it shows just how wacked out some of the Militant Social Lefties are. The Joke Is on you.
No wooden box for me. Waste of good material. Whatever parts of me that can be used is going to those still alive that need it, with the stipulation that young children get first dibs. I'd prefer the rest be tossed in a ditch so some wild animals and bugs could have a 5-star meal for once in their lives, but barring any extreme changes of legality, I'm settling with donating the rest to science.
Yeah- But don't forget, Spitting Image were the masters of the 'Double Mock'- Start out mocking the whole American Bible Belt movement - and wind up taking the pithe out of the Secular Humanists as well.
@staffiedog44 don's see anything depressing about it. This is the sort of thing we need nowadays. With books like Dawkins, Dennett and Hitchens, people are thinking that us Atheists are starting to become an oxymoronic religion. We do see the funny side of the oxymoron, and this song sums it up perffectly.
A part of me wants a real atheist choir, it would be fairly awesome, I could start one but I can't sing for shit. Sure atheism is no more a religion than theism (sure most religions are theistic, but there's even atheistic religion like atheistic Buddhism), but hey, if we couldn't laugh at ourselves then what kind of world would we live in? :P
LittleNorsePrince 18 hours ago
I'm sorry - you still haven't sold me.
I'm by no means religious and simply can not uphold blind faith that a superior being does not exist.
TimBell87 1 week ago
1:43 made my day.
NerdyIncorporated 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
@NerdyIncorporated I agree. I think I hurt myself laughing.
195ashes 4 days ago
Okay this is incredibly strange. I'm on the "Atheist Choir" video with all the correct comments, description, like/dislike, uploader etc. However, the video is something I watched earlier despite several refreshes?
God's obviously punishing me. lol
NerdyIncorporated 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
HAIL ATHEISTS!
glhmtv 1 month ago 2
I have long believed that we atheists ought to have some sort of cult. Like for example thanking ourselves for the food in front of us!
alanheath2 1 month ago
Clapping my hands over here.
AmericanAviator 1 month ago
1.13 there's a guy wearing jeans under
miyavizim 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Think you could correct the title? The word is "atheist" and not "athiest."
Lots of religious/philosophical terms end in "-ist." You know, like "BuddhIST" and "humanIST" and "JainIST" and "theIST." Same thing for "atheIST."
lease2coach1 2 months ago
Incorrect, I'm not going to just rot in a wooden box when I die.
My will specifically says to catapult me into a minefield so I can't come back as a zombie.
Alexc3217 2 months ago
Who thinks they would get away with this on TV these super sensitive, PC infected days.
p165711 2 months ago
@p165711 TV isn't sensitive, at least not here in the uk...Jonathon Ross said Niggers on tv twice in front of Chris Rock and nobody gave a shit.
Thisismytrollingface 2 months ago
Oh, how I wish they'd bring back Spitting Image, can you imagine the amount of puppets they'd have to make?
Tarynus 3 months ago
I don't get the "and join the Church of England"
Dodec84 4 months ago
@Dodec84 My best guess is that that means the Church of England is so moribund that being a member is pretty much the same thing as being an atheist.
kentamitchell 3 months ago
I would support the establishment of an atheist Church- despite how it goes against our principles- just so this song could be sung daily!
NerdyIncorporated 4 months ago
it's not that all atheists don't believe in a life after death, only that some believe that what we are told happens after death is not correct. Personally I have mixed ideas of what happens after death, but I find the prospect of a "perfect world" such as heaven is more of a torture than a great place. Well anyway, I don't really believe in any higher plain of existence, but I do have my own ideas of what death really is and where it leads to...but it would take too long to explain.
mouseycou 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE SCIENTIFIC CASE AGAINST ATHEISM: Please read this Internet article of mine published in Russia's English Pravda. It will be a real eye-opener for all who think belief in a Creator is merely subjective blind faith. Also read my article, LIFE ON MARS NO SURPRISE (In the Earth's past there was powerful volcanic activity which spewed life-containing dirt and rocks (meteors) into outer space. Mars may literally have millions tons of Earth soil)
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How were species living and reproducing if their vital structures, organs, reproductive systems hadn't evolved yet? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic/biological similarities between species
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DAWKINS, HITCHENS, AND HAWKING REFUSE TO DEBATE with creationists who are SCIENTISTS, such as the scientists at The Institute for Creation Research. Dawkins and his friends only debate non-scientist creationists. Read articles by scientists supporting creation at The Institute for Creation Research site. Read analysis from creation scientists about the latest news on fossils, genetics, astronomy, etc. that you won't read in the main stream media. Visit the Institute for Creation Research site.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WHAT IS SCIENCE? Science simply is knowledge based on observation. No one observed the universe coming by chance or by design, by creation or by macro-evolution. These are positions of faith. The issue is which faith the scientific evidence best supports. Natural laws can explain how an airplane or living cell works, but it's irrational to believe that mere undirected natural laws can bring about either. Read my Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
THE ODDS of the sequence of molecules in a cell coming together by chance are similar to the odds of magnetic letters randomly bonding together in a sequence to form all the words and sentences in a dictionary. Without the right sequence, a cell's molecules won't work. Amino acids can come by chance but not proteins. Without DNA there can be no proteins and vice versa. Gradually won't do. It's all at once or not at all for a cell's survival. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
@Mogley52 I think it unlikely that ANY atheists went to read that article, just because you made a glaring error in the title alone. (aside from screaming in all caps like a true christian☺) You have equated not believing in a deity with abiogenisis.
y0nd3r 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION DOESN'T PRODUCE ANYTHING. It can only "select" from what is produced that has survival value. If a variation occurs that helps a species survive, that survival is called being "selected." That's all it is. There's no conscious selection by nature. It's a passive process. Natural selection is a figure of speech. The term itself is a tautology. Natural selection only operates once there is life and reproduction, not before. Read my article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NATURAL SELECTION IS NO BLIND WATCHMAKER because it can only "select," not produce or arrange. If a variation survives, that's called being "selected." Natural selection operates only once there is life and reproduction, not before, so it couldn't have been involved in life's origins. A partially-evolved cell (an oxymoron) would quickly disintegrate. It couldn't wait ("survive") millions of years for chance to complete it and then make it alive! Read: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ARE FOSSILS REALLY MILLIONS OF YEARS OLD? Popular Internet article examines assumptions concerning fossil deposition as well as built-in assumptions involved in modern radiometric dating (not used for dating fossils but other rocks), and arguments from starlight and time. Discusses lack of true transitional forms in the fossil record and lack of "age" sequence of the fossil layers. Discussion of mixed species (i.e. dinosaur, reptile, mammal fossils in the same stratum).
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
GENETIC INFORMATION CANNOT HAPPEN BY CHANCE, so it's more logical to believe that genetic similarities between all forms of life are due to a common Designer who designed similar functions for similar purposes. It doesn't mean all forms of life are biologically related! Also, "Junk DNA" isn't junk. These non-coding segments of DNA have recently been found to be vital in regulating gene expression. Read my popular Internet article: HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!
Mogley52 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
DO EYES CARRY SCARS OF EVOLUTION? Read this fantastic Internet article by biologist and creationist Brian Thomas. Thomas refutes every argument of a "flawed" design for the eye, and explains how and why the so-called flaw is actually the best thing for the eye. Read the article! It's amazing what facts evolutionists will ignore. Numerous times evolutionists have been proven wrong about their interpretation of a structure as being flawed or useless.
Mogley52 5 months ago
Atheism is not the rejection of the possibility of a Deity it is the rejection of all the modern (or not so modern) theorys of god for one very good reason. They're all a load of shite.
TheAxeMixa 5 months ago 3
It is depressing be an atheist and to assume that this life is all you have
wafaguevara 6 months ago
@wafaguevara is not. it makes us appreciate life more.
georgemiser 5 months ago
@wafaguevara Unfortunately theories are not based on how depressing their results are...
thesidinator 5 months ago
@wafaguevara depressing yes true but atleast your not a lying asshole
WeLikeDanceMusic 5 months ago
A WOODEN BOX!
SCRulerShinoda 7 months ago
As a Catholic, I find this hilarious...
julesthemadman 7 months ago
@julesthemadman Ditto.... x
SpudaGerkins 6 months ago
the jordan river does exist. my poppa's been there
sunonthewindow 7 months ago
@sunonthewindow
metaphor....slaps head....:(
lostlemming 6 months ago
I don't believe in God! *CLAP*
I don't trust the Lord! *CLAP*
I reject the possibility of a deity! *CLAP*
Oh, wait, I hate singing. Sorry, this isn't for me.
NerdyIncorporated 7 months ago 2
Wait, isn't the Jordan River an actual river?
TehFrickinPope 7 months ago
Best choir song ever. Haven't heard in about 15 years. Thanks for posting.
jamesstafforduk 8 months ago
"And join the Church of England"
Spot on. That organisation is just like the Tory party . But with more pointy hats and surpressed homosexuality.
JONNOG88 9 months ago 3
Steve Martin doesn't know either Rock and Roll or Heavy Metal then.
Professor6871 9 months ago
Steve Martin jokingly sings that "atheists don't have no songs." Well, he hasn't heard this one evidently.
judypooty 10 months ago
Steve Martin jokingly sings that "atheists don't have no songs." Well, he hasn't heard this one evidently.
judypooty 10 months ago
Comment removed
Barristered 1 year ago
@Barristered
And who wants to be ruled by hippos!
maxime32 11 months ago 3
@maxime32 Bahaha!!!!!
DuncanHennessy 10 months ago
'and join the Church of England' - lmfao
jasonfkg 1 year ago 20
This is fabulous! Thank you so much. so funny!
GodlessMorality 1 year ago
Remember when you would go to your youtube page and shake your ass on camera?
Remember when you would upload it and people would hate you or masterbate?
Remember when you liked cottage cheese?
Remember when you would smear it all over your naked body?
Remember two girls and a cup? That shit was funny.
WE MISS THE OLD YOUTUBE!
Post this in every video and lets start a youtube masterbationfest!!!
Originally made by Jack Dupuis.
Thumbs up to keep this at top of the page.
crazycreators 1 year ago
Is there a significance to the jars of M & M's?
themysteriouscrumpet 1 year ago
@themysteriouscrumpet
Could be jars of Smarties! Brits had these back then before M& Ms
trancemanic 1 year ago
@themysteriouscrumpet sugar coating stuff.
spannerotoole 1 year ago
Whatever happend to Spitting Image? I looooved it. Why isTV not funny any-more?
And what happened, by the way, to that god-damned cursor here? I can't see where I'm typing.
ridelo 1 year ago
well halleloonia
helihobbit 1 year ago
Damn that is funny! I will be honest, if I was as grotesquely ugly as all the atheists in your choir, I wouldn't believe in God either!!!!! Thank you God I am not!!! ha, ha, ha!!!!!
crystoltopaz 1 year ago
This is awesome, I miss Spitting Image so much. TV is so shit now.
mirandabone 1 year ago
I don't believe in a god, but I'm open to the possibility that those creepy puppet people are straight from the bowels of hell. *shudder*
melosebrainuhoh 1 year ago
As an atheist i have to say this is...fucking hilarious! If this were a joke on the religous, the poster would have been threatened with death. several times.
martintod2006 1 year ago
@martintod2006 spitting image was great, firing on all cylinders at all fronts! :)
BVargas78 1 year ago
When you are lying on your death bed waiting for annihilation your last thoughts will be hope of the existence of a God. All religions are flawed. But be assured there is a God. Your life is not nearly as harsh as others in this world.
brucebu 1 year ago
@brucebu base critical life decisions on the fear of the unknown. Well I guess that's made many billions of the poor's dollars. Really, according to the bible, if you decide to believe in God on your death bed it's already too late anyways. In my experience those who wish to control us by fear are not on our side.
TheHouseBlog 1 year ago
@TheHouseBlog
I do not believe in the the Bible. Nor do I believe in the Koran, or any other written form of religion. I refer to the feelings you conjure when you are at the beach and let the sand flow between your fingers and wonder how many grains there are on this beach, on all the beaches. and not even the grains of sand but the atoms that comprise it. The bible is a joke written by men consumed with pride and arrogance. Jesus, the man, did live but he only taught compassion and love.
brucebu 1 year ago
@brucebu "jesus" was one of many charleton's of his time......get the book Man Made God by Barbara G. Walker or books about jesus from DM Murdock.
New Testement author's knew what the old test. said, and the jesus story........well that is all it is, a story
MrAtheoi 1 year ago
See, the problem with this new wave of "evangelical atheists" is that they're so grounded in their precious reality that their point defeats itself. If death is really the end, then I see more utility in believing in something. So what if it's not real. We play video games, right?
"But religion causes war."
"So?"
"War ends lives."
"So? Death is a void, they don't feel anything."
Essentially, you'll get them down to: "But I am RIGHT! Why do they get to believe?! I don't!"
AquaAnalogue 1 year ago
@AquaAnalogue An argument over truth has nothing to do with utility. Just because people find believing helps them does not mean it is accurate. War causes suffering in the living. You will also note that most people do not want to die. Atheists argue against religion caused war because it is an unnecessary extension of human suffering and an unnecessary deprivation of people of their right to live.
Theists can be accused of exactly the same thing of asserting, ""But I am RIGHT!"
Mouldywart 1 year ago
@Mouldywart wing
dragonwar524 1 year ago
@dragonwar524 oh why wasnt it underneath it :*(
dragonwar524 1 year ago
I miss Spitting Image *so* much!
kentamitchell 1 year ago
SUPERB PARODY!!!
darwincity 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Ridiculous, just... atheists don't have moral
Loiginer 1 year ago
@Loiginer athiests don't have morals?
so because i'm not living in fear of pissing off some invisible child-killing couche bag I have no morals?
you are a fool.
everybody already has morals and feelings for their fellow man hardwired into their brain.
its the priests (of all religions) who teach us to throw some of those morals.
particularly teaching us to hate everybody who doesn't worship their god.
Zekkandgrant13 1 year ago 3
@Zekkandgrant13
Wait, so all religions specifically say that you should hate everybody who doesn't worship their god?
1aundulxaldin 8 months ago
@1aundulxaldin only the ones that are powerful (the big three, Christianity, Islam, Judaism) because they slaughtered all the ones who didn't believe that.
Zekkandgrant13 8 months ago
@Zekkandgrant13
I can understand the powerful part at that, but I'm asking if specifically all three, in their designated books, command its followers to slaughter people who don't believe them.
1aundulxaldin 8 months ago
@1aundulxaldin
in some way yes, Christianity in particular it says so clearly
Zekkandgrant13 8 months ago
@Zekkandgrant13
"in some way," what kind of way, exactly? Does it say it in a verse?
1aundulxaldin 8 months ago
@1aundulxaldin yes, just not straight out like "go kil sum bitchez" its a little hidden, but still easy to spot.
Zekkandgrant13 8 months ago
Puppets have rights and religious freedoms!
Darryld1 1 year ago
I am an athiest There is not enought Scientific evidence to prove that there is a god. Seeing is beliving.
disneysongtape 1 year ago
and join the church of England LOL
scottishlowoflow 1 year ago 2
cool song... creepy puppets!
adamrose961 1 year ago
I'm sure I saw Richard Dawkins in there somewhere!
densaner77 1 year ago
This doesn't have to be interpreted as being pro-atheism. It as saying that while atheists claim to be independent and free of religion, they proselytize and act in many ways not so different then the most fundamental of Christians. Besides, the whole thing was just a set up for the Church of England joke.
Dereich75 1 year ago
@Dereich75
Yeah Dereich, I'm guessing half of these posters don't even know or have ever seen "Spitting Image" when it was airing on the Beeb.
When I was in Canada, I used to watch it ... Religiously, hehehe.
PantsDestroyer 1 year ago
@Dereich75 Proselytizing Atheism like Fundamental Christians is a recent activity. It is the only way to combat Fundamentalist Christians.
theshadowify 1 year ago 2
@PantsDestroyer. Are there Unicorns where you live?
MutantTyrant 1 year ago
@MutantTyrant
Is Mickey your neighbor?
PantsDestroyer 1 year ago
@MutantTyrant
meh, yeah, the same way you showed me Unicorns...
PantsDestroyer 1 year ago
I am a Christian and I find this video absolutely hilarious cause it shows just how wacked out some of the Militant Social Lefties are. The Joke Is on you.
PantsDestroyer 1 year ago
@PantsDestroyer erm not really. seeing as everyone finds it funny
BOOSHBOYDOM 1 year ago
@PantsDestroyer Getting the obvious joke fail.
JonnyBoyMach2 1 year ago
@JonnyBoyMach2
Oh I get the joke, and if you look closer the joke is on you.
PantsDestroyer 1 year ago
@PantsDestroyer Wow. Boy did you show me . . . except . . . erm. What does that even mean?
JonnyBoyMach2 1 year ago
@JonnyBoyMach2
erm, well hey? Backatcha Sport. Unicorns? Do you have them where you live? Sounds like it.
PantsDestroyer 1 year ago
@PantsDestroyer Sure is huh idiot?
Christian121y 1 year ago
I want this played on the radio in the Deep South US. :) But then, I also want to strike gold in the back yard. The latter is more likely.
fishcat42 1 year ago 2
No wooden box for me. Waste of good material. Whatever parts of me that can be used is going to those still alive that need it, with the stipulation that young children get first dibs. I'd prefer the rest be tossed in a ditch so some wild animals and bugs could have a 5-star meal for once in their lives, but barring any extreme changes of legality, I'm settling with donating the rest to science.
TechnomancerMorhion 1 year ago 3
no annoying religious nuts have posted insults yet?
its a miracle!!
trafficlights1 1 year ago 77
@trafficlights1 Wait till it gets 5000 + views . . . . then you know it's going to kick off.
JonnyBoyMach2 1 year ago
@trafficlights1 HALELUJA! ALL PRAISE FSM!!
LOLDISNEYLAND 1 year ago
@trafficlights1
Yeah- But don't forget, Spitting Image were the masters of the 'Double Mock'- Start out mocking the whole American Bible Belt movement - and wind up taking the pithe out of the Secular Humanists as well.
Subtle but Very Clever.
flashart 11 months ago 3
@trafficlights1 No it's not lol.
animegalc4 10 months ago
@trafficlights1 That is truely a miracle there. Praise be to God!
Professor6871 9 months ago
Have you ever notice at 0:35 that no puppet heads were used for extra-long shots, only puppeteers and impressionists' heads?
alexelliottwelch 1 year ago
A great song (although I agree it's a bit depressing).
Thanks for uploading this. Keep up the good work.
staffiedog44 2 years ago 32
Sort of. At least we get this one precious and beautiful life, free of cosmic Big Brothers, and that's enough to make my cup runneth over many times.
TithonusSyndrome 1 year ago 5
@staffiedog44 don's see anything depressing about it. This is the sort of thing we need nowadays. With books like Dawkins, Dennett and Hitchens, people are thinking that us Atheists are starting to become an oxymoronic religion. We do see the funny side of the oxymoron, and this song sums it up perffectly.
Oolon42Colluphid 1 year ago 18