You should go back to google earth (Moon looking) and type in Nobile and look real close to that one. And it's neighbore Amundsen. Also the Lyman crater has soemthing that looks like it's sticking out of the surface. (By the dark shadows) I found another one of interest, but I forgot where I saw it. I could kick myself for not marking it or writting down the location.
Also, magnified .jpgs in their compressed format pixelate heavily as well as symmetrically on zooms of this scale. You can basically see squares, rectangles of whatever you want throughout the landscape at that quality.
Consider using high-res TIFF and BMP images for better resolution that much more closely resembles the original image. A .jpeg is far faaaaaaar too lossy.
might need a powerful telescope to zoom in at least a few thousand miles into the moon. It's inbetween the Deseilligny crater, the Dorsa Lister, The Dorsum Nicol, and Rimae Menelaus. We'll need to go to an observatorium to look it up. Only they have the equipment to see it.
If you're in an university that has an observatorium or work in one, or live near one, it's worth checking it out.
y is the image so unclear?????? its 2010 !!!!!!!
Android5555 2 years ago
wouldnt that be a kick in the head to find out mankind had some time in the past been to the moon before? ya know, like a million years ago?
EarthsGravitySucks 2 years ago 2
You should go back to google earth (Moon looking) and type in Nobile and look real close to that one. And it's neighbore Amundsen. Also the Lyman crater has soemthing that looks like it's sticking out of the surface. (By the dark shadows) I found another one of interest, but I forgot where I saw it. I could kick myself for not marking it or writting down the location.
artfan126 2 years ago
Also, magnified .jpgs in their compressed format pixelate heavily as well as symmetrically on zooms of this scale. You can basically see squares, rectangles of whatever you want throughout the landscape at that quality.
Consider using high-res TIFF and BMP images for better resolution that much more closely resembles the original image. A .jpeg is far faaaaaaar too lossy.
StargodArbiter 2 years ago
Water damage on the film emulsion. There are several other, smaller blotches throughout the area that are nigh identical and smaller in scale.
The original reel from this very same sequence of images doesn't even have the water damage on it - only the one captured in 1990 does.
This is a bogus find.
StargodArbiter 2 years ago
I would like to see this original reel. Source?
ArcanineKing 2 years ago
By "original reel" I think he means the lunar orbiter imagery from 1966. It does not show this object.
But all that means is that it wasn't there in 1966 and it was there in 1990. A building might have been constructed in that time.
I would also be curious to know if it's still there now. Maybe someone with a telescope would like to take a look?
t3z2pulm 2 years ago
might need a powerful telescope to zoom in at least a few thousand miles into the moon. It's inbetween the Deseilligny crater, the Dorsa Lister, The Dorsum Nicol, and Rimae Menelaus. We'll need to go to an observatorium to look it up. Only they have the equipment to see it.
If you're in an university that has an observatorium or work in one, or live near one, it's worth checking it out.
ArcanineKing 2 years ago
Nice Find!!!
EmeraldAisle 2 years ago
its probably from the apllo mission
chocoboridley 2 years ago