In my homework I had f(x,y)=3x-2y with the constraint g(x)=x^2+2y^2=44. After solving, my x values were +6 and -6 and my y values were +2 and -2. My question is, how do I figure out the order to put those values into the original function to find the answer? I tried to put them in like f(6,2)=3(6)-2(2) to get max= 14 and f(-6,-2)=3(-6)-2(-2) to get min = -14 and I got it wrong (it's min = -22 and max = 22). Any ideas? My final is tomorrow and this is one of the only things I am stuck on.
YOU ARE AMAZING ! I always watch your videos and learn from them , and I always recommend my friends to watch your videos. I don't know what to do without you !! MAY GOD MAKE YOUR LIFE LONGER !
yeah seriously, i know i've said this before and everyone else on this video has, but i seriously love you. i'm going to find a way to worship you in real life.
What if you have three variables (x, y, and lambda) in one of your partial derivatives? How do you go about solving for x and y and then plugging those into the partial derivative for lambda?.
For example I have:
fx = 2x + 4y - lambda = 0
fy = 4x - lamba = 0
f(lambda) = -x - y + 100 = 0
If I solve fx to get one variable on the left I will end up with two on the right. Then it just gets messy when I plug that variable into the partial derivative for lambda. Please help anyone :)
All through the video I though it was plainly obvious that all the TVs should be made in factory A. Then I did 6(90^2) and compared it to 6(60^2) + 12(30^2) and saw the latter was a lot smaller. Facepalm! Thanks Patrick - I just wanted an introduction to Lagrange multipliers and this was fantastic.
@patrickJMT Sorry it was meant to be past tense, I thought you taught at the lousiville and vanderbuilt universaties. I was just wondering which method you used to teach because it seems to work. I did a maths course last semester which used powerpoint slides and relied on your videos for comprehension (which I thank you greatly for).
@gumlese oh yes, i did used to teach at those places. i never used slides or a projector; i always hated that method as a student. but it was the traditional ' writing on the board and talking ' method. not the most effective i think honestly, but that is how they wanted it done.
@patrickJMT I hope its because you are making a living with youtube and that you didnt get fired. (if I remember correctly you were teaching not to long ago)
Dude, you know what? You are a genius.. I wish you were my professor.. Anyway, do you have any lecture on optimization by differentiation?? I'm really having hard time on this topic.
you should work out harder problems in your examples. Like ones where the system of equations doesn't work out so well. or where there are multiple critical points. that shit always gets me...
At our school, we learned a different agorithm, but it's all the same thing really. (Setting grad(f) to lambda*grad(g) and g=k) and then 2 more steps for specific cases
i need a more involved book in mathematics and calculus and statistics. in theories and so on. i need to get more involved in it. but i couldn't find any in my country please help me :)
You know what? The Calculus book I use goes about solving lagrange multipliers in a different way which confused me. Then I found this video and an epiphany happened.
correct me if im wrong, im quite new to this topic...so im guessing the 3 variable one would be using the same procedure? so instead of having F(x,y,lamda) like in this case, u'd have F(x,y,z,lamda)?
I have a Calc final tonight, and I'm learning off all your videos. My college professor is absolutely TERRIBLE so I'm learning off your videos. HA YAH! THANKS!
You are THE MAN!!! ive been struggling to do la grange for like 2 months now and its nearly exams. i thought i was screwed! watching this 10 min video i could answer all the questions easily!! Thank you very much <<from Mechanical Engineering student from New Zealand.
You and Sal are both good men. My lecturer is just damn lousy compares to you.
The lecturers in uni don't know how to teach. Very sad. They are too relax in their office thinking of tricking students without proper explanation. This is the man. Rock.
Patrick, why are you subtracting the lambda part of the equation instead of adding? In the end it doesn't matter whether you add or subtract it because it equals 0, but is there something I'm missing?
seriously, im a german economics-student and learn this from an american guy! :D i like the way you explain things. its very useful! best regards from germany.
Wow!! you are amazing! tomorrow is our final exam in math and I dont really understand a thing.. but thanks to you.. Everything is clear now. Thank you so much..
PatrickJMT, you are the savior of many a calculus student. You are a superior teacher to tons of professors including top tier schools. Please take these comments as motivation to keep providing quality instruction to the masses.
@naras987 Honestly, I completely agree. I go to class, write down the title of the lecture, then come and search these videos and the ones on Khan Academy and learn from those!
use the lagrange's multiplier to calculate the minimum and maximum volume of a woman's breast F(x,y,z)=2X+y^4-5z under the constraints between D cup and DD. (5marks)
Just wanted to say thank you for posting these. My prof. teaches from the book and the book is very confusing. Your videos helped me pass calc 2 and have already helped me immensely with calc 3.
thanks a lot for these videos, in this one can we compute this equation to get maximums or minimums ? or we can only define it by doing that final test?
I'm really confused as to when you would subtract or add lambda... this video shows to subtract lambda when we want to maximize--what's the case when we would ADD lambda to f(x, y)?
just wanted to say man, i've been watching your videos ever since calc I and have never watched one of your videos and felt like i still didn't understand something. im almost done with my minor in mathematics and to be honest, i think i would've quit trying to be an engineer a long time ago if it wasn't for you. keep it up!
dude .... yo the man .... bro..... just did a crazy exponential function saddle point question using one of yo videos as a guide ...... thanks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
to verify if the critical points i've obtained through this method i've always used the second derivative criteria, or the hessian criteria. And it's not so dificult at all.
Wow. I wish I would have found you earlier! My Calc final is tomorrow and I've literally just been going through all your videos. This seriously is amazing. It makes a huge difference when you can try a problem and then watch someone do it step by step. Thanks so much!
There is a flaw in the proof in 1:43-1:46 and 7:52-8:48. In principle, the stationary point (x,y)=(60,30), i.e, where the gradient vanishes, could have been a saddle point, and therefore neither a maximum nor a minimum. To finish the proof, one would therefore have to check the boundary cases (x,y)=(90,0) and (x,y)=(0,90) as well.
this video was very helpful. you sir are the reason im doing good in my cal 3 class. i really appreciate you taking the time and effort to post all these videos and sharing your knowledge with the rest of us. for some reason the way you break all this down makes me understand the subject matter so much better.
thank you so much, you explain it so simply, its perfect!
CatchPhraseLingo 3 days ago
@CatchPhraseLingo wonderful : )
patrickJMT 3 days ago
Legen...wait for it.......DAry!
137redeemer 1 week ago
i love you
leah3002 2 weeks ago
This is better than my colleges in my native tongue!
StKamer 2 weeks ago
Thank you!!! Finally, I got an idea on what to do on our Lagrange assignment! :D
apnr19 4 weeks ago
THANK YOU! wow, away with lecturers in uni!
fzkenya 4 weeks ago
In my homework I had f(x,y)=3x-2y with the constraint g(x)=x^2+2y^2=44. After solving, my x values were +6 and -6 and my y values were +2 and -2. My question is, how do I figure out the order to put those values into the original function to find the answer? I tried to put them in like f(6,2)=3(6)-2(2) to get max= 14 and f(-6,-2)=3(-6)-2(-2) to get min = -14 and I got it wrong (it's min = -22 and max = 22). Any ideas? My final is tomorrow and this is one of the only things I am stuck on.
KimJong7hrill 1 month ago
Up all night studying for my vector calculus final in the morning. You rock, dude!
seinfan9 1 month ago
Ive been watching your videos since i was in calculus 2 no words can express how grateful i am to u111 thnks man!11
21esanch 1 month ago
This was the only topic I didn't really understand for my final tomorrow. You're a life saver.
samehl11 1 month ago
Hey Patrick. Isn't it supposed to be f(x,y,z) + k(g(x,y,z) - c)? K being lambda.
Thanks for all the videos btw :D
lXxxAXMAGxxXl 1 month ago
@lXxxAXMAGxxXl Isn't that the case with a constrained minimization problem which involves inequalities?
system3142 1 month ago
YOU ARE AMAZING ! I always watch your videos and learn from them , and I always recommend my friends to watch your videos. I don't know what to do without you !! MAY GOD MAKE YOUR LIFE LONGER !
Mathiology 1 month ago
yeah seriously, i know i've said this before and everyone else on this video has, but i seriously love you. i'm going to find a way to worship you in real life.
ApostasyXVIII 1 month ago 6
@ApostasyXVIII a shrine with some candles works
patrickJMT 1 month ago 15
This made no sense in class...You taught me how to do it in 5 minutes...THANK YOU!
katiesmith1776 2 months ago
and thanks for ure clear and understandable hand writing
dtclaudia88 2 months ago
Thanks a lot!!!!
dtclaudia88 2 months ago
what about the hessian matrix?
PCGamerPortal 2 months ago
thanks man... this really help me..
TheKawaiiKajika 2 months ago
I will spread the gospel of Patrick the Great!!!!!
lobsidedballs 2 months ago 2
@lobsidedballs thanks! tell everyone you meet about the videos. EVERYONE!! : )
patrickJMT 2 months ago
What if you have three variables (x, y, and lambda) in one of your partial derivatives? How do you go about solving for x and y and then plugging those into the partial derivative for lambda?.
For example I have:
fx = 2x + 4y - lambda = 0
fy = 4x - lamba = 0
f(lambda) = -x - y + 100 = 0
If I solve fx to get one variable on the left I will end up with two on the right. Then it just gets messy when I plug that variable into the partial derivative for lambda. Please help anyone :)
KimJong7hrill 2 months ago
Dude, I fucking love you
JdkParkour 2 months ago 3
Thanks for putting a minimum example - it unlocked my thinking that whenever we use LaGrange method we need to find a maximum. Thank you!
travelleraroundworld 2 months ago
@travelleraroundworld very welcome!
patrickJMT 2 months ago
All through the video I though it was plainly obvious that all the TVs should be made in factory A. Then I did 6(90^2) and compared it to 6(60^2) + 12(30^2) and saw the latter was a lot smaller. Facepalm! Thanks Patrick - I just wanted an introduction to Lagrange multipliers and this was fantastic.
LAnonHubbard 3 months ago
@patrickJMT haha thanks, it might not be a fast method but it certainly works like your videos!
gumlese 3 months ago
Thanks so much for this. Calc 3 seemed impossible until I found your vids. Keep it up!
drumline064 3 months ago
@patrickJMT Sorry it was meant to be past tense, I thought you taught at the lousiville and vanderbuilt universaties. I was just wondering which method you used to teach because it seems to work. I did a maths course last semester which used powerpoint slides and relied on your videos for comprehension (which I thank you greatly for).
gumlese 3 months ago
@gumlese oh yes, i did used to teach at those places. i never used slides or a projector; i always hated that method as a student. but it was the traditional ' writing on the board and talking ' method. not the most effective i think honestly, but that is how they wanted it done.
patrickJMT 3 months ago
@patrickJMT for lectures do you use slides or a projector and go through material like you do on video?
gumlese 3 months ago
@gumlese what do you mean ' for lectures ' ? i am not employed by a school / college / university
patrickJMT 3 months ago
@patrickJMT what does it mean when a contradiction occurs?
lolliholic256 3 months ago
@patrickJMT I hope its because you are making a living with youtube and that you didnt get fired. (if I remember correctly you were teaching not to long ago)
kx32ta1 3 months ago
@kx32ta1 ha, no i did not get fired. : ) i quit
patrickJMT 3 months ago
the Bob Dylan of math
tsg162 3 months ago
@tsg162 let me just say, i do not care for bob dylan. i would like to like him, but i just can not.
patrickJMT 3 months ago
you are AMAZING. THANK YOU!!!
AssassinsCreedVids 3 months ago
Dude, you know what? You are a genius.. I wish you were my professor.. Anyway, do you have any lecture on optimization by differentiation?? I'm really having hard time on this topic.
inspectorsufyan 3 months ago
@inspectorsufyan he does, just search around a little bit.
lolliholic256 3 months ago
you should work out harder problems in your examples. Like ones where the system of equations doesn't work out so well. or where there are multiple critical points. that shit always gets me...
rightyourwrong 3 months ago
Thank you so much! It really helped me a lot. I really suck at maths and this made it a little easier for me. Thank you.
ondra38 3 months ago
lol I like how you say lagrange. Lagraaaange
mliniman 4 months ago
A hero. A hero, I say!
queenlily2356 4 months ago 24
@queenlily2356 : )
patrickJMT 4 months ago
Thx, very useful. Do you have videos for second-order conditions for max and min as well?
anderscarlsson21 4 months ago
Thanks, this help me a lot.
meakos 4 months ago
Thanks so much :)
Milioo93 4 months ago
Comment removed
anderscarlsson21 4 months ago
thanks for the help! definetly good review for my third year microeconomics class
sugarvenom435 4 months ago
thanks for the help! definetly good review for my third year microeconomics class
sugarvenom435 4 months ago
wow!!! thank u for this video... i've learned a lot... =)
challebbe 5 months ago
why is he subtracting f(x,y) and lambda g(x,y) and not adding them?
cbusoh21 5 months ago
@cbusoh21
It's equivalent (your landa = - his landa), but It makes more sense to say minus if you look at how this formula came about.
lolololort 5 months ago
mind=blown...subscibed.
jamieclarke321 5 months ago
At our school, we learned a different agorithm, but it's all the same thing really. (Setting grad(f) to lambda*grad(g) and g=k) and then 2 more steps for specific cases
PatronRick 5 months ago
i need a more involved book in mathematics and calculus and statistics. in theories and so on. i need to get more involved in it. but i couldn't find any in my country please help me :)
0554844777 5 months ago
thanks a lot, now i unterderstand langrange :)
Keya82 6 months ago
you are seriously the LaGrange to my Multipliers <3
solelytocomment 6 months ago
nice stick people drawings :)
ilovetvb 6 months ago
dammit youtube I accidentally refreshed the page I dont want to see another AD!!!!
yucky1336 6 months ago
is there a video of this but instead you are finding the maximum?
tamubasketball 6 months ago
You know what? The Calculus book I use goes about solving lagrange multipliers in a different way which confused me. Then I found this video and an epiphany happened.
onimusha542 6 months ago
You are brilliant, man! You remind me of the great Herbert Gross from MIT (1968-1973).
ThisReallySuckz 6 months ago
thnaks
selimm11 7 months ago
patrick, you should put a flattr and donation button on your website :)
SalamiWurscht 7 months ago
correct me if im wrong, im quite new to this topic...so im guessing the 3 variable one would be using the same procedure? so instead of having F(x,y,lamda) like in this case, u'd have F(x,y,z,lamda)?
vonlsh 7 months ago
''lameda''
tthanh92 7 months ago
I have a Calc final tonight, and I'm learning off all your videos. My college professor is absolutely TERRIBLE so I'm learning off your videos. HA YAH! THANKS!
owninit1 7 months ago
you just saved my ass. i have a test tomorrow and i had no idea how to do this :)
someoneusedmyuser 7 months ago
impossible to understand with my college book , but hopefully you made a video about it !!! :)
scepticpatriot 7 months ago 2
You are THE MAN!!! ive been struggling to do la grange for like 2 months now and its nearly exams. i thought i was screwed! watching this 10 min video i could answer all the questions easily!! Thank you very much <<from Mechanical Engineering student from New Zealand.
MechEngineer111 7 months ago
Wow, that was easy to understand. Thanks for the video, greetings from germany!
schwarzegarde 7 months ago
You're the Chuck Norris of Math.
Mayitzin 8 months ago
You and Sal are both good men. My lecturer is just damn lousy compares to you.
The lecturers in uni don't know how to teach. Very sad. They are too relax in their office thinking of tricking students without proper explanation. This is the man. Rock.
kkc1648 8 months ago
Thanx for your help ! But i want to ask if u can make a video on how to solve functions with (x,y,z) ?
owenzarido 8 months ago
Thanx for your help ! But i want to ask if u can make a video on how to solve functions with (x,y,z) ?
owenzarido 8 months ago
please answer this cause alot of people have been asking it, what do u do differently if you want to maximize your function?
ahmadhuneidi 8 months ago
seriously, they should put your face on money you're so good!
Channel4Four 8 months ago
nice job my friend
colexionztelar 8 months ago
You've taught me more in this 10 minute video than I've learned in the last two weeks of calc. Thank you, bro. You're a lifesaver.
treylitefm 8 months ago 2
great video! the left handed writing was a bit unnerving though :)
kkal0 8 months ago
Great video! The left hand was a bit unnerving but you explained it really well.
kkal0 8 months ago
i've studied this topic years back but due to negligence, i've lost it.. i found it back today clearer than ever.. thanks..
sidiqmk 8 months ago
Patrick, why are you subtracting the lambda part of the equation instead of adding? In the end it doesn't matter whether you add or subtract it because it equals 0, but is there something I'm missing?
BeBattey 8 months ago
yeah but that is just an application and makes use of less than basic calculus. I was wandering how do you derive this result...
h0wud0in2 8 months ago
Thank you for all your help. Every time I watch one of your videos I click on the google ad. This is my way of donating to you :)
bachstrad644 9 months ago
Can only echo the comments of many other users. Excellent explanations, very helpful for me (Economics student)
ZodarH 9 months ago
You taught me more in ten minutes than my college Calc prof has taught me all semester. Muchos gracias.
selbs91 9 months ago
thanks man
stivio00 9 months ago
patrick, are you a mormon?
jophis66 9 months ago
Thankyou thankyou thankyou! Your method is infinitely easier than the method I have found in any text books
simianmirror 9 months ago
Thankyou thankyou thankyou! Your method is infinitely easier than the method I have found in any text books
simianmirror 9 months ago
Fuck these Mormon ads
alborzgod 9 months ago
I´m Mexican, but I have a question for you...
How you record your videos? for example, where you put your camera for not move?
UnFisicoMatematico 9 months ago
THANKS A LOT ...
success2508 9 months ago
Thankyou soo much. The textbooks are not nearly as helpful as you are. Great job!!!
SLNProductions 9 months ago
seriously, im a german economics-student and learn this from an american guy! :D i like the way you explain things. its very useful! best regards from germany.
Ugapop 9 months ago 7
@Ugapop see how nice usa people are
patrickJMT 9 months ago 14
dear mr. lagrange, I HATE YOU AND YOUR MULTIPLIERS and i wish to constrain you
on the other hand, mr. JMT, i love you. you have saved my life 5! times and you will exponentially continue to help me throughout my life.
omgwtfmk 9 months ago
Awesome video my man. helped a lot
Adammysorewala 10 months ago
you and salman khan should join forces and take over the maths tuition universe
Androopy1 10 months ago
You are a life savior. Thank you so much.
batuhany 10 months ago
Thank you so much for this , I really understand this stuff now
yarie18 10 months ago
I wanted to ask the same thing. Why is the formula not + Lambda ?
erenaksu1234 10 months ago
why is it minus lambda and not plus?
Tbarber2112 10 months ago
I got 3 words for you: I LOVE YOU!!!!
rerikm 10 months ago 14
@rerikm : )
patrickJMT 10 months ago
Wow!! you are amazing! tomorrow is our final exam in math and I dont really understand a thing.. but thanks to you.. Everything is clear now. Thank you so much..
MrKyte12 10 months ago
Actually filling in the equations isn't too hard... the proof seems rather complicated though
bla7091 10 months ago
thank you very much, greetings from Turkey . .
interpolitic 10 months ago
One of the only tutors on youtube that can give khanacademy a run for it's money.
WalkerDestroyer 10 months ago
Dude thanks! Keep it up
Agentasian77 11 months ago
PatrickJMT, you are the savior of many a calculus student. You are a superior teacher to tons of professors including top tier schools. Please take these comments as motivation to keep providing quality instruction to the masses.
seriously, these are great.
naras987 11 months ago 48
@naras987 thanks : ) I will keep making vids !
patrickJMT 11 months ago 11
@naras987 Honestly, I completely agree. I go to class, write down the title of the lecture, then come and search these videos and the ones on Khan Academy and learn from those!
matics19 10 months ago
that's a very nice video indeed. I did not even require to wear my headphone. Thank you.
isla2974 11 months ago
use the lagrange's multiplier to calculate the minimum and maximum volume of a woman's breast F(x,y,z)=2X+y^4-5z under the constraints between D cup and DD. (5marks)
hendsem 11 months ago 3
THANX!!! :D In 10 min you explained what took my professor a whole lecture ,and i still didnt get it.
katinkaschyberg 11 months ago
Just wanted to say thank you for posting these. My prof. teaches from the book and the book is very confusing. Your videos helped me pass calc 2 and have already helped me immensely with calc 3.
meteorologyswimgirl 11 months ago
thank you soooo much, you saved me!!
carmensq9591 11 months ago
Thanks a lot. I pray for your success in future.You saved me a lot.Thanks for the easiest explanation on earth.Thanks.Thanks.Thanks
luqukoman90 1 year ago
thanks a lot for these videos, in this one can we compute this equation to get maximums or minimums ? or we can only define it by doing that final test?
sorry for my english
fvboss429 1 year ago
u learn me goods
patchesohola 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There is Trying to be naughty brides "benaughtyman.info"
madaraddeumiployolbc 1 year ago
thank you for teaching me lagrange, must easier to learn when you can play and pause and hear what your saying.. unlike my prof.
beethz 1 year ago
Thanks so much pal! reduced my stressing to a minimum for my final!!
MomImHungry 1 year ago
You probably just made me pass calculus, thank you sir!
kareneley 1 year ago
dude i just went on your site .. u have.. everything....:O
GooseyFruit 1 year ago
your a very good teacher man, straight to the point and with no accent, gotta love it! keep up the good work, highly appreciated(y)
GooseyFruit 1 year ago
Thanks a lot! I've been having a lot of trouble with understanding this. You're really helpful!
carlo8921 1 year ago
Yo man! i cant seem to find the vid on how to deal with 3 variables??
MrMikevandyke 1 year ago
Yo man! you say at the end u r going to upload a vid on how to deal with 3 variables? I cant find it! is it up?
MrMikevandyke 1 year ago
thanks! I have an exam in an hour, and I had to idea about this subject..now I am good at it! thanks to your help!!
AlBaShA13 1 year ago
u're awesome.. it really helped me... thanks and keep up the good work ; )
RebSMP 1 year ago
Thank you Patrick!
88Anit 1 year ago
I'm really confused as to when you would subtract or add lambda... this video shows to subtract lambda when we want to maximize--what's the case when we would ADD lambda to f(x, y)?
xryuuseix 1 year ago
best teacher in the whole of youtube!!! keep doing ur thing!!
Theravhard 1 year ago
just wanted to say man, i've been watching your videos ever since calc I and have never watched one of your videos and felt like i still didn't understand something. im almost done with my minor in mathematics and to be honest, i think i would've quit trying to be an engineer a long time ago if it wasn't for you. keep it up!
yumyum210 1 year ago
awesome!
sasamuraki 1 year ago
After watching about 5 of your videos, I realize you're left handed. =D
Anyway, you taught LaGrange Multipliers better than my book ever could. Thanks very much!
duhduhduhduhduh 1 year ago
could you explain why you set Fx, Fy, and more importantly Flam to zero? thanks
JohnAntonyFortune 1 year ago
Great Stuff! Maybe you can get your camera to face the paper from a better angle or even get a digital pen and notepad! Keep up the good work!
mluetten 1 year ago
Thank you so much for posting these videos! None of my maths professors or their aids could explain as well as your simple and concise videos do! =)
fabooster 1 year ago
Great Example
masterjim2007 1 year ago
I would be sooooo screwed without you!
greyfoxxelite 1 year ago
this is awesome. i go to MIT and this video makes more sense than the professor's lecture. Thanks a ton!
jaredtkatz 1 year ago
What if your constraint is a less than or equal to or a greater than or equal too? can you still use this method?
scdlbrdr 1 year ago
excellent video, as usual Patrick!
Julman75 1 year ago
WOA! thanks for the teaching!
Great, good, nice, excelent teaching... good teaching... yeap.
gregorioster 1 year ago
Thank you...I needed a refresher on Lagrange multipliers and your video was great!
idolgin776 1 year ago 2
The love for math is returning to me)) Thanks!
Pocky99Eater 1 year ago 2
Thank you, you helped a lot to understand the concept using this nice example.
mvaredi 1 year ago
superb , you saved my time
deen2dam 1 year ago
Comment removed
paidinfull87 1 year ago
beautiful....thanks
xhinandoa 1 year ago
the teaching is really good, very easy to understand.but if u could give the geometrical explaination also it wld have been good.
vsahanarao 1 year ago 7
@vsahanarao well, cant do it all in a short video
patrickJMT 1 year ago 3
god bless you man :'(
whysocurious92 1 year ago
nice vid bro ;)
lifetech2 1 year ago 3
@lifetech2 thanks!
patrickJMT 1 year ago
dude .... yo the man .... bro..... just did a crazy exponential function saddle point question using one of yo videos as a guide ...... thanks !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
amrichbiatch 1 year ago
to verify if the critical points i've obtained through this method i've always used the second derivative criteria, or the hessian criteria. And it's not so dificult at all.
sssssantiagooooo 1 year ago
i understand this now! thank you SO much!!!
ohgeeitsph4rrah 1 year ago
that was great. good teaching
stangman767 1 year ago
@stangman767 thank ya
patrickJMT 1 year ago
I love you. You are superior to my actual professor.
DJGrayMusic 1 year ago
thanx hey i totally get it now.
popoable1 1 year ago
You have made a mistake in your procedure,although the solution is correct..
badboy4life414 1 year ago
thank you so much, you have really helped me so many times
Revanv 1 year ago
Thank You Patrick!! Awesome Video!!
MrDrinkBeer 1 year ago
Wow. I wish I would have found you earlier! My Calc final is tomorrow and I've literally just been going through all your videos. This seriously is amazing. It makes a huge difference when you can try a problem and then watch someone do it step by step. Thanks so much!
redechoes 1 year ago
What if i wanted the max ?
arixue 1 year ago
There is a flaw in the proof in 1:43-1:46 and 7:52-8:48. In principle, the stationary point (x,y)=(60,30), i.e, where the gradient vanishes, could have been a saddle point, and therefore neither a maximum nor a minimum. To finish the proof, one would therefore have to check the boundary cases (x,y)=(90,0) and (x,y)=(0,90) as well.
drrhobert 1 year ago
thanks patrick, i watched this video about a month before i learned it in Calc 3! it really helped. Your the man.
and by the way, does JMT stand for the group Jedi Mind Tricks?
krillansavillan 1 year ago 2
@krillansavillan no : ) it stands for my tutoring business name 'Just Math Tutoring' which i may soon retire from
patrickJMT 1 year ago
@patrickJMT why's that pat?
krillansavillan 1 year ago
@krillansavillan hahaha i thought the same thing! jedi mind!
BPColin 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You have made a mistake in your procedure,although the solution is correct..
badboy4life414 1 year ago
this video was very helpful. you sir are the reason im doing good in my cal 3 class. i really appreciate you taking the time and effort to post all these videos and sharing your knowledge with the rest of us. for some reason the way you break all this down makes me understand the subject matter so much better.
this1ssteve 1 year ago