World Trade Center "IMPLOSION"

[nctrooper10722001]

Yup. Thats a Text-Book IMP .. Done that 12 yrs working EOD and other stuff.. PPL are stupid

[foredeck100]

I think the collapse of tower seven brings the whole explanation provided by our government into question. That building looks like it was demolished from within. This is what the video evidence favors. Tower seven should not have collapsed. And the evidence is true then somebody is lying about something. I detest conspiracy theories but I'd have to say that something is very fishy with tower seven.

[GBEVAN71gmailcom]

things do explode when an 100 storey building falls on them

[SuperTreyone]

An Anarchy should rise and crush the american governement,

American government is full of shit - fuck you

[LuyzSanshes1]

If explosives were detonated, I mean, if you detonate a bomb in the middle of the building why did the building collapses from the up side from detonators?... It's like yeah, I'm detonating a bomb from the very bottom of the building but it's collapsing from the top? =/

[johshphrd]

Any one that thinks a buildings this big can fall so neatly & tidally in to it's own basement by chance are so asleep in there thinking, there in a coma...

pull your heads out of the sand & see the truth!

[lindenmeyer11]

I have the right answer for this!! It's called AIR PRESSURE!! As the top floors were going down, the air pressure went up, to the point of exploding windows!! Several witnesses reported a HUGE air passage passing through them inside the building!!

Shame on you guys!!

[Born2Flesh]

Dance like an Israeli...

[Neyowolf]

Great song, what track is this?

[Xxx3vi13vixxX]

@Neyowolf real hip hop by KRS One

[pannono]

Have you seen a real controlled demolition? The amount of explosives required to take down a building of that size would cause more than a "puff" of smoke.

[jamonic1]

@pannono That's right... and I remember that we found weapons of mass destruction, too.

[Xxx3vi13vixxX]

@jamonic1 I could care less if the government was involved or not, I dont trust big brother either way! But this honestly shows/proves nothing out of the ordinary.

[galaxything]

@pannono you clearly havent looked very hard have you, check david charndlers close up videos you see thousand of demo charges until they become hidden by the falling debre check video named "WTC NORTH TOWER EXPLODING, David Chandler, AE911truth.o r g"

[opium340]

whats the song?

[ImWinningDuh]

disrespect to the people that died that day go off yourself 

[ImWinningDuh]

truthers are so gay

[ReiGrim]

Cool Implosion!

[lubanater]

I don't want to believe this was an inside job, but the more I investigate it, I appears to be. Consider this, World trade center 7 was a "picture prefect" implosion and "NO" parts of the planes or debris actually hit WTC 7 but it imploded and fell...

[phlyegles43]

@lubanater Tower One hit World Trade Center Seven. I suggest you look at how damaged the south face of WTC7 was. Also the fact that its engineering made it very susceptible to collapse. Considering the fact it was build over a substation which made the construction of the building very dificult and the collapse much easier.

[15PhenomenoN]

Watch "blueprint for truth part 9 of 13" @ about 3:10 its TOO obvious

[likpit]

In the soloman building there was explosions before the world trade centers collapsed search for that video.

[KLUNKET]

Also, remember 1993? There was a truck bomb snuck into the WTC with IMMENSE explosive power equal to more than 150,000 PSI. This bomb compromised 4 levels of the foundation of the WTC. It didn't even phase the integrity of the building. Also, what you call your evidence of explosions are NOTHING but windows blowing out and smoke escaping. In 93, the smoke travellled all the way to the 93 floor, is it really that hard to imagine that a jet hitting the building would cause smoke on lower levels?

[KLUNKET]

I find it hillarious that people still think that this building was imploded. To create an implosion that would cripple a building of such massive size and integrity would have taken months to prepare. You conspiracy theorists make up your own facts without taking reality into consideration. The world trade center was one of the most busy locations in the USA, DO YOU REALLY THINK NOBODY WOULD HAVE NOTICED PEOPLE SETTING CHARGES ALL OVER THE BUILDING FOR MONTHS AHEAD OF TIME?

[StoopidTwoofer]

@KLUNKET drill 1 1/8 diameter hole 2 feet deep, put 22 inch long by 1 inch diameter explosive charge in, with wireless detonation, put plug over hole? detonate whenever you want? You could easily start detonating at any floor?

[KLUNKET]

@StoopidTwoofer- I think I hear the Looney Tunes theme playing in the backround! The WTC was designed to withstand ALMOST anything.It had already withstood a bomb WEIGHING OVER 1500 LB in 1993.The large bomb made a mess of the building,but did not compromise the structural integrity at all.You would need hundreds of little 2 feet deep hole with 1"explosive charges strategically placed all over the building.It would take months to plan and implement.You dont think anyone would have noticed?

[StoopidTwoofer]

@KLUNKET You said how? I explained a possible way? Would someone notice? Not if no one else is there? Yes I suspect it would take some time? Possible? More possible than hijacking the four lowest passenger capacitated air liners on the same day?

[KLUNKET]

StoopidTwoofer-My God,the Music is getting LOUDER.I never asked how-Lets go over your statements here-"NOBODY WOULD NOTICE IF NOBODY WAS THERE" hmm WTF?IT WAS THE WORLD FUCKING TRADE CENTER!There was NEVER a time when they were empty.At night there were workers,security staff& cleaning crews,THOUSANDS of people.During the day up to 50,000 people entered DAILY.The PLANES were the MOST possible..there was shit security prior to 9-11,they bought tickets boarded, and hijacked.They planned for months

[StoopidTwoofer]

@KLUNKET security staff was there? your own words? conspiracy plot they might be involved? some claims are that there was a shutdown just before the attack? is it true? Also there are claims of relatives to the former president in high places of the security? is that true? if so they have time and opportunity? possible? You believe jackers got on Planes, and the ones they got, happened to have the least passengers? Shuffle a deck of cards, spread them face down, and pick the four 2's

[KLUNKET]

@StoopidTwoofer -LOL.By your own logic, that is EXACTLY what YOUR trying to do, pick four 2's from the deck.The amount of passengers on board the plane has nothing to do with this,those animals could care less about killing people-OBVIOUSLY.The hijackers DID get the planes,it was witnessed by THOUSANDS. Your forgetting that the chief of security saved lives that day,but he perished.If they knew about it,why would they stay behind and die?Many security and port authority staff died that day.

[KLUNKET]

@StoopidTwoofer -furthermore there was no shutdown. The WTC wasn't a fucking 7-11. It was the LARGEST financial institution ON THE PLANET. If it shuts down for even an HOUR that is HEADLINE news. You conspiracy theorists are simply sickening. You need things to be true, so you invent "facts". You ignore reality in order to further your beleifs. Then you follow evidence that is fabricated and does not exist. You need something to be true, so its TRUE. The real world does not work that way.

[StoopidTwoofer]

@KLUNKET Scott Forbes still says there was shutdown on south building? It is 10 min job to drill hole and cover? Did any of securacoms security force die? Someone in charge did not believe an airliner crashing into the building would be dangerous for the other building, and told them to go back to work? Someone thought there was no chance it was going to fall? believing lies is common! How about this one "We had no idea they would use airplanes to attack us"

[KLUNKET]

@StoopidTwoofer - It is NOT a 10 minute job to drill a hole and cover. As we have already discussed it would have taken hundreds of charges all over the building, and months of drilling. Your an idiot. You want what you believe to be true so badly that you are willing to overlook all of the ACTUAL facts, and spill out this line of bullshit a mile long. I am through discussing this with you because it has become obvious that I am waisting my time... Go be crazy somewhere else.

[StoopidTwoofer]

@KLUNKET As you wish

[Emsworker68]

@KLUNKET There were rolling shut downs of floors prior to 911. A great many of the floors were empty thus the ecomonic hardship to the owners of WTC.

In the months leading up to 911 there was on overhaul of the fire proofing of the steel beams as there ws complaints that it was falling off. Keeping this in mind, have you ever heard of energetic nanocomposites? Ever heard of Sol-gel?

David Griffin in one of his books says :

[Emsworker68]

@Emsworker68 says: "spray on nano thermite materials may have been applied to the steel components of the WTC buildings, underneath the upgraded fireproofing."

One survivor of that day says in the days prior to 911 on the empty and unoccupied floor above him he could hear banging and constrution noises. Each morning they would come into work to find fine dust on everything. One day he went and peeking in. It was by than completely empty. Nothing was in there.

Are you seeing a pattern?

[KLUNKET]

@Emsworker68 - I have heard of these things- and have considered the possibility- I have done more study into this matter than the people who make these conspiracy videos. If you would really like to debate me on this- send me a private message on youtube and let me know exactly what your take is on the events of that day. I'd be happy to debate- just as long as its friendly debate

[kiaganga]

the perfect jewish pull !!ready for bush ta fook ya ass!!!

[cjellwood]

lots of talk but at the end of the day posting videos and whining does not produce results. It is because you are all pussies that this happened in the first place be it by terrorist or government hand.  Now get back to work and stop wasting time watching videos!

[junglemike72]

@junglemike72 This was actually for Nimrod rugbynimbus. Go watch Rugby cause we all know you do not research anything but rugby. 

[Coventry27]

People... I IMPLORE you to PLEASE OPEN YOUR EYES. Do NOT take things at face value. Research! Here're some hints: RFID chip; The Bilderburgs; The Rockefellers & Rothchilds; The Illuminati; New World Order; North American Union; The "Amero," False Flags; David Ray Griffin: Let's Get Empirical video; infowars.com; Physics 101 - Gravity; free-fall; temperature at which steel melts; Revelations 13: 14-17!  Wake up, people! It's unpatriotic NOT to question and seek the truth from our government.

[zoobiessuck]

I don't understand what these are trying to prove. Those little explosions didn't bring down the WTCs, the planes did. All this proves is that there were unexplained explosions a ways down the building. They could have been natural gas tanks.

[Coventry27]

@zoobiessuck Yeah, and the Easter Bunny, the Tooth Fairy, and Santa Clause are all alive and well! What it's trying to prove to imbaciles like you and your rose-colored glasses is that 75% of this BS isn't physically possible. If deductive reasoning isn't part of your DNA, then maybe you can READ and RESEARCH how the laws of nature and of GOD leave better explanations that those of our "cover up" government who are for big corporations and NOT its citizens. WAKE UP, sheeple!

[marcus7626]

you do know the buildings collapsed from the inside,

[markushes]

How much force does each of these explosions carry to be able to bring down the building and using which explosive material?

[rugbynimbus]

So what we have is a minute-long exploration of what happens to the air in an HVAC system when it's compressed by floors pancaking down. It moves out faster than the material falling outward in an open space.

So as the upper floors collapse, it forces air down through the ductwork under massive pressure and it blows out at various points below the point of imminent collapse. *shrug* Alright.

Aw shit ... I'm sorry, man. I accidentally stepped on your compelling evidence. Will it be okay?

[jamonic1]

Sorry, you sound intelligent only to yourself, why don't you perform a demonstration -in the building.

[rugbynimbus]

No need. Even you could put a realistic demonstration together.

Stack pieces of plywood, maybe 10-12, separated at the edges by a single row of bricks. Under the top layer, or "floor," place a plastic storage bag that you've inflated and put in a dash of baby powder. Now put a length of hose into the bag and tape it shut. Run the hose thru a hole in the middle of the boards.

Now jump onto the stack. What do the think the odds are the powder will shoot out the hose before you hit bottom?

[rugbynimbus]

Forced air also explains the reason why the "puffs" continue unabated while the higher floors collapse, pushing air down. This is clearly evident at 1:00.

If these were demo-charges, we would see a single, short burst, not a steady stream.

And if anyone studied the structure -- like Bin Laden did -- they'd know you'd only need demo charges at the top floors to start the chain-reaction. Lower-floor charges are superfluous at that point.

Sorry, but demolition isn't adding up on this one.

[NVanWendy]

@jamonic1 Actually, that was very intelligent. Sorry to be so late in backing him up, but yeah, rugbynumbus is right on the money. Are you in the HVAC trade to say differently? Your so-called "evidence" of blasting is nothing of the kind.

[Xxx3vi13vixxX]

@jamonic1 do u really believe this, or do you do it to get hits/views? you realize you are highlighting clouds of smoke/debris bursting out of a building that has enormous amounts of pressure collapsing down on it, and not explosions, right?! no matter what the actual cause of the collapse, be it demolition or the planes, the images you are highlighting would be something you would expect to see in a building that size collapsing on itself.

[junglemike72]

@rugbynimbus Pancake theory has already been debunked so come up with another fairy tale. Better wake up Alice. Pancake, usually I do not respond to these brain dead idiots, but what the hell. Let this sheep keep his fairytale and go about you business. There is no evidence are fact that these brainwashed fools will except, they only except the coincidental and inconclusive theories. They believe in planes disintegrating into a thousand pieces with no evidence of a airliner crashing.

[junglemike72]

And they believe that passports and other Identification could survive the inferno but body's and Black Boxes no. And the total collapse on all the building goes against Physics, so if you are majoring in physics you better stop cause it is flawed. These is what we argue against, mind numbing intelligence. If you what me to come back with all the facts from that day, open your mouth to me, and tell me another moronic excuse. American is dumbed down and this guy is the perfect example.

[junglemike72]

And they believe that passports and other Identification could survive the inferno but body's and Black Boxes no. And the total collapse on all the building goes against Physics, so if you are majoring in Physics you better stop cause it is flawed. These is what we ague against, mind numbing intelligence. If you want me to come back with all the facts from that day, open your mouth to me, and tell me another moronic excuse. American is dumbed down and this guy is the perfect example.

[rugbynimbus]

@junglemike72 - Imagine for a moment how much more compelling these arguments could be if you spent as much time presenting evidence as you did crafting personal attacks that are, at best, flaccid.

Look, it was a terrible, traumatic, tragic day. But fabricating intricate, fanciful explanations for the obvious isn't helping anything or anyone.

At this point, I'd be pleased just to entertain ideas from someone who can articulate a coherent thought free from poor grammar and lazy spelling.

[Emsworker68]

@rugbynimbus If what you say is true, why were some of the ejections 30 or so floors below the level of collapse?

[rugbynimbus]

@Emsworker68 - That's a lot of floors of ventilation ducts compressing air, each floor adding its own air to that of those above it and pushing it on down to the next floor and next floor and so on, quickly pushing down past floors that hadn't compacted yet. I wouldn't be surprised if it was exponential progression. At any rate, the fact that these "explosions" correspond to floors with HVAC equipment is fairly compelling for me.

[Gamethroughs]

@rugbynimbus The biggest lie i've ever read.

[rugbynimbus]

@Gamethroughs - No, "Sarah Palin is a bright, articulate woman worthy of acclaim" would be the biggest lie you've ever read. But let's get back to me...

If what I described was a lie, then explain the miracle that is an accordion. Same principle here. You squeeze a container, air finds a way out. And even if you only squeeze on one side, air pushes out ahead of the place you're squeezing.

If that's a lie and air doesn't behave that way, there are much larger, fundamental issues to address.

[15PhenomenoN]

@rugbynimbus Why the hell's this guy's getting thumbs up?? You're feeble attempt at intelligence is absolutely hilarious. Why would a plume of compressed air be composed of so much debri??? That "air" is as dark as dirt, that's not compressed air honey that's debri. No gust of air is going to obliterate things to dust. This is a squid, a result of an explosion. Period. Thanks for trying tho, it's cute

[rugbynimbus]

@15PhenomenoN - Ah yes, vitriol -- the last resort of the desperate. I really enjoy reading responses like this, imagining just how shrill their voices would be. Now THAT'S cute.

So what is air anyway? Particles? Hmm...

BTW, if, once started, the pancaking of floors is self-perpetuating, which clearly it is, why detonate add'l charges and needlessly risk exposing this conspiracy of thousands?

Still no one can explain why the simplest explanation isn't the "right" one.

[MrDeamon1]

@rugbynimbus thats exactly what i thought, without sound. Computer was on mute.

[MeFingerHott]

@peskeyplumber I agree with you. I believe that there's evidence that support each side of the argument. But I definitely agree with you.

[jacho80]

Fucking US government how could they blow up a building with more than 2000 ppl inside??

That's what they did to american citizens just imagine what they've being doing in another countries throw this whole century, damn rockefellers you'll pay for this, and all the bilderberg group will.

Demons must be destroyed !!!

[peskeyplumber]

Well there's probably things in the towers that can explode when set on fire, so if there's flames in the building, they're gonna explode, so I'm gonna go with my explination.

[jamonic1]

Your "explination" is probably as accurate as your spelling. (Explanation).

[peskeyplumber]

Tell me one thing that's wrong with my explanation. There's only one spelling mistake, Mr. English Teacher.

[Coventry27]

@peskeyplumber It's not just your misspelled word and consistent misuse of contractions... it's also that what Jamonic1 was intimating was how his/her rebuttal went entirely over your head. A wise person once said: "Tis better to keep your mouth shut and appear a fool, than to open it and remove all doubt." Your "explination" was baseless, and you really need to do some reading AND research! With all due respect, I rest my case.

[phlyegles43]

@jamonic1 are you debating grammar because you cant debate your own points?

[gofojibwas]

Yeah bud, im sure that the combustible things on the various floors of the tower only exploded from the moment the implosion started until the building was rubble, a nine-second span. Do you seriously believe that everything exploded only in those nine seconds, and NOT ANYTIME before it??

[Diogojfcosta]

@peskeyplumber agree with you... tired of conspiracies....

[MrDruggs]

Great evidence, man. Five stars.