Хуйня все это.Достаточно несколько раз выстрелить по такой системе из "Шмель-М" у которого выстреливает капсулу на дальность до 1700 метров в взрыв такой капсулы равен взрыву 152мм осколочно-фугасного снаряда,то есть проще говоря эту систему защиты снесет нахуй ударной волной.
How do you jam a wire-guided weapon like the TOW or MILAN anyway?
Oh, and sign me out of walking next to any piece of armour equipped with this. The kind of pressure wave that'll knock a hypersonic KE penetrator off course is unlikely to be survivable.
1. I would bet it could only stop "slow" moving projectiles. Ergo no defense against anti tank high speed arrow ammunition.
2. It uses HE to deflect a incoming round. Ergo, infantry outside would have a bad day. Infantry that otherwise would probably survive if the shape charge hit the tank, ironically. At the cost of the crew of course if it penetrated.
3. Tanks should never go into urban areas without infantry support. Ergo, close support = system off.
hmm, I think he didn't actually shoot at the APC. Because all we can see in the video are close-ups. I gues it's not battleready yet. You can't see the APC even at the take from the Moderators back(6:23). Even the worst cameraman in the world would not miss the chance to film a scene with shooter and target in the picture.
Curious...It looks like a one shot defense. It can stop one RPG, but if attacked again will Iron Fist have another projectile to throw or is it empty?
There doesn't seem to be any information i can find about it... my guess is that they would have reloading mechanisms and yes they would have limited ammo but that is still better that slats of armor that would be heavy and they can only take so much of a beating.
I still dont understand how can they take out kinetic shells like sabots, I mean they have enough kinetic energy still after explosion to impact... but what ever, its Israel! Yay! They can do anything!
It sounds like its going to expose besides the projectile no matter what it is. This will create a force that will disrupt the path of the projectile so that it will miss the target. This idea is a replacement of the jammer. And it should work with kinetic shells. You can imagine that the shell originally flying in a straight line toward the vehicle will now fly pass the vehicle or hit the ground before reaching it.
Nothke, remember, a kinetic kill weapon is linear in its effect, it must be driven straight through the armor for it to be effective. Tip the penetrator and you degrade the depth of penetration the pentrator is capable of. If a penetrator does not intersect the armor along the longitudinal axis of its flight path it will shatter against the armor,either way the effect is the same, no vehicle penetration.
it's a big charge of explosive, it doesn't stop it, just destabilizes it so it either misses completely or impacts flat(not with the tip), but it's still better then nothing...
IDF is about to equip the Merkava 3 & 4 with the trophy, and to equip the armored personnel carrier "namer" (very similar to the merkava) with a modded iron fist system.
iron fist will be on the israeli armored carrier 'namer", and the trophy will be on the merkava III & IV. iron fist made by IMI and trophy made by refa'el (both israeli). but i dont know about system differences - im sure there is a reason one of them will be on a tank and the other on armored carrier.
I think that the USA has similar system on their tanks. Russia has a system like this on the T-90s. I personally don't think that the US would let Russia have the advantage in this area of active protection!
I think that the USA has similar system on their tanks. Russia has a system like this on the T-90s. I personally don't think that the US would let Russia have the advantage in this area of active protection!
I think that the USA has similar system on their tanks. Russia has a system like this on the T-90s. I personally don't think that the US would let Russia have the advantage in this area of active protection!
@zaco21 The Russian system never went into service and the American system is years away from service,last year the Pentagon chose Iron fist and Trophy light to protect it's tanks.
@Jfoo111 You think so. The army of God(mujahideen)(muslims) will never be lose. Even if you use the LATEST technology. We are not scared of death. Jewish scums are. WIN
So how long would it take for such a thing to reload, and would it be able to take a misile from each side, or will it just stall when it disarms one?
i agree with symon747, in iraq, tanks were attacked over and over again... but i guess iron fist would be a good example for future tank defense systems.
how about a javelin or an air to ground missile ?
ituengineer90 4 months ago
I <3 Israel
tunisiangeek 5 months ago
Хуйня все это.Достаточно несколько раз выстрелить по такой системе из "Шмель-М" у которого выстреливает капсулу на дальность до 1700 метров в взрыв такой капсулы равен взрыву 152мм осколочно-фугасного снаряда,то есть проще говоря эту систему защиты снесет нахуй ударной волной.
sla165 7 months ago
Jfoo, soviets created similar system about 30 years ago, so much to your comment.
Ackreti 7 months ago
All becomes a metal scrap when a EMP is detonated. But think about it, Isn't it worth it?
xm16vulcan 7 months ago
How do you jam a wire-guided weapon like the TOW or MILAN anyway?
Oh, and sign me out of walking next to any piece of armour equipped with this. The kind of pressure wave that'll knock a hypersonic KE penetrator off course is unlikely to be survivable.
CoriolanusAtrox 1 year ago
so if all tanks have this its just a matter of who runs out of hard approach..
bayarm9 1 year ago
This system is a double edged sword.
1. I would bet it could only stop "slow" moving projectiles. Ergo no defense against anti tank high speed arrow ammunition.
2. It uses HE to deflect a incoming round. Ergo, infantry outside would have a bad day. Infantry that otherwise would probably survive if the shape charge hit the tank, ironically. At the cost of the crew of course if it penetrated.
3. Tanks should never go into urban areas without infantry support. Ergo, close support = system off.
Lobos222 1 year ago
hmm, I think he didn't actually shoot at the APC. Because all we can see in the video are close-ups. I gues it's not battleready yet. You can't see the APC even at the take from the Moderators back(6:23). Even the worst cameraman in the world would not miss the chance to film a scene with shooter and target in the picture.
Doan84 1 year ago
Shortcomings of the system
1-Is not effective against more than a shell at the same time
2-Lead to the bombing of missiles kill infantry soldiers near the armored vehicles
3-Exploding shells near the lead to Corruption of the system
4-Ineffective against antitank missiles, and third-generation speed ultrasonic
5-Expensive U.S.A Refused to be mounted on armor
Ukraine is working on a system that works to divert anti-tank missiles would be much better than this system
mmelkolfat2090 1 year ago
wt if u attack it from 3 points at once??? hypethetically speaking.
7homasPiazza1994 1 year ago
they are fighting fire with fire good job
slyrader1 1 year ago
When was this episode of Future weapons filmed?
zaco21 1 year ago
scy fi movie
apelsinas69 2 years ago
doesn't look very safe for nearby infantry
Takeital 2 years ago
Curious...It looks like a one shot defense. It can stop one RPG, but if attacked again will Iron Fist have another projectile to throw or is it empty?
spinfrak 2 years ago
There doesn't seem to be any information i can find about it... my guess is that they would have reloading mechanisms and yes they would have limited ammo but that is still better that slats of armor that would be heavy and they can only take so much of a beating.
marineninga 1 year ago
he said multiple attacks. it wouldn't be much of anything if it couldn't
aus2503 1 year ago
@spinfrak
its empty. you can install several of them, or reload them. if it adds 1 extra life to the tank, which it effectively does, thats already quite good.
kurtilein3 1 year ago
@spinfrak it has 2 shots available before needing a reload.... not enough if you ask me
look at systems like AMAP ADS which have a lot more charges before needing a reload (while having shorter reaction times too)
a system using a turret to shoot at incoming threats may look cool but it's very impractical imo
and relying on an impractical system can get you killed fast...
Keh0ol 1 year ago
I still dont understand how can they take out kinetic shells like sabots, I mean they have enough kinetic energy still after explosion to impact... but what ever, its Israel! Yay! They can do anything!
nothke 2 years ago 4
It sounds like its going to expose besides the projectile no matter what it is. This will create a force that will disrupt the path of the projectile so that it will miss the target. This idea is a replacement of the jammer. And it should work with kinetic shells. You can imagine that the shell originally flying in a straight line toward the vehicle will now fly pass the vehicle or hit the ground before reaching it.
shadownlight 2 years ago
Nothke, remember, a kinetic kill weapon is linear in its effect, it must be driven straight through the armor for it to be effective. Tip the penetrator and you degrade the depth of penetration the pentrator is capable of. If a penetrator does not intersect the armor along the longitudinal axis of its flight path it will shatter against the armor,either way the effect is the same, no vehicle penetration.
sakoshooter48 2 years ago
it's a big charge of explosive, it doesn't stop it, just destabilizes it so it either misses completely or impacts flat(not with the tip), but it's still better then nothing...
AKAtheA 2 years ago
@nothke if Python 5 is real.. yes they can do anything :D
davidds0 1 year ago
Oy! Five stars.
LEOPARDTWO 2 years ago 3
God! I love these people.
*****.
LEOPARDTWO 2 years ago 4
what's the differance between iron fist and trophy?
FireStorm81318 2 years ago
2 different (both israeli) companies.
IDF is about to equip the Merkava 3 & 4 with the trophy, and to equip the armored personnel carrier "namer" (very similar to the merkava) with a modded iron fist system.
kidi1232 2 years ago
iron fist = IMI
trophy = rafael
both israeli...
iron fist - will protect the NAMER armored personnel carrier.
trophy = will protect the merkava 3 & 4.
kidi1232 2 years ago
iron fist will be on the israeli armored carrier 'namer", and the trophy will be on the merkava III & IV. iron fist made by IMI and trophy made by refa'el (both israeli). but i dont know about system differences - im sure there is a reason one of them will be on a tank and the other on armored carrier.
kidi1232 2 years ago
@FireStorm81318
different developers and different system specs. they are supposed to do the same thing. pros and cons are obviously calssified.
both are amazing systems.
IDFArmor 1 year ago
wow what if they keep firing rockets?
hanwei235 3 years ago
Well the first shot usually gives away one's position.
Alcaldemb 2 years ago
How many shots you think you are going to get ???????
sakoshooter48 2 years ago
i think israel is alot smarter than usa when it comes to defence.. if the palestinian ppl wanna live, they should disband hamas already
Jfoo111 3 years ago 23
@Jfoo111
I think that the USA has similar system on their tanks. Russia has a system like this on the T-90s. I personally don't think that the US would let Russia have the advantage in this area of active protection!
zaco21 1 year ago
@Jfoo111
I think that the USA has similar system on their tanks. Russia has a system like this on the T-90s. I personally don't think that the US would let Russia have the advantage in this area of active protection!
zaco21 1 year ago
@Jfoo111
I think that the USA has similar system on their tanks. Russia has a system like this on the T-90s. I personally don't think that the US would let Russia have the advantage in this area of active protection!
zaco21 1 year ago
@zaco21 The Russian system never went into service and the American system is years away from service,last year the Pentagon chose Iron fist and Trophy light to protect it's tanks.
yairbe5 8 months ago
@Jfoo111 because there are enemies around israel's boarders
they need nice defense and USA helps much
that why
donzaliko 1 year ago
@Jfoo111 You think so. The army of God(mujahideen)(muslims) will never be lose. Even if you use the LATEST technology. We are not scared of death. Jewish scums are. WIN
gamestory13 11 months ago
very nice.
conztanntine 3 years ago 3
The next thing to invent must be an anti IED device.
sledfreaks 3 years ago 19
Well done I.M.I, technology like this will secure the main battle tank's future on the front line.
TheOneNo20 3 years ago 3
So how long would it take for such a thing to reload, and would it be able to take a misile from each side, or will it just stall when it disarms one?
ThaHyperHybrid 3 years ago
i love israel
drdlalezari 3 years ago 8
i agree with symon747, in iraq, tanks were attacked over and over again... but i guess iron fist would be a good example for future tank defense systems.
rr425x 3 years ago
What will those Israelis think of next?
cas343 3 years ago 7
very nice
partier9 3 years ago