Why is it that we have to pull a scientists teeth in order for them to answer a question?
Why couldn't he had just said, "We have never found any bones, but being that these beings live in the forested area's, The forest enviroment will rapidly destroy them."
No, instead you have to corner them into answering. Is the guy unable to step beyond step one in the conversation?
Yeah, yeah, Bigfoot shmigfoot. Hey if they are so prevalent and around all over the United states, then why I can't I recruit on of them to play football on the offensive line for the University of Texas Longhorns or maybe even the Dallas Cowboys? Just think of the possibilities, with a couple of stud bigfoots on one or both my football teams we would be unbeatable and win championships every year!
Yeah Bigfoot shmigfoot. Hey if they are so prevalent and around all over the United states, then why I can't I recruit on of them to play football on the offensive line for the University of Texas Longhorns or maybe even the Dallas Cowboys? Just think of the possibilities, with a couple of stud bigfoots on one or both my football teams we would be unbeatable and win championships every year!
@GhostDog65 Not for long, buddy. The Joke will actually be the people who laughed at witnesses, and didn't bother to look at any of the evidence.
Those people are usually so shallow, they never are capable of wrapping their minds around it, so they still poke jokes and laugh.
The debate will soon be over. But then, those who laugh were never really part of the debate. They just keep giggling and laughing. Sort of like a child who doesn't have the mental brain power to look into it themselves.
They are NOT just in the Western United States and Canada, They are all over the United states! This common misconception made me a skeptic for years. Now I know they have been reported all over the U.S. and Canada and in family groups which takes away the whole "Mythical Creature" aspect, It's not just one magical giant roaming the PNW, It's a nomadic species with a viable breeding population.
Try going into the forest and finding any animal. I've hunted miles and miles of heavily traveled game animals and NEVER found a species other than a few scattered deer bones. Even then, that's rare and usually from poachers.
Meldrum holds up what he refers to as "a good example of a typical sasquatch print". Truth is we're never shown anything close to this "print" that naturally appears in the mud. What we're shown is one or two "impressions" in the ground and some "expert" pointing out where the toes are and where the heel is because it's not clear. Show prints naturally occuring in mud/clay/dirt that a cast can be made from, with the unmistakable details like the "print" that Meldrum is holding up.
Humans are born all the time with extra digits and accidents cause humans to be with less digits than those with which they are born. It would be even stranger or more suspect if there wasn't a deviation every once in a while from the 'normal' 5 toes. Also, other animals from cows to turtles are often found with mutations such as two tails, 5 legs, etc. why not Bigfoot?
and also bird's yes bird's are key,bird's can warn animal's up to 700 yard's away that's somthing's in the wood's,and also your sent can carry into the wood's for up to a mile,bigfoot isnt stupid they need to stop making these bigfoot show's where people go into the wood's looking for them, you will never find bigfoot and there's a 99.9% chance you'll ever see one. i think 15 to 20 people a year see one and i mean canada and maybe the swamp's down in georgia,maybe washington state. that's it
what i think like gorilla's they stay in thick high grass eating all day lying down on their side. so the only way you could find them is if you where to walk up on them.
they dont walk during the day,they may stop looking for food when the sun rise's.they stay in one spot all day.
i believe there are only 2,000 to 4,000 of them and they stay in group's of 7 or more watching through thicket's for any sighn's of human's or wildlife.
(continued) video & digital cameras mean it's only a matter of time before someone is able to get good, quality imagery of one of these creatures. Of course that won't constitute "proof" from a scientific standpoint, but it will certainly cause some people to reevaluate their belief in BFs non-existence and will increase interest from the scientific community that will eventually result in physical proof.
I have never seen a bigfoot, but as someone who is an avid hunter/outdoorsman who happens to live in the Pacific Northwest I can assure you that there is a LOT of very rugged, dense, remote country the make it VERY difficult to find even common, well-known animals such as deer, elk, and bears. I think it's quite possible that an intelligent, primarily nocturnal animal with a low population density such as BF could avoid detection for a long time. But the recent advent of game cameras and small
I hear a lot of people saying that there are so many hunters and hiker out there with video cameras and have not seen anything like a Bigfoot! I don't know if I would want to post any picture or tell anybody what I saw! For one you get made a fool of and people who had no problem believing everything you said up to that point all of the sudden question you like you made it all up. I believe there are a lot of unreported sightings out there!
Some interesting POV and some very childish name calling. Truth is neither side has conclusive proof of bigfoots existence or nonexistence. Personally I think there is enough evidence to warrant serious scientific investigation. Is anything conclusive? No but there is something going on. Sightings span more than 100 years, said sightings are very consistent with the known behaviors of other great apes and significant behavior patterns unique to the Sasquatch have been noticed.
Continuing this thought. Lets look at some of the problems. Biggest question is where is the body/fossil/etc. Forests are very acidic environments remains do not last long. In fact the least represented creatures in the fossil record are woodland critters. Most of the north american fossils we have are from tarpits or deserts. Even gigantopithecus fossils are limited to only a few teeth. As for modern bodies if they are an intelligent creature than perhaps they take care of their injured or dead
The idea of Sasquatch taking care of their dead has some anicdotal evidence. There are a few (very few) reports of people killing a bigfoot. After which other bigfeet chased said person off and claimed the body. Perhaps they bury their dead. Lastly to the remoteness of the pacific northwest. While many areas are frequented by hikers and hunters (which are where a majority of the reports come from btw) there are also areas where no one has set foot in 100 years or more.
@HereBeADragon - I agree SOMETHING is going on, but the question is WHAT. To me, especially the fact that 200 years of NW hunters with rifles has produced NOT ONE BF is telling. Even hunters, concealed with the best camoflage and making the slightest movement, have frequently been shot and killed by accident. NO animal stays in thick brush all the time. And clearly, if we are to believe the reported sightings, BFs clearly are not just frequenting extremely remote areas. Continues:
@HereBeADragon, to continue, a BF from a good distance would easily be mistaken for a large bear (or vice versa). You can't tell me countless hunters would not have had opportunities to kill a BF. Certainly, thinking one was a trophy bear, hunters would quickly scope and shoot such a creature from a large distance. Here is a sincere question, I'm just curious: Do you or others think BF could be a supernatural phenomenon? Because BF defies evidential parameters common to ALL large forest animals.
I agree the BF is a difficult creature to understand. Why one hasn't been captured I cant say for sure. Its theoriezed that BFs are very intelligent, nocturnal and travel in family groups that may care for their sick and injured. These could explain why no dead are found. As for why none have been killed well we only know the haven't been found. There are reports of them being shot. Being injured but bodies not being found. If their dead are cared for than it would not be odd to not find a body
Bodies disappear quickly in an acidic environment. If bodies are buried than there would likely be nothing to find in a short time. Consider the bodies of people that go missing in the forests every year and are never found. One somewhat chilling thought as well is what happens to those hunters that go missing every year? Could some of them had sighted and shot a BF only to suffer reprisal at the hands of its kin? If this creature exists its not going to be a big teddy bear.
Yes, I realize a chimp is NOT a monkey. But the search for Bigfoot IS making a monkey out of a lot of otherwise intelligent people. The elusiveness purported to be demonstrated by Bigfoot puts it in the realm of the supernatural, as it defies all reason and logic that such a HUGE animal could remain hidden from science. If we were looking for such an animal in the Amazon, somewhere extremely dense AND remote, maybe, just maybe I could be open to the possibility. But not in the Pacific Northwest.
Do you realize how remote and dense the Pacific Northwest and western Canada is? It's over a half million square miles of sparsely-populated forest that could easily support a sustainable breeding population of 2500 Bigfoots with food, shelter, and hideouts !!
You are making yourself look quite dumb in here........I suggest you quit before it gets any uglier.
The Northwest woods have enormous vistas, expansive meadows and large, open forest understories, which make for easy targets and viewing. This is not like the Amazon, with the same density levels of low-growing plants. And these areas, although often remote, are teaming with hunters and hikers, many with video and still cameras. The burden of proof is on those championing this supposed animal's existence. So far, lots of doubts, but NO Bigfoots for proof. And truthfully, I wish I was wrong.
No, the burden of proving Bigfoot does not exist is on DUMMIES like you, moron........evidently you can prove why it was impossible for hominid descendants of Gigantopithecus in Asia to cross the temperate-forested Bering land bridge millions of yrs. ago into North America.........and then let us hear how you can explain away literally THOUSANDS of reliable eyewitness reports of a large humanoid creature roaming N. America in the past 500 years!
So I am the moron because I have reasonable doubts, supported by the VAST majority of scientists (guess they would be my fellow morons), that it is impossible for such a huge animal, in breeding numbers, to not leave ONE body, bone, fossil or clear photo, and avoid being killed by hunters or cars, dying from disease or epidemics. NO known species has EVER done this! And YOU are just pissed because YOU believe in the equivalent of the Tooth Fairy. At least I found money under my pillow from HIM!
Science had written off any possibility the coelacanth would still exist until fishermen caught one in 1938........and science said the colossal squid was just a myth until one was caught in 2007.........science has a well-documented track record of ignoring supposedly mythical beasts until someone brings in a body --- which is exactly what will happen with Sasquatch someday soon, dumbo!
any true scientist or academic will readily recognize the validity in the statement of "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".
prime example is a wolverine. certainly there are plentiful photos of wolverines; however, most of these photos depict wolverines who are tagged and monitored in wildlife reserves. a quick google image search proves the point - the first page has only one possible legitimate photo taken by an untrained commoner, the rest are staged. And this is a known animal
Notice that you reference Wolverine photos coming from "tagged and monitored" animals in wildlife preserves. First, the very fact that many of them HAVE been tagged means they are prevalent and visible enough to have been LONG known to science. And wildlife preserves aren't small, fenced-in areas - they are wilderness as well. These animals didn't have to be photographed to be known, they have been trapped for centuries. And BF's size should make for easy shots - whether from cameras OR guns.
Bottom line: The supposed evidences for BF's existence ARE SIMPLY NOT PROOF!!! All the evidences I've ever seen or heard, involving BF, COULD have been faked. And the only REAL PROOF is going to be when someone either finds a body OR is able to capture some clear, up close, unmistakable video. Again, to have escaped capture, having been shot or hit by cars, WITHOUT ONE SINGLE ANIMAL HAVING BEEN FOUND AS PROOF, would just about have to make this creature supernatural. And yet, I HOPE I'm wrong.
It is very rare to find a bear carcass in the woods.......and yet we know bears exist........so why does lack of a Sasquatch body definitely rule out existence of an elusive humanoid animal?
Also, many scientists who have extensively studied the Patterson-Gimlin film are still perplexed at all the complex details in it - such as muscular movements and gait anomlies that would be almost impossible to create in a monkey suit back in 1967.
Maybe you need to educate yourself a little, eh ??
Listen, I HOPE Bigfoot DOES exist, it's just that I think there is no concrete evidence to support such. Guess what, finding bear carcasses may be unusual, but they ARE occasionally found. And guess what, one doesn't have to find a bear carcass, because they are frequently seen, shot, photographed, and leave easily identified scat. NOT ONE great apes fossil has EVER been found in North America. A breeding population of BFand NOT ONE has been found shot or hit by a car, or even bones/remains?!!!
@philipatoz ..Well, I'm thinking you haven't done much research on the subject. I don't blame ya, I'm just weird about it, so I research it. Fact is, they HAVE been reported to have been shot (both hit and missed), and hit by vehicles. There HAS been scat found near sightings that cannot be classified yet. And who knows if bones have ever been seen in the wild? Who would think they were BF bones and gather them up to be studied? Anyway, how many bones are just found lying around? Peace.
Again - you're trying to tell me that EVERY SINGLE BF ever shot or hit by a car somehow managed to not have been killed? You're saying that millions of years of North American fossil strata have never produced ANY evidences of a great ape, and yet BF exists? You have UNCLASSIFIED SCAT - which is meaningless as far as PROOF is concerned. And I HAVE been reading the evidences for BF - for over 30 years. To exist without proof or leaving shot, hit or killed remains, for 200 years, is IMPOSSIBLE!!!
Look here, dumbo.......Dr. Meldrum mentions in this clip that chimp remains are almost never found because the acidic soils dissolve bones QUICKLY.......that perfectly explains why no great ape fossils found in N. America........and have you heard of the Coelacanth? It was a fish thought to have died out 65 million yrs. ago -- until a specimen was caught off South Africa in 1938 !!
Open your eyes and your brain, dum-dum........BIGFOOT IS 100% REAL.
Chimp remains that are ALMOST never found - yet clearly, they HAVE been found, as have many other species of monkeys, in the Americas. So we're led to believe that the ONE animal with NO fossil reference is a great ape-like creature. HOW strange is that? Has anyone searched all the hangers in Area 51, it's rumored that a low-flying UFO crashed after hitting an 8-foot Bigfoot that was feeding at the edge of a crop circle, and that the remains of both crew and the Bigfoot are kept frozen there.
So you are trying to convince me of your expertise regarding lack of Bigfoot fossils over a known primate expert like Dr. Jeff Meldrum? Do you know that world-renowned primate scientist Jane Goodall believes in the existence of Sasquatch? So now an armchair "expert" like you is more credible than these decorated scientists ??
Like I said.......your pea brain is quite amusing and I like watching you implode.
Oh, you mean the Dr. Jeff Meldrum whose colleagues are almost universally embarrassed by his BF assertions (Google it!)? Meldrum is also a Mormon who believes God was a man on another planet and he and his goddess wife have offspring that includes Jesus, the devil, and you and me. He also believes good Mormons have potential to become gods of their own planets!
"WORLD-RENOWNED PRIMATE SCIENTIST - Goodall's PhD is in ETHNOLOGY! She simply has been a long-time OBSERVER of primate behavior.
Dr. Meldrum's personal religious views have no impact on his professional scientific opinion........him and Dr. Grover Krantz's expert knowledge of primate & hominid anatomy and gait mechanics could run circles around your little pea brain --- you ever think about that, dippy?
And please explain how your knowledge of hominid evolution could exceed an acknowledged world expert on primates like Jane Goodall ??
Meldrum's beliefs show that he already believes in some extremely far-fetched SUPERNATURAL stuff. Goodall is NOT an evolutionist OR paleontologist. One does NOT have to be an expert to know whether or not such a creature has any fossil evidences - ever hear of published scientific papers? Please send me JUST ONE scientific reference for JUST ONE great ape fossil in the Americas. You know, it would be one thing if you merely HOPED that BF existed, but you lack a healthy, REASONABLE skepticism.
As I already stated........Dr. Meldrum's personal religious views have no impact on his technical expertise of primate anatomy and locomotion.........he is a well-respected crypto-zoologist around the world..........I certainly believe some Bigfoot sightings are mistaken for black bears and such..........but there is enough credible evidence to support the existence of a large humanoid creature. Have you heard about the dermal ridges found on some plaster footprint casts -- impossible to fake!
Have YOU investigated the highly questionable things surrounding Roger Patterson and his shady character? See the MANY doubts brought up about the Patterson film on Wikipedia - many are VERY compelling. Many experts think the film is fake, few don't. And here's a challenge, tell me of ONE, JUST ONE large North American animal that remained undiscovered/unproven for HUNDREDS of years, that has never been found in the fossil record. Just ONE - you can't do it, because such an animal doesn't exist!
Many things have been said about Roger Patterson.........but he was a man of limited means and could NOT afford to build a million-dollar ape suit that could mimic the creature seen in his infamous film! Even the best Hollywoof F/X artists have seen the film and admit they could not create a suit that detailed and complex in 1967 !!
Time to pull your head outta your ass and just admit that Sasquatch is 100% REAL......the Native Americans tell stories about him......does an entire race lie ??
Can't you be mature enough to be respectful in a debate? No one tried to insult YOU! I just brought up some very reasonable doubts. Native Americans believed in MANY things that weren't true, as they were VERY superstitious. You reference a rare fish IN THE OCEAN, in one of the most treacherous seas in the world? Yeah, TONS of guys with rifles and cars were down there to shoot, kill or to even see such a fish. Ridiculous analogy! Hey, you show REAL PROOF, not pseudo evidences, then we'll talk!
How do you explain literally THOUSANDS of detailed reports over the years from credible witnesses regarding Bigfoot sightings? Were they all drunk city slickers seeing shadows on a moonlit night? Many Bigfoot sightings were from cops, game wardens, military, and hunters in broad daylight --- people who know the difference between a bear or moose and a large humanoid creature!
Your pea brain amuses me, though.......can't wait to see you huff and puff your way outta this one!
My comments about juveniles, is that it is much more likely one would have wandered into photo or gun range. And those BF purported to be hit by a car - are we saying that of ALL such supposed incidents, NOT ONE has ever been found. As for supposed intelligence and camouflage - are we saying BF, as opposed to ALL other animals of size, that NOT one has been shot or hit by a car, AND AFTERWARD FOUND? This animal would have to be supernatural, as it defies the fates common to ALL other animals!
Other reasons: Believers in BF always point to the huge numbers of tracks and sightings, meaning such an animal must not be substantially less in number than some relatively common animals. Reports of juvenile or small BFs are almost non-existent. Wouldn't a very young BF occasionally expose himself due to immaturity and lack of fear? Or be brought down by wolves? DNA evidence - supposed unknown primate findings are likely due to human contamination. Thing is, all we truly have is speculation!
@philipatoz actually what isnt true about what you said is there are actually significant number of alleged juvenille and young bigfoot sightings. many books on this topic along with sighting reports have included witnesses who have seen young with an adult . its all either a massive hoax , mass hysteria or bigfoot is the real deal. we may never know.
philpatoz: Not so about the juveniles. The "Jacobs Creature" is a juvenile. Also see Jaime Avalos videos here on YouTube. He is tracking 3 juveniles through the Sierras as we speak.
Other reasons: The Northwest woods have huge vistas with often sparse under-stories, making such a beast an easy target - for both guns, still cameras and motion-sensing cameras. None of these variables have produced proof. This is supposed to be an ENORMOUS animal - that would obviously be lacking an adequate winter food source - meaning he would HAVE to hibernate. No hibernating primates are known to exist. Deep snowdrifts would further expose them. Helicopters would occasionally spot one.
No one would think it cooler than I IF Bigfoot were proven to exist. But there are MANY reasons why I think this is one HUGE snipe hunt! At least since the 1800s, the Northwest woods have been swarming with hunters armed with rifles - not one BF has been killed or proven to have been wounded. NOT ONE carcass or even a few bones have been found. NOT ONE has been hit by a vehicle. NO CREDIBLE photos. There's only one controversial (and blurry) film by a VERY shady guy who was doing a documentary.
@philipatoz Sir, many a big foot has been reported to have been hit, damaging the vehicle only to limp away.
Say if you were in a "hairy carcass" all of your life but with a high intellect; Wouldst you then "pause and pose" for a race that shoots at you of fright? I say that they're out there and due to them having natural hairy "camouflage" all they need do is hunker down and allow our lack of keen senses to not even notice what is not moving "before us".
My father told me that he staged the bigfoot sighting that was filmed in Northern California in 1967. It was concocted by him and his P.R. manager. My dad owned a camera store in San Francisco. He claimed they staged the sighting as a public relations stunt.
Waaay too much evidence out there (footprints, eyewitness accounts) to let this subject be discounted. It intrigues the hell out of me and I will relish the day when this creature is fugured out once and for all!!
sasquatch is real. just look at what the native americans say, though what they have are legends all legends are based off of truth. they will add that the sasquatch may have magical powers and stuff, but that doesent change the fact that what they saw is a sasquatch. and how can you miss identify a sasquatch as a bear, way to different. its real, some people are just to close-minded to believe it or theyare uneducated. do your research people, then decide.
@Robsquatch, Dr. Meldrum is working with what he has to work with; give him a break.
Eyewitness testimony and footprint evidence can send a convict to prison, but when the same methodology is applied to bigfoot research, suddenly it becomes B.S. What gives?
they can't. or maybe better worded, they don't want to. the powers that be are clearly aware of sasquatch's existence, however it would be a huge burden on a number of industries (logging, mining) if bigfoot was to be scientifically recognized, because huge amounts of land will have to be designated in order to protect them. At this point, its still easier for the gov and big logging companies to just pretend they aren't there
Well I see that I am not alone. There must be many people who know the truth about this being, I say this because it is not an ape nor is it a human what can we do to prevent its demise, let alone our own, at the hand of the powers that be.
I've seen big foot...he's one of my cousins, stay away, he has a baaaad attitude...lol! Seriously, I love a good mystery. It doesn't matter if it exists or not...it's enjoying the imagination that matters to me.
I have no reason to believe in a "big foot" However, if there is such a creature I"M GLAD is never been discovered because if it was man would cause them to become totally extinct!!
man could be causing them to go extinct even if they weren't discovered. it is not like men target all animals to poach, most of the endangered species are dieing off of pollution and littering, there are so many species in the ocean that are endangered and we probably not have identified
The scientists here are just hoping to find something. We have the technology to make a determinationabout this issue. We as humans want to believe that we're not alone even if this being is not exactly like us. It'll be just some other creature for mankind to exploit
We've found all kinds of animals, many of which are millions, tens of millions, even hundreds of millions of years old. Animal remains preserve pretty well in cold places like the northwest and Canada. If bigfoot existed in populated areas like the South, we'd know it.
Would it be cool if bigfoot existed? Of course. Is there really any evidence for it? No.
maybe it is out there, there's some VERY vast expanses of wilderness in the pacific northwest. hell, even native americans have stories of bigfoot, before we even coined the term "bigfoot". the people who think we've already explored every single bit of nature are the same ignorant and naive people who believe we're inducing global warming. grow some balls and shove your biased opinions up your ass.
Never found conclusive proof of anything! Even the famous "Patterson film" has long been proven to be a fake!
REAL Scientists with professional trackers, state of the art technology, helicopters with infrared heat vision.. All haven't found a damn thing anywhere!
Just a bunch of delusional yahoos in the woods that want to believe in something so much that they'll waste they're lives trying to find proof of something already proven to be ridiculous.
So he is a real anthropologist and now thinks that there multiple unknown large ape like species in the heavily forested areas of the US and Canada?? That is exactly what he is saying if his foot cast evidense varies by the amount of toes it has.
I dont know about this one. Its kinda like alien abductions. I would love to believe in it but how come no one has ever seen someone abducted? Its always first hand accounts.
its bullshit that these people are making money looking for something that DOES NOT EXIST!
PxEFFINxD 1 month ago
@1:50
Why is it that we have to pull a scientists teeth in order for them to answer a question?
Why couldn't he had just said, "We have never found any bones, but being that these beings live in the forested area's, The forest enviroment will rapidly destroy them."
No, instead you have to corner them into answering. Is the guy unable to step beyond step one in the conversation?
AzBirdDog 2 months ago
Cryptozoology novel see video book trailer
dltanner99 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Yeah, yeah, Bigfoot shmigfoot. Hey if they are so prevalent and around all over the United states, then why I can't I recruit on of them to play football on the offensive line for the University of Texas Longhorns or maybe even the Dallas Cowboys? Just think of the possibilities, with a couple of stud bigfoots on one or both my football teams we would be unbeatable and win championships every year!
vbboyd 1 year ago
Yeah Bigfoot shmigfoot. Hey if they are so prevalent and around all over the United states, then why I can't I recruit on of them to play football on the offensive line for the University of Texas Longhorns or maybe even the Dallas Cowboys? Just think of the possibilities, with a couple of stud bigfoots on one or both my football teams we would be unbeatable and win championships every year!
vbboyd 1 year ago
@vbboyd they tried it with the raiders,but the bigfoot ate the football.
what can ya do?ya can take the foot otta the forest but ya cant take the forest otta the foot..
bobo007xx 6 months ago
Bigfoot is smarter than man. Bigfoot does not live in denial of man's existence. Bigfoot deals with man's existence.
screamdoctor 1 year ago 5
Fucking white people so gay and retarded
Vatoloco4834 1 year ago
The Big Foot is still the greatist joke ever!
GhostDog65 1 year ago
@GhostDog65 Not for long, buddy. The Joke will actually be the people who laughed at witnesses, and didn't bother to look at any of the evidence.
Those people are usually so shallow, they never are capable of wrapping their minds around it, so they still poke jokes and laugh.
The debate will soon be over. But then, those who laugh were never really part of the debate. They just keep giggling and laughing. Sort of like a child who doesn't have the mental brain power to look into it themselves.
AzBirdDog 2 months ago
They are NOT just in the Western United States and Canada, They are all over the United states! This common misconception made me a skeptic for years. Now I know they have been reported all over the U.S. and Canada and in family groups which takes away the whole "Mythical Creature" aspect, It's not just one magical giant roaming the PNW, It's a nomadic species with a viable breeding population.
1Aborne 1 year ago
i think bigfoot might be the caveman.
mcspartan660 1 year ago
ego tystical non beleivers!
nate5539 1 year ago
Try going into the forest and finding any animal. I've hunted miles and miles of heavily traveled game animals and NEVER found a species other than a few scattered deer bones. Even then, that's rare and usually from poachers.
4dales 1 year ago
big foot is not real! people try to make up any bs story about bigfoot.
19t86 1 year ago
@19t86 well fck u non believer
The100mexican 1 year ago
@The100mexican go back to mexico, you illegal alien.
19t86 1 year ago
@19t86 wtf u callen me an alien shit ur fuckin dick wade
The100mexican 1 year ago
Meldrum holds up what he refers to as "a good example of a typical sasquatch print". Truth is we're never shown anything close to this "print" that naturally appears in the mud. What we're shown is one or two "impressions" in the ground and some "expert" pointing out where the toes are and where the heel is because it's not clear. Show prints naturally occuring in mud/clay/dirt that a cast can be made from, with the unmistakable details like the "print" that Meldrum is holding up.
flywithabuzz 2 years ago
Humans are born all the time with extra digits and accidents cause humans to be with less digits than those with which they are born. It would be even stranger or more suspect if there wasn't a deviation every once in a while from the 'normal' 5 toes. Also, other animals from cows to turtles are often found with mutations such as two tails, 5 legs, etc. why not Bigfoot?
TheFlames40 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Tonight on National Geographic; Who gives a shit about bigfoot?
PUNITislaughedat 2 years ago
With a feature on: a whole fucking lot of people, its on national geographic so apparently millions
fluic 2 years ago 2
and also bird's yes bird's are key,bird's can warn animal's up to 700 yard's away that's somthing's in the wood's,and also your sent can carry into the wood's for up to a mile,bigfoot isnt stupid they need to stop making these bigfoot show's where people go into the wood's looking for them, you will never find bigfoot and there's a 99.9% chance you'll ever see one. i think 15 to 20 people a year see one and i mean canada and maybe the swamp's down in georgia,maybe washington state. that's it
akeemak22 2 years ago
what i think like gorilla's they stay in thick high grass eating all day lying down on their side. so the only way you could find them is if you where to walk up on them.
they dont walk during the day,they may stop looking for food when the sun rise's.they stay in one spot all day.
i believe there are only 2,000 to 4,000 of them and they stay in group's of 7 or more watching through thicket's for any sighn's of human's or wildlife.
85% of report's are false or joke's.
akeemak22 2 years ago
(continued) video & digital cameras mean it's only a matter of time before someone is able to get good, quality imagery of one of these creatures. Of course that won't constitute "proof" from a scientific standpoint, but it will certainly cause some people to reevaluate their belief in BFs non-existence and will increase interest from the scientific community that will eventually result in physical proof.
slysphinx 2 years ago
I have never seen a bigfoot, but as someone who is an avid hunter/outdoorsman who happens to live in the Pacific Northwest I can assure you that there is a LOT of very rugged, dense, remote country the make it VERY difficult to find even common, well-known animals such as deer, elk, and bears. I think it's quite possible that an intelligent, primarily nocturnal animal with a low population density such as BF could avoid detection for a long time. But the recent advent of game cameras and small
slysphinx 2 years ago
I hear a lot of people saying that there are so many hunters and hiker out there with video cameras and have not seen anything like a Bigfoot! I don't know if I would want to post any picture or tell anybody what I saw! For one you get made a fool of and people who had no problem believing everything you said up to that point all of the sudden question you like you made it all up. I believe there are a lot of unreported sightings out there!
busybottle 2 years ago 2
Some interesting POV and some very childish name calling. Truth is neither side has conclusive proof of bigfoots existence or nonexistence. Personally I think there is enough evidence to warrant serious scientific investigation. Is anything conclusive? No but there is something going on. Sightings span more than 100 years, said sightings are very consistent with the known behaviors of other great apes and significant behavior patterns unique to the Sasquatch have been noticed.
HereBeADragon 2 years ago
Continuing this thought. Lets look at some of the problems. Biggest question is where is the body/fossil/etc. Forests are very acidic environments remains do not last long. In fact the least represented creatures in the fossil record are woodland critters. Most of the north american fossils we have are from tarpits or deserts. Even gigantopithecus fossils are limited to only a few teeth. As for modern bodies if they are an intelligent creature than perhaps they take care of their injured or dead
HereBeADragon 2 years ago
The idea of Sasquatch taking care of their dead has some anicdotal evidence. There are a few (very few) reports of people killing a bigfoot. After which other bigfeet chased said person off and claimed the body. Perhaps they bury their dead. Lastly to the remoteness of the pacific northwest. While many areas are frequented by hikers and hunters (which are where a majority of the reports come from btw) there are also areas where no one has set foot in 100 years or more.
HereBeADragon 2 years ago
@HereBeADragon - I agree SOMETHING is going on, but the question is WHAT. To me, especially the fact that 200 years of NW hunters with rifles has produced NOT ONE BF is telling. Even hunters, concealed with the best camoflage and making the slightest movement, have frequently been shot and killed by accident. NO animal stays in thick brush all the time. And clearly, if we are to believe the reported sightings, BFs clearly are not just frequenting extremely remote areas. Continues:
philipatoz 2 years ago
@HereBeADragon, to continue, a BF from a good distance would easily be mistaken for a large bear (or vice versa). You can't tell me countless hunters would not have had opportunities to kill a BF. Certainly, thinking one was a trophy bear, hunters would quickly scope and shoot such a creature from a large distance. Here is a sincere question, I'm just curious: Do you or others think BF could be a supernatural phenomenon? Because BF defies evidential parameters common to ALL large forest animals.
philipatoz 2 years ago
I agree the BF is a difficult creature to understand. Why one hasn't been captured I cant say for sure. Its theoriezed that BFs are very intelligent, nocturnal and travel in family groups that may care for their sick and injured. These could explain why no dead are found. As for why none have been killed well we only know the haven't been found. There are reports of them being shot. Being injured but bodies not being found. If their dead are cared for than it would not be odd to not find a body
HereBeADragon 2 years ago
Bodies disappear quickly in an acidic environment. If bodies are buried than there would likely be nothing to find in a short time. Consider the bodies of people that go missing in the forests every year and are never found. One somewhat chilling thought as well is what happens to those hunters that go missing every year? Could some of them had sighted and shot a BF only to suffer reprisal at the hands of its kin? If this creature exists its not going to be a big teddy bear.
HereBeADragon 2 years ago 7
@HereBeADragon the indians have said all along that bigfoot eats people.
bobo007xx 6 months ago
Yes, I realize a chimp is NOT a monkey. But the search for Bigfoot IS making a monkey out of a lot of otherwise intelligent people. The elusiveness purported to be demonstrated by Bigfoot puts it in the realm of the supernatural, as it defies all reason and logic that such a HUGE animal could remain hidden from science. If we were looking for such an animal in the Amazon, somewhere extremely dense AND remote, maybe, just maybe I could be open to the possibility. But not in the Pacific Northwest.
philipatoz 2 years ago
Do you realize how remote and dense the Pacific Northwest and western Canada is? It's over a half million square miles of sparsely-populated forest that could easily support a sustainable breeding population of 2500 Bigfoots with food, shelter, and hideouts !!
You are making yourself look quite dumb in here........I suggest you quit before it gets any uglier.
Hunkola 2 years ago
The Northwest woods have enormous vistas, expansive meadows and large, open forest understories, which make for easy targets and viewing. This is not like the Amazon, with the same density levels of low-growing plants. And these areas, although often remote, are teaming with hunters and hikers, many with video and still cameras. The burden of proof is on those championing this supposed animal's existence. So far, lots of doubts, but NO Bigfoots for proof. And truthfully, I wish I was wrong.
philipatoz 2 years ago
No, the burden of proving Bigfoot does not exist is on DUMMIES like you, moron........evidently you can prove why it was impossible for hominid descendants of Gigantopithecus in Asia to cross the temperate-forested Bering land bridge millions of yrs. ago into North America.........and then let us hear how you can explain away literally THOUSANDS of reliable eyewitness reports of a large humanoid creature roaming N. America in the past 500 years!
Hunkola 2 years ago
So I am the moron because I have reasonable doubts, supported by the VAST majority of scientists (guess they would be my fellow morons), that it is impossible for such a huge animal, in breeding numbers, to not leave ONE body, bone, fossil or clear photo, and avoid being killed by hunters or cars, dying from disease or epidemics. NO known species has EVER done this! And YOU are just pissed because YOU believe in the equivalent of the Tooth Fairy. At least I found money under my pillow from HIM!
philipatoz 2 years ago
Science had written off any possibility the coelacanth would still exist until fishermen caught one in 1938........and science said the colossal squid was just a myth until one was caught in 2007.........science has a well-documented track record of ignoring supposedly mythical beasts until someone brings in a body --- which is exactly what will happen with Sasquatch someday soon, dumbo!
Hunkola 2 years ago
any true scientist or academic will readily recognize the validity in the statement of "absence of evidence is not evidence of absence".
prime example is a wolverine. certainly there are plentiful photos of wolverines; however, most of these photos depict wolverines who are tagged and monitored in wildlife reserves. a quick google image search proves the point - the first page has only one possible legitimate photo taken by an untrained commoner, the rest are staged. And this is a known animal
fluic 2 years ago
Notice that you reference Wolverine photos coming from "tagged and monitored" animals in wildlife preserves. First, the very fact that many of them HAVE been tagged means they are prevalent and visible enough to have been LONG known to science. And wildlife preserves aren't small, fenced-in areas - they are wilderness as well. These animals didn't have to be photographed to be known, they have been trapped for centuries. And BF's size should make for easy shots - whether from cameras OR guns.
philipatoz 2 years ago
Bottom line: The supposed evidences for BF's existence ARE SIMPLY NOT PROOF!!! All the evidences I've ever seen or heard, involving BF, COULD have been faked. And the only REAL PROOF is going to be when someone either finds a body OR is able to capture some clear, up close, unmistakable video. Again, to have escaped capture, having been shot or hit by cars, WITHOUT ONE SINGLE ANIMAL HAVING BEEN FOUND AS PROOF, would just about have to make this creature supernatural. And yet, I HOPE I'm wrong.
philipatoz 2 years ago
It is very rare to find a bear carcass in the woods.......and yet we know bears exist........so why does lack of a Sasquatch body definitely rule out existence of an elusive humanoid animal?
Also, many scientists who have extensively studied the Patterson-Gimlin film are still perplexed at all the complex details in it - such as muscular movements and gait anomlies that would be almost impossible to create in a monkey suit back in 1967.
Maybe you need to educate yourself a little, eh ??
Hunkola 2 years ago
Listen, I HOPE Bigfoot DOES exist, it's just that I think there is no concrete evidence to support such. Guess what, finding bear carcasses may be unusual, but they ARE occasionally found. And guess what, one doesn't have to find a bear carcass, because they are frequently seen, shot, photographed, and leave easily identified scat. NOT ONE great apes fossil has EVER been found in North America. A breeding population of BFand NOT ONE has been found shot or hit by a car, or even bones/remains?!!!
philipatoz 2 years ago
@philipatoz ..Well, I'm thinking you haven't done much research on the subject. I don't blame ya, I'm just weird about it, so I research it. Fact is, they HAVE been reported to have been shot (both hit and missed), and hit by vehicles. There HAS been scat found near sightings that cannot be classified yet. And who knows if bones have ever been seen in the wild? Who would think they were BF bones and gather them up to be studied? Anyway, how many bones are just found lying around? Peace.
smittysturn 2 years ago
Again - you're trying to tell me that EVERY SINGLE BF ever shot or hit by a car somehow managed to not have been killed? You're saying that millions of years of North American fossil strata have never produced ANY evidences of a great ape, and yet BF exists? You have UNCLASSIFIED SCAT - which is meaningless as far as PROOF is concerned. And I HAVE been reading the evidences for BF - for over 30 years. To exist without proof or leaving shot, hit or killed remains, for 200 years, is IMPOSSIBLE!!!
philipatoz 2 years ago
Look here, dumbo.......Dr. Meldrum mentions in this clip that chimp remains are almost never found because the acidic soils dissolve bones QUICKLY.......that perfectly explains why no great ape fossils found in N. America........and have you heard of the Coelacanth? It was a fish thought to have died out 65 million yrs. ago -- until a specimen was caught off South Africa in 1938 !!
Open your eyes and your brain, dum-dum........BIGFOOT IS 100% REAL.
Hunkola 2 years ago
Chimp remains that are ALMOST never found - yet clearly, they HAVE been found, as have many other species of monkeys, in the Americas. So we're led to believe that the ONE animal with NO fossil reference is a great ape-like creature. HOW strange is that? Has anyone searched all the hangers in Area 51, it's rumored that a low-flying UFO crashed after hitting an 8-foot Bigfoot that was feeding at the edge of a crop circle, and that the remains of both crew and the Bigfoot are kept frozen there.
philipatoz 2 years ago
So you are trying to convince me of your expertise regarding lack of Bigfoot fossils over a known primate expert like Dr. Jeff Meldrum? Do you know that world-renowned primate scientist Jane Goodall believes in the existence of Sasquatch? So now an armchair "expert" like you is more credible than these decorated scientists ??
Like I said.......your pea brain is quite amusing and I like watching you implode.
Hunkola 2 years ago
Oh, you mean the Dr. Jeff Meldrum whose colleagues are almost universally embarrassed by his BF assertions (Google it!)? Meldrum is also a Mormon who believes God was a man on another planet and he and his goddess wife have offspring that includes Jesus, the devil, and you and me. He also believes good Mormons have potential to become gods of their own planets!
"WORLD-RENOWNED PRIMATE SCIENTIST - Goodall's PhD is in ETHNOLOGY! She simply has been a long-time OBSERVER of primate behavior.
philipatoz 2 years ago
Dr. Meldrum's personal religious views have no impact on his professional scientific opinion........him and Dr. Grover Krantz's expert knowledge of primate & hominid anatomy and gait mechanics could run circles around your little pea brain --- you ever think about that, dippy?
And please explain how your knowledge of hominid evolution could exceed an acknowledged world expert on primates like Jane Goodall ??
DUMMY.......
Hunkola 2 years ago
Meldrum's beliefs show that he already believes in some extremely far-fetched SUPERNATURAL stuff. Goodall is NOT an evolutionist OR paleontologist. One does NOT have to be an expert to know whether or not such a creature has any fossil evidences - ever hear of published scientific papers? Please send me JUST ONE scientific reference for JUST ONE great ape fossil in the Americas. You know, it would be one thing if you merely HOPED that BF existed, but you lack a healthy, REASONABLE skepticism.
philipatoz 2 years ago
As I already stated........Dr. Meldrum's personal religious views have no impact on his technical expertise of primate anatomy and locomotion.........he is a well-respected crypto-zoologist around the world..........I certainly believe some Bigfoot sightings are mistaken for black bears and such..........but there is enough credible evidence to support the existence of a large humanoid creature. Have you heard about the dermal ridges found on some plaster footprint casts -- impossible to fake!
Hunkola 2 years ago
Have YOU investigated the highly questionable things surrounding Roger Patterson and his shady character? See the MANY doubts brought up about the Patterson film on Wikipedia - many are VERY compelling. Many experts think the film is fake, few don't. And here's a challenge, tell me of ONE, JUST ONE large North American animal that remained undiscovered/unproven for HUNDREDS of years, that has never been found in the fossil record. Just ONE - you can't do it, because such an animal doesn't exist!
philipatoz 2 years ago
Many things have been said about Roger Patterson.........but he was a man of limited means and could NOT afford to build a million-dollar ape suit that could mimic the creature seen in his infamous film! Even the best Hollywoof F/X artists have seen the film and admit they could not create a suit that detailed and complex in 1967 !!
Time to pull your head outta your ass and just admit that Sasquatch is 100% REAL......the Native Americans tell stories about him......does an entire race lie ??
Hunkola 2 years ago
Can't you be mature enough to be respectful in a debate? No one tried to insult YOU! I just brought up some very reasonable doubts. Native Americans believed in MANY things that weren't true, as they were VERY superstitious. You reference a rare fish IN THE OCEAN, in one of the most treacherous seas in the world? Yeah, TONS of guys with rifles and cars were down there to shoot, kill or to even see such a fish. Ridiculous analogy! Hey, you show REAL PROOF, not pseudo evidences, then we'll talk!
philipatoz 2 years ago
How do you explain literally THOUSANDS of detailed reports over the years from credible witnesses regarding Bigfoot sightings? Were they all drunk city slickers seeing shadows on a moonlit night? Many Bigfoot sightings were from cops, game wardens, military, and hunters in broad daylight --- people who know the difference between a bear or moose and a large humanoid creature!
Your pea brain amuses me, though.......can't wait to see you huff and puff your way outta this one!
Hunkola 2 years ago
My comments about juveniles, is that it is much more likely one would have wandered into photo or gun range. And those BF purported to be hit by a car - are we saying that of ALL such supposed incidents, NOT ONE has ever been found. As for supposed intelligence and camouflage - are we saying BF, as opposed to ALL other animals of size, that NOT one has been shot or hit by a car, AND AFTERWARD FOUND? This animal would have to be supernatural, as it defies the fates common to ALL other animals!
philipatoz 2 years ago
Other reasons: Believers in BF always point to the huge numbers of tracks and sightings, meaning such an animal must not be substantially less in number than some relatively common animals. Reports of juvenile or small BFs are almost non-existent. Wouldn't a very young BF occasionally expose himself due to immaturity and lack of fear? Or be brought down by wolves? DNA evidence - supposed unknown primate findings are likely due to human contamination. Thing is, all we truly have is speculation!
philipatoz 2 years ago
@philipatoz actually what isnt true about what you said is there are actually significant number of alleged juvenille and young bigfoot sightings. many books on this topic along with sighting reports have included witnesses who have seen young with an adult . its all either a massive hoax , mass hysteria or bigfoot is the real deal. we may never know.
tonyagrestic 2 years ago
philpatoz: Not so about the juveniles. The "Jacobs Creature" is a juvenile. Also see Jaime Avalos videos here on YouTube. He is tracking 3 juveniles through the Sierras as we speak.
kapacon 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Other reasons: The Northwest woods have huge vistas with often sparse under-stories, making such a beast an easy target - for both guns, still cameras and motion-sensing cameras. None of these variables have produced proof. This is supposed to be an ENORMOUS animal - that would obviously be lacking an adequate winter food source - meaning he would HAVE to hibernate. No hibernating primates are known to exist. Deep snowdrifts would further expose them. Helicopters would occasionally spot one.
philipatoz 2 years ago
Comment removed
philipatoz 2 years ago
No one would think it cooler than I IF Bigfoot were proven to exist. But there are MANY reasons why I think this is one HUGE snipe hunt! At least since the 1800s, the Northwest woods have been swarming with hunters armed with rifles - not one BF has been killed or proven to have been wounded. NOT ONE carcass or even a few bones have been found. NOT ONE has been hit by a vehicle. NO CREDIBLE photos. There's only one controversial (and blurry) film by a VERY shady guy who was doing a documentary.
philipatoz 2 years ago
@philipatoz Sir, many a big foot has been reported to have been hit, damaging the vehicle only to limp away.
Say if you were in a "hairy carcass" all of your life but with a high intellect; Wouldst you then "pause and pose" for a race that shoots at you of fright? I say that they're out there and due to them having natural hairy "camouflage" all they need do is hunker down and allow our lack of keen senses to not even notice what is not moving "before us".
Behind us is a different matter.
liabatud67 2 years ago
My father told me that he staged the bigfoot sighting that was filmed in Northern California in 1967. It was concocted by him and his P.R. manager. My dad owned a camera store in San Francisco. He claimed they staged the sighting as a public relations stunt.
twedeldee1 2 years ago
@twedeldee1 so your father was roger patterson ?
tonyagrestic 2 years ago
twedeldee: Yeah, and you joined YouTube today just to tell us that..............
kapacon 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dislike, Why would a reason and science channel try to cash in on a freakin obvious hoax? I'm totally disappointed they are airing this bullshit.
mockingarab 2 years ago
Comment removed
mockingarab 2 years ago
way to much evidence? theres only clay footprints and eyewitnesses just want to be famous
mikecheesy1 2 years ago
Bullshit ?? Last i checked Meldrum's profession is science but im pretty sure you have a better profession right (sarcasm )
Masa8204 2 years ago
Waaay too much evidence out there (footprints, eyewitness accounts) to let this subject be discounted. It intrigues the hell out of me and I will relish the day when this creature is fugured out once and for all!!
bigfoot2yeti 2 years ago
sasquatch is real. just look at what the native americans say, though what they have are legends all legends are based off of truth. they will add that the sasquatch may have magical powers and stuff, but that doesent change the fact that what they saw is a sasquatch. and how can you miss identify a sasquatch as a bear, way to different. its real, some people are just to close-minded to believe it or theyare uneducated. do your research people, then decide.
25milesmile 2 years ago
Big foot is real and there is billions of it
josephgelb 2 years ago
try 3,000 buddy
Dkw23kingpenguin 2 years ago
Actually, there are 300 of them, and they're all Greek!
selatik1 2 years ago
@Robsquatch Yes, some can't see the forest for the trees...
And some use science as a refuge.
selatik1 2 years ago
@Robsquatch, Dr. Meldrum is working with what he has to work with; give him a break.
Eyewitness testimony and footprint evidence can send a convict to prison, but when the same methodology is applied to bigfoot research, suddenly it becomes B.S. What gives?
selatik1 2 years ago
bigfoot sexual bigfoot
Murdilizer 2 years ago
lol, I cant stop luaghing
MrDimenticato 2 years ago
just send armed forces into the woods and hunt that mother bitch down!
upurhoe12321 2 years ago
they can't. or maybe better worded, they don't want to. the powers that be are clearly aware of sasquatch's existence, however it would be a huge burden on a number of industries (logging, mining) if bigfoot was to be scientifically recognized, because huge amounts of land will have to be designated in order to protect them. At this point, its still easier for the gov and big logging companies to just pretend they aren't there
fluic 2 years ago
Well I see that I am not alone. There must be many people who know the truth about this being, I say this because it is not an ape nor is it a human what can we do to prevent its demise, let alone our own, at the hand of the powers that be.
bubblejomay 2 years ago
Comment removed
d0861 2 years ago
I've seen big foot...he's one of my cousins, stay away, he has a baaaad attitude...lol! Seriously, I love a good mystery. It doesn't matter if it exists or not...it's enjoying the imagination that matters to me.
amatron201 2 years ago
@amatron201
Thats what makes bigfoot, ufos, and loch ness all so popular.
Same thing with Dec 2012
Edubb336 2 years ago
I'm CGI'ed to death...I'd love to see a REAL mystery solved. Then again, maybe not. Sometimes the longing (search) is better that getting (knowing).
amatron201 2 years ago
I'm sure that someone would of seen one by now considering how big it is...
ChowZeb 2 years ago
Uh. How do you think the story started? There is always some truth to a myth.
Typicus 2 years ago
fail
ChowZeb 2 years ago
bigfoot does not exist
juanster555 2 years ago
@juanster555 You can't support that conclusion.
selatik1 2 years ago
hek ya i can
1: no one has had good enough proof
2:people just want these stupid scientist to buy their fake footprints for millions of dollars
3: ur stupid
juanster555 2 years ago
@juanster555, You're not exactly versed in the ancient art of rhetoric, are you?
Hurling playground insults can hardly be considered supporting ones position.
Perhaps you're simply steadying yourself for your next camping trip...
selatik1 2 years ago
dude... -_-
u make no sense
juanster555 2 years ago
@juanster555 That's likely due to a need for a larger vocubulary.
selatik1 2 years ago
maybe it is maybe it isnt so shutup
juanster555 2 years ago
@juanster555 ...Kierkegaard?
selatik1 2 years ago
what about the guy?
juanster555 2 years ago
@juanster555 oh, it's just that you seem to be positively channeling that Danish philosopher. Uncanny.
selatik1 2 years ago
ya i am what of it? -,-
juanster555 2 years ago
@juanster555 Ånden af Søren Kierkegaard, Deres manglende evne til at forstå sarkasme er uventet, men imponerende!
selatik1 2 years ago
what laguage are u speaking?
juanster555 2 years ago
This isn't science. Pro-Bigfoot people have a confirmation bias and are not starting with the null hypothesis.
Proper scientific rigor would dispel any ideas of bigfoot.
purplefuzzythings 2 years ago
I want a pet chuman. We just need to find a female chimp to mate with...
movieguystarraisin 2 years ago
Thats gross. Haha.
TzeoDerek 2 years ago
not real
Hyorino 2 years ago
@Hyorino keep telling yourself that on your next camping trip!
selatik1 2 years ago
What is this!!!!! Blind speculation should not be on National Geographic!!!!!
WeatherReport42 2 years ago
@WeatherReport42 It's not blind speculation.
selatik1 2 years ago
fake faggotry
caifan111 2 years ago
fake....................
peeps6901 2 years ago
I have no reason to believe in a "big foot" However, if there is such a creature I"M GLAD is never been discovered because if it was man would cause them to become totally extinct!!
99minerkc 2 years ago
man could be causing them to go extinct even if they weren't discovered. it is not like men target all animals to poach, most of the endangered species are dieing off of pollution and littering, there are so many species in the ocean that are endangered and we probably not have identified
mysteryblack2 2 years ago
So how is it that the "Bigfoot" can hide the remains of their dead so well? Since no body remains have ever been found in recorded history?
GhostDog65 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Giving out LOCKERZ invites RIGHT NOW!
Just send me a message with this format:
E-mail: (Lockerz is INVITE ONLY!)
Short Message:
Thank you! And remember,prize redemption is coming soon!
dummynator854 2 years ago
who gives ah SHIT about big foot !!!
snoop8492 2 years ago
ehhh. obivously you dont live in the pacific.
antbuffy123 2 years ago
yo, osama.
im really happy for you, ima let you Finnish.
but bigfoot was one of the best hide and seek-ers of all time! ALL TIME!
STANTL3R 2 years ago 4
manbearpig
xrangerx 2 years ago
@xrangerx manbearpig is a very important issue, and is a very big threat. we must stop manbearpig!
medievalman86 2 years ago
yes!
todo3000 2 years ago
Bigfoot looks a lot like my Grandpa. Hmmm... could it be that?
Nmodest06 2 years ago
lol
99minerkc 2 years ago
No bones huh? Try looking for toenails!! LoL!
707RipOtee 2 years ago
rofl!! good one but those that get caught up in this stuff will not appreciate your humor like me!! : )
99minerkc 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
FAKE AND GAY.....
Winterisonyou2b 2 years ago
Hmmmm.....still not convinced.
mbofny 2 years ago
i killed all of the bigfoot and sold their skins
kklloopp 2 years ago
yu killed my brothers D:
juli55cutie 2 years ago
The scientists here are just hoping to find something. We have the technology to make a determinationabout this issue. We as humans want to believe that we're not alone even if this being is not exactly like us. It'll be just some other creature for mankind to exploit
hadbanger1 2 years ago 2
We've found all kinds of animals, many of which are millions, tens of millions, even hundreds of millions of years old. Animal remains preserve pretty well in cold places like the northwest and Canada. If bigfoot existed in populated areas like the South, we'd know it.
Would it be cool if bigfoot existed? Of course. Is there really any evidence for it? No.
GuppyPal 2 years ago 2
maybe it is out there, there's some VERY vast expanses of wilderness in the pacific northwest. hell, even native americans have stories of bigfoot, before we even coined the term "bigfoot". the people who think we've already explored every single bit of nature are the same ignorant and naive people who believe we're inducing global warming. grow some balls and shove your biased opinions up your ass.
welcomegohome 2 years ago
I saw Mrs. BigFoot kissin Santa Claus about 3 weeks ago!
midnightowl1128 2 years ago 2
Comment removed
pumasination 2 years ago
Never found conclusive proof of anything! Even the famous "Patterson film" has long been proven to be a fake!
REAL Scientists with professional trackers, state of the art technology, helicopters with infrared heat vision.. All haven't found a damn thing anywhere!
Just a bunch of delusional yahoos in the woods that want to believe in something so much that they'll waste they're lives trying to find proof of something already proven to be ridiculous.
ubersteigen 2 years ago
its fake. NEXT
MastaShake99 2 years ago 2
BIGFOOT IS FAKE
study over.
wolfthing11 2 years ago 4
Cut it out National Geographic, the guy who had the famous bigfoot footage admitted using a gorilla suit and he said he created the hoax.
excaliber2010 2 years ago 3
Bigfoot is real. So are fairies and mermaids and unicorns that fly over the rainbow. I'm a leprechaun, too.
kcmj62 2 years ago
@kcmj62 That's tight so can I have some gold?
TheAmefist 2 years ago
Heck yeah I can make it come out of my fingers!
kcmj62 2 years ago
@kcmj62 Dang that is beast let me have some.
TheAmefist 2 years ago
since its been so long, do you thing there was only one big foot, or now a family of bigfoots?.
chhayjolly91 2 years ago
So he is a real anthropologist and now thinks that there multiple unknown large ape like species in the heavily forested areas of the US and Canada?? That is exactly what he is saying if his foot cast evidense varies by the amount of toes it has.
jedimastereric 2 years ago
Evolution, schmevolution....pfft!
MrUnderdog1970 2 years ago
Its a really crazy guy living in the woods wearing a gorilla suit.
GeminiAzules 2 years ago
i think studying big foot is a waste of life..
LookyPeter 2 years ago 7
so thats where atheists come from
redwine65 2 years ago
I dont know about this one. Its kinda like alien abductions. I would love to believe in it but how come no one has ever seen someone abducted? Its always first hand accounts.
VAR1UM 2 years ago 4
OMG FINALLY SOMEONES WHO AGREES WITH ME! i want to belive but i can't because it hasent haappen to me and i havent seen any U.F.O..!!
Boxerman2142 2 years ago
How can somebody be an expert on a fictional creature?
NoFocus418 2 years ago 13
That's exactly what I thought...
Imperiused 2 years ago 2
@NoFocus418
That was exactly my question right at the beginning of the video when he says "Dr. Jeff Meldrum is the world's leading expert..." I was like wtf? lol
jurbina15 2 years ago
second!!!
ncmpracer13 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
first!!!!!
ImHighOffLife 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
first!!!
ImHighOffLife 2 years ago
@ImHighOffLife congratulations
BuddhaLovax420x 2 years ago 4