Added: 2 years ago
From: MaXCuthbert
Views: 43,953
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (75)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Este Rafa era impresionante cómo defendía. Llegaba a pelotas increíbles, era un frontón que te devolvía cualquier cosa. Además, esto era importante por el efecto psicológico que creaba sobre el rival. Imaginate un tipo que le tirás, le tirás, le tirás y lo tenés que matar 5 veces para ganarle el punto. Te come energías, te desmoraliza y se fortalece él. Y nótese que no tenía tantos winners, sino que provocaba el error del rival al invitarlo a tirar y tirar. La mejor versión de Rafa, 2005-2006.

  • thanks for tainting this video with your dumb comment, just proves my point that Federer fans are pretentious pricks.

  • this has gotta to be one of the greatest clay court matches of all time. how can it not make you a fan of Coria?

  • wtf is up with the stupid annotation @ 00:52 ??

  • @TheWinnie2010 ha, I lol'd when I saw that

  • Lástima por Coria, un jugador del nivel de un Nº1 que le jugó en contra su propia cabeza.

    Saludos.

  • damn at such a young age 

  • io c'ero, i was there

  • Nadal nadal nadal , dios ya dejen de joder con nadal. Lastima que Coria se retiro pero Coria siempre fue y sera mejor que Nadal, a nadal lo cubre la atp por eso nunca lo paran con las drogas y todo eso, Coria no se droga viejo ni nada, a el lo cagaron por envidia. Igual ya olvidense de Nadal porque ahora el amo es Nole Djokovic AJJAJA pobre Nadal no le va a ganar nunca mas. Envidia le tienen al serbio, el mejor del mundo LEJOOOSS , hasta Murray le puede ganar a Nadal. JAJAJA vamos djokovic.!

  • @soydeespana Yo tambien si me injecto 50 sustancias diferentes antes de cada partido le gano a cualquiera. Revisa un poco los datos y fijate la cantidad de jugadores que hizo una queja referida a la "supuesta" velocidad del gallego ese. Ya se dieron cuenta todos, se droga el pendejo. Igual cuando lo agarro Del Potro en su mejor momento lo humillo, y ni te hablo de Nalbandian sino tendrias que borrar el comentario bobo ese. Ah me olvidaba, Maradona gano solo la copa del mundo. Saludos

  • Nadal es un falopero, es una mentira toda su carrera fue y seguira siendo un chamuyo. Dale Roger ponete las pilas...!

  • @scooterward100 falopero ?? Demuestra que eres envidioso. Nadal ganó más títulos, DINERO Y ADMIRACIÓN DE LO QUE NUNCA SE CONSIGA EN SU VIDA. ¿Y Los drogadictos ARGENTINA COMO CORIA, CAÑAS Y PUERTA? Y EL CERDO MARADROGA. Nadal ganó nueve torneos de Grand Slam, 19 títulos de los amos y violaron a Federer en Roland Garros en 2008 por 6-1 y 6-3 y 6-0. USTED DESEA HACER ESO.

  • omg, this is reallly tough tennis. wow.

  • both plays their best tennis.beautiful match.

  • @ALBERTOMARIOGUTIE pienso lo mismo. Coria sufrió mucha mala suerte para el gran talento que tenía, y el gallego de mierda este es una mentira, solo una mentira. Espero que Federer vuelva a poner pronto las cosas en su lugar.

  • @MYHEARTMUTMINI10 es una mentira? que queres decir con eso? articula un poco. Nadal juega como la puta madre, y si que sea un gallego te impide ver eso sos un pelotudo. el partido estaba para que cualquiera de los dos se lo lleve, nadal gano bien.

  • @Megadeth6633 por como hablas sos argentino. En primer lugar a vos no te falté el respeto, así que metete en tus cosas en vez de putear a otro :). Y segundo que yo opino de Nadal que le falta humildad en las derrotas, siempre reconoce a sus rivales cuando les gana, cuando pierde siempre mete excusas de lesiones u otras boludeces en vez de reconocer que le ganaron bien. Además, y sobre todo cuando era más joven, te festejaba en la cara. No es una mierda dentro de la cancha? Mejor cerrá el pico.

  • @tiko345678 Gil será toda tu parentesca, sudaca imbécil. Los hechos reales son éstos: Coria fue un jugador decente en su tiempo, pero ahora está acabado y retirado hace 4 años. Empezamos a hablar de "Si ésto pasara", "Si esto no sé qué", "Si ésto no se cuánto". Lo que debió hacer es estar quietecito y no doparse. Para tu información, la ATP no le suministró nada, sino una empresa norteamericana que se llama "Universal Nutrition" en New Brumswick. Lee antes de comentar nada.

  • @ASPERGER0584 infobae.com ; Coria sale del ostracismo con una millonaria demanda. Lo miras en el google y lo buscas, analfabeto.

  • he plays this level of clay court tennis against the best clay courter other than hinself before he wins roland garros.incredible

  • @ALBERTOMARIOGUTIE Ese gallego tiene 9 grand slams, 1 oro olimpico y 18 masters 1000 con 24 años pero bueno, nada comparado al talento y palmarés de Coria claro...

  • @infielesno Sí. También puedes decir que Coria es un drogadicto por haber ingerido una vitamina contaminada con "androlona". Si lo sumas a la lista del palmarés de Coria, queda jodido para toda la vida como le pasó a Maradona. Mucho talento, pero al final, tanto talento los cagó. xD

  • wow ¡¡¡ that is power

  • Comment removed

  • @mfreemanflynn , let us count how many hard court masters series are there in a year.Indian wells,Miami,Montreol,cincinatt­i,Paris,Shanghai,Masters cup in London.Altogether 7.Now hard court slams-US and australian open-2.Grass court slam-wimb.So Federer`s favorite surface tournaments are 10 in a year.That is 10 main tournaments are held on fed`s surface of choice. Now let us assess main tournaments held on clay-Monte carlo,Rome,Madrid and French open.So in total 4 tournaments favour Nadal.

  • @mfreemanflynn ,if one assess one can see that 7 hard court masters are held in a year and 2 hard slams plus 1 grass slam.10 main tournaments are held on fed`s favorite surfaces.Only 3 masters are held on clay 1 clay slam-only 4 tournaments are held on Nadal`s surface of choice.It is just that Nadal has overcome every odds to win on every surface.When Nadal starts to win on a surface considered unfavourable to him,suddenly Nadal haters begin to name those surfaces as slow ect.How irrational!

  • @mfreemanflynn ,Let us try to understand the surface.The wimbledon which is considered as slow by Nadal haters account for most no of aces among grandslams this year.In the so called slow wimb surface,Isner and Mahut served 100 aces each in a single match.200 aces in a match!,on slow surface!.At aus open,i agree that ballbounces higher than on US open.But it is still hard court and cannot slide on that surface.Who were the winners of Aus open last five years?2006,2007-Fed.2008-Djoko­,2009-Nad.

  • @mfreemanflynn ,In Aus open,winners of last five are-2006,2007-Fed,2008-Djoko,2­009-Nadal,2010-Federer.Up until Nadal won the 2009 Aus open,the surface was fast.In 2009 Nadal won and suddenly surface became slow.This year Federer won and surface suddenly became fast.Nadal haters are like chameleons which changes its colour according to the sorroundings.When it is unconcievable for them to avccept the simple fact that Nadal worked hard to master every surfaces,nadalhaters begin to concoct rubbish.

  • @menakandy it isn't true for hard court but its true on slow wimbledon. It started there because federer can serve better, nadal wouldn't have won if wimbledon is fast and more players will have a good s&v technique en route if this is the case. But the hard court GS was always same, players cannot escape without any rallies there.

  • @menakandy Australian surface became more slow in 2008, when rebound ace became plexicushion. The rebound is also higher.

  • @LawrenceTheFirst I don't agree. It's even up for debate. No matter how matches he won against him and no matter how he's number #1 right now, Federer's still on top due to his number of Grand Slams and titles obtained. Furthermore, it's childish to think Nadal is better than Federer because if you look at the matches played against them, they're very even on score. No more, no less.

  • Extraño tanto tu magia MAGO...

  • omg coria was such a great player on clay, if only his mind would have stayed sane a little bit more...for sure he would have won at least 1 RG

  • en este partido coria le paso la posta a nadal... desde ahi en adelante nadal se volvio el rey del polvo

  • This is it!

    The best clay final!

  • fisicamente rafa lo destrozo!!!

  • No me esperaba tan buena calidad para este partido

    gracias por subirlo

  • nadal, coria, kuerten, rios. en ese orden man. pero la magia de coria no se a visto jamas.

  • énorme nadal

  • federer is older than Nadal. they are not of the same generation.

    can you imagine a 28yo Nadal beating any 22 year old?????

  • @pmo1983 actually nadal is now 24 and federer just turned 29 - so federer is less than 5 years older than nadal.generally spoken you say your physical abillities peak in the age of 23 to 28. and nadal has beaten federer before he turned 23 so often. and yes, i can imagine a (not injured) 28 or 29 years old nadal beat some 22 years old guys. doesn't mean nadal's generally better than fed but the age (at least in this case) is no real argument

  • @pmo1983 yes i can imagine that

  • i fucking hate YouTube's new format

  • this match ruined corias career. if he had won this match hed still be a top player. but since he blew another big lead that f'd him up mentally and he never recovered. 05 us open was his last good tournament

  • Oh well, he's a fag anyway :D

  • i think that are a fan of coria, don't you?

    so kind words...

  • Personally I think he was better here than he is at the moment...

  • rafael nada PATHER

    roger federe SON

    eheheheeh

  • Erm.... folks, this video features Guillermo Coria and Rafael Nadal. Why is Roger Federer being debated here?

    Maybe I'm missing something.

  • Overall, Fed's better than Nadal. His game has got way more variety, he's more versatile, and he's wiser (e.g. looking after his body etc. so he can compete fully all season long). Nadal's still an insanely good player, one of the best ever (for sure, lol). But his H2H record against Fed isn't cos he's better, it's cos his game is simply so damn effective against Fed. Fed's basically got 1 weakness- high backhands. Nadal's game is designed around hitting high to the backhand!

  • Why doesn't Rafa hit his forehand with that much tenacity any more? I think he'd stand a better chance of winning the Open if he stuck to what he did best.

  • Exactly what I'm thinking... I love the guy but I don't get the same feeling watching him play anymore. Last year I thought no-one could beat him but now he doesn't seem to hit as many winners :\

  • ROGER FEDERER = ALMOST 28 YEARS OLD RAFAEL NADAL = 23 YEARS OLD ... :d when roger was rafa's age he only had 3 slams, and only on two surfaces, grass and hard. ... :d rafa has a career grand slam already... roger didn't get one until recently. ... :d head to head, roger and rafa: 13-7 for rafa ... :d clay: 9-2 for rafa ... :d
  • my mistake, not a career grand slam, i meant slams on all the surfaces

  • Look how Nadal looks now. I reckon Federer made him look like a vegetable.

    Federer: 28 years old, Nadal 23 years old.

    Federer: looks fit, Nadal: looks like an old granny.

    To be a shot above all, you have to be smart. Nuff said.

  • when you say "he looks like an old granny, do you mean that he can't move? because if you watch any of his matches, even when he's seriously injured, he is still moving better than a lot of pros.

    or do you mean that he just looks old and out of shape?... nadal can curl 66 pounds with his left arm, and about 57 with his right, do you realize how much weight that is?

  • Federer never MADE him look like a vegetable, Nadal kicked his ass every time. Nadal is just a hard worker, and there's a reason his body is breaking down on him now. That's because he started playing when he was 3, Federer was about 7 or 8 when he started.

    Also, Federer's a fag. He only acts nice when he wins, but when he loses he's a fucking crybaby brat. You only recognize him being nice because he wins all the time.

  • "You only recognize him being nice because he wins all the time. "

    Almost yes.

  • c'mon...everbody is nice when winning and a motherfucker when losing...it's natural we always wants to win!!!

  • @wisnerff Someone like Novak Djokovic (happens to be my favorite) gives fantastic sportsmanship even when loses, just as much as when he wins.

    Federer has to realize that he has enough, and he doesn't have to act like a total dick when he doesn't get EVERYTHING.

  • The only think i don't agree with Federer was when he throw the bottle of water... I have other thinks to say...but my english is to bad...

    What i can say is that I agreee with you in parts...

  • Watch Federer on David Letterman. He says he started playing when he was 2.

  • the forehand of nadal in incredible

  • Re: federer>nadal... Yeh thats why rafa is 13-6 against him (And lets not forget that a couple of those wins came when rafa was either dead tired or he was really inexperienced and low on confidence)

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more