@ssinghisking the answer to your point is that in virat yudh there was no obligations to oblige in kurukshetra the rules were laid down before the start of war...... secondly as described by teen baan dhaari he had stated that only shri krishna was fighting others were just means to his end.....
Whatever...We can see in the final combats in kurukshtera arjun was having hard time to single handedly disarm either Bhishm, Dronacharya or Karan....as we can c that he could disarm all of the three warriros with ease in Virat..
Although I know one can argue that he made all the warriors subconsious...but I think my point stands merit.....
@ssingisking inkurukshtera he was de moralised even before the war ...here in virat he was fieruious ..+the other warriors dint come to virat to fight arjun and were un prepared for him ....your point dose stand merit
If Arjun could alone defeat all the great Kuru Warriors in just half a day....Why did the actual Mahabharat war took 18 days and the deaths of so many of Pandav warriors??
Something wrong with the description of the Virat war...
@ssingisking Because it wasn't just the Hastinapur army that Arjun was facing. He was facing many many many other armies as well. Don't forget Balram and Rukhman were the only two people that were not involved in that war. Dwarka's army was the largest army out of all of them and they were on Duryodhan's side, except for Krishna.
7:04 ..WIERD THING IS DAT THE U.S HAS EXACTLY THESE KINDA MISSLES TODAY WHICH SPREAD LITTLE SKITTLES IN THE SKY BEFORE EXPLODING EVEN SMALLER SPLINTERS CAUSING A MASS DAMAGE TO THE TROOPS BELOW OVER A LARGE TRACT OF LAND.. WELL THE ONLY DIFFERNCE IS DAT THESE MISSILES ARENT HAND MOUNTED LIKE ARJUN'S SEEM TO BE .. THER IS NO SUCH THING AS COINCEDENCE .
@gaurav15984 with regards to cheating, Lord Krishna clearly states in the Mahabharata and in most Vedic literature that committing a sin for the purpose of Dharma is not a sin at all. For example, in this war of truth and untruth, great warriors like Bhishma and Karna could only be defeated through deception. Deception was a major factor because of the Kauravas use of deception in the past to defeat the Pandavas as well as the fact that this war could not be won fairly.
bhishmpitamah fight with arjun and not with Breainella because at that time arjun's 1 year of curse was completed and he was arjun at that time.only his dressed was not changed.......
@bipinjadav@iaarl Then how do you explain this - Karna had insulted his and Bishma's Teacher by insulting a woman so Bishma said he will not allow such a person to fight under his flag. Yet, Karna was present in this Virat war. How and Why?
@tycoonpratik It's very simple - Bhishma is not the senapati of this army. In fact this is a rag tag outfit under the leadership of Duryodhana. Finally, this altercation is not taking place under Bhishma's flag.
bhishmpitamah fight with arjun and not with Breainella because at that time arjun's 1 year of curse was completed and he was arjun at that time.only his dressed was not changed.......
@tycoonpratik shrikhandi was women by aatma and jeev, she was given a body of a male. whereas, arjun is a male by aatma and jeev and he was cursed to be brainella for one year only which was already completed
@iaarl Then how do you explain this - Karna had insulted his and Bishma's Teacher by insulting a woman so Bishma said he will not allow such a person to fight under his flag. Yet, Karna was present in this Virat war. How and Why?
@tycoonpratik I dont know if you have watched the other episodes- towards the end Bhishma himself tells Karna that he wanted to prevent him fight with his brothers and that he knew he was the eldest son of kunti. He used the insult as an excuse.
@r8rdarklord :- U knw why indra gave him permission to use vajra cause indra came as a begger(to save his son arjun) he asked for his Kawach and kundal because all DIVYASTRA aka Divine wepons were totally useless againt that kawach and kundal.. Karan Knew he is Lord indra still he donated the same even Indra was shocked Cld Him DANVEEER karna .. and yes if we indians talk about daan (Donation) 1st name is DANVEER KARNA.. arjun won cause he was having LORD on his side .. even Karna was aware:)
read wikipedia for details on final fight against arjuna and karna.. karna had almost killed arjuna the previous day, but krishna set the sun early so the fight discontinued. next day, karna'a Brahmastra failed to work coz of parshurama's curse. karna still had a very great chance to kill aarjuna...a deadly snake offered to sit on karna's arrows whose bite would've killed arjuna..but karna refused to take its help. also, krishna and hanuman's presence on arjuna's rath shielded him from his death
@redhotisroopak yeah but i think it is because of his good karma also. Arjun was destined to get all this protection. However he did not make use of any of his divya astras which would have given him a big advantage on karna
On his comment, Arjuna exclaimed that "while I hit Karna's chariot it moved feet behind so there is no reason to praise Karna on this". Krishna then explained to Arjuna that “On your chariot I, Lord Vishnu am present. I own the weight of entire universe and in addition to it your chariot is the chariot of Agni(the fire god) and it has the blessings of Hanuman in the form of a flag. If you remove these factors your chariot will fly away, revolving around the Earth".
@all :- KARNA was the best archer :-There are many incidents and quotes which indicate the might and greatness of Karna. One of those incidents is during Karna's war with Arjuna. When Arjuna's chariot was shifted a few inches back by the impact of one of the arrows shot by Karna, Krishna being Arjuna's Sarathi(charioteer) praised Karna.
@MrSexyboy12345 because karna is the son of kunti and surya dev and the brother of 5 pandus...so there is no different between them .... but arjun is the best
Took all of two days to kill Susharma, got killed by his own son Babruvahana, and came a cropper against ordinary thieves looting Dwaraka.
Using a divine weapon against a crop of warriors proves the power of the weapon, not Arjuna's valour. The warrior who accepted the so called "defeat" from Arjuna themselves had plenty of such divine weapons, which they refrained from using in that battle. Wonder what the consequences would have been, if they HAD used those weapons
Took all of two days to kill Susharma, got killed by his own son Babruvahana, and came a cropper against ordinary thieves looting Dwaraka.
Using a divine weapon against a crop of warriors proves the power of the weapon, not Arjuna's valour. The warrior who accepted the so called "defeat" from Arjuna themselves had plenty of such divine weapons, which they refrained from using in that battle. Wonder what the consequences would have been, if they HAD used those weapons.
@SamSungSamSung9999 Sorry buddy but Babruvahana was Arjuna's son. He didn't kill Arjuna. Arjuna departed to Himalayas with rest of the Pandavas. He defeated Karna in this battle without ever having to use divine weapons. If you read Mahabharat, it clearly depicts that all these warriors were going to attack together at Duryodhan's command and so Arjuna used Mohini to incapacitate them and finally, Susharma was never fighting with Arjuna staying at one place. He was straying Arjuna out of battle.
@deadman1061 , you certainly have a point there, so I agree with you to an extent. But:
(1) Bheeshma Drona, and Kripacharya were very old people, too, but young people were struggling to match them in battle, so not sure how important the age factor was.
(2) It is generally believed that people had a long life span in those days - how else do you explain Gandhari, Savitri etc. having a hundred children? That would also explain why Bheeshma et al. were still fighting fit despite their age.
@deadman1061, (3) Babruvahana has no intention of fighting Arjuna at all, knowing Arjuna was his own father. But Arjuna kept goading him, until he got somewhat serious, and to his horror, ended up KILLING Arjuna (all accounts I have read say that Arjuna was actually killed, and then restored to life by Princess Uloopi).
(4) Arjuna used Anjalikastra to kill Karna, and by all accounts, that was a formidable weapon.
@deadman1061, (5) Susharma - not sure. Maybe he WAS dodging Arjuna more than fighting him. Still, Arjuna ought to have made short work of him.
(6) Unlike the Ramayana war, where ALL divine weapons were used at the drop of a hat, the Mahabharatha war was fought largely AVOIDING weapons of mass destruction (WMDs?). Only weapons like Nagastra, Shakti, Anjalika etc., that only killed individuals, were used FREELY.
Still, you have valid points. I think it is a question of perception.
@SamSungSamSung9999 I don't think it's a question of perception. Karna himself used divine weapons to kill Ghatotkacha (he used his one chance to use the Vajra). If he was such a great warrior why couldn't he fight Ghatokacha one-on-one without divine weapons and beat him. Also, he tried to use Brahmastra on Arjun but it didn't come to him because of Parshuram's shrap. Also, Susharma's job was to run in a manner so that Arjun doesn't go near the Chakavyuh.
@SamSungSamSung9999 Susharma never tried to fight Arjun. He just wanted to dodge Arjun's attack and stray him away so he was merely trying to distract him. Wiki can't be fully trusted. King Babruvahan didn't kill Arjun but he merely made him unconscious like Lakshman. Already he was very very old by then. He fought Mahabharat at very old age so imagine his age when he fought Babruvahan?? Also, Arjun was alone in this war and all were attacking him from all the sides. So he had to subdue them.
@2810nirmit In this war, he only had to defeat them whereas in the Kurukshetra war he had to KILLED them (esp Bhishma and Dronacharya whom he revered like no one else did); which made his task much much more difficult as he !!!
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
It is silly to show Arjun beating all of them at once. In reality, in a fair fight, Karna is superior to Arjun (which is why Krishna had to do all sorts of things to disadvantage Karna).
@kmg4 Wow! you want to rewrite Mahabharata with your ideas of who is superior or who is inferior. There are other battles in which Karna lost to Arjuna, so how is he superior .
@r8rdarklord in virat yudh the war was incomplete and in case of gandharva war he was drunk so he went to fresh himself up and get his weapons. i think maharishi vedh vyash wasnted to fight over the topic of superiority
@pujasur09, agree with you. According to BR Chopra's Mahabharatha, Karna never fought the Gandharvas - Arjuna had already finished the job by the time he got over his intoxication and came out ready to battle. Also, the Virat yuddha doesn't prove anything other than the power of Sammohanastra.
Also, Duryodhana was not an idiot. He MUST have had proof - i.e., Karna fully matching Arjuna over a long-drawn battle/competition, most probably when Karna challenged Arjuna for the best archer title.
@r8rdarklord so u are telling us that arjun was even better than bheeshma....in the final battle why didn't he kill all these warriors fair and square ...why did he resort to cheating
@gaurav15984 Gaurav - what do you mean by fair and square. If you paid attention you will realize that Arjuna didn't kill Bhishma, he wounded him. He couldn't be killed by any human/god or even by himself unless certain conditions got satisfied. This is because he was wearing the iccha mrityu kavach - which he was bound to wear by oath. Hence, there couldn't be a fair fight with him.
@r8rdarklord buddy u got to be kidding me.............iccha mrityu was for death.............why couldn't arjun put bheeshma on the arrow bed without resorting to cheating...why didn't he wait for karna to get back on rath before killing him............thats because he couldn't do either of the two without cheating.....I am in no way saying that arjuna was not a great warrior but just that karan was as great as he was...............
@gaurav15984 - First off, you are contradicting yourself, you first said that Arjuna killed Bhishma to which I replied Arjun didn't kill Bhishma - neither Bhishma nor Drona could be killed in a battle. Now let's come to Karna, watch the sequence again Karna was an ati-rathi he could have instantiated another ratha. However, he didn't he went down to pull out the wheels from the ground.
@r8rdarklord BTW, Karna was dead anyway, because Lord SriKrishna was asking Arjuna to use the Brahmastra on Karna. Now lest you give the reason that it would be unfair of Arjuna to use the Brahmastra - this was after Karna had tried to use the Brahmastra and it didn't come to him because of Parshuram's curse.
agree up to some extent... Karna was great warrior..but probably not as great as Arjun..your "Karma" also play vital role..Karna was living in hatred his sole aim was to kill arjun...if u c..Krishna was worried only bcoz karna had brahmastra.. if he dint would Krishna still be worried? may b arjun cud hv defeated karna fair n square also..may b that wud hv taken long time noone knows th8.. There gotta b a reason y he was called "best archer".
@sharpguy2 karna may not have been better byut he certainly was not any less than arjun.................when u say arjun was best archer was he better than Bhisma or parshurama or even drona...........................he was just given this ttle by drona
@sharpguy23 Krishna was worried prior to Ghatotkacha's death. Why ? because Karna had gotten one use of vajra for the kundal and kavach. Since, he used the vajra on Ghatotkacha, Krishna knew that there was no divine weapon that could kill Arjuna.
@kmg4 - its not an exact measurement. Both r great warriors.The kavach n kundal meant he cud not be killed, did not mean he cud not be defeated. In actual story d gandharvas defeated karna and imprisoned Duryodhana
You should remember that when Urvarshi Cursed Arjuna of Impotence and of being a eunuch for a year, she told arjun that whenever after the period of one year he desires he can again attain his manhood and manly looks. These are not goofs but scenes shot with extreme care and after following right notes.
@9711ALI There are far more serious questions you should be asking if you are watching this. Such as :
Why could not Kunti merely take baby Karna to the river, bring him back, and say she found him. This frees her from shame, since Karna looks like he was 'found', but he still gets an upbringing in the palace with non-family status comparable to Vidura or Kripacharya.
@kmg4 Arjuna gave a more sophisticated answer but in summary it amounted to what you mentioned. Well! it is happening now as well - so why are we surprised. Many women marry people old enough to be there father or viceversa.
I am from Kirat tribe. The caste system was created by vedic Aryan especially Brahmins. In Rig Veda book, dating 2000BCE, it is mentioned that Kiratas fought against this system but Kiratas lost the war and so this system has been in existence since.
@diliprai Keep shouting Mr.Dilip. Not even a mad man will listen to you.. You never dared to answer the questions I raised in the comments section of the video 'Dwadasa Jyotirlinga Stothram', but keep shouting in every video possible.. keep doing this, nobody will ever pay a heed to your nonsense!
Yudhishtir has declared the true duty of life forgiveness is duty, forgiveness is the path and forgiveness is the ultimate reality, glory be to his teaching
@creatorsearch - Durin dat time when he gives up his thumb it was true, but Eklavya never mastered it fully (acquiring divyastras). archery is not just abt skill its also abt gaining those divine astras that make u invincible compared 2 ur enemies. None of the other warriors possessed Pashupatastra
no offence, i neither appreciate arjun or karna. i love the 16 year old warrior who was the son of arjun, student of lord krishna, who's name is "abhimanyu" he killed several warriors like Laxman, Shalya, Rukmaratha, Drighalochana, Kundavedhi, Sushena, Vasatiya, Kratha and numerous other great warriors. He wounded Karna and made him flee, making Dushshasana faint in the battlefield such that he had to be carried off by others.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
karna was the best.................with his kavach and kundal ,arjuna or any one else could not have defeated him............here arjun only could make him unconscious not kill him.......
He used divya astras in this war. In mahabharat he vowed not to use any divya astra. Thats why he is considered the greatest warrior of all times because he won the war of mahabharat without using his trump card by lowering himself to an even keel.
dude with his kavach and kundal.......no divya astra could have touched karna............also if arjuna was so strong than why didn't he wait for karna to get back on rath...............
Divya astras did "touch" karna in this war you can see. In mahabharat too arjun had broken all of karnas bows and other things and even rath before killing him. Karna could easily have called another rath as sri krishan said. He got down and started fiddling with his rath because he knew that if he remained on rath his death is waiting for him , so it was his strategy to just keep fiddling with the wheel of the rath. Having said that he is considered second only to arjun in the art of archery.
dude u seriously have no idea what you are talking about .................if arjun could have killed karna with his kavach and kundal then why did indra had to come all the way down just to beg in front of karan for kavach......................also who said that it ws karan's strategy to avoid death ............if that was so then why didn't he just tell arjun that he was his elder brother ..............truth is that karan was better than arjun .......watch episode 87, 88 and 89
Don't get me wrong he is one of the greatest i agree,but won't say better than Bhishm.U can see he is telling to Lord Shiva that only four can defeat him,Lord Shiva,Bheeshm,Dhron and Indra.
you have to ask that question to his sarathi "krishna". it was krishna who forced arjun to shoot the arrow which killed karna. lord indra took away karna's kavach and kundal in the name of donation
It appears that The greatest warrior, the son Ganges is just NOT using all the of his skill sets (archery) against the greatest warrior, The supreme Arjun, favored by Dharma and Lord Kishna.
Oh sinless Arjun! May you, your deeds, your bravery and courage live in the hearts of eacn and everyone. There is a lot to learn from you by studying you and admiring the great feats you achieved. I hope that one day you will be reborn and bring peace. Love you laddie, love you. HAIL ARJUN
If that is what you think then I respect your comment but for me he is an ultimate genious. Please read the "Holy Geeta", once in Sanskrit and once in English and hope that you will understand my over the top comment.
I have read the "Gita" and "Mahabharat". But may be I don't have the same level of adulation for him.
Infact Gita signifies the essence and deeds of Krishna. So I am not sure, why Gita would give me more insight into Arjun, except that he was a good listener and posed some really good questions. But the values you mention -- bravery and courage -- atleast in the Gita are exemplified by Krishna!!
Well, I am sure for a pseudo intellectual, reading Mahabharat would equate to understanding the Gita. So from your stand point, one should rather buy the Mahabharat even if his intention is to read the Gita, for better value of money.
-Geeta is not doubt an independent subject of study. Ab beautiful (I dont wanna use word philosophy but I dont find better word) philosophy itself. Good insight into the life. But when you are trying to interpret Arjun you cannot take Geeta out of the context of Mahabharat and evaluate him.
-Philosophical part yes, its eternal , timeless, ageless but characters should be evaluated by not taking geeta out of the context of Mahabharata.
If you look at the original comment, he was using the Gita as a reference to Arjuna's valor. Which, is what I commented, that Gita alone does not do much for Arjun.
It is so good to see how a Champion Warrior comes back with a loud bang after a long period of time and decimates his formidable adversaries like a wave of Tsunami.
Hail Arjuna!! One of the Greatest warriors of India.He was the one chosen by almighty Lord Krishna himself,inorder to lead the fight for the 'Dharma'(righteousness)on the Battlefield of Kurukshetra.
The Battle of Virat which is shown in the video was just the dress rehearsal of the Great War of Mahabharat that was going to take place in Kurukshetra.
Karna gets his behinds kicked in battle against Arjuna.
r8rdarklord 1 month ago
They show Balram to be so dumb. Or easy to be brainwashed.
jiggie181 1 month ago
@ssinghisking the answer to your point is that in virat yudh there was no obligations to oblige in kurukshetra the rules were laid down before the start of war...... secondly as described by teen baan dhaari he had stated that only shri krishna was fighting others were just means to his end.....
29anubhav 1 month ago
So Arjun is OK with killing Hastinapur soldiers. There are still the soldiers of his own kingdom.
kmg4 2 months ago
Whatever...We can see in the final combats in kurukshtera arjun was having hard time to single handedly disarm either Bhishm, Dronacharya or Karan....as we can c that he could disarm all of the three warriros with ease in Virat..
Although I know one can argue that he made all the warriors subconsious...but I think my point stands merit.....
ssingisking 2 months ago
@ssingisking HE made use of some of his divya astras in virat but did not use any during kurukshetra war.
iaarl 2 months ago
@ssingisking inkurukshtera he was de moralised even before the war ...here in virat he was fieruious ..+the other warriors dint come to virat to fight arjun and were un prepared for him ....your point dose stand merit
balieshwar999999999 3 weeks ago
If Arjun could alone defeat all the great Kuru Warriors in just half a day....Why did the actual Mahabharat war took 18 days and the deaths of so many of Pandav warriors??
Something wrong with the description of the Virat war...
ssingisking 3 months ago
@ssingisking Because it wasn't just the Hastinapur army that Arjun was facing. He was facing many many many other armies as well. Don't forget Balram and Rukhman were the only two people that were not involved in that war. Dwarka's army was the largest army out of all of them and they were on Duryodhan's side, except for Krishna.
jiggie181 2 months ago
@ssingisking Because Mahabharat was fought between two huge armies, there were many other great warriors who took part in that war.
r8rdarklord 1 month ago
wah....wah yudhistirr wah....kya dialogue cheppa hai...kya mast...rappchikk dharamguru hai re bidu....aaj k yug k sab saale dhongi !!!
taurasicon1 4 months ago
karna....karna....karna....karna....abey ghanta karna...60 episode dekh liye ab tak bolbachhan hi karta rha....
either d picturization of karna is nt upto d mark of his character....or dre's sth wrong with B.R. chopra's mahabharat !!!
taurasicon1 4 months ago 2
how come arjun grew hismustache in one day
masterblasterr1 5 months ago 5
@masterblasterr1 bhai....make up yaar....make up se he had actually hidden it !!!
taurasicon1 4 months ago 2
@masterblasterr1 That is quite funny.
jiggie181 1 month ago
LOOOL I KNOW this luks completely out of cartoon but some how..... THIS IS AWESOME !!!!! LOLOL
Pfire1 6 months ago
A little to cheesy for my taste :P
ee07b067 6 months ago
lol this is so corny
llVIU 7 months ago
7:04 ..WIERD THING IS DAT THE U.S HAS EXACTLY THESE KINDA MISSLES TODAY WHICH SPREAD LITTLE SKITTLES IN THE SKY BEFORE EXPLODING EVEN SMALLER SPLINTERS CAUSING A MASS DAMAGE TO THE TROOPS BELOW OVER A LARGE TRACT OF LAND.. WELL THE ONLY DIFFERNCE IS DAT THESE MISSILES ARENT HAND MOUNTED LIKE ARJUN'S SEEM TO BE .. THER IS NO SUCH THING AS COINCEDENCE .
REXXBAILEY 8 months ago 2
ARJUN= GREATEST OF ALL TIME
jlunightwing 8 months ago
"BHAAAG MATT KAYYARRRR!!!!!!! BHAAG MATT!! YE ARJUNN KA GANDIVAAA HAIIII!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
MukeshPandya1985 8 months ago 3
I like Puneet Issar's acting.
rne18145 8 months ago 3
every sentence is so filled with wisdom in entire mahabharat and geeta..saadar namaskar to krishn and krishn(arjun)
0nman 9 months ago 7
putr paraya dhan hoti hai to kya kisi ki bhi jholi me daal de?...waah...what a great respect for women..contrast to what happened in hastinapur...
0nman 9 months ago 2
@gaurav15984 with regards to cheating, Lord Krishna clearly states in the Mahabharata and in most Vedic literature that committing a sin for the purpose of Dharma is not a sin at all. For example, in this war of truth and untruth, great warriors like Bhishma and Karna could only be defeated through deception. Deception was a major factor because of the Kauravas use of deception in the past to defeat the Pandavas as well as the fact that this war could not be won fairly.
tubbyloco 10 months ago
dont give any advertisement before any vedios.......
gaurav8182 11 months ago
Love Krishna and Arjun!! <3 :D
krishnabansi 1 year ago
WHY DID BISHMA FIGHT BRAINELLA BUT NOT SHIKANDI?
.. CAN ANYBODY ANSWER? .... STILL????
PARSHURAM MADE HIS STUDENTS VOW NOT TO FIGHT WITH WOMEN SO WHAT DID WE JUST SEE? BRAINELLA WAS AN ENUCH JUST LIKE SHIKANDI RIGHT?
tycoonpratik 1 year ago
@tycoonpratik
bhishmpitamah fight with arjun and not with Breainella because at that time arjun's 1 year of curse was completed and he was arjun at that time.only his dressed was not changed.......
bipinjadav 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@bipinjadav @iaarl Then how do you explain this - Karna had insulted his and Bishma's Teacher by insulting a woman so Bishma said he will not allow such a person to fight under his flag. Yet, Karna was present in this Virat war. How and Why?
tycoonpratik 10 months ago
@tycoonpratik It's very simple - Bhishma is not the senapati of this army. In fact this is a rag tag outfit under the leadership of Duryodhana. Finally, this altercation is not taking place under Bhishma's flag.
r8rdarklord 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bhishmpitamah fight with arjun and not with Breainella because at that time arjun's 1 year of curse was completed and he was arjun at that time.only his dressed was not changed.......
bipinjadav 1 year ago
@tycoonpratik shrikhandi was women by aatma and jeev, she was given a body of a male. whereas, arjun is a male by aatma and jeev and he was cursed to be brainella for one year only which was already completed
debo325 1 year ago
@tycoonpratik No Shikandi was an Enuch + he was a woman in his previous birth
iaarl 10 months ago
@iaarl Then how do you explain this - Karna had insulted his and Bishma's Teacher by insulting a woman so Bishma said he will not allow such a person to fight under his flag. Yet, Karna was present in this Virat war. How and Why?
tycoonpratik 10 months ago
@tycoonpratik I dont know if you have watched the other episodes- towards the end Bhishma himself tells Karna that he wanted to prevent him fight with his brothers and that he knew he was the eldest son of kunti. He used the insult as an excuse.
iaarl 10 months ago
Arjun is a perfect blend of great archery and respect for his Teacher and Elders, thats why he is ranked above Eklavya & Karna.
111brand 1 year ago
@r8rdarklord :- U knw why indra gave him permission to use vajra cause indra came as a begger(to save his son arjun) he asked for his Kawach and kundal because all DIVYASTRA aka Divine wepons were totally useless againt that kawach and kundal.. Karan Knew he is Lord indra still he donated the same even Indra was shocked Cld Him DANVEEER karna .. and yes if we indians talk about daan (Donation) 1st name is DANVEER KARNA.. arjun won cause he was having LORD on his side .. even Karna was aware:)
MrSexyboy12345 1 year ago
read wikipedia for details on final fight against arjuna and karna.. karna had almost killed arjuna the previous day, but krishna set the sun early so the fight discontinued. next day, karna'a Brahmastra failed to work coz of parshurama's curse. karna still had a very great chance to kill aarjuna...a deadly snake offered to sit on karna's arrows whose bite would've killed arjuna..but karna refused to take its help. also, krishna and hanuman's presence on arjuna's rath shielded him from his death
redhotisroopak 1 year ago
@redhotisroopak yeah but i think it is because of his good karma also. Arjun was destined to get all this protection. However he did not make use of any of his divya astras which would have given him a big advantage on karna
iaarl 10 months ago
no it cann't be said that arjun is greater then karna.
roshantentha 1 year ago
On his comment, Arjuna exclaimed that "while I hit Karna's chariot it moved feet behind so there is no reason to praise Karna on this". Krishna then explained to Arjuna that “On your chariot I, Lord Vishnu am present. I own the weight of entire universe and in addition to it your chariot is the chariot of Agni(the fire god) and it has the blessings of Hanuman in the form of a flag. If you remove these factors your chariot will fly away, revolving around the Earth".
MrSexyboy12345 1 year ago
@all :- KARNA was the best archer :-There are many incidents and quotes which indicate the might and greatness of Karna. One of those incidents is during Karna's war with Arjuna. When Arjuna's chariot was shifted a few inches back by the impact of one of the arrows shot by Karna, Krishna being Arjuna's Sarathi(charioteer) praised Karna.
MrSexyboy12345 1 year ago
@MrSexyboy12345 because karna is the son of kunti and surya dev and the brother of 5 pandus...so there is no different between them .... but arjun is the best
SuperUnique11 1 year ago
@all :-- Arjuna won cause he was having Lord Krishna on his side if u Knw .Karna was far better then arjun he was the best ...
MrSexyboy12345 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Nice stout girls finding romance online naneedj.info
hiedipaola 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Some Warrior, Arjuna.
Took all of two days to kill Susharma, got killed by his own son Babruvahana, and came a cropper against ordinary thieves looting Dwaraka.
Using a divine weapon against a crop of warriors proves the power of the weapon, not Arjuna's valour. The warrior who accepted the so called "defeat" from Arjuna themselves had plenty of such divine weapons, which they refrained from using in that battle. Wonder what the consequences would have been, if they HAD used those weapons
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
Some Warrior, Arjuna.
Took all of two days to kill Susharma, got killed by his own son Babruvahana, and came a cropper against ordinary thieves looting Dwaraka.
Using a divine weapon against a crop of warriors proves the power of the weapon, not Arjuna's valour. The warrior who accepted the so called "defeat" from Arjuna themselves had plenty of such divine weapons, which they refrained from using in that battle. Wonder what the consequences would have been, if they HAD used those weapons.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
@SamSungSamSung9999 Sorry buddy but Babruvahana was Arjuna's son. He didn't kill Arjuna. Arjuna departed to Himalayas with rest of the Pandavas. He defeated Karna in this battle without ever having to use divine weapons. If you read Mahabharat, it clearly depicts that all these warriors were going to attack together at Duryodhan's command and so Arjuna used Mohini to incapacitate them and finally, Susharma was never fighting with Arjuna staying at one place. He was straying Arjuna out of battle.
deadman1061 1 year ago
@deadman1061 , you certainly have a point there, so I agree with you to an extent. But:
(1) Bheeshma Drona, and Kripacharya were very old people, too, but young people were struggling to match them in battle, so not sure how important the age factor was.
(2) It is generally believed that people had a long life span in those days - how else do you explain Gandhari, Savitri etc. having a hundred children? That would also explain why Bheeshma et al. were still fighting fit despite their age.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
@deadman1061, (3) Babruvahana has no intention of fighting Arjuna at all, knowing Arjuna was his own father. But Arjuna kept goading him, until he got somewhat serious, and to his horror, ended up KILLING Arjuna (all accounts I have read say that Arjuna was actually killed, and then restored to life by Princess Uloopi).
(4) Arjuna used Anjalikastra to kill Karna, and by all accounts, that was a formidable weapon.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
@deadman1061, (5) Susharma - not sure. Maybe he WAS dodging Arjuna more than fighting him. Still, Arjuna ought to have made short work of him.
(6) Unlike the Ramayana war, where ALL divine weapons were used at the drop of a hat, the Mahabharatha war was fought largely AVOIDING weapons of mass destruction (WMDs?). Only weapons like Nagastra, Shakti, Anjalika etc., that only killed individuals, were used FREELY.
Still, you have valid points. I think it is a question of perception.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
@SamSungSamSung9999 I don't think it's a question of perception. Karna himself used divine weapons to kill Ghatotkacha (he used his one chance to use the Vajra). If he was such a great warrior why couldn't he fight Ghatokacha one-on-one without divine weapons and beat him. Also, he tried to use Brahmastra on Arjun but it didn't come to him because of Parshuram's shrap. Also, Susharma's job was to run in a manner so that Arjun doesn't go near the Chakavyuh.
r8rdarklord 1 year ago
@SamSungSamSung9999 Susharma never tried to fight Arjun. He just wanted to dodge Arjun's attack and stray him away so he was merely trying to distract him. Wiki can't be fully trusted. King Babruvahan didn't kill Arjun but he merely made him unconscious like Lakshman. Already he was very very old by then. He fought Mahabharat at very old age so imagine his age when he fought Babruvahan?? Also, Arjun was alone in this war and all were attacking him from all the sides. So he had to subdue them.
deadman1061 1 year ago
So it is MahaBharat.. epics of Epics !
wwinds 1 year ago
why did arjuna didnt hesitate to fight now....n hesitated in d main mahabharata war...
2810nirmit 1 year ago
@2810nirmit In this war, he only had to defeat them whereas in the Kurukshetra war he had to KILLED them (esp Bhishma and Dronacharya whom he revered like no one else did); which made his task much much more difficult as he !!!
artist1402 1 year ago
Can someone explain why Arjun looks like a woman now?
Biacara1966 1 year ago
@Biacara1966 Bcz there was a curse on him and he used this curse to stay hidden during the last year of their exile.
vishalleekha 1 year ago
WHAT THE 11.7 ANUPA
ranbeer1234 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dear Blessed Soul, Please listen to Yatharth Geeta OR Bhagavad Gita, never has Bhagavad Gita been explained so clearly and in so much in depth. It is hence called "Yatharthgeeta, you can download the mp3 of your choice of language from the website yatharthgeeta. com OR search for 'yatharthgeeta' right here on youtube OR go to youtube. com/user/foryatharthgeeta to get a quick preview. God Bless You!
foryatharthgeeta 1 year ago
big fan of thiz indian movie!!!!!!!!!!
angelnicegrl 1 year ago
Karna was not superior to Arjuna. he was just a gifted warrior due to blessings of his father Surya. So Arjuna beating him is very much natural.
sambit37 1 year ago
@sambit37 karna was better than arjuna......watch the full series...or read the book...u will know why
gaurav15984 1 year ago
It is silly to show Arjun beating all of them at once. In reality, in a fair fight, Karna is superior to Arjun (which is why Krishna had to do all sorts of things to disadvantage Karna).
kmg4 1 year ago
@kmg4 Wow! you want to rewrite Mahabharata with your ideas of who is superior or who is inferior. There are other battles in which Karna lost to Arjuna, so how is he superior .
r8rdarklord 1 year ago
@r8rdarklord in virat yudh the war was incomplete and in case of gandharva war he was drunk so he went to fresh himself up and get his weapons. i think maharishi vedh vyash wasnted to fight over the topic of superiority
pujasur09 1 year ago
@pujasur09, agree with you. According to BR Chopra's Mahabharatha, Karna never fought the Gandharvas - Arjuna had already finished the job by the time he got over his intoxication and came out ready to battle. Also, the Virat yuddha doesn't prove anything other than the power of Sammohanastra.
Also, Duryodhana was not an idiot. He MUST have had proof - i.e., Karna fully matching Arjuna over a long-drawn battle/competition, most probably when Karna challenged Arjuna for the best archer title.
SamSungSamSung9999 1 year ago
@r8rdarklord so u are telling us that arjun was even better than bheeshma....in the final battle why didn't he kill all these warriors fair and square ...why did he resort to cheating
gaurav15984 1 year ago
@gaurav15984 Gaurav - what do you mean by fair and square. If you paid attention you will realize that Arjuna didn't kill Bhishma, he wounded him. He couldn't be killed by any human/god or even by himself unless certain conditions got satisfied. This is because he was wearing the iccha mrityu kavach - which he was bound to wear by oath. Hence, there couldn't be a fair fight with him.
r8rdarklord 1 year ago
@r8rdarklord buddy u got to be kidding me.............iccha mrityu was for death.............why couldn't arjun put bheeshma on the arrow bed without resorting to cheating...why didn't he wait for karna to get back on rath before killing him............thats because he couldn't do either of the two without cheating.....I am in no way saying that arjuna was not a great warrior but just that karan was as great as he was...............
gaurav15984 1 year ago
@gaurav15984 - First off, you are contradicting yourself, you first said that Arjuna killed Bhishma to which I replied Arjun didn't kill Bhishma - neither Bhishma nor Drona could be killed in a battle. Now let's come to Karna, watch the sequence again Karna was an ati-rathi he could have instantiated another ratha. However, he didn't he went down to pull out the wheels from the ground.
r8rdarklord 1 year ago
@r8rdarklord BTW, Karna was dead anyway, because Lord SriKrishna was asking Arjuna to use the Brahmastra on Karna. Now lest you give the reason that it would be unfair of Arjuna to use the Brahmastra - this was after Karna had tried to use the Brahmastra and it didn't come to him because of Parshuram's curse.
r8rdarklord 1 year ago
agree up to some extent... Karna was great warrior..but probably not as great as Arjun..your "Karma" also play vital role..Karna was living in hatred his sole aim was to kill arjun...if u c..Krishna was worried only bcoz karna had brahmastra.. if he dint would Krishna still be worried? may b arjun cud hv defeated karna fair n square also..may b that wud hv taken long time noone knows th8.. There gotta b a reason y he was called "best archer".
sharpguy23 1 year ago
@sharpguy2 karna may not have been better byut he certainly was not any less than arjun.................when u say arjun was best archer was he better than Bhisma or parshurama or even drona...........................he was just given this ttle by drona
gaurav15984 1 year ago
@sharpguy23 Krishna was worried prior to Ghatotkacha's death. Why ? because Karna had gotten one use of vajra for the kundal and kavach. Since, he used the vajra on Ghatotkacha, Krishna knew that there was no divine weapon that could kill Arjuna.
r8rdarklord 1 year ago
@kmg4 Karna in no way was superior to Arjuna.He was blessed with powers of Surya and for the very reason lord Krishna had to plan such things.
sambit37 1 year ago
@kmg4 - its not an exact measurement. Both r great warriors.The kavach n kundal meant he cud not be killed, did not mean he cud not be defeated. In actual story d gandharvas defeated karna and imprisoned Duryodhana
viveksruparel 1 year ago
@viveksruparel he was inpenetrable so the video some how is wrong
pujasur09 1 year ago
How does arjun's mustache grow in 1 day???
aadiiitya 1 year ago
@aadiiitya The same way Hamuman's tail is not moveable by Bhima, and how Krishna is able to produce a chakra.
kmg4 1 year ago
@aadiiitya One of the Brahmastras that Arjun has grows mustaches.
kmg4 1 year ago
@aadiiitya
You should remember that when Urvarshi Cursed Arjuna of Impotence and of being a eunuch for a year, she told arjun that whenever after the period of one year he desires he can again attain his manhood and manly looks. These are not goofs but scenes shot with extreme care and after following right notes.
parishkar 1 year ago
pure awesomeness, i missed these epic bow-to-bow action, i like how it still looks so cool to me!
NickCheduoRebel 1 year ago
how arjun got wiskers in 1 night
9711ALI 1 year ago
@9711ALI There are far more serious questions you should be asking if you are watching this. Such as :
Why could not Kunti merely take baby Karna to the river, bring him back, and say she found him. This frees her from shame, since Karna looks like he was 'found', but he still gets an upbringing in the palace with non-family status comparable to Vidura or Kripacharya.
kmg4 1 year ago
@kmg4 it is the story wich is designed by shree krishna himself for whe people for the knowledge of kaliyuga ....k
9711ALI 1 year ago
so only Arjun had the divya aastras, none other had tham ?? even in the main war only he possesed them ? although he did not use any? am i correct ?
yognewchap 1 year ago
@yognewchap No others had it as well.
r8rdarklord 1 year ago
@r8rdarklord Wait, so the king wanted Uttara to marry Arjun, and then Arjun instead said that marrying Abhimanyu is better?
Shame on the king, giving his daughter to a man old enough to be her father.
kmg4 1 year ago
@kmg4 Arjuna gave a more sophisticated answer but in summary it amounted to what you mentioned. Well! it is happening now as well - so why are we surprised. Many women marry people old enough to be there father or viceversa.
r8rdarklord 1 year ago
I am from Kirat tribe. The caste system was created by vedic Aryan especially Brahmins. In Rig Veda book, dating 2000BCE, it is mentioned that Kiratas fought against this system but Kiratas lost the war and so this system has been in existence since.
Mail me if you want to know more.
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai yo randi jaa pani cha
TheTearsofheaven 1 year ago
@TheTearsofheaven Nepali King Yalambar was killed by Krishna. why are you supporting these Indians?
diliprai 1 year ago
@diliprai Keep shouting Mr.Dilip. Not even a mad man will listen to you.. You never dared to answer the questions I raised in the comments section of the video 'Dwadasa Jyotirlinga Stothram', but keep shouting in every video possible.. keep doing this, nobody will ever pay a heed to your nonsense!
Vedaseternal 1 year ago
this is one of the best episodes that b r chopra has made thanks for uploading
hotandse 1 year ago
Yudhishtir has declared the true duty of life forgiveness is duty, forgiveness is the path and forgiveness is the ultimate reality, glory be to his teaching
Hitsytube80 1 year ago
Awesomeness *bows down* And this is why Arjuna is known as the greatest warrier ever!!!
anhta1609 2 years ago 16
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@anhta1609, Eklovya is the real worrier over Arjun. Arjun is just DUST in front of him.
creatorsearch 1 year ago
@creatorsearch - Durin dat time when he gives up his thumb it was true, but Eklavya never mastered it fully (acquiring divyastras). archery is not just abt skill its also abt gaining those divine astras that make u invincible compared 2 ur enemies. None of the other warriors possessed Pashupatastra
viveksruparel 1 year ago
Arjun... truly the greatest warrier
netajismart 2 years ago 4
@netajismart karan the greates
gaurav15984 1 year ago
@gaurav15984 Why do you think I should believe you that Karna was the greatest warrior???
netajismart 1 year ago
Comment removed
snoopblunt 2 years ago
Comment removed
snoopblunt 2 years ago
Comment removed
snoopblunt 2 years ago
Mahabharat is great .
k1a2k3a 2 years ago 3
When u bless a lady in sanskrit, it is always "Ayushmati Bhava" Not "Ayushman bhava".
rsridhar 2 years ago 3
Bhull gayaa chamma karro sanskrit teacher ji .Lolz.....
jeet027 2 years ago
and it is kshama not chamma. hope you learn that also.
illopos 2 years ago 10
Bhisham Pitamah vadh
pramodbindal 2 years ago
Comment removed
Falgun1000 2 years ago
no offence, i neither appreciate arjun or karna. i love the 16 year old warrior who was the son of arjun, student of lord krishna, who's name is "abhimanyu" he killed several warriors like Laxman, Shalya, Rukmaratha, Drighalochana, Kundavedhi, Sushena, Vasatiya, Kratha and numerous other great warriors. He wounded Karna and made him flee, making Dushshasana faint in the battlefield such that he had to be carried off by others.
utubekhiladi 2 years ago 2
karna is just gudd in oll dezz bt arjun is mor clever
sophiyathiyam 2 years ago 3
This comment has received too many negative votes show
arjun is not clever he just had krishan on his side
munish16 2 years ago
Comment removed
jeet027 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
karna was the best.................with his kavach and kundal ,arjuna or any one else could not have defeated him............here arjun only could make him unconscious not kill him.......
gaurav15984 2 years ago
He used divya astras in this war. In mahabharat he vowed not to use any divya astra. Thats why he is considered the greatest warrior of all times because he won the war of mahabharat without using his trump card by lowering himself to an even keel.
lethalvipin 2 years ago 4
dude with his kavach and kundal.......no divya astra could have touched karna............also if arjuna was so strong than why didn't he wait for karna to get back on rath...............
gaurav15984 2 years ago
Divya astras did "touch" karna in this war you can see. In mahabharat too arjun had broken all of karnas bows and other things and even rath before killing him. Karna could easily have called another rath as sri krishan said. He got down and started fiddling with his rath because he knew that if he remained on rath his death is waiting for him , so it was his strategy to just keep fiddling with the wheel of the rath. Having said that he is considered second only to arjun in the art of archery.
lethalvipin 2 years ago 4
This has been flagged as spam show
dude u seriously have no idea what you are talking about .................if arjun could have killed karna with his kavach and kundal then why did indra had to come all the way down just to beg in front of karan for kavach......................also who said that it ws karan's strategy to avoid death ............if that was so then why didn't he just tell arjun that he was his elder brother ..............truth is that karan was better than arjun .......watch episode 87, 88 and 89
gaurav15984 2 years ago
Comment removed
gaurikripa 2 years ago
Don't get me wrong he is one of the greatest i agree,but won't say better than Bhishm.U can see he is telling to Lord Shiva that only four can defeat him,Lord Shiva,Bheeshm,Dhron and Indra.
gaurikripa 2 years ago
@gaurikripa - actually it shud b Parshuram not Indra.
When he received d Gandeeva from Agni dev he fought Indra and defeated Devraj
viveksruparel 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
War is not a video game. One cannot get another rath as soon as the first one is broken.
illopos 2 years ago
@lethalvipin - That rath was a gift from Bhagwaan Parshuram 2 Karna.so no chance of him leaving d rath
viveksruparel 1 year ago
you have to ask that question to his sarathi "krishna". it was krishna who forced arjun to shoot the arrow which killed karna. lord indra took away karna's kavach and kundal in the name of donation
utubekhiladi 2 years ago 3
@utubekhiladi Indra also gave him permission to use Vajra once.
r8rdarklord 1 year ago
@lethalvipin dear hu used divya astras correct your gyan before you comment
pujasur09 1 year ago
It appears that The greatest warrior, the son Ganges is just NOT using all the of his skill sets (archery) against the greatest warrior, The supreme Arjun, favored by Dharma and Lord Kishna.
sangrila007 2 years ago
This episode gives me goose bump. one man against an army of the finest and he still follows the rules!!
itsmeeeeeeeeeee 2 years ago 2
This is proof Arjun might be more advanced in archery than Karna.
1ntellectualSuperior 2 years ago 10
Mahabharat teaches us a lot of things-
1. Do not blindly love your child - Duryodhan was loved and pampered by his father blindly.
2. Not to be too proud
3. Always take the side of truth
oline123456789 3 years ago 9
Oh sinless Arjun! May you, your deeds, your bravery and courage live in the hearts of eacn and everyone. There is a lot to learn from you by studying you and admiring the great feats you achieved. I hope that one day you will be reborn and bring peace. Love you laddie, love you. HAIL ARJUN
dhrishikesh 3 years ago 13
I must say this comment is a bit corny :-)
mxmsk 3 years ago
Dear mxmsk, what do you exactly mean by, "a bit corny :-)"?
dhrishikesh 3 years ago
Just a bit "over the Top"
mxmsk 3 years ago 3
If that is what you think then I respect your comment but for me he is an ultimate genious. Please read the "Holy Geeta", once in Sanskrit and once in English and hope that you will understand my over the top comment.
dhrishikesh 3 years ago
I have read the "Gita" and "Mahabharat". But may be I don't have the same level of adulation for him.
Infact Gita signifies the essence and deeds of Krishna. So I am not sure, why Gita would give me more insight into Arjun, except that he was a good listener and posed some really good questions. But the values you mention -- bravery and courage -- atleast in the Gita are exemplified by Krishna!!
mxmsk 3 years ago 3
"I have read the "Gita" and "Mahabharat"." ROFL ROFL.
Gita is a part of Mahabharat.
yogeshwaryogeshwaryo 2 years ago
Well, I am sure for a pseudo intellectual, reading Mahabharat would equate to understanding the Gita. So from your stand point, one should rather buy the Mahabharat even if his intention is to read the Gita, for better value of money.
Really bright!!!!
mxmsk 2 years ago
-Hahaha, Chill dude, I was not slandering you. ;)
-Geeta is not doubt an independent subject of study. Ab beautiful (I dont wanna use word philosophy but I dont find better word) philosophy itself. Good insight into the life. But when you are trying to interpret Arjun you cannot take Geeta out of the context of Mahabharat and evaluate him.
-Philosophical part yes, its eternal , timeless, ageless but characters should be evaluated by not taking geeta out of the context of Mahabharata.
yogeshwaryogeshwaryo 2 years ago
If you look at the original comment, he was using the Gita as a reference to Arjuna's valor. Which, is what I commented, that Gita alone does not do much for Arjun.
Hence, my comment about Gita alone.
mxmsk 2 years ago
chandra ki Saugand, yadi yeh baat tumne surya uday ke pashcatt kahi hoti to tum ek aur shabdh lene ke liye jeevet nahi rehte !
indianpatriot 3 years ago 5
chemical warfare..wow mahabharat was in advance
inforde 3 years ago 7
Thanx...!
nitinzuverlassig 3 years ago 7
br chopra deserves all the credit 4 making this serial as if we are seeing the real MAHABHARATA
27rajesh 3 years ago 24
It is so good to see how a Champion Warrior comes back with a loud bang after a long period of time and decimates his formidable adversaries like a wave of Tsunami.
NEELABHINDIAN 3 years ago 43
Hail Arjuna!! One of the Greatest warriors of India.He was the one chosen by almighty Lord Krishna himself,inorder to lead the fight for the 'Dharma'(righteousness)on the Battlefield of Kurukshetra.
The Battle of Virat which is shown in the video was just the dress rehearsal of the Great War of Mahabharat that was going to take place in Kurukshetra.
NEELABHINDIAN 3 years ago 23
love this part...awesome...thanks for uploading this episode
praj43 3 years ago 15
hats off to arjuna....bravely ,a class apart¦
sadadosa85 3 years ago 36
thank a million for posting the videos ..everyday I wait for nw vidoes
pallavid 3 years ago 11
ARJUNA A GREAT WARRIOR
loving22soul 3 years ago 11