Formula 1 drivers have the biggest balls! Formula 1 cars will always win in any types of races, Even at Long straights, don't forget the DRS from the cars from 2011 season. You might be considering DRS is cheating, but think of it that way, with F1 cars, you can do anything to improve its performance just like the blown diffusers... you won't get awesome smart upgrades in dumb lousy motorbikes...
I hate débate over cars VS bike.. I own both.evo8 & ducati hypermotard.. Love them,need them.. On the road.. When I'm driving,wish i ride my bike,cause traffic jam,parking lots full,etc.. When i ride,wish i drove,cause its raining.. & yeah,true biker never,won't claim motogp is faster than F1.. Yeah u need balls to ride a bike.. I dare going fast on my evo,then my hyper.. But fun its always will be bike..
if they see this video the F1 dont destroy the bike in acceleration (in line). F1 distance only when the bike slows down to the corner (where the car has much more advantage, especially in wet conditions).
peace !
now i let you some accelerations of F1, MotoGP and Bugatti vs S1000RR
F1 accelerations 0-100 kmh 1.7 s 0-200 kmh 3.8 s 0-300 kmh 8.6 s * Every F1 car on the grid is capable of going from 0 to 160 kmh and back to 0 in less than 5 secs. * Figures are heavily dependent on gearing and aerodynamic setup. Moto GP accelarations 0-100 kmh 1.9 s 0-200 kmh 4.8 s 0-300 kmh 10.6 * s * Figures are heavily dependent on ratio gearbox setup. Now: Bugatti Veyron.0-100 kmh in 2.7s Approx. 200 and 300 kmh in 7.3s. and 16.7s BMW S1000RR 0-100 kmh 2.9 s 0-200kmh 7 s 0-299 kmh 17.6 s
@bruninja dumbass lol your facts are wrong a BMW S100RR is quicker in every way then a veryon ...it doesnt take7second for a veyron to do 186mph it takes 10.10 second for it to run down the 1/4mile at high 130s and it takes a BMW S1000RR 9.53S at 156mph true f1 cars are some what quicker then moto gp bike in acceleration but not at low speeds-mid to high a f1 willl win but as fars street legal bikes vs cars A S1000RR WILL KILL ANY PRODUCATION CAR in acceleration. stop making up shit!!
@barcode0954 well i think you dont read what i really write!! i wrote veyron takes "..200 and 300 kmh in 7.3s. and 16.7s" so i mean it takes from 0 to 200km/h 7.3sec. and from 0- 300km/h 16.7sec. ! i know what i write and what i know.. its not my imagination..
@Kororock , HI, You can not compare an F1 with a bike. are two different worlds! I can say is that the F1 brake later(stronger) than a bike,curve better,faster than everything. this is to the greater surface contact with the ground and the wings that produce much downforce! F1 is the pinnacle of four wheels! but in-line acceleration is more or less identical to a bike.. because of this a F1 can be faster in a circuit than a bike or another car. cheers man
People are weird and get all defensive over this argument which ti be honest baffles me. Just to add some spice to the mix the F1 car is only restricted to the speed due to the regulations. It could go faster!
Also Schumacher and Rossi proved the transition from Bike to Car is easier than Car to Bike afew years ago as Rossi wasn't much slower than Schumacher's time in the Ferrari but Schumacher couldn't get close on the bike and said that its alot hard to to ride the bike fast than driving the car fast.
@ukmayhem YOUR A COCK..... tiff needell a EXPERT not a retard like you said a amateur can get a f1 car within a second to its peak but getting that extra second is whats extremely tough....ITS ALL ON YOUTUBE FOR YOU BIKE PRICKS TO WATCH......bikes are slower in every way...no point giving your excuses about fucking tyre traction etc....its slower end of.....
People need to understand that the Moto GP has to brake a hell of alot sooner than the F1 car even on a banked circuit. If this was on say a 2-3 mile straight the Bike would have been gone. Moto GP bike go from 0 - 60 in 2.3 seconds and 0-100 mph in 3.3 seconds, whilst F1 is 0-60 2.8 and 0-100 4.1. After 100mph the F1 cars down force will start to hold it back over the Moto GP which has none. Top Speed again the bike will beat the F1 car unless the car removes the wings.
@ukmayhem its like saying put a turbo on a f1 car or this and that...it is what it is....your excuses ukbullshitter are lame....30 SECS ON AVERAGE A GP BIKE IS DOWN ON ANY F1 CAR...... per lap......... ANOTHER CLIP CLEARLY SHOWS F1 CAR DESTROYING A MOTO GP BIKE WITH SCHU AT THE WHEEL..lets get the renault are 24 with 1000bhp out....... would be a walk over...lets say drag bike does win.........every other aspect it loses.......deal with it MATTEW
@ukmayhem thats bullshit man the only thing faster than an F1 in a straight line is a drag car, and absolutely nothing is faster around a track, ive watched every bike vs f1 vid on youtube and f1 wins every time, that and either one of these vehicles can get to top speed in like 3/4 of a mile so a 3 or 4 mile race would be pointless
@ukmayhem That's because the F1 has better brakes. And remember this. Around the circuit F1 is fastest. Bikes have fast acceleration but top end and cornering wise. It has nothing against the F1
I am a biker and I prefer watching MotoGP to F1 but the statistics are pretty clear
BHP/Kg
F1 MotoGP
1.33 1.05
Looking at circuits where both visit (Average Speed in Kmh for fastest lap in race trim in 2009)
F1 MotoGP
207 149 (Shah Alam)
202 165 (Catalnunya)
So, the average speed is 38% higher for the cars at Shah Alam and 22% higher at Catalunya. Top speeds, on the other hand, are very similar or the bikes are faster.
sorry retard but ive seen countless clips and f1 beats gp in straight...they show f1 and gp on the same track but on a different day...f1 totallt destroys gp...by first corner f1 secs ahead....they finished like 30 secs per lap ahead...go do research...schumacher race gp and beat it...f1 is shit off line as too much power and need downforce
@wr1swd84 at silver stone the f1 cars are only 4.5 secs faster than world superbikes mate:) and plus read up about what danny pedrosa and jenson button spoke about the bike hit a faster top speed then the car down the stright despite the bike entering slower and brakeing sooner button was shcoked by the bikes straight line preformence
It was in the wet. Bikes don't perform well in the wet because of the small tires compared to 4 big ass tires. Traction is everything, even in the straights.
@mi2tom Like Dannica Patrick, faster than all those "Valentinos". The only place that a bike is faster than a car, is at the street, on the hands of some stupid playboys, maybe like you mi2tom. In a circuit, against a formula car, NEVER!!!
and no the car is no fucking way pulling, even if you see it from the fucking moon or what angel and movie you seee it about the same.. but when silly speeds kick in the bike will fly..
oh yeh all you bike fans type in ...honda f1 top speed.....257mph....bye bike...oh yeh theres a 5min 38 sec of this same video...it shows f1 on other side of circuit racing bike again...car puls constantly......ive even fucking measured the distance....the car is const pulling.....fuckoff bike chap nast y fucking boys
@r1wantone you have no fucking brain....have you ever sat in f1 car retard.....it gave a pro racing driver thats driven enzos, veyron , all cars the biggest rish ever..he nearly cried with excitement...fuckyou...type in f1 becketts complex...12 sec long vid...lets see if you get that buzz on ANY CHEAP BIKE....inches from ground..you lame ass bikers all the fucking same
@wr1swd84 I take it you have never ridden a bike, if you had you wouldn't be acting like a 7 year old. I have actually been in an F1 car, 2 laps of Donnington as it happens in a 2 seater which cost me 12K a lap (Tyrell) and i can asure you don't get the same rush.
It might be a lot quicker in the corners and the breaking is awesome but it's very clinical with very little feed back.
But you wouldn't understand that as you've never experienced 0 to 140mph in 10.01 seconds have you, Prick.
The rush you get from a motorcycle and from a car are 2 completely different types. I've driven some really fast cars, and some faster bikes. Obviously nothing that compares to these. But come the fuck on you are being a little bitch about all of this. You can't generalize "bikers" by saying something as retarded as that. And buddy, learn to spell reading any of your comments hurt my eyes dearly. Mozilla has a spell check built right in, try and use that.
@wr1swd84 257mph was with no wings on. Simon i tell you all the time F1 is slower now all these other people do aswell, SHUT UP your not alway right. GIVE UP hahahaha
@ukmayhem NOBODY LISTEN TO THIS BIKE FREAK FAN....every clip sjows a f1 car pulling away on a gp bike.....THIS GP IS THE QUICKEST AND THIS F1 one of the slowest....it proves what a retard you are fucking are....the proof is in the vids....CORNERS THE BIKE LOSES what ever your fucking excuse..it loses....drag the bike fucking lost..in the real world its different to times
@ukmayhem SURPRISE EVERY COMMENT FOR THE CAR........hahahaah your blags are pointless....its like saying lower the spoiler and f1 car would beat gp even more...it is what it is......people are laughing at you... 2.3 this and 3.3 that....bullshit....its not the real world.....times vary according to the driver...f1 cars have shit 0 to 60 as there real wheel fucking drive and traction cuts power out hence the super bike kept up on fifth gear for abit...then bye bye
so chek it out F1=310kph on shanghai circiut and gp bike 340.88kph not on youtube but the results search on google.that is a rape.. and remember the bike need to brake 200/300 meter at least before the f1 car meaning the f1 car can and will accelerate much longer in time and sec and one more thing they have a much higher corner speed around50kph before the straight.. so next time take a drag over 400meters. 1mile the bike would rape the shit out of it. but in 400meters the car win..
And the F1 cars are limited by pretty tight F1 Association restrictions.
You made the point yourself, the F1 car is designed to be quick around a track, cornering etc, the more downforce you have the slower the straight line speed will be.
@AudioPhile kk take away the down force and yes the car wil hit higher top speed but do oyu know how fast the car wil be going before it can put power down? with down force its 100mph til full power with out well you work it out:)
The car has 800bhp, the bike 240. The car has 1.33 bhp/kg, the bike only 1.05. Top speed is determined by bhp vs drag provided you have enough time to reach max speed.
The only reason the bike has a higher top speed is because the aerodynamics which generate downforce also generate drag. In a low-downforce setting, it would be much faster.
It's configured for downforce because that generates grip which allows faster cornering and later braking ... and, overall, that gives faster laptimes.
did it fuck....theres a longer version than this that shows the car constantly pulling.....this side the bike got inside line and car caught it,,,yeh bike dropped off but car caught it and overtook before he did. also thats the most ub aerodynamic car in f1 ...the v10s are 100bhp more....
are you a retard...theres another vid of this....it shows someone filming from opposite side of oval where they race the first time......car pulls constantly
hey fucktard i ain't lookin at other vid's, i'm lookin at this one, and the bike pulls the car. and in the wet! don't bother replying because i ain't reading it, dumbass
lol...your just another dumb bike fan.......the cars is fucking quicker moron...theres the same clip of this but longer.......5.38secs you cunt...it shows the car at the opposite side, and guess what they race 2 times, the car pulls constantly.......cheap nasty fucking bike....all you biker fans are the same, that car fucking laps gp bikes.....oh yeh that was the most un aerodynamic in f1, also the older v10 were 100 bhp more....faggot
@wr1swd84 your a spaz mate gp bike beats f1 car in straight line and fwt if you ever had a go of a motorbike even a small 250 you would never go back to cars watch one gp race look at the over takeing and close calls and fantastic crashses
@ThePacman994 every clip shows f1 beating it..type in f1 v moto gp....lets not mention corners...fucking deal with it you cheap nasty bike fucking bitter fan ahahah...look it up go on.....click on the 650,000 view one on botton right vids...20 secs long..bye bike
@wr1swd84 yes your righht this video cleary shows a bike beating an f1 car until they brake at the end idiot of all my years seeing cars on roads ive never seen a car that can beat a 600cc bike in the qauter mile you wil never drive an f1 car you wil never even sit in an f1 car or enything close to it so shut up and go day dream aobut what its like ill beo n the roado n my bike in the sun:)
Stop being an ass. My passion is cars, or at least it used to be. I thought I had it all figured out, you know? Cars, cars, cars and cars. Time flipped that shit over for me and today I like the engineering in a car, but the bike has more testosterone to it. IMO it takes more skill to be a competitive bike rider than a competitive car driver. Not by much, but still. Although cars, mechanically, are more interesting.
Unfair racing conditions for the bike,wet track,car has far better traction with 4 huge tires,any idiot would realize this,accelerating with 2 huge contact patches in the rear works a lot better than 1 small tire.
I heard the bike, though the f1 car was closer to the camera. Moto GP bikes are very loud and are not silenced - 130dbs. Moto GP bikes hit 217Mph at catalunya!
motogp riders takes more guts than f1. Both are crazy intense though. Riding fast on a bike through twisties is scarier than in a car. at least for me (:
not really. true bikers never claim that MotoGP is faster than F1. you see, bikers are a different breed than car fanatics. We are more concerned about the actual EXPERIENCE of riding rather than boasting about mods and wheels and crap. it's OK for us that the fastest car is faster than the fastest bike because riding is not just fun, you need BALLS to ride.
Don't be fooled by those supposed riders (stunters and show boats). those fools can pop a wheelie but take them to a track and they wouldn't survive one lap
yes you are right. riding on two wheels is different. anybody can drive a car but when it comes to ride a bike not everybody have guts to do it. Riding a motorcycle is so special it's like riding a horse.
Formula 1 drivers have the biggest balls! Formula 1 cars will always win in any types of races, Even at Long straights, don't forget the DRS from the cars from 2011 season. You might be considering DRS is cheating, but think of it that way, with F1 cars, you can do anything to improve its performance just like the blown diffusers... you won't get awesome smart upgrades in dumb lousy motorbikes...
formula1nh 1 month ago
MotoGP guys have bigger balls
braceyoself777 2 months ago 2
molickamolko99 4 months ago
Both these guys must have had so much fun!
iloveneytiri 6 months ago
if they see this video the F1 dont destroy the bike in acceleration (in line). F1 distance only when the bike slows down to the corner (where the car has much more advantage, especially in wet conditions).
peace !
now i let you some accelerations of F1, MotoGP and Bugatti vs S1000RR
bruninja 1 year ago
bruninja 1 year ago 3
@bruninja dumbass lol your facts are wrong a BMW S100RR is quicker in every way then a veryon ...it doesnt take7second for a veyron to do 186mph it takes 10.10 second for it to run down the 1/4mile at high 130s and it takes a BMW S1000RR 9.53S at 156mph true f1 cars are some what quicker then moto gp bike in acceleration but not at low speeds-mid to high a f1 willl win but as fars street legal bikes vs cars A S1000RR WILL KILL ANY PRODUCATION CAR in acceleration. stop making up shit!!
barcode0954 1 year ago
Comment removed
bruninja 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@barcode0954 well i think you dont read what i really write!! i wrote veyron takes "..200 and 300 kmh in 7.3s. and 16.7s" so i mean it takes from 0 to 200km/h 7.3sec. and from 0- 300km/h 16.7sec. ! i know what i write and what i know.. its not my imagination..
bruninja 1 year ago
This moto gp bike got absolutely destroyed.
Mclarensenna 1 year ago
@Kororock , HI, You can not compare an F1 with a bike. are two different worlds! I can say is that the F1 brake later(stronger) than a bike,curve better,faster than everything. this is to the greater surface contact with the ground and the wings that produce much downforce! F1 is the pinnacle of four wheels! but in-line acceleration is more or less identical to a bike.. because of this a F1 can be faster in a circuit than a bike or another car. cheers man
bruninja 1 year ago
Lol people do make me laugh how defensive they get over it :L
shrimpo13 1 year ago
People are weird and get all defensive over this argument which ti be honest baffles me. Just to add some spice to the mix the F1 car is only restricted to the speed due to the regulations. It could go faster!
TheDelianLeague 1 year ago
bikers on a mission to prove something via internet, never get boring ;o
cbamode 1 year ago
Also Schumacher and Rossi proved the transition from Bike to Car is easier than Car to Bike afew years ago as Rossi wasn't much slower than Schumacher's time in the Ferrari but Schumacher couldn't get close on the bike and said that its alot hard to to ride the bike fast than driving the car fast.
ukmayhem 1 year ago
@ukmayhem YOUR A COCK..... tiff needell a EXPERT not a retard like you said a amateur can get a f1 car within a second to its peak but getting that extra second is whats extremely tough....ITS ALL ON YOUTUBE FOR YOU BIKE PRICKS TO WATCH......bikes are slower in every way...no point giving your excuses about fucking tyre traction etc....its slower end of.....
wr1swd84 1 year ago
People need to understand that the Moto GP has to brake a hell of alot sooner than the F1 car even on a banked circuit. If this was on say a 2-3 mile straight the Bike would have been gone. Moto GP bike go from 0 - 60 in 2.3 seconds and 0-100 mph in 3.3 seconds, whilst F1 is 0-60 2.8 and 0-100 4.1. After 100mph the F1 cars down force will start to hold it back over the Moto GP which has none. Top Speed again the bike will beat the F1 car unless the car removes the wings.
ukmayhem 1 year ago
@ukmayhem its like saying put a turbo on a f1 car or this and that...it is what it is....your excuses ukbullshitter are lame....30 SECS ON AVERAGE A GP BIKE IS DOWN ON ANY F1 CAR...... per lap......... ANOTHER CLIP CLEARLY SHOWS F1 CAR DESTROYING A MOTO GP BIKE WITH SCHU AT THE WHEEL..lets get the renault are 24 with 1000bhp out....... would be a walk over...lets say drag bike does win.........every other aspect it loses.......deal with it MATTEW
wr1swd84 1 year ago
@ukmayhem thats bullshit man the only thing faster than an F1 in a straight line is a drag car, and absolutely nothing is faster around a track, ive watched every bike vs f1 vid on youtube and f1 wins every time, that and either one of these vehicles can get to top speed in like 3/4 of a mile so a 3 or 4 mile race would be pointless
deadtofall666 1 year ago
@ukmayhem That's because the F1 has better brakes. And remember this. Around the circuit F1 is fastest. Bikes have fast acceleration but top end and cornering wise. It has nothing against the F1
c312eal 1 year ago
D ya hear the fuckin noise of that car?
Holy Shit! lol
HitchHikersBlues 1 year ago
Nothing can beat an F1 car ,except dragsters....
StoicaVladIoan 1 year ago
all arguments aside, you gotta admit that's f'ing cool. what i want to see is pedrosa in the car and good ol jenny on the bike!
phi2one 1 year ago
Comment removed
hot00stuff 1 year ago
WR1 you're a fag dude.
deadleavesdie 1 year ago
lol that guys retarded...f1 beats gp in straights....seen another clip where schu kills it....also round track its a joke...f1 laps it
wr1swd84 2 years ago
I am a biker and I prefer watching MotoGP to F1 but the statistics are pretty clear
BHP/Kg
F1 MotoGP
1.33 1.05
Looking at circuits where both visit (Average Speed in Kmh for fastest lap in race trim in 2009)
F1 MotoGP
207 149 (Shah Alam)
202 165 (Catalnunya)
So, the average speed is 38% higher for the cars at Shah Alam and 22% higher at Catalunya. Top speeds, on the other hand, are very similar or the bikes are faster.
blackblade65 2 years ago
sorry retard but ive seen countless clips and f1 beats gp in straight...they show f1 and gp on the same track but on a different day...f1 totallt destroys gp...by first corner f1 secs ahead....they finished like 30 secs per lap ahead...go do research...schumacher race gp and beat it...f1 is shit off line as too much power and need downforce
wr1swd84 2 years ago
@wr1swd84 at silver stone the f1 cars are only 4.5 secs faster than world superbikes mate:) and plus read up about what danny pedrosa and jenson button spoke about the bike hit a faster top speed then the car down the stright despite the bike entering slower and brakeing sooner button was shcoked by the bikes straight line preformence
ThePacman994 1 year ago
It was in the wet. Bikes don't perform well in the wet because of the small tires compared to 4 big ass tires. Traction is everything, even in the straights.
TurboNosHayabusa1 2 years ago
Cars always will be better. Moto's is for kids, or old guys that didnt grown up.
UrsusVonForsteck78 2 years ago
Pussies always drive cars like you jerk
mi2tom 2 years ago
@mi2tom Like Dannica Patrick, faster than all those "Valentinos". The only place that a bike is faster than a car, is at the street, on the hands of some stupid playboys, maybe like you mi2tom. In a circuit, against a formula car, NEVER!!!
UrsusVonForsteck78 1 year ago
and no the car is no fucking way pulling, even if you see it from the fucking moon or what angel and movie you seee it about the same.. but when silly speeds kick in the bike will fly..
rottepung666 2 years ago
oh yeh all you bike fans type in ...honda f1 top speed.....257mph....bye bike...oh yeh theres a 5min 38 sec of this same video...it shows f1 on other side of circuit racing bike again...car puls constantly......ive even fucking measured the distance....the car is const pulling.....fuckoff bike chap nast y fucking boys
wr1swd84 2 years ago
@wr1swd84 I was sat in a plane recently doing 560mph, it was still fucking boring!
Bikes rule for outright rush!
r1wantone 2 years ago
@r1wantone you have no fucking brain....have you ever sat in f1 car retard.....it gave a pro racing driver thats driven enzos, veyron , all cars the biggest rish ever..he nearly cried with excitement...fuckyou...type in f1 becketts complex...12 sec long vid...lets see if you get that buzz on ANY CHEAP BIKE....inches from ground..you lame ass bikers all the fucking same
wr1swd84 2 years ago
@wr1swd84 I take it you have never ridden a bike, if you had you wouldn't be acting like a 7 year old. I have actually been in an F1 car, 2 laps of Donnington as it happens in a 2 seater which cost me 12K a lap (Tyrell) and i can asure you don't get the same rush.
It might be a lot quicker in the corners and the breaking is awesome but it's very clinical with very little feed back.
But you wouldn't understand that as you've never experienced 0 to 140mph in 10.01 seconds have you, Prick.
r1wantone 2 years ago
The rush you get from a motorcycle and from a car are 2 completely different types. I've driven some really fast cars, and some faster bikes. Obviously nothing that compares to these. But come the fuck on you are being a little bitch about all of this. You can't generalize "bikers" by saying something as retarded as that. And buddy, learn to spell reading any of your comments hurt my eyes dearly. Mozilla has a spell check built right in, try and use that.
deadleavesdie 1 year ago
@wr1swd84 257mph was with no wings on. Simon i tell you all the time F1 is slower now all these other people do aswell, SHUT UP your not alway right. GIVE UP hahahaha
ukmayhem 1 year ago
@ukmayhem NOBODY LISTEN TO THIS BIKE FREAK FAN....every clip sjows a f1 car pulling away on a gp bike.....THIS GP IS THE QUICKEST AND THIS F1 one of the slowest....it proves what a retard you are fucking are....the proof is in the vids....CORNERS THE BIKE LOSES what ever your fucking excuse..it loses....drag the bike fucking lost..in the real world its different to times
wr1swd84 1 year ago
@ukmayhem SURPRISE EVERY COMMENT FOR THE CAR........hahahaah your blags are pointless....its like saying lower the spoiler and f1 car would beat gp even more...it is what it is......people are laughing at you... 2.3 this and 3.3 that....bullshit....its not the real world.....times vary according to the driver...f1 cars have shit 0 to 60 as there real wheel fucking drive and traction cuts power out hence the super bike kept up on fifth gear for abit...then bye bye
wr1swd84 1 year ago
so chek it out F1=310kph on shanghai circiut and gp bike 340.88kph not on youtube but the results search on google.that is a rape.. and remember the bike need to brake 200/300 meter at least before the f1 car meaning the f1 car can and will accelerate much longer in time and sec and one more thing they have a much higher corner speed around50kph before the straight.. so next time take a drag over 400meters. 1mile the bike would rape the shit out of it. but in 400meters the car win..
rottepung666 2 years ago 2
Do you people understand what downforce does?
And the F1 cars are limited by pretty tight F1 Association restrictions.
You made the point yourself, the F1 car is designed to be quick around a track, cornering etc, the more downforce you have the slower the straight line speed will be.
AudioPhile 2 years ago
@AudioPhile kk take away the down force and yes the car wil hit higher top speed but do oyu know how fast the car wil be going before it can put power down? with down force its 100mph til full power with out well you work it out:)
ThePacman994 1 year ago
The car has 800bhp, the bike 240. The car has 1.33 bhp/kg, the bike only 1.05. Top speed is determined by bhp vs drag provided you have enough time to reach max speed.
The only reason the bike has a higher top speed is because the aerodynamics which generate downforce also generate drag. In a low-downforce setting, it would be much faster.
It's configured for downforce because that generates grip which allows faster cornering and later braking ... and, overall, that gives faster laptimes.
blackblade65 2 years ago 2
You're definitely correct!
mi2tom 2 years ago
F1 ever win....
roby70juve 2 years ago 4
looks like the bike pulled the car in the straight but then had to brake early. the car barely slowed for the turn. downforce is a beautiful thing
hot00stuff 2 years ago
did it fuck....theres a longer version than this that shows the car constantly pulling.....this side the bike got inside line and car caught it,,,yeh bike dropped off but car caught it and overtook before he did. also thats the most ub aerodynamic car in f1 ...the v10s are 100bhp more....
wr1swd84 2 years ago
can you translate whatever you're trying to say into something understandable? thanks
hot00stuff 2 years ago
are you a retard...theres another vid of this....it shows someone filming from opposite side of oval where they race the first time......car pulls constantly
wr1swd84 2 years ago
hey fucktard i ain't lookin at other vid's, i'm lookin at this one, and the bike pulls the car. and in the wet! don't bother replying because i ain't reading it, dumbass
hot00stuff 2 years ago
lol...your just another dumb bike fan.......the cars is fucking quicker moron...theres the same clip of this but longer.......5.38secs you cunt...it shows the car at the opposite side, and guess what they race 2 times, the car pulls constantly.......cheap nasty fucking bike....all you biker fans are the same, that car fucking laps gp bikes.....oh yeh that was the most un aerodynamic in f1, also the older v10 were 100 bhp more....faggot
wr1swd84 2 years ago
@wr1swd84 your a spaz mate gp bike beats f1 car in straight line and fwt if you ever had a go of a motorbike even a small 250 you would never go back to cars watch one gp race look at the over takeing and close calls and fantastic crashses
ThePacman994 1 year ago
@ThePacman994 every clip shows f1 beating it..type in f1 v moto gp....lets not mention corners...fucking deal with it you cheap nasty bike fucking bitter fan ahahah...look it up go on.....click on the 650,000 view one on botton right vids...20 secs long..bye bike
wr1swd84 1 year ago
@wr1swd84 yes your righht this video cleary shows a bike beating an f1 car until they brake at the end idiot of all my years seeing cars on roads ive never seen a car that can beat a 600cc bike in the qauter mile you wil never drive an f1 car you wil never even sit in an f1 car or enything close to it so shut up and go day dream aobut what its like ill beo n the roado n my bike in the sun:)
ThePacman994 1 year ago
@wr1swd84
Stop being an ass. My passion is cars, or at least it used to be. I thought I had it all figured out, you know? Cars, cars, cars and cars. Time flipped that shit over for me and today I like the engineering in a car, but the bike has more testosterone to it. IMO it takes more skill to be a competitive bike rider than a competitive car driver. Not by much, but still. Although cars, mechanically, are more interesting.
corotor12345 1 year ago
bikes never gonna win against F1, even if is dry or wet, sunny or rain, wind or not wind, not even in a fucking tousand years
2006rc211v 2 years ago
well said
wr1swd84 2 years ago
I ♥ F1
ScreamingHunter 2 years ago
Unfair racing conditions for the bike,wet track,car has far better traction with 4 huge tires,any idiot would realize this,accelerating with 2 huge contact patches in the rear works a lot better than 1 small tire.
bru5520 2 years ago
I heard the bike, though the f1 car was closer to the camera. Moto GP bikes are very loud and are not silenced - 130dbs. Moto GP bikes hit 217Mph at catalunya!
PAPPACLART 2 years ago
the bike would have waked it unfair race cars are for girls real racers ride bikes
froback 2 years ago
u live in a small world..
schpyy 2 years ago
the real world mate!
froback 2 years ago
Did anyone hear a motor bike?
Ollyb2sb 2 years ago
Very close, but I think Dani was a bit skidish to go off into the turn. Banking is not a motorcycle's friend.
mobius5759 2 years ago
They're neck-a-neck when Dani sits up. Very close indeed.
sinbaadi 2 years ago
ye cant drive an F1 down to the shops. There might be a speed bump going into the carpark. lol
mrkennethporter 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
motogp riders takes more guts than f1. Both are crazy intense though. Riding fast on a bike through twisties is scarier than in a car. at least for me (:
cmastrflash 3 years ago
Comment removed
cmastrflash 3 years ago
Nothing beats a Formula1
ronaldrutgers77 3 years ago 2
motogp is king
kacipapo 3 years ago
beautiful machine!
aaron9696024 3 years ago
Pwned and rightly so
kirkmach32 3 years ago
not really. true bikers never claim that MotoGP is faster than F1. you see, bikers are a different breed than car fanatics. We are more concerned about the actual EXPERIENCE of riding rather than boasting about mods and wheels and crap. it's OK for us that the fastest car is faster than the fastest bike because riding is not just fun, you need BALLS to ride.
joonsuk88 3 years ago 20
Don't be fooled by those supposed riders (stunters and show boats). those fools can pop a wheelie but take them to a track and they wouldn't survive one lap
joonsuk88 3 years ago 10
amen to that, brother.
marcellon2003 2 years ago
same mind thinking bro,
2006rc211v 2 years ago
@joonsuk88 Thats what i'm talking about!
thelight1212 1 year ago
yes you are right. riding on two wheels is different. anybody can drive a car but when it comes to ride a bike not everybody have guts to do it. Riding a motorcycle is so special it's like riding a horse.
alandxp 2 years ago
yeah a horse that lose always vs cars....remember .....F1!!!!!!!!!
gdmaster5 2 years ago
In straights is even but on cornering... nothing can keep up with a F1.
DeScRuN 3 years ago