There's no LGA2011 processor in this video. It was never revealed until this week. Posted on Feb 16, 2011? Yeah, this guy is a retard. Leave it to the professional reviewers, sport.
@stavsen1993 I love how all 2011 socket boards are compatible with 1155 like that mobo by msi (forgot the name) but it features PCIE 3.0 and support for 1155 and 2011; good thing intel is going to replace 1366 with 2011 bc that needed an upgrade.
@SWOgottaGO That is the complete opposite of what I've heard. Linus techtips and motherboardsdotorg stated that the LGA2011 socket mother boards will support backwards compatibility with 1155 CPU's. I also know that the LGA2011 is going to replace the LGA1366.
@dreich666 No need to be a dick; and before you call me a dumb ass you should capitalize your sentences. Ivy Bridge is backwards compatible with existing LGA-1155 motherboards, although there will be a new chipset for Ivy Bridge and new motherboards to enable some features (e.g. PCI Express 3.0, native USB 3.0). The new chipset family falls under the 7-series banner. We'll see Z77, Z75, H77, Q77, Q75 and B75 available at or around launch.
@NocredRS Yeah that depends on how big each die is. Maybe its just that the extra pins make the CPU bigger. The die size will probably be the same size due to the new 22nm architechure.
@NocredRS I do. The transistor size has been reduced significantly since 1990, but the addition of cores make them bigger. Even the 8 core bulldozers are bigger. Im just wondering whats the problem of making them bigger? Its not like you're going to remove the cooler and look at the CPU all day.
I have a i7 920. I have yet to find a program that would even use all the cores. I also had the Lga775 extreme cores when they came out. We could keep all cores running at full speed with programs we used. But when we just went to the I7 920... There was no use to get a faster processor.
We never found a way to keep all the cores running at full speed that we would use? Unless they speed up the Internet or something??? What are we going to do with 12 or a new processor. Unless the Internet gets faster so they can download more trash on my computer
@MrGrandDragon Probably not ! Remember the time when the socket 775 came out? the 45nm intel processor were never backward compatible with the older socket 775 MB .......
show the specs, oh yeah thats right you'll again need a completely new mother board set up. cause the old ones won't except the new chips, cause again Intel clowned all you idiots into supporting them buying a 1000 dollar chip that only out performs a 45nm chip by 7-8%
@juggernautxtr I'd buy it ... does that mean i am an Idiot or simply I want it and have the money to squander. I rather have Intel than budget friendly poor people CPU like AMD .... techs change exponentially I am sure this CPU needs a whole new MB for a reason ..... you wont put a 2011 or later 600 HP engine on a 1980s chassis , transmission, etc... would you?
@darkrobroy14 lol thats a bad example becuase my dad just last summer got his v8 bored and stroked to a 494 CI with 620 horse and 650 ftlbs of torque....and put it in his 67 camaro....
@juggernautxtr that depends on the number of cores and threads because if you have a 45 nm with 2 threads of each 2.8 Ghz and then a 22 nm with 12 threads of 3.1 Ghz of course it's not a lot of improvement of the core frequency but over all it's a great improve +0.3Ghz per core * 12 = 3.6 more over all on the 37.2 Ghz i'm exaggerating a bit but i'm sure you get my point if you do some OC or you know about cpu's
@juggernautxtr $300 for a chip that is faster than all AMD chips seems like a good deal to me. According to Cinebench benchmark, the 2600K is even faster than the AMD server chips, the Opterons. Looking at SiSoft Sandra, AMD has nothing that really compares to Intel at the moment. Maybe with Bulldozer, but it's already built on dated tech.
@cbremer83 Now there's a 2700K, and Bulldozer has become Faildozer. Those AMD octo-core, 125W Zambezi chips are slower than Intel's quad-core, 95W 2600's.
@BritaniaRuleAgain Well, I did post that five months ago, well before Bulldozer hit. But, it was pretty bad. Unlike SB, these where soft launched. No fan fair, no bundle deals at work. Nothing. We didn't even know they went on sale till they arrived a couple days before hand. I think AMD knew they had a turkey.
@cbremer83 Such a sad day for the tech world when Bulldozer hit. Now nothing will compete against Intel, and they well shortly divert their focuses to the mobile market.
@BritaniaRuleAgain first up the 2700K is likely to be the last CPU Intel dose for the 1155 series, secondly DDR4 is around the corner due out next year so that ends the new 2011 platforms. what AMD has done is brought out an am3+ platform meaning that when an AM4 platform is made all of the the newer better CPU will slot right into AM3+ thus eventually AM3+ will be better then the 1155 series
This has been flagged as spam show
0:14
do they even know what they are holding ?
lehmejoun 2 months ago
my rig to those asian chicks
technologu 3 months ago
1366 doesn't have eight core processors either, OMFG. This video is a fail, delete it.
Phenomental1ty 3 months ago 5
There's no LGA2011 processor in this video. It was never revealed until this week. Posted on Feb 16, 2011? Yeah, this guy is a retard. Leave it to the professional reviewers, sport.
Phenomental1ty 3 months ago
@Phenomental1ty LGA2011 has existed for awhile now, it was used for Intel Xeon CPUs until X79 was announced.
Segadude3000 3 months ago
I want an i7 3980X on a Rampage IV Extreme with 8X4GB Dominator GTX3!
Opelfreakie 3 months ago
@Opelfreakie i7 3960X ***
Phenomental1ty 3 months ago
will the i7 2700k, 2600k or i5 2500k work with the new x79 mobos?
SNOWSKIJUNKY 3 months ago
@SNOWSKIJUNKY No, the x79 motherboards require socket LGA 2011, while the processors you've listed are LGA 1155. Lga 2011 is much bigger
Miles360x 3 months ago
@Miles360x ahh but the ivy bridge will work with the old z68/possibly p67.... i just had stuff mixed up thanks though!
SNOWSKIJUNKY 3 months ago
@SNOWSKIJUNKY no not all, only the ones released for 1155.
raketenDK 3 months ago
Where did you get that last picture from? what was the name of the case?
is it at all possible to buy a x79 motheboard and lga2011 procecors at this time?
TatsuJB 3 months ago
I only liked it because of cute Asian girls! :)
ZinayH 3 months ago
LGA 2011 has to have 2011 pins. But in your case there is only 1567 pins. Stop BULLING US!!!!
stavsen1993 5 months ago
@stavsen1993 I love how all 2011 socket boards are compatible with 1155 like that mobo by msi (forgot the name) but it features PCIE 3.0 and support for 1155 and 2011; good thing intel is going to replace 1366 with 2011 bc that needed an upgrade.
darkheat246 4 months ago
@darkheat246 No. LGA1155 is compatible with IB. The LGA2011 socket is for SB-E alone and is not compatible with LGA1155.
SWOgottaGO 4 months ago
@SWOgottaGO That is the complete opposite of what I've heard. Linus techtips and motherboardsdotorg stated that the LGA2011 socket mother boards will support backwards compatibility with 1155 CPU's. I also know that the LGA2011 is going to replace the LGA1366.
darkheat246 4 months ago
@darkheat246 if that's genuinely what you have heard then you should go get checked. if that's just what you understood then sorry, you're a dumbass
dreich666 4 months ago
@dreich666 No need to be a dick; and before you call me a dumb ass you should capitalize your sentences. Ivy Bridge is backwards compatible with existing LGA-1155 motherboards, although there will be a new chipset for Ivy Bridge and new motherboards to enable some features (e.g. PCI Express 3.0, native USB 3.0). The new chipset family falls under the 7-series banner. We'll see Z77, Z75, H77, Q77, Q75 and B75 available at or around launch.
darkheat246 4 months ago
@darkheat246 Knowing Intel I don't think this is far-fetch. It must be like you are saying here.
SWOgottaGO 4 months ago
@darkheat246 You must have been confused with the numbers.
SWOgottaGO 4 months ago
@SWOgottaGO I got that information from here. anandtech com/show/4830/intels-ivy-bridge-architecture-exposed
darkheat246 4 months ago
recognized the song as soon as I heard it. it's a non-vocal version of "Forever" by Savage Genius.
TheGreatKeEsH 5 months ago
@NocredRS well this just tells you that having 2011 contact pins is freaking insane
xmodmodifier 5 months ago
paused at 0:16
haven't seen the rest of the video yet, probably never will
psychosavant 6 months ago
The very large cpu is LGA1567, not LGA2011
chrisdildilio 6 months ago
@chrisdildilio
yes you right
zqdz123 5 months ago
name of the song plz tell me !!!
LeaveNoEvident256 6 months ago
@NocredRS Yeah that depends on how big each die is. Maybe its just that the extra pins make the CPU bigger. The die size will probably be the same size due to the new 22nm architechure.
minglianz 6 months ago
@NocredRS I do. The transistor size has been reduced significantly since 1990, but the addition of cores make them bigger. Even the 8 core bulldozers are bigger. Im just wondering whats the problem of making them bigger? Its not like you're going to remove the cooler and look at the CPU all day.
minglianz 6 months ago
@NocredRS Whats wrong with them being bigger?
minglianz 6 months ago
I have a i7 920. I have yet to find a program that would even use all the cores. I also had the Lga775 extreme cores when they came out. We could keep all cores running at full speed with programs we used. But when we just went to the I7 920... There was no use to get a faster processor.
ExTREMEHSMACHINE 7 months ago
We never found a way to keep all the cores running at full speed that we would use? Unless they speed up the Internet or something??? What are we going to do with 12 or a new processor. Unless the Internet gets faster so they can download more trash on my computer
ExTREMEHSMACHINE 7 months ago
Comment removed
ExTREMEHSMACHINE 7 months ago
Shure is not a word
jewie27 9 months ago
Quick question,
The main advantage to Ivy bridge will be its support for the new 22nm Processor chips right?
But I have heard that the new Processors will be backwards compatible (with LGA1155 - P67) so what is the point?!
MrGrandDragon 9 months ago
@MrGrandDragon Probably not ! Remember the time when the socket 775 came out? the 45nm intel processor were never backward compatible with the older socket 775 MB .......
LeaveNoEvident256 9 months ago
what is the name of this song O.O? I love it ! Good video Btw , I love to see how they will go against the bulldozer from AMD !
LeaveNoEvident256 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Congratulations to you too, this is another great Channel on YouTube. Hey! My Web Site is up so check it out to show your support PCTechStream. Com
techstreaming 9 months ago
lga 1567 ?????
TheXtremeGamer90 10 months ago
@TheXtremeGamer90 it is a Server based socket
renzsmartbro 9 months ago
wow nice girl^^
fight360uk 10 months ago
show the specs, oh yeah thats right you'll again need a completely new mother board set up. cause the old ones won't except the new chips, cause again Intel clowned all you idiots into supporting them buying a 1000 dollar chip that only out performs a 45nm chip by 7-8%
idiots never cease to amaze.
juggernautxtr 11 months ago
@juggernautxtr I'd buy it ... does that mean i am an Idiot or simply I want it and have the money to squander. I rather have Intel than budget friendly poor people CPU like AMD .... techs change exponentially I am sure this CPU needs a whole new MB for a reason ..... you wont put a 2011 or later 600 HP engine on a 1980s chassis , transmission, etc... would you?
darkrobroy14 10 months ago
@darkrobroy14 lol thats a bad example becuase my dad just last summer got his v8 bored and stroked to a 494 CI with 620 horse and 650 ftlbs of torque....and put it in his 67 camaro....
POPCORN454545 10 months ago
@POPCORN454545 lmao yep i guess it is, i knew it was gonna backfire lol but u get what i was trying to explain though hopefully
darkrobroy14 10 months ago
@darkrobroy14 yeah yeah for shure....
POPCORN454545 10 months ago
@darkrobroy14 It's called a sleeper
juggernautxtr 10 months ago
@juggernautxtr that depends on the number of cores and threads because if you have a 45 nm with 2 threads of each 2.8 Ghz and then a 22 nm with 12 threads of 3.1 Ghz of course it's not a lot of improvement of the core frequency but over all it's a great improve +0.3Ghz per core * 12 = 3.6 more over all on the 37.2 Ghz i'm exaggerating a bit but i'm sure you get my point if you do some OC or you know about cpu's
MrMousekiller9 8 months ago
@MrMousekiller9 well i personally am not a super genius on cpu's, but i kinow what your saying.
my point was that intel has never been backward compatible. and the price is way out of even it's own league.
if it outperformed by better than 30% I could see that price for their stuff, but it's snot.
juggernautxtr 8 months ago
@juggernautxtr $300 for a chip that is faster than all AMD chips seems like a good deal to me. According to Cinebench benchmark, the 2600K is even faster than the AMD server chips, the Opterons. Looking at SiSoft Sandra, AMD has nothing that really compares to Intel at the moment. Maybe with Bulldozer, but it's already built on dated tech.
cbremer83 8 months ago
@cbremer83 Now there's a 2700K, and Bulldozer has become Faildozer. Those AMD octo-core, 125W Zambezi chips are slower than Intel's quad-core, 95W 2600's.
BritaniaRuleAgain 2 months ago 3
@BritaniaRuleAgain Well, I did post that five months ago, well before Bulldozer hit. But, it was pretty bad. Unlike SB, these where soft launched. No fan fair, no bundle deals at work. Nothing. We didn't even know they went on sale till they arrived a couple days before hand. I think AMD knew they had a turkey.
cbremer83 2 months ago
@cbremer83 Such a sad day for the tech world when Bulldozer hit. Now nothing will compete against Intel, and they well shortly divert their focuses to the mobile market.
BritaniaRuleAgain 2 months ago
@BritaniaRuleAgain first up the 2700K is likely to be the last CPU Intel dose for the 1155 series, secondly DDR4 is around the corner due out next year so that ends the new 2011 platforms. what AMD has done is brought out an am3+ platform meaning that when an AM4 platform is made all of the the newer better CPU will slot right into AM3+ thus eventually AM3+ will be better then the 1155 series
omgpwnz1 2 months ago
@omgpwnz1 "Eventually". Upon this event, 1155 chips will be a thing of the past in the Intel catalog.
BritaniaRuleAgain 2 months ago