This is amazing technology. Fantastic stuff. I've met one of the top people in the UT-Dallas engineering school and it does not surprise me to hear that they are involved in this. This is really impressive stuff. Bravo to U of Florida, UTD and TED.
11:00 Justin Hall Tipping: "We can do better than this. It's just plain wrong" to picture of "Vulture waiting on baby African girl's death for lack of water."
Jct: Yes, itis plain wrong but no you can not do better than that. You don't have enough money and not until you figure out how to grant her some purchasing power, there is nothing you can do. What morted her wasn't the lack of water, it was the lack interest-free credit to buy her life support. She couldn't afford the loan.
So you keep working on them cheaper energy and water while John the Banking Systems Engineer keeps working on getting them cheapest interest-free credit line at the bank based on time paid back when they grow up. And, "yes, they are why we have to solve our problems."
Yeah, like this seems really cool, but where is it? Like, if these things can ALREADY be done, why are they not being done, at all? I have to kind of think that he is either making all this crap up, or idk.
With that disempowering viewpoint they have already won. If you want to see change in the world you must change you. Make a small step in using alternatives that are optimal for life.
he could have used any other picture but he chose to use a black child from africa...he could of used one from america or russia or india or china or korea...but he chose africa...shame on you
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
No to be a big asshole... but call me when you have some actual products... I've seen these things/claims, or similar, time and time again. But it would seem they never see the light of day out side the labs. Sadly.
@Superlortenar It's pessimists like you that never allows these ideas to be products, stop standing on a fucking pedestal and for a change just believe that it might actually work. You don't look smart or better than anyone if you always act as a skeptic. And please don't expect these people to shove these products up your asses, we have to put some effort in to it too.
@ricodelta1 Thorium nuclear power using a fast breeder reactor, only prototypes have been made, but we have essentially unlimited thorium, it is cleaner than any other nuclear technology, and it can 'burn' existing nuclear waste. It will solve several problems, unlimited water, unlimited power, no CO2, and removes 95% of existing nuclear waste. The only issue is it is nothing like existing nuclear tech and will need an entire industry build around it from scratch costing $25billion minimum.
His research will be buried, bought out, or key people will be killed. The status quo/powers that be don't want this to happen. This will free the people and destroy their hold over us.
Dude - Why do you show a picture of a nuclear cooling tower as evidence of "burning up the planet"? That is STEAM, harmless to the environment. Also, carbon is invisible, smog =/= CO2
I love the idea, however what is not mentioned is simple efficiency. What is the efficiency of such a unit in conversion and power density. Photovoltaics are 15% efficient and rely on that someone what steady 1000 watt meter square of isolation, this requires quite a bit area of area to generate sufficient power. This technology needs to surpass 15% efficiency and cost quite a bit less than other alternative energies. I do hope the research continues as this will undoubtedly be beneficial.
Free energy? So the materials to build this shit is magical, it comes out of my ass? What about the finished product? It will just appear? Or does someone have to MANUFACTURE this. There's a thing called "capital expenditure".
This won't happen if lobbyists have anything to say about it. First you'll need to do away with lobbying and patents for this technology to stand any chance to truly happening.
I wouldn't count on fusion. 50 years ago they said it'd take 50 years to be commercialized, and NOW most scientists still say it'd take 50 years to be commercialized.
Also, he's trying to solving the WORLD's energy problem, not the energy problem of technically advanced/rich states. There's no way for many of the world's countries to build anything related to nuclear fission for one reason or another. Not to mention they don't have the infrastructure to transport that energy to remote regions.
Nanotubes currently cost a hundred dollars per gram to produce. They are expensive because they require a crapload of time and energy to make
Besides solar power isn't the densest energy source we can tap. There's breeder-fission which could be as cheap as a thousandth of a cent per kilowatt (see LFTR), and fusion via PNE which would litterally make money over operation time by transmuting fissile isotopes for a few lithium and deuterium (see PACER). All this could be available within 10 years.
Manufacturing those carbon nano electron-using materials is an expensive process, still, requiring quite some old-school energy. And investments, huge funding. Who does he think pays for that? Free is something we don't have to pay for. We *will* have to pay for this, either by the currency then existing, or by exchanging something else of value. Free my ass, Justin.
@mellamosean Actually, it is, in a way. Just like yours is. We're all captives of the guardians of the status quo on energy, work and money right now.
The guy is not a scientist, he's a business man (a venture capitalist), and this is one big advertisement for his company. He is getting out his photo of a dying kid while he has probably traded grain futures in the past. I'm skeptical of his claims and his sincerity. I hope he is sincere about keeping people from starving to death and creating free energy, but all the evidence would point toward him and his mates finding a way to make free energy incredibly profitable....
@aimloe That is because in our current state they need cash to fund and further advance the science behind it... some day when these and many other sciences are put into practical use they will pretty much make many jobs and things that people are employed to do obsolete... i wonder what will happen when the idea of money is finally irrelevant.
Have a read of the Board friends. Chair is a Christian nutter who also sits on a bunch of think tank/charity boards, one of which promotes intelligent design... A number of guys tied up with Morgan Stanley & Goldman Sachs, Defence, Intelligence, CFO is ex-Arthur-Anderson... AND WAIT FOR IT... Majority interest is the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, the second largest producer of LNG in the US. I'd buy Greek bonds before giving them money. Someone tied up with Al Gore in there too. Green energy bubble?
Of course, the biggest problem will always be effectively and efficiently mass producing this stuff. Fossil fuels proliferated before they were clean. Nuclear energy proliferated before it was safe. Solar energy proliferated before it was efficient. "Where is this stuff going to fall?" is the real question.
Justin - where are you....! You came to Goa and disappear too fast.........please make us know how to contact you..........India has the money - the man power - the sun and the desperate need of every thing your teem of geniuses are discovering.
Money is more important. I ,personally, can't make any money off this. If the choice is between the individual or the world, the individual will always fuck the world.
@14users Can't make money off of this? The new devices in the forms of high technology, transportation, electronics, water purification and so on that would become possible due to this would be beyond count. If you cannot see money in that then please never go into venture capitalism.
The moment he started talking about global warming as if it was a scientific fact my red flags went up. As I suspected he never got to the point, how much energy a given panel of the material produces, compared to a normal photovoltaic one?! Sure it must be cheaper than a monocrystalline silicon panel, but how much efficient is it?!
This man is not only a scientist, he is a humanitarian. I cringe at what Big Oil thinks of this. In my lifetime I would LOVE to see the madness end, while intelligent thought and progress like this, take root in our world.
This guy is like a modern day alchemist. His fantasy window pane power plants are limited by the power provided by sunlight, which is sadly inadequate for our power demands. In other words, the amount of raw energy that falls upon your entire home isn't enough to power it.
@Applest2oApples In other words, you're comically, completely wrong. Do you have any idea how much power is in sunlight? Maybe you should use your brain for a moment... how can someone today power their home by only covering half of their roof with solar cells with only 15-25% efficiency.
If you could capture all the power provided by the sunlight that falls on one house, you could power many houses. You just made an epic logic fail... I feel embarrassed for you.
@tooosweeet Hehe, this reply you made to someone else I know. But please allow me to perhaps pique your interest in this little invention that has been around for many years, but was never used due to the 80's oil crisis and lack of funding, enjoy.
@Applest2oApples Rofl xD. On a hot day, with a black roof absorbing some 10-15% of the heat from the sun, I can fry a damn egg and boil water. Don't believe me? Do this; take a black hose, if it's not black then paint it black, with a non-shiny paint, make it 20 meters long, put it in bright daylight, pump water through it and I dare you to stand under said water coming out :p
@vanakes Any start up costs would be enormous. It's in the 'longterm' savings that the benefits would occur. Once mass production and consumption occur, costs would eventually lower.
Creating a new infrastructure, disassembling the old one, and handling the surge of initial unemployment is another 'cost'.
It's daunting but not impossible. If we live to see it happen we'll also suffer through it as well. It's our children, possibly our grandchildren that would truly benefit from this change.
Just to make that clear; One of the members of the Board of Directors of Nanoholdings (the company the guy above, Justin Hall, part owns, and the company that is patenting all of these great ideas so it can no doubt monopolize 'free energy') represents the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, the 2nd largest Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) producer in the US.... The perfect sell; ending poverty through free energy. Who could criticise a bloke selling that... Don't accept anything without using your brains first
@ickybug The oil and gas CEO's are the biggest supporters of green energy technologies. They are the ones that fund this kind of research because they intend on dominating this market as well as the oil and gas markets.
@TheTruthNothinMore I'm sorry but there is far more evidence of oil and gas companies suppressing alternative energy much more than supporting it. Feigning support was one way of killing the electric car.
No sensible energy company is going to support tech that gives people un-metered energy imo
@daicon1v They will if they can sell the tech, they can sell this tech. It would take many many gears to kill them anyway, no one is honestly afraid of that.
This is greatly inspirational - but there is a long history to the cover up of free energy - stretching back 100 years and more. One also needs a view of the "larger picture" to understand why the sort of technology that Justin Hall Tipping is developing has not been in general use already. Part of the reason that most are unaware of is that this sort of technology has already been developed, weaponised and used - Google Dr Judy Wood 9/11 and Free Energy.
Yeah but how much money does this energy storing grid cost per household. If it's expensive as those solar panels, then most people will ignore it, never mind the rhetoric talk on imagination and wonders of what ifs' land.
wow. inspirational stuff. I agree with the comments re the corporates' claws into our govts making any changes more difficult. time for a massive rethink eh?
@Hallibutbouy The conductor is 1000 times more conductive than copper, so in effect could collect solar energy up to 1000 times more efficiently than today's current solar panels.
@soulsanctuarymusic1 Copper has a static resistivity of 1.68*10E-8 ohm-meters. That is very conductive. 1000 times greater doesn't gain you much, and what does conductivity have to do with what he's talking about?
@soulsanctuarymusic1 "collect solar energy up to 1000 times more efficiently" If using a superconductor instead of copper you probably wouldn't collect enough extra energy to be noticed. What does 1000 times greater mean in this context?
@SuperFinGuy my bad, but whatever they are currently made of, i was trying to suggest that the more conductive the material, the more efficient they would be at absorbing solar energy. Or is that incorrect?
@soulsanctuarymusic1 Conductivity is important but what is most important is the photovoltaic effect of the material. You can have say a superconductor but it won't build an electric tension is it doesn't have a photovoltaic effect.
@gregory06 seems to me that is comparing apples to oranges, science helps us live better/easier, where as religion in its best sense helps us act/behave better and offers an idea of what comes after death.
@fireinthemountains are you seriously questioning Dr Tesla!? To his dying day he said it was possible to implement his world system only it would cost a bit of money & will of those in power. This system proposed by Hall is a red herring.
@depro9 I agree with this statement. It is seemingly the will of corporations to crush innovation over profits. So, the will will have to come from somewhere not guarded by selfishness. The money likewise.
It is unfair to call this a red herring, but perhaps it is overstated. It is hard to see how all of our electricity can come from surrounding solar light, when this is of less energy than is needed to power devices of varying sorts.
It could still help though. 1 kW less is still 1 kW
@fireinthemountains The conductor is 1000 times more conductive than copper, so in effect could collect solar energy up to 1000 times more efficiently than today's current solar panels.
this dude could be talking about a tits powered telekinetic plasma screen video game system with quantum rocket launchers and stealth pineapple, and it would still put me to sleep.
@SamieOld its not an isotope. what you mean is allotrope. the carbon nanotubes he refers to were not the subject of last years Nobel - that was graphene. carbon nanotubes were discovered shortly after "fullerenes" ....C60 (buckyballs) & the like
@jarthos123 they know what he is saying is bullshit! Tesla said we could pull water from the atmosphere cheap & easily using only electricity. They do this in Abu Dhabi to make it rain now & then.
I had to stop after the first two minutes were complete bullshit. Has this guy never even thought about remedial statistics? The fact that an event can take 50-100 years to recover from does not mean that it's abnormal, it could very well mean that it is an event that normally happens once or twice every hundred years! I fully accept AGW, but he is still a crank.
@opcn18 Whether that's a fact or not, he was merely establishing a point about what we perceive as 'normal' and by no means did he base the rest of the talk on it, you missed an eye opening speech and should put that small error to one side and watch the whole thing. I honestly can't wait for the day this technology becomes viable and is widely used
@xSkitZx ? He has injected false information and used it to reach a false conclusion and that false conclusion is the basis of his appeal. That's not something you brush off.
@soulsanctuarymusic1 Yes calling me a moron makes you sound so much more correct.
I didn't miss the poitn, I just didn't address it because it is irrelevant to the concern I raised, that's a point that you missed. No matter what he is arguing for when he presents bull like the first two minutes of his talk he should be called out on it. Nothing excuses injecting false information into your argument.
Being all things are manipulated(silly humans), the freeing energy, must come down to a mfg. capability ro the same as a small buisness, this is where pricing stays low due to over participation. Get the process down to where 50K$ can set up a Carbon Vaporizer for deposition and then there will be no 20 years for ROI, no interest for GE to try to contain the buisness.
General Electric, 3-M, Duke Energy and southern Electric will assure the pricing will include a ROI only after 20 year, effectivley, eliminating a water starved child in Africa from participating. "Too difficult, too expensive".. and now they are going to give it away? No. Consumers will care less whether Coal or NG or Carbon tubes deliver the "Electron".. and they will be charged for it, inproportions comprable to Coal, NG and grid supplied "Electrons".
Why in the hell would someone dislike this? Dipshits.
hmsixsixsix 1 day ago
whats holding Justin Hall back??? he seems to pretty much have all the pieces worked out. where is are free energy?
squeeks555 1 week ago
I've seen this single TedTalk almost a hundred times now.
samster92 2 weeks ago
Id love to see some numbers of how effective this is, is it working on a scale that will be useable?
roflex2 3 weeks ago
This is amazing technology. Fantastic stuff. I've met one of the top people in the UT-Dallas engineering school and it does not surprise me to hear that they are involved in this. This is really impressive stuff. Bravo to U of Florida, UTD and TED.
Hwy6AandM0 3 weeks ago
This is amazing, simply and utterly amazing.
Chimmy912 3 weeks ago
Very interesting, but I wish he'd gone a bit more in detail since I didn't quite understand the way this tech works.
TheUnchainedMind 1 month ago
11:00 Justin Hall Tipping: "We can do better than this. It's just plain wrong" to picture of "Vulture waiting on baby African girl's death for lack of water."
Jct: Yes, itis plain wrong but no you can not do better than that. You don't have enough money and not until you figure out how to grant her some purchasing power, there is nothing you can do. What morted her wasn't the lack of water, it was the lack interest-free credit to buy her life support. She couldn't afford the loan.
kingofthepaupers 1 month ago
So you keep working on them cheaper energy and water while John the Banking Systems Engineer keeps working on getting them cheapest interest-free credit line at the bank based on time paid back when they grow up. And, "yes, they are why we have to solve our problems."
kingofthepaupers 1 month ago
Good Video, Thanks for shared
Spasatcom 1 month ago
Wysips, search for it!
Some French dudes are trying to put it on smartphones by next year (phones you don't ever have to charge), go Frenchies! :D
BopNiblets 1 month ago
Yeah, like this seems really cool, but where is it? Like, if these things can ALREADY be done, why are they not being done, at all? I have to kind of think that he is either making all this crap up, or idk.
splendidrobthedisgus 2 months ago
@splendidrobthedisgus do you REALLY think that the giant oil corporations would allow this to pass through? PLEASEEE stop being so naive :)
3035kimtw 2 months ago
With that disempowering viewpoint they have already won. If you want to see change in the world you must change you. Make a small step in using alternatives that are optimal for life.
Whoisemmanuel 1 month ago
@3035kimtw you're one of those douchers, right?
jrainz14 1 month ago
he could have used any other picture but he chose to use a black child from africa...he could of used one from america or russia or india or china or korea...but he chose africa...shame on you
3y3n5tyn 2 months ago
@3y3n5tyn That's a Pulitzer prize photo he has, the original.
mystrdat 2 months ago
i am liking this guy
3y3n5tyn 2 months ago
This man wins destiny.
mystrdat 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Homosexual activists understand the power of words.
Please visit my channel to watch a one-minute video clip in which popular atheist author Richard Dawkins admits that homosexual activists "hijacked the word 'gay'".
The word "homosexual" is more appropriate and accurate because it, unlike the word "gay", actually describes the behavior/attraction/relationship being discussed.
The word "gay" helps homosexual activists push their agenda.
lightandbeautiful 2 months ago
Now that is what technology should be about.
oliverdamian 2 months ago
And anoying
ironjamesvane 2 months ago
Music is to loud
ironjamesvane 2 months ago
I love the idea, but why have we not seen any prototypes? Are there problems in mass producing it, is it too expensive etc?
roflex2 3 months ago 2
No to be a big asshole... but call me when you have some actual products... I've seen these things/claims, or similar, time and time again. But it would seem they never see the light of day out side the labs. Sadly.
Superlortenar 3 months ago 3
@Superlortenar It's pessimists like you that never allows these ideas to be products, stop standing on a fucking pedestal and for a change just believe that it might actually work. You don't look smart or better than anyone if you always act as a skeptic. And please don't expect these people to shove these products up your asses, we have to put some effort in to it too.
3035kimtw 2 months ago
@Superlortenar Ever heard of the word 'suppression'? Check it out, you might learn something.
deltrontheory 1 month ago
@Superlortenar Might have soemthing to do with the largest industry in the world (energy) suppressing tech. *cough* Tesla *cough*
RedCrow1973 1 month ago
cold fusion is the only real answer that will solve the problem
everything else is just an ad hoc band aid
ricodelta1 3 months ago
@ricodelta1 Fusion is indeed a solution. Cold fusion was itself a fictitious claim
alvitechau 3 months ago
@ricodelta1 Thorium nuclear power using a fast breeder reactor, only prototypes have been made, but we have essentially unlimited thorium, it is cleaner than any other nuclear technology, and it can 'burn' existing nuclear waste. It will solve several problems, unlimited water, unlimited power, no CO2, and removes 95% of existing nuclear waste. The only issue is it is nothing like existing nuclear tech and will need an entire industry build around it from scratch costing $25billion minimum.
roflex2 3 months ago
His research will be buried, bought out, or key people will be killed. The status quo/powers that be don't want this to happen. This will free the people and destroy their hold over us.
chrisjstone1975 3 months ago
Dude - Why do you show a picture of a nuclear cooling tower as evidence of "burning up the planet"? That is STEAM, harmless to the environment. Also, carbon is invisible, smog =/= CO2
LegendATL 3 months ago 2
I love the idea, however what is not mentioned is simple efficiency. What is the efficiency of such a unit in conversion and power density. Photovoltaics are 15% efficient and rely on that someone what steady 1000 watt meter square of isolation, this requires quite a bit area of area to generate sufficient power. This technology needs to surpass 15% efficiency and cost quite a bit less than other alternative energies. I do hope the research continues as this will undoubtedly be beneficial.
PRJuly 3 months ago
so when usa killing this person ??
mohabbatshakil 3 months ago
Free energy? So the materials to build this shit is magical, it comes out of my ass? What about the finished product? It will just appear? Or does someone have to MANUFACTURE this. There's a thing called "capital expenditure".
seventyfive1 3 months ago
This won't happen if lobbyists have anything to say about it. First you'll need to do away with lobbying and patents for this technology to stand any chance to truly happening.
ScytheNoire 3 months ago
I wouldn't count on fusion. 50 years ago they said it'd take 50 years to be commercialized, and NOW most scientists still say it'd take 50 years to be commercialized.
Also, he's trying to solving the WORLD's energy problem, not the energy problem of technically advanced/rich states. There's no way for many of the world's countries to build anything related to nuclear fission for one reason or another. Not to mention they don't have the infrastructure to transport that energy to remote regions.
TheHeartMachine 3 months ago
Nanotubes currently cost a hundred dollars per gram to produce. They are expensive because they require a crapload of time and energy to make
Besides solar power isn't the densest energy source we can tap. There's breeder-fission which could be as cheap as a thousandth of a cent per kilowatt (see LFTR), and fusion via PNE which would litterally make money over operation time by transmuting fissile isotopes for a few lithium and deuterium (see PACER). All this could be available within 10 years.
OfficeThug 3 months ago
Manufacturing those carbon nano electron-using materials is an expensive process, still, requiring quite some old-school energy. And investments, huge funding. Who does he think pays for that? Free is something we don't have to pay for. We *will* have to pay for this, either by the currency then existing, or by exchanging something else of value. Free my ass, Justin.
Meowbay 3 months ago
@Meowbay
why, is your ass in captivity?
mellamosean 3 months ago 7
@mellamosean Actually, it is, in a way. Just like yours is. We're all captives of the guardians of the status quo on energy, work and money right now.
Meowbay 3 months ago
@mellamosean lmao
ThyrmBloodaxe 2 months ago
check this out.... thrive movement.com
insightstar 3 months ago
Wow so amazing! The oil sector will kill this guy for sure!
KonigKraft 3 months ago
@KonigKraft See response to ickybug below...
aimloe 3 months ago
The guy is not a scientist, he's a business man (a venture capitalist), and this is one big advertisement for his company. He is getting out his photo of a dying kid while he has probably traded grain futures in the past. I'm skeptical of his claims and his sincerity. I hope he is sincere about keeping people from starving to death and creating free energy, but all the evidence would point toward him and his mates finding a way to make free energy incredibly profitable....
aimloe 3 months ago 4
@aimloe That is because in our current state they need cash to fund and further advance the science behind it... some day when these and many other sciences are put into practical use they will pretty much make many jobs and things that people are employed to do obsolete... i wonder what will happen when the idea of money is finally irrelevant.
ckaiser1985K 1 month ago
Have a read of the Board friends. Chair is a Christian nutter who also sits on a bunch of think tank/charity boards, one of which promotes intelligent design... A number of guys tied up with Morgan Stanley & Goldman Sachs, Defence, Intelligence, CFO is ex-Arthur-Anderson... AND WAIT FOR IT... Majority interest is the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, the second largest producer of LNG in the US. I'd buy Greek bonds before giving them money. Someone tied up with Al Gore in there too. Green energy bubble?
aimloe 3 months ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
Of course, the biggest problem will always be effectively and efficiently mass producing this stuff. Fossil fuels proliferated before they were clean. Nuclear energy proliferated before it was safe. Solar energy proliferated before it was efficient. "Where is this stuff going to fall?" is the real question.
AFLoneWolf 3 months ago
It makes so much sense, let's do all of it now.
BooMonsterOfficial 3 months ago
Justin - where are you....! You came to Goa and disappear too fast.........please make us know how to contact you..........India has the money - the man power - the sun and the desperate need of every thing your teem of geniuses are discovering.
MARINA
marina.avatr@gmail.com
MARINAVATAR1 3 months ago
great idea, too avant garde, we have to wait for at least another several decades to even just make these applicable even just in a lab
billyboy8888 3 months ago
Yeah we need to develop this more and mass produce it. Like NOW!!! i hate how slow the world is becomming, afraid of change.
Typho0n86 3 months ago 4
If we could put our collective ego's to one side perhaps we could just make this happen. Thank you for your humanity
lewislewis66 3 months ago
Money is more important. I ,personally, can't make any money off this. If the choice is between the individual or the world, the individual will always fuck the world.
14users 3 months ago
@14users Can't make money off of this? The new devices in the forms of high technology, transportation, electronics, water purification and so on that would become possible due to this would be beyond count. If you cannot see money in that then please never go into venture capitalism.
TheTinySaint 3 months ago
what if global warming is a hoax and we create a better world for no reason ???
squeeks555 3 months ago
@squeeks555
then its still ganna be a better world
shpazshpaz 3 months ago
keep the picture of the starving kid in mind...and occupy the world
eatsimplefood 4 months ago
Anthropogenic global warming is a farce
samzydeco 4 months ago
Also I was annoyed by the way he's talking about electrical current, radiation doesn't produce electrons, it excites electrons so there's a current.
Not to mention that third world poverty and lack of water is due to governmental and political oppression, not from lack of technology or resources.
SuperFinGuy 4 months ago 2
The moment he started talking about global warming as if it was a scientific fact my red flags went up. As I suspected he never got to the point, how much energy a given panel of the material produces, compared to a normal photovoltaic one?! Sure it must be cheaper than a monocrystalline silicon panel, but how much efficient is it?!
SuperFinGuy 4 months ago
@SuperFinGuy Well, global warming is now admitted by a large majority of scientists all over the world.
DYLONayms 4 months ago
Comment removed
SuperFinGuy 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DYLONayms Sorry but science is not politics or a popularity contest.
SuperFinGuy 4 months ago
This man is not only a scientist, he is a humanitarian. I cringe at what Big Oil thinks of this. In my lifetime I would LOVE to see the madness end, while intelligent thought and progress like this, take root in our world.
kootenaylad 4 months ago
This guy is like a modern day alchemist. His fantasy window pane power plants are limited by the power provided by sunlight, which is sadly inadequate for our power demands. In other words, the amount of raw energy that falls upon your entire home isn't enough to power it.
Applest2oApples 4 months ago
@Applest2oApples However, the raw energy falling upon human infrastructure (cities, roads etc) is of many magnitudes greater than our energy needs!
Geo877 4 months ago
Comment removed
FoxvoxDK 4 months ago in playlist More videos from TEDtalksDirector
@Applest2oApples In other words, you're comically, completely wrong. Do you have any idea how much power is in sunlight? Maybe you should use your brain for a moment... how can someone today power their home by only covering half of their roof with solar cells with only 15-25% efficiency.
If you could capture all the power provided by the sunlight that falls on one house, you could power many houses. You just made an epic logic fail... I feel embarrassed for you.
tooosweeet 4 months ago
@tooosweeet Hehe, this reply you made to someone else I know. But please allow me to perhaps pique your interest in this little invention that has been around for many years, but was never used due to the 80's oil crisis and lack of funding, enjoy.
ing.dk/artikel/104139-saesonlagring-af-ubegraenset-solvarme-er-mulig-hvem-griber-chancen
Use google translate, if that does not satisfy, I will gladly translate words or sentences.
FoxvoxDK 4 months ago in playlist More videos from TEDtalksDirector
This has been flagged as spam show
@Applest2oApples Rofl xD. On a hot day, with a black roof absorbing some 10-15% of the heat from the sun, I can fry a damn egg and boil water. Don't believe me? Do this; take a black hose, if it's not black then paint it black, with a non-shiny paint, make it 20 meters long, put it in bright daylight, pump water through it and I dare you to stand under said water coming out :p
FoxvoxDK 4 months ago in playlist More videos from TEDtalksDirector 2
This has been flagged as spam show
WE need to build huge MIRROR in space that can give us a ONLY light NOT HEAT at night. So, that is how we can save some energy. Great video!
Sanjar10A7777 4 months ago
WE need to build huge MIRROR in space that can give us a ONLY light NOT HEAT at night. Do, that is how we can save some energy. Great video!
Sanjar10A7777 4 months ago
This very much looks like the big change, IF governments decide to think of the world population.
Its a shame that something like this will never happen when oil is around...
A big question for me is : Whats the production cost of all this?
vanakes 4 months ago 2
@vanakes Any start up costs would be enormous. It's in the 'longterm' savings that the benefits would occur. Once mass production and consumption occur, costs would eventually lower.
Creating a new infrastructure, disassembling the old one, and handling the surge of initial unemployment is another 'cost'.
It's daunting but not impossible. If we live to see it happen we'll also suffer through it as well. It's our children, possibly our grandchildren that would truly benefit from this change.
makeitgo 4 months ago
This... Is... Absolutly Amazing...
srgwarcock 4 months ago 3
0:15 thank me later
srgwarcock 4 months ago
Great, inspiring talk, but too much swooping. We love gratuitous powerpoint transitions, don't we?
wealthychef 4 months ago
41 American oil and gas company CEOs disliked this video.
ickybug 4 months ago 87
@ickybug One of the board members of Nanoholdings is a rep of the CEO of Chesapeake Energy bro.... Do some research.
aimloe 3 months ago
Comment removed
aimloe 3 months ago
Just to make that clear; One of the members of the Board of Directors of Nanoholdings (the company the guy above, Justin Hall, part owns, and the company that is patenting all of these great ideas so it can no doubt monopolize 'free energy') represents the CEO of Chesapeake Energy, the 2nd largest Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) producer in the US.... The perfect sell; ending poverty through free energy. Who could criticise a bloke selling that... Don't accept anything without using your brains first
aimloe 3 months ago 4
@aimloe
using my brain hurts
mellamosean 3 months ago
@ickybug The oil and gas CEO's are the biggest supporters of green energy technologies. They are the ones that fund this kind of research because they intend on dominating this market as well as the oil and gas markets.
TheTruthNothinMore 3 months ago 11
@TheTruthNothinMore I'm sorry but there is far more evidence of oil and gas companies suppressing alternative energy much more than supporting it. Feigning support was one way of killing the electric car.
No sensible energy company is going to support tech that gives people un-metered energy imo
daicon1v 1 month ago
@daicon1v They will if they can sell the tech, they can sell this tech. It would take many many gears to kill them anyway, no one is honestly afraid of that.
roflex2 3 weeks ago
@ickybug Now there is 51 republican who hate this video... and those brilliant ideas...
faustolg 3 months ago
Historians will refer to this video.
tcorp 4 months ago 55
41 dislikes? Are they suicidal?
tomfarr56 4 months ago 2
@tomfarr56 No, they know that their income will decrease and it's more important to them, than human lives.
Painfulldarksoul 4 months ago 2
most likely they are already utilizing some form of this technology concerning beaming microwaves to Earth.
Thanks for uploading this Very informative.
dbootsthediva 4 months ago
It sounds great. Where can I find a more detailed description abuot this?
batairoland 4 months ago
The water solution is already with us right *now* -
and it is not down to what scientists can do -
but to what Politicians *refuse* to do !
z1zaz 4 months ago 3
This is greatly inspirational - but there is a long history to the cover up of free energy - stretching back 100 years and more. One also needs a view of the "larger picture" to understand why the sort of technology that Justin Hall Tipping is developing has not been in general use already. Part of the reason that most are unaware of is that this sort of technology has already been developed, weaponised and used - Google Dr Judy Wood 9/11 and Free Energy.
checktheevidence 4 months ago
LOVE this idea
tommypolack 4 months ago
Yeah but how much money does this energy storing grid cost per household. If it's expensive as those solar panels, then most people will ignore it, never mind the rhetoric talk on imagination and wonders of what ifs' land.
TheJovanist 4 months ago
Waht can I do?
Heronite 4 months ago
I know one of the guy in audience.. I volunteered at his "NGO"! *ahem*
I like how Justin Hall thinks! :-)
TheYinful 4 months ago
If you do a YouTube search for Nanoholdings you will find more of Justin Hall-Tipping's videos
pzc59 4 months ago
I got slightly chocked up watching this! Fucking bravo that man, Make this man fucking President of the world NOW!!!!!
soulsanctuarymusic1 4 months ago
AMAZING!
soulsanctuarymusic1 4 months ago
I want to work with these people. I will do anything. I have a B.Sc in Mechanical Engineering. Please PM me with anything!
rayoc 4 months ago
mankind is not going to prevail, but evolve into a godlike being capable of immortalizing himself in this particular universe.
rlfulgham1 4 months ago
Can someone let me know where I can find a job building stuff like this?
rayoc 4 months ago
wow. inspirational stuff. I agree with the comments re the corporates' claws into our govts making any changes more difficult. time for a massive rethink eh?
LittleBabyBum 4 months ago
Brilliant.
heyitscaroline 4 months ago
this reminds me of the ZEITGEIST movement
arayia6girmay 4 months ago
godly
thaiQ1985 4 months ago
the last few lines justify the gravity of thought in this talk. Remarkable!
ANKS23 4 months ago
How much energy does the film produce? Unanswered.
Without knowing that the whole presentation is useless.
Hallibutbouy 4 months ago
@Hallibutbouy The conductor is 1000 times more conductive than copper, so in effect could collect solar energy up to 1000 times more efficiently than today's current solar panels.
soulsanctuarymusic1 4 months ago
@soulsanctuarymusic1 Copper has a static resistivity of 1.68*10E-8 ohm-meters. That is very conductive. 1000 times greater doesn't gain you much, and what does conductivity have to do with what he's talking about?
jgoemat 4 months ago
@jgoemat maybe if you read what i was replying to, you might get your answer
soulsanctuarymusic1 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@soulsanctuarymusic1 "collect solar energy up to 1000 times more efficiently" If using a superconductor instead of copper you probably wouldn't collect enough extra energy to be noticed. What does 1000 times greater mean in this context?
jgoemat 4 months ago
@soulsanctuarymusic1 Solar cells are not made of copper... They are made of semiconductors which produce the photovoltaic effect.
SuperFinGuy 4 months ago
@SuperFinGuy my bad, but whatever they are currently made of, i was trying to suggest that the more conductive the material, the more efficient they would be at absorbing solar energy. Or is that incorrect?
soulsanctuarymusic1 4 months ago
@soulsanctuarymusic1 Conductivity is important but what is most important is the photovoltaic effect of the material. You can have say a superconductor but it won't build an electric tension is it doesn't have a photovoltaic effect.
SuperFinGuy 4 months ago
free energy why don't we dump our entire national budget into this, you can't go wrong
harryman11 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ooooh, the electricity people won't like this.
BigBagsForRent 4 months ago
This is why science > religion.
gregory06 4 months ago
@gregory06 I like how you missed the point by a mile.
schustar322 4 months ago
@schustar322 The point? I know the point. It's to make this a better world. Religion is tearing it apart.. That's why science > religion
gregory06 4 months ago 4
@gregory06 seems to me that is comparing apples to oranges, science helps us live better/easier, where as religion in its best sense helps us act/behave better and offers an idea of what comes after death.
AwayFromTheWorld 4 months ago
@AwayFromTheWorld No, no it doesn't.
gregory06 4 months ago
@AwayFromTheWorld I act/behavior better without a religion than most do WITH a religion, so whats the point of religion again?
davenslice 4 months ago
...but we need a government smart grid to control and watch you!
NerdCityLiving 4 months ago
Fantastic speech.
kaakoo 4 months ago 2
Nikola Tesla did better than this.
depro9 4 months ago
@depro9 Nikola Tesla was a clever man, but, even if he did better, we are not able to benefit from his free power if it even existed in the end.
This is real, and also possible.
fireinthemountains 4 months ago
@fireinthemountains are you seriously questioning Dr Tesla!? To his dying day he said it was possible to implement his world system only it would cost a bit of money & will of those in power. This system proposed by Hall is a red herring.
depro9 4 months ago
@depro9 I agree with this statement. It is seemingly the will of corporations to crush innovation over profits. So, the will will have to come from somewhere not guarded by selfishness. The money likewise.
It is unfair to call this a red herring, but perhaps it is overstated. It is hard to see how all of our electricity can come from surrounding solar light, when this is of less energy than is needed to power devices of varying sorts.
It could still help though. 1 kW less is still 1 kW
fireinthemountains 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@fireinthemountains The conductor is 1000 times more conductive than copper, so in effect could collect solar energy up to 1000 times more efficiently than today's current solar panels.
soulsanctuarymusic1 4 months ago
I just love the rhythm of his speaking. Really efficient.
Aukikco 4 months ago 3
don't think the energy crops would allow this :(
Mikemaladar 4 months ago
wow !!!! so good
thaiQ1985 4 months ago in playlist thaiQ1985's favorites
WOW
Cridec 4 months ago
"The power-plant of tomorrow is no power-plant" [Pause for applause.] .... crickets
TZCoder 4 months ago 20
@BadMothafrakker187 HAHAHAHAHA sinner xD
elosky 4 months ago
@BadMothafrakker187 God I hope you are joking...
J10L12K11 4 months ago
this dude could be talking about a tits powered telekinetic plasma screen video game system with quantum rocket launchers and stealth pineapple, and it would still put me to sleep.
pacman529 4 months ago
39 people are oil tycoons.
RazsterTW 4 months ago 3
6:20 - "the total width of it is six hundred times smaller than the width of a decimal place."
This sentence is retarded.
BornAgainEngineer 4 months ago
Comment removed
234234234werrrrrrr 4 months ago
its not like this carbon isotope is new though, I think it won the nobel prize last year.
SamieOld 4 months ago
@SamieOld its not an isotope. what you mean is allotrope. the carbon nanotubes he refers to were not the subject of last years Nobel - that was graphene. carbon nanotubes were discovered shortly after "fullerenes" ....C60 (buckyballs) & the like
bucksynthesis 4 months ago
Hey Assholes at 10:17! What's so fucking funny?
jarthos123 4 months ago 41
@jarthos123 That looks suspiciously like Stefan Sagmeister, designer extraordinaire. Anyone else?
phillygee 4 months ago
@jarthos123 they know what he is saying is bullshit! Tesla said we could pull water from the atmosphere cheap & easily using only electricity. They do this in Abu Dhabi to make it rain now & then.
depro9 4 months ago
I clapped when he was done..
SuperAquamale 4 months ago
Where can I buy stock in this man's company??
InuvikPhil 4 months ago
One of the best ever TED talks.
Coolworldleaderguy 4 months ago in playlist Videos from TEDtalksDirector 3
@kei87 lol.. true..
willyoldfox 4 months ago
don't inhale these windows for the love of god
tmzilla 4 months ago
I had to stop after the first two minutes were complete bullshit. Has this guy never even thought about remedial statistics? The fact that an event can take 50-100 years to recover from does not mean that it's abnormal, it could very well mean that it is an event that normally happens once or twice every hundred years! I fully accept AGW, but he is still a crank.
opcn18 4 months ago
@opcn18 Whether that's a fact or not, he was merely establishing a point about what we perceive as 'normal' and by no means did he base the rest of the talk on it, you missed an eye opening speech and should put that small error to one side and watch the whole thing. I honestly can't wait for the day this technology becomes viable and is widely used
xSkitZx 4 months ago
@xSkitZx ? He has injected false information and used it to reach a false conclusion and that false conclusion is the basis of his appeal. That's not something you brush off.
opcn18 4 months ago
@opcn18 How to stunningly miss the point you moron!
soulsanctuarymusic1 4 months ago
@soulsanctuarymusic1 Yes calling me a moron makes you sound so much more correct.
I didn't miss the poitn, I just didn't address it because it is irrelevant to the concern I raised, that's a point that you missed. No matter what he is arguing for when he presents bull like the first two minutes of his talk he should be called out on it. Nothing excuses injecting false information into your argument.
opcn18 4 months ago
@opcn18 It wasn't bull, you interpretation is just wrong.
soulsanctuarymusic1 4 months ago
@soulsanctuarymusic1 go back to your bridge troll.
opcn18 4 months ago
hes speaking too slowly
violet156 4 months ago
wow, I started clapped at the end, till i realized i was staring at a computer screen.
dravarian26 4 months ago in playlist More videos from TEDtalksDirector
Batman's night vision contacts! Hell yeah!
stevecav1138 4 months ago
Being all things are manipulated(silly humans), the freeing energy, must come down to a mfg. capability ro the same as a small buisness, this is where pricing stays low due to over participation. Get the process down to where 50K$ can set up a Carbon Vaporizer for deposition and then there will be no 20 years for ROI, no interest for GE to try to contain the buisness.
drmaddogs2u 4 months ago
I'm in. Sign me up.
sphinxart 4 months ago 3
General Electric, 3-M, Duke Energy and southern Electric will assure the pricing will include a ROI only after 20 year, effectivley, eliminating a water starved child in Africa from participating. "Too difficult, too expensive".. and now they are going to give it away? No. Consumers will care less whether Coal or NG or Carbon tubes deliver the "Electron".. and they will be charged for it, inproportions comprable to Coal, NG and grid supplied "Electrons".
drmaddogs2u 4 months ago
@BurnsRubber go on
644tad 4 months ago