Maria Elena Bautista Horn - Part 7- The Bottomline

[adiksadiatabs]

JC Tejano and Mrs. Horn: who's the better spokesperson :D?

[patnubay]

JC Tejano, it's not enough that you believe that CGMA is guilty, it should be proven beyond reasonable doubt! As they say, it is better to set a guilty man free rather than to put to jail an innocent man! Haaaay!!!! Sumama ka na lang sa Student Council ni Noynoy!!!!!

[67Mannheim]

Borja is missing the point. Pnoy doesn't just need a good spokesperson. Pnoy needs to stand on solid principles so that his people will not get entangled in the process of maneuvering with their arguments.

[67Mannheim]

Pag na sa tama ka, you can answer the questions without being inconsistent.

[67Mannheim]

If you already have a bias, you will miss the truth.

[SpaceAudio]

this lady (horn) is probably a hundred times better than the government's communication group. they look so super dumb and stupid.

[krizyf]

I like the way Elena Horn answer the question and I agree with Mike Lopez that she is a blessing that the Aquino Government is yet to received but para sa akin after Arroyo is well then panagutan nya ang mga kasalanan nya.

[gerzonx]

i like Ms. Elena Bautista Horn...

[ansj64]

This president sitting now does not know that he does not know what he is doing..hence all the kabobohan is showing.

[MrJEIAR18]

i Like her so much! NOW i UNDERSTAND that ex. president Gloria Macapagal Arroyo needs to put some medical attention for her. Because each and everyone needs to have a freewill based on the maslow's hierarchy of need's on the 2nd Level it portrays about the SECURITY NEEDS and under of security need's is to secure your Life! in this issue she want to cure the disease of PGMA 1st! before they want to face all the hanging cases! she's so very Blessed to have this kind of FRIEND!

[pilder3]

JC Tejano should read and comprehend the Bill of Rights.

Article III

Section 1: No person shall be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor shall any person be denied the equal protection of the laws.

Section 4. No law shall be passed abridging the freedom of speech, of expression, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble and petition the government for redress of grievances.

Although you didn't understand sec 1 I will give you section 4

[umalipaolo]

warning: just watch the videos except 1 and 7 because its a waste of your time

[r13680]

JC Tejano, bago ka mamaratang na guilty si Arroyo, illegal si Corona, illegal ang ganito, illegal ang ganyan, pakitapon mo muna ang mga pirated DVDs, CDs, mga pekeng alahas mo, relo, damit, at brief mo. Kung makapagsalita ka, para kung sino kang legal expert at law abiding citizen. Ipokritoh!!!

[anewjeric]

Len Bautista is so eloquent, I admire her for being so consistent and loyal. I just hope that this administration has this kind of spoke person as well. I'm not a pro GMA and not a pro PNoy as well since I never voted them for the past elections. What I can say is we all have the rights, and if GMA will not be treated ASAP, how can she face all the charges? She's not yet guilty because nothing has proven yet. DOJ Sec deLima, should be disBAR for not following the SC decision.

[mackz214]

the thing is cleve insisted bakit ndi na raw kasahunan ni EXPGMA??? ni Pnoy??? if the had strong evidence cgoro naka kulong na si gma ngaun... the face is can convicted a person instantly without showing any prof at all?? in that case they are just exercising power!!!!

[doggoneson]

This video only shows how ignorant our young people are on their basic rights as aitizens and on the constituition itself. Take for example that the young man who declared GMA as guilty. How can she say that when no case had been filed aginst her during that time. Where is presumption of innocence here.

[r13680]

Sana si Elena Horn na lang ang naging spokesperson ni peaNoy at hindi ang conceited na si Valte.

[r13680]

Kayong mga nangangalandakan na magnanakaw si Gloria, magnanakaw si ganito si ganyan, illegal o unconstitutional ang TRO ng supreme court, pakitapon nyo muna ang mga pirated CDs at DVDs at lahat na mga imitation at pekeng mga alahas, relo, damit, brief, at panty ninyo. Kung magsalita kayo para kayong kung sinong legal experts at mga law-abiding citizens. Mga ipokrito!!!

[gmdimaano]

JC Tejano bobo. Nagmamarunong, di naman abugado. Corona, midnight appointee raw, that has been settled by the SC already. GMA guilty daw. Proven in court? Not. JC Tejano = utak weng weng.

[fRitZiAn007]

Cleve, were you even listening to miss Horn? lol. Baka nga walang probable cause kaya walang kasong nakasampa. hahahaha!

[clidesvi]

anong ginagawa ni pacquiao dyan

[wyredbyG]

Boy asked: do you think that GMA is guilty in a certain sense? And that guy JC Tejano answers. Yes. Now, what I'd like to know...how did he know that she is indeed guilty? Where are the proofs, the evidence? Is GMA convicted already? This is one reason why kaya magulo sa Pilipinas ngayon. We cannot presume one is guilty unless proven in court. That is a right of every individual.

[sonyuhjuniorlol]

@wyredbyG true because our politicians are brainwashing them to hate GMA . Instead of gathering eveidences against the former president, they are busy spreading rumors. Yun kasi mabenta sa mga di nag iisip. mahilig sa telenobela.

[utoohart]

@wyredbyG

+1.

galing nyo ser.! na sapul nyo po..

[khazaffable]

@wyredbyG hindi naman cguro cinonfirm ni JC na guilty talaga si dating PGMA, ang sa kanya lang, "convinced" cya, in his personal opinion, na oo guilty nga...

[wyredbyG]

@khazaffable Of course, he cannot confirm it because again, there are no evidences.There was no trial in court yet. How did he get into that position na convinced sya na guilty nga si GMA? Because of the media? GMA's so-called guilt is because of the trial by publicity that we Filipinos are so fond of. I'm not in any way defending GMA because i myself want to know if she is guilty without a doubt. And we can only do that by sticking to due process.

[wyredbyG]

@khazaffable What is happening in the Philippines right now is we convict a person guilty unless proven innocent in court. That is wrong! It's unconstitutional. Each and everyone deserves to be give the benefit of the doubt. What is the court for if we cannot do that.