@diokiller132 you say that but till you get hacked. lol Truth be told windows xp was great to, but it also got hacked a lot, though windows 7 and on been pretty good, a good operating system doesn't mean much if its only good at just starting up, just saying, good for its time but not for in present time, but other wise your right it does rock for back when it was still relevant.
heck yes! windows 95/98 for the win. the visuals were better in the 90's, and a computer with a few megabytes of ram screamed, and now to do anything really, you've got to have at least 2 gigs or more.
I have an Asus laptop with Intel Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition Sandy Bridge-E 3.3GHz (3.9GHz Turbo) LGA 2011 130W Six-Core Desktop Processor BX80619i73960X, 12 GB of ram, 5 TB of HD and a AMD Radeon HD 7970 HD 7970 3GB GDDR5 925 MHz.
The problem that all O/S develop over time is SOFTWARE BLOAT.
It comes from 1. Software you don't need. 2. Spyware& Viruses 3. O/S updates to counter said spyware and virus. 4. Ram that is over full because of all of the above. To get away from this
you need a clean fresh start from time to time. The lesson is: A clean lean O/S is best.
Keeping your O/S free of junk will make it run happier longer. Don't buy junk you don't need.
Microsoft has been supporting legacy software for years .
Win 95 have 100 times less memory and files to eat than Win7 Ultimate, depends what setting u set/use, Linux can start on 2.73 seconds from button touch (shut down to screen) :D
Ah, I love how my WIndows 95 desktop and laptops start up and run faster than my ME desktop, my XP and 7 desktops, and my Vista laptop, and on a bad day, even my iPod.
@andrei13mo yes the os load more shit The fact is CPU is 10 time faster ( as memory and drive) but the whole process is slower, the main task of Windows and other software is to check there own licenses instead of just run
Boot time means nothing. It makes more sense the new computer boot slower, more drivers and programs to load, more complex GUIs and systems, security, etc etc etc
anyone still playing with Win M.E? now that was bullshit! lol get 2K on there way better than 98. Also, this is an unfair test, need similar hardware..
Ok, ok, 95 boots fast... I assume the fact that you can only run some old word processor, old games, and that almost every web browser compatible with it will not be able to display 95% of webpages correctly, is of small concern...
windows 95 is faster at startup but windows 7 is capable of handling more files and it is the recommended system to play top tier games not windows 95.
@Weegeeisgoingtokillm thats not true, xp is a very good version but 7 also is. first i thought i would never get used to, only took me about 3 days and once you're used to it it works beter then xp, mostly because you have more opinions and it works alot faster, what is true that many software is still running on xp but thats why you can run xp on your windows 7 pc if you have ultimate
Windows 95 first edition had ~ 50 MB with every option installed.
Windows 95c had ~ 150 mb with everything installed.
In contrast, i have never seen a routine install of Win7 that was below 10 GB right after install, it's closer to 15 GB most of the time.
So tell me, how is it any surprise that you can boot an OS that is roughly 100 to 300 times smaller faster on a computer thats only rougly 20 times slower then the other
yeah,why 7 is slower,because it has an interface,a lot of programes.and i can't understand,how the persons and now can compare 7 with 98 or 2000. it's stupid. so with you like that,use a 98 till now,if you are so sure that it is better))))
Linux is even more complex than Windows 7 if you run a lot of Server Services with a fully blown 3D GUI and it still boots faster than Windows 95, so that is no reason.
@NFMandNFSfan i was not talking about the kernel that windows 95 carried or what windows 7 carried. i was talking about the release name. 95 is a bigger number than 7 so 95 of course should be better lol. well if your talking about kernel then yes windows has a bigger kernel number. windows has not used a kernel number since the release of 3.11 of windblows
@plzdonhack yeah but still windows 95 booted up like 20 secs before windows 7 and there was only like one second between turning them both on so 95 boots faster end of story
why dont you ACTUALLY try to do it on the same computers
The test was not fair
Baldygaluk2000ROBLOX 3 days ago
windows 95...........faster.XD
99ramoss 3 days ago
you have to kick the laptop on the left side.... sucks
hooliganeagle84 1 week ago
windows 95 kicks ass
diokiller132 1 week ago
@diokiller132 you say that but till you get hacked. lol Truth be told windows xp was great to, but it also got hacked a lot, though windows 7 and on been pretty good, a good operating system doesn't mean much if its only good at just starting up, just saying, good for its time but not for in present time, but other wise your right it does rock for back when it was still relevant.
codehackerzane 1 week ago
@diokiller132 not
Baldygaluk2000ROBLOX 3 days ago
The is a fake!
dergtafan 1 week ago
@dergtafan Yeah, yeah, another stupid comment :/
volken1991 1 week ago 13
heck yes! windows 95/98 for the win. the visuals were better in the 90's, and a computer with a few megabytes of ram screamed, and now to do anything really, you've got to have at least 2 gigs or more.
d3xter11 2 weeks ago
@d3xter11 the times move on!!!
Baldygaluk2000ROBLOX 3 days ago
@Baldygaluk2000ROBLOX god
Baldygaluk2000ROBLOX 3 days ago
Windows 95 FTW
SuperMetroid555 2 weeks ago 2
I have an Asus laptop with Intel Core i7-3960X Extreme Edition Sandy Bridge-E 3.3GHz (3.9GHz Turbo) LGA 2011 130W Six-Core Desktop Processor BX80619i73960X, 12 GB of ram, 5 TB of HD and a AMD Radeon HD 7970 HD 7970 3GB GDDR5 925 MHz.
Price: $2099.90
KegPatcha 2 weeks ago
I saw but up of Win 98 on 80GB HDD and 266Mhz system. It took more time to make self test than loading OS
leszken 2 weeks ago
my windows 43 works better than both :P xD
in2this11 2 weeks ago
nic dziwnego Stare systemy mało nowości-szybkie
515lis 2 weeks ago
The problem that all O/S develop over time is SOFTWARE BLOAT.
It comes from 1. Software you don't need. 2. Spyware& Viruses 3. O/S updates to counter said spyware and virus. 4. Ram that is over full because of all of the above. To get away from this
you need a clean fresh start from time to time. The lesson is: A clean lean O/S is best.
Keeping your O/S free of junk will make it run happier longer. Don't buy junk you don't need.
Microsoft has been supporting legacy software for years .
williamseet 2 weeks ago
Win 95 have 100 times less memory and files to eat than Win7 Ultimate, depends what setting u set/use, Linux can start on 2.73 seconds from button touch (shut down to screen) :D
Cipirano 3 weeks ago
windows 95 <3
nekosama23 3 weeks ago 3
@nekosama23 love is win 95 win 95 is the best win of word
joaoreisful 3 weeks ago
HOW THE HECK IS 256MB COMPATIBLE WITH 200MHZ?O_o
eivis13 4 weeks ago
I know why Windows 95 is faster, because Windows 7 has more things to load and Windows 95 doesn't because it has less things to load.
coolapple14 4 weeks ago
@coolapple14 yes but on old laptop was slower all HW many times
MrRomanCZE 3 weeks ago
dual xeons in a laptop???
benzbubblecat 1 month ago
Shit guys! Im switching to Windows 95! Fuck this new Windows 7 shit!
murder00redrum 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
be a pro like me, clear your startup programs using run > type 'msconfig' > and clear checkboxes on 'startup' tab
then be even more pro by using hibernate instead of shutting down
own life my friend, pro yourself up ^_^
HuamiLim 1 month ago
Ah, I love how my WIndows 95 desktop and laptops start up and run faster than my ME desktop, my XP and 7 desktops, and my Vista laptop, and on a bad day, even my iPod.
NerdOnTheStreet 1 month ago
thats because 95 is simpler so less effort to load
MrRubear2 1 month ago
Because intel xeons are REALLY SHIT! ive got intel xeon quad core pc 3,6ghz bloody hell thats sooooo slow! trust me.
DanceToTheRhythmXD 1 month ago
Windows 95 own Windows 7.
SuperPadde123 1 month ago
Why do you ask obviously the Win95 is better!
CriadorDeCriaturas 1 month ago
just add SSD drive for the new laptop and wat was there to load for window 95...notepad?.....but PACMAN was awesome
EvoMitsubishiLancer 1 month ago
lol windows 95 ftw!
ndog37 1 month ago
my PC boots up in 7 sec. and that is windows 7 ultimate. but i have SSD.
enylive 1 month ago
@enylive -.-!
LightMusicK 1 month ago
I would prefer ms dos lol
cr7thebestable 1 month ago
i like how it booted faster
Solitude108 1 month ago
My Toyota starts quicker than both of these....haha!!....but my toaster takes longer to toast bread...sigh!!!!
skaczkurkin 1 month ago
@andrei13mo yes the os load more shit The fact is CPU is 10 time faster ( as memory and drive) but the whole process is slower, the main task of Windows and other software is to check there own licenses instead of just run
lalapubpub 1 month ago
@andrei13mo It's Windows 95 not Windows 98. If you don't like this video just don't watch ! What a people...
volken1991 1 month ago
@volken1991 Well, maybe I'm being literal, but how do you know you don't like a video if you don't watch it first?
travelsonic 1 month ago
what was there to load in the 1900s??????
Toffer161 1 month ago
Boot time means nothing. It makes more sense the new computer boot slower, more drivers and programs to load, more complex GUIs and systems, security, etc etc etc
rockoman100 1 month ago
anyone still playing with Win M.E? now that was bullshit! lol get 2K on there way better than 98. Also, this is an unfair test, need similar hardware..
Tubz101 1 month ago 3
@Tubz101 Windows 2000 runs too slow on that Sony Vaio.
volken1991 1 month ago 4
@Tubz101 95 would win on that
ttyyuu12345 1 month ago
@Tubz101 They don't need similar hardware, they're both running on hardware they were made for.
MorkaGraven 1 week ago
@Tubz101 No they don't. They both need hardware that is typical to the OS's release time.
fubecafy 4 days ago
@markssenoga ... But less capacities ...
MrJotOER 1 month ago
windows 98se used to rock, then they started to not support it which sucked cause I found it was way faster and games looked awesome on it.
1112223333111 1 month ago
@1112223333111 Windows 95 was quite stable... Win98 was true bullshit. Allways bluescreens and shit...
MrGermanBratwurst 1 month ago
@MrGermanBratwurst yes your right, I think they did this on purpose so we switched.
1112223333111 1 month ago
o.o not gonna say anything...
marioland327 1 month ago
its like comparing a macbook pro to a calculator or like a burger to vegies
D0UI3LEA 1 month ago
Pro gaming computers load faster.95 has low mega bytes.
xXMy3DSXx 1 month ago
@markssenoga thats true
AzimSobri 2 months ago
nice!
StarWarsMG 2 months ago
what!
brokeniphone2 2 months ago
i only like Windows Vista
ncala 2 months ago
¡windows 95 is shit!
STALKER98able 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Windows XP beats all
Bo0Mhe4d5hOT 2 months ago
Comment removed
Bo0Mhe4d5hOT 2 months ago
replace windows 7 with windows 95. see how fast that boots up. i think it'd be pretty fast.
00idonthaveaname00 2 months ago
windows 95 would obviously boot faster...it has lower system requirements.
00idonthaveaname00 2 months ago
Ok, ok, 95 boots fast... I assume the fact that you can only run some old word processor, old games, and that almost every web browser compatible with it will not be able to display 95% of webpages correctly, is of small concern...
BilisNegra 2 months ago
12gb vs 2gb system files
afieqM 2 months ago
yes WINDOWS 95 was always better than mac or other OS
alex1994iscool 2 months ago
im gunna chuck mah windows 7 out of mah window and install windows 95 cuz its fukin awesome
DollsandaLotMore 2 months ago
windows 95 is faster at startup but windows 7 is capable of handling more files and it is the recommended system to play top tier games not windows 95.
Badzinger 2 months ago
ram? hardisk
coxx303 2 months ago
@coxx303 Read DESCRIPTION
volken1991 2 months ago 16
@volken1991 Windows 95 kicked ass idc what anyone else says.
scarface12347 1 month ago
In some ways the old stuff was better. It worked or it didn't - you didn't waste months faffing about with it :)
2JAMMY 2 months ago
windows 7 just got owned!
idellhpcompaq 2 months ago
how many gigabytes that hard disk has on old laptop??????
gocountry1391 2 months ago
@gocountry1391 Read description please
volken1991 2 months ago 6
@volken1991 oh thanks
gocountry1391 2 months ago
Comment removed
erickcartman1994 2 months ago
95 wins lol
cr7thebestable 2 months ago
buajajajajaja ese windows 7 U es una desonrra para windows 7 ultimate, Le gano w95 buajajajajajaja
josephmen11 2 months ago
95 kicked 7's ass
TheHaloman980 2 months ago
yani win 95 daha hizli mi calisiyor
salim2641 2 months ago
@salim2641 Hayır Win 7 Hızlı İşlemciye Göre Win 95 Yavaş İşlemciye Göre Yapılmış
Win 7'yi Hızlı İşlemciyle Çalıştırırsan Normal Win 95'i Hızlı İşlemciyle Çalıştırırsan Çok Hızlı Olur
atikonium 2 months ago
aff o win7 demora pra kct pra inicia
mcrafafitafox 2 months ago
Win 2000 was the best and perhaps only system created by Microsoft.
rokaiser1980 2 months ago
Windows 95 WIN!!!!
SrDavidRuiz 2 months ago
i cant believe it..win 95 is much faster
radwint19 2 months ago
os laptops são demarcass diferentes mais o win98 é melhor
victorpmouinha 2 months ago
well i do not know how a windows 7 ultimate is so so but i have home premium and its way faster it takes 25 sec. to start
austin90015437 2 months ago
WOW!!!! The windows 95 computer is quick :-)
matthew65536 2 months ago
Windows 9x is always faster since it's a shitload of crap compared to any other recent OS.
1st of I don't believe you have enabled networking on Win95.
2nd the Win7 would be able to do sleep mode, while Win95 has got almost no power settings
3rd this list goes on and on and on.
If you wan't fast and reliable (Not win9x, which is unreliable shit)
AND all features available on the market.
Go download Linux and learn a little about gr8 computing.
Mantua64 2 months ago
WINDOWS 7 SUCKS
juanpablo6toon 2 months ago
@juanpablo6toon Yyes both 95 and 7 sucks XP FTW.
Weegeeisgoingtokillm 2 months ago
@Weegeeisgoingtokillm Do not understand anything ¬¬
juanpablo6toon 2 months ago
@juanpablo6toon Both windows 95 and windows 7 sucks XP is better than both of them, mostly 95.
Weegeeisgoingtokillm 2 months ago
@Weegeeisgoingtokillm thats not true, xp is a very good version but 7 also is. first i thought i would never get used to, only took me about 3 days and once you're used to it it works beter then xp, mostly because you have more opinions and it works alot faster, what is true that many software is still running on xp but thats why you can run xp on your windows 7 pc if you have ultimate
bosaap10 2 months ago
Wait, your windows 7 what version is?
-Starter
-Home Basic
-Home Premium
-Enterprise
-Professional
-Ultimate
If your Windows 7 no start more faster than Windows 95, it's other version or it's the ultimate version?????
WenaxBkn310 2 months ago
@WenaxBkn310 ...Did you even read the title?
Grandbigdog24 2 months ago
@Grandbigdog24 OH! crap
WenaxBkn310 2 months ago
I don't see anything suprising here at all.
Windows 95 first edition had ~ 50 MB with every option installed.
Windows 95c had ~ 150 mb with everything installed.
In contrast, i have never seen a routine install of Win7 that was below 10 GB right after install, it's closer to 15 GB most of the time.
So tell me, how is it any surprise that you can boot an OS that is roughly 100 to 300 times smaller faster on a computer thats only rougly 20 times slower then the other
0ptimismPrime 2 months ago
he probly installed windows 95
TheKathleen42 2 months ago
Win 95 FTW
HassanMirza199O 2 months ago
wait..... 95 in a laptop?!!!!!!!
how the hell is that possible?
erickcartman1994 3 months ago
@erickcartman1994 Why do you think it is impossible ?
volken1991 2 months ago
@volken1991 ok the 95 machine looks like an new machine like 2006 -now
windows xp can´t be installed in a laptop with the original CD from microsoft
or your machine it´s very but very old ?
erickcartman1994 2 months ago
@erickcartman1994 Sony Vaio looks like new but it has almost 13 years :)
volken1991 2 months ago
@volken1991 outstanding!!!!
that machine haves a good maintenance
i have a super nintendo the 2nd console from nintendo and it works perfectly
an that vodeo game system is 20 years old :)
erickcartman1994 2 months ago
@erickcartman1994
Windows 95 image, burnt to disk, installed on laptop? Or if you're old school, then use some floppy disks (the not so floppy kind) and do it up.
bobusboy 2 months ago
@erickcartman1994 when you install windows 95 on an old laptop select portable in stead of typical. DUH!
matthew65536 2 months ago
@erickcartman1994 windows 95 is very possible on a laptop, i have a laptop that was designed for windows 95
Gatewayuser200 2 months ago
@erickcartman1994
you probably don't know shit about computer :D
am i right?
pufixas 2 months ago
Comment removed
erickcartman1994 2 months ago
In 10 years the Windows 7 is crap :P
Jerbod2 3 months ago
@Jerbod2 mah boi, you can download windows developer preview
a pre-beta of windows 8 from the official site
erickcartman1994 2 months ago
@erickcartman1994 Just saying that in 10 years Windows 7 will look like crap compared to what we have then.
Jerbod2 2 months ago
my computer starts before i even turn it on
TraitorBagel 3 months ago
@ArqHarry
x ke nO PuEDEZ EZCRYVIR VIen????
ElColombianGuy 3 months ago
This is like comparing Eminem with Justin Bieber
PrinceNaiminemMarsII 3 months ago
You can better run this test with a clean system and no password!
bastiaan170 3 months ago
Windows 95 rulez!
Miezmausmau 3 months ago
Windows 95 wins!
lol2000hee 3 months ago
tbm não tinha nada no 95 rsrsrsrs
EGRINFORMATICA 3 months ago
windows 7 takes 3-4GB of space and 95 takes 500mb
bumps123456789 3 months ago
I miss Windows95
seblunder 3 months ago
I like the classic look of the Sony running Win95.
XBLChubbySkunk 3 months ago
THIS IS A UNFAIR TEST BECAUSE WINDOWS 7 BOOTING IS FAST BUT WINDOWS 95 IS SLOWY BUT WINDOWS 95 IS ON FIRST THAN WIN7
Alif40Nizar 3 months ago
and now windows 8 tablet vs this
newking12498 3 months ago
win95 win!! no gpu
MrNeowarrior 3 months ago
he uses win 7 more so he has install apps on the 7
asdfg12345QW456 3 months ago
Win95 4 LIFE !!!
MCLenny187 3 months ago
well you was winner windows 95 is faster
elsantoglitch 3 months ago
put a solid state drive, u see win7 flies
vamjok 3 months ago
we all know that windows 95 has more faster boot
also we all know that windows 95 stinks! Because of its ugly appearance yuk!
So classic And windows 7 has more faster gaming experience Than windows 95
try running angry birds on windows 95! maybe it'll explode. because of it's stinking software eeeww!
But we shall respect what is older than us!! but i'am telling you its really ugly
VERY VERY UGLY!!!
WorldOfNetbook4796 3 months ago
i don't believe that somebody has still have windows 95. LOL
WorldOfNetbook4796 3 months ago
wooah awesome! I'll go back to Win 95 :P
lol guys... don't take this serious ^^ yea it is a stupid comparison... and? ^^° where's the problem. we all know it.
Ultravore1 3 months ago
WTF Microsoft.Proclaiming that IE is installed in Win95 on The Boot Screen
nhking4 3 months ago
what the hell is wrong with your Win 7 notebook!? that's way too long.
sierra3daction 3 months ago
@THEshar3 and my computer with win 7 starts in 8 secs lol
max88816 4 months ago
Comparing 7 to 95? That's just plain stupid. Windows 7 would OWN!!!
Reaper081087 4 months ago
yeah,why 7 is slower,because it has an interface,a lot of programes.and i can't understand,how the persons and now can compare 7 with 98 or 2000. it's stupid. so with you like that,use a 98 till now,if you are so sure that it is better))))
MrSexerTube 4 months ago
windows 7 is more complex than windows 95 thats why it takes longer to boot
NFMandNFSfan 4 months ago
@NFMandNFSfan
Linux is even more complex than Windows 7 if you run a lot of Server Services with a fully blown 3D GUI and it still boots faster than Windows 95, so that is no reason.
Vamp898 4 months ago
Lol look windows 7 has more files on it and try put windows 7 on that it will fail during insulation ha
doom3023 4 months ago
Obviously, Win98 is faster.
KiddingSpree 4 months ago
meu windows 7 não demora tanto assim pra liga não
LEOZIMK 4 months ago
Anyway, BIOS of your Win7 laptop was faster than the Win 95 one, but it really doesn't matter...
ShadyGamerX 4 months ago
where do i get this windows 95 its a bigger number than seven so it must be better right.
goochbuntu 4 months ago
@goochbuntu
oh yeah, windows 95 is approximately 13 times better than windows 7 : D
MisterNogas 4 months ago
@MisterNogas i agree lolz
goochbuntu 4 months ago
@goochbuntu no its windows 4.0 while windows 7 is windows 6.1.
NFMandNFSfan 4 months ago
@NFMandNFSfan i was not talking about the kernel that windows 95 carried or what windows 7 carried. i was talking about the release name. 95 is a bigger number than 7 so 95 of course should be better lol. well if your talking about kernel then yes windows has a bigger kernel number. windows has not used a kernel number since the release of 3.11 of windblows
goochbuntu 4 months ago
@MehmetheShow Read annotations before posting stupid comments
volken1991 4 months ago
The only reason 95 started faster is because 95 is too sucky to spend time doing things. :D :D :D :D :D :D :D
clickaroni 4 months ago
7 sucks. I'm not saying that because of this video, it's because the OS sucks.
AKSoapy29 4 months ago
@AKSoapy29 Verdade os sistemas de seguraça dele é muito rigido demora mais de meia hora pra baixa um jogo em quanto no XP demora menos de 15 min.
LEOZIMK 4 months ago
95 shit
Joonasbr0 4 months ago
WTF?
minikristianX 4 months ago
Sony ;)
KaXDrix 5 months ago
The quality of operating system is not in the boot speed ;D
JRigals 5 months ago
Epic wins
rockband905 5 months ago 2
what would you expect? wait why am i watching this?
Luigi2011SM64 5 months ago
Face it the modern day windows operating systems take alot longer to load up.
dalinuxnerd 5 months ago
windows 7 was slower cause it windows 7 it take a bit time than other windows
MrZeyad008 5 months ago
The difference is obvious - Windows 95 is much more efficient.
gameking008 5 months ago
oke WTF
computergenie1 6 months ago
@THEshar3 its a boot feature that let u boot in few secs or something like that
bilcza 6 months ago
windows sewen victory
SuperGamer902 6 months ago
their diffrent laptops... with completely different specs... i mean common
ZapperTheHedgehog45 6 months ago
what a noob!!!!
magikshot 6 months ago
u boot sony 1st , then only u boot asus...
plzdonhack 7 months ago
@plzdonhack yeah but still windows 95 booted up like 20 secs before windows 7 and there was only like one second between turning them both on so 95 boots faster end of story
chimpygamer 6 months ago
@THEshar3 not impossible at all.... maybe he has an i7 2600k or idk... sandy bridge
adamzoubi555 8 months ago
Of course Windows 95 will boot first, it's a more clean and efficient OS.
Windows 7 is bulky, and bloatware in my opinion. I stick to XP Pro.
danagol1985 8 months ago
wtf
MsVoragine 8 months ago
im a pc and windows 95 is MY idea
Mita6ki365 8 months ago