Added: 4 years ago
From: 911MmRy
Views: 8,369
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (56)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Last three words he sayed... just horrifying

  • So you think if there was explosions in other floors inside that hell, Cosgrove would hear them, see their flashes and talk about it in his last second? ... ¬¬ ...

    Please... XD

  • the schemers thought that they would benefit from this conspiracy. but they disregard the fact that God is with the oppressed. their scheme resulted in loss of prestige of the usa and led to economic crisis instead of economic gains. it broke the american dream of people overseas. global economic motion tends to stay in the other side of the world now, unfortunately americans are going to lose the right to say that they are the greatest country of the world by 2020 or so.. Fuck responsibles!!

  • Some logic should be applied. What purpose would there be for the American government to destroy the property? Considering the costs associated, everywhere from cleanup of the site to the families that were paid for their losses, it's rather expensive. It would be hard to honestly keep such a secret. However, manufacturing "worst case scenarios" because we don't have actual information is dishonest. If someone doesn't truly know what happened, they can't really talk about it honestly.

  • Cont 2...

    Also to be effective the shape charges would need to be directly on the steel. How did they get to all those beams without any jackhammers or demolition equipment? Trust me, we also would have found evidence of blasting caps and the shape charges. Hell the first time the towers were bombed the FBI found the VIN plate and were able to track the truck back to the rental company

  • Cont...

    Each charge would need an electric blasting cap. Without a very large power source you would not be able fire these caps off to start the firing train. We are talking extremely high voltage and amperage. I personally would not use electric, I would use something else for simultaneous detonation, but that would add to the explosive net weight thus making the explosion louder and bigger and heard even farther away.

  • The size of the shape charges they would have needed to make a straight cut through steel as thick as the main support beams for that building would have created a detonation that would have been heard across the river. Not only would you have needed very large linear shape charges you would need simultaneous detonation of each charge.

  • I hate hearing Mr Cosgrove's desperation, but you make a GREAT point with this video. Congratulations.

    There were no bombs. That's a twoofer delusion.

  • I think ita fake....look at the smoke coming from the Towers....its on a loop, so why would loop video to match audio if its real...the audio would be in perfect sync with ANY video made about the Towers.

  • This video proves nothing. I suggest you watch ZEITGEIST.

  • God save Mr. Cosgrove, Mr. Cherry, and everyone else who died that day. I know he was under unimaginable stress in the minutes leading up to the collapse and in stark terror when he realized he was dying, so I'm sure God overlooked Cosgrove's language. Certainly everyone who died except for the scum who hijacked those planes that day were given automatic passes into heaven. The demons are burning in hell now wondering where their 72 virgins are.

  • zeitgeist. start playing the video at 30:45. and thats everything i have to say.

  • How did he get his cell phone to work?Why aren't there hundreds of calls like this?Could he tug at our heart strings any harder?

  • 3:32 is kinda freaky the way hes growling and stuff.

  • not an explosion thats the sound of the floor crushing the floor above him then slammin into him.your a pathetic little man trying to convence others to buy into your dumbass retarded shit.you are a pathetic man.

  • How can she possible say 'hang on in there.'

  • IDIOTS. the sound u hear is the building falling. they arnt at the top. u are hearing the building as it is falling before it gets to them. the bomb thing is so stupid

  • Damn. I could sense the fear in his voice throughout that call. That's a position I wouldn't wish on my worst enemy...

  • 4.26 i hear explosions like things...

    and listen carefully from:

    4.54 till 4.55/56

  • And then the building collapsed ?

  • Ok he couldnt see any flashes, he sayd its black its arid i bet he couldnt see hes arm in front of him, and he mentioned "Bang" when he was talking about how he was going to leave building.

  • The "bang" was the impact of the aircraft.

  • I thought he said he was in the North Tower ???? The video shows the South Tower going down????

  • Northwest corner of the South Tower, floor 105.

  • yes if you listen you can hear them

  • Some people seem SO DESPERATE to believe that this was not carried out by the CIA. It would be good for people to know, not just the truth, but the psychology behind this denial. It is fear that drives your false patriotsm. And it is fear that will cause the demise of our freedom as we understand it.

    The dice were loaded, the game was rigged. As long as you're affraid they'll keep on "protecting" you from the "invisible" enamy. Only when you see this can you grasp the realities of 9/11 or 7/7.

  • 'Some people seem SO DESPERATE to believe that this was not carried out by the CIA'

    The lack of evidence tends to do that...

  • That rumbling sounded a hell of a lot more like a collapse than like explosives going off. No damned explosive charges were involved. Get that through you thick skulls into your tiny pea brains, twoofer morons.

  • try to record a explosion when your standing next to it.

  • Out of all the 9/11 videos showing WTC 1, 2 & 7 there was not 1 single sound of an explosive heard on the films.

    9/11 CTists can only come up with their imaginations that there were explosives in the buildings. Video however doesn't lie but to the CTists it's always too simple to edit sounds of explosions onto films.

    CTists lie like the dogs that they are. They lie even though there's not a shred of evidence to back up their claims. Which is really sad on their behalf.

  • why wud he mention explosives????

    he was tryn to survive..

    i dnt think it was goin threw his mind if there were explosives or not...

  • why wud he mention explosives???????

    hes tryin to survive i dnt think that was goin threw his mind at all if there were explosives or not

  • if there had been explosives going off he would have noticed them. stop your desperate lies!

    one of the most desperate lies I've ever heard actually...

  • why wud he mention them

    all he was tryn to do was survive

    he wudnt be like the are explosions goin off every where.. he was tryn to survive

    you guys know the truth

    the official story is impossible

    and u know

    so u try ur hardest to tryn debunk it..

  • what the fuck do u mean by its impossible?

    its impossible to rig TWO 110 story building with explosives in a few weeks without anyone noticing and with no hard evidence backing up that ridiculous claim!

    that's one thing that is impossible.

    terrorist taking over planes and crashing them into buildings is unfortunately not impossible...

  • its easier to rig a building then have have so called terrorists hijack any plane

    faa and norad knew those planes were not on on route and were told of the hijackings. but did nothing to stop it.

    its not even possible to get a commercial airliner to the pentagon with out being noticed.

  • tinyurl . com / lnohm

    u lack reason. it is possible to hijack a plane, especially before 911 because now the security level has been raised

    and read that article then u know why they didnt find the plane that was hijacked

  • 'its easier to rig a building then have have so called terrorists hijack any plane'

    You are incompetent, Bobo.

  • anyone would mention an explosion!

    AND he didnt even have to mention one to prove there were no explosions cause none is audible in that telephone conversation

  • 'you guys know the truth

    the official story is impossible

    and u know

    so u try ur hardest to tryn debunk it..'

    Like debunk the time you tried to claim Mark Bingham talked to NORAD?

  • he talked to that black girl from FAA for about 30 minutes.

    he told them were on UA 93

    they even prayed together

    so y didnt she notify any 1 about planes

  • But you claimed he talked to NORAD...

  • when did i say that

    u know 4 a fact that norad and the FAA knew where those planes were..

    the only plausible theory to back it up is that they allowed them to strike there targets on purpose and u know it

  • In a December 29, 2007 message to me:

    'norad says that they didnt even know that flight 93 was even hijacked untill 5 minutes after it crashed

    even tho norad was on the phone with mark 4 over 3o minutes while he said lets roll and make a small crater that doesnt even look like a plane hit '

    Hilarity ensued when, after being corrected that Mark didn't talk to NORAD, and 'Let's Roll' originated from Todd Beamer, you remained concrete in your belief that Mark spoke with NORAD.

  • ok u actually save ur msg's damn!

    but explain how they knew where these planes were and failed to act

  • Read this:

    forums dot randi dot org/showpost dot php?p=3074230&postcount=20

  • And this:

    forums dot randi dot org/showthread dot php?t=70300

  • The truth come sooner or later...

  • Why do truthers automatically think explosives when something goes boom? geeze, and they tell us to have common sense. idiots.

  • great post!

  • Kevin said 'bang' ergo explosives were planted inside the Towers.

  • lol at first i really believed another cter nut is spamming again before I read that u wrote it^^

  • Haha, I love using their logic for sharpe-witted satire.

  • why wud he mention explosives???????

    hes tryin to survive i dnt think that was goin threw his mind at all if there were explosives or not

  • You wouldn't mention explosives if they were going off around you?

  • Until 4:46, the video is just a short clip playing over and over. What gives?

  • good work sherlock

  • So what's up with it? Why would anyone throw together anything that stupid?

  • From what I gather it's a clip presented at the Zacarias Moussaoui trial.

    Regardless, the clip shown is not the point of this video so whether it's 'stupid' or not is irrelevant.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more