This must have taken quite a bit of work. Good job! Did you use any Sub-Surface Scattering for the skin? It looks a little flat at the moment. Otherwise, good job.
Let me correct myself in my comment below. I said this is a painting by 17th C. artist Jan Vermeer, well, I should've said this is a portrait AFTER the 17th C. artist Jan Vermeer.
Good job but i was a bit disappointed because thought the head was goig to do an animation like turning her head towards us since i saw the faces of the geometry and such. Btw, for those who don't know this is a painting by the 17th C. Dutch painter Jan Vermeer. He used an interesting technique called "Camera Obscura" a primitive camera in the 17th c. which reflected the image in reverse in the camera box and the artist just traced the projected image. His paintings are very sophisticated.
This is very nice. I would say she looks much older than the original painting, her face is long or with less fat to it. I think you should scale her head a bit wider to compensate. Check the placement of the eyes as well.
Perhaps you should add another softer light to the right of the picture to bring it closer to the original
I love to see these 3D attempts at recreating masterpieces.
I don't understand the point of the twins though. It's the same pic flipped.
That's not a very good reproduction of the "Girl With A Pearl Earring"
iDraw3G 4 months ago
This must have taken quite a bit of work. Good job! Did you use any Sub-Surface Scattering for the skin? It looks a little flat at the moment. Otherwise, good job.
cheesecake44 5 months ago
do you sell your 3D model?
gijo3d 9 months ago
that is really good!!!
unfaithful121 2 years ago
Let me correct myself in my comment below. I said this is a painting by 17th C. artist Jan Vermeer, well, I should've said this is a portrait AFTER the 17th C. artist Jan Vermeer.
edwin11373 2 years ago
Good job but i was a bit disappointed because thought the head was goig to do an animation like turning her head towards us since i saw the faces of the geometry and such. Btw, for those who don't know this is a painting by the 17th C. Dutch painter Jan Vermeer. He used an interesting technique called "Camera Obscura" a primitive camera in the 17th c. which reflected the image in reverse in the camera box and the artist just traced the projected image. His paintings are very sophisticated.
edwin11373 2 years ago
free is good, but could use some sss
tcw295 2 years ago
hair? D=
WC9456 2 years ago
nice model!!
herkulesdraku 2 years ago
where is that girl from i regonise her from a movie
thedoctor2199 3 years ago
This is very nice. I would say she looks much older than the original painting, her face is long or with less fat to it. I think you should scale her head a bit wider to compensate. Check the placement of the eyes as well.
Perhaps you should add another softer light to the right of the picture to bring it closer to the original
I love to see these 3D attempts at recreating masterpieces.
I don't understand the point of the twins though. It's the same pic flipped.
MrDefaulto 3 years ago
The left face is wider
cbrun67176 3 years ago
u just killed the beuty of the picture........
ilovemyfriends2020 3 years ago 7
@ilovemyfriends2020 you just made it less okay to be a snob.
MisterSensational 5 months ago
I have some questions about POV-ray.
-what does this program do on wings 3D archives?
-How can I use wings 3d archives on POV-Ray?
(I guess I have to change the extension of the wings 3d archive and if that's the case, how can I do it?)
FrostySharkSpain 3 years ago
Would of been nice to see from a turn-view.
phillipah7 4 years ago
uncanny
Airgraph1 4 years ago
Great!
zadkiel320 4 years ago
Cool. The only part you could work on is the eyes. It makes the whole picture, you know? Very good job. :)
allcreaturesgreat 4 years ago
Wow. That's pretty fascinating to watch. Interesting.
yumichan89 4 years ago
I am a little bit scared by these creature: Is she a girl?
kaltabosh 4 years ago
VERY NICE !!
pbworks 4 years ago
yup yup I did it! thanks John!
renbu 5 years ago