Simon Singh's idea of labeling all health products for what they do is a good idea. Perhaps McNeil Pharmaceuticals would have then been forced to put on their Zomax label that it could kill you.
The thing about Andy and his crowd is that what they consider quackery never translates into attacking anything in conventional medicine. I even tried to point out some of this quackery on his blog but it was too much for him and he had to block me, after of course numerous meaningless threats to do so.
Real is scientific homeopathy. It cures even when Conventional Allopathic Medicine (CAM) fails. Evidence-based modern homeopathy is a nano-medicine bringing big results for everyone
It was a scary situation for my mum to discover that I was severely allergic
to antibiotics, such as: penicillin etc. Fortunately, my Cambridge graduated GP prescribed me with a homeopathic alternative-Belladonna, during a nasty bout of mastitis; also, I've saved an abscessed tooth, thanks to homeopathy!
PS- The libel against Simon Singh won't hold. Homeopathy would have to PROVE that it works in a court of law- theres no way in hell they'll risk that. The threat of Libel is just thest thumping, posturing to look like you have a point. Like when Homeopathy challenged James Randii to overdose in a lab and he agreed to the challenge, they'll back down as soon as they have to prove it.
We see here another example in the comments of the defense of the indefensable due to blind faith. It's water people, just water. It's a placebo and noone doubts the placebo effect. However, it should be marketted as such and not as some wonderful cure. Water has memory, my bottom. As Dara O'Brien says so well "Get in the sack"
I totally agree! Placebo IS well documented to work and used to be used all the time. Doctors would prescribe magnesium supplements for loads of minor ailments. The thing is homeopathy makes placebo work quite well, it's a well labeled placebo. Placebo doesn't work if you don't beleive it. Someone I know took homeopathic anti-malarials! She thinks that because she didn'tget malaria they worked and will get the same again next time!
@kickofighto A meta-analysis from Australia looked at the effect of chemo-therapy on 20 cancers and found them to be essentially ineffective. Would you also consider the minimal success experienced in those fortunate few as a placebo effect?
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
homoepathy works ... the thing which u don knw about homoeopathy is that it works on a priciple of "similia similibus curantur" i.e likes are cured by likes .... every medicine be it homoeopathic or allopathic has primary and secondary sympotoms .... homoeopathy brings cure in the secondary action whereas other medicines might bring teporary releif immidiately after consumption and secondarily the actual symptoms reapear ....
@sumitdhawan Thanks for the comment. Could you point me towards any good quality research papers which supports this? I'm certain some people do find homeopathic remedies helpful but individual effects are less reliable scientifically. Just as groups of people are involved in clinical trials for traditional medicine, so testing of homeopathic remedies should be subject to the same rigour.
@TheSkepticMag It's very difficult to create studies for homeopathy using conventional methods. That is because each case is treated uniquely. It is not the same as giving one drug to a thousand people for the same condition. That method would run against homeopathic protocol.
By the way the 'tests' on conventional medicine are funded by the very companies that make and profit from the products. How accurate are the results is anybody's guess.
If they were so confident, Sense about Science's campaign to discredit Homeopathy should have begun with Simon Singh & Ben Goldacre saying that they are suing the Society of Homeopaths for deceiving people with Homeopathy remedies.
Instead we see the opposite happening - the Homeopaths suing Simon Singh for libel.
Again it proves that they(Simon Singh & gang) knew their lies would not hold up in a court of law!
Very nice. I can see lots of chemists putting up signs that read: "There is no good evidence to say that this product works for anything whatsoever." :-)
Simon Singh's idea of labeling all health products for what they do is a good idea. Perhaps McNeil Pharmaceuticals would have then been forced to put on their Zomax label that it could kill you.
Good idea.
indoctus41 4 months ago
The thing about Andy and his crowd is that what they consider quackery never translates into attacking anything in conventional medicine. I even tried to point out some of this quackery on his blog but it was too much for him and he had to block me, after of course numerous meaningless threats to do so.
indoctus41 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Remember Sarah Palin. Well clever, critical-thinking Andy Lewis took Sarah's Facebook idea of deleting all critical posts from her blog.
So if you go to Andy's site you'll find everyone miraculously agrees with him.
Clever right?
indoctus41 4 months ago
Comment removed
indoctus41 4 months ago
Real is scientific homeopathy. It cures even when Conventional Allopathic Medicine (CAM) fails. Evidence-based modern homeopathy is a nano-medicine bringing big results for everyone
DrNancyMalik 1 year ago
@DrNancyMalik BuLLSHIT~!!
CyberSetan 1 year ago 2
It was a scary situation for my mum to discover that I was severely allergic
to antibiotics, such as: penicillin etc. Fortunately, my Cambridge graduated GP prescribed me with a homeopathic alternative-Belladonna, during a nasty bout of mastitis; also, I've saved an abscessed tooth, thanks to homeopathy!
Amygdala100 1 year ago
PS- The libel against Simon Singh won't hold. Homeopathy would have to PROVE that it works in a court of law- theres no way in hell they'll risk that. The threat of Libel is just thest thumping, posturing to look like you have a point. Like when Homeopathy challenged James Randii to overdose in a lab and he agreed to the challenge, they'll back down as soon as they have to prove it.
mrgodbehere 1 year ago
We see here another example in the comments of the defense of the indefensable due to blind faith. It's water people, just water. It's a placebo and noone doubts the placebo effect. However, it should be marketted as such and not as some wonderful cure. Water has memory, my bottom. As Dara O'Brien says so well "Get in the sack"
mrgodbehere 1 year ago
@mrgodbehere
I totally agree! Placebo IS well documented to work and used to be used all the time. Doctors would prescribe magnesium supplements for loads of minor ailments. The thing is homeopathy makes placebo work quite well, it's a well labeled placebo. Placebo doesn't work if you don't beleive it. Someone I know took homeopathic anti-malarials! She thinks that because she didn'tget malaria they worked and will get the same again next time!
kickofighto 1 year ago
@kickofighto A meta-analysis from Australia looked at the effect of chemo-therapy on 20 cancers and found them to be essentially ineffective. Would you also consider the minimal success experienced in those fortunate few as a placebo effect?
indoctus41 4 months ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
homoepathy works ... the thing which u don knw about homoeopathy is that it works on a priciple of "similia similibus curantur" i.e likes are cured by likes .... every medicine be it homoeopathic or allopathic has primary and secondary sympotoms .... homoeopathy brings cure in the secondary action whereas other medicines might bring teporary releif immidiately after consumption and secondarily the actual symptoms reapear ....
TRY IT AND THEN TALK ....
sumitdhawan 1 year ago
@sumitdhawan Thanks for the comment. Could you point me towards any good quality research papers which supports this? I'm certain some people do find homeopathic remedies helpful but individual effects are less reliable scientifically. Just as groups of people are involved in clinical trials for traditional medicine, so testing of homeopathic remedies should be subject to the same rigour.
TheSkepticMag 1 year ago 13
@TheSkepticMag It's very difficult to create studies for homeopathy using conventional methods. That is because each case is treated uniquely. It is not the same as giving one drug to a thousand people for the same condition. That method would run against homeopathic protocol.
By the way the 'tests' on conventional medicine are funded by the very companies that make and profit from the products. How accurate are the results is anybody's guess.
indoctus41 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If they were so confident, Sense about Science's campaign to discredit Homeopathy should have begun with Simon Singh & Ben Goldacre saying that they are suing the Society of Homeopaths for deceiving people with Homeopathy remedies.
Instead we see the opposite happening - the Homeopaths suing Simon Singh for libel.
Again it proves that they(Simon Singh & gang) knew their lies would not hold up in a court of law!
mohanaturo 1 year ago
No I wouldn't mind - Stephen LAW
blibnblob 2 years ago
Very nice. I can see lots of chemists putting up signs that read: "There is no good evidence to say that this product works for anything whatsoever." :-)
kaffles 2 years ago
Homeopathy overdoses are so funny ^^
Smorfty 2 years ago
love it :D
stevao 2 years ago
Would you mind if I mirrored this video on my channel (with the appropriate atribution of course)?
hadr0n 2 years ago