@truthfrequency My apologies getting back so late. I hear you! Very impressed that you even know who Menard is... Wonderful theory, and I must concede you are correct in that day to day encounters it is difficult to apply, here especially as UCC filings could wind you up in prison. It's sad that we have to use defacto courts to attempt to free ourselves from our parents unknowing transgressions of the "number"
Peace to you and yours, sending positive energy :)
Guys, keep up the good work. For future reference. Be mindful of anything in the immediate background making distracting noises that aren't part of your report. This draws attention away from your content.
(The item hanging on the rearview swinging back and forth)
I personally do not know but, I would think that they should have to take a rather difficult test to become a police officer. This test should include all possible laws that they would need to know in their line of work. This test should have to be taken at least yearly.
@killermunk1 LOL, you got to be joking me. Police offers are basically the stupidest most worthless kids out of school. They can't do real work so they end up being thugs and miscreants.
Striking me down will validate everything I've been doing and saying thus making me stronger than they could ever imagine ;). They know it will only draw more attention so I don't think I'm on their radar. Plus, there are thousands of people in line behind me who will bow down and do whatever they say. Just read some of the comments here. They have no need to mess with me when they can go after the easy prey.
@truthfrequency These are just hired goons, thugs if you will. Their job is to intimidate and bully. That's what they did as children, and now they get paid to do it as adults. AmeriKKKA is a worthless fascist police state. It should be destroyed, along with every other White piece of shit nation on the planet.
@WoWDart: You're right. Him standing on public property doesn't give him the right to do what he did.
The U.S. CONSTITUTION as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court gave him the right to refuse to identify himself to federal officials, without at least reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement.
@ImpeachAllCriminals did you realize you were wrong so you deleted your comment? i'm confused...
Just so you know, your license plate number is PUBLIC INFORMATION which means anyone can look at it, write it down, record it, take a picture of it for any purse they feel like. That's why it's placed where it is on the car, so anyone can see it and copy it for any reason. There's nothing thuggish or Nazi about recording license plates passing through federal control points...
Here's the issue. You're some asshole recording a federal control point. If you wanted to ask questions, call and ask for an interview. The fact that your harassing the control point brings up certain suspicions especially during all the terrorism that we've been dealing with.
At what point did you think that an entry control point guard would have any answers for you? If you really want to know, you're going to have to go higher up...
@MrSlatwob. OMG REALLY!! He wasn't "taunting" them. He was asking them why they were writing down plate #'s and if it was part of the earthquake! The Cops are ABUSING the law NOT him!!!
What does FEMA stand for anyways? I have always kinda known that they help through big crisis stuff like major natural disasters and/or diease outbreakes (or at least that is what they're supposed to do) But never understood what the acronyms stand for. Also, if they're just here to do what i just describes obove, then why arrest someone for asking questions about it?
I like the way you handled yourself. There are videos where people know their rights and it seems the cops are taking illegal steps, and the civilian just freaks out, at the top of their lungs, screaming their rights and getting in the officer's face. By the end of those videos, I'm somewhat hoping for them to get tasered. I like the fact that you were calm, in control and not aggressive, but still firm on your rights.
Let me say it this way. In the US the biggest government job growth sector is the military, police courts, jails, homeland security,CIA FBI NSA and their bloated pensions etc. In most state and local Governments the "Public Safety" sector is app. 70--85% of their government budget. You expect them to honor some "Constitution" ? Seriously? Its Job Security for them to make an incident out of this. Its job security and Job growth for police and courts to make a Federal issue out of everything.
Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem that people worldwide have obeyed their corrupt government and have gone to war, with millions killed because of this obedience. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and wars, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, all while the grand- thieves-ruling elite are running the country. "OBEDIENCE", that's our problem."
@WoWDart ... This guy proves that these police officers have no problem tossing a person's 4th Amendment out the window... and you think that's a "dick move?"
@Huntington12345678 It's a dick move to go looking for trouble. They didn’t oppress the guy's 4th. They have no obligation to tell a person when they are being investigated. Walking away while being investigated is impeding an investigation, which can get you detained and/or arrested. While detained they'll get a search warrant, thus not violating the 4th. Go into criminal justice and then feel free to make comments about how the law works. Tip: Being questioned by a cop = being investigated.
@Huntington12345678 There doesn't need to be a clear objective. The man's suspicious behavior is enough to begin an investigation. I don't have time, nore the will, to hold your hand through every detail of the law. Please go and learn about it in a book, online, or in a classroom. Don't just spout off about something when you obviously don't know much about it! Also, calling people you don't know and have never spoken to before "sheep" is not acceptable behavior. Please do some growing up.
@WoWDart: You are mistaken. Suspicious behavior is NOT enough to begin an investigation. Officers need behavior suspicious of CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT before detaining a person for investigation. It is not enough for mere suspicion of unusual behavior.
Here, photographing government property or government agents is not at all criminal, even though it may be unusual.
Calling people 'sheep' based on their observed behavior (writing) seems reasoanble to me.
@DavidForthoffer I've read up on some of your views, and therefore know I will be wasting my time conversing with you. The Officer was investigating whether the individual was involved in any criminal behavior. The man walked off, impeding the investigation, and was detained. That is all there is to it. A single observation of a person is not enough to justify a response such as "sheep," especially when the observer is less knowledgeable than the "sheep" on the subject matter at hand. Good day.
@WoWDart: If you have read up on some of my views, then you know that I am pro-law, and often cite the sources for my positions. That, obviously, is not YOUR approach.
If an officer does not have at least reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement, the officer may NOT detain a person just because the officer is "investigating". Such detentions violate the 4th Amendment. Read the U.S.Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio.
@DavidForthoffer@DavidForthoffer Trying to discredit my statements by saying you're right and I'm wrong just because you cite things you do not understand and/or apply to circumstances where they are not meant to apply, is a pathetic attack on my character. Also, capitalizing 'your' doesn't make you look any better. It makes you seem childish imo.
@WoWDart I am not trying to discredit your statements by saying I'm right and you're wrong.
I am trying to discredit your statements by pointing out that the U.S. Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio says that an officer needs at least reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement before detaining someone.
If you think that is an inappropriate cite, explain why, instead of just DECLARING it as not meant to apply.
P.S. I would use italics instead of CAPS if I could.
@DavidForthoffer A case does not make or limit the powers of any office or official. Laws do that. You need to cite laws not cases. Cases interoperate the laws that are in affect at the time of the arrest. The same interpretation by not be true with the laws we have today. Each state also has its own laws which could come into play here.
You don't need to use post script. Italics would still make you seem childish.
I think I have made my point and case. I will not continue on with you.
I have to disagree. Supreme court ruling set the precedent for laws and if a law is written/passed that opposes a Supreme court ruling and if especially if it opposes the constitution, the law is null and void. The law will typically be repealed if the right people make a fuss out of it and bring it to the right courts. Example: Brown vs. Texas overrules the Texas statute that allows police to stop and ID you without reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
@truthfrequency If a law is passed that is unconstitutional then yea it will get repealed or amended, but if a law is passed that opposes a pervious supreme court ruling, then nothing. Each ruling of the Supreme Court is separate from the rest.
@WoWDart: Laws that are passed that are unconstitutional are not necessarily repealed or amended. They are generally interpreted in the light of the constitution, though sometimees that takes years to happen.
The U.S. Supreme Court says that its rulings ARE related to its previous rulings.
@truthfrequency for example: If a law gets passed in Texas that allows for search without a warrant, then a case must make it to the Supreme Court for them to deem it unconstitutional. If a similar law is passed in Ohio a year later, it too must have a case make it to the Supreme Court for a separate ruling.
@WoWDart: Note that lower federal or even state courts sometimes rule that certain state laws violate the U.S. Constitution. Read the Wikipedia article on the USA PATRIOT Act for examples.
@truthfrequency however, when you go barging in a secure location demanding information with a camera, you're just looking to cause a scene. I would have done exactly what that guard did. That is suspicious behavior sir. There are more civil ways of conducting an interview to ascertain information. Try calling ahead and setting something up next time.
This is the pecking order, according to the constitution. The state laws are on top however the Federal laws which PROTECT individual/constitutional rights supersede state laws. Supreme court rulings supersede everything so long as they are in compliance with the constitution. The Fed government has 3 roles: coin money, protect our borders and ensure state laws do not violate the constitution. That's it. But they're not doing any of the three,
@truthfrequency Supreme court rulings supersede rulings of other courts. They do coin money, there is an attempt at securing our boarders (both foreign and domestic), and the supreme court overrules state's rulings all the time. The fed has more than 3 responsibilities. Why did they drop the charges against you? Was it because they came to find that you posed no threat, and didn't want to bother with a silly case like this?
I hate to break it to you but the Federal Reserve is a private bank and about as Federal as Federal Express. The 10th amendment states that powers not specifically delegated by the constitution are reserved for the state so I don't know where you are getting more than 3 responsibilities. The government is building empires and invading foreign countries, they are NOT protecting our borders because they've never been threatened. Case dismissed because there was no crime.
@truthfrequency I'm not even going to point out the reasons why your statement is so ridiculously ignorant and sad, because to any sane person they are blatantly obvious. You are a nutter.
@WoWDart said, "A case does not make or limit the powers of any office or official. Laws do that."
Unfortunately for you, the police, the courts, and government disagree with you. They operate according to the constitutions and laws, as interpreted by the applicable courts. Good luck in court with your arguments...
@DavidForthoffer I am very confident the officer had reasonable suspicion (which he could articulate) of possible criminal happenings. Again they do not need to articulate that to you. They only have to articulate when and why you are under arrest and your rights there forth. Terry vs. Ohio is old news my friend. There are plenty of new loop holes officers can legally use to avoid cases like Terry vs. Ohio.
@WoWDart: If you want credibility, cite at least ONE new loop hole an officer can legally use to avoid cases like Terry v. Ohio. Otherwise, you're just saying "I'm right and you're wrong."
Even though Terry v. Ohio is "old news", it still defines THE standard for detention, and is cited as such by thousands of more recent appellate opinions. It is old news but still good news.
@DavidForthoffer Due to FEMA's involvement in this case I believe this would suffice: 41 CFR 102-74.385. I can see them applying either of these as well: 36 CFR 327.24 - Interference with Government employees or 36 CFR. 261.9, Property article (e), but I wouldn’t put much faith in them sticking. Loopholes are funny that way.
@WoWDart: Since the U.S. Constitution as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in e.g. Terry v. Ohio overrules the Code of Federal regulations, a "loop hole" in Terry would be a more recent case by the U.S. Supreme Court changing some part of the standard.
There IS NO such loop hole, unless you want to consider ongoing "clarifications" on what is "reasonable". But that's just nudging the line here or there, not sneaking through it.
@DavidForthoffer Terry vs. Ohio does not define the standard for detention. The constitution, its amendments, and laws do. Old news is good news, but since the past is not the present you should probably read up on the laws that are in affect today.
Cops just do what they're told. Most of them are decent hard working people that have no idea what's really going on. Don't be foolish and take the stance that 'all cops are with the NWO' lol. You'll never get anywhere meddling with the police, you'll just end up in jail for messing with them (that's how they see it). Real change will only come if we all unite peacefully and protest, impeach, arrest, etc.
I was going to watch this video because I thought it would be an interesting example of police ignorance - then I say the introduction up to you arriving on location and completely lost interest. It was certain key aspects that turned me off like the liberal use of the words "FEMA" and "new world order" and the fact that you had someone ranting in German in the background of the intro who was very likely Adolph Hitler - among other things.
It's OK. You have the freedom to watch and not watch whatever you want. That's why people like myself are willing to go to stand up and even be arrested in order to protect those rights. You also have a right to consent and be a slave and totally miss the point of everything presented in this video. I will keep fighting so you maintain that right.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I do not see the big deal here, cops cannot be expected to memorise every single law to the word. You refused to show ID and continued to film the officers, you were being an annoyance and deserved what you got.
So let me get this straight. Their job is to enforce the law right? But you state they cannot be expected to know what they are enforcing? So using your logic, cops are not expected to know how to do their jobs? So they are incompetent of doing their jobs right? What other job could a person get where competency of the job is not a standard? So what makes the job of law enforcement any different? Your logic is totally 100% flawed.
@truthfrequency cops are there to keep the peace, you are basically abusing the fine print of the law, If a cop asks you for your ID, why not just be respectful? you could have atleast turned off the camera.
@truthfrequency "they" hire the most uneducated to assure "they" have the most pliable thugs.. it escapes me why the dolts [STILL asleep - population] still cheer for their own demise..
@MrSlatwob: Officers do not NEED to memorize every single law to the word. They only need to know when they are authorized and expected to ACT. If they do not know whether they are authorized to do something, they should find out BEFORE acting.
All officers OUGHT to know that it is not a crime to annoy police officers, or to disobey orders unrelated to the performance of their DUTY. This officer did not have the authority or duty to punish George for failing to produce his ID.
@skinnydog131 no, but that does not mean that you should do It just because you can. He was basically taunting the cops by continuing to film them, this is basically abusing the law.
"This is what life is going to be like for us now..." Life's not like that for me. Life's not like that for my family. Life's not like that for my friends and neighbours. Probably because we don't go out of our way to antagonize hothead cops by trying to uncover some conspiracy. They wrote down your license? So what? Every time you take a toll, pass a traffic camera, renew your license people write down information. Who cares? They have info on THOUSANDS. You're not special to them. Til now.
Well Chris just let me say from all us sheepal out here THANK YOU for doing something I wish I could do. I have long watched these type of Vids and felt i knew how i would handle a encounter. But after watching ur vids i realize how little knowledge i have. And as your vids show, Even if you know your rites this doesnt prevent a azzhole from hooking you up anyway. I also agree with others on that if you dont hit with a law suit then they have learned nothing. lets see you go back to same local
@truthfrequency try doing more research, all media falls under commercial speech, check Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association, 436 U.S. 447 (1978). Also, no mater what state you are in, when you are issued a state I.D., and you sign your name to the dotted line, you agree to surrender or produce it to any local, state, or federal entity, the fourth amendment does not protect you from that due to the tenth amendement.
Also, you can be detatined LEGALY by any law enforcement agency if you refuse to produce proof of identification when requested until I.D. can be proven. Also, once you are detained, by supreme court ruleing, the person being detained and the immedeate area is allowed to be searched, that is something else the $th amendment does not protect you from.
When you want to make these claims and use court ruleings to try and make you like like a know it all, make sure you investugate the ones that will hurt you as well as the ones that will help you.
And before you try to open your mouth to big about me having the right or the knowledge to talk about this stuff, I spent 15 years putting my life on the line to protect those rights that you so flagerantly try to hide behind, and because of that, I have studied my constitution (oh, next time, try looking also at National security laws as well as DHS books)
Well, I appreciate the time you've spent protecting our rights so I hope you appreciate the time I do as well. However it's very cut and dry. Anything that opposes the constitution is null and voice. The supreme courts have ruled as such. However, this case was dismissed with simple motion so the Federal judge agreed with my position 100%.
@MrBigun1971: It is ILLEGAL for any law enforcement agency to detain you simply for refusing to produce proof of identification when requested, even when you are carrying ID. Read the U.S. Supreme Court case Hiibel v. Nevada.
@MrBigun1971: The Fourth Amendment DOES prohibit a person being detained (but not arrested) from being searched, and from the immediate area from being searched. Read the U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio.
You would have been right had you said "frisked for weapons if the totality of circumstances justify it" and "protective sweep...".
@MrBigun1971: Even though you may have to consent to showing ID when asked in order to get the ID, police are not even allowed to detain you long enough to ask, unless they have a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement. That IS your Fourth Amendment right.
@MrBigun1971: You also misunderstand Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association (S.Ct.1978). The U.S. Supreme Court did NOT hold that all media falls under commercial speech. They ruled much more narrowly—commercial speech is not protected by the First Amendment. They actually held: 'We have not discarded the "common-sense" distinction between speech proposing a commercial transaction, which occurs in an area traditionally subject to government regulation, and other varieties of speech'.
@truthfrequency an investigation can always turn into a terry stop. You shouldn't have given him any ammo. all he has to do is say he percieves you as a threat. Terrystop is now in play
As I watch this vid, there is a barack 2012 ad at the top of the page.......thought all of us yters opinion didnt matter? "The 'online' community and their pesky, unrelenting legalization questions. They will be the downfall of us all! Just ignore em and maybe they'll go away.....that or we fraud the hell outta the voting results......."
Do not believe the BULLSHIT about Comet Elenin or Nibiru or the Mayan calender CRAP.
These so-called "scientists" are LIARS and are covering up the TRUE nature of our Universe.
The Earth is a Flat Disc and the heavens or Sky Dome stretch a mere 4000 miles up and rotate around the earth. THIS IS BIBLICAL. Think I'm a nutjob? LOL Keep on believing the Greek Math/Pagan Science that was proven FALSE 100s of years ago.
Check out my channel for more information about Flat Earth Theory.
I'm not going to turn this into a debate on whether the earth is flat or not but I watched some of your videos with an open mind and I found no evidence to prove it and completely baseless claims. Furthermore, they fail to point to any other body in space that is flat. Everything is a sphere so why is the earth the exception? There is more evidence to support a hollow earth than a flat earth.
@truthfrequency Thank you for your open-mindedness despite how ludicrous it might seem. I challenge you to find ONE peer-reviewed scientific study that proves the earth is a sphere. You will find countless experiments conducted over the past 100 years that prove the earth is flat.
Check out the homepage link on my channel for more information on these experiments.
Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool. If you really believe in this then why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool. If you really believe in this then why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this.
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
@FlatHorizon holy shit you are truly a NEANDERTHAL! i cant believe people are as stupid as you are... how about you watch the video of footage from a U2 spy plane from 80,000 feet above see level... you can see the fucking contour of the earth, you can ORBIT the earth, because it is round you dummy! you are retarded...
Do not Fear my Brothers and Sisters WE WILL PREVAIL. For it is written:
Revelations 3:9
"I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars--I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you."
Here's my thing, when you come looking for trouble, though you guys were in a legal right, you were asking for it. These guys are just doing their jobs that's it. And half you guys commenting are just rebelling for a reason that makes no sense to me. My grandchildren will not be slaves. I wake up everyday and work while still going to school, and people like you guys who just rebel just to get attention piss me off because you provoke these reactions by pissing people off.. If you show id they
I take it they aren't teaching you the constitution in school or anything about the Patriot Act or the NDAA.Besides, I don't recognize the idea that some piece of paper with ink gives them a right impede on my unalienable rights (as endowed by my creator). If I don't have a right to do it to them, they don't have a right to do it to me. Simple, end of story. There is nothing to rebel against because their authority is an illusion. They are criminals with guns.
@truthfrequency Honestly Chris idc about criminals w/ guns, but things won't change because you cause a scene somewhere.. If you wanna change this...run for a office dude. Cause what you're doing here got you locked up, your girl crying and they let you go yeah but what did you expect to gain from this? The truth? Dude the changers are in charge! They're not theorists running around getting arrested.
@thekidchris19 The way to expose a tyrant is to make them act like one. Your argument is basically that you don't really need these silly rights, so you are just looking for trouble by pointing these instances out. This is a nation of laws. The law says that this young man broke no law, and was never even under suspicion of doing so. When these things get let go, they are like cancer. They spread, and they get bigger. Your mentality is leading your children right into despotism.
@thekidchris19 "Posterity, you will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it." John Adams
@thekidchris19 If you don't excersise your freedoms, they get taken away. Right now they are already being taken away because police do not understand the law and act outside of their legal powers. There are examples all over the internet. I myself had a gun pulled on me at a simple traffic stop as soon as the officer exited the car. I did absolutely nothing to deserve having a gun pulled on me, and after I became upset at the event the cop didn't know why I was upset... Think or don't. IDC.
@chisleu@wreksangel I look at the 50's and 60's and 70's and I say, hmmm they stood against what they couldn't change. Those protesters were beaten, or arrested even shot. So I'm not 'blind' I...I'm choosing to say FUCK THAT DRAMA. If you wanna change shit, get into a position where you can make changes. That's all I'm saying.
@thekidchris19 The point is that unlawful rules have no authority if people " just doing their jobs" don't enforce them. The Nazis were just doing their jobs - I guess they deserved respect and nonprovocation? Why is it "asking for it" to ask questions of the gov who is spending our tax dollars watching everything we do without our permission and not making us any safer? THEY are paid by us - they should asnwer OUR questions. dont you see that?
@thekidchris19 I disagree. There are people who go and harass these officers, get in their faces, scream at them, and that can impede their job. This guy is just asking polite questions and answering no to questions. They are questions because the officers know damn well that they can't FORCE you to do any of the things they asked, otherwise they wouldn't even ask the question. They are just sooo used to people handing their rights away and saying "Yes Sir!"
@truthfrequency All I want to say is GOOD JOB! Police need to be held accountable for their actions. I can not believe there are states out there which made it illegal to video and audio record police officers, that is UNACCEPTABLE. I wish someone would take these states to court and get these laws stricken, they are unconstitutional.
IN FREE COUNTRY ANY THINK WHAT YOU DO IS NOT LEGAL - ANY THINK WHAT THEY DO IS LEGAL and LEGAL FOR YOU IS ONLY PAY THEM MONEY ALL THE TIME and THEY ALWAYS RIGHT. THEY HAVE POWER TO DO WHAT EVER THEY WANT WITH YOU and YOUR FREE COUNTRY IS ONLY IN YOURS DREAMS ! ! !
There is no such thing as the new world order, the frase was made up by Bush. The only thing that even comes close is American imperialism. If the video was shot in California and i was the fema agent i would haul your ass in claiming 5150.
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really.
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really.
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really
@truthfrequency My apologies getting back so late. I hear you! Very impressed that you even know who Menard is... Wonderful theory, and I must concede you are correct in that day to day encounters it is difficult to apply, here especially as UCC filings could wind you up in prison. It's sad that we have to use defacto courts to attempt to free ourselves from our parents unknowing transgressions of the "number"
Peace to you and yours, sending positive energy :)
Chris
highman5 6 hours ago
Bravo!
SweetSanity79 7 hours ago
Guys, keep up the good work. For future reference. Be mindful of anything in the immediate background making distracting noises that aren't part of your report. This draws attention away from your content.
(The item hanging on the rearview swinging back and forth)
No0neH3r3 15 hours ago
Thug bitch ass cops. They would piss themselves if they had to face a real criminal.
degenret01 20 hours ago
FEMA is the new w. order.. watch X-files?
ebayisajoke 1 day ago
what was the slip they gave him a FINE ?
456Edavis 1 day ago
73 nwo lapdogs watched this video.
ErisDiscordianPope23 1 day ago
@ErisDiscordianPope23 < Sheep working for the government.
456Edavis 1 day ago
Those cops are from the New world order!! Get a life...
DriePie09 3 days ago
I personally do not know but, I would think that they should have to take a rather difficult test to become a police officer. This test should include all possible laws that they would need to know in their line of work. This test should have to be taken at least yearly.
killermunk1 3 days ago
@killermunk1 LOL, you got to be joking me. Police offers are basically the stupidest most worthless kids out of school. They can't do real work so they end up being thugs and miscreants.
buzzin1975 2 days ago
There doing the old, spare your life this time so your all feared up, and not credible next time, when they actually take your life.
lightsoljer 3 days ago
@lightsoljer
Striking me down will validate everything I've been doing and saying thus making me stronger than they could ever imagine ;). They know it will only draw more attention so I don't think I'm on their radar. Plus, there are thousands of people in line behind me who will bow down and do whatever they say. Just read some of the comments here. They have no need to mess with me when they can go after the easy prey.
truthfrequency 3 days ago 3
@truthfrequency These are just hired goons, thugs if you will. Their job is to intimidate and bully. That's what they did as children, and now they get paid to do it as adults. AmeriKKKA is a worthless fascist police state. It should be destroyed, along with every other White piece of shit nation on the planet.
buzzin1975 2 days ago
7:55 "Its the United States...." and the video freezes PRICELESS
KZWolf 3 days ago
@WoWDart: You're right. Him standing on public property doesn't give him the right to do what he did.
The U.S. CONSTITUTION as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court gave him the right to refuse to identify himself to federal officials, without at least reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement.
DavidForthoffer 3 days ago
@ImpeachAllCriminals did you realize you were wrong so you deleted your comment? i'm confused...
Just so you know, your license plate number is PUBLIC INFORMATION which means anyone can look at it, write it down, record it, take a picture of it for any purse they feel like. That's why it's placed where it is on the car, so anyone can see it and copy it for any reason. There's nothing thuggish or Nazi about recording license plates passing through federal control points...
Jossificator 4 days ago
@Jossificator I realized I had 2 typo's & corrected, are you the comment police..I see that YOU removed a comment as well, silly squirt..!
ImpeachAllCriminals 3 days ago
@Jossificator You give yourself wayyyyy tooo much credit boy..!
ImpeachAllCriminals 3 days ago
does it have anything to do with newbiro or the common omoden?? what did he say at 5:40?
papitosabe 4 days ago
Here's the issue. You're some asshole recording a federal control point. If you wanted to ask questions, call and ask for an interview. The fact that your harassing the control point brings up certain suspicions especially during all the terrorism that we've been dealing with.
At what point did you think that an entry control point guard would have any answers for you? If you really want to know, you're going to have to go higher up...
Jossificator 5 days ago
@Jossificator Listen genius, the couple taped b/c "they" got his g/f license plate info.. WHAT THE HELL FOR, you THUG?
That was/is a VIOLATION of her rights..!!
Unfortunately, DUMB COWARDS like you make it much more difficult to fight the Nazi's..
ImpeachAllCriminals 4 days ago
Our Federal Taxes: Hard at work to keep you enslaved, harassed, and deprived of your Constitutionally protected, God-given Rights.
xavierspade666 5 days ago
Far simpler, read the Glick decision regarding videotaping cops in the course of their duties..
ewhitlow 5 days ago
@MrSlatwob. OMG REALLY!! He wasn't "taunting" them. He was asking them why they were writing down plate #'s and if it was part of the earthquake! The Cops are ABUSING the law NOT him!!!
princessvaladez 6 days ago
What does FEMA stand for anyways? I have always kinda known that they help through big crisis stuff like major natural disasters and/or diease outbreakes (or at least that is what they're supposed to do) But never understood what the acronyms stand for. Also, if they're just here to do what i just describes obove, then why arrest someone for asking questions about it?
maharley27 1 week ago
@maharley27 Federal Emergency Management Agency...
Jdawg0492 1 week ago
@maharley27
Federal Emergency Management Agency like someone said. FEMA is building concentration camps all of the United States. Watch the film Camp Fema.
truthfrequency 1 week ago
@maharley27 Where have you been living, on Mars..?
ImpeachAllCriminals 4 days ago
@ImpeachAllCriminals -Aperently! LOL! But hey, at least ive woken up to things that are imporatant now. What should i start looking up?
maharley27 4 days ago
yea yea i'm a " cop" i have a gun uuuuuuuu
penarodea 1 week ago
all the cops are the same, stupid nasi people
penarodea 1 week ago
AND FEDERAL LAND IS OWNED BY WE THE PEOPLE!PERIOD!!!!!!!!!!
oxfordmach1 1 week ago
these officers should all be FIRED! WE THE PEOPLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!
oxfordmach1 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
NEW INDIANAPOLIS HOMELAND SECURITY EMERGENCY CENTER OF OPERATIONS /watch?v=gjU5pSfy6h0
clipent 1 week ago
I like the way you handled yourself. There are videos where people know their rights and it seems the cops are taking illegal steps, and the civilian just freaks out, at the top of their lungs, screaming their rights and getting in the officer's face. By the end of those videos, I'm somewhat hoping for them to get tasered. I like the fact that you were calm, in control and not aggressive, but still firm on your rights.
ltntlocust 1 week ago
Let me say it this way. In the US the biggest government job growth sector is the military, police courts, jails, homeland security,CIA FBI NSA and their bloated pensions etc. In most state and local Governments the "Public Safety" sector is app. 70--85% of their government budget. You expect them to honor some "Constitution" ? Seriously? Its Job Security for them to make an incident out of this. Its job security and Job growth for police and courts to make a Federal issue out of everything.
iStoDiaolo 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Our problem is civil obedience. Our problem that people worldwide have obeyed their corrupt government and have gone to war, with millions killed because of this obedience. Our problem is that people are obedient all over the world in the face of poverty and starvation and stupidity, and wars, and cruelty. Our problem is that people are obedient while the jails are full of petty thieves, all while the grand- thieves-ruling elite are running the country. "OBEDIENCE", that's our problem."
JanRichardus 1 week ago
Civil Obedience is the problem, not civil Dis-obedience.
JanRichardus 1 week ago
Way to go out of your way just to cause a scene and test the ignorance of a cop. Dick move imo.
WoWDart 1 week ago
@WoWDart ... This guy proves that these police officers have no problem tossing a person's 4th Amendment out the window... and you think that's a "dick move?"
Baaahhhh for me, sheep. BAAAAAHHHHHH!!!
Huntington12345678 1 week ago
@Huntington12345678 It's a dick move to go looking for trouble. They didn’t oppress the guy's 4th. They have no obligation to tell a person when they are being investigated. Walking away while being investigated is impeding an investigation, which can get you detained and/or arrested. While detained they'll get a search warrant, thus not violating the 4th. Go into criminal justice and then feel free to make comments about how the law works. Tip: Being questioned by a cop = being investigated.
WoWDart 1 week ago
@WoWDart ... And what crime was he being "investigated" for?
Huntington12345678 1 week ago
@Huntington12345678 There doesn't need to be a clear objective. The man's suspicious behavior is enough to begin an investigation. I don't have time, nore the will, to hold your hand through every detail of the law. Please go and learn about it in a book, online, or in a classroom. Don't just spout off about something when you obviously don't know much about it! Also, calling people you don't know and have never spoken to before "sheep" is not acceptable behavior. Please do some growing up.
WoWDart 1 week ago
@WoWDart: You are mistaken. Suspicious behavior is NOT enough to begin an investigation. Officers need behavior suspicious of CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT before detaining a person for investigation. It is not enough for mere suspicion of unusual behavior.
Here, photographing government property or government agents is not at all criminal, even though it may be unusual.
Calling people 'sheep' based on their observed behavior (writing) seems reasoanble to me.
DavidForthoffer 1 week ago
@DavidForthoffer I've read up on some of your views, and therefore know I will be wasting my time conversing with you. The Officer was investigating whether the individual was involved in any criminal behavior. The man walked off, impeding the investigation, and was detained. That is all there is to it. A single observation of a person is not enough to justify a response such as "sheep," especially when the observer is less knowledgeable than the "sheep" on the subject matter at hand. Good day.
WoWDart 1 week ago
@WoWDart: If you have read up on some of my views, then you know that I am pro-law, and often cite the sources for my positions. That, obviously, is not YOUR approach.
If an officer does not have at least reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement, the officer may NOT detain a person just because the officer is "investigating". Such detentions violate the 4th Amendment. Read the U.S.Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio.
DavidForthoffer 1 week ago
@DavidForthoffer @DavidForthoffer Trying to discredit my statements by saying you're right and I'm wrong just because you cite things you do not understand and/or apply to circumstances where they are not meant to apply, is a pathetic attack on my character. Also, capitalizing 'your' doesn't make you look any better. It makes you seem childish imo.
WoWDart 1 week ago
@WoWDart I am not trying to discredit your statements by saying I'm right and you're wrong.
I am trying to discredit your statements by pointing out that the U.S. Supreme Court in Terry v. Ohio says that an officer needs at least reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement before detaining someone.
If you think that is an inappropriate cite, explain why, instead of just DECLARING it as not meant to apply.
P.S. I would use italics instead of CAPS if I could.
DavidForthoffer 6 days ago
@DavidForthoffer A case does not make or limit the powers of any office or official. Laws do that. You need to cite laws not cases. Cases interoperate the laws that are in affect at the time of the arrest. The same interpretation by not be true with the laws we have today. Each state also has its own laws which could come into play here.
You don't need to use post script. Italics would still make you seem childish.
I think I have made my point and case. I will not continue on with you.
WoWDart 6 days ago
@WoWDart
I have to disagree. Supreme court ruling set the precedent for laws and if a law is written/passed that opposes a Supreme court ruling and if especially if it opposes the constitution, the law is null and void. The law will typically be repealed if the right people make a fuss out of it and bring it to the right courts. Example: Brown vs. Texas overrules the Texas statute that allows police to stop and ID you without reasonable suspicion or probable cause.
truthfrequency 5 days ago
@truthfrequency If a law is passed that is unconstitutional then yea it will get repealed or amended, but if a law is passed that opposes a pervious supreme court ruling, then nothing. Each ruling of the Supreme Court is separate from the rest.
WoWDart 5 days ago
@WoWDart: Laws that are passed that are unconstitutional are not necessarily repealed or amended. They are generally interpreted in the light of the constitution, though sometimees that takes years to happen.
The U.S. Supreme Court says that its rulings ARE related to its previous rulings.
DavidForthoffer 5 days ago
@truthfrequency for example: If a law gets passed in Texas that allows for search without a warrant, then a case must make it to the Supreme Court for them to deem it unconstitutional. If a similar law is passed in Ohio a year later, it too must have a case make it to the Supreme Court for a separate ruling.
WoWDart 5 days ago
@WoWDart: Note that lower federal or even state courts sometimes rule that certain state laws violate the U.S. Constitution. Read the Wikipedia article on the USA PATRIOT Act for examples.
DavidForthoffer 5 days ago
@truthfrequency however, when you go barging in a secure location demanding information with a camera, you're just looking to cause a scene. I would have done exactly what that guard did. That is suspicious behavior sir. There are more civil ways of conducting an interview to ascertain information. Try calling ahead and setting something up next time.
WoWDart 5 days ago
@WoWDart
This is the pecking order, according to the constitution. The state laws are on top however the Federal laws which PROTECT individual/constitutional rights supersede state laws. Supreme court rulings supersede everything so long as they are in compliance with the constitution. The Fed government has 3 roles: coin money, protect our borders and ensure state laws do not violate the constitution. That's it. But they're not doing any of the three,
truthfrequency 5 days ago
@truthfrequency Supreme court rulings supersede rulings of other courts. They do coin money, there is an attempt at securing our boarders (both foreign and domestic), and the supreme court overrules state's rulings all the time. The fed has more than 3 responsibilities. Why did they drop the charges against you? Was it because they came to find that you posed no threat, and didn't want to bother with a silly case like this?
WoWDart 5 days ago
@WoWDart
I hate to break it to you but the Federal Reserve is a private bank and about as Federal as Federal Express. The 10th amendment states that powers not specifically delegated by the constitution are reserved for the state so I don't know where you are getting more than 3 responsibilities. The government is building empires and invading foreign countries, they are NOT protecting our borders because they've never been threatened. Case dismissed because there was no crime.
truthfrequency 4 days ago
@truthfrequency I'm not even going to point out the reasons why your statement is so ridiculously ignorant and sad, because to any sane person they are blatantly obvious. You are a nutter.
WoWDart 4 days ago
@WoWDart: You made a typo in your post ending in "You are a nutter". It should have started out with "@WoWDart".
DavidForthoffer 3 days ago
@truthfrequency: The Fedeeral Reserve is a FEDERAL bank. It was created by the federal government. It gets its budget from the federal budget.
Some people think that because the Federal Reserve is an independent agency (true), that means it is a private bank (false).
DavidForthoffer 3 days ago
@DavidForthoffer I hardly ever call anyone an idiot, but YOU deserve it..!
ImpeachAllCriminals 3 days ago
@ImpeachAllCriminals: Since I just echo the rulings if the U.S. Supreme Court, you no doubt think the U.S. Supreme court justices are idiots, too.
DavidForthoffer 2 days ago
@DavidForthoffer Not only that, they're idiot CRIMINALS..!!
ImpeachAllCriminals 2 days ago
@DavidForthoffer just waiting for the uploaders response, but im sorry to say that this information is incorrect.
Fyreguy16 1 day ago
@Fyreguy16: I don't know what you mean by "this information".
DavidForthoffer 18 hours ago
@WoWDart said, "A case does not make or limit the powers of any office or official. Laws do that."
Unfortunately for you, the police, the courts, and government disagree with you. They operate according to the constitutions and laws, as interpreted by the applicable courts. Good luck in court with your arguments...
DavidForthoffer 5 days ago
@DavidForthoffer I am very confident the officer had reasonable suspicion (which he could articulate) of possible criminal happenings. Again they do not need to articulate that to you. They only have to articulate when and why you are under arrest and your rights there forth. Terry vs. Ohio is old news my friend. There are plenty of new loop holes officers can legally use to avoid cases like Terry vs. Ohio.
I said good day.
WoWDart 1 week ago
@WoWDart: If you want credibility, cite at least ONE new loop hole an officer can legally use to avoid cases like Terry v. Ohio. Otherwise, you're just saying "I'm right and you're wrong."
Even though Terry v. Ohio is "old news", it still defines THE standard for detention, and is cited as such by thousands of more recent appellate opinions. It is old news but still good news.
DavidForthoffer 6 days ago
@DavidForthoffer Due to FEMA's involvement in this case I believe this would suffice: 41 CFR 102-74.385. I can see them applying either of these as well: 36 CFR 327.24 - Interference with Government employees or 36 CFR. 261.9, Property article (e), but I wouldn’t put much faith in them sticking. Loopholes are funny that way.
WoWDart 6 days ago
@WoWDart: Since the U.S. Constitution as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court in e.g. Terry v. Ohio overrules the Code of Federal regulations, a "loop hole" in Terry would be a more recent case by the U.S. Supreme Court changing some part of the standard.
There IS NO such loop hole, unless you want to consider ongoing "clarifications" on what is "reasonable". But that's just nudging the line here or there, not sneaking through it.
DavidForthoffer 5 days ago
@DavidForthoffer Terry vs. Ohio does not define the standard for detention. The constitution, its amendments, and laws do. Old news is good news, but since the past is not the present you should probably read up on the laws that are in affect today.
WoWDart 6 days ago
Cops just do what they're told. Most of them are decent hard working people that have no idea what's really going on. Don't be foolish and take the stance that 'all cops are with the NWO' lol. You'll never get anywhere meddling with the police, you'll just end up in jail for messing with them (that's how they see it). Real change will only come if we all unite peacefully and protest, impeach, arrest, etc.
S3234953 1 week ago
@S3234953
Those who make peaceful revolution impossible make violent revolution inevitable.
truthfrequency 1 week ago 14
@truthfrequency I love what you said its great!
JeriDro 1 week ago
@truthfrequency I have a strong sense that it will come to that..
ImpeachAllCriminals 4 days ago
I was going to watch this video because I thought it would be an interesting example of police ignorance - then I say the introduction up to you arriving on location and completely lost interest. It was certain key aspects that turned me off like the liberal use of the words "FEMA" and "new world order" and the fact that you had someone ranting in German in the background of the intro who was very likely Adolph Hitler - among other things.
Snipe4261 1 week ago
@Snipe4261
It's OK. You have the freedom to watch and not watch whatever you want. That's why people like myself are willing to go to stand up and even be arrested in order to protect those rights. You also have a right to consent and be a slave and totally miss the point of everything presented in this video. I will keep fighting so you maintain that right.
truthfrequency 1 week ago 6
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I do not see the big deal here, cops cannot be expected to memorise every single law to the word. You refused to show ID and continued to film the officers, you were being an annoyance and deserved what you got.
MrSlatwob 1 week ago
@MrSlatwob
So let me get this straight. Their job is to enforce the law right? But you state they cannot be expected to know what they are enforcing? So using your logic, cops are not expected to know how to do their jobs? So they are incompetent of doing their jobs right? What other job could a person get where competency of the job is not a standard? So what makes the job of law enforcement any different? Your logic is totally 100% flawed.
truthfrequency 1 week ago 19
@truthfrequency cops are there to keep the peace, you are basically abusing the fine print of the law, If a cop asks you for your ID, why not just be respectful? you could have atleast turned off the camera.
MrSlatwob 1 week ago
@truthfrequency also, I'm not against standing up for your rights, but doing it over something so small, It's just sillly.
MrSlatwob 1 week ago
@truthfrequency "they" hire the most uneducated to assure "they" have the most pliable thugs.. it escapes me why the dolts [STILL asleep - population] still cheer for their own demise..
ImpeachAllCriminals 4 days ago
@MrSlatwob: Officers do not NEED to memorize every single law to the word. They only need to know when they are authorized and expected to ACT. If they do not know whether they are authorized to do something, they should find out BEFORE acting.
All officers OUGHT to know that it is not a crime to annoy police officers, or to disobey orders unrelated to the performance of their DUTY. This officer did not have the authority or duty to punish George for failing to produce his ID.
DavidForthoffer 1 week ago
@MrSlatwob Is it illegal to be annoying?
skinnydog131 6 days ago
@skinnydog131 no, but that does not mean that you should do It just because you can. He was basically taunting the cops by continuing to film them, this is basically abusing the law.
MrSlatwob 6 days ago
@MrSlatwob: Why do you think that videotaping the officer is abusing the law in any way, shape, or form?
It might annoy the officer, but that would only be because the officer was not behaving the way a good, law-abiding officer should behave.
DavidForthoffer 6 days ago
@MrSlatwob The supreme court stated that we CAN tape the police, buffoon..!
ImpeachAllCriminals 4 days ago
@MrSlatwob ..since you obviously don't know how to spell, I presume you're a cop.. lol
ImpeachAllCriminals 4 days ago
@MrSlatwob This is the most basic of laws they broke. They should know this one.
travissand 4 days ago
Tell that fucker off rofl
killgos13 1 week ago
haha i love this guy :Dd
macyisacat 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Casperjasper88... It is people like you that would not stand in the way of Hitler taking over Germany too. Get a backbone!!!
twowitnessesoftheson 1 week ago
"This is what life is going to be like for us now..." Life's not like that for me. Life's not like that for my family. Life's not like that for my friends and neighbours. Probably because we don't go out of our way to antagonize hothead cops by trying to uncover some conspiracy. They wrote down your license? So what? Every time you take a toll, pass a traffic camera, renew your license people write down information. Who cares? They have info on THOUSANDS. You're not special to them. Til now.
CasperJasper88 1 week ago
America. What's left to love?
TribTrekker 1 week ago
@TribTrekker Tom Cruise... gotta admit, he's pretty awesome.
erikthemagicalpanda 1 week ago
Have you filled any lawsuit?
Markedguardian 1 week ago
How is he a lapdog? He just seemed annoyed... B.Larson.
thekidchris19 1 week ago
Get a job dude. gong to a federal facility to talk crazy serves no purpose other than see real mental illness on line
tromboista 1 week ago
Well Chris just let me say from all us sheepal out here THANK YOU for doing something I wish I could do. I have long watched these type of Vids and felt i knew how i would handle a encounter. But after watching ur vids i realize how little knowledge i have. And as your vids show, Even if you know your rites this doesnt prevent a azzhole from hooking you up anyway. I also agree with others on that if you dont hit with a law suit then they have learned nothing. lets see you go back to same local
Camperman2 1 week ago
@truthfrequency try doing more research, all media falls under commercial speech, check Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association, 436 U.S. 447 (1978). Also, no mater what state you are in, when you are issued a state I.D., and you sign your name to the dotted line, you agree to surrender or produce it to any local, state, or federal entity, the fourth amendment does not protect you from that due to the tenth amendement.
MrBigun1971 1 week ago
Also, you can be detatined LEGALY by any law enforcement agency if you refuse to produce proof of identification when requested until I.D. can be proven. Also, once you are detained, by supreme court ruleing, the person being detained and the immedeate area is allowed to be searched, that is something else the $th amendment does not protect you from.
MrBigun1971 1 week ago
When you want to make these claims and use court ruleings to try and make you like like a know it all, make sure you investugate the ones that will hurt you as well as the ones that will help you.
MrBigun1971 1 week ago
And before you try to open your mouth to big about me having the right or the knowledge to talk about this stuff, I spent 15 years putting my life on the line to protect those rights that you so flagerantly try to hide behind, and because of that, I have studied my constitution (oh, next time, try looking also at National security laws as well as DHS books)
MrBigun1971 1 week ago
@MrBigun1971
Well, I appreciate the time you've spent protecting our rights so I hope you appreciate the time I do as well. However it's very cut and dry. Anything that opposes the constitution is null and voice. The supreme courts have ruled as such. However, this case was dismissed with simple motion so the Federal judge agreed with my position 100%.
truthfrequency 1 week ago
@MrBigun1971: It is ILLEGAL for any law enforcement agency to detain you simply for refusing to produce proof of identification when requested, even when you are carrying ID. Read the U.S. Supreme Court case Hiibel v. Nevada.
DavidForthoffer 1 week ago
@MrBigun1971: The Fourth Amendment DOES prohibit a person being detained (but not arrested) from being searched, and from the immediate area from being searched. Read the U.S. Supreme Court case Terry v. Ohio.
You would have been right had you said "frisked for weapons if the totality of circumstances justify it" and "protective sweep...".
DavidForthoffer 1 week ago
@MrBigun1971: Even though you may have to consent to showing ID when asked in order to get the ID, police are not even allowed to detain you long enough to ask, unless they have a reasonable and articulable suspicion of criminal involvement. That IS your Fourth Amendment right.
DavidForthoffer 1 week ago
@MrBigun1971: You also misunderstand Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar Association (S.Ct.1978). The U.S. Supreme Court did NOT hold that all media falls under commercial speech. They ruled much more narrowly—commercial speech is not protected by the First Amendment. They actually held: 'We have not discarded the "common-sense" distinction between speech proposing a commercial transaction, which occurs in an area traditionally subject to government regulation, and other varieties of speech'.
DavidForthoffer 1 week ago
Man sheree really loves you man, she had such sad eyes when you got arrested.
shutta1hotmailcom 1 week ago
@truthfrequency an investigation can always turn into a terry stop. You shouldn't have given him any ammo. all he has to do is say he percieves you as a threat. Terrystop is now in play
macchef01 2 weeks ago
As I watch this vid, there is a barack 2012 ad at the top of the page.......thought all of us yters opinion didnt matter? "The 'online' community and their pesky, unrelenting legalization questions. They will be the downfall of us all! Just ignore em and maybe they'll go away.....that or we fraud the hell outta the voting results......."
AcompUter1812 2 weeks ago
COPS=SHIT
gansursa 2 weeks ago
Do not believe the BULLSHIT about Comet Elenin or Nibiru or the Mayan calender CRAP.
These so-called "scientists" are LIARS and are covering up the TRUE nature of our Universe.
The Earth is a Flat Disc and the heavens or Sky Dome stretch a mere 4000 miles up and rotate around the earth. THIS IS BIBLICAL. Think I'm a nutjob? LOL Keep on believing the Greek Math/Pagan Science that was proven FALSE 100s of years ago.
Check out my channel for more information about Flat Earth Theory.
FlatHorizon 2 weeks ago
@FlatHorizon
I'm not going to turn this into a debate on whether the earth is flat or not but I watched some of your videos with an open mind and I found no evidence to prove it and completely baseless claims. Furthermore, they fail to point to any other body in space that is flat. Everything is a sphere so why is the earth the exception? There is more evidence to support a hollow earth than a flat earth.
truthfrequency 2 weeks ago 3
@truthfrequency Thank you for your open-mindedness despite how ludicrous it might seem. I challenge you to find ONE peer-reviewed scientific study that proves the earth is a sphere. You will find countless experiments conducted over the past 100 years that prove the earth is flat.
Check out the homepage link on my channel for more information on these experiments.
Genesis 1:1 "In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth"
Heavens = more than 1
Earth = only 1
FlatHorizon 2 weeks ago
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool. If you really believe in this then why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this
from212 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool. If you really believe in this then why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this.
from212 2 weeks ago
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
from212 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
from212 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
from212 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
from212 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@FlatHorizon Instead of talking crap, spreading misinformation and making yourself look like a fool, why don't you buy a weather balloon and attach a Camera and GPS-enabled phone (such as an Android or iPhone) to it and let it float up to the stratosphere? At 50,000 Ft. altitude you will clearly see the round globe.
Proof here: /watch?v=Hz1ipDYpAgQ
Luckily we live in the modern age where it takes very little effort to disprove bogus claims like this... Just a balloon an a camera.
from212 2 weeks ago
Why are my comments not showing?
from212 2 weeks ago
@FlatHorizon holy shit you are truly a NEANDERTHAL! i cant believe people are as stupid as you are... how about you watch the video of footage from a U2 spy plane from 80,000 feet above see level... you can see the fucking contour of the earth, you can ORBIT the earth, because it is round you dummy! you are retarded...
kykahl 1 week ago
@kykahl: Don't feed the troll.
DavidForthoffer 1 week ago
@FlatHorizon are you retarded?
cutris1234 1 week ago
Comment removed
TribTrekker 1 week ago
@FlatHorizon Stop being an idiot please.
MrRyan23xx 1 week ago
@FlatHorizon obvious troll be trolling obviously
coldmateplus 1 week ago
Do not Fear my Brothers and Sisters WE WILL PREVAIL. For it is written:
Revelations 3:9
"I will make those who are of the synagogue of Satan, who claim to be Jews though they are not, but are liars--I will make them come and fall down at your feet and acknowledge that I have loved you."
FlatHorizon 2 weeks ago
Here's my thing, when you come looking for trouble, though you guys were in a legal right, you were asking for it. These guys are just doing their jobs that's it. And half you guys commenting are just rebelling for a reason that makes no sense to me. My grandchildren will not be slaves. I wake up everyday and work while still going to school, and people like you guys who just rebel just to get attention piss me off because you provoke these reactions by pissing people off.. If you show id they
thekidchris19 2 weeks ago
@thekidchris19
I take it they aren't teaching you the constitution in school or anything about the Patriot Act or the NDAA.Besides, I don't recognize the idea that some piece of paper with ink gives them a right impede on my unalienable rights (as endowed by my creator). If I don't have a right to do it to them, they don't have a right to do it to me. Simple, end of story. There is nothing to rebel against because their authority is an illusion. They are criminals with guns.
truthfrequency 2 weeks ago 5
@truthfrequency Honestly Chris idc about criminals w/ guns, but things won't change because you cause a scene somewhere.. If you wanna change this...run for a office dude. Cause what you're doing here got you locked up, your girl crying and they let you go yeah but what did you expect to gain from this? The truth? Dude the changers are in charge! They're not theorists running around getting arrested.
thekidchris19 2 weeks ago
@truthfrequency Exactly. If they can throw us to the ground why can't we?
joeu5431 1 week ago
@thekidchris19 The way to expose a tyrant is to make them act like one. Your argument is basically that you don't really need these silly rights, so you are just looking for trouble by pointing these instances out. This is a nation of laws. The law says that this young man broke no law, and was never even under suspicion of doing so. When these things get let go, they are like cancer. They spread, and they get bigger. Your mentality is leading your children right into despotism.
wreksangel 2 weeks ago
@thekidchris19 "Posterity, you will never know how much it cost the present generation to preserve your freedom. I hope you will make good use of it. If you do not, I shall repent in heaven that ever I took half the pains to preserve it." John Adams
PLEASE think about it.
wreksangel 2 weeks ago
@thekidchris19 If you don't excersise your freedoms, they get taken away. Right now they are already being taken away because police do not understand the law and act outside of their legal powers. There are examples all over the internet. I myself had a gun pulled on me at a simple traffic stop as soon as the officer exited the car. I did absolutely nothing to deserve having a gun pulled on me, and after I became upset at the event the cop didn't know why I was upset... Think or don't. IDC.
chisleu 2 weeks ago
@chisleu @wreksangel I look at the 50's and 60's and 70's and I say, hmmm they stood against what they couldn't change. Those protesters were beaten, or arrested even shot. So I'm not 'blind' I...I'm choosing to say FUCK THAT DRAMA. If you wanna change shit, get into a position where you can make changes. That's all I'm saying.
thekidchris19 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
sereneyoshiko 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@thekidchris19 The point is that unlawful rules have no authority if people " just doing their jobs" don't enforce them. The Nazis were just doing their jobs - I guess they deserved respect and nonprovocation? Why is it "asking for it" to ask questions of the gov who is spending our tax dollars watching everything we do without our permission and not making us any safer? THEY are paid by us - they should asnwer OUR questions. dont you see that?
sereneyoshiko 2 weeks ago
@thekidchris19 I disagree. There are people who go and harass these officers, get in their faces, scream at them, and that can impede their job. This guy is just asking polite questions and answering no to questions. They are questions because the officers know damn well that they can't FORCE you to do any of the things they asked, otherwise they wouldn't even ask the question. They are just sooo used to people handing their rights away and saying "Yes Sir!"
elfguy 2 weeks ago
They start robbing freedoms one by one....wake up people!!!
bigbaldbull82 2 weeks ago
do you realize this is just the beggining people!
JesuslovemeYesHedo 2 weeks ago
"So, uh... Do you listen to Art Bell?"....
FURTIVEMOVEMENT 2 weeks ago
Ooahhhh, a Happy Ending!
:)
JessesYuToob 2 weeks ago
@truthfrequency All I want to say is GOOD JOB! Police need to be held accountable for their actions. I can not believe there are states out there which made it illegal to video and audio record police officers, that is UNACCEPTABLE. I wish someone would take these states to court and get these laws stricken, they are unconstitutional.
TKE627 2 weeks ago
MARIJUANA LOVERS - Call & Listen ... 1-949-963-3422
The420following 2 weeks ago
Did you get out?
qing333 2 weeks ago
I love the Obama ad next to this video. Priceless.
NWBackcountry 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
"Ron Paul is a clean boat in a sea of garbage..."
Jonyrotn3 2 weeks ago
IN FREE COUNTRY ANY THINK WHAT YOU DO IS NOT LEGAL - ANY THINK WHAT THEY DO IS LEGAL and LEGAL FOR YOU IS ONLY PAY THEM MONEY ALL THE TIME and THEY ALWAYS RIGHT. THEY HAVE POWER TO DO WHAT EVER THEY WANT WITH YOU and YOUR FREE COUNTRY IS ONLY IN YOURS DREAMS ! ! !
MORES1971 2 weeks ago
There is way to much paranoia in this country...
soukupb 2 weeks ago
There is no such thing as the new world order, the frase was made up by Bush. The only thing that even comes close is American imperialism. If the video was shot in California and i was the fema agent i would haul your ass in claiming 5150.
aducimeH 2 weeks ago
@aducimeH
And that is why your children and your childrens children will live as slaves.
truthfrequency 2 weeks ago 14
@aducimeH do mankind a favour and die quickly.
biggmoneyme 2 weeks ago
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really.
aducimeH 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really.
aducimeH 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really
aducimeH 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really
aducimeH 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really
aducimeH 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really
aducimeH 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@biggmoneyme I'd like to wave my 4th amendment rights and call you a cumsucking retarded lowlife pig and then the 2nd amendment and kill you claiming anything really