The "leak" is from the piping while the fuel in the piping is from the pump. If the engine is shut off, the pump will also be shut off, and there is nothing to leak for the fire.
This is based on someone's personal experience in a similar situation. One engine of his B-25 bomber was on fire because of fuel leak caused by enemy ground fire. The plane landed carrying a torch. But after the engine was shut off, the fire went out by itself.
Current commercial aircraft pilots tend to act according to instructions from the tower including engine shutoff.
In this accident, I don't think the tower ever instructed the pilots to shut off the engine. In other words, I really doubt that the engine was still running and the pump was running, too, turning an incident into a disaster.
Thanks for ur comment, as I am not the flight crew, therefore my knowledge is from the final investigate report published by CAA (ROC). ps: the report can be download from the website, in both Chinese and English, I dont know if its up there still.. : ) everything u said can be possible. its difficult for us to tell just from watching this video.
I have no idea where was the fireman of Naha airport. they took at least more than 5 minutes to approach the air plan. Luckily, all the passengers were evacuated by emergency escape ladder. Both pilot and chief of fire dept. should be fired.
omg... I had never seen this before. That is exceptionally scary.... Why aren't their fire teams on sight? They should have been on the scene immediately. Is this a Chinese airport? Very dangerous and unprofessional.
Where were the Japanese emergency firefighters ??? Were they all got asleep ??? Shame on Japan Naha Airport ! This idiot airport did nothing, just waited to see the whole plane burnt down. What a shame !!!
I have to agree with you Shaun. With all those other planes at the gate, it's a miracle that the airport plus the planes didn't catch on fire. Holy Cow!
The control tower notified the pilot immediately after the plane touched down that one of the engines was on fire. These Japanese firemen should have been waiting/ready for the plane before it get out of the runway.
You'd think that China Airlines would learn something from that incident over Peng-hu in October 2002 when their 747-200 disintegrated in mid-air. Ha, here's the perfect proof that some people never learn. Want more? Just look at the way their PR person responded to the door coming lose incident.
Comment removed
IamStevenHaHaHa 5 months ago
@IamStevenHaHaHa 你真的那么想吗? 这也太次了吧? 没想到你会那么没脑,这架飞机不是中国的,是美国的。。。 出这样的事故,就是你们台湾人的问题,要不是就维修工差,要不是就飞行员问题。。。总之都是你们自己的过错,还赖到国人身上来,真没脸。。。
winsun96 2 weeks ago
華航丟臉丟到國外去
j87j8787 5 months ago
無法想像整個片長3:52 在3:18才看到消防車...無法相信這是日本
就像是東北311一樣日本政府對災後的應對真是慢半拍,什麼都要按規定...
苦的卻是災民
maxbiaggi7460 6 months ago
3:04 整個軟掉
消防車也來的太慢了吧 = =
abc5050956 7 months ago
消防スタッフ対応遅すぎ!!今回は中国機だったからよかったけど、もしANAやJALだったらどうしてくれるんじゃ!!
dkkuhy 8 months ago
沒半台消防車
focusing520 11 months ago
羽部分に燃料があって 爆発した瞬間に大きな火の玉
燃料が蒸発して引火
superitaikosyuu 11 months ago
Wondering if the pilots forgot to shut off the engine? When engine is shut off, oil pump will also be shut off.
CYTL1960 11 months ago
@CYTL1960
The engines are off already, the fire was caused by the fuel leak.
shaun91255 11 months ago
@shaun91255
Why are you so sure?
The "leak" is from the piping while the fuel in the piping is from the pump. If the engine is shut off, the pump will also be shut off, and there is nothing to leak for the fire.
This is based on someone's personal experience in a similar situation. One engine of his B-25 bomber was on fire because of fuel leak caused by enemy ground fire. The plane landed carrying a torch. But after the engine was shut off, the fire went out by itself.
(to be continued)
CYTL1960 11 months ago
@shaun91255
Current commercial aircraft pilots tend to act according to instructions from the tower including engine shutoff.
In this accident, I don't think the tower ever instructed the pilots to shut off the engine. In other words, I really doubt that the engine was still running and the pump was running, too, turning an incident into a disaster.
CYTL1960 11 months ago
@CYTL1960
Thanks for ur comment, as I am not the flight crew, therefore my knowledge is from the final investigate report published by CAA (ROC). ps: the report can be download from the website, in both Chinese and English, I dont know if its up there still.. : ) everything u said can be possible. its difficult for us to tell just from watching this video.
shaun91255 11 months ago
整備不良のテキトー王国 中華じゃ。なんでもテキトー。。。
kikihnl77 1 year ago
着陸してからの炎上だっけ?
それとも先に管制塔に危険があることを知らせてからの着陸?
伯父が那覇空港の管制官だからどんな対応したのか聞きたい。
sjzhat 1 year ago
中国は確かにテキトーな国だが、
機体作ってんのはアメリカのボーイングだよ。
よく調べてからチャイナエアラインがどうとか言えよな。
grandfinish 1 year ago
@grandfinish
「作った」のはボーイングでも「整備」をしてるのは中国だぞ?
keikyuvvvf 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
FUCK YOU CHINA!!!
V904T 1 year ago
I have no idea where was the fireman of Naha airport. they took at least more than 5 minutes to approach the air plan. Luckily, all the passengers were evacuated by emergency escape ladder. Both pilot and chief of fire dept. should be fired.
longhunter2 1 year ago 2
@longhunter2 Based on ICAO standard, the firemen response time must not exceed 2 minutes.
sands2003 1 year ago
不常識的一堆,
TheHackService 1 year ago
となりにANAが- - -
natureship 1 year ago
ANAの飛行機が煙かぶって可愛そう・・・w
AYATIDAISUKI 1 year ago
救護車來的也太慢了吧
greenmango77 1 year ago
空气污染严重==
JFeng299 1 year ago
不常識的一堆,
love24500 1 year ago
急に起きたアクシデントで、消防車到着までこれくらい時間がかかるのは適切らしい。
消防車も大型だからそんなに速度でないだろうし・・・
jr231217 1 year ago
但是華航有一點做很好
就是兩邊疏散的旅客非常平均
也就是說裡面的疏散動作精確
TaiwanDaniel 1 year ago
@TaiwanDaniel 這不是華航的問題,是旅客自己想跑拿裡。而且如果安全性高一點,根本不會有這種事發生。所以下次,搭長榮!!!!!!!!
eugene1999119 1 year ago
@eugene1999119 Eva is even worst!
sands2003 1 year ago
これのせいで朝煙臭かったwww
elt555like 1 year ago
omg... I had never seen this before. That is exceptionally scary.... Why aren't their fire teams on sight? They should have been on the scene immediately. Is this a Chinese airport? Very dangerous and unprofessional.
brentsrx7 1 year ago
@brentsrx7 It's a Japanese airport. Can you imagine?
CYTL1960 11 months ago
全日空比較好
anmelove 1 year ago
消防車来るのまじ遅い。カスだな。
そんでもって税金の無駄使いこんなに遅いのなんてありえない。
気持ちのねえ消防しなんんだなってこの遅さがものがたってるよね。
たるんでる。
hachimitukunni 1 year ago
みんな携帯でパシャパシャやってるな
poker112433 1 year ago
Poor mentenance made this circumstances.
Chinese products are often break.I think it has a connection to this.
NAXPRESS 1 year ago
「すごいねー」とか言ってるアホがいるよww
qazwsxeedc0852 1 year ago
消火器で消そうとしているけど、当然消えるわけがないよね。でもそれだけ気が焦っていたということだ。
GARAOKKUSU 1 year ago
この間チャイナエアライン乗ったら離陸前とか着陸前に携帯いじってる人だらけだった。
びくびくしながら乗ってたよ。
themiukou 1 year ago
華航的支那特技表演,解放軍怕不怕
tperobin 1 year ago
雖然華航也負有維修上的責任與確認的義務,此次飛機幾乎為原廠全新的情況下,華航在此次意外中算是個波音的替死鬼
shaun91255 1 year ago
yeah i remember that day i was just arrived Beijing and everbody scream when saw the news..
ViolaTsuchiya 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
人が必死で逃げてる所を携帯で写真撮ったりわらったりしてる人の神経が知れないわ。
NEC33333 2 years ago
china airlines = disaster
arlfs 2 years ago 3
Comment removed
puppy183 1 year ago
@arlfs IF IT HAPPENED IT HAPPENED
nelson514072 1 year ago
整備不良
Poor maintenance
维修不善
정비 불량
SHIZUOKA200KA2539 2 years ago 2
I am from Taiwan! This is true! I never take China Airline!! Never!!
s866217 2 years ago 3
Where were the Japanese emergency firefighters ??? Were they all got asleep ??? Shame on Japan Naha Airport ! This idiot airport did nothing, just waited to see the whole plane burnt down. What a shame !!!
twatlolita 2 years ago
Naha airport do not have enough training for the fire fighters because they are all rednecks in Okinawa Japan.
LittleAngus1014 2 years ago
我還不知道哪個機場有對於這種重大爆炸有所準備的, 這種情況真的太少見了, 機率大概一萬分之一吧, 一天幾千航班, 十年多少航班, 就華航發生這種事情, 這要怪當然是怪華航, 怎麼怪到日本機場去了? 這火災可不是兩台消防車花三十分鐘可以滅的
0204sexcity 2 years ago 2
@0204sexcity
那麼為什麼要在機場設消防隊呢? 這不就是為了爆炸 空難意外做準備?
而乘客都已經疏散完畢 影片跑了四分鐘消防車才來 這不是訓練不足是什麼?
當初新加坡航空在當時的中正機場05L 跑道發生意外時 中正機場消防隊只用了兩分15秒就到達指定位置。
shaun91255 1 year ago
Comment removed
DejayEGGo 1 year ago
@shaun91255沒錯!日本消防士在做什麼?躲在待命室看A片嗎?!況且當時是波音本身油管噴嘴設計問題...OK?!大檢也正常..要考慮的因素太多!幹嘛~大家都那麼厲害來應徵阿!快阿~很會說很會看...飛機都交給你們好了..全部都華航錯是哪招?失事率高是以前老空軍的年代(越擺越老職業倦怠)現在emd都是對外徵試的,少在那邊一竿子打翻一艘船!!!哪次檢修我不是想著要大家坐的安全?
DejayEGGo 1 year ago
@DejayEGGo不知道看看就好~不要扯一堆有的沒的
DejayEGGo 1 year ago
Comment removed
DejayEGGo 1 year ago
@DejayEGGo
1. 華航飛香港在澎湖上空解體的那架已證實是事故發生22年前一次不當的維修所致,難道華航維修是外包出去的?
2. "老空軍的年代"其實出事較少,因為"老空軍的年代"的空勤地勤都是在空軍有深厚經驗的,退役後才到華航.
華航從印尼回台灣在大園摔掉的那架,就是由First Officer進場落地,而他不是空軍飛行員出身,是國外的民航飛行班畢業,經驗總是差一點.
CYTL1960 11 months ago
@CYTL1960
1.澎湖空難的確是當時的華航維修不當, 但是否因為前一次的空難就來推斷這次也是華航的錯,犯了邏輯上的錯誤...
2. 不知道你所謂的老空軍年代包不包含前幾次重大的空難? 至從大舉培訓,錄用自訓機師以來華航的空安已經大幅改善...空軍是有經驗,但是也將大家詬病的學長學弟制帶到駕駛艙內, 為飛安重下隱憂, 如果FO 總是不執行落地, 怎麼有變成CP的一天?
shaun91255 11 months ago
ま た チ ャ イ ナ エ ア ラ イ ン か !
Lapiraz 2 years ago 14
你去告它詐欺吧
tw56p 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
感謝華航讓台灣推向國際舞台新聞
誰叫他.打著China Airlines 名義
騙台灣人叫華航
明明就唸.中國航空.China Airlines
中華航空因該唸Chinese Airlines
phs4321 2 years ago
Come on man, should JAL also called Japanese Airlines? dont be stupid please. You are a Chinese and this will never change even after you die.
LittleAngus1014 2 years ago
中華航空に乗るやつは、命知らず!
Kichijoji69 2 years ago
one question:Where was the firefighter when the tower had notified that the airplane had on fire???
cadstan3271 2 years ago
消防隊怎那麼久才出來滅火,還好裡面已經無人。
songclock 2 years ago
where was the firefighters ? they let the plane burning , imagine somebody did not manage to escape
tunkunrunk 2 years ago
I have to agree with you Shaun. With all those other planes at the gate, it's a miracle that the airport plus the planes didn't catch on fire. Holy Cow!
twflightservicemgr78 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
ざまぁwwwww
mig36su27 2 years ago
The control tower notified the pilot immediately after the plane touched down that one of the engines was on fire. These Japanese firemen should have been waiting/ready for the plane before it get out of the runway.
blackholechild 2 years ago
華航的出事率真的很高= =
TUFFY945 2 years ago 10
@TUFFY945 所以要搭長榮!!!!!!!!!
eugene1999119 1 year ago
CI always got problem..
But anyway,CI is a good airlines for me..
832121K3ito 3 years ago
The firemans came really late.
almost 4 mins since the fire came out.
No metter how, China Airlines did a good job that evacuated every person on board.
shaun91255 3 years ago 2
the firemans should improve their trainning , it is abnormal that they are too slow for such a big and modern airport
tunkunrunk 2 years ago
想早死的人可以搭華航! 恐怖喔!
ssssoossssssss 3 years ago
You'd think that China Airlines would learn something from that incident over Peng-hu in October 2002 when their 747-200 disintegrated in mid-air. Ha, here's the perfect proof that some people never learn. Want more? Just look at the way their PR person responded to the door coming lose incident.
Samurai1568 3 years ago
華航已經是一個不健全的企業文化,不良的管理團隊和不負責的航空公司的結果 。我從1998年已百分之百拒搭華航,從1998年到現在我每年一定提醒朋友,你們再看看好了,保證你華航每幾年一定要鬧人命,我、從來沒說錯過
allthewaythrough 4 years ago
there goes thier baggage
hawker445 4 years ago 2