There's far worse people on youtube I'm unsure why people over-react so much to him but without them he wouldn't be as interesting. I totally agree with his aims but am unsure why people go so OTT even if his methods will fail. Talking to kids =/= hurting them in any way. he idea filming kids hurts them is just an example of another taboo going too far like the nigger taboo did. Protecting kids is one thing but we smother them for a tiny risk, it's like an auto-immune disease at this point.
Getting kids to think about political or philosophical issues is important in my view.
HC lost my sub for his insane illogical reaction that actually hurts VB unlike the kids he films without giving him any explanation, even though HC seems so normal on other things.
The kids don't even seem that young, speech doesn't hurt people even if it offends them. 1 person being offended shouldn't stop people who want to chat talking. People CAN walk away.
They'd hate him if he didn't say sorry as much as if he did. They're looking at reality through their Dave-hate goggles. People just resort to personal attacks and emotions if you ask them. I don't think parents should have to consent before you talk to a kid about politics, just as I don't think a school should have to ask permission before telling them about evolution.
he literally has been beat up on IRL for his views too. He has problems, he needs help, but society are cunts for this.
@FederalistFilms Well, if you mean @ 2:00 where I say "illegal" then correct myself mid sentence, yes, I acknowledged that flagging is not illegal. I feel that the flags that have been filed are false because they don't violate TOS.
The main issue I feel you've not yet addressed is why you think that it's wrong to interview children. I'll check your past vids again but I'm pretty sure you've never addressed it.
There's no need for hostility (or blocking for that matter).
There's far worse people on youtube I'm unsure why people over-react so much to him but without them he wouldn't be as interesting. I totally agree with his aims but am unsure why people go so OTT even if his methods will fail. Talking to kids =/= hurting them in any way. he idea filming kids hurts them is just an example of another taboo going too far like the nigger taboo did. Protecting kids is one thing but we smother them for a tiny risk, it's like an auto-immune disease at this point.
unassumption 3 months ago
Getting kids to think about political or philosophical issues is important in my view.
HC lost my sub for his insane illogical reaction that actually hurts VB unlike the kids he films without giving him any explanation, even though HC seems so normal on other things.
The kids don't even seem that young, speech doesn't hurt people even if it offends them. 1 person being offended shouldn't stop people who want to chat talking. People CAN walk away.
I prefer Dave's old videos though.
unassumption 3 months ago
They'd hate him if he didn't say sorry as much as if he did. They're looking at reality through their Dave-hate goggles. People just resort to personal attacks and emotions if you ask them. I don't think parents should have to consent before you talk to a kid about politics, just as I don't think a school should have to ask permission before telling them about evolution.
he literally has been beat up on IRL for his views too. He has problems, he needs help, but society are cunts for this.
unassumption 3 months ago
@FederalistFilms Well, if you mean @ 2:00 where I say "illegal" then correct myself mid sentence, yes, I acknowledged that flagging is not illegal. I feel that the flags that have been filed are false because they don't violate TOS.
The main issue I feel you've not yet addressed is why you think that it's wrong to interview children. I'll check your past vids again but I'm pretty sure you've never addressed it.
There's no need for hostility (or blocking for that matter).
daedamot 5 months ago