Look at Dylan in the early sixities. The guy was androgynous. It would have been difficult to find an actor that could pull off the Bob Dylan of 1964.
I don't think Blanchett is attempting to precisely imitate Dylan. She's not an impersonator. She is attempting to capture something essential about Dylan, and portray that. Or, at least, portray her perception of Dylan's inner life.
I agree. Tilda's performance was not that stand-out in "Michael Clayton"; one can tell the Academy members were obviously voting for the film and not her performance. It made sense too, since Cate Blanchett won already (2004 - Best Supp. Actress - "The Aviator").
It would've been awesome if Cate won for Bob Dylan :D
@valerie16000 You have not seen the movie because of the non-likeness between Cate and Dylan? God!! If I'm right, i think this movie don't deserve to be watched by you...
all i gotta say is never have a women play a mans role .... i like how its all tripped out but when she comes out its kinda of pathetic they would have a girl play a guy . her voice still sounds like the fukin queen from golden age and they make bob dylan look stupid by makin him seem so fuckin wierd... if i were bob dylan i would b pissed to have a girl play my part
@valerie16000 I think you are forgetting that she is a woman. She did a fantastic job, I am usually one to think 'Oh that's *insert actor's name here* playing *insert characters name here* and I can't get passed that, knowing they are an actor playing someone. But she really did it.
Her first major stage role was opposite Geoffrey Rush in the 1993 David Mamet play Oleanna, for which she won the Sydney Theatre Critics' Best Newcomer Award
She's so right about Dylan. She and he are two of the greatest artists ever. She was brilliant in this (and everything else) - I must see it again. Shoulda won the Oscar but they aren't always too fair.
Hence why the Golden Globes have been better in past years (Cate Blanchett won for Elizabeth, Aviator, and I'm Not There in those respective years for Golden Globes.)
she was unbelivable.... just like she was in the aviator... she's one of the greatest actresses EVER... and i think it's a big scandal she didn't won... i was so sure... but i still hope that one day the people will realise that she is the greatest... and tilda swinton.. the movie was great but i wouldn't even have nominated her
let's pt it this way: the academy award judges who actually vote got it totally WRONG!!!! If you ask me, I thought Tilda Swinton deserved NOTHING!! she wasn't even that great in Clayton. Cate is one of those actors who simply is a chameleon. and the academy(judging how Jack Nicholson was robbed for outstanding performances such as in The departed and Five Easy Pieces) doesn't like that, very rarely do they. In other words, the try to make it tough, and go for certain things....
coz she already got oscar they didn't give her another one i think cate should've gotten SAG ruby dee made a tiny min cameo, not bout actin once a year 1person get award for actin sean penn was this year marion colltiard was 08 no on one esle got it for there actin penelope cruz COME ON how the hell was she even nomtied she didn't dereve her win at all she was very bad compaired to other shes most famous & lorel was sponser for oscar, this is there way of gettin them back as a sponser next year
Don't get me wrong, I think Tilda is a fine actress but Cate was robbed. I think it's pretty obvious which performance was more indellible. Oh well. Cate's performance is legendary and will be remembered, Tilda's will be forgotten. Cate lost out to Gwyneth in '99 but which performance is still being discussed to this day? Oscars are political, time will reveal the true winner.
oh man i could not agree with you more. i was literally livid when she was not announced. she acted swinton off the whole stage with her performance. it was unbelievable.
She totally deserved the Oscar, not friggin' Tilda Swinton. The only reason Swinton won is because she is a lesser known actress, and she's never won before. Personally, I think this is so stupid cause I was under the impression that Oscars were awarded to the best achievement in film for the year. It seems like lately they've just been distributing them so that everybody can have a turn. How is that fair? I've seen both films, and its pretty clear whose performance was better. (Cate's)
Pessoas conseguem ser estúpidas! enfim, ela virou minha atriz favorita depois desse filme
rollingBegonias 1 week ago
Look at Dylan in the early sixities. The guy was androgynous. It would have been difficult to find an actor that could pull off the Bob Dylan of 1964.
eckleburg22 2 weeks ago
I don't think Blanchett is attempting to precisely imitate Dylan. She's not an impersonator. She is attempting to capture something essential about Dylan, and portray that. Or, at least, portray her perception of Dylan's inner life.
eckleburg22 2 weeks ago
whats this crap,looks nothing like dylan,talks nothing like dylan,
keg64 2 weeks ago
Bob Dylan is transexual??
nasikremes 1 month ago
Um... I admire her for playing the role simply for the sake of the awesome roll.
But really? She clearly looks too feminine and her voice sounds it too.
awormyourhonor 2 months ago
@fumbler22
I agree. Tilda's performance was not that stand-out in "Michael Clayton"; one can tell the Academy members were obviously voting for the film and not her performance. It made sense too, since Cate Blanchett won already (2004 - Best Supp. Actress - "The Aviator").
It would've been awesome if Cate won for Bob Dylan :D
Wired4Life2 2 months ago
she is so talented.... and so pretty :)
musiicas 2 months ago
celebrities celebrating other celebrities.
naimkarakand 6 months ago 3
It idolizes her more than him.
dekzan 7 months ago
Comment removed
locomangoze 8 months ago
kate interpretou dignamente.Ela fez o melhor dela,qualquer artista ficaria orgulhoso ser homenageado por Kate.
373SEGMAR 8 months ago
@valerie16000 You have not seen the movie because of the non-likeness between Cate and Dylan? God!! If I'm right, i think this movie don't deserve to be watched by you...
MissMarysca 8 months ago
all i gotta say is never have a women play a mans role .... i like how its all tripped out but when she comes out its kinda of pathetic they would have a girl play a guy . her voice still sounds like the fukin queen from golden age and they make bob dylan look stupid by makin him seem so fuckin wierd... if i were bob dylan i would b pissed to have a girl play my part
greteltrejo 11 months ago
@greteltrejo well, I don't think we will ever going to see a movie about you anyways :)
Sweetforthesoul 3 months ago
God she has such an Aussie voice!
KirbyPownsYou 11 months ago
I agree, she sounds nothing like him. I didn't actually went to see the movie because of her.
valerie16000 1 year ago
@valerie16000 I think you are forgetting that she is a woman. She did a fantastic job, I am usually one to think 'Oh that's *insert actor's name here* playing *insert characters name here* and I can't get passed that, knowing they are an actor playing someone. But she really did it.
bonchatbonrat 1 year ago
cate's performance is fucking great....
while i was watching i thought i was watching bob dylan!!!!!
she's perfect!!!
GUNSizzyROSES 1 year ago
Just an unreal actress really.
TopDog69 1 year ago
She sounds nothing like him.
typeanoise 1 year ago
@typeanoise It's supposed to be a representation. Jackass.
savoirjoker 10 months ago
@savoirjoker
Yeah, and it was a shitty one.
typeanoise 10 months ago
@typeanoise Hmmm.. Ok.. And what are your opinions about the black kid? Was he a good representation? Key word being 'representation'.
savoirjoker 10 months ago
This woman can play anything. What's next, a bee? A brick? A pen?
MichaelJacksonFan000 1 year ago 14
@MichaelJacksonFan000 hahaha :D I'm pretty sure that if she play a pen it will be the best one we'll ever see! XD
Googaify 1 year ago 4
@MichaelJacksonFan000 A STAPLER! Rated PG-13.
esclave 1 year ago
oh my gosh. cate is amaazing!! LOVE her.
uptownxgirlx 1 year ago
Guess why I have my YouTube name? :D
CauseIAmNotThere 1 year ago
Her first major stage role was opposite Geoffrey Rush in the 1993 David Mamet play Oleanna, for which she won the Sydney Theatre Critics' Best Newcomer Award
gonadotropicfrus 1 year ago
In 2006, she starred in Babel opposite Brad Pitt, The Good German with George Clooney and Notes on a Scandal opposite Dame Judi Dench
mineralogyom 1 year ago
Cate Blanchett is a real professional ;) One of best actresses I ever seen!
wafelbysio 1 year ago 6
Comment removed
longliverock1973 2 years ago
How is the song called?
TheSinamaus 2 years ago
@TheSinamaus "Like A Rolling Stone"
PrivChurch 2 years ago
It's not LIKE a great work of art, it IS a great work of art!
94lukepl 2 years ago 5
@94lukepl
I think that's what she meant.
Rossonero072213 6 months ago
OMG. awesomeness. .
snowfairy13 2 years ago
Cate Blanchett deserved the Best Supporting Actress Oscar for this amazing performance.
KellyGreen5555 2 years ago 8
shouldn't she have recieved a best supporting ACTOR award?? :)
oehieze 1 year ago 7
Comment removed
scotthectic 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
PENIS
sharpie99111 2 years ago
love her
felixfelicis 2 years ago 3
kate blanchet was by far the person that acted as bob dylan
googurll09 2 years ago 12
maaan!!!!cate blanchett is just amazing..couldnt understand wer she was i d muvi until d credits came..she was horrendously good!
daveprof 2 years ago 4
dude her voice is just like his in this movie fuckin amazing
ondeal33 2 years ago 43
She's so right about Dylan. She and he are two of the greatest artists ever. She was brilliant in this (and everything else) - I must see it again. Shoulda won the Oscar but they aren't always too fair.
BridgesGoddess 2 years ago 13
i had no idea this was her until the credits
she was that good
dowhat93 2 years ago 8
Hence why the Golden Globes have been better in past years (Cate Blanchett won for Elizabeth, Aviator, and I'm Not There in those respective years for Golden Globes.)
adrianpansky 2 years ago 4
cate blanchett is a very good actress
march14star 3 years ago 11
when r the academy awards?
ThisRealBobDylan 3 years ago
search bob dylan Post productions are the best versions of the greatest songs of bob dylan
velvetgoldmine4400 3 years ago
It's time I put this out into the void;
does Cate's Dylan remind ANYONE ELSE of Shane? (if the answer is "yes", you know exactly who I'm talking about ;P)
Weirfan69 3 years ago
Shane McCutcheon, right ? They look handsome ... ?
CateElite 3 years ago
yayy! handsome indeed :)
Weirfan69 3 years ago
Totally! First association.
cartoonova 3 years ago
i still can't belive she didn't won.....
she was unbelivable.... just like she was in the aviator... she's one of the greatest actresses EVER... and i think it's a big scandal she didn't won... i was so sure... but i still hope that one day the people will realise that she is the greatest... and tilda swinton.. the movie was great but i wouldn't even have nominated her
MovieManiac80 3 years ago 9
let's pt it this way: the academy award judges who actually vote got it totally WRONG!!!! If you ask me, I thought Tilda Swinton deserved NOTHING!! she wasn't even that great in Clayton. Cate is one of those actors who simply is a chameleon. and the academy(judging how Jack Nicholson was robbed for outstanding performances such as in The departed and Five Easy Pieces) doesn't like that, very rarely do they. In other words, the try to make it tough, and go for certain things....
latona2205 3 years ago 6
coz she already got oscar they didn't give her another one i think cate should've gotten SAG ruby dee made a tiny min cameo, not bout actin once a year 1person get award for actin sean penn was this year marion colltiard was 08 no on one esle got it for there actin penelope cruz COME ON how the hell was she even nomtied she didn't dereve her win at all she was very bad compaired to other shes most famous & lorel was sponser for oscar, this is there way of gettin them back as a sponser next year
vegrox 2 years ago
Don't get me wrong, I think Tilda is a fine actress but Cate was robbed. I think it's pretty obvious which performance was more indellible. Oh well. Cate's performance is legendary and will be remembered, Tilda's will be forgotten. Cate lost out to Gwyneth in '99 but which performance is still being discussed to this day? Oscars are political, time will reveal the true winner.
fumbler22 3 years ago 66
fumbler22 I could not have siad it better myself!
dylannowandforever 3 years ago
@fumbler22 she was robbed three times. Imo she should have 3 or even 4 Oscars for:
1. Aviator (she finally got it)
2. Elizabeth
3. I'm not there!!!
4. Elizabeth: The Golden Age!!!
how's it possible she didn't win?!?!?! it is UNBELIEVABLE!
Googaify 1 year ago
OMG! I can't believe it she didn't win oscar this year.she totally deserved it,definitely not that pale-look tilda swinton..
I hate Oscar this year!
calciumkid85 3 years ago 6
oh man i could not agree with you more. i was literally livid when she was not announced. she acted swinton off the whole stage with her performance. it was unbelievable.
trippleH21 3 years ago 7
She totally deserved the Oscar, not friggin' Tilda Swinton. The only reason Swinton won is because she is a lesser known actress, and she's never won before. Personally, I think this is so stupid cause I was under the impression that Oscars were awarded to the best achievement in film for the year. It seems like lately they've just been distributing them so that everybody can have a turn. How is that fair? I've seen both films, and its pretty clear whose performance was better. (Cate's)
000142721 3 years ago 9