Thank God he came aound to give the shoot down order some thirty-forty minutes later when on Air Force One right. It's just despicable how anyone can buy this as stupidity on his behalf. It's stalling by acting stupid.
@HurburBurbur No, Cheney has already admitted it was HE, not Bush, who finally gave the shoot down order (supposedly) after the fourth plane had already crashed in Shanksville.
I should perhaps been a little bit clearer. The first actual defense decision of Bush was to at Air force One after a discussion with Cheney issue an order of shoot down of any nonresponding jetliner. You have the story told in documentaries such as the "9/11: Day That Changed The World" and "George W. Bush The 9/11 Interview" both of 2011. The point was merely to illustrate the passiveness, stalking, of W. Who really ran the show that day was of course Cheney, the mastermind of 9/11.
Bill Maher can kiss off. The president handled it fine. He had people underneath him taking care of the first few moments. We have military too who were watching the shores of this country.
i am not a bush apoligist, nor a hater, but he better regret what he didin't do at that moment(i know if i would have done that i would have, bitterly). I know it was shocking and one doesnt know what to do, but he's the president. He should've interrupted it calmly, and tell them he was leaving due to an emergency. There is nothing wrong with telling the children what is going on, Im sure many teachers around the US even showed their students the events.
Had he done something, he still would've been criticized. Of he walked out calmly, they would've criticized him for walking out in the middle of the children's lesson. If he would've ran out, he'd be criticized for scaring the kids. Same with any president, dem or republican, he handled it the way he wanted to handle it, in a lose lose lose situation in regards to criticism. He handled it nonetheless, so i can care less. What would Obama would've done? Sat there making a damn speech again?
@Katapax Sorry, but that's nonsense and I can prove it. No one criticized Rudy Giuliani for going down to Ground Zero and organizing emergency response efforts. Just the opposite, people on both sides praised him.
Attacking someone no matter what they do... that's a hallmark of the Right, not the Left. Hell, Obama wasn't even in Washington yet and you already criticized him over some absurd reaction that you THINK he MIGHT have had.
@BI30 You are a typical Libtard B130. the dems have attacked people that don't even want to run for president like Rush Limbaugh. The dems attacked Bush for the country going broke when it was fannie may and freddy macs fault. The dems attacked Bush until he submitted to the stimulus package that didn't work and he told them it wouldn't. Just because the RIGHT states facts does not mean we are attacking you, don't get so offended when we say the truth.
@MysteryDru Rush is a political pundit. He attacks Dems regularly. Do you believe the fact he's not a politician immunizes him from criticism? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are PRIVATE CORPORATIONS. They USED to be government run years ago, but Republicans cut them lose and deregulated them. Fannie/Freddie... which you just criticized... are perfect EXAMPLES of the failure of Conservative economics. Bush never passed a Stimulus. He passed a "tax rebate" and the Bank Bailout. So much for your facts.
@BI30 It was a tax rebate he passed so the dems would shut up about the stimulus package which they in turn pushed through anyways. Fannie/Freddie both gave out too many loans to people who could not pay the bills which crashed the housing market. They were gov't run until bush turned them loose. Private corps are better than anything the gov't has ever run. example SOCIAL SECURITY, fannie/freddie, public schools, etc.. Conservative economics trashes any liberal thoughts.
@MysteryDru I really don't even need to reply to your latest bit of nonsense since every "fact" you listed was pulled straight from your hindquarters, easily debunked with a 5 second Google search. Bush's "tax rebates" took place before Dems retook Congress in '07. You might want to tell Bear/Stearns that it was all Fannie's fault. SocSec hasn't missed a check in 70 years and is running a SURPLUS. Though, if you're a product of public schools in the last 20 years, you may have a point there.
@BI30 Social security is a joke. You pay soo much into it your whole life and receive back a miniscule amount of money. It is just a way for the government to redistribute wealth in a sense. It should be privatized. and Why is it that fanny/freddie is now 80% owned by american taxpayers and we are dumbing up to 160billion$ to an estimated 1trillion into their bailout? Yes his tax rebates were before congress in '07 but I am talking about Feb 8 08 stimulus package to shutup Pelosi!
@MysteryDru I would have stopped responding days ago, but as you become more & more unhinged, you start pulling stuff out of your butt that are just too stupid to let pass.
The biggest criticism the GOP has of SocSec is that it is "going bankrupt" because it "pays out FAR MORE than it takes in." That's why they want to raise the retirement age. But YOU are trying to argue SocSec pays out "too LITTLE". And your "solution" is to hand it over to the same people we just had to bailout for $750B???
@BI30 why raise the retirement age over and over again if it is not in debt? and It does pay out too little to the retired! Privatize it! and we wouldn't be letting Fanny/freddy run it,rather people like Donald trump! who knows how to make money with money! It could be a trust fund of sorts that you pay into but don't use until you retire or are injured or lose your job!Why does my money need to go to a gov't office for them to give it partially back IF I retire?SocSec is idiocracy at its finest
@MysteryDru "Over and over again"? I want what you're smoking. The retirement age has NEVER been raised. Fannie/Freddie don't run SocSec, but you clearly WANT them to after the wonderful job they did cratering Wall Street. THAT'S the people you've be handing SocSec over to by privatizing it. Trump has filed bankruptcy five times. Meanwhile, your SocSec taxes are invested in Treasury Bonds... the safest investment on the planet.
@BI30 I AM TALKING FULL RETIREMENT BENEFITS! I can only receive it in full at age 67.My grandpa got his at 65.that is raising age for full benefits.it is even on the ssa website! and I dont want fanny/freddy running socsec I want business men like trump and wynn who KNOW HOW TO MAKE MONEY BY USING MONEY! I want all my money back that I put into SS, not a partial ammount! making private and running it like a trust fund(of sorts) would benefit Americans more! and there wouldnt be gov't involved
@MysteryDru The later you retire, the larger your checks will be, but that's not new. You can retire as early as 62 if you accept a considerable cut in your monthly benefit. The age at which you can apply for benefits hasn't changed in the 76 year history of the program. If you don't like having to wait until 67 for "maximum" benefits, thank a Republican. And again, I remind you that Trump has gone bankrupt five times, and both Trump & Wynn make their money running casinos.
@BI30 Right, a cut in my benefits, meaning "Don't retire too early, or we will keep more of your money!" and Trump has not gone Bankrupt 5 times, his companies have and he just readjusted his debt and is paying it off himself or with his other companies. and Wynn/Trump do own casinos and Resorts, but that is not the only business they deal with! It is blatant that these two know how to make and manage money, thats why they are rich, so yes I still would want them(or ppl alike) to run SocSec!
@MysteryDru You would simply receive a smaller check each month, but you could (and many do) eventually receive more money in return they you paid in Think of 67 as saving for two extra years, then adding that savings to each check. The government (unlike privatization) isn't "profiting" off your investment.
And claiming the companies Trump ran went bankrupt but not Trump himself is just stupid. Trump was born rich. Wynn's dad ran a chain of bingo parlors. Is that where to invest your SocSec?
@BI30 You're taking what I am saying out of context. They know how to make money by using money. So what if Trumps companies had bankrupted? He still managed to make more money while fixing his debt. I want people like Wynn/trump who know how to invest/manage money properly to run a privatized SocSec. How do you know that the gov't doesn't benefit from our money being in SS? You should really read what Michael Tanner said about it and what will happen here very soon!
@MysteryDru This is so far off the subject, I think we can end this here. No one is about to entrust the $2T SocSec trust fund to a guy that has a track record of bankruptcy. Trump was able to "comeback" because banks and private investors were willing to mortgage his personal assets to fund his comeback. Trump can't cover $2T in loses. As for "how do I know the gov isn't "profiting" off the SS money? Because I'm not an idiot and know what a T-Bill is.
@BI30 OMFG! can you not read?! obviously not. I said people LIKE! trump/wynn, PEOPLE WHO KNOW how to manage /invest/make money. and if you think for one second that the gov't is not using the income of people paying into SocSec then you are completely ignorant. T-bills are a way for other countries to invest in our nations debt, which in my eye is them taking control of our country to a point. China is the top holder of U.S. Treauries. we just need to privatize SocSec, that's it.
@MysteryDru OMFG? Really? After defending Trump, you're surprised I pointed out why he.(and people like him) aren't the amazing money mangers you believe them to be? Can you name ANYONE suited to manage a $2 TRILLION dollar program that doesn't run a casino or needed to be bailed out by the FedGov? And just because you THINK SocSec is cashing in Treasury bonds (where? On the black market? And doing WHAT with them exactly?) doesn't make it so. This conversation is over. Reply & you'll be banned.
@BI30 I can name several people. And seeing how you are threatening on banning me goes to show that I am right and you are wrong. 3 working people pay for one retired person, when SocSec started it was over 100 ppl, and soon enough it will be 2-1. Plus the people who die before receiving their "benefits" from socsec where do you think that money goes? to the gov't, they may give some to the families but not all of it. Privatize SocSec and watch it create jobs as well as wealth.
@MysteryDru "I can name several people". And yet, in your final post, you don't name a single one. Call me skeptical. The fact you think my bringing this idiotic conversation with a 22 year old child to a close "proves you're right" despite allowing you to blather on for two weeks, only further calls your maturity into question. Where does that SocSec money go? I think we already established that: T-bills. It collects interest until you need it. What a way to waste your last post. Buh bye.
@MysteryDru "I can name several people". And yet, in your final post, you don't name a single one. Call me skeptical. The fact you think my bringing this idiotic conversation with a 22 year old child to a close "proves you're right" despite allowing you to blather on for two weeks, only further calls your maturity into question. Where does that SocSec money go? I think we already established that: T-bills. It collects interest until you need it. What a way to waste your last post. Buh bye.
@MysteryDru Oh, and as for why Fanny is now "80% owned by the government"... see my previous comment about the "bailout" of Wall Street.
On the Feb '08 "Stimulus"... you mean those $150B in TAX BREAKS Bush agreed to? If you're arguing it wasn't a Stimulus, we've finally found a point of agreement. CORPORATE TAX CUTS ARE NOT STIMULATIVE.
@BI30 TO A POINT! corporate tax cuts do work but will never be as effective as cutting the fed income tax. Corp cuts allow the companies to hire more and research and develop new products faster which in turn stimulates business, prototypes need parts produced by other companies and so on.how are you going to say he never passed a stimulus when I just told you he did in 2-8-08?he did the bank bailout because of fanny/freddy debacle and gave tax cuts while fighting 2 wars.
@MysteryDru I actually agree w/you (to a point) that middle class tax cuts (fed income tax) are more stimulative than corp tax cuts, but the fact is, not only does cutting *corporate* taxes not help, they actually HURT the economy and job growth. All you described, hiring, investing, etc, happen when they REINVEST to AVOID paying those taxes. They POCKET the savings when their taxes are cut. As for Feb'08 & Obama'09, YOU argued the Stimulus didn't work. Both were most all cuts. And here we are.
you know i tend to agree that him sitting for 11 minutes after hearing of the second plane crash as bizzare, but dont fault him for continuing his "photo-op" initially when the first plane crashed, at the time nobody knew much , people assumed it was a small plane, the full extent of the tragedy hit people after the second plane, why did bush continue doing what he did, i dunno, maybe because he just didnt know what to do and was looking to his aides to tell him what to do who were clueless too
@Pedofied It appears you... like so many Bush apologists before you... didn't even watch the video before commenting, and missed the BIG RED BOX directing you to watch the Response before commenting.
@BI30 Your way to harsh on him and hell I'm not even a george bush fan hell I'm canadian I hate some of the moves he made during his presidency but this was not his worst
@Pedofied Considering that The Commander in Chief, the highest ranking law enforcement official in the nation, and "leader of the free world" sat there like a moron with his thumb up his butt; I'm really hoping your comment was a joke.
The whole discussion about the US gouvernment being involved in 911 to create a faked reason for war is ridiculous. I guess that the US would not do this in the first place. And 911 was far too big and expensive. But just the right size if someone else wanted to draw the US into a costly war where they can make a lot of new enemies. And Al Qaida could not have done this without the help of a secret service outside the US. Check out my channel and homepage.
@wwwtotalitaerde Oh yeah you dont think our goverment wouldnt do this, then you know nothing. Search "operation northwoods" then tell me they wouldnt do this. God I hate stupid people
@bobsizzz Operation Northwoods was DECLINED by President Kennedy.And it largely consisted of recommendations to FAKE incidents.Without causing real victims
So its just as I wrote.As a justification for a war you use fake incidents causing only minor damage. 911 caused about 3000 real deaths and inflicted major damage on the US economy
You just dont do things like 911 to get a reason for a war.Blowing up US embassies or the attack on USS Cole would have been far beyond what is necessary for war
@wwwtotalitaerde Oh Jesus you are missing the point. The point is that they did plan doing that. And using supposedly high jacked aircraft doesnt that sound familiar? These people dont care who gets killed. I see there is no hope in you waking the fuck up. You clearly read what our goverment proposed to do. Now if they would have went with there plan you dont think thousands of innocent lives would have been lost? You are one dumb fuck. I am done even responding to your dumb ass
@bobsizzz But one thing is strange. The possibility that the brainwashing and steering techniques described on my homepage and on my channel may have been used on 911, never was openly discussed.
ok be smart about this....i dont think bush was a really good president but he was all the way in florida....what in the world could he have done and when the country is under attack...the job of the secret service is to keep the president safe....im just sayin what the hell did any of you do when it happened
@BangaMuzikReel ok wat could he have said, it isnt like if he would have said something the "terrorist would have turned the second plane around.....wow a lot of people are still under the impression that the president has the last word in this country...in that situation no one could do anything except for the firefighters,policeman and the civilians that where there trying to save as many lives as they can...be realistic....wat cud have bush done to help at that moment in time ......nothing
@BI30 The way you treat people in the comments is disappointing. You seem like a left-wing nut job to me and you show disrespect to a president that was not really that bad. Seeing as you responded to my comment in minutes you care a lot for this propaganda spreading video with little minuscule persuasive power.
@zunedog31 Are you REALLY going to criticize my treatment of people after calling me an "idiot"? I treat people the same way they treat me and other readers. Deal.
As for Bush, he was the most miserable president since Hoover. Economic disaster, turned a Surplus into a doubling of the debt, invaded another country with lies, dismissed OBL SIX MONTHS after 9//11, failed to end either war, gas hits $2/$3/$4 a gallon for the first time in history, turned U.S into nation that excuses torture......
@lonewolf2379 You didn't wake up at all you fell back asleep. This goes much deeper than this but since you cant even figure out the obvious I will not even attempt to show you how deep this goes. Good day to you and I hope you wake back up
in my opinion i kinda think did bush did the right thing by not freaking out in front of the kids..however..i think 7mins way too long to just sit there
@EHS1234356 You are an idiot. When your country is supposedly under attack and you are the commander in chief you jump up and do your fucking job. You try and prevent thousands of other possable deaths instead of worrying about what a class of kids think. You do not owe the kids an explanation why you got up and left the classroom. You just quietly get up and leave. The secret service could tell the teacher the president has important bussinesss to attend to and tell her nothing more period.
@iwillavengeyou No its not unbelivable what you say is the truth. Also Jet fuel burns around 600 F and steel doesnt begin to weaken till around 1100 F. This was totaly an inside job, it is clear as day with anyone that has half a brain cell. Just google "operation northwoods" you will see a smimular situation that our goverment admits to.
@bobsizzz wow, just read op. northwoods on wiki. domestic terrorism from our own gov. to start a war w/ cuba. this could be the same thing in the future just to get in the middleast for some oil. wow some things are crazy....
@iwillavengeyou I am glad that opend your eyes a bit. That same tactic was used on 911. Wasn't operation northwoods eerily simular to 911? The US has used false flag operations for every war we have been in. The CIA under Clinton when he was govener of Arkansas was running military weapons to the Nicaraguan contras out of Mena Akansas airport using Military C-123 cargo planes. They sold the weapons to the contras then flew to Columbia and loaded the plane full of cocaine and flew back to Mena.
Bill Maher? Yeah He is a great source of insight and knowledge on how to be in the most difficult position of leadership at the most difficult time. The POTUS does not personally sit in front of a radar screen watching for inbound ICBMs, there are thousands of military personell doing that.
@MrDominicbrandon So you're saying that sitting there until someone tells him that "missiles are on their way" was the best use of his time at that moment?
i jdon't get it....what does legend519 mean by this video being 'biased'?
is that someone who just looks like bush sitting there with a blank face?
and the message whispered in his ear was that....' he was doing great with those kids, and he should keep on doing it because everything was hunky-dory in our nation?'
@legend519 If you clicked on this video expecting a "news" report, you're not too bright. OF COURSE "this video is biased". I think The Commander-in-Chief sitting motionless in a classroom after being told the country was "under attack" is deserving of criticism. Don't you?
i just love how everyone can put them selves in bush's shoes and say "i would have excused myself and left calmly". yeah fucking right. hearing "uh... were at war", out in a public place were your life may now be in danger, i bet you wouldent have frozen up and shit your pants eather. no one is ready to hear that news.
@BI30 i did. im not a "bush apologist". but ive also never been the president and heard "hey. were at war. and theres at least one person in the world right now who wants you dead enough to actually kill you." so i cant say how i would react. but thanks for your snarky ass reply to my comment instead of trying to see things from another angle.
@TheLateKnight4785 My "snarky ass reply" is in response to four years of apologists trying to defend Bush for his (lack of a) reaction that morning. If THAT is how he reacts in an emergency, maybe he shouldn't have signed up to be "Commander-in-Chief" of the most powerful nation on Earth? I'm not fan of Rudy, but isn't it funny how HE didn't sit motionless and paralyzed with fear when HE heard the news. And that morning, MY first reaction was to look for a TV to get more information.
@BI30 your first reaction was to look for a tv to get more info. rudy didn't sit paralyzed with fear and lept into action. neither one of you was in a school full of people you've never seen before wondering if a sniper didn't have his bead directly on your forehead. im not trying to make excuses for the downie. but dammit theres other ways to look at things i see your point. what im wondering is why you cant see the other points.
@TheLateKnight4785 The difference is Bush was the COMMANDER IN CHIEF of a country he was just told was "under attack", and your defense is that a man surrounded by the most elite security force known to man didn't react because he might of been concerned for his personal safety? If you're STILL wondering why I am unable to "see things from HIS perspective", then you don't get it and never will. There is NO justification for his inaction that morning.
@BI30 i guse not. i only hope some day your the most powerful person in the country and something like this happens again so we can see what you actually do. ill be at home going "oh well. it happened. nothing we can do now except wait and see what were gonna do now." just like i did with this.
@TheLateKnight4785 While you're at home hoping for another 9/11 just see how I'd react as Commander-in-Chief, I'll stay here thanking God it won't be you.
NINE11 was a sacrificial ritual and the idol of worship was the queen of heaven(statue of liberty).Pay close attention to bush,the teacher and children synchronizing witchcraft and saying the words KITE(controlled plane)PLANE,HIT,STEEL,MUST.Then seconds later bush is notified of plane impact.The children bow while picking up their pet goat book.The pet goat is the baphomet(satan).The witch lady begins a beat and Mr.Bush sits there while people are jumping to their deaths.What evil did they see?
@8bebe8 you're an idiot. you have no idea how magicks work. learn2pagan christfag. i did not know kite ment controlled plane. you your saying the spell goes "controlled plane plane hit steel must'. kinda hard not to bow wile picking up something. the book had nothing to do with goats retard. watch yourself next time you read (implying you actualy read) and i bet you catch yourself tapping something.
@TheLateKnight4785 we can go back and forth talking shit but i would rather not so do what you do best biatch ridicule people all you want say disrespectfull words tough guy.SOME YOUTUBERS ARE PATHETIC............what are the fucking odds of the kids saying thoes key words watch the tape not the edited ones you goof like FARENHEIGHT 911
@8bebe8 no. just a pissed off druid wondering why all Christians think there experts on things that existed long before there "religion" did. it takes months of preparation to pull off any spell. not just some tapping and "key words". oh and doing magicks like this in a public place, let alone wile on camera, normally causes the one preforming it to come accost misfortune. do a bit of research before you open your mouth next time... goof....
@TheLateKnight4785 goof...im not even christian you retard, but soon to be. I certainly wouldnt want to be a pagan devil worshipper like you goof. Have a nice day promote love.
@8bebe8 Wow it is nice to see someone that sees the real truth. You are spot on. Also if you look at the picture with the girl standing between the two stars they are upside down and also Bush is holding the book upside down. If you look at George washingtons statue of him sitting it is the same pose as the baphoment. 99% of the people cannot belive our goverment orchastrated this let alone this goes way deeper than that like you said a sacrificial ritual. God Bless you
All he had to do was announce: Excuse Me. Then proceed out into the hall and into the limo for further briefing then one of his assistants could have sat in for him and quietly told the teacher that there was a national emergency and the President had to leave immediately and I think she would have understood. He looks like he was going into shock and was trying to control his reaction to the news.
It clearly states in the paper, published in 2000, called "Rebuilding America's Defenses" by the Project for the New American Century, that the only way to get an increased military budget and the political and public consensus needed to invade Iraq was by " some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbour" One year later the very "event" took place. On the back of it, the pentagon was given a blank cheque and a license to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. No coincidence!
You people need to get a life. What could he have done? Darted in front of the next plane? He was probably told a plane struck the first tower, not that it was terrorists. At that point it wasnt clear that it even was terrorists.
Can you imagine how the children would have felt if he had just leaped up and dashed out? I never heard of Bush hearing about the first plane in the limo. I always thought he was told by the secret service.
I'm sorry. I never liked Bush. I just don't believe in all the conspiracies. Not that I blithely believe everything I've been told; but no human being would have just ignored that kind of thing. And while Bush was an idiot, he was a human being with a job he knew needed to be done.
@2thatonegirl16 Ihave to wonder about anyone that thinks Bush's ONLY alternative was to "leap up and rush out of the room" as opposed to simply excusing himself as having "President things" to do.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology and civil engineers all accept the fact that a jet impact at high speeds along with the fires it caused led to the collapse of the WTC, not demolition. So unless any of you conspiracy theory enthusiasts are engineers, I'm gonna trust them, and my major, civil engineering.
how is something that takes weeks of prep and arrangement, suppose to possibly get done in a matter of minutes?? the only way that was done if they already had the bombs in place. which also means they KNEW this would happen. People inside the WTC buildings, the ones who actually got out and survived, they said they heard bombs go off. the plane, that hit the building, the 'plane', was said to have sounded like a missle. And you ask how this could have been done without anyone seein
@sshers1 Dude wake up from your ignorance. 9/11 was not planned. Those "bomb sounds" was just the plane engine exploding. And that plane was not a freaking missile. They found plane parts and there is evidence of the plane's take off from an airport. Also, try consulting the Civil Engineers and scientists about this. You'll notice that they all say that it was a plane that crashed into the building.
Stop with your Alex Jones crap. Jones is an idiot who doesn't know what they heck he's saying.
so what your saying is you like any other person with a brain can see that this was all known therefore who is responsible? anyway man im done because not everyone was meant to have there eyes open to truth, the bad guys are gonna need an army too
@Salamlakim1212 As I said earlier, this is my video and have no reason sit back while you attack me because what I tell you doesn't fit in with your questionable reality. You have been blocked.
@Salamlakim1212 The claims of "traces of thermite" have two substantial flaws:
1) They did not find traces in the quantities that would be required to implode two buildings of that size.
2) Thanks to the chemical soup of materials found in that building, I'm surprised they didn't find traces of King Tut's Tomb.
And unless you're a nut that believes the planes were holograms, how would they of known EXACTLY where the planes would strike so as to know exactly where to plant the explosives?
@BI30 buddy you have the footage and still cant see....how does a alluminum plane slice through metal as was the result after it hit? wake up man the kids where reading, KITE, HIT,STEEL,PLANE,MUST, and reading the The Pet Goat, He knew, THEY knew, and then made it look like Bush is a product of our school system not teaching us how to respond to issues like an adult,so pretend to sit there like a freakin kid, suckin his thumb, reading a kids book, LMAO, ya cause Bush was raised just like me and
@Salamlakim1212 I love it when people that don't understand the science behind something try to assert "facts". It's like when Bill O'Reilley suggested no one has yet to explain what causes the tides.
Have you ever seen a piece or straw driven through a palm tree by a tornado? You might remember from your High School physics class that Force = Mass * Acceleration. Then again, you may not.
@BI30 you rite???LMAO his dad was the president for christ sake and they own oil, this man has seen it All you hear me, he is a Master manipulater, a Master con artist, Master sociopath, PURE EVIL is his heart and soul, as is for the rest of those "heads" of the world, i pray for your sake when its war in the streets you know what side to take, and that goes for all americans because this country is headed to civil war inevitibley
@Salamlakim1212 There is a difference between saying Bush "let" it happen and claiming Bush "made" it happen.
Not moving in the classroom is not "proof" he was behind it. AT MOST, it might suggest he "knew" it was coming and let it happen anyway. "Personal interpretations of observations" is not "proof". It's "speculation". For something to be "proof", it can't be used as evidence of a competing theory.
all educated people know Bush was behind 911. how anyone can refute the controlled demolition is beyond me. its as clear as day. you've even got the video. how much proof do you need?
@2morowMan "All *educated* people know"? Hate to be the harbinger of bad news, but as much as I despise Bush, anyone that thinks the most incompetent administration in history was capable of pulling off the most elaborate conspiracy in the history of the planet after just eight months in office, must be viewing this from a padded cell in Sing-Sing.
@2morowMan I'm no fanatic, and I have no problem with people arguing that the Bush Administration "knew" and let it happen anyway to use for political gain, but arguing the Bushies were actually BEHIND the attacks is another matter entirely that requires an entirely new level of facts for which there is no rational argument. Most of the arguments I hear are full of holes, short on facts, based on wild misinformation and often just demonstrate the theorists own lack of knowledge.
@BI30 Obviously you haven't researched the topic as much as I. There is plenty of evidence - you can even start here on YouTube. I started from an Engineering point of view and was shocked at the official lies ... which lead me to learn more.
@BI30 The twin towers were ‘white elephants’ needing millions of dollars worth of work to keep open, yet Silverstein (Bush’s best buddy) bought and insured them just months prior to the mysterious work that occurred on the same floors we saw explosions coming from...
And just because you think he was incompetent at things that concern you, doesn’t mean he’s not a conniving b*#tard making himself and his buddies superrich.
@2morowMan You see here, your "white elephants" argument is a *theory*, not a "fact" proving the Bushies destroyed it. You previously asked about the "lost footage of the Pentagon crash?" Again, not proof the Bushies were actually BEHIND the attacks. Covering up their "incompetence" is a far more rational answer. As for the PA crash, debris fields are left behind by planes trying to AVOID crashing, striking at low speed. Planes disintegrate when slammed into solid surfaces at 600mph.
@BI30 there is no 'theory' about what a loss Silverstein would have taken on the towers. The pentagon crash - there's no 'lost' footage, they confiscated it all. Just go and check. And as for total disintegration - thats just sci-fy.
@2morowMan That's not what I meant. Whether or not Silverstein was loosing money is not evidence the Bushies destroyed it.
And the "lost footage", again, at most, it is evidence of a cover-up, not "proof" the Bushies were behind the attacks.
And just because you refuse to believe planes disintegrate when crashing at high speed doesn't make it "sci-fi". And again, lack of debris is not "proof" the Bushies were behind the attacks. Find the planes intact in a warehouse and we'll talk.
@Salamlakim1212 You DO realize that I have the power to not only delete your comments but ban you from posting to my videos entirely? I'd show a bit more respect.
Proof once again that cocaine use while being the owner of the Texas Rangers can lead to long term mental retardation and then you factor in 25 years of serious alcohol abuse and you have 8 years of a stuttering imbecile in the white house!
The planes that hit the towers had no passenger windows and no commercial markings. They could have been drones filled with explosives. 9/11 was an inside job, a controlled demolition with aircraft as decoys. They were false flag attacks and big money was and is involved.
@taariqtaariq 9/11 conspiracy theorists are idiots. The *original* claim was that it was the plane that hit THE PENTAGON that supposedly had no windows or markings... based upon grainy video footage taken by a low-speed parking lot camera as the plane flashed by at 600mph. You've turned that into "hit the towers" when (at the very least) the second plane was filmed from a dozen different angles clearly showing windows and markings. Easily debunked with a simple Google image search.
@BI30 I am a not a nutter but many things don't add up.The many threads leading up the 9/11 events are tangled and suspicious. I don't think anyone can trust the USA Govt and USA big business , which are nearly one and the same , as far as you could kick them, for any matter of public probity, altruism and honesty.I am not the only one to be 'iffy' about the US Govt , the CIA,Wall Street CEO s , the arms and oil industries,Mossad etc. etc
@taariqtaariq There are two kinds of 9/11 Conspiracists: those who think the government looked the other way and allowed the tragedy to take place so they could use it for political gain, and the "nutters" that believe 9/11 was a giant conspiracy, that the government actually staged 9/11 and no planes actually caused the destruction on that day.
@BI30 I think It might be a bit of Both. I know Rumsfeld and Cheney made the devil look like Mother Teresa in comparison and I couldn't put anything past them as being beyond the pale for them. They were sick and dangerous units.
It was unfortunate that day, I watched your video. When the first plane hit nobody knew what was going on. NOBODY!!.. and i think alot of people thought it was a terrible accident, didnt you?.,... then when the second hit, We had a general idea that this was on purpose, but still did'nt know what was going on. What would you have done if you were president??...plus you have no idea what was whispered in his ear. For all you know she whispered " We have a serious problem" and thats it.
@mrian720 Actually, we DO know what was whispered in Bush's ear because BUSH TOLD US. According to Bush, Card said, "We're under attack". According to Card in an interview that same week, he said "I had to say something in as few words as possible to convey the urgency of the situation, so I said, 'The second tower has been hit. We're at war"."
How would *I* of reacted? I would of calmly stood up, excused myself as having "President things to do", and find out what the f@#% was going on.
@BI30 Well first of all Bush was right in what he did, The man didn't want to upset the children, Secondly he was in Florida so there wasn't much he could do but be safe, Third he was thinking of what to say and do.
7 minutes is pretty quick for a decision on such things, to declare war that quickly I commend him. and to stay so calm in the class room, shows how much control he had, because if it were me I would have been cussing and telling mf'ers to get nukes ready.
@MysteryDru I guess you missed the BIG RED BOX on the video that told you to watch my response before replying. And if you think "seven minutes is a quick response" in an emergency, I pray no one in your family ever depends upon you to call 911.
@BI30 I saw you stupid propaganda. And I TOTALLY believe that seven minutes is a quick response to DECLARE WAR! READ my statements before replying. And calling 911 is a mistake. The police have their own objective and 9 out of 10 times you may end up with a ticket or in jail yourself. The last thing I do is call 911, I grab my gun first, then decide if cops need to be warned they might need to come carry someone out of my house, or whatnot.
@MysteryDru I don't think you watched the Reply video to the end if you claim "Bush didn't want to frighten the children". And I'm not sure what "propaganda" you think I'm pushing by showing clips of Republicans praising Rudy Guiliani's response to the attacks.
But most importantly, the President does not have the power to "declare war", Congress does. Nor did President Bush order ANY kind of military response in minute 8.
GTK on you grabbing a gun before calling the fire department.
@MysteryDru AND LASTLY! go find the recent interview of the students who were in that classroom ,that day of September 11, 2001, when President Bush when he had the strength, steadiness(which you spelled wrong) and leadership. They ALL say he did what was right and didn't leave but stayed in the classroom to contemplate the situation and not disrespect the students which he was there for them in the first place, AND I firmly believe he would have stayed longer if 9-11 never happened. GET OWNED!
@MysteryDru (Thanks for the spelling correction. It has been fixed.) Not sure how much weight to get a group of third-graders as to the wisdom of a President doing nothing in an emergency, but clearly you think children are the wisest source on how a president should react after being told the country he just swore an oath to defend not 8 months early was "under attack".
And you believe "if there had been no emergency, he would of stayed longer"? No kidding. Don't think that "Owns" me.
Buck Fush
Imagine1350 1 month ago
OMG!!!....HOW CAN HE JUST SITS THERE WHILE WE ARE UNDER ATTACK AND PEOPLE ARE DYING???
unhappyangel1126 1 month ago
Couldn't get more conclusive than this
revmortcompared 1 month ago
@revmortcompared It can get a LOT more conclusive than this. See watch?v=j5FhQc-LJ-o .
jhodgski 1 month ago
9/11 WAS AN OUTSIDE JOB!
ctcole77 3 months ago
Thank God he came aound to give the shoot down order some thirty-forty minutes later when on Air Force One right. It's just despicable how anyone can buy this as stupidity on his behalf. It's stalling by acting stupid.
HurburBurbur 3 months ago
@HurburBurbur No, Cheney has already admitted it was HE, not Bush, who finally gave the shoot down order (supposedly) after the fourth plane had already crashed in Shanksville.
Bush apologists still astound me.
BI30 3 months ago
@BI30
I should perhaps been a little bit clearer. The first actual defense decision of Bush was to at Air force One after a discussion with Cheney issue an order of shoot down of any nonresponding jetliner. You have the story told in documentaries such as the "9/11: Day That Changed The World" and "George W. Bush The 9/11 Interview" both of 2011. The point was merely to illustrate the passiveness, stalking, of W. Who really ran the show that day was of course Cheney, the mastermind of 9/11.
HurburBurbur 3 months ago
Bill Maher can kiss off. The president handled it fine. He had people underneath him taking care of the first few moments. We have military too who were watching the shores of this country.
stsr23 5 months ago
@stsr23 You are right. I've never heard a better argument for just how worthless and unnecessary President Bush was.
BI30 5 months ago
i am not a bush apoligist, nor a hater, but he better regret what he didin't do at that moment(i know if i would have done that i would have, bitterly). I know it was shocking and one doesnt know what to do, but he's the president. He should've interrupted it calmly, and tell them he was leaving due to an emergency. There is nothing wrong with telling the children what is going on, Im sure many teachers around the US even showed their students the events.
All I could think is "just save them!!"
stargirlsusan 5 months ago
Had he done something, he still would've been criticized. Of he walked out calmly, they would've criticized him for walking out in the middle of the children's lesson. If he would've ran out, he'd be criticized for scaring the kids. Same with any president, dem or republican, he handled it the way he wanted to handle it, in a lose lose lose situation in regards to criticism. He handled it nonetheless, so i can care less. What would Obama would've done? Sat there making a damn speech again?
Katapax 5 months ago
@Katapax Sorry, but that's nonsense and I can prove it. No one criticized Rudy Giuliani for going down to Ground Zero and organizing emergency response efforts. Just the opposite, people on both sides praised him.
Attacking someone no matter what they do... that's a hallmark of the Right, not the Left. Hell, Obama wasn't even in Washington yet and you already criticized him over some absurd reaction that you THINK he MIGHT have had.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 You are a typical Libtard B130. the dems have attacked people that don't even want to run for president like Rush Limbaugh. The dems attacked Bush for the country going broke when it was fannie may and freddy macs fault. The dems attacked Bush until he submitted to the stimulus package that didn't work and he told them it wouldn't. Just because the RIGHT states facts does not mean we are attacking you, don't get so offended when we say the truth.
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru Rush is a political pundit. He attacks Dems regularly. Do you believe the fact he's not a politician immunizes him from criticism? Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac are PRIVATE CORPORATIONS. They USED to be government run years ago, but Republicans cut them lose and deregulated them. Fannie/Freddie... which you just criticized... are perfect EXAMPLES of the failure of Conservative economics. Bush never passed a Stimulus. He passed a "tax rebate" and the Bank Bailout. So much for your facts.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 It was a tax rebate he passed so the dems would shut up about the stimulus package which they in turn pushed through anyways. Fannie/Freddie both gave out too many loans to people who could not pay the bills which crashed the housing market. They were gov't run until bush turned them loose. Private corps are better than anything the gov't has ever run. example SOCIAL SECURITY, fannie/freddie, public schools, etc.. Conservative economics trashes any liberal thoughts.
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru I really don't even need to reply to your latest bit of nonsense since every "fact" you listed was pulled straight from your hindquarters, easily debunked with a 5 second Google search. Bush's "tax rebates" took place before Dems retook Congress in '07. You might want to tell Bear/Stearns that it was all Fannie's fault. SocSec hasn't missed a check in 70 years and is running a SURPLUS. Though, if you're a product of public schools in the last 20 years, you may have a point there.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 Social security is a joke. You pay soo much into it your whole life and receive back a miniscule amount of money. It is just a way for the government to redistribute wealth in a sense. It should be privatized. and Why is it that fanny/freddie is now 80% owned by american taxpayers and we are dumbing up to 160billion$ to an estimated 1trillion into their bailout? Yes his tax rebates were before congress in '07 but I am talking about Feb 8 08 stimulus package to shutup Pelosi!
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru I would have stopped responding days ago, but as you become more & more unhinged, you start pulling stuff out of your butt that are just too stupid to let pass.
The biggest criticism the GOP has of SocSec is that it is "going bankrupt" because it "pays out FAR MORE than it takes in." That's why they want to raise the retirement age. But YOU are trying to argue SocSec pays out "too LITTLE". And your "solution" is to hand it over to the same people we just had to bailout for $750B???
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 why raise the retirement age over and over again if it is not in debt? and It does pay out too little to the retired! Privatize it! and we wouldn't be letting Fanny/freddy run it,rather people like Donald trump! who knows how to make money with money! It could be a trust fund of sorts that you pay into but don't use until you retire or are injured or lose your job!Why does my money need to go to a gov't office for them to give it partially back IF I retire?SocSec is idiocracy at its finest
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru "Over and over again"? I want what you're smoking. The retirement age has NEVER been raised. Fannie/Freddie don't run SocSec, but you clearly WANT them to after the wonderful job they did cratering Wall Street. THAT'S the people you've be handing SocSec over to by privatizing it. Trump has filed bankruptcy five times. Meanwhile, your SocSec taxes are invested in Treasury Bonds... the safest investment on the planet.
We are REALLY getting off the subject now.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 I AM TALKING FULL RETIREMENT BENEFITS! I can only receive it in full at age 67.My grandpa got his at 65.that is raising age for full benefits.it is even on the ssa website! and I dont want fanny/freddy running socsec I want business men like trump and wynn who KNOW HOW TO MAKE MONEY BY USING MONEY! I want all my money back that I put into SS, not a partial ammount! making private and running it like a trust fund(of sorts) would benefit Americans more! and there wouldnt be gov't involved
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru The later you retire, the larger your checks will be, but that's not new. You can retire as early as 62 if you accept a considerable cut in your monthly benefit. The age at which you can apply for benefits hasn't changed in the 76 year history of the program. If you don't like having to wait until 67 for "maximum" benefits, thank a Republican. And again, I remind you that Trump has gone bankrupt five times, and both Trump & Wynn make their money running casinos.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 Right, a cut in my benefits, meaning "Don't retire too early, or we will keep more of your money!" and Trump has not gone Bankrupt 5 times, his companies have and he just readjusted his debt and is paying it off himself or with his other companies. and Wynn/Trump do own casinos and Resorts, but that is not the only business they deal with! It is blatant that these two know how to make and manage money, thats why they are rich, so yes I still would want them(or ppl alike) to run SocSec!
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru You would simply receive a smaller check each month, but you could (and many do) eventually receive more money in return they you paid in Think of 67 as saving for two extra years, then adding that savings to each check. The government (unlike privatization) isn't "profiting" off your investment.
And claiming the companies Trump ran went bankrupt but not Trump himself is just stupid. Trump was born rich. Wynn's dad ran a chain of bingo parlors. Is that where to invest your SocSec?
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 You're taking what I am saying out of context. They know how to make money by using money. So what if Trumps companies had bankrupted? He still managed to make more money while fixing his debt. I want people like Wynn/trump who know how to invest/manage money properly to run a privatized SocSec. How do you know that the gov't doesn't benefit from our money being in SS? You should really read what Michael Tanner said about it and what will happen here very soon!
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru This is so far off the subject, I think we can end this here. No one is about to entrust the $2T SocSec trust fund to a guy that has a track record of bankruptcy. Trump was able to "comeback" because banks and private investors were willing to mortgage his personal assets to fund his comeback. Trump can't cover $2T in loses. As for "how do I know the gov isn't "profiting" off the SS money? Because I'm not an idiot and know what a T-Bill is.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 OMFG! can you not read?! obviously not. I said people LIKE! trump/wynn, PEOPLE WHO KNOW how to manage /invest/make money. and if you think for one second that the gov't is not using the income of people paying into SocSec then you are completely ignorant. T-bills are a way for other countries to invest in our nations debt, which in my eye is them taking control of our country to a point. China is the top holder of U.S. Treauries. we just need to privatize SocSec, that's it.
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru OMFG? Really? After defending Trump, you're surprised I pointed out why he.(and people like him) aren't the amazing money mangers you believe them to be? Can you name ANYONE suited to manage a $2 TRILLION dollar program that doesn't run a casino or needed to be bailed out by the FedGov? And just because you THINK SocSec is cashing in Treasury bonds (where? On the black market? And doing WHAT with them exactly?) doesn't make it so. This conversation is over. Reply & you'll be banned.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 I can name several people. And seeing how you are threatening on banning me goes to show that I am right and you are wrong. 3 working people pay for one retired person, when SocSec started it was over 100 ppl, and soon enough it will be 2-1. Plus the people who die before receiving their "benefits" from socsec where do you think that money goes? to the gov't, they may give some to the families but not all of it. Privatize SocSec and watch it create jobs as well as wealth.
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru "I can name several people". And yet, in your final post, you don't name a single one. Call me skeptical. The fact you think my bringing this idiotic conversation with a 22 year old child to a close "proves you're right" despite allowing you to blather on for two weeks, only further calls your maturity into question. Where does that SocSec money go? I think we already established that: T-bills. It collects interest until you need it. What a way to waste your last post. Buh bye.
BI30 5 months ago
@MysteryDru "I can name several people". And yet, in your final post, you don't name a single one. Call me skeptical. The fact you think my bringing this idiotic conversation with a 22 year old child to a close "proves you're right" despite allowing you to blather on for two weeks, only further calls your maturity into question. Where does that SocSec money go? I think we already established that: T-bills. It collects interest until you need it. What a way to waste your last post. Buh bye.
BI30 5 months ago
@MysteryDru Oh, and as for why Fanny is now "80% owned by the government"... see my previous comment about the "bailout" of Wall Street.
On the Feb '08 "Stimulus"... you mean those $150B in TAX BREAKS Bush agreed to? If you're arguing it wasn't a Stimulus, we've finally found a point of agreement. CORPORATE TAX CUTS ARE NOT STIMULATIVE.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 TO A POINT! corporate tax cuts do work but will never be as effective as cutting the fed income tax. Corp cuts allow the companies to hire more and research and develop new products faster which in turn stimulates business, prototypes need parts produced by other companies and so on.how are you going to say he never passed a stimulus when I just told you he did in 2-8-08?he did the bank bailout because of fanny/freddy debacle and gave tax cuts while fighting 2 wars.
MysteryDru 5 months ago
@MysteryDru I actually agree w/you (to a point) that middle class tax cuts (fed income tax) are more stimulative than corp tax cuts, but the fact is, not only does cutting *corporate* taxes not help, they actually HURT the economy and job growth. All you described, hiring, investing, etc, happen when they REINVEST to AVOID paying those taxes. They POCKET the savings when their taxes are cut. As for Feb'08 & Obama'09, YOU argued the Stimulus didn't work. Both were most all cuts. And here we are.
BI30 5 months ago
@Katapax I got your back dude
MysteryDru 5 months ago
Don't "Walk like an Egyptian", Shuffle like 5 Dancing Israelis on 9/11
Born2Flesh 5 months ago
you know i tend to agree that him sitting for 11 minutes after hearing of the second plane crash as bizzare, but dont fault him for continuing his "photo-op" initially when the first plane crashed, at the time nobody knew much , people assumed it was a small plane, the full extent of the tragedy hit people after the second plane, why did bush continue doing what he did, i dunno, maybe because he just didnt know what to do and was looking to his aides to tell him what to do who were clueless too
ashwinbhat123 5 months ago
Look wtf are you supposed to do what can you do
Pedofied 5 months ago
@Pedofied It appears you... like so many Bush apologists before you... didn't even watch the video before commenting, and missed the BIG RED BOX directing you to watch the Response before commenting.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 Your way to harsh on him and hell I'm not even a george bush fan hell I'm canadian I hate some of the moves he made during his presidency but this was not his worst
Pedofied 5 months ago
@Pedofied Did you read the thread from the beginning?
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 yes i did
Pedofied 5 months ago
@Pedofied Considering that The Commander in Chief, the highest ranking law enforcement official in the nation, and "leader of the free world" sat there like a moron with his thumb up his butt; I'm really hoping your comment was a joke.
medicineman1317 5 months ago
I am a huge George Bush fan!!!
fudgecracker193 5 months ago
@fudgecracker193 Well don't worry, I'm sure the meds will kick in soon.
BI30 5 months ago
@fudgecracker193 Well don't worry, I'm sure the meds will kick in soon.
BI30 5 months ago
@BI30 Shut it you idiot.
fudgecracker193 5 months ago
Bush was reading his pet goat book for satan
CollabGiants 5 months ago
Is it me or these people below me are writing essays
aragrox 5 months ago
@aragrox Yep. And fun reading too.
BI30 5 months ago
Bush is having a nice time HAHAH
ShovelHorse 5 months ago
i wouldnt give a FUCK if the kids were panicing, the towers are bouta fall and shit i wanna make a MOVE.
iwillavengeyou 5 months ago
The whole discussion about the US gouvernment being involved in 911 to create a faked reason for war is ridiculous. I guess that the US would not do this in the first place. And 911 was far too big and expensive. But just the right size if someone else wanted to draw the US into a costly war where they can make a lot of new enemies. And Al Qaida could not have done this without the help of a secret service outside the US. Check out my channel and homepage.
Martin Bott
wwwtotalitaerde 6 months ago
@wwwtotalitaerde Oh yeah you dont think our goverment wouldnt do this, then you know nothing. Search "operation northwoods" then tell me they wouldnt do this. God I hate stupid people
bobsizzz 5 months ago
@bobsizzz Operation Northwoods was DECLINED by President Kennedy.And it largely consisted of recommendations to FAKE incidents.Without causing real victims
So its just as I wrote.As a justification for a war you use fake incidents causing only minor damage. 911 caused about 3000 real deaths and inflicted major damage on the US economy
You just dont do things like 911 to get a reason for a war.Blowing up US embassies or the attack on USS Cole would have been far beyond what is necessary for war
wwwtotalitaerde 5 months ago
@wwwtotalitaerde Oh Jesus you are missing the point. The point is that they did plan doing that. And using supposedly high jacked aircraft doesnt that sound familiar? These people dont care who gets killed. I see there is no hope in you waking the fuck up. You clearly read what our goverment proposed to do. Now if they would have went with there plan you dont think thousands of innocent lives would have been lost? You are one dumb fuck. I am done even responding to your dumb ass
bobsizzz 5 months ago
@bobsizzz But one thing is strange. The possibility that the brainwashing and steering techniques described on my homepage and on my channel may have been used on 911, never was openly discussed.
wwwtotalitaerde 5 months ago
@wwwtotalitaerde Thanks for the info I will check out your homepage
bobsizzz 5 months ago
When this happened everyone I know got to a TV Bush just chillen with some kids, somthing is deffinitly wrong their.
UgLyKoerner 6 months ago
ok be smart about this....i dont think bush was a really good president but he was all the way in florida....what in the world could he have done and when the country is under attack...the job of the secret service is to keep the president safe....im just sayin what the hell did any of you do when it happened
BangaMuzikReel 6 months ago
@BangaMuzikReel The first thing *I* did when I heard the news? Got up and looked for a TV for more information.
BI30 6 months ago
@BangaMuzikReel He is the commander in cheif, he should be the first to respond and organize. Man are you stupid
bobsizzz 5 months ago
@BangaMuzikReel ok wat could he have said, it isnt like if he would have said something the "terrorist would have turned the second plane around.....wow a lot of people are still under the impression that the president has the last word in this country...in that situation no one could do anything except for the firefighters,policeman and the civilians that where there trying to save as many lives as they can...be realistic....wat cud have bush done to help at that moment in time ......nothing
BangaMuzikReel 5 months ago
You act like a bratty teenager, get over yourself.
zunedog31 6 months ago
whoever uploaded this video is an idiot.
zunedog31 6 months ago
@zunedog31 Based upon such an informative response, I can understand why you'd think that.
BI30 6 months ago
@BI30 The way you treat people in the comments is disappointing. You seem like a left-wing nut job to me and you show disrespect to a president that was not really that bad. Seeing as you responded to my comment in minutes you care a lot for this propaganda spreading video with little minuscule persuasive power.
zunedog31 6 months ago
@zunedog31 Are you REALLY going to criticize my treatment of people after calling me an "idiot"? I treat people the same way they treat me and other readers. Deal.
As for Bush, he was the most miserable president since Hoover. Economic disaster, turned a Surplus into a doubling of the debt, invaded another country with lies, dismissed OBL SIX MONTHS after 9//11, failed to end either war, gas hits $2/$3/$4 a gallon for the first time in history, turned U.S into nation that excuses torture......
BI30 6 months ago 2
@BI30 You seem mad, are you? Most of those points are invalid and half-truths. Left wing dick-rider... That last one made me chucke a little!
zunedog31 6 months ago
@zunedog31 So sad.
BI30 6 months ago
@zunedog31 As for my quick response time, my PC doubles as my TV. I'm notified instantly of any Comments. You're not special.
BI30 6 months ago
@BI30 HI FOX NEWS I'M ON THE TV WITH YOU!!
zunedog31 6 months ago
@BI30 (-little)
zunedog31 6 months ago
@ 2.25 "orio"
thats orio palmer , one of the first guys to reach the fire......and said two isolated pockets of fire that was easy enough to knock down
lonewolf2379 7 months ago
@lonewolf2379 inside job
yimnerr 6 months ago
the only thing id say is possibly bush didnt know the first plane was an actual terrorist attack when he was on his way to the school.....
lonewolf2379 7 months ago
@lonewolf2379 No one did. But this footage wasn't after the first hit. It was after the second.
BI30 7 months ago
@lonewolf2379 Yeah right, then when he heard about the second attack while in school he just sat there like a idiot. Please get some common sense
bobsizzz 5 months ago
@bobsizzz
look mate..i used to be a believer of an inside job but ive woken up and realised it was an attack on america by muslims extremists......
it looks like bush just didnt know to fuckin do.......and he had already seen plane one hit the first tower on a tv set AFTER it crashed.
lonewolf2379 5 months ago
@lonewolf2379 You didn't wake up at all you fell back asleep. This goes much deeper than this but since you cant even figure out the obvious I will not even attempt to show you how deep this goes. Good day to you and I hope you wake back up
bobsizzz 5 months ago
in my opinion i kinda think did bush did the right thing by not freaking out in front of the kids..however..i think 7mins way too long to just sit there
EHS1234356 7 months ago
@EHS1234356 Do you REALLY believe "freaking out" was his ONLY other option?
BI30 7 months ago
@EHS1234356 You are an idiot. When your country is supposedly under attack and you are the commander in chief you jump up and do your fucking job. You try and prevent thousands of other possable deaths instead of worrying about what a class of kids think. You do not owe the kids an explanation why you got up and left the classroom. You just quietly get up and leave. The secret service could tell the teacher the president has important bussinesss to attend to and tell her nothing more period.
bobsizzz 5 months ago
This might seem UNBELIEVABLE but....the towers were made to sustain an impact like this.
Rest in Peace, all those who have died, brave firefighters, and innocent civilians.
And thanks to all the firefighters who helped.
iwillavengeyou 7 months ago
@iwillavengeyou No its not unbelivable what you say is the truth. Also Jet fuel burns around 600 F and steel doesnt begin to weaken till around 1100 F. This was totaly an inside job, it is clear as day with anyone that has half a brain cell. Just google "operation northwoods" you will see a smimular situation that our goverment admits to.
bobsizzz 5 months ago
@bobsizzz wow, just read op. northwoods on wiki. domestic terrorism from our own gov. to start a war w/ cuba. this could be the same thing in the future just to get in the middleast for some oil. wow some things are crazy....
iwillavengeyou 5 months ago
@iwillavengeyou I am glad that opend your eyes a bit. That same tactic was used on 911. Wasn't operation northwoods eerily simular to 911? The US has used false flag operations for every war we have been in. The CIA under Clinton when he was govener of Arkansas was running military weapons to the Nicaraguan contras out of Mena Akansas airport using Military C-123 cargo planes. They sold the weapons to the contras then flew to Columbia and loaded the plane full of cocaine and flew back to Mena.
bobsizzz 5 months ago
@bobsizzz damn this government is so corrupt
iwillavengeyou 5 months ago
@iwillavengeyou You have no idea how deep this rabbit hole goes my friend. God Bless you
bobsizzz 5 months ago
@bobsizzz you too man, you too
iwillavengeyou 5 months ago
Comment removed
iwillavengeyou 7 months ago
Bill Maher? Yeah He is a great source of insight and knowledge on how to be in the most difficult position of leadership at the most difficult time. The POTUS does not personally sit in front of a radar screen watching for inbound ICBMs, there are thousands of military personell doing that.
MrDominicbrandon 7 months ago
@MrDominicbrandon So you're saying that sitting there until someone tells him that "missiles are on their way" was the best use of his time at that moment?
BI30 7 months ago
i jdon't get it....what does legend519 mean by this video being 'biased'?
is that someone who just looks like bush sitting there with a blank face?
and the message whispered in his ear was that....' he was doing great with those kids, and he should keep on doing it because everything was hunky-dory in our nation?'
bina1rani 7 months ago
this video is biased....people, make up your own opinions, don't beleive everything you watch on the internet...
and no, I'm not a bush advocate
legend519 7 months ago
@legend519 If you clicked on this video expecting a "news" report, you're not too bright. OF COURSE "this video is biased". I think The Commander-in-Chief sitting motionless in a classroom after being told the country was "under attack" is deserving of criticism. Don't you?
BI30 7 months ago
Really Bush didnt have much of a choice. now if He knew it was to happen prior to His trip to Florida, we will never know.
tazz20041985 8 months ago
i just love how everyone can put them selves in bush's shoes and say "i would have excused myself and left calmly". yeah fucking right. hearing "uh... were at war", out in a public place were your life may now be in danger, i bet you wouldent have frozen up and shit your pants eather. no one is ready to hear that news.
TheLateKnight4785 8 months ago
@TheLateKnight4785 Perhaps you should watch the "Video Reply" as instructed at the very start of the video before commenting next time.
BI30 8 months ago
@BI30 i did. im not a "bush apologist". but ive also never been the president and heard "hey. were at war. and theres at least one person in the world right now who wants you dead enough to actually kill you." so i cant say how i would react. but thanks for your snarky ass reply to my comment instead of trying to see things from another angle.
TheLateKnight4785 8 months ago
@TheLateKnight4785 My "snarky ass reply" is in response to four years of apologists trying to defend Bush for his (lack of a) reaction that morning. If THAT is how he reacts in an emergency, maybe he shouldn't have signed up to be "Commander-in-Chief" of the most powerful nation on Earth? I'm not fan of Rudy, but isn't it funny how HE didn't sit motionless and paralyzed with fear when HE heard the news. And that morning, MY first reaction was to look for a TV to get more information.
BI30 8 months ago
@BI30 your first reaction was to look for a tv to get more info. rudy didn't sit paralyzed with fear and lept into action. neither one of you was in a school full of people you've never seen before wondering if a sniper didn't have his bead directly on your forehead. im not trying to make excuses for the downie. but dammit theres other ways to look at things i see your point. what im wondering is why you cant see the other points.
TheLateKnight4785 8 months ago
@TheLateKnight4785 The difference is Bush was the COMMANDER IN CHIEF of a country he was just told was "under attack", and your defense is that a man surrounded by the most elite security force known to man didn't react because he might of been concerned for his personal safety? If you're STILL wondering why I am unable to "see things from HIS perspective", then you don't get it and never will. There is NO justification for his inaction that morning.
BI30 8 months ago
@BI30 i guse not. i only hope some day your the most powerful person in the country and something like this happens again so we can see what you actually do. ill be at home going "oh well. it happened. nothing we can do now except wait and see what were gonna do now." just like i did with this.
TheLateKnight4785 8 months ago
@TheLateKnight4785 While you're at home hoping for another 9/11 just see how I'd react as Commander-in-Chief, I'll stay here thanking God it won't be you.
BI30 8 months ago
NINE11 was a sacrificial ritual and the idol of worship was the queen of heaven(statue of liberty).Pay close attention to bush,the teacher and children synchronizing witchcraft and saying the words KITE(controlled plane)PLANE,HIT,STEEL,MUST.Then seconds later bush is notified of plane impact.The children bow while picking up their pet goat book.The pet goat is the baphomet(satan).The witch lady begins a beat and Mr.Bush sits there while people are jumping to their deaths.What evil did they see?
8bebe8 8 months ago
@8bebe8 you're an idiot. you have no idea how magicks work. learn2pagan christfag. i did not know kite ment controlled plane. you your saying the spell goes "controlled plane plane hit steel must'. kinda hard not to bow wile picking up something. the book had nothing to do with goats retard. watch yourself next time you read (implying you actualy read) and i bet you catch yourself tapping something.
TheLateKnight4785 8 months ago
@TheLateKnight4785 we can go back and forth talking shit but i would rather not so do what you do best biatch ridicule people all you want say disrespectfull words tough guy.SOME YOUTUBERS ARE PATHETIC............what are the fucking odds of the kids saying thoes key words watch the tape not the edited ones you goof like FARENHEIGHT 911
8bebe8 8 months ago
@8bebe8 no. just a pissed off druid wondering why all Christians think there experts on things that existed long before there "religion" did. it takes months of preparation to pull off any spell. not just some tapping and "key words". oh and doing magicks like this in a public place, let alone wile on camera, normally causes the one preforming it to come accost misfortune. do a bit of research before you open your mouth next time... goof....
TheLateKnight4785 8 months ago
@TheLateKnight4785 goof...im not even christian you retard, but soon to be. I certainly wouldnt want to be a pagan devil worshipper like you goof. Have a nice day promote love.
8bebe8 8 months ago
@8bebe8 Wow it is nice to see someone that sees the real truth. You are spot on. Also if you look at the picture with the girl standing between the two stars they are upside down and also Bush is holding the book upside down. If you look at George washingtons statue of him sitting it is the same pose as the baphoment. 99% of the people cannot belive our goverment orchastrated this let alone this goes way deeper than that like you said a sacrificial ritual. God Bless you
bobsizzz 5 months ago
@bobsizzz god bless you aswell
8bebe8 5 months ago
All he had to do was announce: Excuse Me. Then proceed out into the hall and into the limo for further briefing then one of his assistants could have sat in for him and quietly told the teacher that there was a national emergency and the President had to leave immediately and I think she would have understood. He looks like he was going into shock and was trying to control his reaction to the news.
goldengirl67 9 months ago
It clearly states in the paper, published in 2000, called "Rebuilding America's Defenses" by the Project for the New American Century, that the only way to get an increased military budget and the political and public consensus needed to invade Iraq was by " some catastrophic and catalyzing event––like a new Pearl Harbour" One year later the very "event" took place. On the back of it, the pentagon was given a blank cheque and a license to invade Iraq and Afghanistan. No coincidence!
BrainiacFingers 9 months ago
You people need to get a life. What could he have done? Darted in front of the next plane? He was probably told a plane struck the first tower, not that it was terrorists. At that point it wasnt clear that it even was terrorists.
gatorbait000 9 months ago
watch the interview with the kids that were in the classroom with him. Fucking idiot.
spokendeity 9 months ago
Can you imagine how the children would have felt if he had just leaped up and dashed out? I never heard of Bush hearing about the first plane in the limo. I always thought he was told by the secret service.
I'm sorry. I never liked Bush. I just don't believe in all the conspiracies. Not that I blithely believe everything I've been told; but no human being would have just ignored that kind of thing. And while Bush was an idiot, he was a human being with a job he knew needed to be done.
2thatonegirl16 9 months ago 2
@2thatonegirl16 Ihave to wonder about anyone that thinks Bush's ONLY alternative was to "leap up and rush out of the room" as opposed to simply excusing himself as having "President things" to do.
BI30 9 months ago
@BI30 Haha well, maybe / would have jumped up and dashed out... xD
2thatonegirl16 9 months ago
What a crock of shit, fucking people and their fucked up opinions.
briank383 9 months ago
The National Institute of Standards and Technology and civil engineers all accept the fact that a jet impact at high speeds along with the fires it caused led to the collapse of the WTC, not demolition. So unless any of you conspiracy theory enthusiasts are engineers, I'm gonna trust them, and my major, civil engineering.
koryturner07 9 months ago
how is something that takes weeks of prep and arrangement, suppose to possibly get done in a matter of minutes?? the only way that was done if they already had the bombs in place. which also means they KNEW this would happen. People inside the WTC buildings, the ones who actually got out and survived, they said they heard bombs go off. the plane, that hit the building, the 'plane', was said to have sounded like a missle. And you ask how this could have been done without anyone seein
sshers1 10 months ago
@sshers1 Dude wake up from your ignorance. 9/11 was not planned. Those "bomb sounds" was just the plane engine exploding. And that plane was not a freaking missile. They found plane parts and there is evidence of the plane's take off from an airport. Also, try consulting the Civil Engineers and scientists about this. You'll notice that they all say that it was a plane that crashed into the building.
Stop with your Alex Jones crap. Jones is an idiot who doesn't know what they heck he's saying.
sbalusu94 9 months ago
so what your saying is you like any other person with a brain can see that this was all known therefore who is responsible? anyway man im done because not everyone was meant to have there eyes open to truth, the bad guys are gonna need an army too
Salamlakim1212 10 months ago
@Salamlakim1212 As I said earlier, this is my video and have no reason sit back while you attack me because what I tell you doesn't fit in with your questionable reality. You have been blocked.
BI30 10 months ago
the mines containing thermite blew at point of impact and disinergrated straight through steel like butter...wow (* (
Salamlakim1212 10 months ago
@Salamlakim1212 The claims of "traces of thermite" have two substantial flaws:
1) They did not find traces in the quantities that would be required to implode two buildings of that size.
2) Thanks to the chemical soup of materials found in that building, I'm surprised they didn't find traces of King Tut's Tomb.
And unless you're a nut that believes the planes were holograms, how would they of known EXACTLY where the planes would strike so as to know exactly where to plant the explosives?
BI30 10 months ago
@BI30 buddy you have the footage and still cant see....how does a alluminum plane slice through metal as was the result after it hit? wake up man the kids where reading, KITE, HIT,STEEL,PLANE,MUST, and reading the The Pet Goat, He knew, THEY knew, and then made it look like Bush is a product of our school system not teaching us how to respond to issues like an adult,so pretend to sit there like a freakin kid, suckin his thumb, reading a kids book, LMAO, ya cause Bush was raised just like me and
Salamlakim1212 10 months ago
@Salamlakim1212 I love it when people that don't understand the science behind something try to assert "facts". It's like when Bill O'Reilley suggested no one has yet to explain what causes the tides.
Have you ever seen a piece or straw driven through a palm tree by a tornado? You might remember from your High School physics class that Force = Mass * Acceleration. Then again, you may not.
BI30 10 months ago
@BI30 you rite???LMAO his dad was the president for christ sake and they own oil, this man has seen it All you hear me, he is a Master manipulater, a Master con artist, Master sociopath, PURE EVIL is his heart and soul, as is for the rest of those "heads" of the world, i pray for your sake when its war in the streets you know what side to take, and that goes for all americans because this country is headed to civil war inevitibley
Salamlakim1212 10 months ago
@Salamlakim1212 There is a difference between saying Bush "let" it happen and claiming Bush "made" it happen.
Not moving in the classroom is not "proof" he was behind it. AT MOST, it might suggest he "knew" it was coming and let it happen anyway. "Personal interpretations of observations" is not "proof". It's "speculation". For something to be "proof", it can't be used as evidence of a competing theory.
BI30 10 months ago
all educated people know Bush was behind 911. how anyone can refute the controlled demolition is beyond me. its as clear as day. you've even got the video. how much proof do you need?
2morowMan 10 months ago
@2morowMan "All *educated* people know"? Hate to be the harbinger of bad news, but as much as I despise Bush, anyone that thinks the most incompetent administration in history was capable of pulling off the most elaborate conspiracy in the history of the planet after just eight months in office, must be viewing this from a padded cell in Sing-Sing.
BI30 10 months ago
@BI30 I suspect arguing with you will be like arguing with a religious fanatic – just a waste of time.
Where’s all the film of the pentagon crash? Where’s all the wreckage?
How about that 4th plane that made a small dent in a field. Look at Lockerbie and other crashes – the devastation is enormous, not just a ‘camp-fire’.
2morowMan 10 months ago
@2morowMan I'm no fanatic, and I have no problem with people arguing that the Bush Administration "knew" and let it happen anyway to use for political gain, but arguing the Bushies were actually BEHIND the attacks is another matter entirely that requires an entirely new level of facts for which there is no rational argument. Most of the arguments I hear are full of holes, short on facts, based on wild misinformation and often just demonstrate the theorists own lack of knowledge.
BI30 10 months ago
@BI30 Obviously you haven't researched the topic as much as I. There is plenty of evidence - you can even start here on YouTube. I started from an Engineering point of view and was shocked at the official lies ... which lead me to learn more.
2morowMan 10 months ago
@BI30 The twin towers were ‘white elephants’ needing millions of dollars worth of work to keep open, yet Silverstein (Bush’s best buddy) bought and insured them just months prior to the mysterious work that occurred on the same floors we saw explosions coming from...
And just because you think he was incompetent at things that concern you, doesn’t mean he’s not a conniving b*#tard making himself and his buddies superrich.
2morowMan 10 months ago
@2morowMan You see here, your "white elephants" argument is a *theory*, not a "fact" proving the Bushies destroyed it. You previously asked about the "lost footage of the Pentagon crash?" Again, not proof the Bushies were actually BEHIND the attacks. Covering up their "incompetence" is a far more rational answer. As for the PA crash, debris fields are left behind by planes trying to AVOID crashing, striking at low speed. Planes disintegrate when slammed into solid surfaces at 600mph.
BI30 10 months ago
@BI30 there is no 'theory' about what a loss Silverstein would have taken on the towers. The pentagon crash - there's no 'lost' footage, they confiscated it all. Just go and check. And as for total disintegration - thats just sci-fy.
2morowMan 10 months ago
@2morowMan That's not what I meant. Whether or not Silverstein was loosing money is not evidence the Bushies destroyed it.
And the "lost footage", again, at most, it is evidence of a cover-up, not "proof" the Bushies were behind the attacks.
And just because you refuse to believe planes disintegrate when crashing at high speed doesn't make it "sci-fi". And again, lack of debris is not "proof" the Bushies were behind the attacks. Find the planes intact in a warehouse and we'll talk.
BI30 10 months ago
@BI30 buddy go check yourself in then cause you a joke....what a waste
Salamlakim1212 10 months ago
@Salamlakim1212 You DO realize that I have the power to not only delete your comments but ban you from posting to my videos entirely? I'd show a bit more respect.
BI30 10 months ago
Proof once again that cocaine use while being the owner of the Texas Rangers can lead to long term mental retardation and then you factor in 25 years of serious alcohol abuse and you have 8 years of a stuttering imbecile in the white house!
clintonplaza 10 months ago
The world is so full ignorants and idiots.. just read the comments of inside job. only idiots can believe that -- dont waste time arguing with IDIOTS
221ofc 11 months ago
The planes that hit the towers had no passenger windows and no commercial markings. They could have been drones filled with explosives. 9/11 was an inside job, a controlled demolition with aircraft as decoys. They were false flag attacks and big money was and is involved.
taariqtaariq 11 months ago
@taariqtaariq 9/11 conspiracy theorists are idiots. The *original* claim was that it was the plane that hit THE PENTAGON that supposedly had no windows or markings... based upon grainy video footage taken by a low-speed parking lot camera as the plane flashed by at 600mph. You've turned that into "hit the towers" when (at the very least) the second plane was filmed from a dozen different angles clearly showing windows and markings. Easily debunked with a simple Google image search.
BI30 11 months ago
@BI30 I am a not a nutter but many things don't add up.The many threads leading up the 9/11 events are tangled and suspicious. I don't think anyone can trust the USA Govt and USA big business , which are nearly one and the same , as far as you could kick them, for any matter of public probity, altruism and honesty.I am not the only one to be 'iffy' about the US Govt , the CIA,Wall Street CEO s , the arms and oil industries,Mossad etc. etc
taariqtaariq 11 months ago
@taariqtaariq There are two kinds of 9/11 Conspiracists: those who think the government looked the other way and allowed the tragedy to take place so they could use it for political gain, and the "nutters" that believe 9/11 was a giant conspiracy, that the government actually staged 9/11 and no planes actually caused the destruction on that day.
I have no tolerance for Group #2.
BI30 11 months ago
@BI30 I think It might be a bit of Both. I know Rumsfeld and Cheney made the devil look like Mother Teresa in comparison and I couldn't put anything past them as being beyond the pale for them. They were sick and dangerous units.
taariqtaariq 11 months ago
Bush is war criminal
zip68 1 year ago
@zip68 hey man so is Castro, Hassain, Ghadafy , Almadinajah and you not doing anything about it you hypocrite--so just shut the fuck up idiot
221ofc 11 months ago
@221ofc yeah but this guy had such master plan, tha war machine was running stronger than ever.
zip68 11 months ago
maybe all of them.
each one has a function, sometimes your function is to say nothing about something very severe.
oscarreggiotube 1 year ago
It was unfortunate that day, I watched your video. When the first plane hit nobody knew what was going on. NOBODY!!.. and i think alot of people thought it was a terrible accident, didnt you?.,... then when the second hit, We had a general idea that this was on purpose, but still did'nt know what was going on. What would you have done if you were president??...plus you have no idea what was whispered in his ear. For all you know she whispered " We have a serious problem" and thats it.
mrian720 1 year ago
@mrian720 Actually, we DO know what was whispered in Bush's ear because BUSH TOLD US. According to Bush, Card said, "We're under attack". According to Card in an interview that same week, he said "I had to say something in as few words as possible to convey the urgency of the situation, so I said, 'The second tower has been hit. We're at war"."
How would *I* of reacted? I would of calmly stood up, excused myself as having "President things to do", and find out what the f@#% was going on.
BI30 1 year ago 11
@BI30 i agree
Glen2906 9 months ago
@BI30 Well first of all Bush was right in what he did, The man didn't want to upset the children, Secondly he was in Florida so there wasn't much he could do but be safe, Third he was thinking of what to say and do.
7 minutes is pretty quick for a decision on such things, to declare war that quickly I commend him. and to stay so calm in the class room, shows how much control he had, because if it were me I would have been cussing and telling mf'ers to get nukes ready.
MysteryDru 6 months ago
@MysteryDru I guess you missed the BIG RED BOX on the video that told you to watch my response before replying. And if you think "seven minutes is a quick response" in an emergency, I pray no one in your family ever depends upon you to call 911.
BI30 6 months ago
@BI30 I saw you stupid propaganda. And I TOTALLY believe that seven minutes is a quick response to DECLARE WAR! READ my statements before replying. And calling 911 is a mistake. The police have their own objective and 9 out of 10 times you may end up with a ticket or in jail yourself. The last thing I do is call 911, I grab my gun first, then decide if cops need to be warned they might need to come carry someone out of my house, or whatnot.
MysteryDru 6 months ago
@MysteryDru I don't think you watched the Reply video to the end if you claim "Bush didn't want to frighten the children". And I'm not sure what "propaganda" you think I'm pushing by showing clips of Republicans praising Rudy Guiliani's response to the attacks.
But most importantly, the President does not have the power to "declare war", Congress does. Nor did President Bush order ANY kind of military response in minute 8.
GTK on you grabbing a gun before calling the fire department.
BI30 6 months ago
@MysteryDru AND LASTLY! go find the recent interview of the students who were in that classroom ,that day of September 11, 2001, when President Bush when he had the strength, steadiness(which you spelled wrong) and leadership. They ALL say he did what was right and didn't leave but stayed in the classroom to contemplate the situation and not disrespect the students which he was there for them in the first place, AND I firmly believe he would have stayed longer if 9-11 never happened. GET OWNED!
MysteryDru 6 months ago
@MysteryDru (Thanks for the spelling correction. It has been fixed.) Not sure how much weight to get a group of third-graders as to the wisdom of a President doing nothing in an emergency, but clearly you think children are the wisest source on how a president should react after being told the country he just swore an oath to defend not 8 months early was "under attack".
And you believe "if there had been no emergency, he would of stayed longer"? No kidding. Don't think that "Owns" me.
BI30 6 months ago