Too bad the quality is lacking in this vid but the argument she presents is the "Original" intent of 2nd amendment. Good Job she did on this presentation where can I find the full version?
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state..." I think we should obey the second amendment. If people really feel like they need to rise up and defend their state from the oppression of the federal government and/or that of another state or country, they should do so in a well-regulated militia. Because that's what the American Revolution was all about. It's everyone's right to do so. That's what people against gun control argue right? Oh, wait...
Very articulate comment; unfortunately it's off the mark. The "well regulated milita" line is perhaps the most misunderstood and misapplied phrase in the Constitution. It appears only because the Founders argued over the philosophy of keeping a standing federal army vs state militias. They ultimately decided that a standing army would be a threat to the security of a free state and thus the concept of well regulated state militias should be supported.
I ran out of room to type. The right to bear arms is an individual right and does not relate to membership in a militia or army. The reference to "well regulated militia" refers to the outcome of the debate over state militias vs a standing federal army. Go back and read some of the writings of the Founders and you'll see that their intent was to clearly protect the right of the individual to bear arms.
you yanks are living in cowboy land. surely you gotta realise that guns kill people. if someone in america has a bad day they just get a gun and go blast people to death. guns are too easy to get hold of...
Guns don't kill people. People kill people. We don't outlaw cars because some people drive drunk. The Founders realized that in order to retain and defend their liberty, a free people must be prepared to defend themselves from government tyranny.
Guns will always, always be available. It's important that they be available to the right people. If it weren't for guns, they'd be playing "God Save the Queen" at the opening of baseball games.
and what would be wrong with that? lol maybe the "sex pistols" version of god save the queen would better as they are pistols involved. more to ya liking fella lol. that's the thing if they are given to the right people there's no problem but it don't work like that does it. do you reckon it will be the case of if they ban guns, all the bad guys will have them anyway? is that what everyones scared of...
"If they can't get hold of a gun, though, they can't"
Actually, about half of murders in the U.S. are committed by knives. Knives aren't as effective as guns, but they're more readily available. There were murders before guns were invented, and there will be murders after guns are outlawed. Afterwards, though, people will make their own guns for committing crime.
Look at your crime rate, since you've banned guns, it's started to catch up to ours. Your burglary rate is higher now, too.
Killabeee Your an Idiot, people kill other people every day without a gun, they use bats, rope, knives, fist, pipes etc etc. Your comment is with out a doubt the most ignorant response i have ever herd.
your the biggest ignorant cunt on the planet ain't ya buldy. you ain't got any relatives living in england have ya? cause i think i stood in it yesterday...
"Guns don't kill people. People kill people. We don't outlaw cars because some people drive drunk. The Founders realized that in order to retain and defend their liberty, a free people must be prepared to defend themselves from government tyranny."
government kill people to. Communist Cambodia, Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, Communist China. Lets ban government. Hell let's ban ideas too! Ideas created communism and fascism which lead to the deaths of what.. 100 million people by armed governments.
Her opening comment was BRILLIANT! The anti-gun nuts wheel out James Brady who was shot by a .22 pistol.... so he can testify about "assault weapons". ONLY a liberal could be so stupid as to NOT see the hypocrisy in that.
i recently read a great article on the subject and i feel the same way. it said that liberals are associated with anti authoritarianism but in fact, the combination of anti gun laws and regulation of personal consumption would be far more invasive of our rights as indviduals than the more visually apparent military action currently being taken by our republican leaders. and yes, that woman is totally right on the money!
Charles Schumer, a lawyer, just received an education on the Constitution. But based upon his ever-present smug appearance, he didn't learn anything. He's more of a threat to your Constitutional rights than any thug could ever be.
She went through a heart-breaking event that could have been different if SHE had HER gun. Most gun control, "nazis" if you will, don't own guns, and couldn't prevent anything, so they think the gun needs to be taken from the hands of the guy who, you know, got it illegally with the government having no knowledge of it.
BEAUTIFUL!!!! JUST BEAUTIFUL!!! "It's about being able to protect ourselves from you guys" She is right on the money! How come I didn't see this on the network news? LOL LOL Oh yea...I remember why,,, they're all leftist.
Too bad the quality is lacking in this vid but the argument she presents is the "Original" intent of 2nd amendment. Good Job she did on this presentation where can I find the full version?
boanerges144 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Cars kill 64 TIMES MORE THEN GUNS!!!!
>>>> Google "WISQARS Injury Mortality Reports"
PLEASE PASS THIS ON!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
We need as many tools as we can get to fight the media's ignorant, misleading and misguided propaganda about firearms, brainwashing society basically.
glenbjack 1 year ago
So your going to ban forks for making people fat too, right?
EntertainmentTrends 1 year ago
Best argument on the issue on youtube.
bobrobadob 2 years ago
Wow talk about well spoken !
Somethinzfishy 3 years ago 2
Last 15 secs. DAMN
seanxvw 3 years ago 2
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state..." I think we should obey the second amendment. If people really feel like they need to rise up and defend their state from the oppression of the federal government and/or that of another state or country, they should do so in a well-regulated militia. Because that's what the American Revolution was all about. It's everyone's right to do so. That's what people against gun control argue right? Oh, wait...
backtoyouth 3 years ago 2
Very articulate comment; unfortunately it's off the mark. The "well regulated milita" line is perhaps the most misunderstood and misapplied phrase in the Constitution. It appears only because the Founders argued over the philosophy of keeping a standing federal army vs state militias. They ultimately decided that a standing army would be a threat to the security of a free state and thus the concept of well regulated state militias should be supported.
crestonave1949 3 years ago
You seem to be a smart person but I don't really know what your opinion is. What point were you trying to make in correcting my info?
backtoyouth 3 years ago
I ran out of room to type. The right to bear arms is an individual right and does not relate to membership in a militia or army. The reference to "well regulated militia" refers to the outcome of the debate over state militias vs a standing federal army. Go back and read some of the writings of the Founders and you'll see that their intent was to clearly protect the right of the individual to bear arms.
crestonave1949 3 years ago
Actually, the second amendment should be supported; maybe all you gun nuts will do the world a favour and shoot each other out...
deepstich 3 years ago
God bless her.
fatty111110 3 years ago
Chuck Schumer makes me ill just looking at him.
stormflyer 3 years ago 2
you yanks are living in cowboy land. surely you gotta realise that guns kill people. if someone in america has a bad day they just get a gun and go blast people to death. guns are too easy to get hold of...
killabeeeeee 4 years ago
Guns don't kill people. People kill people. We don't outlaw cars because some people drive drunk. The Founders realized that in order to retain and defend their liberty, a free people must be prepared to defend themselves from government tyranny.
crestonave 4 years ago 6
yeah exactly people kill people! if they can't get hold of a gun though they can't.
killabeeeeee 4 years ago
Guns will always, always be available. It's important that they be available to the right people. If it weren't for guns, they'd be playing "God Save the Queen" at the opening of baseball games.
crestonave 4 years ago 5
and what would be wrong with that? lol maybe the "sex pistols" version of god save the queen would better as they are pistols involved. more to ya liking fella lol. that's the thing if they are given to the right people there's no problem but it don't work like that does it. do you reckon it will be the case of if they ban guns, all the bad guys will have them anyway? is that what everyones scared of...
killabeeeeee 4 years ago
"If they can't get hold of a gun, though, they can't"
Actually, about half of murders in the U.S. are committed by knives. Knives aren't as effective as guns, but they're more readily available. There were murders before guns were invented, and there will be murders after guns are outlawed. Afterwards, though, people will make their own guns for committing crime.
Look at your crime rate, since you've banned guns, it's started to catch up to ours. Your burglary rate is higher now, too.
AreThereNoMoreNames 3 years ago
Killabeee Your an Idiot, people kill other people every day without a gun, they use bats, rope, knives, fist, pipes etc etc. Your comment is with out a doubt the most ignorant response i have ever herd.
Buldy1 3 years ago 2
your the biggest ignorant cunt on the planet ain't ya buldy. you ain't got any relatives living in england have ya? cause i think i stood in it yesterday...
killabeeeeee 3 years ago
"Guns don't kill people. People kill people. We don't outlaw cars because some people drive drunk. The Founders realized that in order to retain and defend their liberty, a free people must be prepared to defend themselves from government tyranny."
Couldn't have said it better myself
Kujien 3 years ago 3
government kill people to. Communist Cambodia, Nazi Germany, Soviet Russia, Communist China. Lets ban government. Hell let's ban ideas too! Ideas created communism and fascism which lead to the deaths of what.. 100 million people by armed governments.
emp0rizzle 3 years ago
Her opening comment was BRILLIANT! The anti-gun nuts wheel out James Brady who was shot by a .22 pistol.... so he can testify about "assault weapons". ONLY a liberal could be so stupid as to NOT see the hypocrisy in that.
DeathScouter 4 years ago
i recently read a great article on the subject and i feel the same way. it said that liberals are associated with anti authoritarianism but in fact, the combination of anti gun laws and regulation of personal consumption would be far more invasive of our rights as indviduals than the more visually apparent military action currently being taken by our republican leaders. and yes, that woman is totally right on the money!
myteetharebleeding 4 years ago
Of course they see the hypocrisy. They don't care. It's not about what's right, it's about staying in power and being in control of everything.
crestonave 4 years ago
vote Ron Paul, he is ranked B by NRA!!
ukrainesergei999 4 years ago
Charles Schumer, a lawyer, just received an education on the Constitution. But based upon his ever-present smug appearance, he didn't learn anything. He's more of a threat to your Constitutional rights than any thug could ever be.
bruthav 4 years ago
Awesome, Patriot Movement!
Vote 4 Ron Paul!
Save The Constitution!
illchemist07 4 years ago
It's to bad more Americans don't have the common sense this girl has.
PONTIACDM 4 years ago
She went through a heart-breaking event that could have been different if SHE had HER gun. Most gun control, "nazis" if you will, don't own guns, and couldn't prevent anything, so they think the gun needs to be taken from the hands of the guy who, you know, got it illegally with the government having no knowledge of it.
beretta001 4 years ago
"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants... it is its natural manure."
Thomas Jefferson
teebteeb1268 4 years ago
BEAUTIFUL!!!! JUST BEAUTIFUL!!! "It's about being able to protect ourselves from you guys" She is right on the money! How come I didn't see this on the network news? LOL LOL Oh yea...I remember why,,, they're all leftist.
missymoosecow 4 years ago
"To preserve liberty, it is essential that the whole body of people always possess arms."--Richard Henry Lee
ntrinen 4 years ago
holy crap. she speaks the truth and she's on the news. hell has frozen over. Speak the truth sista!
merddyn2002 5 years ago 2
Amen. The second ammendment ensures the rest of them.
Kasmir145 5 years ago
That lady knows what shes talking about
And she told those bafoons the truth about the constitution.
dmxx99 5 years ago
I can only imagine how blue the moon would have to be to see coverage of THIS court case on television...
thorsmitersaw 5 years ago