A Rational Response (Una respuesta racional) - Greydon Square [mirror].mp4

[riverotter100]

Thank you for making a video with the lyrics in Spanish.

[redcloak676]

One must first prove god exists before you can discuss the who and/or what god IS, therefore your argument is irrelevant.

[ibahko1]

Good sir,

you are not in the least intelligent... you seem to be a proponent of reason and argument, and yet your argument to disprove pascal's wager is that it can be applied to anything and that therefore we cannot definitely know what or who God actually is. Yet the who and what seem to be very different from the question of whether he exists. So your statement does not address the question; hardly logical or rational.