CHRC Grilled in Parliament on Criminality, Hate Posts, Richard Warman and Abuse

[oldsoulify]

The Human Rights Comission should be disbannded.

[imfriggintelling]

No more gestapo.

[canadastreetmedia]

I thought the GOVERMENT of BRITISH COLUMBIA was supposed to stand up for the rights of CANADIANS,Not violate them.

[rickyhassan]

to the disbelievers / atheists ..( wat i m is not important.. u can think of me as anything u like :) )

"say to these disbelivers in His one-ness, i worship not that which you worship, nor will u worship which i worship,n i shall not worship dat which u are worshiping, nor whill u worship that which i worship, TO YOU BE UR RELIGION , AND TO ME MY RELIGION"

[emarin45]

Where did the lady in red go, the one reading the paper between 3:24 and 3:25, she disappeared in one second ? This doesn't look right, some fancy editing was done here.

[StaceyC123]

She's still there, it's just that the camera switched from the right side to the left side.

[emarin45]

Yep you're right , always nice to be corrected correctly. Thanks. I also agree with you that the people is not the problem it the religion, same analogy as its not the guns that are the problem its the people who press the triggers. God was invented by people to control other people through fear of death. Who would of believed that scam would run a couple of thousands of years.

[noncroyant]

I hate Muslims and I encourage anyone reading to hate them, too.

[StaceyC123]

MOST Muslims are no better and no worse than MOST Christians; however, there are extremists in BOTH superstitions who will gladly commit any atrocity in the name of their imaginary "god".

[noncroyant]

Bzzzt. Anyone who knows anything about both religions knows that Islam is an especially pernicious ideology. Muhammad was a mass murderer, bandit, thug, rapist, and child rapist. Compare that to the bio of Jesus. Both Muslims and Christians are encouraged to emulate Muhammad and Jesus, respectively. The typical Muslim in the world is as bad or worse than Fred Phelps.

[StaceyC123]

Just as "pernicious" as the superstition of Christianity, both based in mythology, and used by power-hungry zealots to further their own ambitions. The Muslims still have a long, LONG way to go to catch up to the global atrocities committed by Christians in the name of their imaginary "god", and the only reason they aren't likely to anytime soon is that there aren't any more undiscovered continents.

[noncroyant]

We don't have another self-hating liberal here do we? Western culture, taken as a whole, is the best thing the human race has created. Western culture owes a debt to Christianity which itself owes a debt to ancient Hellenistic philosophy. Have Westerners committed atrocities in history? Yes. Have human beings committed atrocities throughout time? Yes. The question is - when a Christian commits an atrocity - could he claim that Jesus has his back? You might find one or two quotes.

[noncroyant]

Most of the worst atrocities were committed in the un-Enlightened past as well. Muslims are committing atrocities TODAY. And no matter when they commit them they are following the example of al-insan al-kamil aka Muhammad (pigshit be upon him). Muslims are even more to blame for their present actions because they have the example of superior Westerners to learn from.

[StaceyC123]

So? Christians were doing as much or WORSE when THEY were the "unenlightened" ones, despite the fact that they had the supposedly superior example of your superstition to follow.

[StaceyC123]

I'm certainly no "liberal", if that';s what you're insinuating, but I'm also not so blind to history that I can see things only in terms of black and white. The 9/11 attacks were an abomination committed by zealots, as was the subjugation, torture, and enslavement of thousands of people by Christians in the name of Jebus. 9/11 was just another Tuesday, compared to the millions "Christians" killed at their height. And, yes, they all claimed to be "doing god's will", pinhead.

[noncroyant]

You're the pinhead who is trying to draw up a moral equivalence between Christianity and Islam. It cannot be done. Islam is decidedly morally inferior to Christianity by just about every measure, and this is an atheist telling you this. I suggest you educate yourself more about religion and religions before going off half-cocked.

[noncroyant]

Yet, unlike Muslims, Christians are NOT emulating the life of their founder when they commit horrors.

[StaceyC123]

No, instead they're emulating the example of their imaginary "god". The best argument against believing in ANY of these superstitions is to actually read what they claim to hold "sacred", and by that standard, the Christians fail just as badly as the Muslims do.

[noncroyant]

Yes, the Yahweh described in the Tanakh is a monster, but even back then he showed signs of being superior to Allah. He deigned to make contracts with lowly humans, for example, something Allah is too good for. Yahweh is described as having ordered the Hebrews to commit genocide, but even that was localized in time and space, unlike the universal commands of the Qur'an to convert, dhimmify, or kill. You're apparently also ignorant of the moderating influence of such things as the Mishna & NT.

[StaceyC123]

So, you're now claiming that the little magic books of Judaism and Christianity are both LYING when they claimed that their imaginary "god" set down their immutable laws as perfect? Your argument is reduced to claiming that "yes, this superstition is evil, but at least not as evil as that superstition"; EVIL is EVIL, no matter which imaginary magic man in the sky you claim to believe in, and no matter how "moderate" you claim that evil to be in comparison to another evil.

[noncroyant]

Lying about what, exactly? I get it that you have a simpleminded and puerile hate of Christianity; I *used to* be like that myself.

To appreciate my point compare what Muhammad (piss be upon him) said to do to adulteresses with what Jesus said. That's just one point of contrast, too, but it's a telling one. Another is "love your enemies." The irony is that you would probably have no difficulty in admitting that Buddhism is morally superior to Christianity-though monks can be jerks to laity.

[StaceyC123]

Both superstitions claim that their "unchanging god" and his/her/it's/their "moral laws" are morally perfect; that being the case, how come those laws were changed so often? I know for a fact that I'm morally superior to the "god" presented in the little magic books of BOTH of these superstitions, and so are the vast majority of the rest of humanity. I don't single out Christianity for any special "hate", ALL religions are ignorant superstitions, but few carry them to such extremes.

[StaceyC123]

They are BOTH ignorant stone-age superstitions based on the idea that an invisible magic man in the sky chose to make his wishes known to a specific "prophet"; the fact that "Christians" today choose to ignore the vast majority of the "laws" that their superstition forces on them (by a thorough reading of their little magic book) is NOT ANY SORT OF SAVING FEATURE; they are both equally barbaric when you compare their mythology and "moral guidelines".

[bbpro]

Very well said. As an atheist I agree with you completely.

[wullu5]

And the crickets crick as PET does not have anything to respond with and he knows it.

[Roadblock1080]

Thanks to the uploader and thanks to CPAC for allowing Canadians to view this and other committee hearings!

[StaceyC123]

Google "muslims who will saw your head off if you don't believe in their imaginary god"...

[MohammedSkaf]

This canada bullshit corruption is causing hate and terrorism.

[thunderflash82]

Are you talking about the CBC?

[jackson32]

What a joke a human rights commission gets a failing grade in ethics from the government watchdog group.

This is a slippery slope folks, they are saying free speech is allowed .... sometimes. Who decides this, and what are the ulterior motives? This is the first step to banning other speech that the government wants censored.

Isn't the whole idea of free speech supposed to be the idea that offensive idea are tolerated to protect EVERYONES right to free speech.

[jackson32]

What a joke a human rights commission gets a failing grade in ethics from the government watchdog group.

This is a slippery slope folks, they are saying free speech is allowed .... somtimes. Who decides this, and what are the ulterior motives? This is the first step to banning other speech that the government wants censored.

[PierreElliottTrudeau]

This is a tough line to tow. On one hand Ezra Levant is a despicable excuse for a human being. On the other I support his right of free speech. For Richard Warman to sue Ezra Levant for posting hate (which you did Ezra you are guilty of libel) should be upheld in a court of law. You have a right to free speech but if you post lies and outright fabrications which affect an individuals reputation you are guilty of this action.

[StaceyC123]

How the hell did Ezra "post hate"? He published a NEWS magazine, running a story on the Islamic uproar over a series of cartoons (2 of which were proven to have been drawn by mullahs themselves, to whip up riots). If he committed LIBEL, that's what the civil courts are for, not these 2nd-grade kangaroo courts. Pull your head out of your ass.

[PierreElliottTrudeau]

Ezra attacked Richard Warman in a series of articles in which he made a ton of false accusations. That is Libel. The cartoons are a separate issue altogether.

[StaceyC123]

In that case, the "Human Rights Commission" is STILL irrelevant, and if "Lucy" had any sort of a claim of libel, he was free to take it to civil court. Of course, if he does, that opens him up to cross-examination (the LAST thing that Warman wants), and he might have to explain exactly how he and his ilk are guilty of not only the very thing that they claim to be AGAINST, but also why they claim to be above the laws they claim to be trying to enforce.