My plan to get Ron Paul elected: I'm starting a Ron Paul Bumper sticker chain letter. Anyone who wants a free Bumper sticker email me your mailing address to prezpaul12@gmail.com and I'll mail you one for free. Then if you want to continue the chain, you mail off 10 Bumper stickers to other supporters at no cost to them. So on and so on until 63 million bumper stickers are on the roads in the US, Canada, and the UK. The Media bias loses its power. People Vote for Ron Paul. America wins.
@MakinItHappen77 And that's why the GOP stated publicly that they will make sure Ron Paul doesn't win. And they are. Hear any uproar about that? Of course not. Don't worry. It's all under control. Your cause is hopeless. Join your fellow Americans--grab another 6-pack, plant your fat butts on your couches and cheer for your favorite football team. Or glue yourself to another episode of Snooki. It's already over. We won.
Why did the video end abruptly. It would make more sense to show more sober know what was said after Ron Paul was mentioned. But I still have to thank Huckabee for mentioning Ron Paul. Maybe Huckabee has a conscience and knows Ron Paul is the best candidate for everyone, and particularly the religious people like Christians whose rights are more at risk than ever before. South Carolina voters did not get it unfortunately and metaphorically voted for Barrabas.
@RonPaulFriends2 You don't help at all by cutting at "Ron Paul"... you are allowing the MSM to accuse Paulites of using the similar tactics... you should be above that. RP is all about Moral high ground.
MANY polls have shown Ron Paul as having the best chance to beat Obama… what is Gingrich or Romney or Santorum going to say to Obama that isn’t hypocritical to any position they have once had themselves i.e. support for individual mandate, carbon taxes, open borders, gun control, support for TARP, etc
To hell with South Carolina nitwits, don't bother to vote. The USS USA is going down and there is no stopping it now. Ron Paul was your last chance. Disgusting fools they are.
@jcat2100 yeah, I really don't like him. But I don't like any of them this election... I really liked Herman Cain, but that retarded accusation ruined that... Still think it's a lie.
But yeah, I don't like him and I think a lot of his ideals are flawed... but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. I think he's close to the right track, and obviously what we're doing right now isn't much better...
We Americans are really fucked. Romney, Gingrich and Santorum are all the same candidate and will champion business over Americans, Ron Paul will bring us back to 1940 and champion states rights, which in some states is worse than what a president can do, and Obama cannot accomplish anything aside from taking rights away from Americans.
@RonPaulFriends2 I've been hearing talk about the mainstream neocon conservatives paying off officials in counties across the nations to count Ron Paul votes as their own...now, it sounds very paranoid, but if there's hard evidence proving such rumors...then criminal prosecution should ensue.
I still think Ron Paul is an idiot in many places. He's naive in so many issues... even with that said, I think I'm going to end up voting for him. While I think he's an idiot, I think the other guys may be slightly more... No matter who you vote for this election, it's 'damned if you do damned if you don't'. I think Ron Paul's ideas on economy are a better... I'm not holding my breath on his ideas on what to do with the military, I think what he wants to do with it is impossible.
@TheRawWord How is withdrawing occupation from other countries 'impossible' to do? We'd still have a strong military, just not occupying other countries.
@djthedadi Let me rephrase that; not impossible, but naive. What do you think 80% of our US bases are for? War? Noooooo, trade and shipping! It's one of our biggest profits! Not to mention other countries depend of them just as much. You want to withdraw troops from the middle-east, well that's one thing. But to remove ALL bases is political and economic suicide. I think he isn't going to hold out of that though. Once one of his advisers explains this to him, he's change his mind.
@djthedadi Let me rephrase that; not impossible, but naive. What do you think 80% of our US bases are for? War? Noooooo, trade and shipping! It's one of our biggest profits! Not to mention other countries depend of them just as much. You want to withdraw troops from the middle-east, well that's one thing. But to remove ALL bases is political and economic suicide. I think he isn't going to hold out of that though. Once one of his advisers explains this to him, he's change his mind.
@djthedadi@djthedadi Let me rephrase that; not impossible, but naive. What do you think 80% of our US bases are for? War? Noooooo, trade and shipping! It's one of our biggest profits! Not to mention other countries depend of them just as much. You want to withdraw troops from the middle-east, well that's one thing. But to remove ALL bases is political and economic suicide. I think he isn't going to hold out of that though. Once one of his advisers explains this to him, he's change his mind.
@TheRawWord I think you're the one thats being naive...He's not talking about removing embassies, which is what I think that you're thinking of. Military bases in these countries have nothing to do with trade. Like Dr. Paul has said before: what if someone like China sets up a military base in the US? Would we let that happen? Probably not.
@djthedadi Sir, I've worked on these foreign bases... I know what they are for. They aren't for war. Mind you, not ALL are for shipping. But definitely the majority are. Furthermore, the foreign countries WANT us there. Here's an example. Obama last year removed our base in iceland. As soon as we were out of there, Iceland's economy dropped. They're now begging us to return. It's not just a one sided benefit either. We benefit just as much.
@TheRawWord It's not that there are NO advantages, sure there are some. And I know we aren't actively fighting on almost any of these bases. The problem is the perceived threat that country/the world has on us. Also, our military is needlessly large and our economy cannot support it. Like I said before, even if it was said it was in the vein of 'trade', how would Americans react is China set up a base here?
@djthedadi Yes, but that doesn't support removing all bases. I've worked on these bases, I know the vast advantages in our economy and peace keeping. China isn't a country wishing freedom. Nor would they have good intentions with a base on our fields. You speak of two different countries. I speak of the founding father's ideals. I agree, we have unnecessary bases, and they should go. But not all of them!
@djthedadi I will bet the deed to my house. He won't go through with it. That's why I'm fine with voting for him. Just like you, he doesn't know any better. As soon as someone in the chain of command, with experience on the issue, meets up with him in the WH, he'll change his mind. There's no way he wouldn't once he is advised on the issue, unless of course he truly is stupid. But I don't think he's that stupid.
@TheRawWord To my knowledge, the founding fathers have said nothing even close to the notion that we need to occupy other countries. If you know of something I'm missing, please link me. We didn't start doing this until after WW2.. And yeah, like you said, we are there for "peace keeping". Its not our country, they can keep the peace for themselves. Unless there is mass genocide or a serious threat of an attack, we have no reason to be there in the current scale/capacity.
@djthedadi naive... I won't even try to explain it further... not because I don't think you capable of ever understanding, but because I don't wish to write a novel with the limited amount of characters I can use in this comment box. :P
Just mark my words. Though he says he will now, he won't remove all the bases. Simple as that.
Let's be honest with ourselves. He won't remove all the bases because he won't win the election. But with that said, I don't think I've heard him advocate for the shutting down of all bases. There's nothing unconstitutional about having oversees bases. I think Paul is more concerned about the fact that policing the world and nation building is not in article 1 section 8, which requires an unnecessarily large number of bases and troops at great expense to the taxpayers.
"Noooooo, trade and shipping! It's one of our biggest profits!"
If I get this straight, military grocery stores are non-profit, and the base exchanges gets most of their profit used for "community activities aimed at improving morale among service members and their families." (Wikipedia)
Sounds like the main reason these stores exist if for the service mens sake, not because they're so profitable.
@djthedadi Furthermore. We currently have no more room here in the US for the military. What do you think will happen if we were to recall ALL our troops on foreign bases? They will ALL be let go! That's hundreds of thousands of jobs just gone!
If you want to remove SOME bases, go for it! We currently have a few bases out there that are no longer neccesary... however, his idea that we need to remove ALL is just crazy. He say's they're useless, he's ignorant to say that. But he'll learn...
@TheRawWord Obviously we'll still retain a quite large military on active duty - that will never change, they just won't be occupying tons of countries needlessly. Theres NATO for that, we don't need to go in by ourselves. And yes many will be let go. But currently these troops are generating no money for our economy while getting paid from taxpayers - when these troops do start businesses or the workforce, our economy will start to recover.
@djthedadi They aren't needless! Not all of them anyway. The founding fathers wished us to be world peace keepers. We have these bases for that reason. When you hear military, you think war. That's not their only purpose! If you honestly think they are needless, then that means you don't know what those bases are for. To say that they are generating no money is a lie! Where do you think foreign and american traders dock?
Where do you think world aid from disasters comes from?
@TheRawWord I don't think you have actually read much of what the founding fathers actually said. The vast majority of them wanted small government which goes completely against what you are implying. We were never the "Worlds peace keepers" until after WWII and we were never intended to be the world peace keepers by any of the founding fathers. A history lesson might help you out.
@TheScyy I have, Benjamin stated that we should be peace keeper of the world. Not world cops. (paraphrasing of course) Yes, we are definitely not doing such as of now. But there are many bases we have for that specifically for purpose. We are to have friends not allies. And those bases keep us at a neutral with many countries. Yes, NOT ALL. But I'm not talking of unnecessary bases, I'm talking only of the vital ones.
All of the responsibilities for the federal government are listed in Article 1 section 8. Being police of the world is not one of those responsibilities.
@TheRawWord Idiot is a bit harsh.. Im a veteran and currently deployed service member.. Ron Pauls plan for the military is the only plan that makes sense. What does not make sense is the current path that we are going down.. and anyone who believes that we are heading in the right path is an idiot if you ask me. Glad to hear you plan on voting for ron paul but please do some research on foreign policy and the monetary system and im sure you might change your idea on who is an idiot.
@tedgraves Idiot, fits very well. I think anyone that thinks their ideas are absolute are idiots. However that's 100% of politicians. So I say they're all idiots in the long run.
Ron Paul = Good. Bill O'Reilly= Bad. O'Really always pounds his points across but never gets the results he seems to be wanting. Take Obama winning for instance. Hannity is worse when it come to missing his wants. Ron Paul 2102.
the UK does whatever the US does.... and we want our troops home, we want to keep cutting spending, we want to use those troops for our boarders (what troops were originally for apart from war).
US the world is waiting for you... vote Ron Paul 2012
@EpicMusicNuts hello from tampa florida, Ron Paul 2012!
the rothschilds of the UK tell the US what to do through the federal reserve system
We need to End the FED here in the USA and your guys over there in the UK need to end the Bank of England, together we can do it if we are truly UNITED
Huckster is the poster child for all washed out Baptist ministers. If you want proof that evangelicals are a bunch of phonies look no further than this snake oil salesman. Yeah, sometimes even the knuckleheads in the media get it right: The three GOP stooges represent the establishment, the war profiteers, the bankers, the insiders, the lobbyists, greed and graft. Hey, Huckie, Ricky St.Orum wants to sell you a rosary.
@chopin999 - I'm speaking here more about his style of libertarianism than i am about where his money comes from. I would be surprised if some of his money didn't come from the Koch brothers and their mates - arch libertarians that they are - he's just been in the race a lot longer than these newer colts whinying all over the show. Kind of like a sleeper cell, but, the newer colts are all so idiotic, people are finally starting to think there's some merit in his recognizability.
@julianchosun free market...that's what's up...and if big oil makes money, then so be it. Do you care if Apple makes money? What about youtube? They sold out for 1 billion...
Finally the mainstream media gets something right!!!!!!! Typical You Tube undercount 302 views. How do you have 355 likes from 302 views. They always screw Ron Paul anyway they can!!!!!!!!! Watch the likes will go up exponentially, yet the views will stay at or around 302-303.
@rey29rubi unfortunately it's not going to be 'same old shit'. The 'kicking the can' metaphore widely used in the media recently also is very misleading I think. It is a SNOWBALL and things are deteriorating badly. Maybe that Mayan dude was right about 2012
it seems every video that i see about ron paul always cuts off right after they say his name, or they are about to actually go deeper into the subject. bullshit
@acotytamwiesz If he doesn't win, it's because we have a lot of retards in this country who believe whatever the news tells them. The news says Ron isn't electable, so people don't vote for him. Its disgusting.
@Imakeplanesboom Umm, need i remind you this country voted in a no-body, brainless twit for a president 4 years ago. You really want to give this country the benefit of a doubt of not being full of retards?
@acotytamwiesz We're trying man, we're trying, but you have to understand, we aren't deciding the fate. We're desperately trying to stop the powers that be from deciding the fate. Don't think that we have any more power than an oppressed people fighting a dictator. I'd say less since ours use stealth and trickery instead of open force. It's an intelligence war, and they are very good at it.
@PhyloGenesis I do understand and actually I am pessimist about RP odds;( But he has already done 300% of the plan in spreading the ideas. Millions of dedicated followers who will not rest and will educate others. Unfortunately here in Poland people who tried to spread the same ideas since 20 years were succesfully ridiculed, derided, totally eliminated from MSM, even manipulated out of the elections on some 'legal issues'. I envy so much that you have someone like Ron Paul !
Throw Obama in the mix as well. There's really no structural difference between a Gingrich and Obama, for example. They both think government is the solution, instead of the cause to our problems. Gingrich supported TARP and individual Healthcare mandate.
@MrTitiez No, it IS the people's fault. For being to stupid and believing EVERTYTHING the media tells them. Instead of looking up the facts on their own online.
except for with ron paul is the most important part. like megatroll said us fat ass lazy ignorant americans need to wake the fck up to who is actually bringing change to the table because the rest are just a conservative obama. they differ slightly on certain issues but for the most part things will not change in the US like they promise look and newts record look and santorums record and romney is shady his tax plan sucks for the working class and yet again he stand of both sides of most issues
Notice the reluctant and dismissive way that pseudo-christian phony mentions Ron Paul. The reason the liars and propagandists hate Ron Paul so much is that his mere presence in interviews and debates exposes them for what they are.
Ron Paul is the only sensible candidate, the only one that is 100% real and consistent. It's pathetic the media is covering Romney, Gingrich and Santorum all bickering about what they said or what they didn't say in the past. Do u see Ron Paul caught up in this bullshit drama? No because the man is consistent with his ideas! Don't fall to the propaganda, Ron Paul for freedom. Ron Paul for 2012!
They say that they are the "same" like it is a good thing, all but Ron Paul of course, he's the devil incarnate to neocons and libs alike, but a near savoir for average folks like us!
@jestersyx Why are you attacking our European brothers? They are surrounded by Zionist neocons and elite bankers and lying media just like us. We are in the same house/boat. We both need to get things straightened out and help one another to destroy and hang the "international banking cartels" and their fake money systems.
How could they be voting personalities when they dont have one ? They are just talking points to make you think you have a choice. America is screwed without RON PAUL. A vote for anyone else is a vote for tyranny.Gingrich Criminal. Romney Criminal, Santorum IDIOT. They all want more war and your money. WAKE UP ! America no one is talking about how wall street raped America. And that they all need prison time. They talk politics Paul talks POLICY. And he has never changed in 30 years.
This has been flagged as spam show
My plan to get Ron Paul elected: I'm starting a Ron Paul Bumper sticker chain letter. Anyone who wants a free Bumper sticker email me your mailing address to prezpaul12@gmail.com and I'll mail you one for free. Then if you want to continue the chain, you mail off 10 Bumper stickers to other supporters at no cost to them. So on and so on until 63 million bumper stickers are on the roads in the US, Canada, and the UK. The Media bias loses its power. People Vote for Ron Paul. America wins.
redeyesawake2006 3 weeks ago
@32whatsup What is the name of your video
DFWDUB 1 month ago
Ron Paul is the only guy who is different. He isn't part of the gross corruption that is ruining our nation.
MakinItHappen77 1 month ago 2
@MakinItHappen77 And that's why the GOP stated publicly that they will make sure Ron Paul doesn't win. And they are. Hear any uproar about that? Of course not. Don't worry. It's all under control. Your cause is hopeless. Join your fellow Americans--grab another 6-pack, plant your fat butts on your couches and cheer for your favorite football team. Or glue yourself to another episode of Snooki. It's already over. We won.
LeonTee1917 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RP IS STILL IN THE RACE DON'T BE DISCOURAGED BY THE CORRUPT MEDIA!!! THERE ARE MANY FACTORS THAT DECIDE A CANDIDATE WATCH TO UNDERSTAND PLEASE
-
watch?v=nwL5pVZj8SE
-
SPREAD THE MESSAGE RON PAUL 2012 RON PAUL 4VR
WeBeItching 1 month ago
RON PAUL 2012.
bwild61 1 month ago
Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, Obama, Clinton, left, right, republican, democrat, whatever. Ron Paul against the machine.
bthegood 1 month ago 6
EVERYONE TELL EVERYBODY ABOUT RON PAUL HIS NAME HIS MESSAGE NEEDS TO BE SPREAD THROUGHOUT THE HOUSEHOLD OF EVERY AMERICAN.
kmesprtan 1 month ago 9
Why did the video end abruptly. It would make more sense to show more sober know what was said after Ron Paul was mentioned. But I still have to thank Huckabee for mentioning Ron Paul. Maybe Huckabee has a conscience and knows Ron Paul is the best candidate for everyone, and particularly the religious people like Christians whose rights are more at risk than ever before. South Carolina voters did not get it unfortunately and metaphorically voted for Barrabas.
StopFear 1 month ago 3
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL SUPPORTERS CAN'T POSSIBLY EXPLAIN THIS
VIDEO --------------> watch?v=gyfgBLmKRSs
32whatsup 1 month ago
There's no difference between Romney, Gingrich, Santorum, and Obama.
ditkuss 1 month ago 6
@ditkuss
Abortion, gay marriage
JoeKopsick4Congress 1 month ago
Fox earning back some credibility.
jjenningsoh 1 month ago 2
@RonPaulFriends2 You don't help at all by cutting at "Ron Paul"... you are allowing the MSM to accuse Paulites of using the similar tactics... you should be above that. RP is all about Moral high ground.
dmg46664 1 month ago
way to cut it off at Ron Paul... you idiot
papescape 1 month ago 2
MANY polls have shown Ron Paul as having the best chance to beat Obama… what is Gingrich or Romney or Santorum going to say to Obama that isn’t hypocritical to any position they have once had themselves i.e. support for individual mandate, carbon taxes, open borders, gun control, support for TARP, etc
Eye2EyeIIIV 1 month ago 4
To hell with South Carolina nitwits, don't bother to vote. The USS USA is going down and there is no stopping it now. Ron Paul was your last chance. Disgusting fools they are.
MrJaundiced 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL OWNS MITT ROMNEY ---------------> watch?v=gyfgBLmKRSs
32whatsup 1 month ago
@jcat2100 yeah, I really don't like him. But I don't like any of them this election... I really liked Herman Cain, but that retarded accusation ruined that... Still think it's a lie.
But yeah, I don't like him and I think a lot of his ideals are flawed... but I'll give him the benefit of the doubt. I think he's close to the right track, and obviously what we're doing right now isn't much better...
TheRawWord 1 month ago
fuck jobs,, nobody cares about jobs, lets just get the criminals out of the government, then we'lle get to work. whose ready to do this? get a rope.
y0utUBeH8r 1 month ago
Ron Paul for President 2012!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
annajanek1 1 month ago
We Americans are really fucked. Romney, Gingrich and Santorum are all the same candidate and will champion business over Americans, Ron Paul will bring us back to 1940 and champion states rights, which in some states is worse than what a president can do, and Obama cannot accomplish anything aside from taking rights away from Americans.
dragonblack955 1 month ago
@RonPaulFriends2 I've been hearing talk about the mainstream neocon conservatives paying off officials in counties across the nations to count Ron Paul votes as their own...now, it sounds very paranoid, but if there's hard evidence proving such rumors...then criminal prosecution should ensue.
varanidguy 1 month ago 13
@varanidguy
/watch?v=FbuwbkqAe_A
RonPaulFriends2 1 month ago 3
Mitt Romney = untrustworthy & will do nothing
Newt Gingrich = untrustworthy & will do nothing
Rick Santorum = untrustworthy & will do nothing
RON PAUL = Will Restore America NOW!
Eye2EyeIIIV 1 month ago 2
Umm .. You forget about a fourth candidate Bill?
quicktimepools 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012
garrethdavis 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
It must be hard supporting a guy WHO WILL NEVER WIN ANYTHING....RP - the LOSER
TKDMike58 1 month ago
@RonPaulFriends2 still would like to see in what way
batmandaplaya 1 month ago
For once Oreilly and Huckabee told the truth.
libertarian4lyfe 1 month ago
They just endorsed Ron Paul and didn't even know it..lol
WHTSOXX74 1 month ago 65
@WHTSOXX74 haha exactly!! morons......fuck huckabee, "theres no difference between these guys, except for ron paul...." HAHA
caddyrolla123 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Contact Bill O'Reilly at the O'Reilly Factor:
Email: oreilly@foxnews. c o m
Online form: h t t p://w w w .billoreilly. c o m/pg/jsp/help/contactus.jsp
General contact:
Fox News Channel
1211 Ave. of the Americas, New York, NY 10036
Phone: (212) 301-3000, Fax: (212) 301-4229, comments@foxnews. c o m
Fox affiliates contact list:
h t t p://w w w.foxnews. c o m/story/0,2933,77538,00.html
PLEASE THUMB UP!
WhatsReallyGoingOnUS 1 month ago
America needs Ron Paul 2012!
1940Katyn 1 month ago 3
Ron Paul makes the robots look like robots..
MultiShadow1969 1 month ago 3
I cant believe that prick Orailly and I agree on something.
bladeproject1 1 month ago 2
@bladeproject1 Wait he could have thrown in Obama as well. The Goldman Sachs crew.
bladeproject1 1 month ago 2
@bladeproject1 lol, i was thinking the same thing and it felt very wierd
brianmenendez 1 month ago
I still think Ron Paul is an idiot in many places. He's naive in so many issues... even with that said, I think I'm going to end up voting for him. While I think he's an idiot, I think the other guys may be slightly more... No matter who you vote for this election, it's 'damned if you do damned if you don't'. I think Ron Paul's ideas on economy are a better... I'm not holding my breath on his ideas on what to do with the military, I think what he wants to do with it is impossible.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@TheRawWord How is withdrawing occupation from other countries 'impossible' to do? We'd still have a strong military, just not occupying other countries.
djthedadi 1 month ago 2
@djthedadi Let me rephrase that; not impossible, but naive. What do you think 80% of our US bases are for? War? Noooooo, trade and shipping! It's one of our biggest profits! Not to mention other countries depend of them just as much. You want to withdraw troops from the middle-east, well that's one thing. But to remove ALL bases is political and economic suicide. I think he isn't going to hold out of that though. Once one of his advisers explains this to him, he's change his mind.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@djthedadi Let me rephrase that; not impossible, but naive. What do you think 80% of our US bases are for? War? Noooooo, trade and shipping! It's one of our biggest profits! Not to mention other countries depend of them just as much. You want to withdraw troops from the middle-east, well that's one thing. But to remove ALL bases is political and economic suicide. I think he isn't going to hold out of that though. Once one of his advisers explains this to him, he's change his mind.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@djthedadi @djthedadi Let me rephrase that; not impossible, but naive. What do you think 80% of our US bases are for? War? Noooooo, trade and shipping! It's one of our biggest profits! Not to mention other countries depend of them just as much. You want to withdraw troops from the middle-east, well that's one thing. But to remove ALL bases is political and economic suicide. I think he isn't going to hold out of that though. Once one of his advisers explains this to him, he's change his mind.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@TheRawWord I think you're the one thats being naive...He's not talking about removing embassies, which is what I think that you're thinking of. Military bases in these countries have nothing to do with trade. Like Dr. Paul has said before: what if someone like China sets up a military base in the US? Would we let that happen? Probably not.
djthedadi 1 month ago
@djthedadi Sir, I've worked on these foreign bases... I know what they are for. They aren't for war. Mind you, not ALL are for shipping. But definitely the majority are. Furthermore, the foreign countries WANT us there. Here's an example. Obama last year removed our base in iceland. As soon as we were out of there, Iceland's economy dropped. They're now begging us to return. It's not just a one sided benefit either. We benefit just as much.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@TheRawWord It's not that there are NO advantages, sure there are some. And I know we aren't actively fighting on almost any of these bases. The problem is the perceived threat that country/the world has on us. Also, our military is needlessly large and our economy cannot support it. Like I said before, even if it was said it was in the vein of 'trade', how would Americans react is China set up a base here?
djthedadi 1 month ago
@djthedadi Yes, but that doesn't support removing all bases. I've worked on these bases, I know the vast advantages in our economy and peace keeping. China isn't a country wishing freedom. Nor would they have good intentions with a base on our fields. You speak of two different countries. I speak of the founding father's ideals. I agree, we have unnecessary bases, and they should go. But not all of them!
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@djthedadi I will bet the deed to my house. He won't go through with it. That's why I'm fine with voting for him. Just like you, he doesn't know any better. As soon as someone in the chain of command, with experience on the issue, meets up with him in the WH, he'll change his mind. There's no way he wouldn't once he is advised on the issue, unless of course he truly is stupid. But I don't think he's that stupid.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@TheRawWord To my knowledge, the founding fathers have said nothing even close to the notion that we need to occupy other countries. If you know of something I'm missing, please link me. We didn't start doing this until after WW2.. And yeah, like you said, we are there for "peace keeping". Its not our country, they can keep the peace for themselves. Unless there is mass genocide or a serious threat of an attack, we have no reason to be there in the current scale/capacity.
djthedadi 1 month ago
@djthedadi naive... I won't even try to explain it further... not because I don't think you capable of ever understanding, but because I don't wish to write a novel with the limited amount of characters I can use in this comment box. :P
Just mark my words. Though he says he will now, he won't remove all the bases. Simple as that.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@TheRawWord I agree with you on that, and there are SOME that we need. We just disagree on quantity and degree of necessity. Agree to disagree.
djthedadi 1 month ago
@TheRawWord
Let's be honest with ourselves. He won't remove all the bases because he won't win the election. But with that said, I don't think I've heard him advocate for the shutting down of all bases. There's nothing unconstitutional about having oversees bases. I think Paul is more concerned about the fact that policing the world and nation building is not in article 1 section 8, which requires an unnecessarily large number of bases and troops at great expense to the taxpayers.
diggingforgold 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheRawWord
"Noooooo, trade and shipping! It's one of our biggest profits!"
If I get this straight, military grocery stores are non-profit, and the base exchanges gets most of their profit used for "community activities aimed at improving morale among service members and their families." (Wikipedia)
Sounds like the main reason these stores exist if for the service mens sake, not because they're so profitable.
continues...
lAmWatchingYou 1 month ago
@TheRawWord
continued:
"As soon as we were out of there, Iceland's economy dropped."
Icelands economy crashed because of bad economic policies, not US withdrawal, AFAIK.
They're now begging us to return."
Where can I read about that?
"It's not just a one sided benefit either. We benefit just as much."
I thought the bases costed you money, not earned you money?
lAmWatchingYou 1 month ago 3
@djthedadi Furthermore. We currently have no more room here in the US for the military. What do you think will happen if we were to recall ALL our troops on foreign bases? They will ALL be let go! That's hundreds of thousands of jobs just gone!
If you want to remove SOME bases, go for it! We currently have a few bases out there that are no longer neccesary... however, his idea that we need to remove ALL is just crazy. He say's they're useless, he's ignorant to say that. But he'll learn...
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@TheRawWord Obviously we'll still retain a quite large military on active duty - that will never change, they just won't be occupying tons of countries needlessly. Theres NATO for that, we don't need to go in by ourselves. And yes many will be let go. But currently these troops are generating no money for our economy while getting paid from taxpayers - when these troops do start businesses or the workforce, our economy will start to recover.
djthedadi 1 month ago
@djthedadi They aren't needless! Not all of them anyway. The founding fathers wished us to be world peace keepers. We have these bases for that reason. When you hear military, you think war. That's not their only purpose! If you honestly think they are needless, then that means you don't know what those bases are for. To say that they are generating no money is a lie! Where do you think foreign and american traders dock?
Where do you think world aid from disasters comes from?
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@TheRawWord I don't think you have actually read much of what the founding fathers actually said. The vast majority of them wanted small government which goes completely against what you are implying. We were never the "Worlds peace keepers" until after WWII and we were never intended to be the world peace keepers by any of the founding fathers. A history lesson might help you out.
TheScyy 1 month ago
@TheScyy I have, Benjamin stated that we should be peace keeper of the world. Not world cops. (paraphrasing of course) Yes, we are definitely not doing such as of now. But there are many bases we have for that specifically for purpose. We are to have friends not allies. And those bases keep us at a neutral with many countries. Yes, NOT ALL. But I'm not talking of unnecessary bases, I'm talking only of the vital ones.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@TheRawWord
All of the responsibilities for the federal government are listed in Article 1 section 8. Being police of the world is not one of those responsibilities.
diggingforgold 1 month ago
@diggingforgold I understand that and agree. I don't believe we are meant to be world cops.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
@TheRawWord Idiot is a bit harsh.. Im a veteran and currently deployed service member.. Ron Pauls plan for the military is the only plan that makes sense. What does not make sense is the current path that we are going down.. and anyone who believes that we are heading in the right path is an idiot if you ask me. Glad to hear you plan on voting for ron paul but please do some research on foreign policy and the monetary system and im sure you might change your idea on who is an idiot.
tedgraves 1 month ago
@tedgraves Idiot, fits very well. I think anyone that thinks their ideas are absolute are idiots. However that's 100% of politicians. So I say they're all idiots in the long run.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
I want to smash Huckabee's and O'Reilly's heads together like 2 coconuts. Ron Paul 2012!!
SleazyAffiliate 1 month ago 2
Couldn't have said it better myself Bill.
RestoreReality 1 month ago
I still CANNOT believe bill actually said this, he would NEVER say this, +Huckabee actually agreeing with him.
MrSupergeek999 1 month ago
Never thought I would see O reilly correct on something.
kyle7412 1 month ago
@kyle7412 Oh come on, O reilly may be very one sided, but he's not THAT much of an idiot. I've been able to agree with him many times.
TheRawWord 1 month ago
Where's the full clip? I want to see how the conversation went after Huckabee mentions RP.
varanidguy 1 month ago 22
Comment removed
gotmildew 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012 Restore America NOW!!!
Drone1njj 1 month ago
Comment removed
gotmildew 1 month ago
Ron Paul = Good. Bill O'Reilly= Bad. O'Really always pounds his points across but never gets the results he seems to be wanting. Take Obama winning for instance. Hannity is worse when it come to missing his wants. Ron Paul 2102.
Hodaka90 1 month ago
fuck bill oriley!
he is always telling his audience Ron Paul doesn't have a chance and not to take him seriously!
he has the largest audience out of all the news shows so he is hurting us big time!
HE WILL FEEL REAL STUPID COME SUPER TUESDAY AND RON PAUL WINS A LOT OF THE STATES!
chuckclose1 1 month ago
Never has an O'Reilly clip had so many likes.
RON PAUL 2012!
Eric13251 1 month ago
LOL.
RP 2012
carloftomorrow 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012
the UK does whatever the US does.... and we want our troops home, we want to keep cutting spending, we want to use those troops for our boarders (what troops were originally for apart from war).
US the world is waiting for you... vote Ron Paul 2012
EpicMusicNuts 1 month ago 50
@EpicMusicNuts were trying but the media is against us and their has been voter fraud!
rmr355 1 month ago 2
@EpicMusicNuts hello from tampa florida, Ron Paul 2012!
the rothschilds of the UK tell the US what to do through the federal reserve system
We need to End the FED here in the USA and your guys over there in the UK need to end the Bank of England, together we can do it if we are truly UNITED
brianmenendez 1 month ago
@EpicMusicNuts exactly, the UK and Europe will come home and be at peace when Ron Paul is president.
fromero69 1 month ago
lmao for calling the guy a moron XD
And yes, nice that Ofuckrrley excluded Ron Paul from these morons.
MisterPikol 1 month ago
Ron paul, or face economy crisis AND the rest of the world will suffer as well. choose visely.
MisterPikol 1 month ago
these men are just making themselves look even stupider than they were a day ago! I really did not think the bar could be set that low LOL!
ONLYRonPaul1 1 month ago
R O N - P A U L 2012
TheCanucksfan21 1 month ago
No difference in candidates, you can't explain that.
Ramones1234100 1 month ago 2
Get Ready for Mass Awakening:
watch?v=zGDisyWkIBM
callmeyang 1 month ago
have i done the math correctly?
Gingrich=Santorum=Romney=Obama<RON PAUL
sears62 1 month ago 4
RON PAUL 2012
AUSTRIAN ECONOMICS
END THE FED
europa 1 month ago
Huckster is the poster child for all washed out Baptist ministers. If you want proof that evangelicals are a bunch of phonies look no further than this snake oil salesman. Yeah, sometimes even the knuckleheads in the media get it right: The three GOP stooges represent the establishment, the war profiteers, the bankers, the insiders, the lobbyists, greed and graft. Hey, Huckie, Ricky St.Orum wants to sell you a rosary.
sleuth51 1 month ago
So, if Romney=Obama, then logically, it follows that Gingrich=Santorum=Romney=Obama.
0Enidan0 1 month ago
Hell, Huckabee could jump in and there would be no difference, they are all neo-con minded politicians.
Ron Paul offers real change
midwestcharm 1 month ago 2
is this really fox news?
kirbz01 1 month ago
Comment removed
julianchosun 1 month ago
"RP is big oil money libertarianism just as much as any of the others."
are you for real??? you couldnt be more wrong
chopin999 1 month ago 4
@chopin999 - I'm speaking here more about his style of libertarianism than i am about where his money comes from. I would be surprised if some of his money didn't come from the Koch brothers and their mates - arch libertarians that they are - he's just been in the race a lot longer than these newer colts whinying all over the show. Kind of like a sleeper cell, but, the newer colts are all so idiotic, people are finally starting to think there's some merit in his recognizability.
julianchosun 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@morjan11 Rocky Anderson is better than Ron Paul.
RP is big oil money libertarianism just as much as any of the others.
More freedom in society - for big business - as if they don't have enough already.
Google or wiki search Rocky Anderson today.
Rocky Anderson: The freshest face and the only real alternative.
julianchosun 1 month ago
Right from Bill Orally's mouth to your ears. There's NO DIFFERENCE. Hell, even Obama's a neo-con on paper! Vote for Ron Paul.
BettyFordGalaxy 1 month ago
Rocky Anderson is better in every way than Ron Paul.
RP is big oil money libertarianism just as much as any of the others.
More freedom in society - for big business - as if they don't have enough already.
Google or wiki search Rocky Anderson today.
Rocky Anderson: The freshest face and the only real alternative.
julianchosun 1 month ago
@julianchosun free market...that's what's up...and if big oil makes money, then so be it. Do you care if Apple makes money? What about youtube? They sold out for 1 billion...
longof99 1 month ago
Finally the mainstream media gets something right!!!!!!! Typical You Tube undercount 302 views. How do you have 355 likes from 302 views. They always screw Ron Paul anyway they can!!!!!!!!! Watch the likes will go up exponentially, yet the views will stay at or around 302-303.
krs561 1 month ago
I'm sure it cut off when it did because they both said "But of course he'll never get the nomination..."
bpitas 1 month ago 3
I'm sure this precisely edited and is taken way out of context because Huck and Bill O'Retard *both* hate Ron Paul with a vengeance.
bpitas 1 month ago 3
Ron Paul or four more years of the same shit, you decide USA.
rey29rubi 1 month ago 96
This has been flagged as spam show
@rey29rubi Rocky Anderson is better than Ron Paul.
RP is big oil money libertarianism just as much as any of the others.
More freedom in society - for big business - as if they don't have enough already.
Google or wiki search Rocky Anderson today.
Rocky Anderson: The freshest face and the only real alternative.
julianchosun 1 month ago
@rey29rubi unfortunately it's not going to be 'same old shit'. The 'kicking the can' metaphore widely used in the media recently also is very misleading I think. It is a SNOWBALL and things are deteriorating badly. Maybe that Mayan dude was right about 2012
acotytamwiesz 1 month ago
What did Huckabee say after "but.."?
pinkfloydmgmt 1 month ago
@pinkfloydmgmt in Oreilly's No Spin Show!!! He said Ron Paul's name.. in a conversation with Bill O.. Wow...
franklencat 1 month ago
Ron Paul supporters would walk through hell to vote for him. Rain, sleet and snow are nothing. GET OUT AND VOTE!!!
billythebrainsoftain 1 month ago
it seems every video that i see about ron paul always cuts off right after they say his name, or they are about to actually go deeper into the subject. bullshit
guitarluver38 1 month ago
SOUTH CAROLINA GET OUT AND VOTE FOR RON PAUL!!
AlpaDog1983 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@AlpaDog1983 Rocky Anderson is better than Ron Paul.
RP is big oil money libertarianism just as much as any of the others.
More freedom in society - for big business - as if they don't have enough already.
Google or wiki search Rocky Anderson today.
Rocky Anderson: The freshest face and the only real alternative.
julianchosun 1 month ago
Comment removed
julianchosun 1 month ago
:D
Luieburger 1 month ago
Wow, could anything be more telling than these 34 seconds?
0TheBestMan 1 month ago
You can fool some of the people all of the time, and all of the people some of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all of the time.
- Abraham Lincoln
Marcello777 1 month ago 3
Bahahaha, this is too good. :)
MrDeathSmiles 1 month ago
wau,i cant believe myself i agree with bill oreily
bostjankramar11 1 month ago
"EXCEPT FOR RON PAUL" and then CUT. YES WE KNOW RON PAUL IS VERY DIFFERENT FROM THE REST. HE IS STANDING FOR THE REAL AMERICA. I'M VOTING RON PAUL
pttanz 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012
Poland holds breath while you decide fate of the world
acotytamwiesz 1 month ago 41
@acotytamwiesz If he doesn't win, it's because we have a lot of retards in this country who believe whatever the news tells them. The news says Ron isn't electable, so people don't vote for him. Its disgusting.
Imakeplanesboom 1 month ago
@Imakeplanesboom Umm, need i remind you this country voted in a no-body, brainless twit for a president 4 years ago. You really want to give this country the benefit of a doubt of not being full of retards?
D4rknb3h0ld3r 1 month ago
@D4rknb3h0ld3r It's not full of retards, it's mostly full of retards. Don't get lost in absolutes.
Imakeplanesboom 1 month ago
@acotytamwiesz We're trying man, we're trying, but you have to understand, we aren't deciding the fate. We're desperately trying to stop the powers that be from deciding the fate. Don't think that we have any more power than an oppressed people fighting a dictator. I'd say less since ours use stealth and trickery instead of open force. It's an intelligence war, and they are very good at it.
PhyloGenesis 1 month ago 2
@PhyloGenesis I do understand and actually I am pessimist about RP odds;( But he has already done 300% of the plan in spreading the ideas. Millions of dedicated followers who will not rest and will educate others. Unfortunately here in Poland people who tried to spread the same ideas since 20 years were succesfully ridiculed, derided, totally eliminated from MSM, even manipulated out of the elections on some 'legal issues'. I envy so much that you have someone like Ron Paul !
acotytamwiesz 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆ ۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
★ ☆ ★ ☆ RON PAUL 4 PRESIDENT 2012 ★ ☆ ★ ☆
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆ ۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
greatgatsb9o921o 1 month ago
Talking memos?
kaeserd 1 month ago
Can't stand Mike Huckabee.
alfvar 1 month ago
Throw Obama in the mix as well. There's really no structural difference between a Gingrich and Obama, for example. They both think government is the solution, instead of the cause to our problems. Gingrich supported TARP and individual Healthcare mandate.
larrybud 1 month ago
It's not the people's fault, it's the media's fault
that Ron Paul isn't the front runner.
MrTitiez 1 month ago 4
@MrTitiez No, it IS the people's fault. For being to stupid and believing EVERTYTHING the media tells them. Instead of looking up the facts on their own online.
Shonenut213 1 month ago
Well, I agree with you there, Bill.
kazoorocketman54 1 month ago
except for with ron paul is the most important part. like megatroll said us fat ass lazy ignorant americans need to wake the fck up to who is actually bringing change to the table because the rest are just a conservative obama. they differ slightly on certain issues but for the most part things will not change in the US like they promise look and newts record look and santorums record and romney is shady his tax plan sucks for the working class and yet again he stand of both sides of most issues
MrSleeps 1 month ago
Yeah please vote for Ron Paul !
If only we could have a guy like him in Europe...
SuperPostman 1 month ago
That's the first time I have ever agreed with O'Reilly. Ron Paul 2012!!!!!!
luwdmke 1 month ago
Notice the reluctant and dismissive way that pseudo-christian phony mentions Ron Paul. The reason the liars and propagandists hate Ron Paul so much is that his mere presence in interviews and debates exposes them for what they are.
scovell7 1 month ago 3
2 dislikes? i guess Romney and Gringrich saw this video.
D4rknb3h0ld3r 1 month ago 4
@D4rknb3h0ld3r It would be 3 but Santorum thinks the Internet is evil, I guess.
irishbug14 1 month ago
@irishbug14 lol
D4rknb3h0ld3r 1 month ago
Ron Paul is the only sensible candidate, the only one that is 100% real and consistent. It's pathetic the media is covering Romney, Gingrich and Santorum all bickering about what they said or what they didn't say in the past. Do u see Ron Paul caught up in this bullshit drama? No because the man is consistent with his ideas! Don't fall to the propaganda, Ron Paul for freedom. Ron Paul for 2012!
DANKinmyDUNGARES 1 month ago 3
They say that they are the "same" like it is a good thing, all but Ron Paul of course, he's the devil incarnate to neocons and libs alike, but a near savoir for average folks like us!
duanescot 1 month ago
Ron Paul stands out because he's a man of principle.
jme6141994 1 month ago
Because they're Israeli whores.
gentilewarrior 1 month ago
Isn't it great that the media has given us such a variety of candidates?
DrWPierce3 1 month ago
Both of these guys piss me off...
xFightingFalcon 1 month ago
Hey Europe, try getting your OWN house in order before telling us what to do with ours. And hell YES, Ron Paul 2012!
jestersyx 1 month ago 12
@jestersyx Why are you attacking our European brothers? They are surrounded by Zionist neocons and elite bankers and lying media just like us. We are in the same house/boat. We both need to get things straightened out and help one another to destroy and hang the "international banking cartels" and their fake money systems.
D4rknb3h0ld3r 1 month ago
First time I ever thought OReilly was right. I wonder when the Oreilly/Romney sex tape will emerge in the media
dirtylos30 1 month ago 2
"If we choose, we can live in a world of comforting illusion."
I hope that we choose not to though.
Talodus 1 month ago
i can't believe they admit ron paul is the only one who is different. i'm shocked. ron paul 2012
Punisher33100 1 month ago 2
For once, bill o reilley talks sense.
samuriguy909 1 month ago 9
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆ ۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
★ ☆ ★ ☆ RON PAUL 4 PRESIDENT 2012 ★ ☆ ★ ☆
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩☆ ۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
Joshthemetalhead1 1 month ago
@Joshthemetalhead1
RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul
RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul
_______RonPaul___Ron_______Paul___RonPaul__________RonPaul
_______RonPaul___Ron_______Paul___RonPaul__________RonPaul
RonPaulRonPaul___Ron_______Paul___RonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul
RonPaul__________Ron_______Paul___RonPaul___RonPaul_______
RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul___RonPaul___RonPaulRonPaul
RonPaulFriends2 1 month ago 2
"Except with Ron Paul"
Get off yer butt today and get out and vote for Ron Paul
snowbird29803 1 month ago 87
@snowbird29803 Been voting for him before Odingo got elected.
D4rknb3h0ld3r 1 month ago
Ron Paul 2012!
MendingMedia 1 month ago
w w w . drudgereport . c o m
VOTE RON PAUL
fanatix84 1 month ago
How could they be voting personalities when they dont have one ? They are just talking points to make you think you have a choice. America is screwed without RON PAUL. A vote for anyone else is a vote for tyranny.Gingrich Criminal. Romney Criminal, Santorum IDIOT. They all want more war and your money. WAKE UP ! America no one is talking about how wall street raped America. And that they all need prison time. They talk politics Paul talks POLICY. And he has never changed in 30 years.
lastpatriot4America 1 month ago
Comment removed
lastpatriot4America 1 month ago
You know what they say, out of the mouths of babes...
acem82 1 month ago
DRUDGEREPORT DOTCOM GO VOTE FOR RON PAUL ASAP!!! HES WINING THE POLL
MrGatoDelCielo 1 month ago
302th
dromeiro 1 month ago
I'd like to hear O'Reilly reaction to that last sentence...
dromeiro 1 month ago 3
Thank you Mike, I like that even Huckabee is giving his nod.
Hopefully Ron Paul will know how to use support from Chuck Norris.
vpotter2010 1 month ago
Wow, Bill O'Reilly is finally right about something....
xbradx11 1 month ago
thumbs up for bill oreilly stating the obvious
mjb9982 1 month ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
@mjb9982 Rocky Anderson is better than Ron Paul.
RP is big oil money libertarianism just as much as any of the others.
More freedom in society - for big business - as if they don't have enough already.
Google or wiki search Rocky Anderson today.
Rocky Anderson: The freshest face and the only real alternative.
julianchosun 1 month ago