uDo Not Know Hebrew very well. Jehovah is not aTranslation of Yahweh but aCompletely made up word. & uSay YHWH is undoubtedly 3Syllables not 2...but uDidnt prove why/why not.. Je-hosh-ua is not Jesus, it is Yahshua translated Joshua, once again uUse 2Many syllables & iDont see where uAre even getting them. iDont believe uUnderstand Hebrew 2Well, but iCan clear sum of this up 4Youu.. #YaHWeH
@JIIBlessed I don't claim to know Hebrew. But I do know the Bible. And there are dozens of Bible names that are derivatives of YHWH. Some use the first syllable, some the first two and some the third. The middle syllable was HO. Perhaps you might want to watch the video again. I explained that. by the way, Jehoshua is the Hebrew equivalent of Jesus. Joshua means "Jehovah is salvation." Jesus means "Jehovah is salvation." There are dictionaries that explain this. It isn't a mystery.
Why would we use an English "translation" of the eternal memorial name of the Creator? Jehovah is not the original name. No AbraYA (ancient Hebrew) name was mentioned in this video. "Isaiah" does not carry the "ah" sound because it comes from the "ah" in Jehovah. Isaiah is a completely made up name. Any reference book will tell you the original name for Isaiah is Yasha-yahuw. 143 other names have "yahuw" in them. Any guess as to the Savior's name? Yahuw. Creator's name? Yahuwah?
@Yahuwnathan The names Jehovah and Jesus are as old as modern English. If you want to make a pretense of speaking in another language I say go all the way and speak all proper Hebrew and Greek names in Hebrew and Greek. Maybe you suppose that makes you holy of something. I think it just makes you out to be a clown.
Respond to this video... Using the original name of the Creator rather than the English translation was not my idea. It was His: YAHUWAH, the God of hosts, YAHUWAH is His memorial name. - Hosea 12:15. All those in the Other-nations who cannot now call upon My Name because they do not know, says YAHUWAH The Master, who does all He says. - Acts 15:16-17. And there is salvation in no other name, for there is no other name under heaven that has been given to men by which we must be saved.
This scares me. The reason it scares me is because when I got cancer I had plenty of time to research this, so I did, & thanks to already having a LOT of books, & the Internet; within 200 hours, I was already researching in circles. I found myself going over the same data again & again.
From my findings, there is either YaHUaH/YaHuWaH, or none at all-others were fact-less or in error-even the trusted "Strong's Concordance" was in error by it's own admission
Sorry man. There is no correct English pronunciation. Just a correct pronunciation of His translated name. And a translation is just that, a translation. His name is His name which is YHWH not anything else. Not God, not Iehova, not Jehova, not anything else. It's not JHWH, it is YHWH. So why pervert it? There are rules about how hebrew consonants are pronounced when next to another. Do some research. You'll find that none of them will say Jehova.
@lachitareptilian The scriptures say that everyone who calls upon the name of YHWH will be saved. So, how do you pronounce YHWH? The fact is, you can't. The perversion is on the part of those who follow the pattern of the haters of God's name who deceitfully seek to keep the name locked in a dead language and in an unpronounecable and impersonable tetragrammaton, divorced from the common vernacular.
@ewatchmandotcom And have in mind that in a language so complex as hebrew or aramaic words and even letters have a wider and vast meaning. So any subtle change, even a so called translation or adaptation to the current languages, makes huge a huge difference regarding meaning. I hope I've been as clear as possible since english is not my native tongue.
@ewatchmandotcom I disagree. He told his name to Moses. That's how you should call it. And nothing else. The language is dead if no one speaks it. And that does not even matter. He is not dead. His name is not dead. It becomes dead if we don't use it and replace it with the "common vernacular" names. A trivial analogy: how would you feel if I would call you otherwise then your true name?
@lachitareptilian You just don't get it. All Hebrew names are pronounced in the common vernacular. Also, just so you don't keep repeating the same nonsense, Abraham, Issac and Jacob and all the sons of Israel beofre Moses knew God's name.
@Jehovahourgod Interesting. I can point to the video... "REVEALED! THE SECRET NAME OF GOD - Amazing Last Days Revelation (Hidden "code")"....... I'm afraid we are just going to agree to disagree.
@oncearound2000 I guess we might be ALL in for a surprise when the CREATOR OF ALL reveals his NAME at the conclusion of this system of things. Until then I believe much is just speculation by this twisted and corrupt system controlled by Satan the Devil.
Many denominations use the name JEHOVAH including Jews. Even Pat Robertson stated the name of God is JEHOVAH. So the usage of the name JEHOVAH is not a Jehovah's Witness invention. The Living Bible, a non-witness Bible uses the name JEHOVAH consistently in the Old Covenant translation. Conduct the proper research and scrutinize certain text translations regarding the divine name. Remember "APOSTASY" entered into true Christianity and the divine name has been misapplied, no doubt, by Satan.
@oncearound2000 I guess we might be ALL in for a surprise when the CREATOR OF ALL reveals his NAME at the conclusion of this system of things. Until then I believe much is just speculation by this twisted and corrupt system controlled by Satan the Devil.
The word Jehovah is an older less accurate rendition of the letters YHWH. It originated with the early German translators of the Hebrew language and their sounds.
@Millinium77332010 = lol I do and i have. all you Jw's are the same... That was 4, count them 4 different books.. LOL and all you can say is NO and for me to what was it #### re-educate yourself before you make your ending statements thank you. :)####
thats funny... Mill you should urself and maybe you can pull away from the baby killin family killin cult.... ur all the same.... LMAO
once again, the only thing that matters is ""WTS are False prophets" there is NO way AROUND THAT!!!!!
The New Jewish Encyclopedia: It is clear that the word Jehovah is an artificial composite.(12)
According to the Encyclopedia Judaica, p. 680, vol. 7, "the true pronunciation of the tetragrammaton YHWH was never lost. The name was pronounced Yahweh. It was regularly pronounced this way at least until 586 B.C., as is clear from the Lachish Letters written shortly before this date."
Encyclopedia Britannica: The Masoretes who from the 6th to the 10th century worked to reproduce the original text of the Hebrew Bible replaced the vowels of the name YHWH with the vowel signs of Adonai or Elohim. Thus the artificial name Jehovah came into being.(10)
The Jewish Encyclopedia: "Jehovah" -- a mispronunciation of the Hebrew YHWH the name of God. This pronunciation is grammatically impossible.(11)
OMG, if this guy is going to talk about pronouncing hebrewnames, he should learn THE LANGUAGE. Yehovah is broken down as Yeh-o-vah, NOT Ye-HO-vah btw. It's Yeh-o-chanan, NOT Ye-HO-choanan.
Regarding a viewer's comment about "w" changing to "v," the Hebrew letter "vav" was pronounced with a "w" sound during the biblical era but in modern Hebrew is pronounced with a "v, "o," or "u" sound, depending on the word.
Regarding the correct "English" pronunciation of YHWH, there is no such thing. The only correct pronunciation of a Hebrew name is the Hebrew pronunciation.
You said that the "Hebrew letter Y" is translated as an "English J," but actually there is no "Hebrew letter Y" or "English letter J." The Hebrew letter is "yud," not Y, and should not be called by the name of a letter in another alphabet. The "J" is a letter in the Roman alphabet. There is no "English alphabet." English, and more than 200 other languages, use the Roman alphabet.
Regarding your references to "translation," you are using the wrong word. At times you used "translation" when you should have used "transliteration" and at other times when you should have used the word "transcription."
In 1270 AD a Catholic Spanish monk named Raymundus Martini came up with the name Jehovah for his book "Pugeo Fidei". He combined the vowels of Adonai and Elohim with the consonants YHWH to come up with Jehovah. So yes, Jehovah does have a Catholic origin. Up to this point in time, Yahweh was the preferred pronunciation.
Now, you said it's "Je-ho". Couldn't it be-as in many other languages, the "hw" together make the "ho" sound (just like "ps" in "psychology" just makes the "s" sound)? Or, how about the word "Hallelujah"? Shouldn't it end with "jeh" instead since it is not the last three letters of God's name, but the first three letters? So in keeping with what you're saying, shouldn't Ps 150:6 read, "Praise Jeh, YOU people"? Or, should "Jehovah" be "Jahovah"?
@rpierre777 you are demonstrating your ignornace of HEBREW GRAMMAR.. Hallelu Yah is correct. second the reason what it is Yeh-o-VAH is because the accent mark is on the last syllable NOT the second. and the heh is part of the FIRST syllable
It's just like the tradition of Dec 25th being Jesus' birthday. Even though no one knows for sure, do we still stick with the tradition of that day? If not, when does sticking with tradition regardless of new information found become right or wrong? Is it only when we disagree with the tradition that it's wrong? Or, is it right only when we agree?
I don't have a problem with keeping with tradition as long as we don't criticize anyone for not keeping the traditions of man. I use Jehovah and I use Yahweh. No different than my use of Yeshua and Jesus. The difference is, I won't tell someone who uses Yeshua they are not correct because they won't stick with tradition. Isn't that something the JW's condemn the churches for doing: sticking with their traditions?
Most who claim to be Christian, use the Yahweh pronouncement as a simple example that could be used to deceive people who have been talked to by Jehovah's witnesses because if the simplicity of the Yahweh pronouncing, it's a tough debate to assist the troubled in, considering they look towards the biggest powers a simple short cut explained (Such as Trinity) in religion for assistants, which Catholic hierarchy have claimed. This is just what I feel going on.
@TheRevenantStudios Actually, it is those claiming to be Christian using the "Jehovah" pronunciation "as a simple example that could be used to deceive people who" are not JW's. The attempt is to say, "If you don't pronounce it this way, you don't know God." Yet, they say, "Thus it is evident that the original pronunciation of God's name is no longer known. NOR IS IT REALLY IMPORTANT." (The Divine Name That Will Endure Forever) So, why stress the form of it then?
@WooDaInspirater u r more accurate because ELIYAHU AND OTHERS IN THE BIBLE HAD THE NAME OF YAH IN THEM OR YAHU LIKE YEREMIYAHU... READ PSALM 68;4 THE ONLY LETTER THE TETRA- IS MISSIN IS A DALETH AKA (D) YAHUWAH PLUS A (D) WOULD BE YAHUDA= JUDA TRIBE
Listen to him, he is giving you life saving truthful infomation about Jehovah, and it is for FREE! It could save your everlasting life, or secure your resurrection in the future. No one can't take that away.
Listen to him, he can't make it any simpler. What you learn from this man is the truth, and nothing but the truth! Do not turn off your learning, listening powers back to the worlds mass of mis-information. This is a gift to you from Jehovah, to learn the truth for FREE!
Robert, I think i'm going to have to say I agree with you on this one, though i'm perfectly fine with English translations that use "Yahweh." Preferably, if I were translating the Hebrew Scriptures, i'd leave it as YHWH or even use the actual Hebrew letters and allow the reader to translate it in accordance with his/her convictions and/or research. That's what I do anyway even when i'm reading Bibles with "LORD." I simply read it as "Jehovah."
@dhamamy If there is no Tetragrammaton in the 5,000 manuscripts of the NT that we have today. If people ala the JWs still want it there, it's going to be there no matter what faulty explanation they give. "SATAN made them take out God's name!"
Hey Brian. Your up late and I'm up early. Do I say 'good morning' or 'good night'? LOL Admittedly, it is not quite the quandary as the pronunciation of YHWH, still, all things considered. ;-)
My point is using names to properly address a person can be a bit taxing and annoying if over used. God don't have to be called by his name everytime you address him just like you wouldn't want to be hearing your name in every sentence spoken to you.
When it comes to the using a name to communicate with each other. You won't be talkin to someone and address them by their name in every sentence or even every other by that matter. I'm black and have a name but when around friends of the same race, all they address each other is by N**** even though they know names. Just like dude and man is used to conversate
Who cares if we get God's name EXACTLY right? Unbiased scholars dispute this, Robert. We can't get it exactly right, so why become such a stickler on this?
Like ChadtheBerean, I prefer to call him Father, just like Jesus said we should when we address him in prayers.
So, why not just stick with "Father"?
On the positive side, I think the way you did this video is actually quite clever and would love to learn how you did it!
His name is in the Hebrew Scriptures nearly 7,000 times. And in those Scriptures Jehovah states that it is his purpose to have his name declared in all the earth.
According to numerous prophecies eventually, even all the nations will be forced to know that "I am Jehovah."
So, yeah, God loves his name. And those who love God love his name.
On the technical side of things, I used Apple's version of Power Point, called Keynote, to put together a slide presentation using a chalkboard template. Then I rendered the Keynote presentation into a Quicktime movie and popped it into Apple's Final Cut movie editor. Then I bought a few sound clips of chalk on a board and erasers and added a narrative clip and synched everything up.
In reality the tetragrammaton were to be translated, it would be YHWH=JHWH according to the Hebrew. My point is you can't translate correctly a name if it isn't even a word. Translate letters yes but a name......come on man!
Pronounciations of names into different languages creates quite a fiasco. With God, his name wouldn't be suffice when it is all said and done cause he was before time, which is in fact before languages and words. Jehovah means "he causes to become". Put Jehovah in front of Jesus, "Jehovah Jesus". He becomes a Savior who is with us. A Name is more about who and what it defines.
Pronounciations of names into different languages creates quite a fiasco. With God, his name wouldn't be suffice when it is all said and done cause he was before time, which is in fact before languages and words. Jehovah means "he causes to become". Put Jehovah in front of Jesus, "Jehovah Jesus". He becomes a Savior who is with us. A Name is more about who and what it defines.
No. But I did take some Hebrew classes a few years ago. But admittedly I did not really get a handle on it. But this YHWH stuff is literally the ABC's, pretty basic. I think common sense can take us pretty far.
@ewatchmandotcom Forgive me for asking. I am not trained in the biblical languages and the very little greek & hebrew I know is from the scholars I've read.
No. That is not a logical fallacy. I was not appealing to popularity. Using Yahweh is not in keeping with the way all other Hebrew words are translated. It is not consistent.
"Some Bible translators have preferred to use the name Yahweh instead. But that is not consistent with the commonly accepted translation of other Hebrew names."
If that isn't an appeal to popularity, then what is the point of it? Would "appeal to inconsistency" sound better?
You might want to watch the video again and maybe this time take notes. But, by way of review: ALL proper names that are spelled with a Y in Hebrew are translated with a J into English and other languages as well. The consistency of that practice establishes a RULE. Reverting to Y in the case of Yahweh violates the way in which all other Hebrew words have been translated for centuries.
Huh? I was referring to the word Jehovah. It is in the Bible. Check it out. As I demonstrated, Jehovah is the correct English pronunciation. I am not a Hebrew. I am an American. We speak English. Most of us do anyway. Jehovah is the correct ENGLISH rendering of YHWH.
That if it were vitally important to use Jacob's name, you would announce it in it's original form. Otherwise, the translation is subjective, rendering both Jehovah & Yahweh correct.
Again, I suggest you watch the video again. Yahweh ain't right. The Hebrew pronunciation of YHWH is Yehowah. Yehowah is translated into English as Jehovah. Both are correct. If you speak Hebrew than it would be proper to use Yehowah. If you speak English the proper pronunciation is Jehovah. If you speak Spanish the proper pronunciation is Jehova, and so on.
The same rules apply to the pronunciation of Jesus, but for some reason people don't seem to get so worked up over the spelling of Jesus.
The claim the name must have had three syllables is a fallacy called "Begging the question," which I like to call "begging the supposition." His whole argument is based on error. The claim Jehoshua = Jesus is incorrect. Jeshua = in fact Jesus. Jehoshua is a "variation" of Jesus that = Joshua. He left out that the tetragrammaton could also theoretically be Jah+ a surname or title, such as Lord, or Sir. It is UNKNOWN. We're talking about ancient Hebrew.
I am in good company then because Jesus, Paul, John, Luke, Stephen and Peter, to name a few, are "massively ignorant" because none uttered the name Jehovah or Yahweh.
The name and the Tetragrammaton was never used in New Testament Writings. Your and The WT's wishful thinking just does not make it so.
You may want to rethink who is the "massively ignorant" one.
You implied the name of Jehovah was irrelevant and unimportant and cited the NT as proof--ignoring the OT prophecies. You are a slippery little weasel, aren't you?
If slippery is what you are looking for then I am sure you will see it everywhere you look.
If the Tetragrammaton and the name Jehovah is of the extreme importance that you and The Watchtower place on it then why wasn't it important enough for Jesus and the Gospel writers to use? Back up your grand claims with some proof.
Don't lie dhamamy I haven't called you any names....Now take your mouse to bible Gateway and put "Jehovah" under the keyword search and select American Standard Version and leave me alone. I'll be waiting for your apology.
Yes I know this. Jake seems to be under some kind of illusion that it is in the NT. The Watchtower's NWT I believe is the only modern translation that arrogantly and ignorantly puts it in the NT.
@dhamamy You are such a dishonest character dhamamy..no wonder you are no longer one of us...I never said that the name Jehovah was in the New Testament...this is in your mind....I was just pointing out that the name Jehovah was important to know...and requested that you see how many times the phrase "...and they will have to know that I am Jehovah" is quoted in the American Standard Version.....Do try to keep up.
This is ignorance at it's ugliest. You interjected yourself into MY discussion with Robert however you were too lazy to bother to read the thread to ascertain the context of the discussion. I asked you to do this however you still refused.
The discussion was re: the New Testament. Where is the name in Jehovah in the ASV New Testament? Even if it was by some miracle, I would then ask you which ancient manuscript could I find that referenced to?
As I said to Robert, all the wishful thinking in the world just does not make it so. Jesus simply did not use the name Jehovah. Fallaciously inserting it into a NT Translation does not somehow magically make it true.
If you call me foolish then you are calling Jesus and the Gospel writers foolish.
That certainly is your right. Good Luck with that.
It makes no difference if YHWH is in the NT or not. The OT prophecies make it clear that God will cause his personal name to be made known to the world as a prelude to its destruction. Removing God's name from the OT cannot prevent Jehovah from accomplishing the glorification of his name. It only insures the complete humiliation of the fools who have tried to suppress the truth.
The removal of Yahweh from the OT is as wrong as its false addition to the NT.
This ridiculous concern with the spelling etc. repeating the name like some magical incantation. Should not one be more concerned about what God's name represents? Truth being a key attribute of God..
Obviously this attribute of God (Truth) does not interest you. As you are promoting a falsehood about the name Jehovah in the New Testament. Let the scriptures say what they say. Rev 22:18,19
Why is it ridiculous to put forward the correct English pronunciation of YHWH? What is wrong with informing the public that Yahweh is not even a correct Hebrew rendering of YHWH? You may consider it unimportant and irrelevant, but others value knowing the truth
And just because I set matters straight regarding the pronunciation of the divine name does not mean I am unconcerned with other spiritual matters. As my work on the Internet testifies I speak and teach on all matters of biblical truth.
Fair enough. I respect your work and your denouncing the 1914 doctrine as untrue. What baffles my mind is your directing innocent people to the false teachers that conjured it in the first place.
Mat 15:14....And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
The name those who seek God must know is Jesus. The NT is clear.
The NT is also clear about adding or taking away from scripture.
Why am I being vilified pointing out that Jehovah is not found in NT?
I knew it ...dhamamy is angry because ewatchman knows the truth and now dhamamy is WORRIED.......He wants ewatchman to be one of his buddies condemning the WBTS......HALARIOUS.....
@ewatchmandotcom Good point. Here's a question I'm wondering whether or not it has been asked: Have you ever thought about the possibility of when the Bible discusses glorifying God's name that it could, in some instances, simply be speaking in general about His name? Like, His good name, or reputation? Do you think it always means "God's personal name"? I would tend to think that it could be referring to God's "name" or "reputation" at times.
Yes, of course. It all ties in though. Take the 3rd of the 10 Commandments, for example. There God's law forbid the Jews from using YHWH is a worthless way. Ignorant people today imagine that saying "god dam" is breaking the 3rd command. It's not. Of course, it is not a proper thing to say but the point of the law related to the mis-use of YHWH, not the word "God." And it shows that God required the Jews to respect his personal name.
uDo Not Know Hebrew very well. Jehovah is not aTranslation of Yahweh but aCompletely made up word. & uSay YHWH is undoubtedly 3Syllables not 2...but uDidnt prove why/why not.. Je-hosh-ua is not Jesus, it is Yahshua translated Joshua, once again uUse 2Many syllables & iDont see where uAre even getting them. iDont believe uUnderstand Hebrew 2Well, but iCan clear sum of this up 4Youu.. #YaHWeH
JIIBlessed 1 month ago in playlist More videos from ewatchmandotcom
@JIIBlessed I don't claim to know Hebrew. But I do know the Bible. And there are dozens of Bible names that are derivatives of YHWH. Some use the first syllable, some the first two and some the third. The middle syllable was HO. Perhaps you might want to watch the video again. I explained that. by the way, Jehoshua is the Hebrew equivalent of Jesus. Joshua means "Jehovah is salvation." Jesus means "Jehovah is salvation." There are dictionaries that explain this. It isn't a mystery.
ewatchmandotcom 1 month ago
Why would we use an English "translation" of the eternal memorial name of the Creator? Jehovah is not the original name. No AbraYA (ancient Hebrew) name was mentioned in this video. "Isaiah" does not carry the "ah" sound because it comes from the "ah" in Jehovah. Isaiah is a completely made up name. Any reference book will tell you the original name for Isaiah is Yasha-yahuw. 143 other names have "yahuw" in them. Any guess as to the Savior's name? Yahuw. Creator's name? Yahuwah?
Yahuwnathan 3 months ago
@Yahuwnathan The names Jehovah and Jesus are as old as modern English. If you want to make a pretense of speaking in another language I say go all the way and speak all proper Hebrew and Greek names in Hebrew and Greek. Maybe you suppose that makes you holy of something. I think it just makes you out to be a clown.
ewatchmandotcom 3 months ago
Comment removed
Yahuwnathan 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Respond to this video... Using the original name of the Creator rather than the English translation was not my idea. It was His: YAHUWAH, the God of hosts, YAHUWAH is His memorial name. - Hosea 12:15. All those in the Other-nations who cannot now call upon My Name because they do not know, says YAHUWAH The Master, who does all He says. - Acts 15:16-17. And there is salvation in no other name, for there is no other name under heaven that has been given to men by which we must be saved.
Yahuwnathan 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Shalom-Sadly that's confidently wrong.
This scares me. The reason it scares me is because when I got cancer I had plenty of time to research this, so I did, & thanks to already having a LOT of books, & the Internet; within 200 hours, I was already researching in circles. I found myself going over the same data again & again.
From my findings, there is either YaHUaH/YaHuWaH, or none at all-others were fact-less or in error-even the trusted "Strong's Concordance" was in error by it's own admission
Sven3xs 3 months ago in playlist Followers of YAH! - The Hiding of The Creator's Name
Sorry man. There is no correct English pronunciation. Just a correct pronunciation of His translated name. And a translation is just that, a translation. His name is His name which is YHWH not anything else. Not God, not Iehova, not Jehova, not anything else. It's not JHWH, it is YHWH. So why pervert it? There are rules about how hebrew consonants are pronounced when next to another. Do some research. You'll find that none of them will say Jehova.
lachitareptilian 5 months ago 3
@lachitareptilian The scriptures say that everyone who calls upon the name of YHWH will be saved. So, how do you pronounce YHWH? The fact is, you can't. The perversion is on the part of those who follow the pattern of the haters of God's name who deceitfully seek to keep the name locked in a dead language and in an unpronounecable and impersonable tetragrammaton, divorced from the common vernacular.
ewatchmandotcom 5 months ago
@ewatchmandotcom And have in mind that in a language so complex as hebrew or aramaic words and even letters have a wider and vast meaning. So any subtle change, even a so called translation or adaptation to the current languages, makes huge a huge difference regarding meaning. I hope I've been as clear as possible since english is not my native tongue.
lachitareptilian 5 months ago
@ewatchmandotcom I disagree. He told his name to Moses. That's how you should call it. And nothing else. The language is dead if no one speaks it. And that does not even matter. He is not dead. His name is not dead. It becomes dead if we don't use it and replace it with the "common vernacular" names. A trivial analogy: how would you feel if I would call you otherwise then your true name?
lachitareptilian 5 months ago
@lachitareptilian You just don't get it. All Hebrew names are pronounced in the common vernacular. Also, just so you don't keep repeating the same nonsense, Abraham, Issac and Jacob and all the sons of Israel beofre Moses knew God's name.
ewatchmandotcom 5 months ago
@ewatchmandotcom Yes I don't get it. Neither do you. Let's say Jssac everybody. Kisses.
lachitareptilian 5 months ago
"Is GOD's name YEHOVAH/JEHOVAH or Yahweh?" A non-JW's video that supports e-watchman's video.
Jehovahourgod 6 months ago
@Jehovahourgod Interesting. I can point to the video... "REVEALED! THE SECRET NAME OF GOD - Amazing Last Days Revelation (Hidden "code")"....... I'm afraid we are just going to agree to disagree.
oncearound2000 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@oncearound2000 I guess we might be ALL in for a surprise when the CREATOR OF ALL reveals his NAME at the conclusion of this system of things. Until then I believe much is just speculation by this twisted and corrupt system controlled by Satan the Devil.
Jehovahourgod 6 months ago
Comment removed
Jehovahourgod 6 months ago
Many denominations use the name JEHOVAH including Jews. Even Pat Robertson stated the name of God is JEHOVAH. So the usage of the name JEHOVAH is not a Jehovah's Witness invention. The Living Bible, a non-witness Bible uses the name JEHOVAH consistently in the Old Covenant translation. Conduct the proper research and scrutinize certain text translations regarding the divine name. Remember "APOSTASY" entered into true Christianity and the divine name has been misapplied, no doubt, by Satan.
Jehovahourgod 6 months ago
@Jehovahourgod I'm not saying we can't use the name Jehovah. Just pointing out where the pronunciation originated. I use Jehovah and Yahweh. :)
oncearound2000 6 months ago
@oncearound2000 I guess we might be ALL in for a surprise when the CREATOR OF ALL reveals his NAME at the conclusion of this system of things. Until then I believe much is just speculation by this twisted and corrupt system controlled by Satan the Devil.
Jehovahourgod 6 months ago
The word Jehovah is an older less accurate rendition of the letters YHWH. It originated with the early German translators of the Hebrew language and their sounds.
oncearound2000 6 months ago
@oncearound2000 Really? Where is your proof?
Jehovahourgod 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Millinium77332010 = lol I do and i have. all you Jw's are the same... That was 4, count them 4 different books.. LOL and all you can say is NO and for me to what was it #### re-educate yourself before you make your ending statements thank you. :)####
thats funny... Mill you should urself and maybe you can pull away from the baby killin family killin cult.... ur all the same.... LMAO
once again, the only thing that matters is ""WTS are False prophets" there is NO way AROUND THAT!!!!!
MaxsinIIII 10 months ago
The New Jewish Encyclopedia: It is clear that the word Jehovah is an artificial composite.(12)
According to the Encyclopedia Judaica, p. 680, vol. 7, "the true pronunciation of the tetragrammaton YHWH was never lost. The name was pronounced Yahweh. It was regularly pronounced this way at least until 586 B.C., as is clear from the Lachish Letters written shortly before this date."
MaxsinIIII 1 year ago
@MaxsinIIII Obviously the demons don't sleep. LOL
ewatchmandotcom 9 months ago
Encyclopedia Britannica: The Masoretes who from the 6th to the 10th century worked to reproduce the original text of the Hebrew Bible replaced the vowels of the name YHWH with the vowel signs of Adonai or Elohim. Thus the artificial name Jehovah came into being.(10)
The Jewish Encyclopedia: "Jehovah" -- a mispronunciation of the Hebrew YHWH the name of God. This pronunciation is grammatically impossible.(11)
MaxsinIIII 1 year ago
once again, the only thing that matters is ""WTS are False prophets" there is NO way AROUND THAT!!!!! so let move on
Webster's Collegiate Dictionary: "Jehovah" -- False reading of the Hebrew YAHWEH.(8)
Encyclopedia Americana: "Jehovah" -- erroneous form of the name of the God of Israel.(9)
MaxsinIIII 1 year ago
@MaxsinIIII those encyclopedia are not alwayz accurate SO plz, re-educate yourself before you make your ending statements thank you. :)
Millinium77332010 10 months ago
OMG, if this guy is going to talk about pronouncing hebrewnames, he should learn THE LANGUAGE. Yehovah is broken down as Yeh-o-vah, NOT Ye-HO-vah btw. It's Yeh-o-chanan, NOT Ye-HO-choanan.
Mencel89 1 year ago
Regarding a viewer's comment about "w" changing to "v," the Hebrew letter "vav" was pronounced with a "w" sound during the biblical era but in modern Hebrew is pronounced with a "v, "o," or "u" sound, depending on the word.
floridatamar 1 year ago
Regarding the correct "English" pronunciation of YHWH, there is no such thing. The only correct pronunciation of a Hebrew name is the Hebrew pronunciation.
floridatamar 1 year ago
You said that the "Hebrew letter Y" is translated as an "English J," but actually there is no "Hebrew letter Y" or "English letter J." The Hebrew letter is "yud," not Y, and should not be called by the name of a letter in another alphabet. The "J" is a letter in the Roman alphabet. There is no "English alphabet." English, and more than 200 other languages, use the Roman alphabet.
floridatamar 1 year ago
Regarding your references to "translation," you are using the wrong word. At times you used "translation" when you should have used "transliteration" and at other times when you should have used the word "transcription."
floridatamar 1 year ago
In 1270 AD a Catholic Spanish monk named Raymundus Martini came up with the name Jehovah for his book "Pugeo Fidei". He combined the vowels of Adonai and Elohim with the consonants YHWH to come up with Jehovah. So yes, Jehovah does have a Catholic origin. Up to this point in time, Yahweh was the preferred pronunciation.
JAT002 1 year ago
Now, you said it's "Je-ho". Couldn't it be-as in many other languages, the "hw" together make the "ho" sound (just like "ps" in "psychology" just makes the "s" sound)? Or, how about the word "Hallelujah"? Shouldn't it end with "jeh" instead since it is not the last three letters of God's name, but the first three letters? So in keeping with what you're saying, shouldn't Ps 150:6 read, "Praise Jeh, YOU people"? Or, should "Jehovah" be "Jahovah"?
rpierre777 1 year ago
@rpierre777 you are demonstrating your ignornace of HEBREW GRAMMAR.. Hallelu Yah is correct. second the reason what it is Yeh-o-VAH is because the accent mark is on the last syllable NOT the second. and the heh is part of the FIRST syllable
Mencel89 9 months ago
It's just like the tradition of Dec 25th being Jesus' birthday. Even though no one knows for sure, do we still stick with the tradition of that day? If not, when does sticking with tradition regardless of new information found become right or wrong? Is it only when we disagree with the tradition that it's wrong? Or, is it right only when we agree?
rpierre777 1 year ago
I don't have a problem with keeping with tradition as long as we don't criticize anyone for not keeping the traditions of man. I use Jehovah and I use Yahweh. No different than my use of Yeshua and Jesus. The difference is, I won't tell someone who uses Yeshua they are not correct because they won't stick with tradition. Isn't that something the JW's condemn the churches for doing: sticking with their traditions?
rpierre777 1 year ago
Most who claim to be Christian, use the Yahweh pronouncement as a simple example that could be used to deceive people who have been talked to by Jehovah's witnesses because if the simplicity of the Yahweh pronouncing, it's a tough debate to assist the troubled in, considering they look towards the biggest powers a simple short cut explained (Such as Trinity) in religion for assistants, which Catholic hierarchy have claimed. This is just what I feel going on.
TheRevenantStudios 1 year ago
@TheRevenantStudios Actually, it is those claiming to be Christian using the "Jehovah" pronunciation "as a simple example that could be used to deceive people who" are not JW's. The attempt is to say, "If you don't pronounce it this way, you don't know God." Yet, they say, "Thus it is evident that the original pronunciation of God's name is no longer known. NOR IS IT REALLY IMPORTANT." (The Divine Name That Will Endure Forever) So, why stress the form of it then?
rpierre777 1 year ago
There's an amazing amount of claims made without any references in this video.
ILYIAB 1 year ago
The middle syllable was not Ho. The more correct pronunciation of the middle syllable is Hu. The Tetragrammaton is pronounced YaHuWaH.
WooDaInspirater 1 year ago
@WooDaInspirater u r more accurate because ELIYAHU AND OTHERS IN THE BIBLE HAD THE NAME OF YAH IN THEM OR YAHU LIKE YEREMIYAHU... READ PSALM 68;4 THE ONLY LETTER THE TETRA- IS MISSIN IS A DALETH AKA (D) YAHUWAH PLUS A (D) WOULD BE YAHUDA= JUDA TRIBE
TiboTV 1 year ago
you sound like 1 of the brothers that does the voice over in dramas.
Banez1991 1 year ago
Listen to him, he is giving you life saving truthful infomation about Jehovah, and it is for FREE! It could save your everlasting life, or secure your resurrection in the future. No one can't take that away.
radoliz2 1 year ago
Listen to him, he can't make it any simpler. What you learn from this man is the truth, and nothing but the truth! Do not turn off your learning, listening powers back to the worlds mass of mis-information. This is a gift to you from Jehovah, to learn the truth for FREE!
radoliz2 1 year ago
Comment removed
ReligionOrTruth 1 year ago
NO QUESTION HERE!!!!!!
littleamigos 1 year ago
@littleamigos
your presentation was excellent!
littleamigos 1 year ago
Robert, I think i'm going to have to say I agree with you on this one, though i'm perfectly fine with English translations that use "Yahweh." Preferably, if I were translating the Hebrew Scriptures, i'd leave it as YHWH or even use the actual Hebrew letters and allow the reader to translate it in accordance with his/her convictions and/or research. That's what I do anyway even when i'm reading Bibles with "LORD." I simply read it as "Jehovah."
entrsnm3 1 year ago 2
@dhamamy If there is no Tetragrammaton in the 5,000 manuscripts of the NT that we have today. If people ala the JWs still want it there, it's going to be there no matter what faulty explanation they give. "SATAN made them take out God's name!"
whathehadas 1 year ago
@whathehadas
Agreed
dhamamy 1 year ago
:-) Way to go Robert !!! It's not like your not giving it every effort !!!
May "Jehovah" Bless you fellow man!
brianomdahl1 1 year ago
Hey Brian. Your up late and I'm up early. Do I say 'good morning' or 'good night'? LOL Admittedly, it is not quite the quandary as the pronunciation of YHWH, still, all things considered. ;-)
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
I love this very good!!
TWILIGHT2012ful 1 year ago
My point is using names to properly address a person can be a bit taxing and annoying if over used. God don't have to be called by his name everytime you address him just like you wouldn't want to be hearing your name in every sentence spoken to you.
whathehadas 1 year ago
When it comes to the using a name to communicate with each other. You won't be talkin to someone and address them by their name in every sentence or even every other by that matter. I'm black and have a name but when around friends of the same race, all they address each other is by N**** even though they know names. Just like dude and man is used to conversate
whathehadas 1 year ago
hahaha, this is awesome!
anzwertree 1 year ago
Who cares if we get God's name EXACTLY right? Unbiased scholars dispute this, Robert. We can't get it exactly right, so why become such a stickler on this?
Like ChadtheBerean, I prefer to call him Father, just like Jesus said we should when we address him in prayers.
So, why not just stick with "Father"?
On the positive side, I think the way you did this video is actually quite clever and would love to learn how you did it!
Grace and peace...Jeremy
jrichard1977 1 year ago
Apparently, Jehovah cares.
His name is in the Hebrew Scriptures nearly 7,000 times. And in those Scriptures Jehovah states that it is his purpose to have his name declared in all the earth.
According to numerous prophecies eventually, even all the nations will be forced to know that "I am Jehovah."
So, yeah, God loves his name. And those who love God love his name.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
On the technical side of things, I used Apple's version of Power Point, called Keynote, to put together a slide presentation using a chalkboard template. Then I rendered the Keynote presentation into a Quicktime movie and popped it into Apple's Final Cut movie editor. Then I bought a few sound clips of chalk on a board and erasers and added a narrative clip and synched everything up.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom Great Scott! Sounds like a lot of work!
jrichard1977 1 year ago
Yes. I think I probably spent 3 hours making a 5 minute video.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@jrichard1977
The point is, Jehovah WANTS HIS NAME TO BE FREELY USED in worship!
Nothing wrong with "Father", He IS our Father, but again---it's merely a title.
If I knew you well, would you like it if I called you, "Hey you!", or "YouTube Guy!"???
I think not.
Jehovah desires His Name to be used. And not desecrated or denigrated, as apostate christendom has done for many centuries.
JWinCT 1 year ago
In reality the tetragrammaton were to be translated, it would be YHWH=JHWH according to the Hebrew. My point is you can't translate correctly a name if it isn't even a word. Translate letters yes but a name......come on man!
whathehadas 1 year ago
LOL. This is comical!
Who do you think you are, a Biblical Scholar?
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHA!
Gimme a break!
pneumatheos 1 year ago
Robert...you do have a way of attracting ex-JW's that are so confused by your theology...I think they are worried.....
JAKEV25 1 year ago
This was great. Thanks for the lesson!!
TheExtremeBiblicist 1 year ago
You probably are unaware that there are variations of Jeho-shua. The original Hebrew name was Jehoshua. The shortened form was Joshua.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
YHWH is Jehovah? But we can't say for sure cause that was in the scrolls. The Tetragrammaton is the evidence of God's name but no real word for it
whathehadas 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Pronounciations of names into different languages creates quite a fiasco. With God, his name wouldn't be suffice when it is all said and done cause he was before time, which is in fact before languages and words. Jehovah means "he causes to become". Put Jehovah in front of Jesus, "Jehovah Jesus". He becomes a Savior who is with us. A Name is more about who and what it defines.
whathehadas 1 year ago
Pronounciations of names into different languages creates quite a fiasco. With God, his name wouldn't be suffice when it is all said and done cause he was before time, which is in fact before languages and words. Jehovah means "he causes to become". Put Jehovah in front of Jesus, "Jehovah Jesus". He becomes a Savior who is with us. A Name is more about who and what it defines.
whathehadas 1 year ago
Are there any Hebrew scholars or grammarians who agree with your approach?
October31st1517 1 year ago
I certainly hope not. That would be worse than a curse.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom Do you have any academic background in the hebrew language?
October31st1517 1 year ago
No. But I did take some Hebrew classes a few years ago. But admittedly I did not really get a handle on it. But this YHWH stuff is literally the ABC's, pretty basic. I think common sense can take us pretty far.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom Forgive me for asking. I am not trained in the biblical languages and the very little greek & hebrew I know is from the scholars I've read.
October31st1517 1 year ago
No, no problem. As I said, I am no Hebrew scholar either.
A wise old head once said: 'Even the blind boar can find the nut if he roots in the dirt long enough.'
So, yeah, I been rooting around in the Scriptures awhile. It is inevitable that you come up with something every now and then.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
"Some use Yahweh instead, but that is not consistent with the commonly accepted translation..."
- Logical fallacy (appealing to popularity).
I still prefer to call Jehovah "Father" as Jesus told me to in Matthew 6:9.
Interesting video though :-)
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
No. That is not a logical fallacy. I was not appealing to popularity. Using Yahweh is not in keeping with the way all other Hebrew words are translated. It is not consistent.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
"Some Bible translators have preferred to use the name Yahweh instead. But that is not consistent with the commonly accepted translation of other Hebrew names."
If that isn't an appeal to popularity, then what is the point of it? Would "appeal to inconsistency" sound better?
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
How about an appeal to adhering to rules of translation?
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
Rules according to who?
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
You might want to watch the video again and maybe this time take notes. But, by way of review: ALL proper names that are spelled with a Y in Hebrew are translated with a J into English and other languages as well. The consistency of that practice establishes a RULE. Reverting to Y in the case of Yahweh violates the way in which all other Hebrew words have been translated for centuries.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
But that doesn't mean it's correct. It's an appeal to popularity and authority. People used to believe the earth was flat, doesn't mean it's true.
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
Is the word John correct?
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
No.
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
Okay, then. I see what I am dealing with. So, why don't you go convince the millions of guys named John that they are spelling their name wrong? LOL
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
Because they're not Almighty God. That statement is irrelavent.
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
Oh dear.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
If it is so vitally important to use God's personal name, don't you think you should at least use the correct one?
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
I am using the correct one.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
Do you have a time machine or something? You traveled back to ancient Biblical times & listened to them utter the tetragrammaton?
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
Huh? I was referring to the word Jehovah. It is in the Bible. Check it out. As I demonstrated, Jehovah is the correct English pronunciation. I am not a Hebrew. I am an American. We speak English. Most of us do anyway. Jehovah is the correct ENGLISH rendering of YHWH.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
Comment removed
FairNskware 1 year ago
Example:
Jacob is actually "Yaacov".
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
Correct. Yaacov is Hebrew. Jacob is the English rendering. What's your point?
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
That if it were vitally important to use Jacob's name, you would announce it in it's original form. Otherwise, the translation is subjective, rendering both Jehovah & Yahweh correct.
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
Again, I suggest you watch the video again. Yahweh ain't right. The Hebrew pronunciation of YHWH is Yehowah. Yehowah is translated into English as Jehovah. Both are correct. If you speak Hebrew than it would be proper to use Yehowah. If you speak English the proper pronunciation is Jehovah. If you speak Spanish the proper pronunciation is Jehova, and so on.
The same rules apply to the pronunciation of Jesus, but for some reason people don't seem to get so worked up over the spelling of Jesus.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
"The Hebrew pronunciation of YHWH is Yehowah"
How do you know???
"Yahweh ain't right."
I didn't say it was! I'm not the one who is dogmatic about God's name, you are. I don't have a problem with either one.
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
@ChadTheBerean So what exactly IS your problem? (As if I didn't know)
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
I don't really have a "problem". Just making a point that it's okay to not use the Name "Jehovah". We can use Yahweh, Jah, God, etc.
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
@ChadTheBerean
The claim the name must have had three syllables is a fallacy called "Begging the question," which I like to call "begging the supposition." His whole argument is based on error. The claim Jehoshua = Jesus is incorrect. Jeshua = in fact Jesus. Jehoshua is a "variation" of Jesus that = Joshua. He left out that the tetragrammaton could also theoretically be Jah+ a surname or title, such as Lord, or Sir. It is UNKNOWN. We're talking about ancient Hebrew.
propagandatechniques 1 year ago
@propagandatechniques
I agree 100%.
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
@ChadTheBerean Mat 6:9 says, "YOU must pray, then, this way: "'Our Father in the heavens, let your name be sanctified.
What name is that?
JuanOz43 1 year ago
@JuanOz43
Jehovah of course.
My turn:
How does Jesus tell you to address Jehovah in this verse?
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
Irrelevant and unimportant. Phil 2:9
dhamamy 1 year ago
You are massively ignorant. God's central purpose is to make his personal name renown in all the world.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
No need to take such offense Robert.
I am ignorant?
I am in good company then because Jesus, Paul, John, Luke, Stephen and Peter, to name a few, are "massively ignorant" because none uttered the name Jehovah or Yahweh.
The name and the Tetragrammaton was never used in New Testament Writings. Your and The WT's wishful thinking just does not make it so.
You may want to rethink who is the "massively ignorant" one.
dhamamy 1 year ago
No. I will reiterate: If you think the NT has somehow rendered the OT prophecies irrelevant and unimportant, then, yes, you are massively ignorant.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
When did I ever say OT prophecies are irrelevant and unimportant?
You can't get around this simple fact......
Condemn me then you condemn all of the writers and saints of the New Testament. Most importantly you condemn our Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ.
Good Luck with that.
dhamamy 1 year ago
You implied the name of Jehovah was irrelevant and unimportant and cited the NT as proof--ignoring the OT prophecies. You are a slippery little weasel, aren't you?
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
If slippery is what you are looking for then I am sure you will see it everywhere you look.
If the Tetragrammaton and the name Jehovah is of the extreme importance that you and The Watchtower place on it then why wasn't it important enough for Jesus and the Gospel writers to use? Back up your grand claims with some proof.
Better yet, Look to the Son.
dhamamy 1 year ago
Hmmm...wasn't it Jesus that said he had made his Father's name known??????
Doesn't the Lord's prayer say.....Let your name be sanctified?...it is the very first words of the prayer...
Does it surprize you that the POPE just had the name "Jehovah" purged from all Catholic documents?
JAKEV25 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JAKEV25
"Doesn't the Lord's prayer say.....Let your name be sanctified?...it is the very first words of the prayer.."
Wrong. The very first words are "Our Father in Heaven". That's how He told us to address God.
ChadTheBerean 1 year ago
Hah....Go to bible gateway and search for these keywords under the American Standard translation.....
"will have to know that I am Jehovah"
JAKEV25 1 year ago
@JAKEV25
You are welcome to join the discussion Jake. However can you keep it in context?
I don't give a damn what the pope does.
BTW ASV does not contain the name Jehovah, I have that translation.
dhamamy 1 year ago
@dhamamy
Again dhamamy...you know NOT what your are yapping about...The American Standard Version does use the name Jehovah....
...and thanks for your permission to join in the discussion. Mighty kind of you.
JAKEV25 1 year ago
@JAKEV25
Quote the verse Jakey.
dhamamy 1 year ago
dhamamy....You are being silly...the name Jehovah is in the American Standard Version...you have the version...sit down and read it.
JAKEV25 1 year ago 2
@JAKEV25
Typical JW, resort to the name calling when they are lost.
Just admit you were wrong Jakey or quote the verse.
dhamamy 1 year ago
Don't lie dhamamy I haven't called you any names....Now take your mouse to bible Gateway and put "Jehovah" under the keyword search and select American Standard Version and leave me alone. I'll be waiting for your apology.
JAKEV25 1 year ago
@JAKEV25
The only one lying is you. You can't back up your claim.
Quote the verse!!!
dhamamy 1 year ago
the name jehovah is in the asv, just not in the new testament. ONLY IN THE OLD.
jtimmis 1 year ago
@jtimmis
Yes I know this. Jake seems to be under some kind of illusion that it is in the NT. The Watchtower's NWT I believe is the only modern translation that arrogantly and ignorantly puts it in the NT.
Thanks
dhamamy 1 year ago
@dhamamy You are such a dishonest character dhamamy..no wonder you are no longer one of us...I never said that the name Jehovah was in the New Testament...this is in your mind....I was just pointing out that the name Jehovah was important to know...and requested that you see how many times the phrase "...and they will have to know that I am Jehovah" is quoted in the American Standard Version.....Do try to keep up.
JAKEV25 1 year ago
@JAKEV25
You are one of the most ignorant and dopey JW's I have ever talked with. Go Away and serve your Brooklyn masters.
dhamamy 1 year ago
@JAKEV25 Is he now an apostate :O?
jesseZR 1 year ago
Genesis 2 ...its there many times...
JAKEV25 1 year ago
@JAKEV25
This is ignorance at it's ugliest. You interjected yourself into MY discussion with Robert however you were too lazy to bother to read the thread to ascertain the context of the discussion. I asked you to do this however you still refused.
The discussion was re: the New Testament. Where is the name in Jehovah in the ASV New Testament? Even if it was by some miracle, I would then ask you which ancient manuscript could I find that referenced to?
It doesn't exist Jakey. Wake up!
dhamamy 1 year ago
@dhamamy
The Name is there at least 4 times in the Christian Greek scriptures in EVERY Bible that I've researched!!
Are you so foolish that you don't even know it's there?
If you apologize to JAKEV25 I will show you where it appears in the KJ, ASV, NIV, etc. etc. etc.
JWinCT 1 year ago
@JWinCT
As I said to Robert, all the wishful thinking in the world just does not make it so. Jesus simply did not use the name Jehovah. Fallaciously inserting it into a NT Translation does not somehow magically make it true.
If you call me foolish then you are calling Jesus and the Gospel writers foolish.
That certainly is your right. Good Luck with that.
dhamamy 1 year ago
There you go beating up your hapless straw man.
It makes no difference if YHWH is in the NT or not. The OT prophecies make it clear that God will cause his personal name to be made known to the world as a prelude to its destruction. Removing God's name from the OT cannot prevent Jehovah from accomplishing the glorification of his name. It only insures the complete humiliation of the fools who have tried to suppress the truth.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchman
The removal of Yahweh from the OT is as wrong as its false addition to the NT.
This ridiculous concern with the spelling etc. repeating the name like some magical incantation. Should not one be more concerned about what God's name represents? Truth being a key attribute of God..
Obviously this attribute of God (Truth) does not interest you. As you are promoting a falsehood about the name Jehovah in the New Testament. Let the scriptures say what they say. Rev 22:18,19
dhamamy 1 year ago
Why is it ridiculous to put forward the correct English pronunciation of YHWH? What is wrong with informing the public that Yahweh is not even a correct Hebrew rendering of YHWH? You may consider it unimportant and irrelevant, but others value knowing the truth
And just because I set matters straight regarding the pronunciation of the divine name does not mean I am unconcerned with other spiritual matters. As my work on the Internet testifies I speak and teach on all matters of biblical truth.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom
Fair enough. I respect your work and your denouncing the 1914 doctrine as untrue. What baffles my mind is your directing innocent people to the false teachers that conjured it in the first place.
Mat 15:14....And if the blind lead the blind, both shall fall into the ditch.
The name those who seek God must know is Jesus. The NT is clear.
The NT is also clear about adding or taking away from scripture.
Why am I being vilified pointing out that Jehovah is not found in NT?
dhamamy 1 year ago
I suppose you will just have to deal with your own bafflement.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom lol
LESAM7578 1 year ago
I knew it ...dhamamy is angry because ewatchman knows the truth and now dhamamy is WORRIED.......He wants ewatchman to be one of his buddies condemning the WBTS......HALARIOUS.....
JAKEV25 1 year ago
@dhamamy
Are you saying Jesus is God? I would like to see that,
JuanOz43 1 year ago
@JuanOz43
Follow the thread. It is clear what I am saying.
dhamamy 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom "What is wrong with informing the public that Yahweh is not even a correct Hebrew rendering of YHWH?"
Hmmm...the "a" comes from Adoni and the "e" comes from Elohim. If you remove them, you have YHWH. Wait a minute! That's the Tetragrammaton!!!!!
What many cannot explain is why the "w" changed to a "v".
rpierre777 1 year ago
@ewatchmandotcom Good point. Here's a question I'm wondering whether or not it has been asked: Have you ever thought about the possibility of when the Bible discusses glorifying God's name that it could, in some instances, simply be speaking in general about His name? Like, His good name, or reputation? Do you think it always means "God's personal name"? I would tend to think that it could be referring to God's "name" or "reputation" at times.
jrichard1977 1 year ago
Yes, of course. It all ties in though. Take the 3rd of the 10 Commandments, for example. There God's law forbid the Jews from using YHWH is a worthless way. Ignorant people today imagine that saying "god dam" is breaking the 3rd command. It's not. Of course, it is not a proper thing to say but the point of the law related to the mis-use of YHWH, not the word "God." And it shows that God required the Jews to respect his personal name.
ewatchmandotcom 1 year ago
@jrichard1977 Lol, sanctify your name? How can that be any more clear. It doesn't say sanctify IN your name is says allow YOUR name to be sanctified.
jesseZR 1 year ago
good video! I loved it.
smallsushicat 1 year ago