Added: 4 years ago
From: supinder
Views: 47,600
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (249)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • LOL, so in otherwords global dimming counteracts global warming. Nice, no need for action and a good explanation for why we havent seen global warming in 15 years.

  • Green plants metabolise carbon dioxide. No rise of low level of this gas in the air is possible

  • The only thing causing Global dimming around here is the chronic haze being created via CHEMTRAILS! The video is actually funny in parts as it shows jets leaving what they call contrails when in fact they are clearly chemtrails. Notice also in some of the shots, the sky shows lines of chemtrail activity. What a "Global warming" hoax! If clouds cause act like a blanket to keep the earth warm at night, then what do you supposed all those man made clouds do at night? You can't have it both ways!

  • The BBC have bigged up Global warming to such an extent that energy costs have trebled in just a few years, are they working for the energy companies to give them an excuse to put up prices!!! And just like petrol the price always goes up but never comes down and of course the Government gets it's cut and the people of Britain suffer especially the elderly.

    Remember pictures of empty reservoirs, no water, the climate hotter than Spain etc etc etc!!!

  • xchopp, How old are you?

  • @13andincradiblycutt I repeat: 97% of credible scientists think that the +ve radiative forcing of CO2, CH4, CFCs, HFCs and other man-made gases is enough to overwhelm the -ve forcing from aerosols and clouds, although the latter is far from negligible (the subject of the documentary). If that is not enough for you, well, then what would be? You are the one lacking in skepticism; you are the one who has to justify their position here. P.S. The word logic does not require scare quotes.

  • @13andincradiblycutt You do not know that I am not a scientist -- but you should know that 97% of credible living qualified and active scientists (those who are performing research and publishing in peer-reviewed science journals) disagree with you and the late Dr. Bryson. Did you watch the documentary?

  • @13andincradiblycutt I can tell you that 97% of scientists think that the +ve radiative forcing of CO2, CH4, CFCs, HFCs and other man-made gases is enough to overwhelm the -ve forcing from aerosols and clouds, although the latter is far from negligible (the subject of the documentary). If that is not enough for you, well, then what would be?

  • @13andincradiblycutt So you are going to take one (dead) scientist's word over that of 97% of credible living qualified and active scientists? Now that's a level of skepticism so weak I can't believe you are serious.

  • @13andincradiblycutt Yes, you have to be a scientist to have an opinion on a scientific matter -- if you want to be taken seriously. Do you really think otherwise? If so, try making up your own remedy the next time you have a medical issue. Why bother with "experts"? Surely leeches will take the bad stuff out?

  • Being sceptical about climate change is (not/un they cancel each other) reasonable, doing nothing about it is reckless so go kill yourself

  • Informative and interesting. Whatever concussion(s) you come to from the data collected by scientist is yours. Personally I can see the logic in the explanations given in this 5 part documentary. I used to think it was too far fetched for the human race to really affect the earth's 'doings', after watching this and "HOMEproject" I'm concerned we obviously are, not good! Considering this it is really down to greed that we can not make the needed changes in ourselves and lifestyles (Not everyone).

  • @phantomscolts2 Wha? Try some grammar dude. Most of what you said did not make sense. Honestly, I'm interested in what your trying to say.

  • Anyone remember 'CLIMATEGATE'? Remember that at one time, experts KNEW the world was flat.

  • Use mighty power of nature for better climate.

    In the northwestern Australia, we have huge tides,

    huge deserts, huge evaporation and huge dry rivers and lakes.

    Huge 12m tidal river erosion can revive old dry paleo dormant once mighty rivers, creeks and lakes,

    desalinate the country and change deserts to rain forests to provide more rain across Australia

    World population is growing rapidly and we need more energy, food, land and water.

    see: Mitic CLIMATE ENGINEERING

  • Population dimming. At least when the BBCnt crow-barred in 9/11 they didn't say 'when terrorists flew jet fuel-laden commercial aircraft into the WTC buildings...'. What a load of social engineering. No stars. But thanks for the upload - best to keep an eye on what the enemy is up to.

  • What it says is that that global dimming refers to the climate cooling. It does not deny that the global warming is occurring. It is simply stating it is hiding the real warmth because of this cooling process. Pollution in our atmosphere reflect a greater majority of the incoming solar radiation. If we get rid of the pollution the earth will heat up to a greater extent. That's what this video is saying. Through global dimming we are not seeing the real warming of the earth.

  • For those of you that still haven't realised the CO2-scam almost a year after climategate, check out Svensmark's the chilling stars.

  • @kaskadaks Direct measurements of solar radiation show a slight reduction BUT the global temp continues to rise, so any "chilling star" effect is hiding even more global warming than has been measured. Making it doubly important for us to stop warming the planet with CO2!

  • @indulis1 Yes exactly!

  • CC is nuclear lies

  • There be far more pressing issues afoot for ye we Humans!! Wake up and smell what's on the end of your shovell!! as below so above.

  • Its a shame the BBC used to have so much respect around the world but to broadcast such a load of total bollocks with out 1 spec of real evidence makes you relies even the BBC is controlled by the Zionist's. All the media around the world is controlled by the Jews except for RT and PressTV for example. They show you what they want you to see and not what is really going on in the world. In the 70's we were told we were heading for a new Ice Age ? So does that mean I need a coat or not ? ? ?

  • Only a domesticated animal is oblivious to whats realy going on . This global warming is a Scam to control your food , water ,energy everything you need for life . Read big players books that fund the academics , fund the scientists own the media ect . They plant ideas, attitudes, cognitive strategies into you using professional methodology /authority figures , scary stories etc . It pains me to see how indoctrinated and weak minded most people have become ,

  • @ozzycriss

    you seem to be a domesticated animal, fed by the oil-industry-propaganda against the scientific fact of CC. Sorry, no harm meant, but I have critically studied climatology for a long time. Think again! Qui bono? Who has been inhibiting change and new concepts in the energy- and transportation-sector for a long time? The oil- and automobile-industry. Who funds the CC scepticism and why?

    But still, you are free to believe what you want.

  • Simple propoganda . show scary footage , add scary music , show experts , ect . Its called Imprinting and is used in psychology , simple stuff for the thinking person to understand . But the people pushing this rubbish know how ignorant most people are . They also know propoganda works very well on the weak minded . You've got to laugh people will be eating this up just like the climate change rubbish .

  • @ozzycriss Hey man, it is part of human nature to exaggerate things and make things seem worse than they are. But, the truth is there and it is not going away. Climate change has been occurring for a long time, but it is not decreasing in any ways, rather it is increasing at alarming rates. Yeah sure, they cover the news with chocolate and cherries maybe a few sprinkles here and there, but the facts remain.

  • Chemtrails chemtrails chemtrails..."global dimming"...

  • Nuclear fusion - as done by MIT: Power with no cO2 or toxic death!

  • Do not fall for this fraudulent religion known as cimate change/global warming. The AGW religion is really about socialist wealth redistribution that the two high priests Al Gore and David Suzuki are trying to implement through carbon taxes. Thank God for the CRU email hack which unveiled the truth to the world. Don't let your politicians sign any treaties. You must resist.

  • @harbar3000 Wow ... I want what you're smoking.

  • Plants were locking C02 away to keep the earth habitable in the face the sun's natural warming over billions of years.

    we come along and fuck it all up in a couple of centuries.

  • What it says is that that global dimming refers to the climate cooling. It does not deny that the global warming is occurring. It is simply stating it is hiding the real warmth because of this cooling process. Pollution in our atmosphere reflect a greater majority of the incoming solar radiation. If we get rid of the pollution the earth will heat up to a greater extent. That's what this video is saying. Through global dimming we are not seeing the real warming of the earth.

  • Everyone making negative comments clearly doesn't get it. Yea I probably would have been skeptical had it not been for taking college meteorology courses. This is clear as day to me. The problem is youtube is over run with trolls (Kids). Hopefully one day they'll get it.

  • WHAT COOLING? LOL!!!

    March was the HOTTEST March in the UAH 32 year satellite record.

    UAH (Univ. of Alabama, Huntsville) is run by Dr. Christy, the well known AGW denier.

    Global temperatures for February = 2nd WARMEST February in 32 years.

    Global Temperatures for JANUARY = the HOTTEST January for UAH in 32 years.

    HOT OFF THE PRESS - 4/10/10

    See the latest delightful YouTube from greenman3610

    Debunking LORD MONCKTON Part 1

    /watch?v=JfA1LpiYk2o

  • The world is cooling now! GW was nuclear lies

  • @JonThm

    the temperature change oscillates like the stockmarket, for similar reasons.

  • Question

    What does lower solarenergy reaching the earth mean to tempature.

    Thats whats important.

    Easy answer...... lower energy means lower tempature.

  • @NattyMarcus Plants sink CO2 to support life on Earth

  • this series tackles the common misconceptions and debates on the theory of climate change. not just the e-mails

    /user/potholer54#p/c/A4F0994AF­B057BB8/0/52KLGqDSAjo

    I highly recommend it.

  • GW is fatal fiction from nuclear power

  • Fuck you liars. LIE

  • you shouldn't discredit the debate...

  • Being sceptical about climate change is not unreasonable, doing nothing about it is reckless

  • Worst winter fro 50 years - so far! Nature happens, man lives with it. GW was fiction from nuclear power

  • Plants take in CO2. No change in CO2 levels in the air for recorded time.

  • @JonThm Please do not mislead people. Even Lord Monckton will gladly and openly admit that CO2 levels have increased, by about double in the past 100 years. Numerous scientific studies have shown this to be fact.

  • How can free CO2 increase? Plants sink it, to support life on Earth. Emissions and life have both gone up!

  • Plants ink all the CO2 they can get. And the temperature cooled from 1998

  • the masses are not the cause of global warming, it is semi natural but mostly due to the 'powers that be' messing with shit they shouldnt be messing with...mainly the ionosphere.

  • @pegobuilders Hi Pego. Normally I would say - that your wrong, doing nothing is not reckless. The reason being, is answered with the question "what is your solution?". And if the answer is eliminating the use of fuel, oil are economy will not be able to sustain itself. Are society is built on fossil fuel. Fossil fuels may eventually run out, and as they do a natural progression towards sustainable energy like solar etc. will likely occur. However, we cant do this yet...

  • ....because the technology is not developed enough. Solar panels are rather unpractical at the moment. They take alot of embodied energy to create, and their yield is low. They end up in the dumpster in a few years...

    But most troubling is the cap and trade which may prevent places like Africa, and developing countries from using oil to progress their economy as we had done.

    Also be aware of the special interest groups, ie Al Gore who will profit from climate legislation .. investigate this

  • by first i thought it was true. but its not, are you beliving in everything you hear? dont trust in media.

  • that's the problem, most people have lost the ability to think for themselves, they're like crabs in a bucket.

  • They based all this on one test one day with equipment that has no way of being calibrated.

  • PROFIT & CONTROL

  • The BBC are doing the PR for nuclear power! I don't say my licence for that!

  • The BBC are just a communist propoganda station

  • @properwired They do amusement, nto science! Usually with a built in left wing bias.

  • I've never thought about this, but now I realized I need to think in the near future.

  • Global dimming is real the chemtrails are blocking out the sun . I think the others on here will agree on a full ChemKast day

    it seems to be hotter those days .  The sky is not the right color .

  • We have technology to produce all our electricity needs using generators that run using magnetic attraction and repulsion. No fuel is needed. We have technology to use water as fuel in every combustible engine and jet airliner. These energy sources emit no CO2 but arent discussed because no money can be looted from free energy. Wake up People!

  • 'Climate Change' was fatal fiction from nuclear power, adn its stooges.

  • air conditioning alone pumps more climate change gases into the atmosphere than any other form of technology

  • How so? Are you including the CO2 emitted by the power plant making the electricity?

  • This is a science documentary. The scientists featured in it are all active in their respective fields (collecting data, publishing, etc.). If you think they are wrong, all you have to do is get your views published in a forum that requires more than a click on a 'Submit' button: the science literature. Good luck with that, yootoobers.

  • @xchopp

    Absolutely right! Still not only yootoobers are sceptical. The "scientist community" is just about as slow as climat change, because some findings like Wegener`s (1915) threaten their scientific view of the world so much, that it needs a new generation for the acceptance (1960), and another for the new view beeing brought to the educational system by the first students having become teachers.

    I´ve studied climatology in Würzburg until 2008 and yet I did not hear a word about it...

  • Global warming of climate, is the fact which is not requiring proofs. The consequence of global change of a climate negatively reflected to all people, without an exception .

     Global warming is not only altering wildlife habitat and changing the face of our planet, but it also poses a significant threat to human health and security.

  • 2005, the world started cooling. Is thisz guy an idiot? It would seem so.

  • propaganda they are making the skies dark with their chem trail jets all over the world as if preparing for some other being to live cause it sure does not do ua any good. culling the population down to 500 million so they can break out with the technology that we paid for and they have kept hidden, sky cars for one.

  • Nature deos clean nuclear fusion from water! Producing He and O. So can we! Safe, clean, cheap power with no toxic death!

  • Are they serious. Their is no way to hold everything in a controlled fashion in such an experiment. Their are many other things that could cause such a temperature change in that timeframe, and have cause equal changes over the same time frames in the past.

  • I have an M.Eng., adn think climate change is PR from nuclear power.

  • I respect your Master's degree. I respect that the science is not all done; that there are dissenting voices about the causes, extent, etc of anthropogenic global warming (agw). But, "PR from nuclear power:? Really? How is that remotely valid?

  • I am a Nuclear Engineer and even I dont agree with the idea of man made global warming. But even aside from global warming I think Nuc. power is required to meet the growing energy demands in an economically feasible fashion.

  • indirect semi-direct aerosol campaign

    youtube that (idiots!)

  • english immagrant....we never hear that all the time lol

  • Mill the South Pole, sort out the world weather.

  • It is a natural cycle, it is going to top off on Dec 21 2012, big changes are on the way.

  • Action is the Keyword here. May the robots on the internet be trained to go out and index better the placement, page rank and positioning of videos pertaining to the ever most important Topic "Climate Change" Googlebots take note here and index these type of sights and videos higher on your search engine. If you do this we have a better chance of Action being taken to help the ever evolving Climate Change Syndrome and Effects. Thankyou great video.

  • check out my campaign to help raise awareness...it get's a little messy :D

    "douchebag pie"

    copy and paste this URL;

    watch?v=7gPfQEnnuUk

  • You think this is crazy? Check out the crazy video on my profile!!!!!

  • "Global Dimming" effects the hydrological cycle of our earth. So weakening our earths water cycle. Reducing rainfall and threatening fresh water supplies. By spraying reflective particles in the air by planes in the form of chemtrails is infact going to kill millions of people, cause drought and starvation, melt the ice caps, damage our lungs, kill wildlife, make animals extinct and mess our earth up for good. Stop chemtrails NOW. They are murdering bastards. They are evil. They don't know it.

  • Just want to get a comment in before I finish watching the rest of the video.(stopped at 1:14)

    Most of the starvation of people in this world has its roots in political upheavals & wars. Hard to grow a crop when your running for your life.

  • tinyurl*com/cbs44b

    "Quietly in public, loudly in private, climate scientists everywhere are saying the same thing: it's over. The years in which more than 2C of global warming could have been prevented have passed, the opportunities squandered by denial and delay....

    The IPCC also finds that, above 3C of warming, the world's vegetation will become 'a net source of carbon'....

    Four degrees might take us inexorably to 5C or 6C: the end (for humans) of just about everything."

    -- George Monbiot

  • climatesafety. org

    "Following the record 2007 melt in Arctic summer sea ice extent, 2008 saw a record low in sea ice volume. Arctic climate scientists are now predicting an Arctic ocean ice-free in summer by 2011-2015, eighty years ahead of predictions made by the IPCC....

    An early Arctic melt will cause additional heating, as a shrinking ice cap reflects less sunlight into space; additional greenhouse gas emissions, as the ensuing regional warming melts frozen permafrost; ..."

  • "... and additional sea level rise, as the Greenland ice-sheet comes under increased temperature stress.

    Furthermore, the Arctic melt is taking place in the context of faster change in the climate than the IPCC have predicted. It is clear that the IPCC's predictions of future sea-level rises are underestimates. Potential predicted sea level rises would put us in the region of impacts orders of magnitude greater than any we have seen to date. Carbon sinks -- which provide the Earth's natural ...

  • "... capacity to draw carbon out of the atmosphere -- are degrading as temperatures rise and ecosystems are destroyed. The Earth's sinks have up to this point absorbed almost half of all man-made emissions -- we may not be able to rely on them to do so in the future. Ecosystems, already under pressure from human activity, are proving more vulnerable to temperature rise than anticipated.

    Change is happening ahead of schedule. This suggests that the climate is more sensitive than we thought ..."

  • Photosythesis can not be carried out as well as before and you will have stunted and eventually dying plants. See videos about China's industrial areas and the density of smog and there is poor light transmission. People in surounding villages can't even grow plants. But in areas without dense smog like where I am from I have noticed that every spring the Foliage seems larger and more dense than years ago due to increasing CO2.

  • I believe this story is accurate except for the idea of cooling. We still have created a layer of gaseos emmissions, CO2, Methane, whatever else as well as water vapour from aircraft or chemtrails for you conspiracy types. And the light transmission is lessened, this is true. But light still penetrates and is trapped as heat just not as much light. Pair this with increasing CO2 levels and you have lush dense growth. If light transmission is impeeded to extreme levels.

  • I have a green house and the layer of poly wrapped around it reduces the light transmission slightly but light still enters the house just less intensely than open air. If I inject CO2 from a CO2 burner above ambient CO2 levels of what used to be 340ppm, not sure what it is now a days 370 something. then my plants will use the CO2 which can double there speed of growth as well as size if levels are about 1000 to 1300ppm.

  • this is so drymatic

  • did he take measurements with the same instruments, same weather conditions and time of day and year? with similar conditions in the sky? measurements could be incorrect if these were not accounted for in his measurements

    our technology is different "improved" since then to now, just trying to think of ideas, also, sunlight would not come in to the surface as much through the clouds blocking sunlight out

    and also in turn, trapping what incoming solar radiation does get through inside

  • This is very serious because if it is true, all the research put into global warming would be useless. Imagine our scientists studying the wrong things.

  • This Is BBC so we know there are facts and lies. This is a hit-peice on CHEMTRAILS Global dimming is from Government airplanes spraying Chemtrails and they DO spray at night now. They have longer acting chemtrails now. This way you don't see as many of them. They are already spread out by mourning. I'm talking west coast here.

    I'm watching the superbowl commercials and yes they are full of CHEMTRAILS and dim skys. Search HAARP PATENT and study from there....Pray also

  • This is a ripoff of PBS NOVA, with a voiceover and annoying british usages like "a climate scientist CALLED Gerry Stanhill" instead of "climate scientist Gerry Stanhill". He isn't called that, it's his name! Forget the bad climate implications, let's get the names on the Titanic listed correctly as we go down.

  • one more united nation fraud...people watch aerosol crimes...

  • Fucking CHEMTRAIL AMERICANS!

  • The x crosses on sky right ?

  • Correct. But not only X crosses - also parallel trails ... Its sad, we have to poison us even more because of poisoning ourselves.

    Solution is simple - we have to remove 'mans behind the courtain'!

    Do not revolt! Do nt live like we are sopposed to! FUCK MENTALLY CHALLENDED AND POSSESIVE IDIOTS!

  • Oh, yes!!! But you know how they work. Those who control the media, control what the "masses" are supposed to think. They ARE the ones doing the Chemtrail spraying. And enough people are so sick from the metal particulate that they have lost the ability of critical thinking, so they believe what they are told by these so called "professionals". Yeah, Right. LOOK UP IN THE SKIES PEOPLE. Those are "CHEMTRAILS", and they are making you sick. See videos called "Chemtrail Particulate" here on YT.

  • lol

  • Good lord - does anyone watch what they look at on YT?

    Planes are NOT the point here: particle emissions, with its effect on cloud cover, with the further effect on daytime land temp, sea temp & sunlight reflection back to space, IS!

    The planes after 9/11 are a unique & graphic example of the process.

    The "warming" models gave results higher than the observable temps for years; add in "dimming" - they matched.

    Since 1990s with abatement of particulates, sunlight has increased & so has temp.

  • I only meant to say that once - but it was worth saying again anyway.

  • Good lord - does anyone watch what they look at on YT?

    Planes are NOT the point here: particle emissions, with its effect on cloud cover, with the further effect on daytime land temp, sea temp & sunlight reflection back to space, IS!

    The planes after 9/11 are a unique & graphic example of the process.

    The "warming" models gave results higher than the observable temps for years; add in "dimming" - they matched.

    1990s - since abatement of particulates, sunlight has increased & so has temp.

  • aahhhhhhhhhhhh help me were fucked for life

  • How do you get a 1 degree average with 3 days? Doesn't climate change many degrees daily? Isn't what scientist worry about is the average few degrees change over many years.

  • Planes were only grounded over US. Most flights are daytime. Contrails reflect during day and have time to dissipate at night when they would be insulating. After 9/11 enough planes were kept out of the sky over the US to alter temperatures. This was a regional phenomenon.

  • The fuel cell used in the Elding, a boat refitted in Vigo, Spain, will provide energy to auxiliary units on board via a battery that all boats already have. Doing this will avoid having to run the much larger propulsion motors in order to charge the batteries when the boat is not moving. This will save a great deal of energy and will reduce pollution when the boats in port. Maybe more efforts should be directed at developing clean hydrogen technology.

  • Absolutely fascinating. However, if true, commercial planes alone must not account for all of this. How about war planes? How much do they contribute to this?

  • Commercial aviation and transportation dwarf the military activity.

  • To = thearyan3 the last comment.

  • RACIST

  • Actually the latest science (scientific American magazine last month) has traced the gene patterns of all races and shows that everyone tracks from Africa. There is a very detailed migration route with dates for every location on earth. Hi five my funky brother.

  • To fools and frogs the ocean is Butt Knee deep. This may be how your ancestors got here.

    Frogs just need make it though the next twenty years and they will get prime New York wet land real estate. Ribbit!

  • it isn't commercial airlines doing this to us it's our government killing us with chemtrails.

  • Drunkenpuppies,

    AGW is an hypothesis - nothing more.

    As said - all emperical data show the hypothesis to be false.

    The head of the IPCC has now admited that there has been NO warming this century.

    Current data show the planet has been cooling for the 8 years.

    This is FACT - DO YOUR RESEARCH.

  • CobblyWorlds.

    We are now entering our 11th year of cooling.

    C02 levels are about the same. Why are we not warming?

    1934 is again hottest year on record not 1998 or 2005. This due to nasa screwing up the data.

    Direct C02 messurments, Ice cores, tree rings, sediment cores, pete bogs and recent datasets clearly show the C02 hypotheses to be false.

    IPCC say C02 forcing - it's just another theory to back up a failed theory = junk science.

    Do your research.

    Look at the emperical data.

  • I read the primary peer reviewed science as a hobby.

    The fact that you say we've had cooling for 11 years show you haven't a clue at all.

    1998 was a large positive outlier, after that temperatures continued to climb. If you look at the hemispheric data for CRU/GISS you'll see that it's only in the last few years that there's been a cooling blip, that is centred on the Southern Hemisphere and is likely due to ocean circulation changes.

    Check out the residuals for the last 30 years.

  • CobblyWorlds.

    Sorry my mistake - I should have said we are entering the 11th year of stasis and now recently cooling.

    My point remains valid.

    THERE HAS BEEN NO WARMING.

    C02 remains the same if not a little higher - but still NO WAMRING.

    This again is just more evidence that the C02 hypoptheses is FALSE.

    DO NOT BELEIVE - KNOW - DO YOUR RESEARCH!!!!!

    The C02 hypotheses is dead! - it is only the media and gov's(for money) that want to keep it alive.

    WAKE UP!

  • If GHG warming were not being seen that should be apparent over Eurasia (far from the Oceans where the atmospheric fluxes dominate). Yet Eurasia continues to warm unabated! While the cooling is centred in the SH & Oceans.

    Do you think picking up iron filings with a magnet refutes the law of gravity?

    Of course you don't.

    You understand that there's gravity, but there's also magnetism.

    Likewise, there's GHG driven warming, but (mostly) ocean changes cause the cooling.

    Good Bye.

  • The laws of gravity and magnetism are NOT hypotheses they are well established FACTS that can be demonstrated by anyone.

    The AGW hypothesis has been tested by scientists against all know empirical datasets and has FAILED every test.

    Thus the reason it is still only an hypothesis.

    Anyone can read the datasets and clearly see that there is NO correlation - it is that obvious!

    Gravity and magnetism can be shown.

    AGW is only an hypothesis and is NOT demonstatable with real world data.

  • The laws of Gravity and Magnetism are equations. As to what causes Gravity and Magnetism, those are theories.

    You would only expect a 1 to 1 correlation in a simple 2 elemant system. Aside from the long term CO2 impact there are more short term impacts La Nina's etc.

    Your 11 years is wrong because you're cherry picking 1998, after 1998 temperatures continued to rise on the same trend as before. Your supposed cooling is just a La Nina.

    CO2 has been shown to block infra-red - in the 1800s

  • Could you back up what you are saying with some references we can look? It´s OBVIOUS that CO2 is heating up the planet and i dont need to point to any NASA studies or stuff like that to back my argument. Just take a look at México City. CO2 is warming the city. It´s like a greenhouse effect there. Want empiric data? just go there someday and you´ll see. No need for "measurements" just ask people there.. If C02 can warm a city, why do you think it wont warm the plannet? C02 IS warming the earth.

  • Thanks for the info, and for the names. As for the research with your data, yes i did it. OK, as far as i understand...scientists cant say for sure that C02 is heating up the planet..but neither can they say it isnt. NOBODY KNOWS what´s happening..its like AIDS... So at the end in this matter..You are left to belive what you want to belive.. i rather belive it does..until it is CERTAINTLY TRUE IT DOESNT.. because i hate contaminating our plante anyway...

  • I must disagree with you when you say nobody knows.

    All indications from all messurements taken show the hypothesis to be false.

    In science if only one event in which the data didn't agree with the hypothesis, the hypothesis would be re-worked to explain why it didn't fit, then tested again until a workable theory is produced.

    This is NOT happening with the C02 hypoth.

    The data just doen't fit.

    Good on ya for doing the research, more people need to get off their bums and do it.

  • You sir are but a distant acquaintance of science

  • My reply was to c02lies

  • this is for c02

    people beleive in Glob. Warm. and some don't, so what- the planet is warming up but it trying to col down if we don't fight the prob. then the future is dead...

    ps. to everyone to...

  • CobblyWorlds.

    Do Your research into the science - NOT the IPCC crystal ball fortune telling.

    IPCC has consitanly got it wrong. Not one of they're predictions has come to fruition - NOT ONE.

    To lend any credibillity to them is a leap of faith and faith only. They DO NOT base reports on scientific evidence, junk hypotheses at best.

    So many scientists have now rejected the IPCC claims, others have quit and refused to be a part of it.

    What does this tell you?

    cont...

  • The question is - now that it's been shown C02 does't cause warming but is a result of warming - what will our respective governments do?

    C02 was there best shot at making a shit load of money out of thin air. Does the latest science mean carbon trading schems and tax's will be dropped. What about signatries to the Kyoto protocol?

    When will we learn -

    The problem is - there is no problem. Cliamtes change all the time and we'll probably never understand why....