Listen to Bob Lazar's account of how they tested an alien craft 'gravity amplifiers' and how they focused it into a 'small black dot' and made tests with it.
He was discredited and debunked by scientists more than 20 years ago when he said gravity have two types that acts on an atomic level and the normal kind and propagates as a wave, but now physicists all agree that this is true.
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Universe let it dilate entirely
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.
This Doc :)) is damn right, I allways thought we understand so little of physics cose we are using only 4 dimensions. Using only what we can see with our today senses , and creating math formulas with only 4 dimension is the thing that keeps us down.
I allways love Physics ..But i allways hated math. I believe we make huge mistakes using math to be able to describe physics. We should be able to comunicate our knoledge to each other without using math limitations. I bet human brains can conected ''wireless " and create super networks :)) without loosing all time and and loosing data using math as '' encrytion'':))
@scottjacobable they have found something that behaves different to matter, so assumption of existence of antimatter seems to be true ( given their results are correct, which is more likely). so if antimatter exists then our current model of physics will need major upgrade. it can change so much for us PLUS it will also prove that universe came into existence frm practically, Nothingness. everything that we see in universe is just 1% of the matter/antimatter that existed and disappeared.
@scottjacobable and also, our universe came into existence becuz of a ROUNDING error ie 1% matter escaped antimatter or didnt have counterpart. conclusion is, we r moving towards what many scientists have believed, existence frm nothingnes and nothingness frm existance.
Michio Kaku is a idiot. the universe is made of geometry no matter how farfetched that sounds. physicists don't use their eye ball their use their brain lobes. for them everything is a equation all based on hypothetical units of matter that only describe behavior and not an actual objects. detectors don't detect particles, they detect interference patterns peaks as quanta.big bang is for kids who have never learned about logic.
The Universe is NOT made of symmetry because celestial matter expand outwards over time, not staying the same. Who's to say that everything expand at the same rate? Physicists are scientists, and they collect data based on observation to generate theories to explain their observation. Detectors are means of collecting expected or unexpected data that are placed into charts for re-observation. They all follow the Scientific Method, anyway.
@KurogetsuOokami i didn't say there is anything wrong about the scientific method, i just say these people are very narrow minded when it comes to observations. the universe behave like garden of flowers growing in size. galaxies form circles two and two that expand in size over time. the inner circle pair become as large as the outer and more spiral arms get added as the galaxy grow older. the number of spiral arms represent what ever its a triangle square pentagon or a hexagon and so on.
@coldarc Well you certainly opposed the thinking that associated with it. These are all theories, and we do not yet have the technology in order to prove them. And as long as their not proven, why should you be going around cursing them for their "narrow-minded"-ness? They spent years analyzing and collecting data while you do what? Thinking they're wrong? BS.
@coldarc Nature can do whatever it wants, and we can't stop it anyway. Science is what we use to predict things, and it contains these puzzles that we have to solve. How can you be so sure that what you believe is true?
@KurogetsuOokami there is evidence that is in my favor in many disciplines of science. examples, karl pribram david bohm the holographic universe a alternative to the quantum model which explain quantum effects.
Kristian Birkeland the father of plasma experiments in the laboratory and space.
Wallace Thornhill and David Talbott the electric universe.
a good resource on standing wave and harmonic resonace that involve geometry and that is blaze labs research.
@coldarc Great minds think alike. These include the three big brains of astrophysics, Dr. Einstein, Dr. Hawking and Dr. Kaku. You can place your theories all you like. What you get is a simple "No" from all three of them. They wouldn't announce their findings so carelessly so that someone like you can detest it.
stan deyo anti gravity explains gravity in form of a resonant standing wave inside a cola bottle at the top of a speaker. a lorents O corkscrew smoke ring and a thermoelectric converter based on the homopolar generator that is the parallel to the standing wave field that keeps you on the ground were harmonic resonance unify gravity with electromagnetism.
@coldarc Good, now translate all that to the Queen's English. I cannot understand your terms, "stand deyo" and "a lorents O corkscrew." WTF? Your grammar is also broken. Talking to you is tough business. I know what terms you use, so don't think you can appear to be smart by bursting out vocabulary.
@KurogetsuOokami why not spend some time doing a little research on the people i mentioned. i used 10 years to get to the understanding i have now. any biased thinking will prevent you from learning about stuff you never knew existed. of course take everything with a pinch of salt.
@coldarc I have better things to do with my time, like studying on Dr. Kaku's lectures. For one, they make sense and they are logical, something you don't seem to radiate. Frankly, your ten years have drove you mad. And I'm taking your conversation bland.
@KurogetsuOokami im not mad. your wasting your life on the wrong horse with these clowns, but good luck. i hope you get lost in your own equation one day with your mensa jigsaw puzzles.
@coldarc Nah, I can see which horse is best, no need for you. I follow the trend, if these guys are proven to be hoaxes, I'll turn the other way. Society is democratic, you know.
@coldarc Claims that the most logical theory of them all is 100% wrong, the one trying to explain everything (M). Belives that 5-6 different theories are right at the same time, even tough they contradict the crap out of each other (hypocrite much). Don't know the difference between your and you're. Spendt 10 years researching.
@KurogetsuOokami filamentary currents flow between galaxies and stars and fuel them with energy trough electric forces. a stars is formed when several filamentary currents crisscross and form phase conjugating standing wave structures. what you call gravity is electricity trapped in a standing wave. smaller standing wave structures form around stars and become planets. the electrical energy that escape the electrically charged plasmoid star radiate as light microwaves x-rays and gamma rays.
@coldarc I don't need you to explain gravity to me. What you know about it makes you defy the thinking of scientists, which may differ from yours because they may have had your thinking until someone or something changed their minds. My point is that you are prematurely identifying the way science works in Dr. Kaku's mind, and if you were to sit down with him and argue using your way of thinking, there is a 500% chance he will use you to mop the floor, with both hands free to drink tea.
@KurogetsuOokami black holes are only used to explain science own creation myth, the Big Bang. it was a Atheist substitute for a belief in god. there is two things big bang cosmology and religion have in common and that is that both rely on something created out of nothing whatever trough a god or on its own, and that the universe must have a beginning. so if you don't believe in fairy tales don't believe in the Big Bang.
@coldarc So you're saying that science does not exist at all? A lot of it is influenced by cosmology and without brains like Einstein, Dr. Hawking and Dr. Kaku, we wouldn't know diarrhea shit from applesauce. So you believe this "god" can create anything out of nothing. Well, then he can hold you on this planet and another 7 billion plus over 30 billion creatures and substances and buildings from falling off the surface without gravity? Shut up and float the fuck away.
@KurogetsuOokami are you a idiot? the coin always have two sides. newton don't explain how gravity works, newton describe how gravity seem to behave. Einstein give gravity depth and allow space to be the medium for the passage of time whatever slow of fast. Einstein coin the refraction of light photons. on one side of the coin science is doing science, on the other side of the coin science is a religion. Georges Lemaître was the father of the Big Bang a Catholic priest.
@coldarc No, I'm not an idiot, I'm someone who trusts people that spend all their lives unraveling mysteries that the other 6 billion cannot do. I didn't say Newton explained how gravity works, nor did I say anything about Einstein "giving" gravity depth and "allow" space to be a medium. Just because a priest proposed a theory in science doesn't make science a religion. Science is based on fact, as in observation, not religion, it's basically something a person makes up and the world follows.
Will you idiots just shut up already about FreeMasons and all that BS? Will you use any opportunity to complain about that, just any opportunity? Get a life.
@wazfrmoz A crazy person doesn't know what is happening around them!
It is obvious you don't! He is one of them!!! If you like it or not!!! You're the type of person that will never wake up! I woke up many moons ago!! Keep on sleeping!
@SahMai hah,. dw, i had my freemason/illuminati moment, but i just happen to grow up from that, ur the type of person who doesnt accept change i guess, hah, theres a reason that people like michio are educated and people like you are stupid nutcases who like to spread bullshit because u really have nothing better to do. ITS CALLED GLOBALISATION BITCH, GET USED TO IT!
@coasterman16 string theorie's math has been one of the building blocks used by physicists at the RHIC. actually recently they collided gold ions to produce a super liquid with a temperature of 4 trillion degrees Celsius. string theory is practical.
@coasterman16 string theorie's math has been one of the building blocks used by physicists at the RHIC. actually recently they collided gold ions to produce a super liquid with a temperature of 4 trillion degrees Celsius. string theory is practical.
brookhaven national laboratory's relativistic heavy ion collider
we as humans will eventually be the end of our own civilization. For example blowing up a nuclear bomb in space. Who's idea was that? It's like dealing with children, let's just see what happens when we try this. LHC is another example. in 'theory' the black holes will disappear, but unfortunately no one really knows what will happen.
@eddysvideos33 Incorrect. Miniature black holes would have to accrete matter to destroy the world, something of which they are incapable at such tiny, almost infinitesimally small sizes. And that's without mentioning Hawking Radiation, for which there is a strong body of evidence. Seriously, do some research before you start speculating about potential catastrophes.
@SaigheadBhriste My point is it's theory till it's tested. We've effed up in the past. Do you think they knew exactly what would happen from detonating a nuclear bomb in space? It's all theory until it's actually tested.
@eddysvideos33 You're confusing the theoretical with the hypothetical. Theories are backed up by evidence from scientific methods, eg. in the case of relativity. The idea of stable miniature black holes spiralling out of control has been explored before with black holes from cosmic rays and since extraterrestrial bodies such as neutron stars have proved to be stable, we are given another reason to believe that miniature black holes pose no danger. You're worrying about hypotheses, not theories.
@SaigheadBhriste theory: A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, esp. one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. The 'big bang' is a theory. Although theory is based on some facts it's not always 100% certain. Hence the word 'Supposition' in the definition. That's why you need to test it before it becomes 'law'. (e.g. law of gravity) It's hypothesis, Model, Theory, then law. I know what im talking about.
@eddysvideos33 What evidence is there that we're wrong? Black holes produced by cosmic rays are of energies higher than anything resulting from the LHC. The continued existence of the Earth and the sun is evidence of the non-danger of said black holes - if higher energy black holes produced by interactions with cosmic rays aren't swallowing neutron stars, then ones produced at CERN aren't going to swallow the Earth. Questioning theories is pointless unless there's a good reason to doubt them.
@SaigheadBhriste Well a neutron star would be really hard to swallow considering it's billion*billion of times more dense than the earth and it's mass is bigger at pretty much the same scale. In fact, it's probably the densest thing other than a black hole itself.
@Raptorel A supermassive black hole could easily swallow a neutron star. Anything that goes inside the Schwarzschild radius is not coming out again. It's not the density that matters here, it's its proximity to the black hole.
@SaigheadBhriste Well supermassive black holes are in the centers of galaxies usually. So... you know, our star revolves around one already. You don't want to tell me that there are supermassive blackholes produced by cosmic rays do you?
@Raptorel I'd just like to point out that you've supported my argument. I claim that black holes can swallow stars, but only when they're large enough to accrete matter, for example when it's supermassive. Black holes produced by cosmic rays are not capable of doing this! If miniature black holes are not even able to accrete matter with very dense bodies, then it's certainly not going to be able to accrete matter with a much sparser body. Our disagreement is where precisely?
@SaigheadBhriste Well my point was that a neutron star has a much higher gravity than a cosmic ray miniature black hole. If anything, the black hole would be swallowed by the neutron star and not the other way around.
@Raptorel Neutron stars don't swallow black holes. While neutron stars are dense, they are nowhere near as dense as black holes and their gravitational fields are nowhere near as strong. whenever there's a winner, it's always going to be the black hole. In the case of miniature black holes, there is strong reason to believe that they dsintegrate via Hawking radiation.
@SaigheadBhriste It doesn't make any sense... I mean, I understand a black hole is collapsed onto itself but still, that's a MINIATURE black hole, microscopical, while a neutron star is the closest thing in terms of gravity to a black hole and it's supposed to have a much higher gravity than a microscopic black hole.
@Raptorel It's determined by its gravitational field at the surface. If the black hole is big enough to accrete matter, it will swallow anything that does not exceed its escape velocity at that distance. Otherwise, it "evaporates". Either way it is irrelevant, because neutron stars continue to be stable in the face of such miniature black holes.
Sparticles is a michio definition of something that cant be proved to exist.
Amd it might exist, if there is one person i would trust in his findings its michio,
but just because he says "sparticles" doesnt mean you have to say the same.
Its all related to the same subject that has the sign "questionmark" to all its questions. So We'll examine how things are the moment we can all get to orbit.
Qft is shit that goes above my head. But how his quantum gravity related to the gravitational effect of black holes on the universe? Just like "sparticles" dont exist, neither do tiny black holes. I am aware that these holes are unstable.
This video DEFINTINTLY reminds me of two songs (Song:The Plan by K-Rino) "the earthquake in Hati, hell HAARP might of did it" by K-Rino
and (Song:Ground Zero by Lil Wayne) "It ain't no hurricane it ain't no flood THIS is some other sh** that we ain't know of" by Lil wayne if you study Numerology you can also check out that Adolf Hitler=(11) which is a master number and also FOX=666. Bless this (Song:The Serpent by K-Rino 3:01-3:30)
There is no such thing as tiny black holes. The mass for an old STAR to collapse and form a black hole is more than 3 times the mass of the Sun, so a lot of people have to go back to school.
Ofcourse theres something as tiny black holes. Maybe you should do some education.
Micro black holes are thought to be spawn and die within the space fabric.
The minimal mass of a black hole is calculated trough the planck mass. The kinetic energy that powers a black hole in existance is equal to a electronvolt.
If both the planck mass and the kinetic energy equivalent of 1 electronvolt are pressurized within the schwarzschild radius (schwarzschild radius means
pressurizing mass (earth) to a radius at which the gravitational constant equals the speed of light causing a event horizon which makes it a black hole in the first place.
So there are tiny black holes. Its just that they mostly do not form naturally. It probably happened alot at the beginning of the solar system. Gamma ray bursts, galactic collisions, and the existance of antimatter could possible still create the funds to create a dozen of undiscovered tiny holes.
@Armigo91 Even if the energy density of a qgp were of the order of a black hole or even higher, that would not be a tiny black hole. It would be at most, 'ionized' space time or the extra dimensions that are actually being sought, for super symmetry evidences. Remember sparticles?
@jci10 If you studied science and phsysics, you would be aware of the fact that we only clarify a substance that we don't understand as dark matter. Scientists still don't know exactly what it is or sure-fire ways to experiment with it. Sorry, but we are still a very young civilization and cannot claim to know everything about the universe when we haven't even been able to travel outside of our own galaxy yet or closely examine other galaxies and their planets.
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH,,,
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH,,,
For strangelets to pose a hazard at a HIC, four conditions would
have to be met. Strangelets would have to be stable in bulk at zero external pressure. If strangelets is not stable, it wont form spontaneously.
Strangelets would have to be at least metastable for very small atomic mass, for
only very small strangelets can conceivably be created in HIC. It must be possible to produce such a small, metastable strangelet in a HIC. The stable composition of a strangelet MUST be negatively charged.
"We don't understand what 96% of the Universe is made of". Someone should talk to Michio about Dark Energy and Dark Matter. He seems fairly ignorant on this matter.
@jci10 We don't know anything about the nature of dark energy and dark matter, they've just been given those names because calculations indicate that they must be there, but they aren't measured in normal matter and energy.
yes kelvin we r still here but for how long the events of this year eg floods australia, quake NZ, Quake Tsunami Japan could b an indication of the beginning of strangelet phenominum taking place the process of anti-matter obsorbing matter can take several yrs to eventuate but will gain momentum as it grows
this research will create particles strangelets these strangelets will create a unparalleled amount of gravitational energy sink to the centre of earth & start to digest the planet creating a "blackhole" the blackhole will then distablise the Earth triggering a number of sizemic events eg Japan quake notice whirlpools in the Sea after Tsumami off Japan evidence of magnetic disturbance beneath the Earths crust finally Earth inself will implode into this phenominum genesis is not for mankind
@kelvinjanssen95 these kooks r playing with forces beyond our understanding its one thing to experiment with the forces of earthly physics but go beyond to the forces that created the universe and not fully understand the science is crazy they dont understand what they are playing with we are talking about forces that destroy stars 1000s of times the size of Earth universal science far beyond the human IQ
10 billion euro's??? how about using it to end world hunger? neh? shrimate! hmmm.. anyway there is still a percentage of it making the machine unstable. now that earthquake are frequent in the world.
10 billion euro's??? how about using it to end world hunger? neh? shrimate! hmmm.. anyway there is still a percentage of it making the machine unstable. now that earthquake are frequent in the world.
@emorocker168 the only way to end world hunger is not to spend 10billion $, but to end the fed , kill off imf, ecb. bankrupt the banks. free us from debt.
Michio Kaku not only makes complex topics accessible to the layman, he makes them remarkably interesting. I dream to be half as smart as that man.Thanks to Kaku I plan on going for a degree in physics. You f'n rock Michio!
@mrpion33r well I'm not the one who is gonna bring you the news but just to say that I'm interested too xD if you find anything let me know and so will I :)
heh, but are these particles that hit earch, mini black holes? NO they are not. So isn't the concept of a black hole that it keeps sucking in everything around it? so it will take 20 years, but it will suck in everything!!! OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
Through the relativity theory of Einstein of over one century, it hold with strength - as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. From relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now 2011, the disciples of to Einstein, preach with contumely, as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.
@IIZODIIAC Yup, he's one of the most intelligent and interesting people in the world. I would love to have a personal conversation with him, and maybe he could have my babies <3 lol jk I'm not gay, but I do have a lot of respect for him :)
@IIZODIIAC you bet I love Michio Kaku. He is a genuine thinker. Einstein said "Imagination is more important than knowledge". After all, a mind is not a vessel to be *filled* but rather, a fire to be *kindled*
THESE! ARE! SPARTICLES!
fattybergeson 2 days ago
im not sure what demention u live in..lo
ZzZEeESsSTtTYyY 1 week ago
and the mistake is the way that leaves no trace information when you move.
its a buby hipotecis.
dgslayer08 1 week ago
perhaps the information is a being from another dimecion.
dgslayer08 1 week ago
pls i wana know how other dimetions affect the fisics law and what about other universe?
is other univerce mean other dimentions? and if other univerce have other fisic law and it can not conclude to the same next dimention is it posible?
dgslayer08 1 week ago
Michio Kaku breaking it down like a boss.
chickenpotpie84 2 weeks ago
@youme1414 okay =P
AlexDiavolo1 2 weeks ago
Listen to Bob Lazar's account of how they tested an alien craft 'gravity amplifiers' and how they focused it into a 'small black dot' and made tests with it.
He was discredited and debunked by scientists more than 20 years ago when he said gravity have two types that acts on an atomic level and the normal kind and propagates as a wave, but now physicists all agree that this is true.
stiffyschlong 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The dust of subatomic particles resulted after the collisions in LHC are particles of ethereal matter, even that the physicists give not them permission of existence! The electrical discharge to one Tesla coil was made and in a basin with water. Great was the surprise that the electrical discharge of the particles of electrical ether in water has the same ARBORESCENT SHAPE - proving the existence, and in water of the primary ethereal gravitational field.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
From 1967 I analyse with attention all published experiments concerning the accelerators of particles and the controlled thermonuclear fusion, moreover and the scriptural and paleoastronautical information. I had made only a logical and rational synthesis of the applied science, therefore my brothers- you block not the your sites and my computer. Please you to support me, how long, I still can produce such information.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Now, were collided particles in LHC and you seen that is nothimg: none Higgs boson, none Big-Bang, neither black holes, but only thousands of shards of ethereal particles.Therefore, now -return you physicists from your distraction at Isaac Newton with his universal attraction law= THE UNIFIED LAW OF THE MATTERS AND FORCES, at the eliminated ETHER by Einstein, at the unseen world of the ethereal and spiritual matters which fill up the Cosmos, and return you at the Lord- at God!
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The physicists show that about the discovery the Higgs boson it desire and the discovery the origins of the bodies'mass; the discovery the dark matter, the discovery the superior dimensions and the demonstration of the superposition. But as a result to the collisions of particles- the black holes had appeared not, the Big-Bang had appeared not demonstrating that the Large Hadron Collider bring not about us the Apocalipse.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
It say: with the exception of the Higgs boson all the predicted particles of Standard Model were detected and the them properties were measured with precision. The Standard Model of particles to arrived let be verified, but, if the Higgs boson is not finded, then the Standard Model and the others models will be necessary to be reconstruct from zero.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
In 1964 physicist Peter Higgs has thinked existence to one energetic field which penetrate whole Universe, and named it "Higgs field" and his particles named "Higgs boson"and that these can give mass the subatomic particles.Thus appear the necessity as in the CERN-frame let it construct an accelerator more big: the LARGE HADRON COLLIDER,which made the first collisions of particles in 14 December 2009, afterwards in 2010, in 2011 and they uncovered not the Higgs boson particles
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The movement of the celestial bodies in Cosmos demonstrates that these it can not maintain in the existent formation if not would exist and another matter which let complete and fill up the Cosmos. And this unknown matter, which is the eliminated ETHER- they named she: dark matter and dark energy, which is in proportion of 96% from the Cosmos's mass.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Already the protons, neutrons and electrons are formed through condensation and concentration of the etehreal particles. But how the ETHER has eliminated from physics, the physicists had invented the Standard Model of the particles and them forces excluding the gravity. Thus for to comprise and the gravity with her particles and forces they had invented and the strings theory.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The materials seem to be complicated and irregular at the sight with the free eye. But at microscope they it show simple and orderly. All the material shapes: animal. vegetal and mineral are made from atoms and these only from three constituents: protons, neutrons and electrons. The photon of light we see it and the photon of heat we feel it, but the ethereal particles are more small, of a few thousands time; we see not them now, but the our spirits see them.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
If in 1905 Einstein excludes the ETHER from physics, viz excludes the intergalactic matter, then the his disciples arrive with the relativity theory at Big-Bang, at black holes, holes of worm, at singularity and today at travel in time. Thus the great explosion of George Gamov and his fellows R.A.Ipher and R.C.Hermann, become cosmological standardized theory which is one great bluff!
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Between 1930...1935 the discord was photon of light.The opinion of physicists had not adopted existence in flight to photon, and photon remain without mass. If photon has not mass, he cannot interact with nothing on trajectory and the light speed remain constant lengthways the trajectory. Thus, in place let to consider that the photons lose themselves the speed on way as result the them interaction with the intergalactic matter, they had set the Universe let it dilate entirely
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Today in front of our eyes and of the observation apparatuses it succedes all evolution phases of the celestial bodies, stars and galaxies. An evidence that the Universe doesn't seems to have an explosive beginning and doesn't seems to have ever an end in the his entirely. The facts demonstrates that in Universe the cyclical creation has place continuously in certain parts, and can has not place total creation in the same time in all the mass of the Universe.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
As early as the time of Michael Faraday at scientific problems in contradiction, academical circles decided victory the some or another.In this optics of domination of certain conceptions: philosophical, theological and of other principles, in science had penetrated mistaken and fallacious theories, and the impossibility of immediate verification, to leaded at the creation others abstractings which had blocked the road of the scientific innovation with practical applications.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Today, on measure that the theory advances from classic mechanics to the quantum mechanics the particle and the wave are gradual dematerialize. The modern physics is blocked by enunciation of some laws and mistaken principles as: relativity theory, Hubble's law, postulation that the atom can't emit and absorb radiations continously, admitting the postulate what claims the photons without mass a.s.o. These guide- us at supernatural and at the technical and technological blocage
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Nikola Tesla argued that:" I hold that the space cannot be curved, for the simple reason that it can has not properties. Of properties it can speak only when it work with the matter which fill up the space. The empty space it can not curve because- something- can not action about -nothing". This relativity proceed from a philosophical direction, on which A.Einstein produce her when he was found in a state of technical and religious confusion.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• Sand ustanBrasov
Einstein ignore and vex over 100 of men of science which had signed a petition in which they upholded that the his relativity theory is wrongly. It renounce at the absolute space and absolute time, it arrive at the Lorentz-Einstein's transformations through the introduction to two factors- subunitary and superunitary what lead at the infinte mass phantoms, at the infinte energy phantoms and at the infinte impuls phantoms when a body or particle would touch the light speed.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
As a result of the wrong interpretation of the Michelsom-Morley(1881)'s experiments which had demonstrated that the ETHER is entirely trained with the mass and the Earth's atmosphere, in 1905 A.Einstein renounced at the ether notion, at absolute space and set the relativist mecanics' base. He emits the two restricted relativity principles through which excludes the Ether, impose as limit of bodies' movement -the light speed and denatured completely the classic dynamics reality
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
Thus, the primary gravitational field it manifest as a solid body for the electrical ether and the electromagnetic phenomenons, and in the same time it manifest as a fluid body for the ethereal concentrated bodies and for the chemical bodies. We perceive the secondary gravitational field among the astral bodies. and in the electrical unloading's case which are ARBORESCENT we perceive and the primary gravitational field of the primary electrogenic particles.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
But celestial sources say us that whole Cosmos is filled with a dense powder of alive ethereal and electrogenic particles, and among they are streams of particles and more small because gravitational primary attraction among they, constituting primary gravitational field.But more exist,in the same space and secundary gravitational field produced by the ethereal concentrated particles in the ethereal bodies and in the chemical bodies which are neutral from electrical viewpoint.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
With much before Einstein, J.C.Maxwell starts from a mental experience, says that he generalize the Faraday's Electric Induction law and exclaims that the transmited wave would be a successive creation of magnetic fields and electric fields perpendicular between them and on the propagation direction. Since then it preachs the transmission of the electromagnetic wave at thousands kilometres without material suport.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
Leibnitz(1646...1716) German scientist, forerunner of the mathematical logic, through the denial the newtonian space- time is and he a forerunner of the Einstein's relativity. Einstein considers the gravity as a property of the space and not in the least as a property of the matter which fill up this space. The Einstein's relativity is a geometrization of the space.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
In the century XIX, the new scholars: Coulomb, Laplace, Ampere, Poisson, Green, Gauss, Webwer etc., had holded the action's theory at distance without material support, and they support only the mathematical abstracted theories. The science already started let it cover more much with the theory than with the practice.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
The theory without logic and reason is and remain an non-reality.The science is at beginning a theory, but has logic and reason and become true after the her practical realisation.The space it stretch in Infinite and the time come from Infinite and it stretch in Infinite marking the reality of the ours material world seen and unseen.The faithless man believe not that exist the God with the our world seen and unseen and then this man can not think and judge with real elements.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
• SandustanBrasov
A.Einstein through the his relativity to REVERSED the reality of the our terresterial world. He remove the ETHER from physics and give materiality the space and the time. But the SPACE limit the place where it can unfolding material actions and the TIME mark the period of unfolding to some material actions. The space and the time are only ABSTRACT notions, absolute and colateral which show where and when it unfolding certain material actions.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theorist physicist omit to study the science's history as let understand the things and phenomenons, but they learn only the exposed theory for to obtain a diploma, afterwards they twitter. We must let understand the science and how it was builded. Einstein has and good parts, but those mistaken are catastrophic. But Einstein was not single in the supporting the mistakes.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The theoretical mistakes from centuries XIX and XX, had been amplified and had passed noisily in century XXI. Many experiments and terrestrial and extraterrestrial observations was wrongly interpreted because theoretical physics indoctrinated with Einstein's relativity.Thus was started the investigation of subatomic particles without ethereal matters and was started the building of the ITER without to know the electrical ether and his role in the working of the magnetic trap
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
SandustanBrasov
The heavenly embodied world together with the heavenly unembodied world or free spirits- they had created and spreated- us on all the Earth surface, they had mixed- us and raised ones against another; they created us at a certain moment certain problems on which we must solve for can exist as terrestrial embodied beings, for gain our experience and our world personality.
sandustanBrasov 1 month ago
I have a feeling where all gonna die!!!!
SLIMIIN3GII 1 month ago
@SLIMIIN3GII he said the black hole is the size of a proton. that can not even suck in sound.
wkdw1ll1ams 1 month ago
Why don't we have a guy like Michio Kaku as president? lol
AlexDiavolo1 1 month ago
@AlexDiavolo1 Have him as your president. He can't be mine!
youme1414 2 weeks ago
This Doc :)) is damn right, I allways thought we understand so little of physics cose we are using only 4 dimensions. Using only what we can see with our today senses , and creating math formulas with only 4 dimension is the thing that keeps us down.
qpae123 1 month ago
I allways love Physics ..But i allways hated math. I believe we make huge mistakes using math to be able to describe physics. We should be able to comunicate our knoledge to each other without using math limitations. I bet human brains can conected ''wireless " and create super networks :)) without loosing all time and and loosing data using math as '' encrytion'':))
qpae123 1 month ago
@qpae123 ''encryption':))
qpae123 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Michio Kaku > Jesus Christ
luisr12491 1 month ago
1:11 SPARTA-cles ^_^
tijuanamarisol666 2 months ago
what happened in CERN a few weeks ago????
scottjacobable 2 months ago
@scottjacobable they have found something that behaves different to matter, so assumption of existence of antimatter seems to be true ( given their results are correct, which is more likely). so if antimatter exists then our current model of physics will need major upgrade. it can change so much for us PLUS it will also prove that universe came into existence frm practically, Nothingness. everything that we see in universe is just 1% of the matter/antimatter that existed and disappeared.
chinamanspeakenlis 2 months ago
@scottjacobable and also, our universe came into existence becuz of a ROUNDING error ie 1% matter escaped antimatter or didnt have counterpart. conclusion is, we r moving towards what many scientists have believed, existence frm nothingnes and nothingness frm existance.
chinamanspeakenlis 2 months ago
@chinamanspeakenlis closing the circle.
chinamanspeakenlis 2 months ago
Haha we should start calling it the puny large hadron collider
GotZest 2 months ago
This is actually interesting, especially after what happened at CERN a few weeks ago.
Hmmm..
darkmatter462 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
If you love light sci-fi and science articles then please visit my blog at amillionmonkeys.blog.com and please subscribe for free.
ShangoRaiden 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
These videos are so fascinating, they make me wanna become a physician!
Keep up the good job Sir! :D
MrCiaMan123 3 months ago
Comment removed
MrCiaMan123 3 months ago
A black hole eating the entire studio all of a sudden at 0:46 would have been perfect comic timing (I'm not being sarcastic)
Adrian22Frets 5 months ago
puny large hadron collider lol.
PiPhiC 5 months ago
Michio Kaku is a idiot. the universe is made of geometry no matter how farfetched that sounds. physicists don't use their eye ball their use their brain lobes. for them everything is a equation all based on hypothetical units of matter that only describe behavior and not an actual objects. detectors don't detect particles, they detect interference patterns peaks as quanta.big bang is for kids who have never learned about logic.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc You're wrong. Unequivocally wrong.
The Universe is NOT made of symmetry because celestial matter expand outwards over time, not staying the same. Who's to say that everything expand at the same rate? Physicists are scientists, and they collect data based on observation to generate theories to explain their observation. Detectors are means of collecting expected or unexpected data that are placed into charts for re-observation. They all follow the Scientific Method, anyway.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami i didn't say there is anything wrong about the scientific method, i just say these people are very narrow minded when it comes to observations. the universe behave like garden of flowers growing in size. galaxies form circles two and two that expand in size over time. the inner circle pair become as large as the outer and more spiral arms get added as the galaxy grow older. the number of spiral arms represent what ever its a triangle square pentagon or a hexagon and so on.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc Well you certainly opposed the thinking that associated with it. These are all theories, and we do not yet have the technology in order to prove them. And as long as their not proven, why should you be going around cursing them for their "narrow-minded"-ness? They spent years analyzing and collecting data while you do what? Thinking they're wrong? BS.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami i don't think your fully understand what i am saying. there is no mysteries, only fallaciously science.
the inner workings of the universe is not hidden from us. separateness is deceiving.
particles are separate objects. nature already violate that reality.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc Nature can do whatever it wants, and we can't stop it anyway. Science is what we use to predict things, and it contains these puzzles that we have to solve. How can you be so sure that what you believe is true?
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami there is evidence that is in my favor in many disciplines of science. examples, karl pribram david bohm the holographic universe a alternative to the quantum model which explain quantum effects.
Kristian Birkeland the father of plasma experiments in the laboratory and space.
Wallace Thornhill and David Talbott the electric universe.
a good resource on standing wave and harmonic resonace that involve geometry and that is blaze labs research.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc Great minds think alike. These include the three big brains of astrophysics, Dr. Einstein, Dr. Hawking and Dr. Kaku. You can place your theories all you like. What you get is a simple "No" from all three of them. They wouldn't announce their findings so carelessly so that someone like you can detest it.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami
stan deyo anti gravity explains gravity in form of a resonant standing wave inside a cola bottle at the top of a speaker. a lorents O corkscrew smoke ring and a thermoelectric converter based on the homopolar generator that is the parallel to the standing wave field that keeps you on the ground were harmonic resonance unify gravity with electromagnetism.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc Good, now translate all that to the Queen's English. I cannot understand your terms, "stand deyo" and "a lorents O corkscrew." WTF? Your grammar is also broken. Talking to you is tough business. I know what terms you use, so don't think you can appear to be smart by bursting out vocabulary.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami why not spend some time doing a little research on the people i mentioned. i used 10 years to get to the understanding i have now. any biased thinking will prevent you from learning about stuff you never knew existed. of course take everything with a pinch of salt.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc I have better things to do with my time, like studying on Dr. Kaku's lectures. For one, they make sense and they are logical, something you don't seem to radiate. Frankly, your ten years have drove you mad. And I'm taking your conversation bland.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami im not mad. your wasting your life on the wrong horse with these clowns, but good luck. i hope you get lost in your own equation one day with your mensa jigsaw puzzles.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc Nah, I can see which horse is best, no need for you. I follow the trend, if these guys are proven to be hoaxes, I'll turn the other way. Society is democratic, you know.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@coldarc Claims that the most logical theory of them all is 100% wrong, the one trying to explain everything (M). Belives that 5-6 different theories are right at the same time, even tough they contradict the crap out of each other (hypocrite much). Don't know the difference between your and you're. Spendt 10 years researching.
YEAH. You did not waste your time.
By the way, yes umad.
Berzerkant 4 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami filamentary currents flow between galaxies and stars and fuel them with energy trough electric forces. a stars is formed when several filamentary currents crisscross and form phase conjugating standing wave structures. what you call gravity is electricity trapped in a standing wave. smaller standing wave structures form around stars and become planets. the electrical energy that escape the electrically charged plasmoid star radiate as light microwaves x-rays and gamma rays.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc I don't need you to explain gravity to me. What you know about it makes you defy the thinking of scientists, which may differ from yours because they may have had your thinking until someone or something changed their minds. My point is that you are prematurely identifying the way science works in Dr. Kaku's mind, and if you were to sit down with him and argue using your way of thinking, there is a 500% chance he will use you to mop the floor, with both hands free to drink tea.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami black holes are only used to explain science own creation myth, the Big Bang. it was a Atheist substitute for a belief in god. there is two things big bang cosmology and religion have in common and that is that both rely on something created out of nothing whatever trough a god or on its own, and that the universe must have a beginning. so if you don't believe in fairy tales don't believe in the Big Bang.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc So you're saying that science does not exist at all? A lot of it is influenced by cosmology and without brains like Einstein, Dr. Hawking and Dr. Kaku, we wouldn't know diarrhea shit from applesauce. So you believe this "god" can create anything out of nothing. Well, then he can hold you on this planet and another 7 billion plus over 30 billion creatures and substances and buildings from falling off the surface without gravity? Shut up and float the fuck away.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami are you a idiot? the coin always have two sides. newton don't explain how gravity works, newton describe how gravity seem to behave. Einstein give gravity depth and allow space to be the medium for the passage of time whatever slow of fast. Einstein coin the refraction of light photons. on one side of the coin science is doing science, on the other side of the coin science is a religion. Georges Lemaître was the father of the Big Bang a Catholic priest.
coldarc 5 months ago
@coldarc No, I'm not an idiot, I'm someone who trusts people that spend all their lives unraveling mysteries that the other 6 billion cannot do. I didn't say Newton explained how gravity works, nor did I say anything about Einstein "giving" gravity depth and "allow" space to be a medium. Just because a priest proposed a theory in science doesn't make science a religion. Science is based on fact, as in observation, not religion, it's basically something a person makes up and the world follows.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
Dr. Kaku refers to the sparticles as the "Higgs boson" otherwise known as the "God particle."
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokami
He refers to sparticles as the hypothetical super-symetrical particles (google Supersymmetry for info).
One other potential discovery the LHC may make or falsify.
ytmoog 5 months ago
@ytmoog No, I meant what Dr. Kaku said about the "Higgs boson" when retelling the story, and stated about God and stuff.
KurogetsuOokami 5 months ago
@KurogetsuOokam
Not sure what you mean then, supersymmetry seems unrelated to that story.
ytmoog 5 months ago
that guy is like what the fuck he talking about
MegaKillerpoo 5 months ago
Are you a god ?
no
then....die!
Ray, when someone asks you if you're a god, you say "YES!"
wkumatchstick 6 months ago
do this sparticles only battle in armies of 300? thumbs up if you get it
yohance 6 months ago
0:57 laugh of relief
bambamboom2 6 months ago
i could sit here for hours just listening to michio talk
dripdropdrippin 7 months ago
THIS IS SPARTICLES !!! *turns on puny large hadron collider*
AFIDD21 7 months ago 2
Michio works for Nasa, wake up all!! he is a freemason!! People that work for Nasa are
all freemasons. Research this!
SahMai 7 months ago
@SahMai
Will you idiots just shut up already about FreeMasons and all that BS? Will you use any opportunity to complain about that, just any opportunity? Get a life.
Illumirage 6 months ago
@Illumirage you need to wake up! You don't know what is happening around you!
you're still asleep! A life you should try and get! or are you a freemason at the bottom of the list?
SahMai 1 month ago
@SahMai
That little rant of yours was, cute...
Funny, you're telling me a lot about me, for having never met me and all.
Are you off your meds or something?
Illumirage 1 month ago
@SahMai hah, ur crazy u do know that
wazfrmoz 2 months ago
@wazfrmoz A crazy person doesn't know what is happening around them!
It is obvious you don't! He is one of them!!! If you like it or not!!! You're the type of person that will never wake up! I woke up many moons ago!! Keep on sleeping!
SahMai 1 month ago
@SahMai hah,. dw, i had my freemason/illuminati moment, but i just happen to grow up from that, ur the type of person who doesnt accept change i guess, hah, theres a reason that people like michio are educated and people like you are stupid nutcases who like to spread bullshit because u really have nothing better to do. ITS CALLED GLOBALISATION BITCH, GET USED TO IT!
wazfrmoz 1 month ago
@SahMai Einstein defined craziness as doing the same thing over and over again, and hoping for different results. Stop trying, go away.
aKxKarmaX 1 month ago
Uh oh...String theorists.
coasterman16 7 months ago
@coasterman16 string theorie's math has been one of the building blocks used by physicists at the RHIC. actually recently they collided gold ions to produce a super liquid with a temperature of 4 trillion degrees Celsius. string theory is practical.
ItsNotEvenSunny 7 months ago
@coasterman16 string theorie's math has been one of the building blocks used by physicists at the RHIC. actually recently they collided gold ions to produce a super liquid with a temperature of 4 trillion degrees Celsius. string theory is practical.
brookhaven national laboratory's relativistic heavy ion collider
ItsNotEvenSunny 7 months ago
They need to harness the energy of a star to detect the missing energy from the collision which would detect these extra dimensions of space!
FallofDarkness55 7 months ago
Thumbs up if you wanna slap this stupid arab guy across his face!!
yvan2505 7 months ago
we as humans will eventually be the end of our own civilization. For example blowing up a nuclear bomb in space. Who's idea was that? It's like dealing with children, let's just see what happens when we try this. LHC is another example. in 'theory' the black holes will disappear, but unfortunately no one really knows what will happen.
eddysvideos33 8 months ago
@eddysvideos33 Incorrect. Miniature black holes would have to accrete matter to destroy the world, something of which they are incapable at such tiny, almost infinitesimally small sizes. And that's without mentioning Hawking Radiation, for which there is a strong body of evidence. Seriously, do some research before you start speculating about potential catastrophes.
SaigheadBhriste 7 months ago
@SaigheadBhriste My point is it's theory till it's tested. We've effed up in the past. Do you think they knew exactly what would happen from detonating a nuclear bomb in space? It's all theory until it's actually tested.
eddysvideos33 7 months ago
@eddysvideos33 You're confusing the theoretical with the hypothetical. Theories are backed up by evidence from scientific methods, eg. in the case of relativity. The idea of stable miniature black holes spiralling out of control has been explored before with black holes from cosmic rays and since extraterrestrial bodies such as neutron stars have proved to be stable, we are given another reason to believe that miniature black holes pose no danger. You're worrying about hypotheses, not theories.
SaigheadBhriste 7 months ago
@SaigheadBhriste theory: A supposition or a system of ideas intended to explain something, esp. one based on general principles independent of the thing to be explained. The 'big bang' is a theory. Although theory is based on some facts it's not always 100% certain. Hence the word 'Supposition' in the definition. That's why you need to test it before it becomes 'law'. (e.g. law of gravity) It's hypothesis, Model, Theory, then law. I know what im talking about.
eddysvideos33 7 months ago
@eddysvideos33 What evidence is there that we're wrong? Black holes produced by cosmic rays are of energies higher than anything resulting from the LHC. The continued existence of the Earth and the sun is evidence of the non-danger of said black holes - if higher energy black holes produced by interactions with cosmic rays aren't swallowing neutron stars, then ones produced at CERN aren't going to swallow the Earth. Questioning theories is pointless unless there's a good reason to doubt them.
SaigheadBhriste 7 months ago
@SaigheadBhriste Well a neutron star would be really hard to swallow considering it's billion*billion of times more dense than the earth and it's mass is bigger at pretty much the same scale. In fact, it's probably the densest thing other than a black hole itself.
Raptorel 7 months ago
@Raptorel A supermassive black hole could easily swallow a neutron star. Anything that goes inside the Schwarzschild radius is not coming out again. It's not the density that matters here, it's its proximity to the black hole.
SaigheadBhriste 7 months ago
@SaigheadBhriste Well supermassive black holes are in the centers of galaxies usually. So... you know, our star revolves around one already. You don't want to tell me that there are supermassive blackholes produced by cosmic rays do you?
Raptorel 7 months ago
@Raptorel I'd just like to point out that you've supported my argument. I claim that black holes can swallow stars, but only when they're large enough to accrete matter, for example when it's supermassive. Black holes produced by cosmic rays are not capable of doing this! If miniature black holes are not even able to accrete matter with very dense bodies, then it's certainly not going to be able to accrete matter with a much sparser body. Our disagreement is where precisely?
SaigheadBhriste 7 months ago
@SaigheadBhriste Well my point was that a neutron star has a much higher gravity than a cosmic ray miniature black hole. If anything, the black hole would be swallowed by the neutron star and not the other way around.
Raptorel 7 months ago
@Raptorel Neutron stars don't swallow black holes. While neutron stars are dense, they are nowhere near as dense as black holes and their gravitational fields are nowhere near as strong. whenever there's a winner, it's always going to be the black hole. In the case of miniature black holes, there is strong reason to believe that they dsintegrate via Hawking radiation.
SaigheadBhriste 7 months ago
@SaigheadBhriste It doesn't make any sense... I mean, I understand a black hole is collapsed onto itself but still, that's a MINIATURE black hole, microscopical, while a neutron star is the closest thing in terms of gravity to a black hole and it's supposed to have a much higher gravity than a microscopic black hole.
Raptorel 7 months ago
@Raptorel It's determined by its gravitational field at the surface. If the black hole is big enough to accrete matter, it will swallow anything that does not exceed its escape velocity at that distance. Otherwise, it "evaporates". Either way it is irrelevant, because neutron stars continue to be stable in the face of such miniature black holes.
SaigheadBhriste 7 months ago
Sparticles is a michio definition of something that cant be proved to exist.
Amd it might exist, if there is one person i would trust in his findings its michio,
but just because he says "sparticles" doesnt mean you have to say the same.
Its all related to the same subject that has the sign "questionmark" to all its questions. So We'll examine how things are the moment we can all get to orbit.
Armigo91 8 months ago
Qft is shit that goes above my head. But how his quantum gravity related to the gravitational effect of black holes on the universe? Just like "sparticles" dont exist, neither do tiny black holes. I am aware that these holes are unstable.
And that a black hole either eats or dies.
I wouldnt call it a ionized quark soup however.
Armigo91 8 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This video DEFINTINTLY reminds me of two songs (Song:The Plan by K-Rino) "the earthquake in Hati, hell HAARP might of did it" by K-Rino
and (Song:Ground Zero by Lil Wayne) "It ain't no hurricane it ain't no flood THIS is some other sh** that we ain't know of" by Lil wayne if you study Numerology you can also check out that Adolf Hitler=(11) which is a master number and also FOX=666. Bless this (Song:The Serpent by K-Rino 3:01-3:30)
KSATica 8 months ago
I ment at the beginning of the universe:p
Armigo91 8 months ago
There is no such thing as tiny black holes. The mass for an old STAR to collapse and form a black hole is more than 3 times the mass of the Sun, so a lot of people have to go back to school.
wizardofmadness 8 months ago
@wizardofmadness
Ofcourse theres something as tiny black holes. Maybe you should do some education.
Micro black holes are thought to be spawn and die within the space fabric.
The minimal mass of a black hole is calculated trough the planck mass. The kinetic energy that powers a black hole in existance is equal to a electronvolt.
If both the planck mass and the kinetic energy equivalent of 1 electronvolt are pressurized within the schwarzschild radius (schwarzschild radius means
Armigo91 8 months ago
@Armigo91 You're just thinking of geometry. If it were true at the qft level, quantum gravity would be trivial.
wizardofmadness 8 months ago
@wizardofmadness
pressurizing mass (earth) to a radius at which the gravitational constant equals the speed of light causing a event horizon which makes it a black hole in the first place.
So there are tiny black holes. Its just that they mostly do not form naturally. It probably happened alot at the beginning of the solar system. Gamma ray bursts, galactic collisions, and the existance of antimatter could possible still create the funds to create a dozen of undiscovered tiny holes.
Armigo91 8 months ago
@Armigo91 Even if the energy density of a qgp were of the order of a black hole or even higher, that would not be a tiny black hole. It would be at most, 'ionized' space time or the extra dimensions that are actually being sought, for super symmetry evidences. Remember sparticles?
wizardofmadness 8 months ago
Ummm..umm..hmmmm....HIGGS BOSON
CCTV9 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Best BBW women dating site only for you naneedj.info
marisoldickson 9 months ago
@jci10 If you studied science and phsysics, you would be aware of the fact that we only clarify a substance that we don't understand as dark matter. Scientists still don't know exactly what it is or sure-fire ways to experiment with it. Sorry, but we are still a very young civilization and cannot claim to know everything about the universe when we haven't even been able to travel outside of our own galaxy yet or closely examine other galaxies and their planets.
lostsurfc0 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH,,,
frenkyusuf 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
heyyy allof mankind,, everybady,,, we came to end,, that was the light,,, with that light we are going TO be createar, we are going to be destoreyer and we are going to be maker,, our GOD, wont give that chance to us,,, l mean it, l m not kiding even joke or even fun,,, everbady will be their own MESSIAHH,,,
frenkyusuf 9 months ago
MADNESS? THIS IS SPARTICLE!
LAGG3R 9 months ago
Its the genesis wave..........its on a buildup to detonation. Mr. Scott ....we need warp speed in 3 minutes or we're all dead!!!!!!!
MrStonewallj 9 months ago
For strangelets to pose a hazard at a HIC, four conditions would
have to be met. Strangelets would have to be stable in bulk at zero external pressure. If strangelets is not stable, it wont form spontaneously.
Strangelets would have to be at least metastable for very small atomic mass, for
only very small strangelets can conceivably be created in HIC. It must be possible to produce such a small, metastable strangelet in a HIC. The stable composition of a strangelet MUST be negatively charged.
tapu32 9 months ago
"We don't understand what 96% of the Universe is made of". Someone should talk to Michio about Dark Energy and Dark Matter. He seems fairly ignorant on this matter.
jci10 9 months ago
@jci10 dark matter and etc is just a cover name of something we have no idea what it is lol
AgrivatedKillah 9 months ago
@jci10 We don't know anything about the nature of dark energy and dark matter, they've just been given those names because calculations indicate that they must be there, but they aren't measured in normal matter and energy.
BlackSunSerenade 9 months ago
Whats up with all the physicist with the same Einstein hair doo?
Voss2120 9 months ago
yes kelvin we r still here but for how long the events of this year eg floods australia, quake NZ, Quake Tsunami Japan could b an indication of the beginning of strangelet phenominum taking place the process of anti-matter obsorbing matter can take several yrs to eventuate but will gain momentum as it grows
suparocstar 9 months ago
this research will create particles strangelets these strangelets will create a unparalleled amount of gravitational energy sink to the centre of earth & start to digest the planet creating a "blackhole" the blackhole will then distablise the Earth triggering a number of sizemic events eg Japan quake notice whirlpools in the Sea after Tsumami off Japan evidence of magnetic disturbance beneath the Earths crust finally Earth inself will implode into this phenominum genesis is not for mankind
suparocstar 9 months ago
@suparocstar well, they have the LHC active for a long time already, as far as I know, we arent in a black hole...
kelvinjanssen95 9 months ago
@kelvinjanssen95 these kooks r playing with forces beyond our understanding its one thing to experiment with the forces of earthly physics but go beyond to the forces that created the universe and not fully understand the science is crazy they dont understand what they are playing with we are talking about forces that destroy stars 1000s of times the size of Earth universal science far beyond the human IQ
suparocstar 9 months ago
If only Michio Kaku was there when they ask that question. He would have saved the day and have that God damn machine built (no pun intended).
VersionBest 10 months ago
THIS IS A SPARTICLES!!!
lee3nfi3ld460 10 months ago
"read the mind of God". Yeah, that's not reaching, I can compare that belief to the Tower of Babel and you saw how well that ended.
PT1231 10 months ago
@PT1231 Actually sir I didn't see anything from the tower of babel... did you?
AspLode 10 months ago
never mind their size, think its amazing we can create black holes in in the first place,
AndreLeCoz 10 months ago
Michio Kaku is utterly insane, and so are his black hole-making buddies.
JesusDillinger 11 months ago
Uh uuh....uum...Higgs Boson.
thosearepinklemons 11 months ago
its there dream not the peoples were doomed
cosmicfeedom 11 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
10 billion euro's??? how about using it to end world hunger? neh? shrimate! hmmm.. anyway there is still a percentage of it making the machine unstable. now that earthquake are frequent in the world.
emorocker168 11 months ago
10 billion euro's??? how about using it to end world hunger? neh? shrimate! hmmm.. anyway there is still a percentage of it making the machine unstable. now that earthquake are frequent in the world.
emorocker168 11 months ago
@emorocker168 If we keep advancing in science world hunger may well be cured. What's better, a cure for a disease or 100 thousand iron lungs?
ELEMENT1111100 11 months ago
@emorocker168 the only way to end world hunger is not to spend 10billion $, but to end the fed , kill off imf, ecb. bankrupt the banks. free us from debt.
colinjockgraham 11 months ago
Did the guy on the left just insinuate that the 4th dimension, was the internet?
Lobos222 11 months ago
@AlwaysDisagreeing Hawkings radiation is, of course, purely theoretical. Although improbable, if this minuscule theory is wrong, we are fucked lol.
quelorepario 11 months ago
this...is...SPARTICLES.
XxidocoversxX 11 months ago
i wear SPECTACLES!
brutishquito 11 months ago
Michio Kaku not only makes complex topics accessible to the layman, he makes them remarkably interesting. I dream to be half as smart as that man.Thanks to Kaku I plan on going for a degree in physics. You f'n rock Michio!
TheeVoiceOfReason 11 months ago 24
I wonder what is the latest news about this hadron collider?
mrpion33r 11 months ago
@mrpion33r well I'm not the one who is gonna bring you the news but just to say that I'm interested too xD if you find anything let me know and so will I :)
FCChelsea2010 11 months ago
heh, but are these particles that hit earch, mini black holes? NO they are not. So isn't the concept of a black hole that it keeps sucking in everything around it? so it will take 20 years, but it will suck in everything!!! OOOOOOOOOOOOOO
BriefHistoryOfTime 11 months ago
I'm pretty sure Michio is a Yogi
willplez 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
We hit it off so well after another visit busizz4me.info
vmasaatukorala 1 year ago
Anybody else think of Wrath of Khan when he said Genesis Machine?
Metrukuta 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fine looking big girls looking for you naneedj.info
lavonnajenny 1 year ago
This machine gets us closer to Phil Collins? Sweet deal.
DTMTroy 1 year ago
SandustanBrasov
Through the relativity theory of Einstein of over one century, it hold with strength - as a conspiracy a general activity of intellectual stultify of the planetary population. From relativity theory proceed the notion of: singularity, big bang, black holes and holes of worm. From 1905 and till now 2011, the disciples of to Einstein, preach with contumely, as scientific elements of high class these theoretical confusions, these absurdities from which they had made a business.
sandustanBrasov 1 year ago
is anyone else in love with Michio in the least gayest way possible?
IIZODIIAC 1 year ago 156
@IIZODIIAC Yup, he's one of the most intelligent and interesting people in the world. I would love to have a personal conversation with him, and maybe he could have my babies <3 lol jk I'm not gay, but I do have a lot of respect for him :)
AGVZ777 10 months ago
@AGVZ777 lol yeah he would lose me on his second sentence but that would be cool : )
IIZODIIAC 10 months ago
@IIZODIIAC you bet I love Michio Kaku. He is a genuine thinker. Einstein said "Imagination is more important than knowledge". After all, a mind is not a vessel to be *filled* but rather, a fire to be *kindled*
TFWC88 7 months ago
@TFWC88 absolutely, without imagination knowledge would not exist so i agree with that 100%
IIZODIIAC 7 months ago