Why Christians have it wrong (5 of 50)

[900pack]

i bet this guys gets pussy

[LoneMonk1]

Imagine the universe as a virtual computer program. We were programmed to access our host source without interruption. The dragon introduced a virus which has been attacking and corrupting all of our virtual universe. The dragon's virus attempts to block our access to the Father (our host). There is no dualism, its an infection. We are the anti-virus program team, we must attack the dragon and reclaim the Sacred Space for God.

[malakhhatzadik]

@LoneMonk1 Wow, man. I don't think I've ever met someone who has had it all figured out as well as you. :-)

[antonny11]

@LoneMonk1 That sounds exactly like the Novel Valis.

[Cdouglas0906]

I'm a Christian and we don't have it all together, I don't think we are living Christ-like lives. Something is wrong. Sinners loved Jesus, the religious did not obviously. I'm not all together but living the lifestyle He would want is constantly on my mind. Atheist have a right to be angry about accusations and treatment over the years. God bless you, and all who are watching your videos.

[7greenjeans7]

Some of what you say (and quote) in this vid is reminiscent of a line in Shakespeare's "Hamlet".

"There is nothing either good or bad but thinking makes it so."

I've often wondered if the really big word in "Love's Labour Lost" (honorificabilitudinitatibus), together with the scene in which it appeares, reveals a Rosicrucian connection. Some say it decodes into a latin phrase: Honorabili Ordoni Christiani Rosicrucis Filius Initiatus. I haven't looked into it myself though.

[babylama1]

I enjoy listening to you. By what do we gauge good, bad, evil, pessimism, optimism. How do we define these concepts and what do they entail.

[UnoRaza]

Where in the "NEW" Bibles does it say this?

No where.

[malakhhatzadik]

Learn to distinguish between beliefs and facts, between believing and knowing, and I will indulge you a little, on the condition that you will actually hear me out in these videos.

[SILVERTINKER4578]

ok Christians they hear what people tell them they say pagan and stuff is bad and dats BUT thats where they get the Christmas tree and star and stuff from spiritual people actually find the truth from the one God himself christian only listen to what people have change and say over time maybe they haven't notice the history of the church

[SILVERTINKER4578]

YES omg ty christian are omg ARGH i just saw this sick vid about how a christian saying fairy's, angels, meditations are demons and wrong to do and so is the new age. Isn't that just sick how he spend his time to say that.?? i wanted to smack the baldness(mrs clean) out of him lol

[MJRNKR]

Since you're obviously well researched I'm probably stating the obvious but you are familiar with the protestant justification for original sin= God made man good (presumably woman too) Man (read woman) stuffed up God's good work because a self made evil (possibly Lucifer/Satan/ whatever) corrupted him, so God kicked Man out of Paradise and sin became an inhereted genetic trait. Totally bipasses the need for dualism. Not greatly convincing, quite a weak argument but quite popular.

[lokiraccoon]

On your discussion of Luther's concept of Depravity recognition (becoming broken and humble) as a faulty doctrine: Is that not directly from the beatitudes? Poor in Spirit (broken) who will be humble enough to attain the kingdom? Likewise, the meek inheriting the earth? I, from an analytical psych background, parallel this with the alchemical need for separatio and nigredo before the conjunctio of enlightenment in the opus...

[malakhhatzadik]

Meekness/humility is not the same thing as self-induced suffering. God does not want us to suffer. The difference is between the once-born and the twice-born. "Christians" CLAIM to be "born again" but if they actually were then there would be the conjunctio you speak of, so clearly they aren't.

[Godz1Chozen]

I really think you should be very careful when you Refer to Jesus, as the anti-christ! That is direct Blasphemy, and might I add that GOD considered that to be an "unpardonable sin" =. I am not condemning you, or judging you, it is just that as a believer I have to stress the importance of you not calling GOD= the antichrist.

[Godz1Chozen]

See friend this is what I mean, Jesus, said that in the context of we should always strive for perfection, for if we strive for perfection, which is GOD, we strive for rightousness, knowing full well, that no human being can be totally rightous, for we are sinful beings. But your interpretation is that Jesus said, be perfect, as your heavenly father is perfect, in the context, of us being as GOD IS! The clay can never be smarter than the potter.

[malakhhatzadik]

Who said anything about being "smarter than the potter"? I've already thoroughly debunked the devilish doctrines of free will, original sin, prevenient grace, etc. So why, when YAHSHUA (please don't EVER talk about him this way again when speaking with me) says "be perfect," why do you instead on trying to make other people conform to your false dogmas in order not to be? What you say is a blatantly direct contradiction of what you claim to espouse.

[malakhhatzadik]

*instead = insist

[Godz1Chozen]

First of all, again friend, I think your quest for knowledge, has made you stumble. By this I mean, YOu say, YAHSHUA, Which is also translated to Joshua, which is all translated to JESUS! It is sort of like arguing that GOD and ALLAH are not the same? When they both are interpreted as GOD=The Creator(notice all caps)=different interpretation of the word. See this is where the devil confuses us, we waste so much time on trivial things such as interpretations, Does GOD not have the power?

[malakhhatzadik]

How long will you be of two opinions? If YHWH is God, then worship him. If Baal is God, then worship him. -the Bible

[Godz1Chozen]

I am only of one FACT, That Jesus is GOD manifested in human flesh, the second part of the GOD HEAD=The Trinity. And it is amazing, that Jesus was not actually the only MAN preaching in HIS time, yet to this day, Millions of people have the need to disprove, His relevancy, Jesus is the only name that has stood the test of time. GOD/ JESUS=the exact same. But I guess you think GOD the all Powerful, does not have the POWER to have a supernatural existence.

[Godz1Chozen]

Oh yeah, I meant to ask how am I blatantly contradicting what I claim to espouse?

[malakhhatzadik]

ummm Maybe you should just watch the videos eh?

[BranchintheVine]

"If we claim to be without sin, we deceive ourselves and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just and will forgive us our sins and purify us from all unrighteousness. If we claim we have not sinned, we make him out to be a liar and his word has no place in our lives." (1 John 1:8-10)

"I tell you the truth, unless a man is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God." (John 3:3)

[malakhhatzadik]

I am SO SICK of addressing this issue. If you would even bother to learn the basics of the English language, much less employ them in your quest for an all-encompassing Jewish/legalistic subversion of scripture, OR listen to what I have to say in the videos without being dismissive of the truth simply because it doesn't conform to your preconceived notions, then you would quickly realize that to HAVE sinned is not to BE a sinner and that your whole position is as untenable as it is absurd.

[BranchintheVine]

Point number 4: All I did was quote scripture. Amazingly you think that what you have to say is greater than scripture, even when you l blatantly contradict it. AMAZING!

Point number 5: "unless a man is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God", let alone make a 50 part video about it..

And a kingdom is a kingdom because it has a king! And it's not Buddha! You need to be be born again to know our King, Jesus, without which you have no authority to speak of Him.

[malakhhatzadik]

Contradict? You have not only quoted scripture. You have also insinuated that it supports the anti-scriptural "Christian" paradigm with the typical knee-jerk dismissiveness you've been programmed with. I'm not the one who thinks that what I have to say is greater than scripture, because I'm not the one who has traded the oracles of God for teachings of men.

Sorry to break it to you, but your "Jesus" will be destroyed along with all you other antichrists who worship him just like scripture says.

[malakhhatzadik]

No truth can be contrary to reason. Think about it.

[Godz1Chozen]

I really think Jesus, spoke of these types of believers, they have been decieved by the deciever, notice, they base the truth about Jesus, based on mistakes of human beings who like all of us are flawed, Man can never give a perfect interpretation of GOD, we are imperfect beings! Jesus said it, "Let those who have eyes to see, see, and ears to hear, hear.

[malakhhatzadik]

Be perfect, even as your heavenly father is perfect.

-"Jesus"

[Godz1Chozen]

I reffered to him as Jesus, as did you, see how insignificant that really is. GOD will give everyone his REAL name in GLORY< NO man knows this name, not even Abraham, Moses, or Paul. I admire your knowledge, you are a very astute young man, but you have to ask yourself, why is it that you Limit GOD to a denomination. When clearly, Jesus, did not approve, of organized religion.

[malakhhatzadik]

You think it's "insignificant" that you worship Mithras? ok suit yourself...

I wonder what denomination I'm being accused of relegating God to though. My curiosity would be indulged if you were to tell me.

[Godz1Chozen]

If I recall correctly from your first vid, that you stated that you are a Hebrew Isrealite? forgive me if I am wrong, but don't you see that in itself is also a denomination, like minded people searching for the TRUTH about GOD. And Mithras, is YOUR interpretation, my interpretation of Jesus, is the Light of the World. You see GOD does not only deliver his message in scripture, He reaveals it in many ways, so your effort to refutiate the Bible, has no bearing with GOD's true existence.

[Jerkis2121]

You don't even know what u are saying!

[malakhhatzadik]

I think it's apparent to every thinking individual who watches these videos that I do. Thanks for the mindless ad hominem attack though. your curse = my blessing

[Praetendere]

The shroud of Turin is not the shroud used for the man from Nazareth. It has been examined numerous times and despite the fact that its exact age has been rendered indeterminable, all evidence suggests that it was not the shroud of the Nazarene.

Moreover, you postulate as fact the proposition that a man rose from the dead.

You have stuffed your head so far up your ass it's actually coming back out of your mouth. Congratulations.

[malakhhatzadik]

Its exact age is not indeterminable. It has consistently been dated to the first century and to Palestine by every single of the dozens of scientific tests that have been performed on it. The ONLY one that has ever produced a different result was, as I said, the falsified C-14 test which was done on the perforated edge rather than on the shroud itself to intentionally deceive people like you. Now either evidence your claim so that I can properly debunk it or grow up and take back your insult.

[Praetendere]

Link me to those scientists, please.

The C-14 tests were conducted by three separate teams across three countries. They consistently came up with the dates of 12601390 as the age of the piece they cut; to assess the shroud's age as being any older, they'd need to cut a piece from somewhere near the center.

People see Jesus in the shroud because that's what they want to see--evidence to support their highly unlikely beliefs.

[malakhhatzadik]

You're still talking about the piece which was cut from the fringe which is so obviously a medieval addition, not the shroud itself. Read Ian Wilson's The Blood and the Shroud.

The only thing "highly unlikely" is that people who have a predisposition to the truth will ever accept it at face value.

[Thatonedude917]

I propose to you that YOU (malakhhatzadik) have a "predisposition to the truth."

[goblue2120]

the shroud of turin is a fake.

[malakhhatzadik]

Were you even paying attention? There is no possible way that a negative photographic image could be imprinted on an ancient burial shroud with any kind of ancient technology. It's simply not possible. Any objective person has to accept that it was imprinted as the result of some highly sophisticated (extra-terrestrial or futuristic) technological means, or that there is something "supernatural" (spooky) about it. Either way it's not "fake." See #46, read Ian Wilson's The Blood and the Shroud.

[thetruthwilsetusfree]

U r right. The shroud is authentic. From it's DNA we have received Daniel's beast, soon to rule.

Where do you live Malachi? If you are near Chicago I would like to meet you. I've watched many of your videos and I've found few ppl on here as knowledgeable on factual theology and prophecy as you. If not, thank you for speading this information.

Quick question, if nearly all of the world's population is contaminated with the serpent seedline as you claimed, Are we all damned?

[malakhhatzadik]

I am currently residing in Montreal. To answer your question, no we are not.

[davfritz]

I have seen documentaries where they have demonstrated simple methods of produceing a negative image. I think you are very mistaken on this point

[malakhhatzadik]

You cannot produce a perfectly accurate three-dimensional negative image without some sort of device that makes use of the photoelectric effect. It's impossible, and it was never done prior to the 19th century, much less on some extremely important religious artifact with a well-attested history going back to the 1st century that just happens to have had the exact same image as the one now on it.

[lathankilbrand]

@malakhhatzadik While I have just started watching your videos and am skeptical of much, in regards to the shroud your statements are true. The technology simply didn't exist to fake it and while the carbon-14 test failed and yes, the circumstances of the failure are very suspect. Every other test given the shroud has "passed the test". Should be noted that carbon-14 testing has it's own issues as well.

[theblacksun8]

those who spoke of jesus said that it is by grace of god we are saved. they said, the man jesus who u killed bared witness. he was the lamb of god and the sacrifice for your sins. jesus said the truth will set you free. jesus said "i am the truth the life and the way, no one comes to the father but through the son"

[malakhhatzadik]

It is a fallacy to associate this term "son" with the natural person of Jesus only since the same term is used in the same context dozens of times throughout the New Testament. It is also a fallacy to claim that Jesus was a "sacrifice" according to the Jewish/Satanic holokaustos tradition which paints God as the evil principle of a dual-principle divinity, a man, a mere human persona who delights in bloodletting, so evil that he demands the murder of his own "only brought-forth son." God is love

[malakhhatzadik]

"If you had known the meaning of this phrase: 'I desire mercy, not sacrifice,' you would not have condemned the guiltless."

The true Christian religion of the Bible has no continuity with and is diametrically opposed to the legalism, the spiritual depravity, the malice, the spirit of error of the Judaism.

[receiptexpires]

when you say (6:50) that christianity is unsound in its teachings; i have the same notion/idea. in that (6:55) that ppl are naturally evil or the teaching that there is an atonement and original sin, which is contradictory to such scripture like deuteronomy 24:6. from what you state here and from what is written i can understand why some would say that christians are those who have gone astray from the original teachings.

[Quandary121]

I have heard mention that Jesus did not acceded into heaven after the resurrection.? And that he went into India.? maybe he taught buddhism there or that that's what the peoples there called his teachings. I could be well off in this as i do not know when buddhism started or whether he was taught it?

[receiptexpires]

i have theories that jesus didn't die on the cross, or died and was resurrected. I have a notion that he was saved from death and was raised up possible as enoch and elijah had been taken. who knows eh?

[malakhhatzadik]

This is one of the spirit of antichrist (Manichaean) teachings. It is false. Yahshuah did actually die and come back to life. The Bible affirms it (unless we are to believe that the Roman soldiers were simply inept at every single one of their soldierly duties...), and the Shroud of Turin proves it.

[Quandary121]

It is easy to see the faults of others,hard to see one's own.One sifts the faults of others like chaff,but covers up one's own,as a crafty cheater covers up a losing throw.  THE BUDDHA

How similar this is to Matthew 7:3

"Why do you look at the speck of sawdust in your brother's eye and pay no attention to the plank in your own eye?

coincidence or are you right about the missing years of Jesus