Added: 4 years ago
From: RussiaToday
Views: 197,994
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (1,046)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Comment removed

  • yeah yeah. Russia is sooo powerful compared to US... or atleast thats what they think..

  • '

    ussr russia is a poor country,,,

    did big lean borrow from japan currency,,,

    where ussr russia get currency to make air defense system come from,,,

    ussr russia is always waste waste to make many missiles / rockets too much

  • "Joint Defense Imitative"

    Russia's way of saying, "Our missile shield is shit. Can we be friends?"

    RT's translation: "Russia is so badass and America sucks!"

  • Russia has a new air defense system.

    It's a sad day for the American crop duster.

  • s-400 is good but is guided not bye hot of engine or iron

    this is camera so when computer see plane ......... end of plane ;)

  • Stupid armchair warrior kids dont know a thing about aircraft designs. I do however love trolling trolls trolling.. They make for great laughs and good TKO's!!

  • It's a good thing no one makes a missile the seeks radar.

  • rofl.... it wont track a stealth aircraft, stupid russians, i'd like to see them put putin on the line for that claim, have an F22 fly over russian skies with putin out in the middle, see which kills which first, the f-22 kills putin, or the AA system kills the F-22

  • @armydude162 No one can fly into another country and fly out without being shot down, right? Oh wait....

  • @gregrutz oh wait...... the U2 flew over your country ALL THE TIME until you finally found something to shoot them down, when i was too late XD

  • @armydude162 Ummm, really? You really think the US is going to fly an F22 into Russian airspace? Are you insane? That would 1) probably start a nuclear war

    2) result in F22 being forced to land and confiscated by Russia

    3) result in F22 being shot down and the wreckage confiscated by Russia

    All outcomes are negative. The F22 is not invisible for christ sakes you moron, it is LOW OBSERVABLE, and that doesnt mean from every angle. Trust me, flying into Russian airspace is the last mistake you make

  • @mattmatt115 by the time you turn our technology form the crashed F-22 it will be low tech, same scenario, with the F-117 nighthawk, that stealth technology is obsolete and the Russians use it on their PAK-FA which is an obsolete plane...

    the F-22 has a self destruct mechanism that destroys all important technology and just leaves shit

  • @McLarenMercedes: Finaly i see someone who know the history from bouth sides

  • what does russia need weapons for , honestly cant face Nato, however nato does not seek a conflict with russia, so what is the plan? Nuke China? hehe

  • @statnone

    If you were Russian and knew how many times in history the country has been attacked. Would you still trust Nato?? I'd say the Russians have every right in the world to be suspicious and not trust their neighbours.

    Also unlike Nato, Russia devotes its military strenght to defend their motherland, not to attack some dictator who has suddenly become a nuisance to them, after being an "ally" for a time.

    The plan is to ensure its survival, and more importantly healthy competition.

  • @McLarenMercedes yes you could be right.

  • Este é dos anos 80 e tecnologicamente não trás nada de novo. É uma renovação do sistema, permitindo-o ser mais rápido e abrangente, tentando deste modo aumentar a segurança e diminuir o risco. O S-400 começou a ser comercializado, o que é sinonimo de abandono do projecto, para algo mais eficiente e neste projecto russos e americanos estam lado a lado.

  • how can it accept if the S-400 never seen action? 

  • amazing..

  • Comment removed

  • very impressive but can it stop the UFO's?

  • About time they get a new Air Defense System. Remember when Mathais Rust, a nineteen year old, flew a Cessna 172 into Red Square?

  • @pilot495

    Try do same thing now.

  • @pilot495

    Remember when the towel heads flew a passenger jet into the Pentagon :))

  • @pilot495 Yes I remeber that events it took the Russian's by suprise with their pants down that a kid was able to fly right into Red Square with a Cessna .

    I think it would be best to take about only 2% of what RT is reporting on can only be true and the rest is normal Russian BS !

    When a Russian is talking thats when you know he is a liar !

  • @pilot495 Oh, c'mon. Rust was intercepted more than once. They haven't shot him down only because they feared a fallout of the same magnitude they had after KAL007.

  • @pilot495

    Yeah,and remember the time GeorgeW.Bush tried to bump start the Cold War again by placing a missile "defence" in Poland (the same reckless planning as placing missiles in military junta Turkey during the 60's which led to the 1961 Cuban missile crisis as a response) and talking about some grand missile defence,when 9/11 happened? A small group of muslim fanatics managed to take flight lessons and evade capture by the CIA

    Suddenly,helping muslims in Balkans seemed like a bad decision

  • looking forward the B-2 to destroy the S-400!

  • @F35JSFA1 - xaxa... S-400 can locate the targets on 0.002m space from 400km. B2 has no chance. Even in Poland he is fucked.

  • @bittemeinrammstein okay... prove it?

  • @F35JSFA1

    Stop your bitch fight please.

  • 9 peoples was killed by Stalin! and the number growing...

  • @ 2:00 could his hat be ANY bigger?

  • @wang0fett haha a little bigger and he won't be using any umbrella xD

  • if any radar system detects an enemy aircraft, the best for superpowers is to use their fastes aiplanes.

  • the best air-defense system by far, which china no doubt will copy making there own version

  • No way ! there going to sell it to IRAN?

  • @spacecop67 IRAN GOT S-300 ..... No-one is going to get S-400

  • @spacecop67 why not??? you are afraid for us planes??? :-)

  • This is a badass system......don't wanna be on the business end of it.

  • What about your shuttle ?????? You fucking moron!!!!

  • LOL russia couldnt get three satellites into orbit they crashed in the pacific ocean today..AAAAAHHHHHAAAA!!tryin to compete with United States GPS Navigation Technology! wow HMMM YEAH FOR THOSE OF U WHO SAY RUSSIA is advanced GIV ME A BREAK DUMBASSES..the entire world uses U.S. Tech haters!!

  • @99jiujitsu What about your shuttle?How many more times it will be delayed?Fucking morons.

  • @maximus2009able LOL what about are shuttles!!! lmao damn!! thats all u have we own space lmao!!! lame...AAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHAAAA rOLLEN

  • @99jiujitsu The entire world uses a lot more russian technology than American moron.

  • @9hello123 oh you mean poor countries buy it cause its cheap!! yeah rpgs from the 50s..and yeah the Cheap AK47 and cheap migs..You mean 3rd world countries dumbass.. "Moron"

  • @99jiujitsu I'm sorry what? Are the only things in the world military in your eyes?

    If you think there is more American technology used in the first world than Russian you are incredibly deluded.

  • @9hello123 yes i do dumbass...they are light years behind...i guess you wr born in 1991...when thr Empire collapsed..they are trying to rebuild a crumbled military...yeah 500 billion dollars to build up an old much needed reconstruction...yes the United States is way ahead in tech..russia dose not have the Money..the only advance ove the U.S. is Air Defense...

  • @99jiujitsu You must be the most idiotic person on earth in my eyes and many many other people seems to think that too. You stupidity exceeds the combination of all mentally retarded people of the face of the earth.

  • @MsSuviMarja ...Russia is a joke.Im retarded because i state FACTS..RT

  • @9hello123 jACKASS lmao ChECK OUT abc news on youtube..stealth Blackhawk....yes the one Seal team 6 used...then blew up...yeah I knw Pakistan picked up what was left AND PRBLY WILL NOT GIV IT UP.. MAYBE AFTER THEY SHOW CHINA ...Hmm I did see russia with a copy of the F22 a prototype!!!..yeah the chinks have one too a prototype!! also the pakistanis phone service went out and power...yes cell phones too...how weird lol and came on after the U.S was gone..... weird....LOL..

  • soviet russia and even todays russia have always been ahead of the west when it comes to advanced weaponry.

  • @conza410 Youre full of shit u mean cheap weaponry!!!Dumbass..they dont have the money for advanced tech!!

  • @99jiujitsu its actually true so before u go running ur big mouth off read a book.

  • @conza410 Dude if I want to run my mouth Im going to..what are going to do!!Russia was Saved by the Winter...thr also goood at dieing!!!say what u want .Russia couldnt have won with out the U.S.

  • @99jiujitsu now i knew u yanks were dumb but my god did i underestimate that. you say russia couldn't have won without the U.S? hahaha i am laughing at you because did u know that the U.S would never have invaded nazi occupied france without the UK lol and could u please tell me what the U.S did to help russia they did fuck all infact u were struggling so much with japan that even russia was gonna join in with the fight and i think its clear that u don't have a clue what u are talking about.

  • @conza410 yeah we struggled with japan on r own..lol Hey we wr ready to invade the mainland of japan and russia declaires war on manchiria...get the fuck out!!! Russia didnt do shit in that war..hmm yeah we destroyed Japans entire Navy!!,airforce!! dude just go away!! youre talken out ur large loose russian asshole...LMFAO ur russia couldnt get 3 satilites into space they crashed into the Ocean TODAY...trying to compete with U.S. GPS Navigation Tech..you clowns are so far behind.

  • @99jiujitsu yeah yeah but what about the 2 space shuttles that crashed killing crew members DOUCHEBAG and every one uses U.S tech? hmmmm i bet i can think of more countries that don't than more countries do. lol ur immatureness makes me laugh ur proberly some 14 year old who does not realise that ur economy is crumbling go to school and read more books imbred.

  • @conza410 Dude have u guys been to the moon!lol DUMBASS are economy will be fine!!! keep haten!!..dumbass whos 14 u knw europe and other countries rely on our economy fuckface!! how many people have you guys lost in space...dude face it America is so far advanced..u guys finsh trying to make the wheel yet...??

  • @99jiujitsu lol i am haten? and thats comming from the guy who actually started the haten u yanks must be so jealous that the russians have new air defence systems lol and u say that america is far more advanced than russia lol so why is it u can't even make ur own air defence system that is just as brilliant as the s-400 or even the up comming s-500 and i am sorry for dropping u in your own trap but people like u don't have a clue what their talking about.

  • @conza410 Has youre sams even been used against real stealth dumbass!!! no!! I guess you tested it against the B-2 and f-35,f22..we do not care what you cl0wns build you cant even put youre own GPS in space..Douchebag

  • @99jiujitsu has the patriot system even been used against real stealth no because the patriot is outdated and the S-300 series, and its range is at least twice that of the MIM-104 Patriot system and the S-500 is reportedly be able to outperform the S-400, which already outperformed the Patriot Advanced Capability-3 system ur patriot system is nothing anymore and THAAD now don't get me started with that the THAAD was designed to hit Scuds and similar weapons another piece of yankee shit.

  • @conza410 dude why is russia so worried if thaad is shit...hmmm i wonder why...keep running youre gums dumbass

  • @99jiujitsu when have ever said russia is scared of thaad if anything the US is scared of the S-400 and S-500 sams. not to mention the THAAD is designed to knock out scuds which is 1950s tech not 21st century tech like the S-400 which is designed to knock out anthing from planes to ICBMS which taad can't do and i hope u know that thaad is nothing more than a typical yankee useless piece of crap lol i don't think there is a country on this planet that produces more shit than america.

  • @conza410 hows the gps launch going lol...s400 hasnt even been used in war douchebag!!!Oh its not a big deal is that whay the russians want the united states to stop missile defense or thr will be no strategic arms reduction treaty!!!Russian jets yeah they did real well against Israeli airforce...hmmm they used americAN jets how many migs wr shot out of the sky lol

  • @99jiujitsu hows ur economy going lol and i hope u know that just because a missile or a plane or whatever doesn't have a combat record it doesn't mean they underperform besides u should know because your f35 for example has never seen action and already ur saying its cutting edge technology and why the fuck are u talking about the isreali airforce using american jet shooting down migs out of the sky i don't know if u noticed but where actually talking about air defence retard.

  • @conza410 Dumbass you are the one saying the u.s. builds shitty expensive weapons!!! dumbass...who the fuck cares what you build. the economy will turn around its not going to go Kupt like russias did..dude shut the fuck up!!we are still the greatest superpower russia isnt and you are trying to acheve that and its not going to happen

  • @99jiujitsu the greatest superpower? yeah how long for it won't be long before china is in the lead and it will leave the USA behind face it man ur economy is crumbling ur loosing the war in afghanistan its like america has already pressed the self destruction button and i see u have no other argument to back up that the US has the best weaponry and has always been in the lead i think its proberly because the facts have caught up with u now.

  • @conza410 We are not losing the war in afghanistan you stupid fucken idiot!! we crushed the taliban in the first week.when the war started.Iraq caused the USA to lose focus in Afghanistan.. thats why the taliban is stronger rt now...Iraq war is over now we can focus on finishing off taliban for good..us wepons suck yeah like i said before Air combat in 6day war Israeli airforce destroyed migs with usa weapons (Jets)..who cares u have sam sites big deal...we will not get destroyed like russia LOL

  • @99jiujitsu dude you have nothing to say..you are talking about the United states economy yeah we are strugling rt now..but we are still ahead economically then russia even in disstress LOL..your country was in afghanistan for 9 years and lost 15,000 men dumbass!! We do have the best weaponry..Samsites cant not keep jets from hiting thr targets!! the only super power to crumble was the soviets..what are you going to come back with missiles again!! Beat it dreamer..american hater!

  • @99jiujitsu yeah yeah buddy and what kind of pilots were the isrealis up against u see buddy u can give a mig to a country like egypt and put them up against isreali pilots flying pieces of junk (american jets) and u will find that isreal will always win but thats got nothing to do with the plane they are flying its got something to do with the skill of the pilots and i am not from russia u retarded yankee imbreded fuck.

  • @conza410 excuses excuses,LMFAO!!!! China!! AHHHHHHHHHHHHAAAA bITCH be nice before we take our manufactures over to india...and tel youre country to get fucked!!!!you have no rt to talkshit wit the way you build cheap ass products!!!!fucken chink!!!oh by the way iM NOT whitete...Damn rt Im a yankee....KEEP GOOGLING YOURE INFO AND BLV THE russian hype ahhhhhhaaaaa cHINA!!!! seriously...Get off russian nuts bro and stop jocken them....Later.

  • @99jiujitsu ur imatureness makes me laugh that u would even dare comming on youtube trying to act like the big guy and can i say why aren't u sticking to the main subject. Is it because ur backing down from the argument u weak little boy or is it because u have nothing else to say about the main subject if so i am wasting my time arguing with a little boy like u who has just learned his first bad word so u going to come back with some valid information to continue this or is it past ur bed time?

  • @conza410 Dude what do you want me to argue about....that russia has a new air defense system????they just started using the system...has It shot down any Planes B-2 F22,f35????NO YOURE GOING OFF WHAT THE RUSSIANS ARE SAYING...thats fine....the patriot system works it was used in war...S400 s100000000 hasnt been proven...IN WAR TIME..thr is no valid information on this system...YOU THINK RUSSIAN WEAPONS ARE BETTER THR NOT...dude go away you live in china????

  • @99jiujitsu lol but has the s-400 system even been in service long enough to see action NO!. yet it has already been proven to have a range of 400 km. This is more than twice of the range of the American MIM-104 Patriot system which again makes me laugh to see that the so called country with the best weaponry still uses an outdated system lol and i bet no sam in the world can shoot down stealth planes such as f22 but the s-400 have the capibillitys to do so and thaad can't even take out an ICBM.

  • @conza410 WHO is going to be stupid enough to attack the united states with foreign airpower????we dont need to update..we have the money what air power do we have to fear,,um nobody...why dose russia need it because of stealth technology thats why???they fear amercan planes and allies.....United States can upgrade if they want...the patriot was used in 1991..U dont knw what thaad can do and why is russia so worried if thaad is useless??? the cold war ended in 89. we dont need to update rt now

  • @99jiujitsu i don't know if u know but russia and china have stealth aircraft aswell and we could easily fly to america undetected and unchallenged by your SAMs and bombard u country just like u did to iraq or even nuke it and if ur country had nobody to fear then why the hell are u still in afghanistan and iraq and u are now trying to work with the chinese to keep north korea undercontrol lol thats why air defence is important lol 9/11 perfect example to why ur air defence failed.

  • @conza410 You fucken retard Russia has one fucken air craft that is stealth one that is stil being tested 1!!!!!!! they have 0 in production..LMFAO China ahhhhhhaaa you are funny man....9/11 they hijacked commercial airliners dumbass.you are such a dumbass, fly undetected with what???dose china have an airforce????russian planes would be intercepted. we dont have to work with china retard thats why we sent ships to the yellow sea and they wr mad!!! North korea is a joke. hhahha you are funnyboy

  • @99jiujitsu so this is what the real meaning of todays american yeah don't you think we know that there were commercial airliners hijacked on 9/11 dumbass yet ur country who u claim is the most technologically advanced in the world can't even shoot down 4 airliners so u tell me how the hell u are gonna protect yourself from ICBMs and other missile lol ur backing down from an argument which from the start u clearly could not win because u can't keep to the main subject.

  • @conza410 ok now youre bringing up 9/11 it has nothing to do with technoligy it would have happend in china and russia too...wait russia just would have shot planes full of innocent passengers out the sky. now you have to talk about ICBMS no country can shoot them all out of the sky retard...Russian air defense has been good for years but its can be penatrated just like ur anus likes to be. Youre talken about Russian tech which is a 2nd to the U.S..what dose china have bring smthen to the table

  • @99jiujitsu i am not bringing up 9/11 i am talking about how ur air defence systems failed and of course if u had the brains u would have rather shot down an aircraft filled with 50-200 passengers on board than let it kill thousands of innocent people and nope i think u will find that chinese tech is 2nd to russia because i bet u don't even know what kind of tech we have because unlike u we don't show it to the world so that people can't exploit it lol better look next time american.

  • @conza410 We dont have an air defense system not since the 60s dumbass..now youre talking how we show our technology off oh like the russians.Umm when we have plains in service and equipment its hard to hide. Dumbass..China dose not have the money jackass maybe thr working on somthen but they are decades behind the United States.you are brainwashed now go make some toys for 95 cents a hour.

  • @99jiujitsu the problem with u is u can only argue with insults but when it comes down to the facts the truth really hurts u and smacks u right in the face. the impression i get off u is u don't have much if not any knowledge of warfare and tech so let me ask u why do u even bother arguing with someone who does?

  • @conza410 dude you runing youre mouth and supporting Russian Tech, countrys buy russian and U.S weapons dumbass. the only thing we buy from you is toys and cheap led toys shitty prouduct. the world makes fun of youre cheap product.you cant make an argument about a single peace of Millitary equipment theat china builds thats advanced over U.S. or russian tech..you are trying to sale russian air defense yeah its advanced but will not stop russia from being bombed. Russa and U.S  build the best.

  • @99jiujitsu and thats comming from the retarded yank u make me laugh u really do because it must be the whole world that makes fun of u for buying our shitty products and why can't u talk about the subject at hand do u have some sort of difficulty or are u trying to avoid comming face to face with the real truth because i have noticed whenever i throw one of these facts at u u seem to totally ignore it completely and everything u say has nothing to do with this subject so quit ur shit.

  • @conza410 Its obvious we are decades ahead on stealth, smartweapons, and drones...also laser tech too. these are facts.the subject started with sams...which can be penatrated,then u talked about tech...we are decades ahead.. its the truth and youre govt knows it, Im statn facts if you choose to ignore it thats fine. If stealth was a waste you china wouldnt be trying to design a plane..russia has a plane in testing not in production..decades behind. again facts.

  • @99jiujitsu nobody care about them facts because i actually started this argument by saying russia has always been ahead of the west in tech ( SAMs) and as it happens stealth tech can be penatrated to the s-400 has a few capabilities to do so and this is a perfect example of the future of SAM technology.

  • @conza410 those are not facts it hasent even been used in war...I do remember 1991 Iraq HAd the latest Sam air defense the Russian air defense and what happend..LOL. at the time russia then had the best air defense.lol..and they have it now..you take out sam radar no sam...it can be done with drones too.

  • @99jiujitsu yeah ur talking about a country that has untrained men working on SAM batteries so thats nothing to do with the actual system its because the iraqi army weren't willing to fight and how is it that the f35 is supposedly cutting edge tech yet it hasn't even entered service let alone seen combat and what happens when american pieces of junk enter russian airspace..LOL. i am talking about the U2 which is still in service today lol best tech my yellow ass.

  • @conza410 ..laugh all you want Iraq had the 4th largest army in the world(1991) and russian air defense untrained?? russia helped them set it up dumbass..we took out the sams those are facts how could they fight they wr destroyed look it up and stop being hardheaded its all on google dude. the U2 was shot down in 1960. it had been flying over russia since the 50s for years lol..oh and china too.its still in service just updated. it led to the sr-71 inservice 1966 it was never hit. best tech!!

  • @99jiujitsu lol the sr-71 is the best tech? and did u know that its airframe is 85% made from titanium so that it wouldn't burn up in such high speed and russia is the worlds largest producer of titanium FACT! and also did u know that russian titanium was used to build the sr71s airframe FACT! lol so that would pretty much make the sr-71 85% russian tech . sp i am sorry to drop u in ur own trap but that is perfect proof of u admitting that the russians have the best tech.

  • @conza410 Titanium is a metal element its every were in the world lol it wasnt invented by russians dumbass and the tech of the plane is from 1966 which shows you how advanced the tech in the united states is..yes I knw its made out of titanium retard!! how is it russian dumbass titanium was discovered 1791 in the united kingdom..you are really young or really stupid. why didnt the russians build sr71..Titanium comes from the earth you fucken retard. they didnt invent it.

  • @conza410 what you stated about SR71 being russian tech is the stupidist shit I have heard.. I think you are 15 because to make a commit like that just shows how incompetent you are.

  • @99jiujitsu ok dickhead can u tell me when in my comment did u say that russians invented titanium and the sr71 was made from russian titianium so u are the one who looks stupid now after saying shit that i didn't even say. lol and the sr71 is not even in service anymore so how can it be the best tech infact the only thing that is advanced about the sr71 is porberly its titanium airframe which was provided by russians and the rest of it is nothing more than a supersonic U2.

  • @conza410 Read youre post agaiin dumbass kid..yous said its russian tech and russian titanium...the metal comes from the earth dumbass,,It must be sadi tech to because it uses oil and oil comes from sadi....LOL.SR71 was hated by the russians they could never catch it or shoot it down..Nice try

  • @99jiujitsu russian titanium russian tech FACT! and i bet the US couldn't shoot down a sr71 even if they tried and do u realise if war did break out how much of a sitting duck ur country would be lol ur air defence can only handle something up to a scud if that and as 9/11 showed your jet fighters failed to intercept a passenger airline so how the hell would u intercept a stealth bomber so now do u realise how important air defence is.

  • @conza410 blah blah blah mad china boy!!! LMFAO.If u cant beat us join us..YOU ARE A SUCKA!!!

  • @99jiujitsu infact did u know that stealth tech can be pentreated for example One F-117 has been downed in combat with the Army of Yugoslavia. On 27 March 1999, during the Kosovo War the yugoslavin army using 1960s RUSSIAN ANTI AIR MISSILES and RUSSIAN RADAR operating on long wavelengths, making the aircraft visible to radar for brief periods downed the F-117 using 1960s RUSSIAN TECH lol ur stealth tech sucks.

  • @conza410 GOOGLE IT DUDE AND FIND OUT HOW IT WAS SHOT DOWN JACKASS...

  • @99jiujitsu it was shot down because the yugos were operating their RUSSIAN radars on unusual long wavelengths making the aircraft visible to radar for brief periods FACT! and also american stealth tech has been penetrated by RUSSIAN air defence tech FACT! lol u really don't know how much i am laughing at u.

  • @conza410 LMAO you cant handle the truth and facts!! ahhhaaa...everything you come back with coplaments the u.s.a maybe you china hackers will get lucky and steeeel stealth teck and maybe russia will finally build one into production...shhyeah rt and monkeys will fly out of my butt lol.later china!

  • @99jiujitsu lol u say i can't handle the truth and facts LMAO u have just stated there that u can't handle it because if u could u would have comeback with a valid argument against it haha don't make me laugh silly american.

  • @conza410 dude you maken your self look dumb we have 170 F22 inservice what makes you think the f35 wont be in service.ur talken about the U2 spyplane that flew in the 50s over russia numerous time before being shot down in 1960.In 1966 the SR71 bLACK BIRD went into service its still the worlds fastest plane It flew over N vietnam and red china..85000 ft and taken pics of lil pebbles. man like I sd way ahead.Russia didnt design it or have a spy plan. China is 20 25 years behind bro.

  • @conza410 Chna has stealth aircraft...WOW amazing what you will blv.China has russian migs if that...China tech is way behind..they havent even put a chinamen on the moon retard..Lol china stealth tech ahhahhhaa...

    Bye china boy...I think you have some screws loose

  • @conza410 WHAT A RETARD!!!! Who`s got Japan`s northern islands?????

  • @conza410 LMAO always been ahead, you keep telling yourself that. Hell Russia had ti buy a 3rd rate super computer from America to run their nuclear weapons lab. America has always been at least a decade in front with smart weapons as well. Simple facts.

  • @shark101au whatever u say dumb fuck.

  • @conza410 wow you are an angry little man. I'm sorry you have an inferiority complex, what I said however is fact. Sorry the facts don't agree with you.

  • How are these systems tested against stealth jets like B2? USA would obviously not lend their jets to Russia for their testing, right?

  • @orabackup

    Umm.. Well, why should Russia borrow some stealth jets from US?

    Russia has it own stealth jets, so i dont get your point?

  • @OldSchoolClassic94

    Well does stealth involve only radar/heat signatures of the aircraft body or anything additional too? I assumed total stealth testing against other aircraft would mean knowing atleast in some detail the opponents' aircraft, ie, their weapons, type of radars used, engine modes and so on... so I wanted to know how this stealth testing is done and how can a country be confident that their jets will not be detected by enemy radars.

  • @orabackup absolute stealth tec. doesn't exist.Destroying F-117A in Serbia it is proved.I can't say that was totally wasting of money but is close to the truth.Serbs told to world how they did this so now any country can do the same.For planes recognition, they are using classic radar sensors.

  • yay russia :D

  • @Hatinonthehaters The military tech is the same as people.The more uglyer and bigger they are the harder they are :).When you build something if you put too much importance on design you fail to deliver the real thing.The Russian military tech always would be a bit "scary" but it will get the job done.

  • RUSSIA IS A HEAD OF EVERYONE IN BALLISTIC MISSILES; THE S300 SERIES CONSIDERING THE BEST IN THE WORLD. EVEN ALL THE NATO MEMBERS ACKNOWLEDGE OF IT. CHINA IS INCREASING THE STOCKPILES OF THE S300. IRAN'S TRYING TO GET SOME, BUT THE U.S AND JEWS THREATEN RUSSIA OF TRADING COOPERATIONS; THIS IS WHY RUSSIA DOESN'T SUPPLY TO IRAN; IF THEY DID, ISRAEL AND AMERICA WOULD SHUT UP ALREADY.

  • what make this soviet rockets special and other countries  incapable of reverse engineering this system ??

  • @tuerlesrusses

    Reverse engineering the missile itself is one thing, but the radar, electronics, software is another...

    on the other hand... US used S-300V systems to help them upgrade their Patriot series missile systems.

  • The only stats we have available regarding the detection capabilities of Russia's S-400 missile system is it can track a target with an RCS of .02m^2 400km away. Due to the fact that the tracking range and RCS are logarithmically related, we could calculate the range at which it could track other planes with stealth capabilities. the F-22's RCS is .0001m^2 and the F-35's is .001 m^2.

    .02/.0001=200 .02/.001=20 Log(20)=1.301, Log(200)=2.301. 400/2.301=174 400/1.301=307

  • This means that the S-400 could track the F-22 174 km away and the F-35 307 km away. The F-22's best ASM can hit a target 150km away and the F-35s can hit a target 370km away. The F-22 wouldn't fair very well against the S-400 but the F-35 has the upper hand.

  • @1990PatMorrison

    Long range systems like the S-300/400 are under protection of systems such as the Tor-M1, which can shoot down ASMs.

  • @vtkrey the chances of interception are less than one half with the newer missiles

  • @1990PatMorrison

    Source?

  • @vtkrey Defense update W. Approximation

  • @1990PatMorrison

    The "online defence magasine"? can you be more specific?

    ..."could" be jammed, doesnt mean it will be jammed, the Tor-M1 is a modern system and is not defenceless against jamming.

  • @vtkrey Perhaps not but the F-35 has some (if not the) best jamming systems on Earth. The magazine is called defense update and the kill rate for cruise missiles is .6-.9 percent but given that the JASSM-158 is equipped with stealth technology it probably has an even lower chance of impact

  • @1990PatMorrison

    Ah.. so I did find it, but its not "less then one half" as you previously stated but rather 0.6 to 0.9, its not percent, its probability, in percentage - 60-90% kill probability against precision guided munitions, NOT "less then one half". JASSM-158 will probably be difficult to track at long ranges, but at close ranges the missile is like all - vulnerable and due to its subsonic speeds, air defence systems will have alot of time to react and engage it.

  • @vtkrey well it was an aproximation based on the stealth capability but combined with the F-35's jammers it could render it useless

  • @1990PatMorrison

    You dont know that, simple presumption, and a biased one too, do you really believe that the Russians are sitting idle while US is developing new aircraft, missiles and jammers?

  • @vtkrey no, but does the Tor M1 use an AESA radar system? or the S-400?

  • @1990PatMorrison

    S-300/400 air defence battalions are accompanied by AESA radar systems, Tor-M1 systems use these radars while in a joint air defence network, which they are when protecting S-300/400 sites.

  • @vtkrey perhaps but there is still 1 option, use the radar horizon to get close enough to fire an AARAM missile which cannot be intercepted

  • @1990PatMorrison

    AARAM? or do you mean AMRAAM? in which case - why cannot it be intercepted?

  • @vtkrey too small and to fast for a majority intercept probability

  • @1990PatMorrison

    It is over 3.5m long, which is pretty large, definately large enough for an interception and speed will probably not be an issue as the Tor air defence system can engage targets traveling at speeds of 0.7km/sec.

  • @vtkrey the AMRAAM goes over M 1.3

  • @1990PatMorrison

    Mach(?)1.3 is well under 500m/sec, which is within the engagement speed of the Tor air defence system, I do not see why the interception probability would decrease.

  • @vtkrey sorry 1.3 km/s

  • @1990PatMorrison

    Mach 4 at low altitude?, I highly doubt it, infact, AMRAAM is listed as Mach 4 capable, so this is the maximum achievable speed for the rocket motor, certainly not at low altitude, not even close.

  • @vtkrey true but the Tor faces the same speed reduction problems as the AMRAAM

  • @1990PatMorrison

    Yes, but the two missiles are designed differently to suit their roles.

    AAM rocket motors are generally designed for a long sustained burn times under lower drag conditions, reducing fuel consumption and so increasing range.

    SAMs (especially short range ones) have quick burning rocket motors, these are designed for rapid acceleration and very high energy output, to deal with immense drag experienced at low altitudes.

  • @vtkrey perhaps but it's still much faster and smaller than any cruise missile so the probability of intercept is still going to be much lower than 60%

  • @1990PatMorrison

    The listed 60-90% kill probability is not only against cruise missiles but also against PGMs.

  • @vtkrey where's your source for that?

  • @1990PatMorrison

    My source for that is the source you yourself provided - defence update magazine.

  • @vtkrey PGMs are smart bombs, not missiles

  • @1990PatMorrison

    Whats your point?

  • @vtkrey my point is it will be way harder to intercept a bomb than a supersonic missile

  • @1990PatMorrison

    well, in that case, the reported kill probability against cruise missiles and PGMs is 60%-90%, and going by what you stated, the kill probability must be even higher against supersonic missiles, since they are easier to intercept according to you...

  • @vtkrey woops sorry, I was so busy last week I was hasty in writing my comments, I meant the other way arround

  • @1990PatMorrison

    I very much doubt it, the system was especially designed for this purpose and if it cannot effectivelly carry it out, it would be, well... useless, right?, but it was mass produced and recieved major upgrades several times, tested many times against varieties of targets, including cruise missiles, drones and precision guided weapons and nothing indictes the system is ineffective, so this argument about effectivness of the system against supersonic missiles reached a stalemate.

  • @vtkrey no, it's only common sense that faster. smaller targets will be harder to intercept

  • @1990PatMorrison

    That would be true, if a comparison was being done against targets the Tor system was designed to intercept and targets it was able to intercept without the initial design requirement to do so, this is however irrelevent as these faster, smaller missiles you mention were exactly what the Tor system was designed to intercept.

  • @vtkrey No it was designed to intercept cruise missiles, bombs an UAVs, but even if that is true it would still have a lower probability of intercept. By that logic a sniper rifle would have a lower chance of hitting a target at short range.

  • @1990PatMorrison

    No, aircraft, cruise missiles, UAVs and precision guided weapons, which includes both guided missiles and bombs.

    Your understanding is incorrect, hence why your example is irrelevent, the missiles Tor air defence system uses are proximity fused, therefore size of the target is not as important factor.

  • @vtkrey the but the speed is still decisive. It will be much harder to nail that than a cruise missile. You asked me for a source, but nowhere did I see it was capable of intercepting an AMRAAM class missile and if size wasn't a factor than the probability of hitting an aircraft would be lower than a cruise missile, yet it is higher. nice try though

  • @1990PatMorrison

    Dont put words in my mouth, I didnt say that size isnt a factor, I said, its not as important factor!

    watch?v=BTAsOAdcg00

  • @vtkrey PGMs are smart bombs

  • @vtkrey and even so it could be jammed

  • All this black-project talk is utterly stupid. The US army likes to boast about the latest technologies they have invented before they are even ready. If they had antigravity engines or a prototype of even a generator for something like the HAARP, you'd see it in all the newspapers. No, the best thing the have managed to produce so far is the F-22, and it's so expensive it got cut. In Russia, we build crap, but at least it's cheap crap.

  • So that was responsible fotr katrina? lol. or was powerless to prevent it. Tornados accross the us were its doing too. Facts on the ground do not support its GIjoe esque weather dominator abilities although im sure it affects things. Point is if it did all that the reality of the world would be different.

  • @solarnight25 hurricane Katrina was in 2005, back then HAARP IRI wasnt capable and powerfull enough to manipulate the ionosphere to alternate the wheater. It was stil in development stage until 2007 when final IRI was completed.

  • @skydreamerXIII :: Google "RUSSIAN SCALAR WEAPONS" before running your mouth!!! Haarp is just another pathetic american attempt to catch up with superior Russian Tesla tech .The Russians have had those weapons since the 1960s.

    And also google how Russian scaler weapons destroyed the challenger shuttle and the "USS threaher" Submarine .Haarp is useless against Russia's Scalar tech.