In the very near future you will see a virtual cornucopia of "leading personalities" dying or leaving their "positions", becoming obscure. They are being...."eliminated". Why?
This is, in essence, a repeat of fascist history, We are experiencing a more protracted "night of the long knives" - the elimination of those in the public eye who are known to object to the NWO fascism.
Expect "suicides", plane crashes, car crashes & unexplained outright murder.
Give me a fucking break. Like the big bad government wants to watch you sitting in your underwear, eating Cheatos and masturbating to pictures of Britney Spears. (Wash off that Cheatos dust, or the spies might start calling you 'Carrot Man.')
Of course there's no cam. But dtv absolutely sends/receives. There's remote electronic registration, even automated firmware updates. Every member of a family can easily be profiled. Not only by what they choose to watch, but what they choose not to watch on the alternate channels. Think about it. Even with only five simultaneous choices of completely different veins, each one appealing to specific political, spiritual, or personality characteristics. It speaks volumes about each of us.
This would be illegal so they couldn't use it to convict you, they can't show the recordings to anyone publicly, they can't arrest you from it.
Where they going to store all this useless data? How do they transmit it? What if there is no power to the TV? How do they know who has what device? Who is going to wade through millions upon million of hours of recordings in hopes to see, what?
Do i dispute the technology exists? No of course not. I just don't see how it can be practical.
@lotek72 Are you suggesting that if they are doing this and the Patriot Act allows them to use this (which it DOESN'T) that it isn't going to blow the lid off the whole thing?
Besides, America is not the ONLY country in the world. Come to think of it, how many TV's, STB's and other electronic equipment is manufactured in the US anyway? Do they import the device and then ZE NSA adds the camera's and mic's before going to retail?
What about the other points i made? What about the logistics?
You're suggesting that they could project images in to our rooms via the TV? Don't you think sooner or later someone would figure out the TV is responsible? Then what, "they" are caught out aren't they? Imagine the law suits electronic manufacturers would open themselves up to if they did this.
Let's assume they are doing the camera thing, well what they going to do? Sit and watch ALL OF US, 24/7? Who they going to get to do all this watching? What could they do with any of it anyway?
Any receiver can act as a transmitter...even nixon when in office tried to have a 'camera' in every tv-that was then,now they do.The human body is also a receiver/transmitter.Any wave can act as a carrier wave, also adding other 'packets' they want delivered.The flicker screens will trance many out, making many more suggestible.xbox, kinect, PS2 etc all are set up for this-not the gaming many think...the digital box vouchers to observe all data-they get massive biometrics from them.SERIOUSLY
I rarely watch tv at all-when I use the box it is to watch dvds or a selected movie through netflix or something-I limit my time as I am well aware of the entrainment they foist upon all who watch. Research Dr Jose Delgado, or Col Michael Aquino and his paper called "mindwars"...he was at one time in charge of the psy ops...he is also married to a self proclaimed vampire...runs the temple of set and use to be big cheese in military-a satanist I believe...these are the people who wrote playbook
digital tv along side with micro$oft xbox that can scan a human, get its body weight, height, scan the retina, stream live video and sound, etc..just imagine...we were warned many times about this shit..
These Programs come MILITARY PsyOps see marsboy683 channel also Releases Endorphins in BRAIN=ADDICTION keeps you from talking about important things like RAT POISON in Water,Soft Drinks etc see films at wwwFLUORIDEACTIONnet,
thank you for sharing this video. even if there is no conspiracy theory come true the concept of this tech and what it can do is frightening and very invasive of someones privacy. but im wondering... when the pixel image recievers have picked up the image how is it transmitted back to wherever the signal came from. i know it may be by ariel but what of laptops how is their image transmitted back? through broadband or through the air? i dont mean to be ungratefull for your help but im curious
@rgrgrgrob I'm no engineer, but I'm told that anything that can recieve a signal can also be used to transmit a signal as well. hope this helps. Don't trust ANYTHING the government tells you - they LIE !
@hunter69denys Same here, I am no engineer yet I am wanting to debate this issue so I may learn more. Agreed, rgrgrgrob should not count this out as "no conspiracy theory come true". High tech surveilance teams have listening devices the size of a button, so if their frequency can be intercepted, so could other frequencies. I would really like to test just how many watts are truely being used for video converters and test more than one area of the converter box, just to be sure.
You mentioned earlier that sending a transmission would also be a problem due to lack of watts needed. Yet lets look how listening devices(bugs the size of a button )work and are able to transmit a radio wave frequency. Now, if they have a device that is able to pick up radio frequency(em waves), what is stopping them from doing the same in a room, yet this time using a higher frequency of em waves. Now lets look at how active sonar works. Do you see the possibilities now?
Another great information source on Youtube, however it comes with music also. Have you guys considered that the music can be a distraction to message you are trying to share? Possibly turn the music down to help we, the viewers, focus on what you want to share.
You are not being clear about your projector theory, I don't see the evil in having a projector in my room. This is extreme. People need to calm down a little. The only way this blows my mind is by how much junk I see on YouTube
well i thought puting electric tape over the senser that picks up signals frome the remote would work but noooo welll i got another idea i will set up a two way mirror infront of the tv i can still watch the tv but the government cant watch me!!! and if that fells i will destroy ever tv in my house and watch tv on my desktop cumputer
Think about this-In digital, signal goes both ways-EX.-Your mp3 player uses the same usb jack, to upload AND download information. A tv screen "could" be used as a camera (input) as well as show a movie (output)---
Just because a patent exists for this does not mean it has sinister roots or purposes. I have worked for the largest consumer electronics manufacturers in the world and they patent and experiment with lots of ideas. Usually it is to offer features and gimmicks that would allow them to outsell their competitors. Think about it. What's coming out of your TV right now and for the last 60 years is much more sinister than anything that might go into your TV from your private lives.
I looke dup the patent,,,it pretty much says the tv will show the image and also be the camara and reciever as well as transmitter. It is several years old already.
@vetttech1999 which it means that they have the picture of your naked mom...a bad joke men..but that's why I have not tv........wonder if they can see me hrought the laptp
If you have to have a TV set in every room then you are the dummy! It makes only sense to track moves of critical people and they will not have that in every room! Only the conditionedm brainwashed sheeple will have that and there is no merit in watching them!
Haha, what a load of shit, that technology is probably just the future of video calling and as for projecting sentient beings, how about projecting pornos into your front room, 'shit hot I say'.
@SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 Remember once an infrastructure is in place it basically costs nothing to use so they may be wasting time but nooooot moooooolaaaaaaa :))
@Ph4ntom74 , yep! 2 drones,.. over my house every day! very excessive! lol,. if I had a box or a t.v. maybe? and of course I won't support people I don't trust,.. so NO TAXES! :0) you? now if they are spying on me in other ways then maybe I'm paying for it? hard to say.
@SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 i understand your point, but in any thing you buy you are paying taxes buddy. you might not pay direct taxes as everyone should do, but we are always working for them. it's their system not ours, there is no escape. the only thing to do is to dethrone them all around the world. unfortunately i have to pay taxes because i do not live in a country of the common wealth, i live under Roman Civil Law, we are slaves in every aspect and there is no law to protect us ...
The anti-christ will be revealed on our screens, he will appear as the angel of light, the most amazing sight any human will have seen!
They are also working on his entry down to earth from the sky...it will be a massive illusion using holograms...unlike GOD, satan can only be in one place at a time.
satan hates you, thats why he tells you God does not exist. Everyone knows in their heart who their creator is...
u guys will luagh but do u know where i heard of this kind of thing first??? Universal studios, when i was a kid in the 90s, yes since the 90s, on the Terminator Ride, there were tube TV's where u wait in line on the walls talking about how Cybertron(or what'ever the company was in the movie) was trying to watch u through ur television tube. SINCE THE 90S.. duno if thats still up there...
ha ha weird stuffs been happening since i was a kid, 1970s80s. etc,. lol i remember when we went to war with Irac , thinking middle east, great strategic point. if you play risk try it.
Simple, Dont watch TV. DON'T connect to a cable box, satellite, aerial etc.
If you must watch something then use optical media or download & place them on DVD's and then watch them that way without having to receive transmissions.
My TV isn't plugged into anything except my Xbox360 & PC Graphics card HDMI output (as a secondary monitor) even with this I feel it is compromised.
No digital TV for me thank you, but then I have not watched a broadcast transmission in 6+ years.
Of course doing this wont guarantee any image capture cant be transmitted (wireless technology is WAY beyond what we are aware of) and also you still have the subliminal bombardment that's prevalent in so much media these days.
On second thought's just pick up a book and/or go chill in the sun, if its winter then go make a snowman or have a snowball fight like back in the days, if it's rainy then sheeeit go all Gene Kelly lol.
Seriously forewarned is forearmed, good upload also by the way :)
@Zenman1976 You're a fucking faggot. How can these DTV boxes get the alleged video transmitted back to the US government? They can't because they have no internet connection or 1,000,000 gigawatt antenna out connection that is 5,000 feet tall. I can see you and a bunch of other conspiracy theorists in a mental hospital one day where you belong.
@coffeeandsugar20 responding to a 1 year old statement in such an angered way. Speak volumes about your personality. People like you are beyond all help. A shining example of the kind of self-righteous arrogant scum your country has become famous for. When my kind finally get to the nuthouse I'll be sure to drop by your room for a game of chess & to recieve the proper orientation. Until then, feel free to waste more time with your bile over an outdated comment, you moronic over-reactive cunt.
@Zenman1976 But let me tell you something when I make claims about this kind of stuff with 7+ years electronics experience, and these claims are challenged by no one other but nostradamus theorists who believe everything they hear, that just annoys the hell out of me.
@coffeeandsugar20 you are presumptuous to the extreme and think the best way to disagree is by offering insults as a starting point.. Hardly indicitive of a sound mind. In fact its EXACTLY the kind of prevelent attitude thats assisting in this rot & decay of society. And if your outlook is no different than mine then you're just proving what kind of jackass you are all the more. Your 7+ years dont mean shit to me & nobody even mentioned nostradamus MORE presumption. Take a chill pill & FUCK OFF
@coffeeandsugar20 No I just have no tolerance for retarded jackasses who open an argument or debate with insults and I am more than willing to offer a few back in kind to such dickheads. Anyone who wants a rational debate will get one, frankly I wasted more than enough words on you considering your adopted approach.. Grow up, maybe then you will learn something rather than just always considering yourself as an authority to such a point that belittling others becomes a default option.
@coffeeandsugar20 And Cameron much like Obama and all the cunts before them have poisoned many things in life. You see paradox cause your fuckin ignorant.. You see madness cause you seem to live in anger.
I may retort in this manner but I NEVER approach people in such a way. I got enough self respect to at least try & initiate a mature and considered approach but I aint the type to lay down when someone comes at me in a way I consider hostile and stunted. In such times I'll give it right back.
@Zenman1976 I don't live in anger, thanks. I know going off at you was wrong now, and for that I'm sorry. But the point is, you need to base claims like THIS based on experience with electronics. NOT what your schizophrenia tells you.
You know they can send the internet through electriciy cables, direct sound into a small area so its booming in one spot & deathly quiet 2 paces away & many similar crazy thing these days. Its the 21st century you know. Outside of the fact we've no idea what technology is "out there" that we have no idea about your attitude is idiotic. Any form of digital transmission can be converted and "sent home" without the need for HUGE transmitters and aerials, lol what you think this is the 1940s.
@Zenman1976 Xbox? man...you should check out project natal from micro$soft...watch this and tell me if you can see what i am seeing: watch?v=p2qlHoxPioM
hi my name is rob and im 17 you know them cameras in converter boxes and lcd t.vs where does the cameras transmit the pictures to. the goverment? and how are the pictures transmitted to them? please help as im confused :S
NSA , and all Age... try to make virtual human home, like google earth, ,,well solution??? any?? put filter flex is lose the contr... but its work, any plug , network, cable, web, is danger ! hack them
i was always suspect of this when i heard its law to have these damn boxes i was telling people something is up there is no real reason we have to do this but thanks for opening my eyes even more
...A large LCD screen filled with image sensors would be ideal for videoconferencing." So anyway...it's up to each one of us as to what we will allow ourselves to believe. As Dennis Miller said about APATHY..." The biggest conspiracy has always been the fact that there is no conspiracy. Nobody's out to get you. Nobody gives a shit whether you live or die. There, you feel better now?"
What did Walter Truett Anderson say about responsibility? "Our lives improve only when we take chances -- and the first and most difficult risk we can take is to be honest with ourselves." So if one checks the NS website it says..." The clever idea is to insert thousands of microscopic image sensors in-between the liquid crystal display cells in the screen. Each sensor captures its own small image, but software stitches these together to create a single, larger picture. Continued...
DTV is not required. They have had the ability to deeply intrude into your home through the hellevision box since at least the early 90's & with 80's TV sets
As for projecting an image into your room, again, 90's with 80's TV set, the regular programming image suddenly became a black screen which split vertically down the center from where there came protruding outward a bright white light in abstract, asymmetrical, 3 dimensional form. It was light with a form that protruded approx 1.5-2 ft out
thanks for eduacating me my freind ,i,ll be passing this message around be sure of that,maybe its not the right time to trash ur old tvs and moniters??
good research my friend. i had missed checking new patents. project bluebeam baby. its all part of agenda 21. the race is on. everyone should forget what they know about technology.
Patent # 20060007222? That alone debunks any theory. Patents are only up to about 8,000,000 right now. I also noticed the docs were small, and only parts you want to show were legible.
The DTV conversion is to simply free up bandwidth, because all the usable bandwidth is gone. They will recover channels 52-69, and I believe 2-6. That's all there was to it. The idea of HDTV was in the works since 1975, and arrived to what we have now in 1997.
You are correct, it's not a patent, it's a patent application. It,however, does not mean the technology is invalid.
I only show portions of documents. I provide the links, in this case, link to the patent app. so that viewers can read the entire patent on their own. It is not my job to educate. My goal is to try to make people think, and provide links to documents that helped me form my decision.
whether someone reads the info, that's another story.
If they DID put cameras into displays, the cost of a TV would be about $750,000, with a 50% cut for bulk cameras.
Then again, the only feasable way is a single-cell photosensor, but unless your face is right on the screen, all it'll see is a single color (the whole array). It needs a method to focus light, and with autofocus, and adjustment mechanicals, it's too overpriced. If the Conspiracy Theorists want to run with this, the only option would be a single camera in the TV somewhere.
@georgef551 Nice try at disinforming people. Feel free to show your private life if you are so head strong against the possibility. FYI, electronic engineers can and do make infrared recievers that can bounce light into a room that is then sent back and converted into pixel values. Instead of just denying the info, go and get an education on how this technology truely works.
@georgef551 Oh that is right, you can't prove me wrong because a patent exists to show the technology is already out there. Like I said, get an education on how this technology truely works, until then....
@georgef551 Wow you sure were fast on recieving an education on how this actually works. I agree, the patent info is proving to be fake, that is what you call disinformation to make it look fake. Yet I give you credit for pointing that out. How ever you still did not prove my origional comment as false. Do you know how digital cameras work, once you find out, apply that technology to the fuction of an infrared reciever and tell me what you see similar.
Camera need a lens in order to train light onto a sensor, even a pinhole works. Problem is, the theory posted simply has a sensor, meaning it'll just receive the average light info from whatever hits it. Then, you would have to add a lens to target light. At this point, the FOV is too narrow, so you make the image "fish-eye" to see more. The array will fail, because none of the edges will allign, and you get the average light blob yet again.
@georgef551 You never answered my question, if anything you are stating how infrared recievers and digital cameras sold on the market are different, I asked how are they the same. An infrared reciever can obtain the non visible light emitted into a room, much like the process of how a digital camera emits light. The infrared reciever has the capability to recieve light then translate it into binary data that is then processed through a micro processor(no lense needed).
@georgef551 Or unless it also has thermal capabilities and or infrared. The light is still CAPTURED by a digital sensor array. You sure have your panties in a bunch for someone who finds himself winning. You see I am trying to get you to find the similarities and all you keep doing is finding differences, then throw in an insult to make yourself feel better. George, lets not get rude here, lets see if there are similarities between digital cameras and infrared recievers.
@georgef551 I will kindly answere my own question for you George. The thing they have in common is the ability to read Electromagnetics. Now George, is it not possible that the infrared reciever could be designed to convert all the electromagnetics in its sensor range, of all the objects in a room, seeing how all objects have an electromagnetic field? Now tell me again that its not possible to have Optics with no lens.
I hate to tell this to you, but not everything has an electromagnetic field, and if so, they're so tiny, the most sensitive of equipment cannot pick them up. Again, these waves would have to be pinpointed onto a sensor. Just hitting them would give an average in the space, not an image.
@georgef551 You may want to go back to physics 101,Electromagnetic fields can exist in anything with molecules, and yes we as humans do give off an electromagnetic field.You are right, some objects give off less of a magnetic field, which only proves my point that you would contrast greatly with your couch. lol No, the waves would not have to be pin pointed, it just has to be in the field of the infrared recievers eye.
@georgef551 "the most sensitive of equipment cannot pick them up." I hate to tell you this, but yes a magnetometer is sensitive enough, so sorry to break it to you, the technology exists.
Again, you got one sensor picking it up, asd in, one pixel. If there is an array, and there is a focused image on the sensor array, all you'd either get is a 3D polygon image, or possibly a grayscale image.
At this point, if a usable image is obtainable, my argument of size versus ability repeats at the beginning, making this a closed loop, with you stuck inside, being unable to pinpoint the feasibility of this concept in a $1,500 TV.
@georgef551 Again you have an infrared sensor that is already built to recieve information via electromagnetics/light, then you have objects which are in the room that give off a different spectrum of electromagnetics, which is then recieved by the eye of the infrared reciever. Nice double talk by the way.
@georgef551 Since I was never in a closed loop to begin with: I do believe you are assuming it works in one direction. But nice try.
Have you ever heard of bouncing transmissions? Now I know you are talking out of your ass. I guess your job is to disinform and discredit. You are doing terrible.
@georgef551 "(is that a word??)" Yes they both are words. The transmission bounces back using your own satellite, what the hell else do you think I meant? Now you are just playing dumb.
Do you know that it'll take quite a bit of horsepower to sucessfully transmit a signal back to the satellite? A 100-watt TV can't do it. Sure, it could make it, but it's drowned out by similar frequencies that are thousands of times stronger.
There's a reason why stations have HUGE dishes to send the signals to the satellites.
@georgef551 " , to beam back anything to a communications device at the point of original transmission." Who said anything about it going back to the point of origional transmission?
@georgef551 I have a test I want you to do for me, and then maybe you can answere why this happens. PAINT OVER THE EYE OF THE INFRARED RECIEVER, NOTICE YOU WILL LOSE YOUR SIGNAL WITH YOUR SATELLITE OR DIGITAL TV PROVIDER, THEN REMOVE THE WET PAINT AND NOTICE HOW EVERTHING WORKS FINE AGAIN. I did this twice, and the same thing happened. You seem to think you know so much much, so maybe you can explain why something like this would happen.
Of course that will work, because it's a SINGLE SENSOR looking for an infared signal. If the average color has the infared, the TV will pick it up. WHY do they tell you in the instructions that using it in bright flourescent lights, or sunlight, will hinder or render the remote useless? The average light the sensor sees will mostly be that, not the remote. Again, signal drown-out.
You say you know what you're talking about. I've built cameras and IR sensors before.
@georgef551 It didn't just render the remote useless, it rendered the entire system useless. Proving you did not even try the test I aked you to and no that was not a good explanation that you gave. ". I've built cameras and IR sensors before." Good for you.
Not only do you not get basic technology, you can't read either. I get the fact the system doesn't work if the path is blocked, but the problem with this concept is it's a SINGLE PIXEL of information. You can't beam in images that way.
PS: If they can do this, it won't work on me anyhow. My reception is OTA. Good luck with that.
@georgef551 Not only are your insults wrong, yet so are your explanations. Painting over the infrared recievers eye should just stop the usage of the remote, for the system is recieving its transmission via coaxial or fibre optic cable. In spain Optics Research Team at UJI, developed a single pixel that could take high quality images(GO FIGURE).
p.s. "if they can do this"? What ever happened to your absolute refusal to this being possible?
A 1x1 sensor can't make images, just a simgle color. It's not possible to make an image from it. The sensor would need a lens (again), and would have to physically scan to make an image, to the point the cost is not feasable whatsoever.
It just cannot be done, not at a price the consumer can afford.
What comes closest to this are laser projectors. The optic system used isn't cheap.
@georgef551 WRONG, google "SINGLE PIXEL CAMERA CAPTURES HIGH QUALITY ENCRYPTED IMAGES" by Bridgett Borgobello, IT IS POSSIBLE, now you are just in denial after I gave you a link to the FACT that the technology exists. Now your only excuse is price, lol.
@georgef551 Funny (note the Rice Research team also made a single pixel camera) Feel free to contact both Research teams for more info. Yet lets not get off topic, tell me why the entire video converter shut down when I painted over the eye of the infrared reciever? The box should still work, for it is still plugged into the cable that is patched into my satellite dish? The only thing that should stop working is the remote controle. Quit running away from this question.
I've covered the remote sensor with my finger on others, and they still worked. You were limited to the basic functions the front panel buttons allowed.
@georgef551 My box works fine, I too tried my finger and nothing happened, it was only until I covered it with thick oil paint(blocking out all light). Then I removed the paint and it worked 100%fine. I did this twice with the exact same results. I was not limited to the basic functions of the up or down button changer on the box itself, for they had no function either. I had the Bell 4200 box.
Most boxes do things like that, because of piracy. It's assuming the mod (black paint over IR sensor) was an attempt to override locks, even if it's some camera, if it exists.
@georgef551 I agree it is odd. When I asked Bell why this would happen, they were more concerned that I opened up the box to begin with and gave no valid answere as to why the entire system stopped working. What ever the case, my satellite signal was blocked until the paint was removed. No screen error message, just a blank screen. Blocking out the light to an IR sensor is in no way an attempt to override locks, nor does it make sense that such a function was installed on the IR sensor.
I think they're trying to prevent any tampering. If the whole system "fails", it protects copyrights of digital media companies. Dumb as it is, it was pure assumption of tampering.
@georgef551 Can you say that is the reason with no doubt in mind? Why would blocking out the light to an IR sensor be detected as an assumption of tampering? It is no different than sticking your finger over it, the paint is just better at it, so why would it not sense the lack of light with your finger aswell?
Almost the same. There's some light getting through your finger it can see.
Manufacturers do some really odd things to try and keep thier equipment original. Any tampering yields loss of function sometimes. Some things are just silly to render a disabling.
@georgef551 That is what I still find fishy, they must have had reason for it to shut down by means of blocking out all light, I just can't buy your theory as an absolute. I don't really call blocking the light to the infrared sensor as tampering.
I agree with that, but with the challenges of copyright with digital media, I think manufacturers are doing anything to prevent theft. The system probably assumed it was tampered, and to protect the company, simply shuts it down. Overkill response.
I agree - but people are so dumb that they think the best technology is the stuff we buy in the high streets.............because they don't understand it they insist it doesn't exist.
don't waste time searching for a silly camera in your tv. this is just blinding you to the REAL reason for this new digital transition. it is nothing other than to UNITE THE PEOPLE OF THE ENTIRE WORLD! A WAY FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDER "GOVT" TO BE ABLE TO REACH & CONTROL ALL OF US!
starts as a great new technolgy. example, the entire world now watches American idol "together" & now the entire WORLD can call in their votes. a way to unite the world. next thing we know, we are sitting in front of our tv's with the ANTICHRIST SPEAKING & REACHING THE ENTIRE WORLD IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER! it is sooo incredibly obvious what & why they are doing this! the govt is practically bending over backwards to see that this reaches all homes!
this is so very wrong. the entire reason for Digital TV Transition, is point blank simply a way to unite the entire world for a ONE WORLD GOVT status. it is a way for the one world/new world order govt to be able to reach ALL PEOPLE in real time.
My TV is always on in my home because of my older brother once he moves out I'm throwing that big boy in the trash he better take it with him lol...I always say that after a while of the TV being on I get such bad migraines...hmmm I wonder why >.>
I had new LCD TV's for 2 yrs and I always thought something was up with the whole forced digital conversion BS. I just didn't know how they were going to do it. I even used to block the entire screen. I knew something was amiss!!
wow great video. this technology can project an angel into the house of a christian and make that angel tell that christian that jesus has come. Perfect tool for project bluebeam(the false rapture in which millions of believers will be vaporized by a high energy space based weapon).
Ooookay, did anyone notice to the right hand side of this page an ad for AT&T that states, "AT&T ADVANCE TV CAN HELP PREPARE YOU THE TRANSITION. LEARN MORE"? Or is it just my screen that says this?
Ya it is interesting 'cause now it says "There's a New Way to Expericence TV That Just Might Blow Your Mind"! My goodness they just announce the shit right in front of your face like you're an idiot!
Wow... I use Firefox and added the AdBlock Add On which let's me block all ads.. I also use Flash Block so nothing runs (including these videos) unless I click on it.
I heard that the dtv converter boxes also send out advanced mind control signal technology to control your thoughts and emotions. we should all flip off our tv screens and mouth the words, "eat shit" and "fuck you" on occasion just to piss Big Bro off!XD
1984 is a fictional novel that discusses this technology and others as a "Big Brother" conspiracy. The crazy part is that within the story, the TV can be off, but the "camera screen" stays on and continues to watch the surroundings. If you cover the tv with a blanket, the cops might come to your house lol.
There is no need for cameras within digital boxes, I think that there is something dark as to why they want this device to go on the market.
I have actually seen this type of thing with my computer screen-old type not lcd. I bought some toy a few years back and the instructions to activate it were to hold it up to my computer monitor to scan the bar code on the toy-I did and it did (it read the toy THROUGH MY MONITOR), through the monitor it read the bar code on the toy. If I still have the item and can find it I will come back and reply to this post exactly what the toy was and where it came from and who manufactured it.
wait are u talking about that little Pocket LCD toy? The one where u scan bar codes and it creates little black and white LCD monsters based on the bar codes? Is that what u mean? Cuz that was only for bar code scanning of the bar codes on products we buy or products in supermarkets...i don't recall the ad saying the moniter..
Is it what in legal terms called "trespassing"?
Is anyone already experienced this technology in "action"?
siberianasket 1 month ago
20060007222 met 3M Post its !
unionationow 3 months ago
Shit is crazy. Chec out this new site I came across @ MYWAKEUP (dot) INFO
It has a bunch of interesting videos.
KasedMonster 3 months ago
Nice video.
Well listen, You can lead a horse to water, but you can't make em drink it.
Translated means. Americans will never listen until it's too late. then they scream bloody murder.
Cause some are stupid, Some are fools, Some are to busy, And many are a part of this conception to dominate the world.
dog eat dog world BTW.
Snowman374th 3 months ago
In the very near future you will see a virtual cornucopia of "leading personalities" dying or leaving their "positions", becoming obscure. They are being...."eliminated". Why?
This is, in essence, a repeat of fascist history, We are experiencing a more protracted "night of the long knives" - the elimination of those in the public eye who are known to object to the NWO fascism.
Expect "suicides", plane crashes, car crashes & unexplained outright murder.
The WAY they do 'business" has changed!
t4705mb6 4 months ago
Give me a fucking break. Like the big bad government wants to watch you sitting in your underwear, eating Cheatos and masturbating to pictures of Britney Spears. (Wash off that Cheatos dust, or the spies might start calling you 'Carrot Man.')
DevSodDribble 5 months ago
Of course there's no cam. But dtv absolutely sends/receives. There's remote electronic registration, even automated firmware updates. Every member of a family can easily be profiled. Not only by what they choose to watch, but what they choose not to watch on the alternate channels. Think about it. Even with only five simultaneous choices of completely different veins, each one appealing to specific political, spiritual, or personality characteristics. It speaks volumes about each of us.
johnnyfuxtik 6 months ago
The person who made this video is an engineer, OF COURSE THEY ARE. Just like the UFO and alien video makes are ex intelligence agents.
Sozlled 6 months ago
This would be illegal so they couldn't use it to convict you, they can't show the recordings to anyone publicly, they can't arrest you from it.
Where they going to store all this useless data? How do they transmit it? What if there is no power to the TV? How do they know who has what device? Who is going to wade through millions upon million of hours of recordings in hopes to see, what?
Do i dispute the technology exists? No of course not. I just don't see how it can be practical.
Sozlled 6 months ago
@Sozlled Patriot Act big dawg, try again. Thank Obama for extending it too.
lotek72 6 months ago
@lotek72 Are you suggesting that if they are doing this and the Patriot Act allows them to use this (which it DOESN'T) that it isn't going to blow the lid off the whole thing?
Besides, America is not the ONLY country in the world. Come to think of it, how many TV's, STB's and other electronic equipment is manufactured in the US anyway? Do they import the device and then ZE NSA adds the camera's and mic's before going to retail?
What about the other points i made? What about the logistics?
Sozlled 6 months ago
You're suggesting that they could project images in to our rooms via the TV? Don't you think sooner or later someone would figure out the TV is responsible? Then what, "they" are caught out aren't they? Imagine the law suits electronic manufacturers would open themselves up to if they did this.
Let's assume they are doing the camera thing, well what they going to do? Sit and watch ALL OF US, 24/7? Who they going to get to do all this watching? What could they do with any of it anyway?
Sozlled 6 months ago
Comment removed
Sozlled 6 months ago
is there a way to remove this and is it still operational while the tv is switched off?
cvetanka777 7 months ago
Any receiver can act as a transmitter...even nixon when in office tried to have a 'camera' in every tv-that was then,now they do.The human body is also a receiver/transmitter.Any wave can act as a carrier wave, also adding other 'packets' they want delivered.The flicker screens will trance many out, making many more suggestible.xbox, kinect, PS2 etc all are set up for this-not the gaming many think...the digital box vouchers to observe all data-they get massive biometrics from them.SERIOUSLY
Giverney13 7 months ago
I rarely watch tv at all-when I use the box it is to watch dvds or a selected movie through netflix or something-I limit my time as I am well aware of the entrainment they foist upon all who watch. Research Dr Jose Delgado, or Col Michael Aquino and his paper called "mindwars"...he was at one time in charge of the psy ops...he is also married to a self proclaimed vampire...runs the temple of set and use to be big cheese in military-a satanist I believe...these are the people who wrote playbook
Giverney13 7 months ago
so older tv's are cool then??
MILLSPRO123 7 months ago
In the name of Jade Marcela . . . "pervert".
lazyfreedom98 7 months ago
so that's why they sent a signal that burned up my old tv
handydude6 8 months ago
digital tv along side with micro$oft xbox that can scan a human, get its body weight, height, scan the retina, stream live video and sound, etc..just imagine...we were warned many times about this shit..
Ph4ntom74 8 months ago
These Programs come MILITARY PsyOps see marsboy683 channel also Releases Endorphins in BRAIN=ADDICTION keeps you from talking about important things like RAT POISON in Water,Soft Drinks etc see films at wwwFLUORIDEACTIONnet,
deadadelta 8 months ago
thank you for sharing this video. even if there is no conspiracy theory come true the concept of this tech and what it can do is frightening and very invasive of someones privacy. but im wondering... when the pixel image recievers have picked up the image how is it transmitted back to wherever the signal came from. i know it may be by ariel but what of laptops how is their image transmitted back? through broadband or through the air? i dont mean to be ungratefull for your help but im curious
rgrgrgrob 8 months ago
@rgrgrgrob I'm no engineer, but I'm told that anything that can recieve a signal can also be used to transmit a signal as well. hope this helps. Don't trust ANYTHING the government tells you - they LIE !
hunter69denys 8 months ago
@hunter69denys Same here, I am no engineer yet I am wanting to debate this issue so I may learn more. Agreed, rgrgrgrob should not count this out as "no conspiracy theory come true". High tech surveilance teams have listening devices the size of a button, so if their frequency can be intercepted, so could other frequencies. I would really like to test just how many watts are truely being used for video converters and test more than one area of the converter box, just to be sure.
PackOfPeterJackson 8 months ago
You mentioned earlier that sending a transmission would also be a problem due to lack of watts needed. Yet lets look how listening devices(bugs the size of a button )work and are able to transmit a radio wave frequency. Now, if they have a device that is able to pick up radio frequency(em waves), what is stopping them from doing the same in a room, yet this time using a higher frequency of em waves. Now lets look at how active sonar works. Do you see the possibilities now?
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
yet another great example of our tax dollars being used against us
guevodeplomo 9 months ago
Another great information source on Youtube, however it comes with music also. Have you guys considered that the music can be a distraction to message you are trying to share? Possibly turn the music down to help we, the viewers, focus on what you want to share.
CheezWizard01 10 months ago
spend time thinking instead infron of the T.V.
MrDecal 11 months ago
Great Song!Where can i find it online?Glad you posted it.Brainy,Brainman Media
brainman214 1 year ago
You are not being clear about your projector theory, I don't see the evil in having a projector in my room. This is extreme. People need to calm down a little. The only way this blows my mind is by how much junk I see on YouTube
nathanfjohnson 1 year ago
What? What does hat mean?
beethovennumbernine 1 year ago
@SonsOfLiberty1765 If you can send me some videos. I would like to see how this technology works if it is real.
pidos847 1 year ago
well i thought puting electric tape over the senser that picks up signals frome the remote would work but noooo welll i got another idea i will set up a two way mirror infront of the tv i can still watch the tv but the government cant watch me!!! and if that fells i will destroy ever tv in my house and watch tv on my desktop cumputer
The2Wiredproductions 1 year ago
interesting but fiction.
Take apart a box and find the technology that actually sends "them" images and I'll be shocked. Until then.... it's just imagination.
planetdarwin 1 year ago
does this mean that we shouldnt be master*** in front of the t.v anymore?
Abrower223 1 year ago 12
@Abrower223 nah bro, bust a nut on the t.v screen, give them a fukin facial haha
infantry031 1 year ago
Jobs is a Hippie at heart, of course he doesn't like it
papifolks 1 year ago
i heard that cable does that by itself, it goes both ways over 20 years ago
hurchel 2 years ago
Think about this-In digital, signal goes both ways-EX.-Your mp3 player uses the same usb jack, to upload AND download information. A tv screen "could" be used as a camera (input) as well as show a movie (output)---
shotsxxx 2 years ago
Just because a patent exists for this does not mean it has sinister roots or purposes. I have worked for the largest consumer electronics manufacturers in the world and they patent and experiment with lots of ideas. Usually it is to offer features and gimmicks that would allow them to outsell their competitors. Think about it. What's coming out of your TV right now and for the last 60 years is much more sinister than anything that might go into your TV from your private lives.
GovtSlave 2 years ago
also, the electricity distribution network could be the mean of transmission for the images acquired by the screens (tv, pc monitor ...)
try to search for "electricity distribution network as a mean of communication"
crutzweiler 2 years ago
I looke dup the patent,,,it pretty much says the tv will show the image and also be the camara and reciever as well as transmitter. It is several years old already.
vetttech1999 2 years ago
@vetttech1999 which it means that they have the picture of your naked mom...a bad joke men..but that's why I have not tv........wonder if they can see me hrought the laptp
alfaandomega2 1 year ago
the revolution will be televised duh
thehorsemn1313 2 years ago
If you have to have a TV set in every room then you are the dummy! It makes only sense to track moves of critical people and they will not have that in every room! Only the conditionedm brainwashed sheeple will have that and there is no merit in watching them!
mszs 2 years ago
Haha, what a load of shit, that technology is probably just the future of video calling and as for projecting sentient beings, how about projecting pornos into your front room, 'shit hot I say'.
kopius 2 years ago
thats pure bullshit.
NOOBNUT08 2 years ago
you guys are sheep
Rook369 2 years ago
well they are waisting tons spying on me! poor fools.
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 2 years ago 16
@SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 Remember once an infrastructure is in place it basically costs nothing to use so they may be wasting time but nooooot moooooolaaaaaaa :))
TheMorbiousStone 8 months ago
@SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 no, your the one who´s paying for them to be spying on you!
Ph4ntom74 8 months ago
@Ph4ntom74 , yep! 2 drones,.. over my house every day! very excessive! lol,. if I had a box or a t.v. maybe? and of course I won't support people I don't trust,.. so NO TAXES! :0) you? now if they are spying on me in other ways then maybe I'm paying for it? hard to say.
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 8 months ago
@SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 i understand your point, but in any thing you buy you are paying taxes buddy. you might not pay direct taxes as everyone should do, but we are always working for them. it's their system not ours, there is no escape. the only thing to do is to dethrone them all around the world. unfortunately i have to pay taxes because i do not live in a country of the common wealth, i live under Roman Civil Law, we are slaves in every aspect and there is no law to protect us ...
Ph4ntom74 8 months ago
The anti-christ will be revealed on our screens, he will appear as the angel of light, the most amazing sight any human will have seen!
They are also working on his entry down to earth from the sky...it will be a massive illusion using holograms...unlike GOD, satan can only be in one place at a time.
satan hates you, thats why he tells you God does not exist. Everyone knows in their heart who their creator is...
The truth will set you free!!!
gariando 2 years ago 3
I thought this b4 the documentary - analog to digital peculiar as well - spy -big brother get a new hobby
Romovisque 2 years ago 4
u guys will luagh but do u know where i heard of this kind of thing first??? Universal studios, when i was a kid in the 90s, yes since the 90s, on the Terminator Ride, there were tube TV's where u wait in line on the walls talking about how Cybertron(or what'ever the company was in the movie) was trying to watch u through ur television tube. SINCE THE 90S.. duno if thats still up there...
True2TheBlueYoViGang 2 years ago 2
ha ha weird stuffs been happening since i was a kid, 1970s80s. etc,. lol i remember when we went to war with Irac , thinking middle east, great strategic point. if you play risk try it.
SPAGHETTIMONSTER1 2 years ago 2
Simple, Dont watch TV. DON'T connect to a cable box, satellite, aerial etc.
If you must watch something then use optical media or download & place them on DVD's and then watch them that way without having to receive transmissions.
My TV isn't plugged into anything except my Xbox360 & PC Graphics card HDMI output (as a secondary monitor) even with this I feel it is compromised.
No digital TV for me thank you, but then I have not watched a broadcast transmission in 6+ years.
Zenman1976 2 years ago 13
Of course doing this wont guarantee any image capture cant be transmitted (wireless technology is WAY beyond what we are aware of) and also you still have the subliminal bombardment that's prevalent in so much media these days.
On second thought's just pick up a book and/or go chill in the sun, if its winter then go make a snowman or have a snowball fight like back in the days, if it's rainy then sheeeit go all Gene Kelly lol.
Seriously forewarned is forearmed, good upload also by the way :)
Zenman1976 2 years ago 6
@Zenman1976 You're a fucking faggot. How can these DTV boxes get the alleged video transmitted back to the US government? They can't because they have no internet connection or 1,000,000 gigawatt antenna out connection that is 5,000 feet tall. I can see you and a bunch of other conspiracy theorists in a mental hospital one day where you belong.
coffeeandsugar20 10 months ago
@coffeeandsugar20 responding to a 1 year old statement in such an angered way. Speak volumes about your personality. People like you are beyond all help. A shining example of the kind of self-righteous arrogant scum your country has become famous for. When my kind finally get to the nuthouse I'll be sure to drop by your room for a game of chess & to recieve the proper orientation. Until then, feel free to waste more time with your bile over an outdated comment, you moronic over-reactive cunt.
Zenman1976 10 months ago
@Zenman1976 False. Your outlook on the US is no different than mine.
coffeeandsugar20 10 months ago
@Zenman1976 But let me tell you something when I make claims about this kind of stuff with 7+ years electronics experience, and these claims are challenged by no one other but nostradamus theorists who believe everything they hear, that just annoys the hell out of me.
coffeeandsugar20 10 months ago
@coffeeandsugar20 you are presumptuous to the extreme and think the best way to disagree is by offering insults as a starting point.. Hardly indicitive of a sound mind. In fact its EXACTLY the kind of prevelent attitude thats assisting in this rot & decay of society. And if your outlook is no different than mine then you're just proving what kind of jackass you are all the more. Your 7+ years dont mean shit to me & nobody even mentioned nostradamus MORE presumption. Take a chill pill & FUCK OFF
Zenman1976 10 months ago
@Zenman1976 "Take a chill pill & FUCK OFF"
Wow what a paradox. DId David Cameron poison your tea? Geez. Y u mad?
coffeeandsugar20 10 months ago
@coffeeandsugar20 No I just have no tolerance for retarded jackasses who open an argument or debate with insults and I am more than willing to offer a few back in kind to such dickheads. Anyone who wants a rational debate will get one, frankly I wasted more than enough words on you considering your adopted approach.. Grow up, maybe then you will learn something rather than just always considering yourself as an authority to such a point that belittling others becomes a default option.
Zenman1976 10 months ago
@coffeeandsugar20 And Cameron much like Obama and all the cunts before them have poisoned many things in life. You see paradox cause your fuckin ignorant.. You see madness cause you seem to live in anger.
I may retort in this manner but I NEVER approach people in such a way. I got enough self respect to at least try & initiate a mature and considered approach but I aint the type to lay down when someone comes at me in a way I consider hostile and stunted. In such times I'll give it right back.
Zenman1976 10 months ago
@Zenman1976 I don't live in anger, thanks. I know going off at you was wrong now, and for that I'm sorry. But the point is, you need to base claims like THIS based on experience with electronics. NOT what your schizophrenia tells you.
coffeeandsugar20 10 months ago
You know they can send the internet through electriciy cables, direct sound into a small area so its booming in one spot & deathly quiet 2 paces away & many similar crazy thing these days. Its the 21st century you know. Outside of the fact we've no idea what technology is "out there" that we have no idea about your attitude is idiotic. Any form of digital transmission can be converted and "sent home" without the need for HUGE transmitters and aerials, lol what you think this is the 1940s.
Zenman1976 10 months ago
@Zenman1976 Xbox? man...you should check out project natal from micro$soft...watch this and tell me if you can see what i am seeing: watch?v=p2qlHoxPioM
Ph4ntom74 8 months ago
hi my name is rob and im 17 you know them cameras in converter boxes and lcd t.vs where does the cameras transmit the pictures to. the goverment? and how are the pictures transmitted to them? please help as im confused :S
rgrgrgrob 2 years ago
The governments technology I would say is 100 years more ADVANCED than what we know.
mexicantoney 2 years ago 6
NSA , and all Age... try to make virtual human home, like google earth, ,,well solution??? any?? put filter flex is lose the contr... but its work, any plug , network, cable, web, is danger ! hack them
caesarvegastube 2 years ago
Just wondering. Can a computer monitor see in your home? I find the term monitor kind of suspicious.
thementalpatient2005 2 years ago 6
i was always suspect of this when i heard its law to have these damn boxes i was telling people something is up there is no real reason we have to do this but thanks for opening my eyes even more
theredinhuman 2 years ago 2
Thank you.
nwosigns 2 years ago
i had a strong intuition for many years that TVs are spy devices. someone said many years ago that older, analog TVs were receivers and transmitters.
mojokind13 2 years ago
...A large LCD screen filled with image sensors would be ideal for videoconferencing." So anyway...it's up to each one of us as to what we will allow ourselves to believe. As Dennis Miller said about APATHY..." The biggest conspiracy has always been the fact that there is no conspiracy. Nobody's out to get you. Nobody gives a shit whether you live or die. There, you feel better now?"
So...Do you feel better now???
supermarc26 2 years ago
What did Walter Truett Anderson say about responsibility? "Our lives improve only when we take chances -- and the first and most difficult risk we can take is to be honest with ourselves." So if one checks the NS website it says..." The clever idea is to insert thousands of microscopic image sensors in-between the liquid crystal display cells in the screen. Each sensor captures its own small image, but software stitches these together to create a single, larger picture. Continued...
supermarc26 2 years ago
I would call you a nut case but you are more of a fruit cake.
twilightfateangel 2 years ago
Paranoid.
Nerolus 2 years ago
DTV is not required. They have had the ability to deeply intrude into your home through the hellevision box since at least the early 90's & with 80's TV sets
As for projecting an image into your room, again, 90's with 80's TV set, the regular programming image suddenly became a black screen which split vertically down the center from where there came protruding outward a bright white light in abstract, asymmetrical, 3 dimensional form. It was light with a form that protruded approx 1.5-2 ft out
Chuichupachichi 2 years ago 2
thanks for eduacating me my freind ,i,ll be passing this message around be sure of that,maybe its not the right time to trash ur old tvs and moniters??
leanmachene 2 years ago 2
good research my friend. i had missed checking new patents. project bluebeam baby. its all part of agenda 21. the race is on. everyone should forget what they know about technology.
atothefuckinizzle 2 years ago 3
Some people will believe anything lol. What a bunch of BS.
bobby1144 2 years ago
Patent # 20060007222? That alone debunks any theory. Patents are only up to about 8,000,000 right now. I also noticed the docs were small, and only parts you want to show were legible.
The DTV conversion is to simply free up bandwidth, because all the usable bandwidth is gone. They will recover channels 52-69, and I believe 2-6. That's all there was to it. The idea of HDTV was in the works since 1975, and arrived to what we have now in 1997.
georgef551 2 years ago
how much do you get paid to spread this disinformation? ..... and how long have you been a freemason?
FreeMystery 2 years ago
You are correct, it's not a patent, it's a patent application. It,however, does not mean the technology is invalid.
I only show portions of documents. I provide the links, in this case, link to the patent app. so that viewers can read the entire patent on their own. It is not my job to educate. My goal is to try to make people think, and provide links to documents that helped me form my decision.
whether someone reads the info, that's another story.
nwosigns 2 years ago 2
If they DID put cameras into displays, the cost of a TV would be about $750,000, with a 50% cut for bulk cameras.
Then again, the only feasable way is a single-cell photosensor, but unless your face is right on the screen, all it'll see is a single color (the whole array). It needs a method to focus light, and with autofocus, and adjustment mechanicals, it's too overpriced. If the Conspiracy Theorists want to run with this, the only option would be a single camera in the TV somewhere.
georgef551 2 years ago
@georgef551 Nice try at disinforming people. Feel free to show your private life if you are so head strong against the possibility. FYI, electronic engineers can and do make infrared recievers that can bounce light into a room that is then sent back and converted into pixel values. Instead of just denying the info, go and get an education on how this technology truely works.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
....yet I don't see you backing your claim up, versus me, backing it up with FACTS.
WINNING!!
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 If you want to call your disinfo fact. Prove what I said wrong, you can't.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@georgef551 Oh that is right, you can't prove me wrong because a patent exists to show the technology is already out there. Like I said, get an education on how this technology truely works, until then....
WINNING!
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
You mean a patent with a ficticious number way out of sequence? Yeah, fake as it gets.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 Wow you sure were fast on recieving an education on how this actually works. I agree, the patent info is proving to be fake, that is what you call disinformation to make it look fake. Yet I give you credit for pointing that out. How ever you still did not prove my origional comment as false. Do you know how digital cameras work, once you find out, apply that technology to the fuction of an infrared reciever and tell me what you see similar.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Camera need a lens in order to train light onto a sensor, even a pinhole works. Problem is, the theory posted simply has a sensor, meaning it'll just receive the average light info from whatever hits it. Then, you would have to add a lens to target light. At this point, the FOV is too narrow, so you make the image "fish-eye" to see more. The array will fail, because none of the edges will allign, and you get the average light blob yet again.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 You never answered my question, if anything you are stating how infrared recievers and digital cameras sold on the market are different, I asked how are they the same. An infrared reciever can obtain the non visible light emitted into a room, much like the process of how a digital camera emits light. The infrared reciever has the capability to recieve light then translate it into binary data that is then processed through a micro processor(no lense needed).
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Digital cameras COLLECT light, not emit them, unless they have a flash, or general light attached.
You can't even keep your OWN arguments straight.
Where did the infared come up? Seeing things that aren't there?
Same deal, infaread, or visible, you need to fix the light onto the sensor, not simply collect it.
You can't even point out your OWN arguments......
(The more this goes on, the easier it is.)
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 Or unless it also has thermal capabilities and or infrared. The light is still CAPTURED by a digital sensor array. You sure have your panties in a bunch for someone who finds himself winning. You see I am trying to get you to find the similarities and all you keep doing is finding differences, then throw in an insult to make yourself feel better. George, lets not get rude here, lets see if there are similarities between digital cameras and infrared recievers.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@georgef551 Go on George, don't be scared, show the similarities between the two. You are obviously a smart guy, so what is the hold up.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@georgef551 I will kindly answere my own question for you George. The thing they have in common is the ability to read Electromagnetics. Now George, is it not possible that the infrared reciever could be designed to convert all the electromagnetics in its sensor range, of all the objects in a room, seeing how all objects have an electromagnetic field? Now tell me again that its not possible to have Optics with no lens.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
I hate to tell this to you, but not everything has an electromagnetic field, and if so, they're so tiny, the most sensitive of equipment cannot pick them up. Again, these waves would have to be pinpointed onto a sensor. Just hitting them would give an average in the space, not an image.
(This is getting WAY too easy now.)
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 You may want to go back to physics 101,Electromagnetic fields can exist in anything with molecules, and yes we as humans do give off an electromagnetic field.You are right, some objects give off less of a magnetic field, which only proves my point that you would contrast greatly with your couch. lol No, the waves would not have to be pin pointed, it just has to be in the field of the infrared recievers eye.
(Your ego does not scare me.)
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@georgef551 "the most sensitive of equipment cannot pick them up." I hate to tell you this, but yes a magnetometer is sensitive enough, so sorry to break it to you, the technology exists.
Too easy indeed.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Again, you got one sensor picking it up, asd in, one pixel. If there is an array, and there is a focused image on the sensor array, all you'd either get is a 3D polygon image, or possibly a grayscale image.
At this point, if a usable image is obtainable, my argument of size versus ability repeats at the beginning, making this a closed loop, with you stuck inside, being unable to pinpoint the feasibility of this concept in a $1,500 TV.
(WAY too easy.)
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 Again you have an infrared sensor that is already built to recieve information via electromagnetics/light, then you have objects which are in the room that give off a different spectrum of electromagnetics, which is then recieved by the eye of the infrared reciever. Nice double talk by the way.
Easy indeed.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Since you can't argue yourself out of a closed loop:
Did it ever occurr to you, that on another topic, that the ATSC standard only works in ONE DIRECTION? That means, broadcast goes to receiver.
Receiver would need to run at 300K, to 3M WATTS of power, to beam back anything to a communications device at the point of original transmission.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 Since I was never in a closed loop to begin with: I do believe you are assuming it works in one direction. But nice try.
Have you ever heard of bouncing transmissions? Now I know you are talking out of your ass. I guess your job is to disinform and discredit. You are doing terrible.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Discredit and disinform (is that a word??), are the only arguments you have, no facts, or explainations. Good job!
bouncing Transmissions....try again....EXPLAIN how this would work.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 "(is that a word??)" Yes they both are words. The transmission bounces back using your own satellite, what the hell else do you think I meant? Now you are just playing dumb.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Do you know that it'll take quite a bit of horsepower to sucessfully transmit a signal back to the satellite? A 100-watt TV can't do it. Sure, it could make it, but it's drowned out by similar frequencies that are thousands of times stronger.
There's a reason why stations have HUGE dishes to send the signals to the satellites.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 " , to beam back anything to a communications device at the point of original transmission." Who said anything about it going back to the point of origional transmission?
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
You're not explaining anything. You bounced back something I said, with NOTHING in return.
Again,
EXPLAIN how this (Bouncing Transmission) would work?
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 I have a test I want you to do for me, and then maybe you can answere why this happens. PAINT OVER THE EYE OF THE INFRARED RECIEVER, NOTICE YOU WILL LOSE YOUR SIGNAL WITH YOUR SATELLITE OR DIGITAL TV PROVIDER, THEN REMOVE THE WET PAINT AND NOTICE HOW EVERTHING WORKS FINE AGAIN. I did this twice, and the same thing happened. You seem to think you know so much much, so maybe you can explain why something like this would happen.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Of course that will work, because it's a SINGLE SENSOR looking for an infared signal. If the average color has the infared, the TV will pick it up. WHY do they tell you in the instructions that using it in bright flourescent lights, or sunlight, will hinder or render the remote useless? The average light the sensor sees will mostly be that, not the remote. Again, signal drown-out.
You say you know what you're talking about. I've built cameras and IR sensors before.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 It didn't just render the remote useless, it rendered the entire system useless. Proving you did not even try the test I aked you to and no that was not a good explanation that you gave. ". I've built cameras and IR sensors before." Good for you.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@georgef551 Paint over the eye over the reciever in your video converter box and tell me what happens.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Not only do you not get basic technology, you can't read either. I get the fact the system doesn't work if the path is blocked, but the problem with this concept is it's a SINGLE PIXEL of information. You can't beam in images that way.
PS: If they can do this, it won't work on me anyhow. My reception is OTA. Good luck with that.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 Not only are your insults wrong, yet so are your explanations. Painting over the infrared recievers eye should just stop the usage of the remote, for the system is recieving its transmission via coaxial or fibre optic cable. In spain Optics Research Team at UJI, developed a single pixel that could take high quality images(GO FIGURE).
p.s. "if they can do this"? What ever happened to your absolute refusal to this being possible?
No luck needed, but thanks.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
A 1x1 sensor can't make images, just a simgle color. It's not possible to make an image from it. The sensor would need a lens (again), and would have to physically scan to make an image, to the point the cost is not feasable whatsoever.
It just cannot be done, not at a price the consumer can afford.
What comes closest to this are laser projectors. The optic system used isn't cheap.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 WRONG, google "SINGLE PIXEL CAMERA CAPTURES HIGH QUALITY ENCRYPTED IMAGES" by Bridgett Borgobello, IT IS POSSIBLE, now you are just in denial after I gave you a link to the FACT that the technology exists. Now your only excuse is price, lol.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Funny. There's the article, there's the Single Pixel Camera part, but it's a tiny paragraph, and no explaination on how it works.
No details at all, or even a hint to future releases as it advances.
You fell for the oldest trick in the book.
(Note that all links point to the exact same, empty "article".)
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 Funny (note the Rice Research team also made a single pixel camera) Feel free to contact both Research teams for more info. Yet lets not get off topic, tell me why the entire video converter shut down when I painted over the eye of the infrared reciever? The box should still work, for it is still plugged into the cable that is patched into my satellite dish? The only thing that should stop working is the remote controle. Quit running away from this question.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Your box is broken.
I've covered the remote sensor with my finger on others, and they still worked. You were limited to the basic functions the front panel buttons allowed.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 My box works fine, I too tried my finger and nothing happened, it was only until I covered it with thick oil paint(blocking out all light). Then I removed the paint and it worked 100%fine. I did this twice with the exact same results. I was not limited to the basic functions of the up or down button changer on the box itself, for they had no function either. I had the Bell 4200 box.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Odd.
Most boxes do things like that, because of piracy. It's assuming the mod (black paint over IR sensor) was an attempt to override locks, even if it's some camera, if it exists.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 I agree it is odd. When I asked Bell why this would happen, they were more concerned that I opened up the box to begin with and gave no valid answere as to why the entire system stopped working. What ever the case, my satellite signal was blocked until the paint was removed. No screen error message, just a blank screen. Blocking out the light to an IR sensor is in no way an attempt to override locks, nor does it make sense that such a function was installed on the IR sensor.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
I think they're trying to prevent any tampering. If the whole system "fails", it protects copyrights of digital media companies. Dumb as it is, it was pure assumption of tampering.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 Can you say that is the reason with no doubt in mind? Why would blocking out the light to an IR sensor be detected as an assumption of tampering? It is no different than sticking your finger over it, the paint is just better at it, so why would it not sense the lack of light with your finger aswell?
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
Almost the same. There's some light getting through your finger it can see.
Manufacturers do some really odd things to try and keep thier equipment original. Any tampering yields loss of function sometimes. Some things are just silly to render a disabling.
georgef551 9 months ago
@georgef551 That is what I still find fishy, they must have had reason for it to shut down by means of blocking out all light, I just can't buy your theory as an absolute. I don't really call blocking the light to the infrared sensor as tampering.
PackOfPeterJackson 9 months ago
@PackOfPeterJackson
I agree with that, but with the challenges of copyright with digital media, I think manufacturers are doing anything to prevent theft. The system probably assumed it was tampered, and to protect the company, simply shuts it down. Overkill response.
georgef551 9 months ago
I don't even watch TV anymore. And I feel ten times better.
Coincidence? Maybe. But maybe not.
ExVash 2 years ago 3
I agree - but people are so dumb that they think the best technology is the stuff we buy in the high streets.............because they don't understand it they insist it doesn't exist.
gangstagrannie 2 years ago
0016 ACCORDING TO ANOTHER EMBODIMENT a device includes at least an ILLUMINATION area that includes at least ONE LIGHT source that emits light
whooooooooozthlghtagain?
rblwoaclu 2 years ago 2
And what type of light is it?
nwosigns 2 years ago
why its fire light of course};{
rblwoaclu 2 years ago
apple computer lol knowledge back to the beginning.
rblwoaclu 2 years ago
Digital TV Transmission can send unheard low level frequencies.
Subsonic frequencies...irritate humans
to point of disorder and kaos also promotes extreme emotional stress. All without knowledge of origin.
You become unstable enough to project
anger, hate and other punishable crimes.
One outbreak is sufficient to invade your residence, dispatch and/or imprision you and your family.
I unpluged. No subs. No media.
Fresh air...breathe in.
2br2br2 2 years ago 3
ELF - extremely low frequency
gangstagrannie 2 years ago 2
Thank YOU. gOD FOR THIS MESSAGE.
Jesus Christ is coming soon!
The we are in the last days.
Turn from your sins and Believe that Jesus is Lord and be Baptized in water.
AND YOU SHALL BE SAVED!!
angelslight7 2 years ago 6
don't waste time searching for a silly camera in your tv. this is just blinding you to the REAL reason for this new digital transition. it is nothing other than to UNITE THE PEOPLE OF THE ENTIRE WORLD! A WAY FOR THE NEW WORLD ORDER "GOVT" TO BE ABLE TO REACH & CONTROL ALL OF US!
Vessel4MyFather 2 years ago 4
starts as a great new technolgy. example, the entire world now watches American idol "together" & now the entire WORLD can call in their votes. a way to unite the world. next thing we know, we are sitting in front of our tv's with the ANTICHRIST SPEAKING & REACHING THE ENTIRE WORLD IN THE NEW WORLD ORDER! it is sooo incredibly obvious what & why they are doing this! the govt is practically bending over backwards to see that this reaches all homes!
Vessel4MyFather 2 years ago 2
this is so very wrong. the entire reason for Digital TV Transition, is point blank simply a way to unite the entire world for a ONE WORLD GOVT status. it is a way for the one world/new world order govt to be able to reach ALL PEOPLE in real time.
Vessel4MyFather 2 years ago 2
My TV is always on in my home because of my older brother once he moves out I'm throwing that big boy in the trash he better take it with him lol...I always say that after a while of the TV being on I get such bad migraines...hmmm I wonder why >.>
GalacticHappenings 2 years ago 2
I had new LCD TV's for 2 yrs and I always thought something was up with the whole forced digital conversion BS. I just didn't know how they were going to do it. I even used to block the entire screen. I knew something was amiss!!
sophia071 2 years ago 2
wow great video. this technology can project an angel into the house of a christian and make that angel tell that christian that jesus has come. Perfect tool for project bluebeam(the false rapture in which millions of believers will be vaporized by a high energy space based weapon).
thementalpatient2005 2 years ago 3
THis is a great video.
MisterEThoughts 2 years ago
Don't watch TV -- have an old cathode myself and only watch videos. But remember Yin/Yang such a device is also a tool to use against them.
realview101 2 years ago 3
I been working in A/V for the last 20+ years trying to tell people about this
thank you for sahring
thefranmann 2 years ago
OH CHIT MANG!
llshamelessll 2 years ago 2
Thanks so much. Your work is excellent. Blessings,p
phnixlady 2 years ago 2
¿can I take it easy if i just Turn Off the TV???
sharetrue 2 years ago 2
Nice. I spose I should disable adblock to see the crap they're putting on there.
Thanks for the heads up. Interesting they would put an ad like that. I guess that's what the key words are for :)
nwosigns 2 years ago
Ooookay, did anyone notice to the right hand side of this page an ad for AT&T that states, "AT&T ADVANCE TV CAN HELP PREPARE YOU THE TRANSITION. LEARN MORE"? Or is it just my screen that says this?
pi6314159 2 years ago
Interesting, I have adblock addon so I see no ads.
nwosigns 2 years ago
Ya it is interesting 'cause now it says "There's a New Way to Expericence TV That Just Might Blow Your Mind"! My goodness they just announce the shit right in front of your face like you're an idiot!
pi6314159 2 years ago 3
Wow... I use Firefox and added the AdBlock Add On which let's me block all ads.. I also use Flash Block so nothing runs (including these videos) unless I click on it.
Reminds me of why I added AdBlock. Thanks.
nwosigns 2 years ago
Man, what a great point!:) I love it. Thank You!:)
MisterEThoughts 2 years ago 2
Mine says cheap spy cameras :|
GalacticHappenings 2 years ago 2
I heard that the dtv converter boxes also send out advanced mind control signal technology to control your thoughts and emotions. we should all flip off our tv screens and mouth the words, "eat shit" and "fuck you" on occasion just to piss Big Bro off!XD
bunnybooties 2 years ago
TV is a big enough mind controller without this... We should certainly turn of our TVs.
santorinisantorini 2 years ago 6
Genius :P
GalacticHappenings 2 years ago
1984 is a fictional novel that discusses this technology and others as a "Big Brother" conspiracy. The crazy part is that within the story, the TV can be off, but the "camera screen" stays on and continues to watch the surroundings. If you cover the tv with a blanket, the cops might come to your house lol.
There is no need for cameras within digital boxes, I think that there is something dark as to why they want this device to go on the market.
peachesandsunshine9 2 years ago 2
god just turn off your fucking tv... and dont buy an iphone
nelson3300 2 years ago
I knew this is what it was all about but didn't really understand the science. Thanks.
ittlebite 2 years ago 2
Its all for PROJECT BLUEBEAM.
FreethinkerM357 2 years ago
I Tottaly Believe It Man.
godparticleband 2 years ago
I have actually seen this type of thing with my computer screen-old type not lcd. I bought some toy a few years back and the instructions to activate it were to hold it up to my computer monitor to scan the bar code on the toy-I did and it did (it read the toy THROUGH MY MONITOR), through the monitor it read the bar code on the toy. If I still have the item and can find it I will come back and reply to this post exactly what the toy was and where it came from and who manufactured it.
700eyesonly007 2 years ago
wait are u talking about that little Pocket LCD toy? The one where u scan bar codes and it creates little black and white LCD monsters based on the bar codes? Is that what u mean? Cuz that was only for bar code scanning of the bar codes on products we buy or products in supermarkets...i don't recall the ad saying the moniter..
True2TheBlueYoViGang 2 years ago