great car but the wheels are ugly and small considering the wheel arches are so big so that leaves a big gape between the wheels and arches and another thing is that the interior comes in one color and that's bad cause many people doesn't like black and its modern and sporty the red, maroon,cooper,caramel, burgundy, brown colors.
Wait a minute. A 6.4L V8 with 470hp and 465 ft-lb of torque can only tow 5000 lbs. You have the same tow rating on a 2012 Explorer with its 3.5L V6 that only has 295hp and 255 ft-lb of torque. Hell, the 6.2L V8 on an F-150 pulls 11000 lbs and gets comparable gas mileage.
@RollinOnDemDubz agreed on that, pipe placement sucks, loved the center pipes, and tone at an idle are not that great..its deep when you get on it though while driving..
@Mario4Italy ok smartass lets look at some numbers for comparison.
Jeep 0-60 4.6 sec, 1/4 mile 13.3, base price $60,960
x5m 0-60 4.5 sec, 1/4 mile 12.8, base price $92,000
I dont think u can justify 30k and if thats the case ill take the jeep and buy a gsxr1000 to smoke your sorry ass and then a trailer to haul it in and still have money left over.
@wsmarines First, the SRT8 needs 4.8 secs from 0-60, not 4.6 as you claimed. Then, the big thing that sets the BMW X5M appart from all other performance SUVs is handling, not straight line performance. The SRT8's handling is not bad for a SUV. But the X5M just kills it and even outhandles many much smaller and lighter cars.
And the 30k you pay more for the X5M are for the luxury and better build quality, where BMW just owns Jeep in every possible way.
@ratmtbolathe X5M Is a beautiful truck, no arguing there and handling wise, well its a bmw..lol..but i have a 2012 jeep srt8..i average 4.5 to 4.8.. and my best run was 4.3 with the best 1/4 time at 12.7..and average 12.9 ..once this thing breaks in a bit it delivers the numbers..it handles excellent ,and and feels great in the corners.and for the price, it looks way better than the BMW to me..but taste is subjective..srt8 was just a better pick for me..
@deljuicy0309 Sure, depends on what you want to (or can) pay. If you got no limitations in terms of money, the X5M surely is the better performance SUV in just about every single possible way.
@wsmarines i have the 2012 srt8, the performance numbers i average on a reg basis are 4.6,with a best time of 4.3 .. 1/4 mile 12.9 with a best 12.7...srt8 all the way..and i just flat out love the look over the bmw..the bmw is hot, but for 30k more..keep it..srt8 all the way.and it can pull my shelby to the track lol and i can race them both when i get there...GOD BLESS!
@xxMafia101 That would make them look more expensive for sure, but a better idea for a car that cost that much would be to use GOOD plastics instead of the junk they use now.
lol this video contradicts itself. In the begining he says the purpose of this is to give up nothing, but later on he says it takes a hit on gas milege
great car but the wheels are ugly and small considering the wheel arches are so big so that leaves a big gape between the wheels and arches and another thing is that the interior comes in one color and that's bad cause many people doesn't like black and its modern and sporty the red, maroon,cooper,caramel, burgundy, brown colors.
firas2003 1 week ago
Wait a minute. A 6.4L V8 with 470hp and 465 ft-lb of torque can only tow 5000 lbs. You have the same tow rating on a 2012 Explorer with its 3.5L V6 that only has 295hp and 255 ft-lb of torque. Hell, the 6.2L V8 on an F-150 pulls 11000 lbs and gets comparable gas mileage.
MelkorHimself 1 week ago 4
It took Chrysler damn near a CENTURY to finally get it RIGHT!! Better late than never I guess....
BMWDRE10 1 month ago
DA OLD SRT8 LOOKED WAY MEANER!
kingtako247 1 month ago
dosnt that 6.4 hemi have that stupid cylinder de-activation crap?
COBHC8890 1 month ago
That exhaust isnt even that great...
RollinOnDemDubz 1 month ago
@RollinOnDemDubz agreed on that, pipe placement sucks, loved the center pipes, and tone at an idle are not that great..its deep when you get on it though while driving..
deljuicy0309 1 month ago
12-13 mpg in the city.. god damn that sucks
jtboll00 1 month ago
@taIldude121 Sounds like you've been high on methamphidemine for too long get a life fatass hairy shit!
fvgotch 1 month ago
Comment removed
fvgotch 1 month ago
im not feeling with the rims, looks better with five spokes..
MrTurbo4G63T 1 month ago
Comment removed
talldude123 1 month ago
Comment removed
talldude123 1 month ago
Comment removed
talldude123 1 month ago
gnarly? who says that? other than those blonde hawaiian surfers.
itsTiLER 1 month ago
this guy goes from calling this a car, to an SUV, to a truck.
elementskater910 1 month ago
Yeah the ML63 isn't worthy of being compared to this! Overpriced & ugly... sounds like a winning recipe for zee Germans!
chitownzprinz 1 month ago
4.8 sec?! Are you kidding me?!
Beautiful rims and interior. Exterior is in fact really nice as well. Man, this car seems so cool!
MfalmeVTold 1 month ago
That is an SUV that hauls...
Bzapp725 1 month ago
Nice car.
5Qu1Z33r 1 month ago
The first gen srt8 looked way better.
miami428 1 month ago
Yeah it would sound even nice if you didn't play that cheesy music throughout the entire video sheesh.
onishchuk4 1 month ago
0:16 it gives up rock crawling
1doesntlikeapplepie 1 month ago
Wheels are hideous
Crushercurtis702 1 month ago
@Crushercurtis702 YES YES YES YES PREVIOUS FAR BETTER
Ha99ed 1 month ago
it's awesome but 12mpg in city is just freaking crazy
ExtraTerrestrials 1 month ago
@imagination4me lol good point!
dswag0910 1 month ago
60 MPH in 4.0 second, handling well, and when you could afford the car with the power. You just don't care about the MPG anymore.
imaginaiton4me 1 month ago
18 on the highway WHAT A CLUNKER!!
crammage 1 month ago
@crammage
I drive an SRT8 300. I LOVE it. I can afford the gas even though it's a complete waste. I saw a guy with a Jeep today and it was STUNNING.
bigtruckseriesreview 1 month ago
the x5 m has 555hp vs this things 465
plus it gets 20 mpg highway vs 18
Chrysler you fail once again, continue to make the sebring ** i mean 200
Mario4Italy 1 month ago
@Mario4Italy The x5 is also considerably more money
flynmid 1 month ago
@Mario4Italy ok smartass lets look at some numbers for comparison.
Jeep 0-60 4.6 sec, 1/4 mile 13.3, base price $60,960
x5m 0-60 4.5 sec, 1/4 mile 12.8, base price $92,000
I dont think u can justify 30k and if thats the case ill take the jeep and buy a gsxr1000 to smoke your sorry ass and then a trailer to haul it in and still have money left over.
wsmarines 1 month ago
@wsmarines A Bentley is 300k and is slower. What is your point?
Johnyboy775 1 month ago
@Johnyboy775 He is just an idiot.
Mario4Italy 1 month ago
@wsmarines calm down Wikipedia master
Mario4Italy 1 month ago
@wsmarines First, the SRT8 needs 4.8 secs from 0-60, not 4.6 as you claimed. Then, the big thing that sets the BMW X5M appart from all other performance SUVs is handling, not straight line performance. The SRT8's handling is not bad for a SUV. But the X5M just kills it and even outhandles many much smaller and lighter cars.
And the 30k you pay more for the X5M are for the luxury and better build quality, where BMW just owns Jeep in every possible way.
Now who's the smartass?
ratmtbola 1 month ago
@ratmtbolathe X5M Is a beautiful truck, no arguing there and handling wise, well its a bmw..lol..but i have a 2012 jeep srt8..i average 4.5 to 4.8.. and my best run was 4.3 with the best 1/4 time at 12.7..and average 12.9 ..once this thing breaks in a bit it delivers the numbers..it handles excellent ,and and feels great in the corners.and for the price, it looks way better than the BMW to me..but taste is subjective..srt8 was just a better pick for me..
deljuicy0309 1 month ago
@deljuicy0309 Sure, depends on what you want to (or can) pay. If you got no limitations in terms of money, the X5M surely is the better performance SUV in just about every single possible way.
ratmtbola 1 month ago
@wsmarines i have the 2012 srt8, the performance numbers i average on a reg basis are 4.6,with a best time of 4.3 .. 1/4 mile 12.9 with a best 12.7...srt8 all the way..and i just flat out love the look over the bmw..the bmw is hot, but for 30k more..keep it..srt8 all the way.and it can pull my shelby to the track lol and i can race them both when i get there...GOD BLESS!
deljuicy0309 1 month ago
@xxMafia101 That would make them look more expensive for sure, but a better idea for a car that cost that much would be to use GOOD plastics instead of the junk they use now.
cm18cam 1 month ago
lol one day i hope im well off enough to buy a jeep to haul around my other jeep, lol
randyseck 1 month ago
18 miles on the highway ?
That sucks - and only 465hp
come on dude - this thing blows
sid203 1 month ago
@sid203 Its an SRT! lol its a performance SUV! lol!!!! My 1990 Coupe deville gets 20 HAHA!!!!!
randyseck 1 month ago
lol this video contradicts itself. In the begining he says the purpose of this is to give up nothing, but later on he says it takes a hit on gas milege
sssmeee 1 month ago 14
@sssmeee i think he was talking about performance but i get what you were saying.
wsmarines 1 month ago
@sssmeee Don't foreget your gonna give up a second car just so you can have the honor of driving it due to its price.
knack0125 1 month ago
@sssmeee
You're critiquing a contradiction on a sports car about fuel economy? LOL!!! Waste of time!
bquick420 1 month ago
I'm glad Chrysler got their shit together.
ynkno13 1 month ago 35
@ynkno13
You an me both. I'm on my second 300 (SRT8) and I'm gonna buy a 3rd.
bigtruckseriesreview 1 month ago
@ynkno13 Fiat says: You're welcome!
RobbertvanDoorn360 1 month ago
2012 grand jeep cherokee srt 8 weight is 6500 pounds not 5000.
4fastdrs 1 month ago
Though the interior has come a LONG way, some buttons still look cheap.
cm18cam 1 month ago
@cm18cam Well maybe they should plate the fucking buttons in Gold next time.
xxMafia101 1 month ago
Top speed? Does it come with a roof rack?
talldude123 1 month ago
this competes with a Mercedes ML63 AMG.
DGuerraMadrigal 1 month ago
@DGuerraMadrigal thats like saying a bicycle compares with a honda cbr600
arashn89 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@DGuerraMadrigal "this competes with a Mercedes ML63 AMG."
Performance wise, yes. In every other way, no.
ratmtbola 1 month ago
What does this compete with?! The Porsche Cayenne? The Toyota 4Runner? The VW Toureag?
skinnysponge 1 month ago
I don't like SUV's, but for some reason I like the Grand Cherokee a lot. SRT8 or not.
goofeewalden1 1 month ago
@goofeewalden1 Same here. I can't think of another SUV that I like -- just this one.
123gwf 1 month ago
audio distorted
chanmaung 1 month ago
give up nothing....except all your miles to the gallon
nitroboyn2o 1 month ago
6th BITCHES!!! HAHAHAHAAA
remelsheikh 1 month ago
Great exhaust, crappy gas mileage.
mokos23 1 month ago
man 4th
thetweeterman2871 1 month ago
second!
CoyoteXpress 1 month ago
ahh 240p we meet again
xtyson5 1 month ago
first
caranddriverMing 1 month ago