good review man but to be honest to see this game in all its glory you really need the PC version.The lighting in the PC version is incredible and the fact that the PC version supports 64 players really amps up the action
@whiteboyjimmy20 If you play a game because of Campaign your an idiot unless its a RPG game. How about games that are made for a couple years and don't even have a Mp? But yet you can review that game and give it a high score. Dice makes Mp games not Campaign games. Sorry.
@ImThatFunnyGuy Your an idiot, Half-life 1- 2, Bioshock, System Shock, Portal 1, Metal Gear Solid 1-2-3, and so many great single player games. What about Batman AA or Batman AC? You sir, are the idiot. Those game didn't even have a multiplayer.
Good review. I thought the campaign sucked and was really forgettable. If they hadn't tried to rip off Call of Duty and used the Frostbite engine to its maximum potential, they really could have done something spectacular singleplayer-wise. I do wish you had actually showed multiplayer footage and talked more in depth about the classes, vehicles, map design, hit detection, latency/lag, and things like that, though. It kind of sucks to have a Battlefield 3 review with literally no MP footage.
@Chubzdoomer i was going to but was running out of time as i like to keep my reviews less then 7 min and thought it was more important to explain why the campaign was bad.
@masterman3178 Not nagging or anything, but why do you keep your reviews so short? I think they would be absolutely fantastic if they were 10-15 or so minutes long. Just one other small suggestion, too: If you could find a way to make the footage fit properly into the 16:9 (720p) aspect ratio here on YouTube, it would make it look better. Right now, it looks as though it's stretched out just a little. Keep up the good work.
Good review.
badmojo451 3 months ago
this game has the worst vocie acting
hobosbob 3 months ago
good review man but to be honest to see this game in all its glory you really need the PC version.The lighting in the PC version is incredible and the fact that the PC version supports 64 players really amps up the action
banenwn 3 months ago
fantastic review! thanks
boston432 3 months ago
People that say the Campaign is a rip off of Cod is stupid this game has been in Development for 4 years.
ImThatFunnyGuy 4 months ago
@ImThatFunnyGuy well there quality assurance team must be on drugs because there are so many bugs it looks like they made it in 6 months.
masterman3178 4 months ago
@ImThatFunnyGuy I played the whole Campaign on Xbox 360 and had no problems, no bugs nothing it was great.
ImThatFunnyGuy 4 months ago
@ImThatFunnyGuy 4 years? And a 5 hour single player is all we get?
whiteboyjimmy20 3 months ago
@whiteboyjimmy20 If you play a game because of Campaign your an idiot unless its a RPG game. How about games that are made for a couple years and don't even have a Mp? But yet you can review that game and give it a high score. Dice makes Mp games not Campaign games. Sorry.
ImThatFunnyGuy 3 months ago
@ImThatFunnyGuy Your an idiot, Half-life 1- 2, Bioshock, System Shock, Portal 1, Metal Gear Solid 1-2-3, and so many great single player games. What about Batman AA or Batman AC? You sir, are the idiot. Those game didn't even have a multiplayer.
whiteboyjimmy20 3 months ago
Good review. I thought the campaign sucked and was really forgettable. If they hadn't tried to rip off Call of Duty and used the Frostbite engine to its maximum potential, they really could have done something spectacular singleplayer-wise. I do wish you had actually showed multiplayer footage and talked more in depth about the classes, vehicles, map design, hit detection, latency/lag, and things like that, though. It kind of sucks to have a Battlefield 3 review with literally no MP footage.
Chubzdoomer 4 months ago
@Chubzdoomer i was going to but was running out of time as i like to keep my reviews less then 7 min and thought it was more important to explain why the campaign was bad.
masterman3178 4 months ago
@masterman3178 Not nagging or anything, but why do you keep your reviews so short? I think they would be absolutely fantastic if they were 10-15 or so minutes long. Just one other small suggestion, too: If you could find a way to make the footage fit properly into the 16:9 (720p) aspect ratio here on YouTube, it would make it look better. Right now, it looks as though it's stretched out just a little. Keep up the good work.
Chubzdoomer 4 months ago
Cool
dadman1988 4 months ago
Thanks for the early review
cyclecurt3 4 months ago
@cyclecurt3 NP
masterman3178 4 months ago