NOT having 900+ FOREIGN military bases OCCUPYING almost every nation on Earth, using BOMBS or BRIBES to enforce our EMPIRE and FORCING other nations to the AMERICAN "way of life".
@yakyakyak69 - "At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth in their military chest; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years." - Abraham Lincoln
@NAGGERNUTZ Defending the Fatherland is the excuse for tyranny at home and abroad.
Empire ALWAYS ends in the financial collapse of every nation that attempts it.
The US is the largest debtor nation in the history of Earth.
We are bankrupt + unfundated mandates exceed $200 Trillion.
Our liabilities exceed our assetts. The ONLY think a nation can do to remain soverign in this situation is to print & debase their currency. This ALWAYS leads to hyperinflation, collapse & starvation!
@NAGGERNUTZ What you FAIL to understand is that WE have been occupying THEIR land with OUR military while using "bomb or bribe" diplomacy to manipulate THEIR leaders and THEIR people since WWI. For the last 100 years we have needed THEIR oil to fuel OUR EMPIRE.
According to the 911 commission report, they don't resist us because we are free, they and MOST of the world RESIST the US Occupying military EMPIRE backed by a global banking fraud with fiat DEBT based currency.
@yakyakyak69 Really...lol.. so the taliban in Afghanistan, who we helped to defeat Russia, backed Al Queada because we had troops in Afghanistan? UM.. we did not have troops there until they attacked us. We don't have troops anywhere in the world that the leader doesn't want us there. nice try though....
@yakyakyak69 HMM, I didn't see an answer to my question, I saw a re-direction of the conversation, or perhaps an attempt at a mis-direction. Were American troops in Afghanistan before the WTC attack? I'll save you the time and effort and answer it for you. No, America did not send troops to Afghanistan until after we were attacked.
@yakyakyak69 again you try to misdirect the debate. America retaliated to the WTC attack. end of debate. And again I point out that America doesn't have troops anywhere in the world where the leaders haven't asked us to be there. America occupies no country against the will of its leaders. End of story.
We just helped MURDER another president of a soverign foreign nation.
Now you show me where in the Constitution it says that we can have 900+ military bases occupying almost every nation on Earth and give American blood & treasure to force "democracy" on others by bribing or threatening their "leaders".
US Diplomacy : "Let us put a base here and we'll give you money. Don't let us put a base here and we'll KILL YOU!"
@yakyakyak69 The leaders in those countries want us to have bases in their countries.
I think that Libya was an illegal war. I know that the looney left wing nuts always claimed that Iraq was an illegal war, but Bush went to congress and got approval before attacking. Obama did not. That said, we have no troops there and my comment remains true, No country that USA occupies is doing so against the will of its leaders.
@intrepidorator Like most statists, you don't tell the WHOLE truth!
You statement SHOULD read:
"No country that USA occupies is doing so against the will of its [bribed, threatened, or coerced] leaders.
Now, WHERE in the Constitution does it say the that the president can engage in "regime change" and endless wars without a DECLARATION of WAR by the US Congress?
@yakyakyak69 Thats the point that I ade about Obama. I stated clearly that Libya is an illegal war. Obama did not get approval from congress to engage in war with Libya. however Iraq had congressional approval. This power was given to the president under the "war powers act".
I think that you don't understand the term statist. I am not a statist. I strongly condemn any government who tramples individual liberty.
A War Powers Resolution is NOT a Declaration of War!
Then again, Congress did not declare war on Vietnam, Grenada, Lebanon, Somalia, Haiti, Panama, Serbia, or Bosnia either. But U.S. military personnel killed people in those countries and/or were killed in those countries during military actions—acts of war.
Congress has not declared War since WWII giving us IN FACT a Military Dictatorship!
@yakyakyak69 right, the war powers act gave the president permission to send in troops to kill our enemy for 90 days, then the congress must give approval, King Obama did not even seek approval for the killing in Libya, it is an illegal war.
Like a "good sheeple" you're still playing their D vs R game.
This is about the Rule of Law, NOT "Democrat vs Republican" BOTH are just wings of the Big Gov't Constitution-Hating Oligarchy.
Give any POLITICIAN the money & power to "redistribute & regulate" & they will ALWAYS become cronies & benefit THEIR “special interest” campaign backers; Banks, Wall Street, Military-Industrial Complex, Marxist Union Bosses, Giant "Green" Corps, Big Oil etc.
A half-truth is WORSE than a lie because it can be partially defended.
The WHOLE truth is that BOTH political parties are but 2 wings on the SAME statist bird of prey. Both wings love war because it empowers them. Both wings hate individual liberty because they hate personal responsibility. Both love dependance on gov't to one extend or another and both love OTHER people's money!
Why? Watch "Statism's Assembly Line" here on YouTube.
@yakyakyak69 You say Statist I say progressive, nothing I have said is untrue or only half true. We haven't had a conservative president in 30 years, and the state of our country proves that progressivism is destructive.
Give any POLITICIAN the money & power to "redistribute & regulate" & they will ALWAYS benefit THEIR “special interest” campaign backers; Banks, Wall Street, Military-Industrial Complex, Marxist Union Bosses, Giant "Green" Corps, Big Oil etc.
Progressivism aka “statism” CREATES Cronyism.
FIAT (counterfeit) debt-currency from the Fed just FUELS THE FIRE!
Watch: “G. Edward Griffin: Individualism & Capitalism vs. Collectivism & Monopolies” here on YouTube!
As bad as 9/11 was, we can't forget about threats from state actors like Iran, North Korea, or China. Now that Obama and the tea party want to cut R&D programs like the F-22, future aircraft carriers and, I predict, the F-35, we will be at a dangerous disadvantage to China in the event of a (very plausible) confrontation over Taiwan or North Korea.
@migkillertwo What was really bad was that the Bush Administration got away with murder..... buildings don't just fall into their own footprint unless they are PROFESSIONALLY demolished. And of course we have Larry Silverstein on LIVE TV saying that Bldg 7(yes, there were 3 that fell) was going to be PULLED....AKA demolished.
You can't be serious. First, Silverstein never had the authority to demolish any of his buildings. "Pull it" meant to pull out the firefighters. WTC 7 was already evacuated. There was no point in putting the lives of FDNY in jeopardy. Second, nobody said that the buildings fell on their own. A fucking fully-fueled jet crashed into the buildings, blowing off all the fireproofing and weakening the steel core of the buildings.
This has been flagged as spam show
Financial Enemy of Greece, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Portugal, & America - Jew
1.Goldman Sachs CEO, Lyold Blankfein -Jew
2.IMF Deputy CEO, John Lisky - Jew
3.Ex IMF CEO, Dominic Strauss -Jew
4.World Bank CEO, Robert Zoellick -Jew
5.Ex World Bank CEO, James Woolfesen -Jew
6.Fed Chairman, Ben Bernanke - Jew
7.Ex Fed Chairman, Alan Greenspan -Jew
8.Obama Treasury Secretary, Timothy Geithner-Jew
9.George Bush Treasury Secretary, Hank Paulson -Jew
Stevie68000 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
When the Christian Rapture comes, Jew will be killed.
Stevie68000 4 months ago
The KEY word here is DEFENSE!
NOT having 900+ FOREIGN military bases OCCUPYING almost every nation on Earth, using BOMBS or BRIBES to enforce our EMPIRE and FORCING other nations to the AMERICAN "way of life".
DEFENSE is NOT EMPIRE!
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 - "At what point shall we expect the approach of danger? By what means shall we fortify against it? Shall we expect some transatlantic military giant, to step the Ocean, and crush us at a blow? Never! All the armies of Europe, Asia and Africa combined, with all the treasure of the earth in their military chest; with a Buonaparte for a commander, could not by force, take a drink from the Ohio, or make a track on the Blue Ridge, in a trial of a thousand years." - Abraham Lincoln
NAGGERNUTZ 4 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ Defending the Fatherland is the excuse for tyranny at home and abroad.
Empire ALWAYS ends in the financial collapse of every nation that attempts it.
The US is the largest debtor nation in the history of Earth.
We are bankrupt + unfundated mandates exceed $200 Trillion.
Our liabilities exceed our assetts. The ONLY think a nation can do to remain soverign in this situation is to print & debase their currency. This ALWAYS leads to hyperinflation, collapse & starvation!
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 - Would you rather fight them there, or here in our streets and front yards?
NAGGERNUTZ 4 months ago
@NAGGERNUTZ What you FAIL to understand is that WE have been occupying THEIR land with OUR military while using "bomb or bribe" diplomacy to manipulate THEIR leaders and THEIR people since WWI. For the last 100 years we have needed THEIR oil to fuel OUR EMPIRE.
According to the 911 commission report, they don't resist us because we are free, they and MOST of the world RESIST the US Occupying military EMPIRE backed by a global banking fraud with fiat DEBT based currency.
END THE FED!
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 Really...lol.. so the taliban in Afghanistan, who we helped to defeat Russia, backed Al Queada because we had troops in Afghanistan? UM.. we did not have troops there until they attacked us. We don't have troops anywhere in the world that the leader doesn't want us there. nice try though....
intrepidorator 4 months ago
@intrepidorator You're being manipulated by the Big Gov't "Progressives" in BOTH party who KNOW that YOUR FEAR controls you.
Nothing concentrates political power & money faster than endless wars based on fearful children and "boogy-man" lies.
sheeple....
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 HMM, I didn't see an answer to my question, I saw a re-direction of the conversation, or perhaps an attempt at a mis-direction. Were American troops in Afghanistan before the WTC attack? I'll save you the time and effort and answer it for you. No, America did not send troops to Afghanistan until after we were attacked.
intrepidorator 4 months ago
@intrepidorator Speaking about "re-direction".
I did not even use the word "Afghanistan" anywhere in my comment.
I did say THEIR LAND!
The Middle-East is NOWHERE on a map of the USA yet we have had military bases there, using bomb or foreign-aid bribe "Diplomacy" there since WWI.
What would YOU do if they came here and bombed OUR cities while trying to force shria law here for over 100 years?
Oh right.... "bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran" - John McSame
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 again you try to misdirect the debate. America retaliated to the WTC attack. end of debate. And again I point out that America doesn't have troops anywhere in the world where the leaders haven't asked us to be there. America occupies no country against the will of its leaders. End of story.
intrepidorator 4 months ago
@intrepidorator said:
"America occupies no country against the will of its leaders."
Telling a lie enough times does NOT make it the truth...
unless you're talking to sheeple.
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 name a country that America is occupying against the will of its leader?
Sheeple ie you, can not name a country that America has troops in where the leaders don't want us.
Think for yourself.
intrepidorator 4 months ago
@intrepidorator Iraq, Afganistan, Lybia (via Nato)
We just helped MURDER another president of a soverign foreign nation.
Now you show me where in the Constitution it says that we can have 900+ military bases occupying almost every nation on Earth and give American blood & treasure to force "democracy" on others by bribing or threatening their "leaders".
US Diplomacy : "Let us put a base here and we'll give you money. Don't let us put a base here and we'll KILL YOU!"
Imperalism!
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 The leaders in those countries want us to have bases in their countries.
I think that Libya was an illegal war. I know that the looney left wing nuts always claimed that Iraq was an illegal war, but Bush went to congress and got approval before attacking. Obama did not. That said, we have no troops there and my comment remains true, No country that USA occupies is doing so against the will of its leaders.
intrepidorator 4 months ago
@intrepidorator Like most statists, you don't tell the WHOLE truth!
You statement SHOULD read:
"No country that USA occupies is doing so against the will of its [bribed, threatened, or coerced] leaders.
Now, WHERE in the Constitution does it say the that the president can engage in "regime change" and endless wars without a DECLARATION of WAR by the US Congress?
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 Thats the point that I ade about Obama. I stated clearly that Libya is an illegal war. Obama did not get approval from congress to engage in war with Libya. however Iraq had congressional approval. This power was given to the president under the "war powers act".
I think that you don't understand the term statist. I am not a statist. I strongly condemn any government who tramples individual liberty.
intrepidorator 4 months ago
@intrepidorator The war powers act ONLY comes into play AFTER Congress DECLARES war!
Congress has not DECLARED war since WWII!
You also said: " I strongly condemn any government who tramples individual liberty."
So, how's that "patriot act" working out for you?
What about the Department of Fatherland Security?
Warrentless wire taps? Unlimited prison without charge or trail? Suspension of Habeas corpus? Presidential "hit lists"? (should I go on?)
Define Hypocrite!
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@intrepidorator
A War Powers Resolution is NOT a Declaration of War!
Then again, Congress did not declare war on Vietnam, Grenada, Lebanon, Somalia, Haiti, Panama, Serbia, or Bosnia either. But U.S. military personnel killed people in those countries and/or were killed in those countries during military actions—acts of war.
Congress has not declared War since WWII giving us IN FACT a Military Dictatorship!
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 right, the war powers act gave the president permission to send in troops to kill our enemy for 90 days, then the congress must give approval, King Obama did not even seek approval for the killing in Libya, it is an illegal war.
intrepidorator 4 months ago
@intrepidorator That is the problem!
Like a "good sheeple" you're still playing their D vs R game.
This is about the Rule of Law, NOT "Democrat vs Republican" BOTH are just wings of the Big Gov't Constitution-Hating Oligarchy.
Give any POLITICIAN the money & power to "redistribute & regulate" & they will ALWAYS become cronies & benefit THEIR “special interest” campaign backers; Banks, Wall Street, Military-Industrial Complex, Marxist Union Bosses, Giant "Green" Corps, Big Oil etc.
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 What, don't be a fool, I never mentioned political parties, I merely pointed out the undeniable truth.
intrepidorator 4 months ago
@intrepidorator You mean undeniable HALF-truth!
A half-truth is WORSE than a lie because it can be partially defended.
The WHOLE truth is that BOTH political parties are but 2 wings on the SAME statist bird of prey. Both wings love war because it empowers them. Both wings hate individual liberty because they hate personal responsibility. Both love dependance on gov't to one extend or another and both love OTHER people's money!
Why? Watch "Statism's Assembly Line" here on YouTube.
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
@yakyakyak69 You say Statist I say progressive, nothing I have said is untrue or only half true. We haven't had a conservative president in 30 years, and the state of our country proves that progressivism is destructive.
intrepidorator 4 months ago
@intrepidorator
Give any POLITICIAN the money & power to "redistribute & regulate" & they will ALWAYS benefit THEIR “special interest” campaign backers; Banks, Wall Street, Military-Industrial Complex, Marxist Union Bosses, Giant "Green" Corps, Big Oil etc.
Progressivism aka “statism” CREATES Cronyism.
FIAT (counterfeit) debt-currency from the Fed just FUELS THE FIRE!
Watch: “G. Edward Griffin: Individualism & Capitalism vs. Collectivism & Monopolies” here on YouTube!
End the FED
yakyakyak69 4 months ago
High amounts of insider trading leading up to 9/11. If you understand business, economics, and the stock market, then you'll know.
BTW, who's Tim Osman?
wldeanml 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jihad is a Permanent Threat - they will Never Stop trying to Kill us.
3martijns 4 months ago
USA is being Destroyed from Within by a Combo of Radicals in Government and a Dumbed Down populace!!
3martijns 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
bitch 911 is an inside JOB!
lynb243 5 months ago
As bad as 9/11 was, we can't forget about threats from state actors like Iran, North Korea, or China. Now that Obama and the tea party want to cut R&D programs like the F-22, future aircraft carriers and, I predict, the F-35, we will be at a dangerous disadvantage to China in the event of a (very plausible) confrontation over Taiwan or North Korea.
migkillertwo 5 months ago
@migkillertwo What was really bad was that the Bush Administration got away with murder..... buildings don't just fall into their own footprint unless they are PROFESSIONALLY demolished. And of course we have Larry Silverstein on LIVE TV saying that Bldg 7(yes, there were 3 that fell) was going to be PULLED....AKA demolished.
mcap52 5 months ago
You can't be serious. First, Silverstein never had the authority to demolish any of his buildings. "Pull it" meant to pull out the firefighters. WTC 7 was already evacuated. There was no point in putting the lives of FDNY in jeopardy. Second, nobody said that the buildings fell on their own. A fucking fully-fueled jet crashed into the buildings, blowing off all the fireproofing and weakening the steel core of the buildings.
migkillertwo 5 months ago