SO wonderful. I don't think there's any disputing that this concerto makes a fine addition to the existing four. Even if it's not truly "Rachmaninoff's" fifth concerto, I think the very nature of art is reconstruction and reimagination. That Warenberg transformed so exceptionally a grand symphonic work into a stylistically accurate piece on an even more dynamic scale is, to say the least, extremely impressive. Kudos to Warenberg and to Rachmaninoff.
As long as the Rach5 title is put in quotation marks and the true nature of the work is explained, I for one wouldn't mind. Actually I did a somewhat similar thing in 1997 with Grieg, making a concerto out of his sparing sketches for his embryonic 2nd in B minor. A performance of this work in Kaunas, Lithuania in 2009 lies on YouTube, beginning with v=Fffd8R7c-U
@PiningGersha I don't think so.I really appreciate the amzing work made by the transcriber. Huge work, very well done. It really sounds Rachmaninov in way the piano parte has been worked out. Congratulations!
@PiningGersha. I don't think so, there's such a rich history of piano arrangements - see all the Liszt ones. All the same, there's an amazing sequence of descending scales in the final movement, and I think the arrangement (or perhaps the performance) makes a total hash of it. Otherwise very enjoyable.
This is not the piano concerto no. 5, by Rachmaninoff, it's just an arrangement of the symphony no. 2, i think that it's wrong to use that name to this arrangement.
It's nice, thats true, but, that name it's inappropiate.
Rach also did variations on other classical composers' music. Don't stumble over details but enjoy the haunting melodies.
xrayman149 2 days ago
I just want 2:30 to 3:20 on a loop. So magnificent.
pianoforte611 6 days ago
SO wonderful. I don't think there's any disputing that this concerto makes a fine addition to the existing four. Even if it's not truly "Rachmaninoff's" fifth concerto, I think the very nature of art is reconstruction and reimagination. That Warenberg transformed so exceptionally a grand symphonic work into a stylistically accurate piece on an even more dynamic scale is, to say the least, extremely impressive. Kudos to Warenberg and to Rachmaninoff.
King9Dante 1 month ago
As long as the Rach5 title is put in quotation marks and the true nature of the work is explained, I for one wouldn't mind. Actually I did a somewhat similar thing in 1997 with Grieg, making a concerto out of his sparing sketches for his embryonic 2nd in B minor. A performance of this work in Kaunas, Lithuania in 2009 lies on YouTube, beginning with v=Fffd8R7c-U
helgeevju 2 months ago
do you think Rach is tossing and turning in his grave?
PiningGersha 2 months ago
@PiningGersha Why dont you ask him?
wilsonnkwan 2 months ago 5
@wilsonnkwan STFU
PiningGersha 2 months ago
@PiningGersha I don't think so.I really appreciate the amzing work made by the transcriber. Huge work, very well done. It really sounds Rachmaninov in way the piano parte has been worked out. Congratulations!
lesginka 2 months ago
@PiningGersha. I don't think so, there's such a rich history of piano arrangements - see all the Liszt ones. All the same, there's an amazing sequence of descending scales in the final movement, and I think the arrangement (or perhaps the performance) makes a total hash of it. Otherwise very enjoyable.
domcogan 2 months ago
This is not the piano concerto no. 5, by Rachmaninoff, it's just an arrangement of the symphony no. 2, i think that it's wrong to use that name to this arrangement.
It's nice, thats true, but, that name it's inappropiate.
tibicem 4 months ago
@tibicem Note the description...
wilsonnkwan 4 months ago